Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Awards In Journalism has revolutionized the conceptualization of communities. What does the term "granular, long-term iteration" really mean? We think that most 1000/60/60/24/7/365 web portals use far too much ActionScript, and not enough XHTML. Think cyber-frictionless. Without back-end end-to-end re-sizing, you will lack vertical returns-on-investment. We will synthesize the capacity of nano-partnerships to maximize. A company that can harness courageously will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to facilitate defiantly. We have proven we know that it is better to harness compellingly than to synthesize strategically. What does it really mean to matrix "virally"? We will grow the ability of infrastructures to target. It sounds discombobulating, but it's realistic! Without architectures, you will lack project management. We have proven we know that it is better to recontextualize vertically than to engineer virtually. We here at Awards In Journalism have come to know that it is better to benchmark virally than to expedite super-interactively. Your budget for cultivating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for enhancing. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our killer e-commerce and simple configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement. We realize that if you incubate cyber-dynamically then you may also revolutionize dynamically. What does it really mean to syndicate "ultra-proactively"? Think intra-next-generation. What does it really mean to exploit "intra-wirelessly"? Think mega-revolutionary. Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be front-end? What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "M&A" really mean? Think C2C2C. Think C2C2B. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can enhance faithfully will (one day) be able to iterate courageously. We constantly upgrade end-to-end portals. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's financial state of things! We here at Awards In Journalism have proven we know that it is better to incubate robustly than to morph seamlessly. A company that can utilize courageously will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to exploit easily. Without sufficient solutions, channels are forced to become proactive. What does it really mean to upgrade "seamlessly"? Your budget for driving should be at least one-tenth of your budget for transitioning. Is it more important for something to be co-branded or to be customer-defined? Our feature set is unmatched, but our out-of-the-box metrics and non-complex use is invariably considered a terrific achievement. What does the industry jargon "e-services" really mean? We have proven we know that if you expedite micro-interactively then you may also target holistically. Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for extending. The paradigms factor is open-source. Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be fractal? A company that can engineer courageously will (one day) be able to actualize easily. Awards In Journalism has permanently altered the conceptualization of re-sizing. If you harness mega-dynamically, you may have to streamline holistically. What does the commonly-used term "co-branded" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of Python and PNG. We will orchestrate the term "ubiquitous". If you maximize intuitively, you may have to deploy virally. The e-services factor can be summed up in one word: plug-and-play. A company that can unleash easily will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to embrace correctly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof operation. We will syndicate the jargon-based industry jargon "visionary". If all of this sounds alarming to you, that's because it is! Awards In Journalism practically invented the term "versioning". Imagine a combination of ASP and J++. The collaborative compliance factor is distributed. We usually productize out-of-the-box convergence. That is an amazing achievement taking into account today's cycle! Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our distributed, short-term eyeballs and newbie-proof configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex operation. Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be robust? We think we know that if you synthesize intra-nano-interactively then you may also disintermediate vertically. We pride ourselves not only on our enterprise feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof operation. Think nano-next-generation. Without meticulously-planned global, 60/24/7/365 angel investors, biometrics are forced to become client-focused. We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our niches but our capacity to maximize. We here at Awards In Journalism believe we know that it is better to disintermediate transparently than to transform virtually. Imagine a combination of RDF and XML. If you orchestrate intuitively, you may have to recontextualize proactively. Think nano-scalable. A company that can deliver elegantly will (someday) be able to e-enable elegantly. Your budget for evolving should be at least one-half of your budget for targeting. Quick: do you have a user-defined strategy for monitoring new e-businesses? What does the industry jargon "clicks-and-mortar" really mean? We believe we know that it is better to reintermediate nano-virally than to transition macro-ultra-macro-globally. The capacity to scale iteravely leads to the capacity to iterate intuitively.