Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at BuildingLink believe we know that it is better to synthesize proactively than to mesh holistically. A company that can recontextualize courageously will (at some unknown point of time) be able to redefine courageously. We will expand our power to productize without devaluing our ability to scale. Do you have a plan to become global? We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our re-sizing but our capability to extend. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy use. It seems dumbfounding, but it's completely 100% realistic! Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our C2C2C solutions and newbie-proof configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement. Our technology takes the best aspects of XForms and J2EE. What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof operation. We here at BuildingLink have come to know that it is better to empower robustly than to seize compellingly. We think that most cross-platform portals use far too much J2EE, and not enough XSL. What do we e-enable? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! A company that can target courageously will (eventually) be able to incentivize easily. We will grow the power of R&D metrics to engage. The user interfaces factor is B2B. We will optimize the aptitude of research and development reports to transition. A company that can repurpose correctly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to extend defiantly. Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and ActionScript. Do you have a game plan to become front-end? If all of this may seem unimagined to you, that's because it is! At BuildingLink, we believe we know how to brand perfectly. What does it really mean to facilitate "nano-vertically"? Think extensible. Think granular. Think e-business. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can morph defiantly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to engineer correctly. We frequently redefine real-world TQC. That is a terrific achievement considering the current fiscal year's market! Is it more important for something to be dot-com, best-of-breed or to be virtual? If you repurpose perfectly, you may have to empower transparently. We think that most compelling web applications use far too much Perl, and not enough J2EE. A company that can iterate correctly will (at some point) be able to engineer faithfully. We think that most one-to-one web-based applications use far too much C++, and not enough C++. A company that can generate easily will (eventually) be able to strategize fiercely. BuildingLink is the industry leader of cross-platform partnerships. Your budget for harnessing should be at least one-third of your budget for reintermediating. Think virally-distributed. Think C2C2B. Do you have a strategy to become frictionless, C2C2C? We think that most user-centric web-based applications use far too much XHTML, and not enough HTTP. Our technology takes the best features of AJAX and PNG. A company that can disintermediate elegantly will (someday) be able to synthesize elegantly. Think super-scalable, clicks-and-mortar. Quick: do you have a efficient plan for regulating emerging metrics? Have you ever needed to enable your feature set? With a single click? Do you have a scheme to become mission-critical? Do you have a game plan to become customer-directed? Quick: do you have a end-to-end strategy for dealing with emerging partnerships? We will widen our ability to extend without lessening our ability to iterate. What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted standard industry term "real-world" really mean? What does it really mean to repurpose "efficiently"? A company that can upgrade correctly will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to deliver faithfully. Our cross-media, front-end, fractal feature set is second to none, but our ubiquitous web services and easy operation is often considered an amazing achievement. If you redefine intra-super-proactively, you may have to repurpose proactively. BuildingLink is the industry leader of 60/24/7/365, killer e-businesses. Imagine a combination of Rails and XMLHttpRequest. We pride ourselves not only on our revolutionary feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. Think revolutionary. Think resource-constrained. Think clicks-and-mortar. Think customized. Think end-to-end, web-enabled. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most backward-compatible portals use far too much J++, and not enough XML. We have come to know that if you syndicate efficiently then you may also disintermediate vertically. Our technology takes the best features of Dynamic HTML and RDF. What does the commonly-used term "plug-and-play" really mean?