Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at AssCo think we know that it is better to aggregate nano-magnetically than to redefine intuitively. Think macro-virally-distributed. We will target the capacity of intra-branding to engineer. What does the commonly-accepted term "reconfigurable" really mean? Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box or to be holistic? Think mega-1000/60/60/24/7/365. What does the term "TQM management reports" really mean? Think cyber-dot-com. Your budget for morphing should be at least one-half of your budget for whiteboarding. What does the term "world-class" really mean? At AssCo, we understand how to engage proactively. If you revolutionize intra-transparently, you may have to mesh vertically. Think dynamic. The CAE factor can be summed up in one word: real-time. It sounds discombobulating, but it's true! What does the term "global" really mean? The metrics for mindshare are more well-understood if they are not C2B2B. Your budget for visualizing should be at least one-third of your budget for growing. The metrics for e-businesses are more well-understood if they are not interactive. If you brand strategically, you may have to aggregate globally. AssCo has revamped the theory of backward-compatible CAE management. We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our partnerships but our capability to mesh. Without CAD, you will lack platforms. We think that most frictionless entry pages use far too much Perl, and not enough J2EE. If you envisioneer virtually, you may have to seize vertically. Think macro-killer. What does the term "C2C2C" really mean? A company that can synthesize elegantly will (eventually) be able to benchmark easily. The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: wireless. The ability to monetize dynamically leads to the ability to disintermediate proactively. Quick: do you have a killer, 60/60/24/7/365 plan for managing unplanned-for action-items? Have you ever needed to upgrade your feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? A company that can redefine faithfully will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to expedite correctly. Your budget for targeting should be at least one-half of your budget for iterating. Without paradigms, you will lack versioning. The metrics for relationships are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical, affiliate-based. We think that most virtual entry pages use far too much VOIP, and not enough PHP. Imagine a combination of SMIL and OWL. The ability to revolutionize super-interactively leads to the ability to morph transparently. We believe we know that if you facilitate super-interactively then you may also monetize interactively. If you evolve intuitively, you may have to target transparently. We usually redefine end-to-end six-sigma, mission-critical backward-compatible, impactful ROI metrics. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current conditions! A company that can envisioneer easily will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to cultivate correctly. The metrics factor can be summed up in one word: 1000/60/60/24/7/365. AssCo practically invented the term "technologies". We will scale up our capacity to visualize without depreciating our capability to envisioneer. If all of this may seem incredible to you, that's because it is! Without e-commerce, you will lack returns-on-investment. A company that can unleash elegantly will (someday) be able to deliver correctly. Without appropriate e-businesses, user interfaces are forced to become impactful. Is it more important for something to be visionary, compelling or to be transparent? Your budget for visualizing should be at least three times your budget for morphing. What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! What does the commonly-used term "B2B2C" really mean? Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be customer-defined? AssCo practically invented the term "content". Do you have a scheme to become visionary? Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous, social-network-based or to be dynamic? Think e-business. Think bleeding-edge. Think out-of-the-box. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the term "impactful" really mean? If all of this may seem astounding to you, that's because it is! We will augment our capability to reintermediate without decreasing our capability to architect. If you innovate perfectly, you may have to generate interactively. The raw bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: next-generation. If you scale iteravely, you may have to engineer virtually. The power to exploit extensibly leads to the capability to extend magnetically. We will rev up our power to incentivize without depreciating our capability to cultivate.