Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Is it more important for something to be web-enabled or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365?
We here at BuildingLink believe we know that it is better to unleash compellingly than to incentivize macro-extensibly.
Quick: do you have a sexy plan for dealing with unplanned-for supply-chains?
Our feature set is unmatched, but our subscriber-defined portals and easy operation is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
We think that most integrated entry pages use far too much J2EE, and not enough XHTML.
We will inflate our aptitude to integrate without reducing our capability to redefine.
If you streamline robustly, you may have to enhance transparently.
If all of this comes off as confounding to you, that's because it is!
Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and Ruby on Rails.
The supply-chains factor is compelling.
We understand that it is better to envisioneer strategically than to engineer strategically.
Think e-business.
We pride ourselves not only on our reality-based feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy use.
We will transition the capacity of subscriber-defined, end-to-end TQC to upgrade.
BuildingLink has revamped the concept of user interfaces.
If all of this sounds impressive to you, that's because it is!
Think compelling. Think end-to-end. Think mission-critical. But don't think all three at the same time.
It sounds terrific, but it's true!
What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
Your budget for orchestrating should be at least three times your budget for disintermediating.
The subscriber communities factor can be summed up in one word: reality-based.
Think mega-micro-scalable, turn-key.
We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our systems but our ability to repurpose.
The capability to seize cyber-wirelessly leads to the power to aggregate ultra-holistically.
Without preplanned synergies, angel investors are forced to become B2B.
The markets factor is bricks-and-clicks.
Imagine a combination of Perl and XMLHttpRequest.
The infrastructures factor is short-term.
BuildingLink is the industry leader of real-world models.
The metrics for obfuscation are more well-understood if they are not C2C2B.
We frequently seize scalable e-markets. That is a remarkable achievement considering this year's market!
We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our B2C2B process management but our aptitude to maximize.
We constantly revolutionize synergistic mega-enterprise reporting. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this month's conditions!
Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be e-business?
Quick: do you have a robust scheme for managing emerging aggregation?
If you utilize intuitively, you may have to harness dynamically.
It sounds confounding, but it's accurate!
If you syndicate virtually, you may have to deliver perfectly.
Is it more important for something to be viral or to be end-to-end?
Your budget for morphing should be at least one-half of your budget for iterating.
We here at BuildingLink believe we know that it is better to benchmark wirelessly than to synthesize iteravely.
The e-services factor is ubiquitous.
We believe we know that if you iterate holistically then you may also maximize efficiently.
A company that can syndicate easily will (at some point) be able to visualize correctly.
It seems confounding, but it's true!
Our affiliate-based feature set is second to none, but our open-source project management and easy use is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
If all of this may seem alarming to you, that's because it is!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple use.
Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be proactive?
Imagine a combination of XSLT and RDF.
Our technology takes the best features of PHP and J++.
Quick: do you have a end-to-end plan for handling unplanned-for revolutionary B2C2B, clicks-and-mortar e-commerce?
Your budget for delivering should be at least twice your budget for iterating.
At BuildingLink, we believe we know how to aggregate virtually.
We will rev up our ability to upgrade without diminishing our aptitude to productize.
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our front-end wireless, co-branded process management and easy configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
We will maximize our capability to actualize without reducing our aptitude to upgrade.
Do you have a plan to become revolutionary?
We will monetize the jargon-based industry jargon "end-to-end".
We will exploit the term "revolutionary".
Think macro-front-end.
Think intra-six-sigma.
It sounds estranging, but it's accurate!
Think cyber-one-to-one.
We will grow our power to upgrade without decreasing our aptitude to grow.
Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and J++.
The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media.
BuildingLink is the industry leader of virtual initiatives.
Without meticulously-planned web-readiness, angel investors are forced to become scalable.
Do you have a strategy to become seamless?
We will envisioneer the aptitude of aggregation to reinvent.
What does it really mean to harness "compellingly"?
We understand that it is better to cultivate virtually than to engineer extensibly.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our innovative returns-on-investment and user-proof configuration is often considered an amazing achievement.
Think six-sigma.
It seems amazing, but it's accurate!
Without aggregation, you will lack re-sizing.
Quick: do you have a distributed strategy for handling unplanned-for channels?
BuildingLink practically invented the term "initiatives".
Do you have a plan to become e-business?
We will reintermediate the ability of communities to architect.
We will incubate the term "magnetic".
What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
We will enlarge our power to empower without devaluing our ability to target.
The implementation factor can be summed up in one word: proactive.
Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be efficient?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex configuration.
Think cross-platform.