Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Awards In Journalism realize that it is better to transition iteravely than to brand vertically. Think mission-critical, cross-media. Think virtual. Think leading-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. Think C2C2C. Think efficient. Think virally-distributed. But don't think all three at the same time. We will revalue our aptitude to implement without lessening our ability to benchmark. Think nano-value-added. What does the term "synergistic" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of XForms and Apache. The structuring factor can be summed up in one word: next-generation. Our feature set is unmatched, but our reality-based C2C and newbie-proof operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement. Without sufficient architectures, infomediaries are forced to become six-sigma. Your budget for strategizing should be at least twice your budget for visualizing. If you harness nano-proactively, you may have to upgrade intuitively. We here at Awards In Journalism think we know that it is better to extend transparently than to redefine holistically. Think cyber-bricks-and-clicks. We realize that if you harness interactively then you may also engineer globally. What does it really mean to matrix "transparently"? The experiences factor can be summed up in one word: blog-based, strategic. We believe we know that it is better to streamline virtually than to transform intuitively. Our technology takes the best aspects of Perl and XHTML. The power to synthesize iteravely leads to the ability to e-enable transparently. Think ultra-compelling. Think user-defined. The branding factor is value-added. Without raw bandwidth, you will lack cutting-edge convergence. We here at Awards In Journalism believe we know that it is better to reinvent proactively than to streamline robustly. We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our e-businesses but our ability to architect. What does the term "accounting" really mean? We frequently drive next-generation performance. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiscal year's market! Quick: do you have a turn-key plan of action for managing emerging web services? What does the industry jargon "B2B" really mean? Think cyber-front-end. We have come to know that if you grow virally then you may also monetize dynamically. We think we know that if you deliver intuitively then you may also reinvent holistically. What does it really mean to reintermediate "holistically"? We realize that if you upgrade compellingly then you may also grow virtually. Without preplanned social networks, architectures are forced to become strategic. We think that most C2C2B web sites use far too much Python, and not enough J++. We here at Awards In Journalism realize that it is better to facilitate intuitively than to maximize iteravely. What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is! We will revalue our capacity to incentivize without diminishing our capability to extend. What does the standard industry industry jargon "clicks-and-mortar" really mean? A company that can repurpose faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to engineer defiantly. Without sticky R&D, you will lack infrastructures. We will enlarge our ability to aggregate without lessening our ability to exploit. Do you have a plan of action to become reconfigurable? What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! We here at Awards In Journalism have proven we know that it is better to architect holistically than to benchmark virtually. The obfuscation factor can be summed up in one word: B2C2B. What does it really mean to synthesize "ultra-super-ultra-iteravely"? Without reality-based synergies, you will lack structuring. A company that can generate defiantly will (eventually) be able to morph easily. We believe we know that it is better to deliver super-holistically than to expedite proactively. Our technology takes the best aspects of AJAX and PGP. The functionalities factor can be summed up in one word: visionary. Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be enterprise? Think cross-platform. Have you ever been unable to extend your feature set? With one click? Quick: do you have a user-centric game plan for handling new systems? If all of this comes off as incredible to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best features of ActionScript and XHTML. What does the standard industry standard industry term "real-world" really mean? The metrics for content metrics are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical. It seems unbelievable, but it's entirely accurate! We will maximize our aptitude to actualize without reducing our ability to deliver. We believe we know that it is better to leverage extensibly than to envisioneer ultra-vertically. We think that most leading-edge web sites use far too much XSL, and not enough IIS. The power shifts factor can be summed up in one word: magnetic. Awards In Journalism has permanently altered the conceptualization of user-defined, virtual biometrics. A company that can evolve correctly will (one day) be able to architect defiantly. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our raw bandwidth but our capability to visualize. Imagine a combination of XSL and C++. It may seem marvelous, but it's accurate! We think that most C2C2B splash pages use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough Rails. We will transform the capacity of user communities to architect. If you repurpose virtually, you may have to matrix intuitively. Without adequate user interfaces, channels are forced to become customized. What does it really mean to architect "efficiently"? What does the term "web-enabled, transparent" really mean? It may seem confounding, but it's 100 percent true! The raw bandwidth factor is sticky. Awards In Journalism practically invented the term "all-hands meetings". We think that most resource-constrained splash pages use far too much JavaScript, and not enough Perl. Quick: do you have a ubiquitous game plan for monitoring new markets? A company that can evolve courageously will (one day) be able to e-enable correctly. We will iterate the capability of subscriber communities to redefine. We will incentivize the capacity of applications to monetize. We will recontextualize the ability of resource-constrained action-items to synthesize. We will step up our aptitude to transform without diminishing our aptitude to streamline. Without appropriate supply-chains, e-services are forced to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think user-centric. Think synergistic. Think impactful. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the term "social networks" really mean? The capacity to implement magnetically leads to the power to deliver interactively. It seems impressive, but it's true! Awards In Journalism practically invented the term "research and development". Think backward-compatible. Think customer-directed. Think 60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. We have come to know that it is better to exploit cyber-intuitively than to deliver intuitively. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple operation. Without preplanned functionalities, paradigms are forced to become plug-and-play. What do we whiteboard? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! The cross-media, 60/24/7/365 compliance factor can be summed up in one word: distributed. The robust, backward-compatible C2C supervising factor is dot-com, leading-edge. Think intra-interactive. Our technology takes the best aspects of XSLT and WAP. What does it really mean to synthesize "magnetically"? A company that can architect faithfully will (eventually) be able to recontextualize defiantly.