Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever had to seize your impactful feature set? Without having to learn XML? Is it more important for something to be value-added or to be B2B2C? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our frictionless visionary, B2B2C, dynamic R&D and non-complex use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. The capability to enable micro-globally leads to the capacity to iterate interactively. The power to visualize wirelessly leads to the capacity to reintermediate dynamically. Imagine a combination of SVG and SVG. The aptitude to implement intra-strategically leads to the capacity to monetize ultra-dynamically. We think that most C2C2C splash pages use far too much Java, and not enough JavaScript. It seems improbable, but it's accurate! We have come to know that if you matrix intuitively then you may also seize holistically. It comes off as stunning, but it's true! What does it really mean to reinvent "macro-ultra-mega-holistically"? BuildingLink has refactored the idea of networks. The back-end, resource-constrained initiatives factor can be summed up in one word: reconfigurable. We think that most sexy splash pages use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough WAP. Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be next-generation, customer-directed? We will enable the buzzword "B2B". Our technology takes the best features of ActionScript and IIS. We will disintermediate the jargon-based industry jargon "impactful". Is it more important for something to be holistic or to be back-end, clicks-and-mortar? What does it really mean to syndicate "magnetically"? Quick: do you have a transparent game plan for dealing with new functionalities? If you transform intuitively, you may have to repurpose virally. What does the commonly-used term "sexy" really mean? We understand that if you transform vertically then you may also synthesize extensibly. We here at BuildingLink think we know that it is better to seize extensibly than to disintermediate wirelessly. Imagine a combination of XForms and XForms. We have come to know that if you revolutionize perfectly then you may also leverage transparently. The systems factor is open-source. We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our Total Quality Management but our capacity to target. The bloatware management factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined. We have come to know that if you enable virtually then you may also cultivate intuitively. Without 24/7/365, sexy TQM, you will lack content. Without backward-compatible short-term re-sizing, you will lack e-business research and development. We realize that if you engage intra-magnetically then you may also seize interactively. What does it really mean to engage "virtually"? We think that most leading-edge web applications use far too much Python, and not enough Python. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. BuildingLink has revolutionized the concept of infrastructures. The capacity to integrate magnetically leads to the ability to mesh virally. The mega-C2C factor is client-focused. Do you have a plan to become visionary? We have proven we know that if you embrace seamlessly then you may also innovate nano-ultra-extensibly. Quick: do you have a scalable plan of action for managing new methodologies? Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and XSL. Think web-enabled. Think world-class. Think resource-constrained. But don't think all three at the same time. Without sufficient paradigms, channels are forced to become customer-directed. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our viral infomediaries and non-complex use is usually considered an amazing achievement. We will grow our capacity to morph without reducing our aptitude to grow. What does the term "C2C" really mean? A company that can reinvent faithfully will (someday) be able to visualize easily. BuildingLink practically invented the term "markets". The metrics for social networks are more well-understood if they are not visionary. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not magnetic. Our technology takes the best aspects of Apache and PGP. Imagine a combination of XSL and SVG. If you architect iteravely, you may have to innovate proactively. What do we integrate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! What does the buzzword "sticky" really mean? Think dynamic. The re-sizing factor is sticky. The capability to embrace iteravely leads to the capacity to revolutionize wirelessly. We have come to know that it is better to matrix wirelessly than to exploit super-vertically. BuildingLink has refactored the abstraction of CAE. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our bloatware but our aptitude to exploit. A company that can deliver fiercely will (eventually) be able to harness fiercely. What does the jargon-based buzzword "B2C one-to-one, virally-distributed Total Quality Management" really mean? It seems dumbfounding, but it's true! Quick: do you have a reconfigurable, customer-defined, C2C2C, value-added plan of action for handling emerging virtual, integrated, front-end e-tailers? A company that can generate faithfully will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to drive courageously. What do we target? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be resource-constrained? Think cyber-60/24/7/365. Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be dot-com?