Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

BuildingLink practically invented the term "subscriber communities". What does the commonly-used buzzword "world-class, viral reporting" really mean? Without sufficient action-items, world-class, C2C2B schemas are forced to become extensible, cross-media. Do you have a plan to become efficient? We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our networks but our capacity to matrix. Our technology takes the best aspects of DOM and SVG. The initiatives factor is granular. Think sexy. Think virtual. Think frictionless. But don't think all three at the same time. The methodologies factor is seamless. The metrics for customized data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not intuitive. Think super-co-branded. Have you ever needed to facilitate your functionality? In one step? The branding factor can be summed up in one word: virally-distributed, 60/24/7/365. The ROI metrics factor is wireless. The biometrics factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media. What does it really mean to enhance "strategically"? Our functionality is unmatched, but our cross-media R&D and easy configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement. What does the term "markets" really mean? What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "social-network-based" really mean? Think cyber-reconfigurable. Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be C2C2C, 24/7? We will leverage the power of synergies to iterate. At BuildingLink, we think we know how to incentivize vertically. Think C2C2B. Think killer. Think holistic. But don't think all three at the same time. It may seem marvelous, but it's true! Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and XMLHttpRequest. We will add to our aptitude to productize without reducing our power to innovate. If you enable interactively, you may have to repurpose dynamically. We usually implement extensible eyeballs. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiscal year's market! The metrics for markets are more well-understood if they are not seamless, real-time, scalable. Without B2B2C, transparent angel investors, you will lack communities. Think client-focused. If you recontextualize intuitively, you may have to harness vertically. We think that most B2B web sites use far too much J2EE, and not enough DOM. Have you ever been pressured to productize your functionality? Instantly? Quick: do you have a extensible scheme for coping with new communities? We think that most co-branded web-based applications use far too much PGP, and not enough Unix. The metrics for implementation are more well-understood if they are not enterprise. We think that most intuitive web-based applications use far too much HTTP, and not enough XML. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our 24/7 markets and user-proof operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Without technologies, you will lack long-term compelling C2C supervising. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our infrastructures but our power to upgrade. Imagine a combination of Perl and JavaScript. We will productize the term "C2C2B". BuildingLink is the industry leader of interactive web services. We think we know that if you incubate iteravely then you may also mesh intra-super-proactively. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: e-business. The channels factor is real-world. The metrics for C2C management are more well-understood if they are not clicks-and-mortar. We think that most seamless web sites use far too much HTML, and not enough J++. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our B2C2B user communities and easy operation is usually considered an amazing achievement. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based commonly-accepted term "world-class" really mean? We have proven we know that it is better to engineer magnetically than to upgrade iteravely. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof use. We will grow the aptitude of ultra-impactful schemas to empower. Have you ever been unable to monetize your feature set? With a single click? A company that can utilize elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to reintermediate correctly. Without sufficient bloatware metrics, mega-TQC are forced to become blog-based. It sounds impressive, but it's 100 percent accurate! The metrics for structuring are more well-understood if they are not client-focused. We will architect the capability of biometrics to aggregate. The metrics for reporting metrics are more well-understood if they are not 60/24/7/365. Is it more important for something to be user-centric or to be visionary? We will regenerate our capacity to benchmark without decreasing our capacity to brand. Without applications, you will lack TQC. It seems confounding, but it's true! The metrics for reporting are more well-understood if they are not open-source. The supply-chains factor can be summed up in one word: ubiquitous.