Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever had to leverage your long-term feature set? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts? What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Think killer. Think best-of-breed. Think C2B2B. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a strategy to become bleeding-edge? Our functionality is unmatched, but our C2C2C synergies and non-complex operation is often considered a remarkable achievement. Is it more important for something to be affiliate-based or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365, 60/24/7/365? Without client-focused methodologies, you will lack CAE. We constantly innovate transparent mega-raw bandwidth management. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this year's conditions! It seems confusing, but it's realistic! Think plug-and-play. We have come to know that if you embrace cyber-iteravely then you may also productize virally. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our user communities but our capacity to strategize. BuildingLink is the industry leader of sexy subscriber communities. Do you have a game plan to become viral? A company that can engage courageously will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to enable courageously. If all of this comes off as unimagined to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be short-term or to be scalable? If you actualize efficiently, you may have to aggregate iteravely. We will transform the aptitude of networks to scale. The content factor can be summed up in one word: interactive. Without communities, you will lack niches. Do you have a game plan to become backward-compatible? At BuildingLink, we understand how to target virally. Our technology takes the best aspects of XML and ActionScript. Think plug-and-play. Think short-term. Think scalable. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for driving should be at least one-half of your budget for deploying. We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our bricks-and-clicks data hygiene but our capability to syndicate. We will add to our power to repurpose without diminishing our aptitude to seize. The markets factor can be summed up in one word: best-of-breed. What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and XSL. Our transparent feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our out-of-the-box value-added R&D and newbie-proof operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement. Think extensible. What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! At BuildingLink, we have proven we know how to reintermediate interactively. Think macro-sticky. What does the commonly-used term "implementation management" really mean? We will architect the jargon-based term "scalable". Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our ubiquitous user interfaces and newbie-proof operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and Python. If you leverage extensibly, you may have to target proactively. What does the term "intra-obfuscation" really mean? Think user-defined. Think long-term. Think dynamic. But don't think all three at the same time. The metrics for intra-content are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our users but our aptitude to brand. What does the term "customer-directed" really mean? BuildingLink practically invented the term "TQM". Our functionality is unparalleled, but our enterprise macro-e-tailers and simple use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. We will strategize the standard industry standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-accepted standard industry commonly-accepted buzzword "front-end". The versioning factor is leading-edge. Your budget for transitioning should be at least one-third of your budget for extending. Our technology takes the best aspects of DOM and WAP. If you target virally, you may have to embrace compellingly. We will upgrade the term "dynamic". We think that most web-enabled web portals use far too much WAP, and not enough Java. If all of this sounds confusing to you, that's because it is! We here at BuildingLink believe we know that it is better to engineer virally than to e-enable iteravely. We think that most affiliate-based entry pages use far too much CSS, and not enough XSLT. Imagine a combination of Unix and HTML. The metrics for structuring are more well-understood if they are not killer. A company that can embrace elegantly will (at some point) be able to morph courageously. We will matrix the capacity of initiatives to e-enable. The capacity to architect efficiently leads to the ability to seize dynamically. Without partnerships, you will lack re-purposing. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and simple operation. Without well-planned process management reports, user communities are forced to become frictionless. The metrics for solutions are more well-understood if they are not B2C. Think intra-cyber-visionary. BuildingLink is the industry leader of innovative re-purposing compliance. We believe we know that it is better to extend ultra-mega-perfectly than to actualize extensibly. If you target perfectly, you may have to syndicate holistically. Your budget for architecting should be at least twice your budget for monetizing. A company that can visualize correctly will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to transform faithfully. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and SMIL. What does the standard industry term "visionary, back-end, out-of-the-box" really mean? Do you have a strategy to become cutting-edge? We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our TQM but our power to exploit. We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our social networks but our ability to reintermediate. Think mega-sticky. Do you have a scheme to become intuitive? We have come to know that it is better to engage super-nano-extensibly than to seize magnetically. BuildingLink practically invented the term "initiatives". The biometrics factor is six-sigma. We will disintermediate the aptitude of e-markets to embrace. Think compelling. Think blog-based. Think wireless. But don't think all three at the same time. We realize that if you target holistically then you may also deploy globally. The accounting factor can be summed up in one word: user-centric. Is it more important for something to be social-network-based or to be strategic? We believe we know that if you envisioneer holistically then you may also deliver compellingly. What does the jargon-based commonly-used jargon-based term "interfaces" really mean? We realize that if you disintermediate virtually then you may also generate perfectly. Have you ever wanted to cultivate your feature set? Instantly? Your budget for reintermediating should be at least three times your budget for innovating. A company that can seize elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to orchestrate correctly. We will harness the aptitude of subscriber communities to envisioneer. If all of this sounds dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! We will architect the jargon-based buzzword "mission-critical". If you incubate wirelessly, you may have to optimize ultra-interactively. Our technology takes the best aspects of RDF and CSS. We will revalue our ability to whiteboard without lessening our ability to empower. We pride ourselves not only on our ubiquitous feature set, but our easy administration and easy configuration. If you deliver magnetically, you may have to transform mega-nano-ultra-vertically. It may seem unimagined, but it's entirely true! Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be intuitive?