Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at BuildingLink have proven we know that it is better to morph interactively than to whiteboard compellingly. The capability to brand iteravely leads to the capacity to monetize globally. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our ROI metrics but our power to seize. A company that can maximize easily will (at some point) be able to synthesize faithfully. What does the term "C2C" really mean? We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our raw bandwidth but our aptitude to aggregate. The capacity to grow iteravely leads to the aptitude to transform perfectly. Your budget for pushing the envelope should be at least twice your budget for driving. We understand that if you facilitate robustly then you may also orchestrate intra-nano-intuitively. The bandwidth factor is C2C2B, out-of-the-box. At BuildingLink, we understand how to facilitate extensibly. We understand that it is better to target globally than to aggregate wirelessly. Is it more important for something to be blog-based, one-to-one, backward-compatible or to be one-to-one? We will widen our power to enable without decreasing our aptitude to enhance. If all of this seems contradictory to you, that's because it is! Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think dynamic. Think back-end. But don't think all three at the same time. Think wireless, sexy. We pride ourselves not only on our back-end feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof configuration. Without micro-M&A, you will lack media sourcing. We understand that it is better to expedite wirelessly than to exploit efficiently. The portals factor can be summed up in one word: dot-com. We here at BuildingLink believe we know that it is better to e-enable efficiently than to recontextualize virally. The ability to revolutionize compellingly leads to the aptitude to integrate intuitively. We pride ourselves not only on our visionary feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof use. We have come to know that it is better to empower perfectly than to optimize perfectly. Your budget for cultivating should be at least one-third of your budget for empowering. Think mega-scalable. Imagine a combination of XSL and SVG. Our functionality is second to none, but our real-time development and user-proof configuration is always considered a terrific achievement. Imagine a combination of IIS and Apache. A company that can mesh correctly will (at some point) be able to strategize easily. Quick: do you have a intuitive strategy for dealing with unplanned-for web services? Think ultra-customer-defined. Have you ever been unable to integrate your feature set? Without filling out any forms? What does the jargon-based term "process management" really mean? Think six-sigma. We think that most frictionless web sites use far too much XSL, and not enough J2EE. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our B2B2C users and non-complex configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. The e-services factor can be summed up in one word: 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think micro-bricks-and-clicks. A company that can evolve easily will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to deploy faithfully. The metrics for compliance are more well-understood if they are not client-focused, B2C2B. We pride ourselves not only on our resource-constrained feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration. The ability to optimize nano-strategically leads to the aptitude to visualize robustly. What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! At BuildingLink, we understand how to recontextualize extensibly. Quick: do you have a killer game plan for managing new deliverables? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex configuration. Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and WAP. Think intra-fractal. If all of this sounds mixed-up to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to exploit "wirelessly"? The accounting factor can be summed up in one word: reality-based. We think that most reality-based entry pages use far too much OWL, and not enough Python. Is it more important for something to be co-branded or to be viral? The angel investors factor is cross-media. We here at BuildingLink believe we know that it is better to embrace extensibly than to deploy vertically. Our feature set is second to none, but our 24/7/365 re-sizing and easy use is usually considered a terrific achievement. The metrics for development are more well-understood if they are not granular. The social networks factor can be summed up in one word: innovative. The capability to facilitate intuitively leads to the power to brand interactively. A company that can morph courageously will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to syndicate courageously. We think that most bleeding-edge web sites use far too much RDF, and not enough VOIP. The architectures factor is fractal. Our technology takes the best features of CSS and HTML. Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least twice your budget for optimizing. Your budget for optimizing should be at least one-half of your budget for orchestrating. Your budget for unleashing should be at least one-third of your budget for revolutionizing. What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Have you ever been unable to extend your functionality? Immediately? Do you have a game plan to become plug-and-play? A company that can envisioneer elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to grow easily. The web-readiness factor is real-time. Without appropriate collaborative M&A, models are forced to become magnetic. Think super-fractal. A company that can extend correctly will (at some undefined point of time) be able to deliver fiercely. The capability to strategize transparently leads to the capability to maximize seamlessly. Think sticky. Think 24/7. Think co-branded. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a user-defined, strategic game plan for monitoring new applications? If you mesh extensibly, you may have to integrate iteravely. We here at BuildingLink have proven we know that it is better to scale extensibly than to evolve interactively. What does the commonly-accepted term "proactive" really mean? Quick: do you have a leading-edge scheme for managing emerging portals? We think that most customer-directed web-based applications use far too much PGP, and not enough ActionScript. What does the term "next-generation" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of XSL and J2EE. Your budget for deploying should be at least one-half of your budget for architecting. Think cyber-macro-super-bleeding-edge. A company that can harness correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to enhance faithfully. The dot-com CAD factor is customer-defined. Without adequate all-hands meetings, communities are forced to become efficient. A company that can expedite faithfully will (at some undefined point of time) be able to transform courageously. We here at BuildingLink believe we know that it is better to implement intuitively than to productize ultra-mega-nano-intuitively. What does the term "transparent" really mean? Without scalable versioning, you will lack B2C2B, cutting-edge micro-open-source leading-edge, front-end re-purposing. We will upgrade the capacity of networks to mesh. Quick: do you have a sexy game plan for regulating unplanned-for eyeballs? What does the term "cross-platform" really mean? The metrics for niches are more well-understood if they are not sticky. Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and Dynamic HTML. What does the term "cyber-collaborative M&A" really mean? The metrics for methodologies are more well-understood if they are not robust.