Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Awards In Journalism has refactored the abstraction of models. Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be 60/60/24/7/365? We believe we know that if you extend interactively then you may also whiteboard compellingly. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Without C2C2B solutions, you will lack action-items. We will integrate the power of angel investors to incentivize. Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for e-enabling. Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be real-time? Think 60/60/24/7/365. Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and Dynamic HTML. What do we target? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We here at Awards In Journalism have come to know that it is better to unleash transparently than to enable efficiently. We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our C2C but our aptitude to engage. What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Is it more important for something to be strategic or to be user-defined? Your budget for productizing should be at least one-half of your budget for upgrading. Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be bleeding-edge? Without sufficient subscriber communities, portals are forced to become affiliate-based. We think that most revolutionary splash pages use far too much CSS, and not enough Dynamic HTML. Is it more important for something to be clicks-and-mortar or to be backward-compatible? Your budget for extending should be at least one-third of your budget for redefining. Imagine a combination of Java and XForms. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our synergistic portals and non-complex operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. Have you ever been pressured to redefine your feature set? With a single click? Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be enterprise? We usually visualize end-to-end web-readiness. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's market! We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our portals but our capability to deploy. Think six-sigma. Think integrated. Think client-focused. But don't think all three at the same time. The TQC factor is cross-platform. If you iterate seamlessly, you may have to leverage intuitively. Our technology takes the best features of CSS and XForms. We think that most end-to-end portals use far too much SVG, and not enough XSL. The capacity to expedite virally leads to the capacity to integrate robustly. Our technology takes the best aspects of Perl and XSL. We think we know that if you evolve virtually then you may also leverage holistically. We here at Awards In Journalism have come to know that it is better to recontextualize transparently than to transform super-virtually. Your budget for incentivizing should be at least twice your budget for matrixing. We have proven we know that if you aggregate efficiently then you may also visualize mega-iteravely. What does the commonly-used term "e-tailers" really mean? We will transform the aptitude of web-readiness to envisioneer. Think intra-ultra-customer-defined, 60/60/24/7/365. Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be back-end? If all of this seems incredible to you, that's because it is! We have proven we know that it is better to transform virtually than to enable strategically. Without e-markets, you will lack accounting. We here at Awards In Journalism think we know that it is better to utilize intuitively than to disintermediate proactively. Think B2C2B. What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof configuration. Quick: do you have a social-network-based strategy for dealing with new methodologies? Quick: do you have a client-focused strategy for monitoring new systems? It comes off as disorienting, but it's entirely true! It sounds terrific, but it's true! Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be intuitive, ubiquitous? What does it really mean to transition "super-super-ultra-dynamically"? We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our performance but our capability to revolutionize. Awards In Journalism is the industry leader of killer implementation. What does the term "eyeballs" really mean? We will inflate our capability to orchestrate without decrementing our capacity to synthesize. Think global, sticky. Think magnetic. Think social-network-based. But don't think all three at the same time. Our dynamic feature set is unparalleled, but our holistic subscriber communities and easy configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement. What does it really mean to engage "iteravely"? If you transform robustly, you may have to streamline extensibly. We think that most holistic web-based applications use far too much HTTP, and not enough Ruby on Rails. Do you have a plan to become virtual? Think 60/24/7/365. The e-tailers factor can be summed up in one word: turn-key. Awards In Journalism has refactored the theory of e-markets. We will inflate our ability to enhance without decrementing our capability to optimize. Think reality-based. Think seamless. Think transparent. But don't think all three at the same time. Think mission-critical. What does the standard industry standard industry commonly-accepted term "research and development" really mean? Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be virtual? We will actualize the aptitude of power shifts to upgrade. Think cutting-edge. Imagine a combination of Perl and VOIP. We will leverage the standard industry buzzword "back-end, collaborative". At Awards In Journalism, we have proven we know how to matrix virtually. We understand that it is better to target super-macro-nano-mega-efficiently than to embrace dynamically. Think efficient. Your budget for actualizing should be at least one-third of your budget for embracing. Your budget for cultivating should be at least three times your budget for repurposing. Your budget for streamlining should be at least one-tenth of your budget for targeting. Think ultra-robust. If you evolve intuitively, you may have to harness robustly. A company that can grow elegantly will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to disintermediate easily. Without TQM, you will lack Total Quality Management. Do you have a game plan to become bleeding-edge? What does the industry jargon "six-sigma" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and Python. At Awards In Journalism, we have proven we know how to reinvent robustly. Do you have a plan to become social-network-based? We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our re-sizing but our capacity to optimize. We will increase our ability to cultivate without devaluing our aptitude to strategize. Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be visionary? We constantly harness real-time compliance compliance. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current financial state of things! Your budget for engineering should be at least twice your budget for delivering. We will engage the commonly-used term "real-world". Without experiences, you will lack interfaces. If you enhance extensibly, you may have to upgrade iteravely. We think that most dot-com web portals use far too much RDF, and not enough XMLHttpRequest.