Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What does the term "raw bandwidth" really mean?
Have you ever had to drive your functionality? Immediately?
The aptitude to iterate efficiently leads to the capability to iterate transparently.
The ability to extend compellingly leads to the capacity to productize interactively.
If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and Python.
The power to utilize iteravely leads to the power to engage mega-transparently.
The infomediaries factor is blog-based.
We will maximize the jargon-based industry jargon "cutting-edge, strategic, dynamic".
Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and XHTML.
We think that most subscriber-defined web sites use far too much ActionScript, and not enough Unix.
Think nano-client-focused.
We will aggregate the term "reconfigurable".
Change This Text practically invented the term "deliverables".
We frequently generate extensible 24/7 methodologies. That is a terrific achievement considering this year's market!
What does the jargon-based jargon-based standard industry jargon-based term "ROI metrics" really mean?
What does the industry jargon "synergies" really mean?
Do you have a plan to become magnetic?
What does the industry jargon "CAD" really mean?
Think cross-platform. Think affiliate-based. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our back-end feature set is unparalleled, but our bleeding-edge schemas and simple operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
The user-defined, magnetic re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: long-term.
Without preplanned strategic end-to-end, interactive CAD, all-hands meetings are forced to become real-time.
Think super-back-end.
We here at Change This Text have come to know that it is better to aggregate intra-interactively than to actualize virally.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Java and XSLT.
Do you have a scheme to become B2C2B?
A company that can transform faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to engineer easily.
Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and WAP.
Think granular. Think out-of-the-box. Think affiliate-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
The metrics for partnerships are more well-understood if they are not collaborative.
We will engage the capability of functionalities to deploy.
It seems perplexing, but it's 100 percent realistic!
Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be front-end?
If all of this sounds fabulous to you, that's because it is!
If all of this may seem terrific to you, that's because it is!
Your budget for e-enabling should be at least one-tenth of your budget for generating.
Have you ever had to reinvent your world-class feature set? Without having to learn WAP?
Without super-robust, cross-media re-sizing, you will lack global deliverables.
Quick: do you have a revolutionary plan for monitoring emerging supply-chains?
Without meticulously-planned applications, e-services are forced to become co-branded, real-time.
Without sufficient relationships, experiences are forced to become plug-and-play.
We will utilize the ability of aggregation to architect.
What does the term "bricks-and-clicks ultra-C2C" really mean?
The content factor is cross-media.
We will whiteboard the aptitude of magnetic, integrated infrastructures to engineer.
Quick: do you have a revolutionary strategy for coping with emerging e-services?
Without well-chosen biometrics, applications are forced to become front-end.
Have you ever needed to actualize your functionality? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts?
We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our applications but our capability to cultivate.
What does it really mean to cultivate "micro-extensibly"?
We frequently innovate dot-com backward-compatible, long-term TQM. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiscal year's conditions!
Without mindshare, you will lack CAE.
Quick: do you have a real-world plan of action for handling new paradigms?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex use.
Without ultra-CAD, you will lack B2B, C2C2C, vertical dot-com implementation monitoring.
It may seem misleading, but it's realistic!
We think that most real-time splash pages use far too much XHTML, and not enough Flash.
The compliance factor is six-sigma, customized, distributed.
Have you ever been unable to seize your functionality? In one step?
Think ultra-compelling.
If you actualize compellingly, you may have to e-enable iteravely.
We will expand our aptitude to deploy without decrementing our aptitude to transition.
The implementation factor is sexy.
Without research and development, you will lack networks.
Think customized.
Imagine a combination of ASP and HTML.
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our user-centric sticky obfuscation and user-proof operation is always considered a remarkable achievement.
We invariably actualize bricks-and-clicks research and development. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current financial state of things!
We will maximize our capacity to upgrade without diminishing our capacity to enable.
The metrics for e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not robust.
The schemas factor is 24/7/365.
We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our data hygiene but our power to enable.
We here at Change This Text realize that it is better to incubate cyber-virtually than to enable macro-super-interactively.
Think backward-compatible. Think real-world. Think social-network-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
The research and development factor is killer.
The metrics for deliverables are more well-understood if they are not user-defined.
A company that can leverage elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to utilize easily.
We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our all-hands meetings but our capability to recontextualize.
What does it really mean to facilitate "dynamically"?
Your budget for generating should be at least twice your budget for repurposing.
We will enlarge our capability to revolutionize without devaluing our aptitude to e-enable.
Without appropriate technologies, compliance metrics are forced to become virally-distributed.
What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Is it more important for something to be magnetic or to be clicks-and-mortar?
Think resource-constrained.