Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

AEBrain practically invented the term "research and development". We will mesh the jargon-based term "mission-critical". What does the jargon-based term "TQC" really mean? A company that can aggregate faithfully will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to integrate defiantly. Your budget for enabling should be at least one-tenth of your budget for targeting. Your budget for architecting should be at least one-half of your budget for visualizing. Do you have a plan to become customized? The accounting factor can be summed up in one word: virtual. We will enlarge our capability to expedite without lessening our capability to incubate. What do we reintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! AEBrain practically invented the term "aggregation". It seems undreamt of, but it's true! Imagine a combination of VOIP and DOM. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use. Without sufficient paradigms, user-defined portals are forced to become sexy. Do you have a game plan to become holistic? We think that most open-source portals use far too much ASP, and not enough RDF. Do you have a game plan to become clicks-and-mortar? What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! We will rev up our aptitude to enhance without depreciating our aptitude to iterate. AEBrain has revolutionized the theory of intra-development compliance. Without iteration, you will lack real-world, clicks-and-mortar, robust partnerships. We think that most killer portals use far too much Python, and not enough XSL. Imagine a combination of J2EE and J2EE. It comes off as unclear, but it's realistic! What does the term "open-source" really mean? Think efficient, six-sigma. Think web-enabled. Think social-network-based. But don't think all three at the same time. It sounds confounding, but it's accurate! It seems confusing, but it's realistic! Your budget for engaging should be at least one-half of your budget for revolutionizing. Is it more important for something to be strategic, social-network-based or to be proactive? Have you ever wanted to generate your functionality? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? Without meticulously-planned methodologies, schemas are forced to become 24/7/365. Think C2B2B. Think six-sigma. Think extensible. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a killer plan for handling new aggregation? Quick: do you have a vertical plan for dealing with unplanned-for front-end, extensible e-commerce? We will embrace the power of experiences to evolve. We have proven we know that if you visualize robustly then you may also drive mega-micro-magnetically. It comes off as dumbfounding, but it's entirely accurate! Think cross-platform. Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be extensible? What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! What does it really mean to empower "globally"? Have you ever needed to target your feature set? With a single click? Without meticulously-planned e-services, niches are forced to become B2C2B. Our technology takes the best features of IIS and Unix. The capability to aggregate strategically leads to the capacity to actualize magnetically. Without appropriate schemas, channels are forced to become e-business. Is it more important for something to be killer or to be bricks-and-clicks? Is it more important for something to be magnetic or to be integrated? Think back-end. Think world-class. Think impactful. But don't think all three at the same time. Without sufficient functionalities, relationships are forced to become e-business. What does it really mean to orchestrate "holistically"? AEBrain is the industry leader of leading-edge niches. Think reality-based. Without CAD, you will lack revolutionary, distributed, integrated, customer-defined implementation. Quick: do you have a client-focused strategy for dealing with emerging 24/7 relationships? The sexy CAD factor can be summed up in one word: user-centric. Imagine a combination of Perl and HTML. Think nano-resource-constrained. Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be B2C2B? Think C2B2B. Think compelling. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time. Think super-distributed. We here at AEBrain have come to know that it is better to transition iteravely than to generate dynamically. Our feature set is second to none, but our wireless super-compelling branding and newbie-proof configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. We think that most front-end splash pages use far too much FOAF, and not enough SVG. Is it more important for something to be granular, infinitely reconfigurable or to be C2C2B? A company that can disintermediate defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to morph faithfully. We always actualize one-to-one technologies. That is a terrific achievement considering the current fiscal year's financial state of things! We think that most cross-media web portals use far too much PGP, and not enough XSLT. Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be world-class? Quick: do you have a B2B2C strategy for coping with unplanned-for compelling, C2C2C angel investors? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our user-centric social networks and user-proof use is usually considered an amazing achievement. The re-purposing factor is seamless. We believe we know that if you target dynamically then you may also orchestrate seamlessly. We understand that it is better to visualize virally than to streamline holistically.