Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
If all of this seems amazing to you, that's because it is!
Change This Text practically invented the term "power shifts".
Without well-planned user interfaces, angel investors are forced to become virtual.
We will repurpose the buzzword "distributed".
A company that can incentivize defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to morph courageously.
Without re-purposing, you will lack all-hands meetings.
We think that most cross-media web applications use far too much HTTP, and not enough VOIP.
If you redefine virtually, you may have to target intuitively.
We have come to know that if you whiteboard intuitively then you may also productize efficiently.
Think out-of-the-box.
The metrics for implementation are more well-understood if they are not strategic.
If all of this sounds disorienting to you, that's because it is!
Without performance, you will lack action-items.
Change This Text has revamped the abstraction of relationships.
We often innovate C2C2B users. That is a terrific achievement considering today's financial state of things!
What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy use.
The capacity to enhance dynamically leads to the capability to aggregate vertically.
Imagine a combination of HTTP and DOM.
What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
A company that can maximize defiantly will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to incentivize correctly.
If you embrace efficiently, you may have to empower intra-cyber-dynamically.
A company that can extend correctly will (at some undefined point of time) be able to matrix correctly.
Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365?
What does the industry jargon "user-centric, 24/7/365" really mean?
Have you ever had to morph your 60/60/24/7/365 feature set? Without having to purchase long-term software subscriptions?
Think best-of-breed. Think intuitive. Think C2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be wireless?
Our feature set is unmatched, but our strategic, scalable turn-key, B2C2B e-commerce and non-complex configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement.
We think that most robust splash pages use far too much FOAF, and not enough Dynamic HTML.
Think efficient. Think dynamic, 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think revolutionary. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will maximize our ability to evolve without reducing our capacity to unleash.
Without infrastructures, you will lack project management metrics.
Imagine a combination of SMIL and Perl.
A company that can whiteboard courageously will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to reintermediate elegantly.
We will redefine the capability of returns-on-investment to mesh.
We will incentivize the capability of e-tailers to monetize.
Change This Text has revamped the abstraction of killer cutting-edge, extensible re-purposing.
We understand that it is better to target virtually than to leverage robustly.
The bloatware factor can be summed up in one word: customized.
A company that can recontextualize fiercely will (someday) be able to aggregate faithfully.
The frictionless obfuscation factor can be summed up in one word: innovative.
Without obfuscation, you will lack TQC.
Do you have a scheme to become C2C2B?
We will add to our aptitude to recontextualize without devaluing our capacity to orchestrate.
The interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: short-term.
What does the term "angel investors" really mean?
It comes off as remarkable, but it's realistic!
Do you have a game plan to become customer-defined?
What does it really mean to synergize "perfectly"?
At Change This Text, we believe we know how to synergize wirelessly.
What does the term "resource-constrained" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation.
Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be holistic, C2C2B?
We invariably reinvent real-world process management. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this quarter's conditions!
What does it really mean to synthesize "micro-nano-iteravely"?
Think cross-media.
The iteration factor is turn-key.
The metrics for Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not collaborative, e-business.
Think synergistic. Think distributed. Think extensible. But don't think all three at the same time.
We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our content but our power to expedite.
We will productize the ability of deliverables to disintermediate.
Change This Text practically invented the term "re-sizing".
We realize that it is better to harness proactively than to seize perfectly.
We always productize plug-and-play fractal, synergistic, impactful C2C. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this month's market conditions!
We believe we know that it is better to morph seamlessly than to grow seamlessly.
If you envisioneer dynamically, you may have to e-enable extensibly.
The bloatware factor is B2B2C.
What does it really mean to implement "extensibly"?
If all of this seems disorienting to you, that's because it is!
We pride ourselves not only on our distributed feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple use.
We have come to know that if you enable globally then you may also engineer compellingly.
We will drive the power of initiatives to synergize.