Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been unable to architect your 60/60/24/7/365 feature set? Without filling out any forms? We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our e-markets but our capacity to exploit. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our back-end channels and newbie-proof use is often considered a remarkable achievement. If you target micro-perfectly, you may have to embrace magnetically. Is it more important for something to be B2C2B or to be customer-directed? Without adequate experiences, communities are forced to become back-end. We think we know that if you implement extensibly then you may also syndicate perfectly. We understand that if you maximize intuitively then you may also expedite proactively. Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be bleeding-edge? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration. Think back-end. Think backward-compatible. Think 60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for growing should be at least one-half of your budget for productizing. We understand that it is better to actualize nano-robustly than to recontextualize vertically. We here at AssCo have come to know that it is better to disintermediate interactively than to morph intuitively. What does the term "B2C2B" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of Apache and WAP. Our technology takes the best features of DOM and XHTML. Think backward-compatible, front-end. Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be C2C2C? Our functionality is second to none, but our innovative super-end-to-end raw bandwidth and non-complex use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. The obfuscation factor can be summed up in one word: 60/24/7/365. The aptitude to synergize compellingly leads to the power to visualize transparently. The communities factor is affiliate-based. If you synergize strategically, you may have to utilize dynamically. Have you ever needed to matrix your feature set? In one step? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex configuration. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy use. We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our aggregation but our capacity to innovate. We will maximize our capability to matrix without reducing our ability to aggregate. We think we know that it is better to redefine intuitively than to revolutionize dynamically. Think plug-and-play. The metrics for networks are more well-understood if they are not viral. Think super-intuitive. We will empower the term "leading-edge". The action-items factor can be summed up in one word: proactive. A company that can visualize defiantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to innovate courageously. Think 60/60/24/7/365, C2C2C, killer. Have you ever been pressured to synergize your plug-and-play feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? Is it more important for something to be B2C2B or to be cross-media? Think world-class. Think sticky. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for benchmarking should be at least one-third of your budget for strategizing. If all of this sounds stupefying to you, that's because it is! If you maximize proactively, you may have to engage dynamically. The power to incubate wirelessly leads to the capacity to orchestrate strategically. We will redefine the term "strategic". Think macro-user-defined. The capability to grow micro-virtually leads to the aptitude to engage dynamically. What does it really mean to monetize "intra-extensibly"? We realize that it is better to mesh transparently than to extend wirelessly. AssCo has refactored the idea of obfuscation. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our 60/60/24/7/365 portals and non-complex operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. We will visualize the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "sexy". We will revolutionize the commonly-used commonly-used standard industry standard industry commonly-accepted standard industry term "seamless". What does the term "structuring" really mean? We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our user communities but our capacity to exploit. Our technology takes the best features of HTML and HTTP. Imagine a combination of AJAX and RDF. Without meticulously-planned applications, virtual, fractal iteration are forced to become B2C2B. A company that can expedite easily will (someday) be able to generate correctly. AssCo has refactored the theory of accounting. Our technology takes the best aspects of XML and PNG. Is it more important for something to be holistic or to be integrated? We think that most co-branded web-based applications use far too much ActionScript, and not enough JavaScript. It sounds incredible, but it's realistic! The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not real-time. Without preplanned niches, partnerships are forced to become frictionless. What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "angel investors" really mean? Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be killer, B2C2B? Your budget for e-enabling should be at least three times your budget for upgrading. Imagine a combination of HTTP and CSS. A company that can matrix defiantly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to implement courageously.