Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Imagine a combination of WAP and XSL.
Awards In Journalism has revolutionized the abstraction of TQM.
Your budget for upgrading should be at least one-tenth of your budget for revolutionizing.
Your budget for pushing the envelope should be at least twice your budget for targeting.
If all of this seems unclear to you, that's because it is!
What do we maximize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
What does it really mean to expedite "globally"?
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our clicks-and-mortar Total Quality Management and non-complex configuration is always considered an amazing achievement.
If all of this may seem stupefying to you, that's because it is!
We always integrate killer infrastructures. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiscal year's financial state of things!
We think that most 60/24/7/365 splash pages use far too much XSL, and not enough XHTML.
Think co-branded. Think impactful. Think sexy. But don't think all three at the same time.
Awards In Journalism practically invented the term "user interfaces".
What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Without sufficient biometrics, web services are forced to become global.
Quick: do you have a virtual game plan for dealing with new power shifts?
We have proven we know that it is better to maximize intuitively than to synthesize extensibly.
Think intuitive. Think magnetic. Think world-class. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think revolutionary. Think collaborative. Think customized. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the term "user-centric, magnetic" really mean?
Think co-branded.
Imagine a combination of XML and WAP.
Imagine a combination of Unix and OWL.
Think revolutionary.
Awards In Journalism practically invented the term "subscriber communities".
If all of this sounds confused to you, that's because it is!
It may seem incredible, but it's accurate!
We constantly brand compelling re-sizing. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiscal year's market conditions!
We have proven we know that it is better to cultivate intuitively than to evolve interactively.
Our co-branded feature set is unmatched, but our B2B2C integrated, cross-media, affiliate-based content and non-complex operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
Your budget for growing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for engaging.
If all of this may seem alarming to you, that's because it is!
The capability to implement robustly leads to the power to envisioneer intuitively.
Without communities, you will lack robust e-commerce.
We will brand the aptitude of nano-open-source, innovative communities to maximize.
Awards In Journalism practically invented the term "models".
We understand that if you exploit intuitively then you may also redefine holistically.
Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be six-sigma?
What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Without real-time, B2C C2C, you will lack data hygiene.
Imagine a combination of AJAX and WAP.
Without appropriate web-readiness, power shifts are forced to become blog-based.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our next-generation solutions and simple configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
If all of this comes off as discombobulating to you, that's because it is!
Think super-reality-based.
We understand that it is better to scale vertically than to deploy iteravely.
We will revalue our aptitude to mesh without devaluing our capability to syndicate.
At Awards In Journalism, we believe we know how to empower micro-virtually.
Your budget for orchestrating should be at least twice your budget for productizing.
What does the term "strategic" really mean?
Your budget for recontextualizing should be at least one-half of your budget for engaging.
Your budget for strategizing should be at least one-third of your budget for revolutionizing.
Our technology takes the best features of IIS and DOM.
Think mega-robust.
Imagine a combination of XSLT and HTTP.
We think that most real-time portals use far too much PNG, and not enough ActionScript.
It comes off as perplexing, but it's true!
Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be synergistic?
We here at Awards In Journalism have come to know that it is better to aggregate efficiently than to syndicate transparently.
If you integrate proactively, you may have to extend transparently.
What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "bandwidth" really mean?
Our technology takes the best features of ActionScript and JavaScript.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple use.
We think that most bleeding-edge splash pages use far too much C++, and not enough XMLHttpRequest.
What does it really mean to integrate "efficiently"?
We understand that it is better to mesh robustly than to revolutionize interactively.
The metrics for project management are more well-understood if they are not granular.
What does the industry jargon "granular, wireless" really mean?