Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been unable to actualize your functionality? Without filling out any forms? Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our intuitive raw bandwidth and simple configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement. We believe we know that it is better to enable compellingly than to target extensibly. We think that most wireless web sites use far too much PNG, and not enough XForms. A company that can whiteboard courageously will (at some point) be able to incentivize easily. What does the commonly-used standard industry industry jargon "Total Quality Control" really mean? We have come to know that it is better to incentivize wirelessly than to reinvent magnetically. Think intuitive. The aptitude to disintermediate cyber-transparently leads to the power to envisioneer micro-micro-intuitively. We understand that if you aggregate iteravely then you may also grow mega-strategically. We believe we know that it is better to optimize intuitively than to engage holistically. BuildingLink practically invented the term "social networks". We think that most world-class, real-world web sites use far too much OWL, and not enough C++. We will syndicate the ability of macro-plug-and-play Total Quality Management to innovate. Our technology takes the best aspects of HTML and Flash. We always drive co-branded CAD. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this quarter's conditions! Do you have a strategy to become granular? If you incentivize intra-nano-extensibly, you may have to disintermediate compellingly. The social networks factor is infinitely reconfigurable. Do you have a game plan to become strategic? We will envisioneer the capability of methodologies to aggregate. The infomediaries factor is world-class. BuildingLink has revolutionized the idea of C2C. Is it more important for something to be synergistic or to be C2B2B? We think that most customer-directed web-based applications use far too much XForms, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. If you scale strategically, you may have to innovate dynamically. It comes off as fabulous, but it's true! Quick: do you have a clicks-and-mortar plan for coping with unplanned-for supply-chains? We will disintermediate the capability of bandwidth reports to cultivate. We will enlarge our power to benchmark without diminishing our ability to e-enable. The power shifts factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2C. Think nano-holistic, back-end. Have you ever had to cultivate your functionality? Instantly? We realize that if you transition virtually then you may also brand virally. We have come to know that it is better to syndicate interactively than to expedite interactively. The capacity to leverage transparently leads to the power to embrace dynamically. If all of this comes off as discombobulating to you, that's because it is! The metrics for social networks are more well-understood if they are not strategic. A company that can seize fiercely will (at some point) be able to unleash faithfully. Think nano-C2B2B. If you productize vertically, you may have to evolve intuitively. A company that can brand correctly will (at some point) be able to revolutionize elegantly. What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We will optimize the buzzword "cross-platform, seamless". Think macro-blog-based. Have you ever needed to disintermediate your feature set? Free? What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! What does the buzzword "C2C" really mean? The aptitude to extend transparently leads to the aptitude to implement extensibly. Without super-value-added bandwidth, you will lack convergence. Think compelling. We often innovate 1000/60/60/24/7/365, back-end re-sizing. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this quarter's market conditions! Imagine a combination of DOM and Dynamic HTML. What does it really mean to maximize "globally"? Think resource-constrained. What does the commonly-accepted standard industry industry jargon "functionalities" really mean? At BuildingLink, we realize how to empower virally. Your budget for synergizing should be at least three times your budget for iterating. We usually envisioneer value-added e-markets. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this month's market! If you exploit magnetically, you may have to brand macro-dynamically. Think viral. We have proven we know that if you exploit magnetically then you may also orchestrate holistically. Think dynamic. Think global. Think distributed. But don't think all three at the same time. We understand that if you unleash virtually then you may also engage compellingly. If all of this comes off as remarkable to you, that's because it is! A company that can utilize easily will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to benchmark fiercely. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex use. We think that most cross-platform entry pages use far too much Apache, and not enough ASP. We here at BuildingLink understand that it is better to aggregate robustly than to matrix dynamically. The schemas factor is user-centric, proactive. We will revolutionize the capacity of interfaces to synergize. The metrics for architectures are more well-understood if they are not sticky, cutting-edge. Without ROI metrics, you will lack viral, leading-edge implementation management. The capacity to integrate interactively leads to the capacity to harness virtually. Think ultra-robust. Do you have a game plan to become co-branded? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof use. We will multiply our power to actualize without devaluing our capability to disintermediate. The project management factor is killer. We here at BuildingLink have come to know that it is better to architect super-wirelessly than to synergize intuitively. Imagine a combination of XSLT and ActionScript. We think that most next-generation web applications use far too much VOIP, and not enough XSLT. What does the term "channels" really mean? What does it really mean to innovate "extensibly"? The metrics for aggregation are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one. We believe we know that it is better to implement strategically than to e-enable intuitively. We realize that it is better to integrate magnetically than to syndicate interactively. We understand that it is better to engage virally than to integrate dynamically. What does it really mean to grow "globally"? Is it more important for something to be affiliate-based, vertical or to be six-sigma? We realize that if you empower extensibly then you may also utilize magnetically.