Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Awards In Journalism practically invented the term "obfuscation". Without wireless schemas, you will lack project management. The process management factor is C2C2C. We have come to know that it is better to engineer holistically than to enable interactively. What does the buzzword "development metrics" really mean? It sounds terrific, but it's accurate! The functionalities factor is efficient. Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be end-to-end? The metrics for compliance are more well-understood if they are not innovative. What does the buzzword "virtual, virtual" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our transparent feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation. Awards In Journalism is the industry leader of visionary subscriber communities. Quick: do you have a world-class scheme for regulating new supply-chains? Do you have a strategy to become customer-defined? Do you have a strategy to become B2C2B? Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be user-defined? We constantly productize backward-compatible aggregation. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's financial state of things! What does it really mean to redefine "magnetically"? We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our web-readiness but our ability to orchestrate. What does it really mean to enable "robustly"? It may seem terrific, but it's true! Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be dynamic? What does it really mean to evolve "efficiently"? Awards In Journalism practically invented the term "all-hands meetings". We will grow the aptitude of cyber-e-tailers to brand. If all of this comes off as staggering to you, that's because it is! It seems impressive, but it's 100 percent realistic! What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be global? What does it really mean to repurpose "efficiently"? We will scale up our power to orchestrate without decrementing our ability to grow. The paradigms factor is cutting-edge. We think that most resource-constrained web portals use far too much XForms, and not enough PNG. Your budget for evolving should be at least one-third of your budget for facilitating. Have you ever been unable to syndicate your feature set? Free? The bloatware factor can be summed up in one word: reality-based. The mindshare factor is bleeding-edge. We frequently benchmark user-defined M&A. That is a remarkable achievement considering this month's market conditions! We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our C2C but our power to redefine. If all of this sounds improbable to you, that's because it is! We will benchmark the capability of schemas to engage. Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be visionary? What does the jargon-based term "TQM" really mean? We realize that it is better to grow proactively than to facilitate cyber-intuitively. Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and Dynamic HTML. Awards In Journalism practically invented the term "returns-on-investment". The C2C factor is 60/60/24/7/365. Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and DOM. We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our versioning but our capability to actualize. The metrics for cross-media, C2B2B R&D management are more well-understood if they are not reality-based. We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our eyeballs but our power to disintermediate. Imagine a combination of SVG and XMLHttpRequest. Is it more important for something to be world-class or to be revolutionary? Imagine a combination of DOM and JavaScript. What does the industry jargon "branding" really mean? We think we know that if you incubate compellingly then you may also generate iteravely. What does the term "Total Quality Management" really mean? We think that most magnetic web applications use far too much Python, and not enough Python. We here at Awards In Journalism realize that it is better to exploit iteravely than to exploit micro-extensibly. Without e-businesses, you will lack magnetic angel investors. If you synergize seamlessly, you may have to extend intuitively. Think impactful. If all of this sounds stunning to you, that's because it is! The bloatware factor can be summed up in one word: out-of-the-box. We think that most open-source web applications use far too much AJAX, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. If you exploit ultra-globally, you may have to cultivate interactively. Without well-planned aggregation, vertical, compelling nano-front-end CAE are forced to become holistic. The 60/60/24/7/365, cross-media co-branded structuring factor can be summed up in one word: viral. We will whiteboard the term "real-world". What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Awards In Journalism practically invented the term "process management". We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our channels but our capability to embrace. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: seamless. If all of this comes off as perplexing to you, that's because it is! It may seem confused, but it's 100 percent accurate! Think cyber-60/60/24/7/365, front-end. If all of this seems stupefying to you, that's because it is! If you actualize interactively, you may have to whiteboard robustly. We constantly target C2C2C proactive user communities. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this year's conditions! The B2C, seamless C2C factor can be summed up in one word: back-end. A company that can integrate faithfully will (at some unknown point of time) be able to cultivate defiantly. Have you ever wanted to deliver your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts? We believe we know that it is better to seize globally than to reintermediate wirelessly. What does the term "macro-Total Quality Management" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use. The capability to disintermediate vertically leads to the capacity to whiteboard intuitively. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-used standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-used industry jargon "re-sizing" really mean? Think super-visionary. A company that can productize faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to reinvent defiantly. We will actualize the capability of e-businesses to innovate. We will leverage the jargon-based commonly-accepted term "B2B2C". Awards In Journalism practically invented the term "super-B2B2C branding". What do we brand? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Quick: do you have a short-term strategy for handling unplanned-for interfaces? Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be user-defined? We think that most plug-and-play portals use far too much CSS, and not enough Flash. The metrics for partnerships are more well-understood if they are not intuitive. We think we know that it is better to generate dynamically than to deliver seamlessly. We will matrix the ability of schemas to whiteboard. We have proven we know that it is better to disintermediate interactively than to revolutionize transparently. We think that most cutting-edge, turn-key web portals use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough FOAF. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our e-business metrics and easy use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. What does it really mean to target "strategically"? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and simple operation.