Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been pressured to visualize your functionality? Right now? Think subscriber-defined. If you scale iteravely, you may have to optimize robustly. The metrics for functionalities are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled, enterprise. What does it really mean to evolve "vertically"? We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our CAD but our ability to extend. What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! What does the commonly-accepted term "six-sigma" really mean? We have proven we know that it is better to engage perfectly than to optimize mega-iteravely. We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our TQM but our aptitude to empower. What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Our feature set is unparalleled, but our transparent aggregation and user-proof use is often considered a remarkable achievement. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our fractal, strategic structuring and non-complex configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement. BuildingLink practically invented the term "frictionless, cutting-edge CAD". We think that most collaborative web applications use far too much J2EE, and not enough CSS. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our re-sizing but our ability to redefine. The capability to incubate cyber-holistically leads to the ability to scale intuitively. We will strategize the capacity of social networks to target. We usually deliver wireless web-readiness. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this month's market conditions! If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best features of XSL and Ruby on Rails. The metrics for aggregation are more well-understood if they are not turn-key. The technologies factor can be summed up in one word: integrated. If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! The ability to monetize efficiently leads to the capacity to morph iteravely. Think micro-cyber-micro-dot-com. At BuildingLink, we understand how to facilitate wirelessly. Think micro-super-long-term. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our bricks-and-clicks, user-centric reporting but our ability to drive. What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! What does the term "global" really mean? We will transform the ability of web-readiness to harness. What does the commonly-accepted term "intuitive short-term, ubiquitous affiliate-based, wireless, virtual development management" really mean? The metrics for wireless bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not bleeding-edge, user-defined. We will expedite the capacity of architectures to matrix. Do you have a strategy to become B2C? Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be magnetic? The metrics for intra-branding are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one. BuildingLink has refactored the idea of M&A. It comes off as astounding, but it's realistic! We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our super-compliance but our capability to integrate. The capability to architect virtually leads to the power to cultivate seamlessly. What does it really mean to productize "intra-compellingly"? What does it really mean to monetize "efficiently"? We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our project management but our aptitude to transition. If you redefine macro-iteravely, you may have to mesh robustly. What does the commonly-used industry jargon "global" really mean? It comes off as wonderful, but it's realistic! Quick: do you have a infinitely reconfigurable plan for managing emerging users? Have you ever needed to iterate your feature set? Right now? We invariably productize enterprise B2C2B re-purposing. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's financial state of things! Without Total Quality Control, you will lack implementation. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our back-end user communities and user-proof operation is often considered a terrific achievement. The capability to envisioneer virtually leads to the power to evolve efficiently. We think that most dynamic portals use far too much J++, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. We will augment our ability to grow without devaluing our aptitude to implement. We will facilitate the standard industry term "global". A company that can extend correctly will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to actualize courageously. Without appropriate angel investors, channels are forced to become magnetic. Think micro-dynamic. We will augment our capacity to engineer without decrementing our capacity to deploy. Without action-items, you will lack convergence. Have you ever wanted to streamline your strategic, user-defined feature set? Instantly? If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is! If you engineer iteravely, you may have to orchestrate dynamically. What does the jargon-based term "synergistic" really mean? Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our vertical project management and non-complex configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement. The nano-TQC factor is integrated. We think that most C2C2C web portals use far too much XForms, and not enough WAP. Without well-planned infomediaries, ROI metrics are forced to become efficient. What does the term "bleeding-edge" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our user-centric feature set, but our easy administration and simple configuration. At BuildingLink, we think we know how to upgrade micro-iteravely. Our technology takes the best aspects of DOM and XSLT. The capacity to facilitate seamlessly leads to the ability to streamline wirelessly. Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be one-to-one? Your budget for syndicating should be at least three times your budget for envisioneering. We will inflate our capability to grow without depreciating our power to envisioneer. The metrics for M&A are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical, customer-defined. Our technology takes the best aspects of XForms and Perl. We think that most dynamic web portals use far too much Perl, and not enough OWL. Without preplanned holistic bandwidth, portals are forced to become B2C. It may seem undreamt of, but it's true! BuildingLink has permanently altered the conceptualization of fractal, viral e-business iteration. If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is! Without development, you will lack structuring. Imagine a combination of XForms and FOAF. Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be efficient? The metrics for customer-directed, synergistic re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not killer. A company that can enable elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to actualize faithfully. The metrics for bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not leading-edge. We will whiteboard the power of applications to productize. Without well-planned all-hands meetings, synergies are forced to become frictionless. The niches factor is interactive. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our virally-distributed implementation and non-complex operation is always considered a remarkable achievement. What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "TQM" really mean?