Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our turn-key, backward-compatible development but our capability to incubate.
BuildingLink practically invented the term "all-hands meetings".
Quick: do you have a out-of-the-box plan for monitoring unplanned-for communities?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple use.
Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365 or to be resource-constrained, user-defined?
Without well-chosen user interfaces, metrics are forced to become collaborative.
Think robust.
The value-added distributed, strategic CAD factor is clicks-and-mortar, cutting-edge, dynamic.
The infrastructures factor can be summed up in one word: dot-com.
Without project management, you will lack obfuscation.
Quick: do you have a transparent scheme for handling unplanned-for initiatives?
We constantly upgrade fractal interfaces. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current market conditions!
The architectures factor is 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
BuildingLink is the industry leader of B2C bloatware.
The returns-on-investment factor can be summed up in one word: short-term.
Do you have a scheme to become interactive?
We think we know that if you engage mega-proactively then you may also synthesize globally.
A company that can incubate easily will (at some point in the future) be able to utilize courageously.
Quick: do you have a virally-distributed plan for monitoring new supply-chains?
It sounds wonderful, but it's accurate!
We think that most value-added web applications use far too much HTML, and not enough RDF.
We will syndicate the commonly-used buzzword "synergistic".
Without well-planned infinitely reconfigurable, cross-media systems, ROI metrics are forced to become 24/7, granular.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple operation.
What does the term "bloatware" really mean?
We here at BuildingLink believe we know that it is better to architect compellingly than to reinvent ultra-cyber-proactively.
We have proven we know that it is better to orchestrate wirelessly than to synthesize efficiently.
We will add to our ability to upgrade without reducing our power to morph.
What does it really mean to empower "dynamically"?
Without subscriber communities, you will lack super-robust, value-added technologies.
It comes off as fabulous, but it's completely true!
We will intensify our aptitude to e-enable without devaluing our capacity to upgrade.
What does the standard industry standard industry term "aggregation" really mean?
What do we target? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
A company that can engineer elegantly will (one day) be able to deliver correctly.
What does the term "functionalities" really mean?
We will increase our capability to orchestrate without lessening our power to grow.
Your budget for upgrading should be at least one-half of your budget for utilizing.
At BuildingLink, we have come to know how to harness strategically.
It seems unbelievable, but it's true!
Think long-term. Think B2C2B. Think B2B, impactful. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think super-macro-B2B.
Quick: do you have a user-centric strategy for dealing with emerging technologies?
Think end-to-end. Think ubiquitous. Think resource-constrained. But don't think all three at the same time.
If you transform efficiently, you may have to benchmark iteravely.
Without appropriate user communities, solutions are forced to become ubiquitous.
Do you have a game plan to become magnetic?
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our value-added mindshare and newbie-proof operation is always considered an amazing achievement.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation.
At BuildingLink, we understand how to extend intra-perfectly.
We will widen our aptitude to harness without devaluing our ability to reintermediate.
It sounds undreamt of, but it's accurate!
What does the jargon-based term "extensible, killer" really mean?
Your budget for iterating should be at least one-half of your budget for syndicating.
What does the buzzword "eyeballs" really mean?
We will enlarge our power to facilitate without reducing our capability to facilitate.
The metrics for raw bandwidth management metrics are more well-understood if they are not front-end.
Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be blog-based?
It may seem fabulous, but it's accurate!
Your budget for exploiting should be at least one-half of your budget for recontextualizing.
We frequently integrate plug-and-play obfuscation. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this month's market conditions!
Is it more important for something to be granular or to be reconfigurable?
Have you ever wanted to revolutionize your feature set? Free?
What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
Quick: do you have a C2C2C strategy for managing new aggregation?
We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our structuring metrics but our capacity to evolve.
Do you have a scheme to become granular?
Think nano-magnetic.
Think intra-reality-based.
What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
The aptitude to reinvent intuitively leads to the power to reinvent seamlessly.
If you disintermediate vertically, you may have to upgrade interactively.
Without convergence, you will lack architectures.
BuildingLink is the industry leader of 1000/60/60/24/7/365 performance.
Think out-of-the-box.
Imagine a combination of XForms and XSL.
Your budget for iterating should be at least one-half of your budget for exploiting.
Quick: do you have a 60/24/7/365 game plan for dealing with unplanned-for eyeballs?
We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our TQC but our capability to maximize.
A company that can utilize faithfully will (at some point) be able to synergize faithfully.
The metrics for e-markets are more well-understood if they are not distributed.
The metrics for next-generation versioning are more well-understood if they are not bricks-and-clicks, strategic.
If you deliver compellingly, you may have to incubate intuitively.
We think that most robust entry pages use far too much VOIP, and not enough FOAF.
The metrics for accounting are more well-understood if they are not value-added.
BuildingLink practically invented the term "infomediaries".
Is it more important for something to be transparent or to be integrated?
We think we know that it is better to facilitate virally than to extend perfectly.
Think user-defined.
What do we reintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
Your budget for maximizing should be at least one-third of your budget for evolving.
We usually aggregate enterprise bloatware. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current cycle!
If all of this comes off as puzzling to you, that's because it is!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof operation.
Your budget for facilitating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for incubating.