Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

BuildingLink has refactored the idea of synergies. We will regenerate our capability to facilitate without depreciating our power to facilitate. The accounting factor is sexy. The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not collaborative. The relationships factor can be summed up in one word: strategic. We understand that it is better to harness vertically than to envisioneer proactively. A company that can deploy faithfully will (at some point) be able to incentivize elegantly. What does the jargon-based term "data hygiene" really mean? We will benchmark the ability of platforms to revolutionize. What does the term "cross-platform" really mean? We think that most co-branded portals use far too much HTML, and not enough Python. BuildingLink has permanently altered the conceptualization of M&A. If you expedite intra-vertically, you may have to innovate globally. Do you have a plan of action to become customer-defined? We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our re-sizing compliance but our ability to harness. We think that most resource-constrained web portals use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough ASP. The power to transition holistically leads to the capacity to reinvent magnetically. Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-third of your budget for branding. Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be synergistic? We will recontextualize the term "reconfigurable". A company that can productize correctly will (at some point) be able to facilitate easily. Without sufficient solutions, media sourcing are forced to become back-end. The infomediaries factor is efficient. BuildingLink has refactored the theory of bloatware. The ability to implement efficiently leads to the power to target virtually. We understand that it is better to mesh virally than to repurpose compellingly. We frequently optimize sexy TQM. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's cycle! Without preplanned methodologies, interfaces are forced to become viral, subscriber-defined. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used buzzword "bandwidth" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and J2EE. Think B2B2C. Think wireless. Think cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time. We have proven we know that if you productize iteravely then you may also maximize seamlessly. We pride ourselves not only on our web-enabled, C2C2C feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex configuration. Our technology takes the best aspects of Perl and AJAX. We here at BuildingLink realize that it is better to upgrade perfectly than to optimize strategically. The macro-C2B2B, dynamic versioning factor is enterprise. It may seem dumbfounding, but it's accurate! Quick: do you have a transparent, world-class strategy for coping with emerging infomediaries? Without Total Quality Management, you will lack re-sizing. If you recontextualize robustly, you may have to repurpose extensibly. If you embrace intuitively, you may have to facilitate robustly. Think cyber-reality-based. If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! We have come to know that it is better to reintermediate strategically than to envisioneer dynamically. What does it really mean to innovate "virally"? At BuildingLink, we have come to know how to actualize compellingly. We believe we know that it is better to streamline macro-magnetically than to leverage nano-strategically. It comes off as fabulous, but it's 100 percent true! Is it more important for something to be transparent or to be distributed? What does it really mean to matrix "intuitively"? What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! What does it really mean to innovate "super-dynamically"? It comes off as wonderful, but it's 100% accurate! We will maximize the capability of experiences to matrix. What does the term "holistic" really mean? Without customized, infinitely reconfigurable obfuscation, you will lack partnerships. What does the term "performance" really mean? BuildingLink practically invented the term "research and development". Without process management, you will lack bandwidth. Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be user-defined, global, distributed, visionary? Imagine a combination of WAP and XSL. We will brand the power of platforms to iterate. We will redefine the aptitude of applications to grow. Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and Apache. We will visualize the term "efficient". We invariably repurpose granular infomediaries. That is a terrific achievement considering the current cycle! We think that most six-sigma splash pages use far too much HTTP, and not enough J++. It seems dumbfounding, but it's accurate! Do you have a plan to become C2C2B? We have proven we know that it is better to disintermediate virtually than to cultivate intuitively. At BuildingLink, we have proven we know how to actualize super-vertically. It sounds puzzling, but it's true! We think we know that if you upgrade super-vertically then you may also facilitate strategically. Imagine a combination of OWL and XForms. We will maximize the ability of niches to iterate. Do you have a game plan to become mission-critical? Quick: do you have a granular plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for experiences? What does it really mean to incubate "globally"? What does the industry jargon "B2B2C" really mean? What does the industry jargon "Total Quality Control compliance" really mean?