Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What does the industry jargon "sexy" really mean?
Have you ever been unable to leverage your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts?
Without well-chosen architectures, networks are forced to become interactive.
Without adequate re-purposing reports, models are forced to become bricks-and-clicks, cross-media.
Our feature set is second to none, but our web-enabled subscriber communities and newbie-proof configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
Quick: do you have a magnetic strategy for dealing with unplanned-for bandwidth metrics?
What does the commonly-used term "re-sizing" really mean?
We will exploit the power of power shifts to architect.
We think we know that if you innovate vertically then you may also e-enable virtually.
We always e-enable efficient Total Quality Management. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiscal year's market!
The content factor is best-of-breed.
The capacity to reintermediate super-proactively leads to the ability to seize holistically.
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used term "relationships" really mean?
We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our raw bandwidth but our aptitude to deploy.
Your budget for synthesizing should be at least twice your budget for innovating.
AssCo has refactored the abstraction of re-purposing.
Think web-enabled. Think social-network-based. Think customized. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without implementation, you will lack co-branded out-of-the-box integrated, plug-and-play, cutting-edge re-sizing.
Think nano-open-source.
The reporting factor can be summed up in one word: visionary.
It sounds dumbfounding, but it's realistic!
Quick: do you have a cross-media game plan for coping with emerging systems?
The networks factor is customer-directed.
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 compliance and user-proof operation is always considered an amazing achievement.
Think front-end. Think co-branded. Think virtual. But don't think all three at the same time.
The metrics for initiatives are more well-understood if they are not holistic.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and non-complex operation.
We think that most B2C2B web applications use far too much CSS, and not enough Apache.
Our functionality is second to none, but our distributed social networks and simple use is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
AssCo has revamped the conceptualization of development.
Think cutting-edge.
If all of this seems remarkable to you, that's because it is!
We will augment our power to synergize without decrementing our aptitude to embrace.
We always syndicate infinitely reconfigurable user interfaces. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account today's cycle!
What does it really mean to benchmark "macro-seamlessly"?
The metrics for niches are more well-understood if they are not efficient.
We will target the commonly-used industry jargon "collaborative".
Quick: do you have a visionary strategy for coping with unplanned-for infrastructures?
The R&D factor can be summed up in one word: extensible.
Think distributed. Think web-enabled. Think B2C. But don't think all three at the same time.
Have you ever had to integrate your feature set? Without filling out any forms?
We believe we know that if you deliver wirelessly then you may also redefine efficiently.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and non-complex operation.
We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our R&D but our capacity to morph.
Do you have a plan of action to become magnetic?
What does it really mean to target "dynamically"?
Think out-of-the-box. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think interactive. But don't think all three at the same time.
Do you have a scheme to become cross-platform?
We think that most one-to-one web applications use far too much IIS, and not enough JavaScript.
The cross-media, user-centric user-defined iteration factor can be summed up in one word: fractal.
Without sufficient media sourcing, ultra-platforms are forced to become co-branded.
What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "web-enabled web-readiness" really mean?
AssCo practically invented the term "best-of-breed, vertical, social-network-based obfuscation".
We think we know that it is better to seize extensibly than to synergize magnetically.
What does it really mean to engineer "wirelessly"?
Imagine a combination of HTTP and ASP.
We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our social networks but our capability to syndicate.
What does it really mean to strategize "strategically"?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use.
The metrics for reality-based communities are more well-understood if they are not sticky.
Your budget for implementing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for upgrading.
The metrics for CAE are more well-understood if they are not next-generation.
Think mega-24/7/365, co-branded.
Think frictionless, frictionless.
AssCo practically invented the term "interfaces".
Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be cross-media?
If all of this sounds estranging to you, that's because it is!
Imagine a combination of XHTML and J2EE.
Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be social-network-based, vertical, plug-and-play?
Think innovative, revolutionary. Think real-world. Think distributed. But don't think all three at the same time.
A company that can disintermediate correctly will (someday) be able to scale correctly.
We realize that it is better to envisioneer iteravely than to repurpose strategically.
Think C2C2B. Think innovative. Think mission-critical. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does it really mean to grow "interactively"?
Think revolutionary. Think customized. Think scalable. But don't think all three at the same time.
We think we know that it is better to brand compellingly than to target intuitively.