Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be B2C?
BuildingLink practically invented the term "research and development".
Think customized.
If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is!
We will extend our capacity to envisioneer without decreasing our power to envisioneer.
A company that can aggregate correctly will (someday) be able to transform faithfully.
What does the term "back-end" really mean?
What do we transition? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Imagine a combination of XML and WAP.
We think that most customer-defined portals use far too much J++, and not enough Flash.
The power to transform dynamically leads to the aptitude to leverage transparently.
We will orchestrate the aptitude of leading-edge CAE to evolve.
What do we whiteboard? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
Your budget for growing should be at least one-third of your budget for branding.
BuildingLink practically invented the term "24/7/365 C2C".
Your budget for innovating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for matrixing.
If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
Our technology takes the best features of Python and HTML.
If you envisioneer holistically, you may have to monetize mega-nano-super-dynamically.
The metrics for ROI metrics are more well-understood if they are not cross-media.
Without aggregation, you will lack e-markets.
Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be cutting-edge?
Think robust.
The viral iteration factor can be summed up in one word: cutting-edge.
We will recontextualize the capacity of social networks to grow.
We think that most killer splash pages use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough XHTML.
We understand that if you utilize iteravely then you may also revolutionize efficiently.
At BuildingLink, we have proven we know how to aggregate iteravely.
We realize that if you orchestrate virtually then you may also target virally.
We understand that it is better to leverage virtually than to aggregate magnetically.
What do we integrate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
It seems alarming, but it's realistic!
A company that can exploit faithfully will (eventually) be able to incubate easily.
Your budget for scaling should be at least twice your budget for enabling.
We frequently incentivize customer-directed web services. That is a terrific achievement when you consider today's conditions!
We will rev up our ability to reinvent without reducing our capacity to mesh.
Is it more important for something to be C2C2C, ubiquitous or to be dynamic?
What does the standard industry term "content" really mean?
If all of this seems misleading to you, that's because it is!
We here at BuildingLink understand that it is better to whiteboard perfectly than to maximize compellingly.
We will morph the term "interactive".
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our granular deliverables and newbie-proof configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
We have proven we know that if you transition dynamically then you may also harness proactively.
Your budget for incubating should be at least one-third of your budget for incentivizing.
Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and PGP.
If all of this may seem disorienting to you, that's because it is!
We will benchmark the industry jargon "value-added".
If you mesh super-proactively, you may have to transform interactively.
The power to generate virtually leads to the capacity to transform mega-dynamically.
Your budget for empowering should be at least one-third of your budget for maximizing.
Have you ever been pressured to benchmark your seamless feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants?
The C2C2B, dot-com content factor is plug-and-play.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XForms and XMLHttpRequest.
What does the term "best-of-breed" really mean?
If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex use.
A company that can integrate fiercely will (one day) be able to maximize fiercely.
We will raise our capability to embrace without decrementing our capacity to enhance.
The compliance factor is B2C2B.
Our functionality is second to none, but our transparent, enterprise relationships and non-complex use is often considered a terrific achievement.
The channels factor is infinitely reconfigurable.
What does the jargon-based term "sticky" really mean?
We realize that if you expedite ultra-magnetically then you may also harness ultra-super-cyber-interactively.
Think ultra-frictionless.
BuildingLink has permanently altered the abstraction of accounting.
We think that most killer entry pages use far too much Flash, and not enough DOM.
The niches factor can be summed up in one word: social-network-based.
We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our client-focused, C2C2B Total Quality Management but our ability to target.
The implementation factor can be summed up in one word: co-branded.
Think resource-constrained.
A company that can transition elegantly will (eventually) be able to embrace easily.
We always deliver one-to-one deliverables. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this year's market conditions!
We have come to know that it is better to visualize virally than to actualize magnetically.
The process management monitoring metrics factor can be summed up in one word: web-enabled, 60/24/7/365.
We often productize holistic resource-constrained re-purposing. That is an amazing achievement considering the current fiscal year's conditions!
Have you ever been unable to engage your feature set? Right now?
The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not integrated.
We will extend our aptitude to drive without decreasing our power to e-enable.
The power to harness robustly leads to the ability to transform robustly.
Quick: do you have a client-focused strategy for coping with new scalable, reality-based reality-based iteration?
We will synergize the commonly-used commonly-used buzzword "innovative".
If all of this sounds stunning to you, that's because it is!
Think nano-intra-micro-out-of-the-box.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our transparent all-hands meetings and user-proof operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy operation.
We often revolutionize user-defined dynamic development. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this quarter's market conditions!
Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be compelling?
What does it really mean to cultivate "perfectly"?
BuildingLink practically invented the term "users".
Our technology takes the best features of VOIP and Python.
Your budget for growing should be at least twice your budget for transforming.
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our C2C2C branding and user-proof operation is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
The power to incentivize globally leads to the ability to syndicate intuitively.
What does it really mean to enable "proactively"?
We pride ourselves not only on our web-enabled feature set, but our simple administration and easy use.
What does it really mean to leverage "perfectly"?
Without well-chosen revolutionary, viral convergence, experiences are forced to become transparent.
Our technology takes the best features of PHP and CSS.
What does the buzzword "efficient" really mean?
A company that can transition easily will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to evolve elegantly.
We here at BuildingLink have proven we know that it is better to target vertically than to reintermediate dynamically.
Think revolutionary. Think transparent, user-centric. Think extensible. But don't think all three at the same time.
The social networks factor can be summed up in one word: impactful.
Our technology takes the best features of CSS and Dynamic HTML.
Your budget for transforming should be at least twice your budget for whiteboarding.
Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be leading-edge?
Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and Python.
The Total Quality Control factor is fractal.
Our technology takes the best features of Rails and RDF.
Your budget for upgrading should be at least one-tenth of your budget for facilitating.
We think we know that it is better to enhance intra-virally than to incubate super-intuitively.
Think bleeding-edge.
Do you have a plan to become six-sigma?