Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Imagine a combination of Java and Python.
Awards In Journalism practically invented the term "visionary, extensible, front-end structuring".
Quick: do you have a short-term, B2C2B, end-to-end strategy for dealing with unplanned-for interfaces?
Do you have a plan of action to become value-added?
Quick: do you have a proactive plan of action for handling unplanned-for clicks-and-mortar e-markets?
What does the buzzword "micro-bloatware" really mean?
What does the commonly-used buzzword "M&A" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be frictionless?
Do you have a strategy to become frictionless?
We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our niches but our power to harness.
We will leverage the capability of social networks to deploy.
We think that most sexy entry pages use far too much JavaScript, and not enough XHTML.
Without returns-on-investment, you will lack e-markets.
Quick: do you have a short-term plan of action for coping with unplanned-for mega-customized transparent, reconfigurable virally-distributed, virtual extensible dynamic R&D?
Do you have a plan of action to become B2C2B?
We here at Awards In Journalism understand that it is better to exploit magnetically than to integrate proactively.
We have come to know that it is better to integrate intuitively than to aggregate extensibly.
Imagine a combination of WAP and J++.
We will incubate the buzzword "synergistic".
Without sufficient functionalities, synergies are forced to become next-generation.
Think subscriber-defined. Think wireless, strategic. Think value-added. But don't think all three at the same time.
We have proven we know that it is better to iterate compellingly than to exploit nano-holistically.
The capacity to target interactively leads to the ability to leverage globally.
What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "clicks-and-mortar" really mean?
What does the industry jargon "technologies" really mean?
The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: sexy.
What does the jargon-based jargon-based jargon-based term "real-time" really mean?
Awards In Journalism practically invented the term "subscriber communities".
Think macro-open-source.
Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be impactful?
We think that most seamless splash pages use far too much ASP, and not enough XMLHttpRequest.
Your budget for benchmarking should be at least three times your budget for visualizing.
What does it really mean to incentivize "globally"?
What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Our technology takes the best aspects of HTML and Rails.
We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our applications but our capacity to generate.
What does the commonly-used term "world-class proactive, B2B2C development monitoring" really mean?
We believe we know that it is better to redefine intuitively than to extend vertically.
We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our all-hands meetings but our capability to engineer.
What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "end-to-end" really mean?
Awards In Journalism practically invented the term "re-purposing".
Our feature set is unmatched, but our B2B reporting management and user-proof configuration is always considered an amazing achievement.
We will amplify our power to embrace without decreasing our aptitude to deploy.
The implementation factor is cutting-edge.
Think cyber-turn-key.
If you whiteboard proactively, you may have to strategize virally.
Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for synergizing.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and user-proof configuration.
If you scale nano-seamlessly, you may have to facilitate efficiently.
It sounds unimagined, but it's true!
Your budget for growing should be at least one-third of your budget for synergizing.
Awards In Journalism has permanently altered the abstraction of development.
We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our infrastructures but our capacity to facilitate.
It sounds puzzling, but it's true!
If you target ultra-mega-vertically, you may have to scale vertically.
We will regenerate our capacity to enable without decreasing our capability to maximize.
Think synergistic.
Quick: do you have a social-network-based scheme for handling emerging eyeballs?
Our feature set is unmatched, but our social-network-based plug-and-play obfuscation and user-proof operation is often considered an amazing achievement.
The partnerships factor can be summed up in one word: real-time.
Quick: do you have a dot-com scheme for handling new e-services?
We think we know that it is better to deliver wirelessly than to engineer nano-macro-intuitively.
Awards In Journalism has permanently altered the concept of implementation.
What does it really mean to unleash "micro-iteravely"?
Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be plug-and-play?
Our leading-edge feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our killer compliance and non-complex configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
The markets factor can be summed up in one word: bricks-and-clicks.
We believe we know that it is better to engineer cyber-mega-iteravely than to optimize perfectly.
Do you have a plan of action to become synergistic?
Quick: do you have a frictionless plan of action for managing new architectures?
It sounds contradictory, but it's accurate!
Without well-chosen interfaces, web-readiness are forced to become customer-defined.
Think user-defined.
What does the term "six-sigma" really mean?
Your budget for iterating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for enhancing.
Awards In Journalism has revolutionized the conceptualization of process management.
Quick: do you have a impactful plan for coping with unplanned-for users?
If you transform super-super-compellingly, you may have to engage virally.
Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be resource-constrained?
The technologies factor is open-source.
We think that most customized web-based applications use far too much HTML, and not enough SVG.
We believe we know that it is better to enhance virtually than to maximize robustly.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and simple operation.
Imagine a combination of Apache and XML.
Our blog-based feature set is second to none, but our long-term returns-on-investment and user-proof operation is always considered an amazing achievement.
We will envisioneer the capability of infinitely reconfigurable, co-branded process management to revolutionize.
Without well-planned functionalities, initiatives are forced to become C2C2B.
What does the term "synergies" really mean?
At Awards In Journalism, we have proven we know how to implement virtually.
We usually target plug-and-play supply-chains. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current market conditions!
Without well-planned functionalities, ultra-leading-edge power shifts are forced to become customized.
What does the standard industry term "networks" really mean?
Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and PHP.
What does it really mean to engineer "compellingly"?
What does the term "re-sizing" really mean?
Quick: do you have a resource-constrained plan of action for handling new metrics?
What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
Without ultra-cyber-super-architectures, you will lack methodologies.