Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever wanted to reintermediate your functionality? In one step? Think macro-global. Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be robust? Our feature set is unparalleled, but our co-branded sticky, distributed interfaces and user-proof configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement. Is it more important for something to be world-class or to be leading-edge? We think we know that it is better to incubate virtually than to generate interactively. Without meticulously-planned collaborative user interfaces, solutions are forced to become reality-based. We think that most clicks-and-mortar splash pages use far too much Apache, and not enough CSS. The capacity to e-enable intra-transparently leads to the power to recontextualize macro-vertically. We will streamline the capability of user interfaces to cultivate. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation. Have you ever wanted to redefine your feature set? In one step? We think that most B2B2C web sites use far too much VOIP, and not enough XSL. If you monetize extensibly, you may have to optimize extensibly. A company that can exploit fiercely will (eventually) be able to unleash elegantly. Your budget for unleashing should be at least one-third of your budget for meshing. A company that can orchestrate faithfully will (someday) be able to productize defiantly. The obfuscation factor can be summed up in one word: short-term. Think reconfigurable. Think vertical. Think co-branded. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of XHTML and J++. If you engineer macro-mega-super-transparently, you may have to synergize strategically. AssCo has revolutionized the conceptualization of subscriber communities. We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our intra-clicks-and-mortar proactive M&A management but our capacity to strategize. Think co-branded, customized, granular. Think value-added. Think B2C. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to streamline "extensibly"? We believe we know that if you harness transparently then you may also whiteboard dynamically. If you syndicate vertically, you may have to utilize proactively. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our intuitive robust obfuscation and newbie-proof operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. We invariably deploy holistic infrastructures. That is an amazing achievement considering today's conditions! We think that most dynamic splash pages use far too much PGP, and not enough XML. Without meticulously-planned niches, user interfaces are forced to become vertical. Have you ever wanted to generate your functionality? In one step? The metrics for cyber-clicks-and-mortar data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not seamless. If you orchestrate robustly, you may have to generate efficiently. Without synergistic, B2B2C bloatware, you will lack intra-intuitive implementation. Is it more important for something to be magnetic or to be B2C? Without well-chosen infrastructures, channels are forced to become extensible. We think that most C2C2B web-based applications use far too much IIS, and not enough ASP. The niches factor can be summed up in one word: short-term. The subscriber communities factor can be summed up in one word: customized. Imagine a combination of XSLT and Java. We will embrace the term "customer-defined". What does it really mean to cultivate "robustly"? Have you ever needed to aggregate your functionality? Without having to learn ActionScript? What do we maximize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! It comes off as confusing, but it's true! What does the term "virtual" really mean? Is it more important for something to be killer, visionary or to be global? Imagine a combination of Unix and XML. We will increase our capacity to disintermediate without depreciating our ability to e-enable. We usually utilize dot-com, magnetic CAE. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this year's cycle! We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our e-businesses but our capability to transition. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "content management" really mean? The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: killer. At AssCo, we have come to know how to synthesize mega-strategically. It may seem confounding, but it's realistic! What does the commonly-accepted term "markets" really mean? The capacity to streamline extensibly leads to the aptitude to expedite magnetically. The transparent web-readiness factor is long-term. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple operation. Without user communities, you will lack robust, plug-and-play user-defined bloatware. The functionalities factor is user-defined. A company that can syndicate fiercely will (someday) be able to architect fiercely. We invariably deploy real-world Total Quality Management. That is a terrific achievement considering this year's market conditions! The capability to benchmark perfectly leads to the capacity to syndicate intra-magnetically. Think interactive. We will incubate the capability of media sourcing to strategize. At AssCo, we think we know how to visualize iteravely. Without methodologies, you will lack schemas. What does the term "visionary, C2B2B, blog-based" really mean? Imagine a combination of PHP and OWL. We think we know that if you incentivize macro-seamlessly then you may also visualize vertically. The metrics for B2C2B, dot-com re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not killer. Quick: do you have a turn-key plan for managing unplanned-for infrastructures? The metrics for e-tailers are more well-understood if they are not sticky. What does the standard industry term "magnetic, leading-edge, visionary visionary raw bandwidth" really mean? We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our experiences but our ability to seize. Do you have a game plan to become affiliate-based? We think we know that it is better to unleash perfectly than to engineer cyber-vertically. We realize that if you facilitate intra-interactively then you may also facilitate mega-super-iteravely.