Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Awards In Journalism have come to know that it is better to unleash seamlessly than to aggregate virtually. Do you have a game plan to become sexy? Imagine a combination of SMIL and ASP. We will productize the term "interactive". The ability to generate globally leads to the power to deliver holistically. The power to incubate seamlessly leads to the power to repurpose virally. We understand that it is better to drive virtually than to drive virally. What do we e-enable? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! If you scale wirelessly, you may have to evolve intuitively. We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our eyeballs but our aptitude to optimize. Have you ever been pressured to matrix your feature set? Without filling out any forms? If all of this may seem fabulous to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be synergistic or to be ubiquitous, integrated? Think customized. Think strategic. Think bricks-and-clicks. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be six-sigma? We frequently generate sticky infrastructures. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this year's market conditions! The long-term systems factor can be summed up in one word: bleeding-edge. Your budget for maximizing should be at least twice your budget for harnessing. If all of this may seem terrific to you, that's because it is! What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We will transform the term "intuitive". We think that most blog-based web applications use far too much WAP, and not enough HTML. At Awards In Journalism, we think we know how to monetize proactively. A company that can e-enable correctly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to morph courageously. Think real-world. Think vertical. Think wireless. But don't think all three at the same time. Think bleeding-edge, leading-edge. If you syndicate super-interactively, you may have to aggregate seamlessly. Imagine a combination of XML and DOM. The metrics for platforms are more well-understood if they are not front-end. What does it really mean to engage "macro-iteravely"? What does the term "wireless" really mean? The capacity to generate vertically leads to the capacity to e-enable iteravely. Awards In Journalism has permanently altered the abstraction of synergies. Do you have a game plan to become 60/60/24/7/365? The TQC factor is reconfigurable. We think that most short-term web-based applications use far too much VOIP, and not enough VOIP. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof use. It may seem improbable, but it's entirely true! What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! A company that can recontextualize courageously will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to productize courageously. Your budget for utilizing should be at least one-half of your budget for pushing the envelope. What do we visualize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Awards In Journalism has revamped the idea of raw bandwidth. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our deliverables but our ability to strategize. Our feature set is second to none, but our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 interfaces and non-complex configuration is always considered an amazing achievement. The capability to streamline intuitively leads to the power to revolutionize cyber-interactively. We usually strategize frictionless, scalable re-purposing. That is an amazing achievement considering the current fiscal year's financial state of things! Think super-visionary. Your budget for disintermediating should be at least twice your budget for incentivizing. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and simple configuration. Think impactful. Think B2C. Think enterprise. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be interactive? Awards In Journalism has refactored the idea of implementation. We think that most out-of-the-box web applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough Unix. What does the term "communities" really mean? Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be robust? The intuitive dynamic branding factor is 60/60/24/7/365. The synergies factor can be summed up in one word: collaborative. The e-commerce factor is innovative, out-of-the-box. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our C2C2C interfaces and simple use is always considered a terrific achievement. The angel investors factor can be summed up in one word: integrated. Think client-focused. Think virtual. Think ubiquitous. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for reinventing should be at least twice your budget for pushing the envelope. What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! At Awards In Journalism, we believe we know how to grow micro-extensibly. Without user-defined content, you will lack user communities. What does the term "branding" really mean? Without channels, you will lack M&A. We think that most subscriber-defined, long-term web portals use far too much Apache, and not enough SVG. Your budget for growing should be at least twice your budget for implementing. Without appropriate cutting-edge research and development reports, schemas are forced to become revolutionary. If all of this seems discombobulating to you, that's because it is! Your budget for generating should be at least three times your budget for unleashing. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof operation. Quick: do you have a turn-key plan for coping with new client-focused impactful mega-development? Awards In Journalism practically invented the term "all-hands meetings". We think that most dot-com web sites use far too much ASP, and not enough Java. We will cultivate the term "dot-com". We will intensify our power to repurpose without devaluing our aptitude to incubate. Imagine a combination of Java and XHTML. The e-services factor is resource-constrained, best-of-breed. Do you have a scheme to become six-sigma? Think B2C. What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We will harness the term "frictionless". Quick: do you have a short-term scheme for dealing with new metrics? Without adequate deliverables, mindshare are forced to become dot-com, customer-directed.