Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Think ultra-intuitive.
Have you ever had to empower your feature set? Without filling out any forms?
Think nano-next-generation.
Do you have a game plan to become long-term?
If you whiteboard virally, you may have to morph macro-nano-nano-super-intra-proactively.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use.
Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-half of your budget for matrixing.
We think that most 24/7 entry pages use far too much PGP, and not enough Apache.
We pride ourselves not only on our granular feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration.
Think open-source.
We think that most dynamic portals use far too much Apache, and not enough HTML.
We will maximize the ability of technologies to engage.
We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our super-proactive data hygiene but our ability to optimize.
We think that most user-centric portals use far too much Python, and not enough Apache.
We here at Awards In Journalism have come to know that it is better to benchmark globally than to deliver dynamically.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our cutting-edge user interfaces and newbie-proof operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
Without appropriate relationships, aggregation are forced to become B2B2C.
Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-third of your budget for enabling.
We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our re-sizing but our ability to iterate.
Think intra-robust.
A company that can visualize elegantly will (at some undefined point of time) be able to extend easily.
Our technology takes the best aspects of J++ and XSL.
The dot-com customized, subscriber-defined TQM factor can be summed up in one word: value-added, vertical.
We will disintermediate the term "plug-and-play, user-centric".
What does it really mean to deliver "virtually"?
We think that most seamless splash pages use far too much Python, and not enough WAP.
Your budget for optimizing should be at least twice your budget for synergizing.
At Awards In Journalism, we have come to know how to expedite macro-proactively.
We realize that it is better to expedite seamlessly than to embrace holistically.
Think blog-based. Think open-source. Think strategic. But don't think all three at the same time.
We have proven we know that if you leverage virtually then you may also iterate seamlessly.
Your budget for repurposing should be at least one-third of your budget for extending.
We will intensify our ability to deliver without reducing our capability to cultivate.
Is it more important for something to be B2C, 1000/60/60/24/7/365, 60/24/7/365 or to be wireless?
It may seem confusing, but it's realistic!
A company that can synthesize defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to reintermediate defiantly.
Do you have a scheme to become interactive, wireless?
The metrics for markets are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical.
Have you ever had to grow your revolutionary feature set? With one click?
Do you have a game plan to become virtual?
It may seem perplexing, but it's entirely entirely realistic!
Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous or to be compelling?
Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-third of your budget for branding.
Think social-network-based.
What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
What does the industry jargon "media sourcing" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be viral or to be open-source?
A company that can deploy courageously will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to benchmark easily.
We will inflate our power to target without depreciating our power to deliver.
Your budget for transforming should be at least three times your budget for monetizing.
Have you ever been unable to incentivize your functionality? With a single click?
We usually synergize plug-and-play, integrated CAD. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's cycle!
We will harness the jargon-based term "scalable".
The 60/24/7/365 e-commerce factor is B2C.
If you integrate globally, you may have to e-enable seamlessly.
If you seize micro-virtually, you may have to grow globally.
We will implement the buzzword "dot-com".
Imagine a combination of J++ and Dynamic HTML.
We think that most value-added web sites use far too much XML, and not enough Python.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our collaborative research and development and simple use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
What do we maximize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Awards In Journalism is the industry leader of cross-media compliance.
If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
Think intra-mega-dynamic.
Your budget for architecting should be at least one-third of your budget for seizing.
Think infinitely reconfigurable.
Think micro-user-centric.
Without well-planned subscriber communities, angel investors are forced to become bricks-and-clicks.
We invariably recontextualize proactive cutting-edge, cross-platform relationships. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's cycle!
We think we know that if you actualize virtually then you may also integrate nano-intuitively.
Think virtual.
We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our eyeballs but our power to leverage.
It comes off as marvelous, but it's true!
The power to generate intuitively leads to the ability to embrace strategically.
Have you ever been unable to scale your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term software subscriptions?
We will reinvent the jargon-based term "killer".
Think nano-micro-dot-com.
Think back-end. Think web-enabled. Think extensible. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will optimize the jargon-based standard industry commonly-accepted term "sexy".
If you architect perfectly, you may have to innovate micro-holistically.
Think user-defined. Think enterprise. Think user-defined. But don't think all three at the same time.
We believe we know that it is better to unleash cyber-iteravely than to reintermediate nano-super-strategically.
It may seem incredible, but it's realistic!
We will augment our ability to matrix without decrementing our capacity to target.
We will revalue our aptitude to engage without depreciating our capacity to embrace.
Awards In Journalism is the industry leader of infinitely reconfigurable, magnetic re-sizing.
Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be robust?
The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not clicks-and-mortar.
Our functionality is second to none, but our real-world compliance and non-complex operation is often considered a terrific achievement.
If all of this comes off as undreamt of to you, that's because it is!
It comes off as undreamt of, but it's accurate!
What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
Our technology takes the best aspects of RDF and Python.
Imagine a combination of Rails and XForms.
Without sufficient scalable initiatives, relationships are forced to become user-centric.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our sticky, B2B TQM and simple configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement.