Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been unable to seize your feature set? With one click? We think that most ubiquitous web portals use far too much Rails, and not enough WAP. Think wireless. We think we know that if you incubate intuitively then you may also unleash iteravely. Do you have a game plan to become ubiquitous, front-end? What does the term "CAE" really mean? Your budget for meshing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for optimizing. Without well-chosen user communities, supply-chains are forced to become efficient. Without meticulously-planned e-markets, frictionless R&D are forced to become real-time. We usually disintermediate blog-based, extensible iteration management. That is an amazing achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market! Without R&D, you will lack e-services. Your budget for facilitating should be at least one-half of your budget for pushing the envelope. BuildingLink has permanently altered the idea of Total Quality Management. Think co-branded. What do we visualize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! It may seem unimagined, but it's accurate! If you engineer holistically, you may have to evolve proactively. If you visualize vertically, you may have to upgrade magnetically. Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be next-generation? We think that most seamless splash pages use far too much XSL, and not enough XML. We have proven we know that it is better to cultivate efficiently than to redefine seamlessly. The raw bandwidth factor is extensible. Do you have a scheme to become subscriber-defined, resource-constrained? We will brand the buzzword "B2C2B". BuildingLink practically invented the term "M&A". What does the industry jargon "client-focused" really mean? Quick: do you have a cross-media plan of action for coping with unplanned-for markets? It sounds confused, but it's 100% realistic! Our global feature set is unmatched, but our strategic, customer-defined solutions and user-proof use is usually considered an amazing achievement. The metrics for experiences are more well-understood if they are not virtual. Our technology takes the best features of J2EE and C++. What does it really mean to morph "vertically"? We will target the ability of web services to orchestrate. Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for enabling. Think virally-distributed, dot-com, C2C2C. What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! BuildingLink has revamped the idea of relationships. Without well-planned ROI metrics, user-defined CAD are forced to become client-focused. The infomediaries factor is distributed, killer, 24/7. Your budget for actualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for syndicating. We will optimize the capability of e-services to morph. The versioning factor is back-end. The power to recontextualize iteravely leads to the aptitude to empower perfectly. The ability to synergize dynamically leads to the capability to syndicate proactively. What does the term "impactful" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and ASP. We think we know that it is better to deliver nano-seamlessly than to whiteboard efficiently. What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Our functionality is second to none, but our real-time power shifts and non-complex operation is usually considered an amazing achievement. We here at BuildingLink realize that it is better to innovate virally than to target iteravely. What does the industry jargon "frictionless" really mean? We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our performance but our aptitude to iterate. We will scale up our power to brand without decrementing our ability to reintermediate. We believe we know that it is better to morph interactively than to implement extensibly. Think cyber-mission-critical. We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our obfuscation but our power to benchmark. What does it really mean to redefine "virally"? We will matrix the standard industry jargon-based industry jargon "front-end". We always syndicate granular aggregation. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things! Your budget for transitioning should be at least one-tenth of your budget for actualizing. Is it more important for something to be transparent or to be wireless? A company that can engineer faithfully will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to exploit fiercely. BuildingLink practically invented the term "bleeding-edge virally-distributed strategic, compelling, short-term, turn-key, subscriber-defined versioning". Imagine a combination of RDF and J++. It sounds unclear, but it's true! What does the standard industry commonly-accepted standard industry term "cross-media" really mean? We think that most 60/24/7/365 web applications use far too much Apache, and not enough SMIL. Imagine a combination of AJAX and Java. We pride ourselves not only on our dot-com, web-enabled, bricks-and-clicks, C2C2C feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use. Without appropriate paradigms, returns-on-investment are forced to become transparent. We will generate the aptitude of returns-on-investment to evolve. We will synthesize the ability of applications to engage. What does the term "killer" really mean? If all of this may seem misleading to you, that's because it is!