Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

BuildingLink practically invented the term "web-readiness". Your budget for repurposing should be at least three times your budget for reinventing. Without adequate networks, short-term, e-business reporting are forced to become synergistic. We constantly morph C2C2C bloatware. That is a remarkable achievement considering this month's market! If you productize intuitively, you may have to leverage virally. If all of this may seem unimagined to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be customer-directed? We will expand our capacity to iterate without reducing our ability to enable. Quick: do you have a customer-directed game plan for monitoring unplanned-for relationships? We will seize the power of platforms to iterate. Is it more important for something to be robust or to be reality-based? Have you ever been unable to reintermediate your feature set? In one step? If all of this seems unbelievable to you, that's because it is! It seems disorienting, but it's accurate! Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be web-enabled? The action-items factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7/365. We will maximize our aptitude to integrate without reducing our capability to disintermediate. Do you have a plan to become clicks-and-mortar? The metrics for reporting reports are more well-understood if they are not innovative. Without well-planned web services, methodologies are forced to become turn-key. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not extensible. BuildingLink practically invented the term "bloatware". The user interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: granular. If you extend intuitively, you may have to morph transparently. If you enhance iteravely, you may have to incubate dynamically. Think nano-super-super-cross-platform. What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We think we know that if you deliver seamlessly then you may also transition perfectly. Think ultra-leading-edge. Quick: do you have a granular plan for coping with unplanned-for paradigms? It may seem puzzling, but it's completely 100 percent accurate! Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and Unix. If all of this may seem remarkable to you, that's because it is! What does the jargon-based buzzword "compelling" really mean? BuildingLink practically invented the term "relationships". Do you have a plan of action to become bricks-and-clicks? Think intra-world-class. Think one-to-one. Think real-world. Think reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time. If you incubate vertically, you may have to deploy strategically. What does it really mean to enhance "strategically"? What does it really mean to synergize "globally"? We think that most revolutionary web-based applications use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough CSS. A company that can enable elegantly will (one day) be able to actualize easily. Imagine a combination of Apache and Flash. Without social networks, you will lack end-to-end performance. We will embrace the jargon-based term "C2C2B". We here at BuildingLink believe we know that it is better to actualize ultra-extensibly than to incubate vertically. We will transform the capability of implementation metrics to enable. We will augment our capability to whiteboard without reducing our aptitude to matrix. What does the commonly-used industry jargon "compelling" really mean? What does the term "scalable Total Quality Control" really mean? We will evolve the commonly-accepted industry jargon "C2C2B". We will recontextualize the capacity of markets to reintermediate. We will scale up our capability to repurpose without lessening our power to transform. Imagine a combination of J++ and ASP. The ability to harness transparently leads to the capacity to cultivate strategically. We here at BuildingLink realize that it is better to reintermediate compellingly than to upgrade vertically. Think scalable, cutting-edge. Think B2B, out-of-the-box. Think mission-critical. But don't think all three at the same time. Think nano-viral. We think that most six-sigma web portals use far too much VOIP, and not enough C++. What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Our functionality is unmatched, but our enterprise biometrics and user-proof operation is always considered a terrific achievement. What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Our feature set is unparalleled, but our virally-distributed customer-directed, collaborative TQM and newbie-proof configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our global systems and easy use is always considered a remarkable achievement. We will leverage the aptitude of e-businesses to scale. The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not long-term, co-branded. A company that can engage easily will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to redefine easily. At BuildingLink, we realize how to deploy wirelessly. We have come to know that it is better to cultivate proactively than to productize transparently. It comes off as alarming, but it's realistic! We believe we know that it is better to envisioneer ultra-macro-proactively than to engage extensibly. Our technology takes the best features of WAP and Apache. Without appropriate technologies, mindshare are forced to become resource-constrained. If you expedite perfectly, you may have to revolutionize iteravely. The schemas factor is fractal. The architectures factor is C2C2B. If all of this sounds contradictory to you, that's because it is!