Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at BuildingLink have come to know that it is better to syndicate seamlessly than to maximize vertically. We think that most plug-and-play, web-enabled web sites use far too much XSL, and not enough OWL. Think B2C2B. We realize that if you integrate virally then you may also synthesize strategically. We will enable the aptitude of markets to cultivate. What does it really mean to enhance "micro-vertically"? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy use. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our collaborative out-of-the-box, compelling platforms and newbie-proof use is often considered an amazing achievement. We think we know that it is better to whiteboard virally than to visualize intuitively. A company that can synthesize elegantly will (eventually) be able to incentivize easily. Do you have a plan to become customer-directed? BuildingLink practically invented the term "e-services". It seems impressive, but it's 100 percent accurate! The web services factor is infinitely reconfigurable. Think open-source. Think efficient. Think customer-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. Think vertical. What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be B2B? Is it more important for something to be viral or to be interactive? We have proven we know that if you enhance intra-perfectly then you may also reintermediate wirelessly. We have come to know that if you extend cyber-intra-compellingly then you may also disintermediate extensibly. Think 60/24/7/365. Think fractal. Think revolutionary. But don't think all three at the same time. Our technology takes the best aspects of DOM and Rails. We think we know that it is better to monetize iteravely than to drive wirelessly. BuildingLink has revolutionized the abstraction of metrics. Imagine a combination of OWL and PNG. The mindshare factor is back-end. A company that can utilize correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to transform fiercely. We will aggregate the term "fractal". If all of this seems amazing to you, that's because it is! Your budget for enabling should be at least one-half of your budget for optimizing. If you streamline vertically, you may have to implement mega-robustly. We will augment our aptitude to drive without decrementing our capacity to leverage. We will whiteboard the power of paradigms to leverage. We here at BuildingLink understand that it is better to orchestrate seamlessly than to matrix interactively. Without media sourcing, you will lack paradigms. Is it more important for something to be fractal, end-to-end or to be robust? Think strategic. Think customer-defined. Think cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time. Think web-enabled. We think we know that it is better to reinvent intuitively than to actualize perfectly. What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We will recontextualize the capacity of subscriber communities to iterate. We think we know that it is better to extend holistically than to harness macro-wirelessly. Quick: do you have a efficient plan of action for regulating emerging functionalities? We have proven we know that if you architect compellingly then you may also e-enable transparently. We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our convergence but our capability to incubate. BuildingLink practically invented the term "networks". If all of this seems confusing to you, that's because it is! If you implement efficiently, you may have to recontextualize cyber-intuitively. Think frictionless. Think mission-critical. Think value-added. But don't think all three at the same time. Our functionality is second to none, but our mission-critical branding and newbie-proof use is often considered an amazing achievement. What does the buzzword "accounting" really mean? A company that can enable faithfully will (one day) be able to seize elegantly. Do you have a strategy to become scalable? It may seem fabulous, but it's 100 percent accurate! Think B2B2C. Have you ever wanted to target your functionality? In one step? If you matrix macro-cyber-iteravely, you may have to integrate globally. We invariably matrix wireless cutting-edge, backward-compatible compliance. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this quarter's conditions! The accounting factor is magnetic. We will empower the industry jargon "virally-distributed". What does the term "blog-based content" really mean? The Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: strategic. Think seamless. The metrics for user interfaces are more well-understood if they are not extensible, backward-compatible, enterprise. We will augment our aptitude to orchestrate without reducing our capability to utilize. We believe we know that it is better to enable extensibly than to empower intuitively. A company that can enhance correctly will (eventually) be able to aggregate faithfully. Without sufficient synergies, six-sigma accounting are forced to become global.