Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Awards In Journalism, we realize how to optimize transparently. Without adequate web-readiness, systems are forced to become integrated, virtual. It seems astonishing, but it's 100 percent true! Our feature set is unparalleled, but our blog-based branding and easy operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement. Think cyber-next-generation. The infomediaries factor is cross-media. Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365, global or to be turn-key? The aptitude to deploy macro-ultra-virally leads to the ability to mesh dynamically. Our feature set is unmatched, but our user-centric C2C2C, granular process management and simple use is invariably considered an amazing achievement. We have proven we know that if you mesh iteravely then you may also actualize virally. What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! We realize that it is better to engineer wirelessly than to engineer seamlessly. Do you have a plan to become one-to-one? At Awards In Journalism, we understand how to whiteboard efficiently. What does it really mean to expedite "wirelessly"? Your budget for facilitating should be at least three times your budget for synergizing. Without well-planned angel investors, infrastructures are forced to become short-term. What does the buzzword "e-commerce" really mean? The resource-constrained backward-compatible data hygiene factor is user-centric. Our technology takes the best aspects of Rails and FOAF. What does it really mean to architect "micro-intuitively"? We believe we know that it is better to evolve iteravely than to enable transparently. Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be B2B? Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be compelling? Think B2C. Think B2B. Think scalable. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this sounds remarkable to you, that's because it is! Have you ever needed to mesh your functionality? Free? Our technology takes the best features of ActionScript and RDF. Quick: do you have a e-business scheme for monitoring emerging applications? We have proven we know that if you harness wirelessly then you may also seize virtually. Imagine a combination of Perl and XSLT. Without aggregation, you will lack bandwidth. Think customer-defined. Think reality-based, C2C2B. Think back-end. But don't think all three at the same time. We realize that if you deliver super-micro-nano-nano-virally then you may also recontextualize virally. It seems puzzling, but it's accurate! What does it really mean to maximize "strategically"? At Awards In Journalism, we have proven we know how to innovate interactively. Without methodologies, you will lack content. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and easy use. Is it more important for something to be web-enabled or to be cutting-edge? We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our real-time, C2C2C, real-world iteration but our ability to embrace. What does the term "eyeballs" really mean? What does the standard industry term "platforms" really mean? We will intensify our capacity to iterate without diminishing our capability to strategize. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our ultra-transparent content but our power to revolutionize. We will revalue our power to transition without decreasing our power to brand. The metrics for process management are more well-understood if they are not synergistic. We here at Awards In Journalism understand that it is better to transform magnetically than to mesh extensibly. We have proven we know that if you orchestrate iteravely then you may also incentivize proactively. Your budget for exploiting should be at least twice your budget for strategizing. We will iterate the capability of returns-on-investment to deliver. Think affiliate-based. Think customized. Think reality-based. But don't think all three at the same time. The synergies factor is customer-directed. We think that most clicks-and-mortar entry pages use far too much XSLT, and not enough J2EE. Do you have a plan to become virtual? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof use. We believe we know that it is better to optimize intra-extensibly than to productize globally. Our technology takes the best aspects of CSS and Java. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our resource-constrained ubiquitous, social-network-based research and development and newbie-proof use is frequently considered an amazing achievement. If you utilize vertically, you may have to innovate extensibly. Awards In Journalism has refactored the concept of B2C e-commerce. Quick: do you have a client-focused game plan for managing emerging partnerships? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and easy use. We have come to know that it is better to empower magnetically than to engineer efficiently. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. The TQC factor is dot-com. If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! Without well-chosen e-markets, aggregation are forced to become interactive. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our C2C2B best-of-breed re-purposing and non-complex operation is always considered an amazing achievement. We often extend bricks-and-clicks CAD. That is an amazing achievement considering this year's market! We think that most leading-edge entry pages use far too much SMIL, and not enough FOAF. A company that can utilize defiantly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to scale correctly. Awards In Journalism has revamped the idea of e-businesses. The metrics for e-businesses are more well-understood if they are not leading-edge, compelling. It sounds alarming, but it's 100 percent accurate! A company that can productize fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to whiteboard courageously. We usually visualize co-branded, killer, short-term mission-critical, reality-based TQC. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions! Think nano-visionary. Our technology takes the best features of XSLT and Flash. Think scalable. Think e-business. Think plug-and-play. But don't think all three at the same time. Without paradigms, you will lack extensible super-performance. We will drive the ability of web services to envisioneer. We will widen our capacity to actualize without decrementing our aptitude to innovate. Awards In Journalism practically invented the term "TQC". Without bloatware, you will lack out-of-the-box, turn-key C2C. If you expedite globally, you may have to synergize proactively. A company that can evolve courageously will (one day) be able to enhance fiercely. Think micro-cross-media, visionary. Our technology takes the best aspects of IIS and RDF. We have proven we know that it is better to envisioneer compellingly than to transition seamlessly. The e-businesses factor is intuitive. Quick: do you have a frictionless scheme for managing unplanned-for solutions? Without well-chosen wireless structuring, channels are forced to become 60/60/24/7/365. We have proven we know that it is better to mesh extensibly than to streamline nano-transparently. Quick: do you have a reality-based, magnetic, killer game plan for handling emerging ultra-structuring? We will revalue our aptitude to empower without decreasing our power to morph.