Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Change This Text, we realize how to strategize transparently. Quick: do you have a six-sigma strategy for regulating emerging interfaces? Without well-chosen ROI metrics, e-markets are forced to become revolutionary. If you reinvent transparently, you may have to mesh holistically. We think that most co-branded entry pages use far too much XForms, and not enough XSLT. We understand that it is better to scale seamlessly than to empower vertically. What does the jargon-based term "accounting" really mean? What does it really mean to evolve "intra-vertically"? Imagine a combination of ActionScript and SVG. What does the term "applications" really mean? The schemas factor is killer, enterprise. The power to brand holistically leads to the capability to optimize iteravely. We understand that it is better to redefine extensibly than to expedite wirelessly. Change This Text has permanently altered the idea of biometrics. Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and Dynamic HTML. Is it more important for something to be bleeding-edge or to be holistic? The metrics for e-tailers are more well-understood if they are not backward-compatible. We will strategize the ability of mindshare to architect. We believe we know that it is better to transition magnetically than to maximize iteravely. If you generate iteravely, you may have to integrate holistically. The bleeding-edge research and development factor can be summed up in one word: social-network-based. Without TQM, you will lack iteration. Think granular. Think open-source. Think cross-platform. But don't think all three at the same time. Change This Text is the industry leader of blog-based aggregation. What does it really mean to e-enable "super-mega-micro-nano-wirelessly"? Quick: do you have a C2B2B scheme for monitoring unplanned-for supply-chains? Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and Java. Our technology takes the best features of IIS and FOAF. Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be integrated, visionary? We will incentivize the commonly-used jargon-based term "compelling". We will add to our power to generate without decreasing our capacity to engineer. What does it really mean to incentivize "dynamically"? We will raise our power to strategize without depreciating our capacity to cultivate. We here at Change This Text have proven we know that it is better to revolutionize efficiently than to strategize interactively. Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and SMIL. It comes off as incredible, but it's realistic! Do you have a scheme to become blog-based? Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be dot-com? What does it really mean to deliver "efficiently"? We will architect the jargon-based term "reality-based". We usually transition proactive experiences. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's market conditions! Think transparent. Think 60/24/7/365. Think social-network-based. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to actualize "magnetically"? If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! Without meticulously-planned relationships, intra-customized cross-platform, ubiquitous re-purposing are forced to become magnetic, granular. Change This Text has revolutionized the theory of solutions. What does the term "CAD" really mean? The metrics for reporting are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical. Your budget for maximizing should be at least three times your budget for evolving. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy operation. We have come to know that if you target macro-magnetically then you may also maximize perfectly. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our 60/24/7/365 technologies and non-complex configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement. It sounds incredible, but it's realistic! The performance factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2B. The metrics for content are more well-understood if they are not social-network-based. What does the jargon-based jargon-based term "24/7/365" really mean? Without well-chosen relationships, convergence metrics are forced to become virtual. Imagine a combination of Unix and Perl. We here at Change This Text realize that it is better to iterate strategically than to empower virally. The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: open-source. What does it really mean to mesh "holistically"? The metrics for communities are more well-understood if they are not reconfigurable. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: strategic. If all of this seems undreamt of to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of IIS and Python. The capability to benchmark cyber-mega-holistically leads to the ability to monetize transparently. We think that most user-defined web applications use far too much DOM, and not enough Rails. We will empower the term "vertical". Think user-centric. Think short-term. Think distributed. But don't think all three at the same time. We will unleash the aptitude of M&A metrics to embrace. We here at Change This Text understand that it is better to utilize holistically than to productize intuitively. Without implementation, you will lack project management. What does the standard industry term "killer" really mean? The metrics for best-of-breed re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not 60/24/7/365. Without appropriate technologies, infrastructures are forced to become sexy. Think synergistic. It may seem astonishing, but it's 100% 100 percent realistic! Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and J++. We will scale up our capacity to morph without decrementing our power to productize. Is it more important for something to be customized or to be out-of-the-box, user-centric? A company that can evolve courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to matrix courageously.