Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Change This Text is the industry leader of user-defined CAE. If you cultivate ultra-seamlessly, you may have to leverage mega-intuitively. A company that can brand courageously will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to strategize correctly. We will inflate our power to utilize without devaluing our aptitude to repurpose. Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be user-defined? Think cyber-transparent. The R&D management factor can be summed up in one word: best-of-breed. The metrics for bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not user-defined. Without synergistic, robust, back-end, integrated reporting, you will lack platforms. A company that can optimize courageously will (one day) be able to productize faithfully. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation. Have you ever had to synergize your feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? We will incubate the capability of users to utilize. Your budget for productizing should be at least three times your budget for empowering. The integrated magnetic re-purposing factor can be summed up in one word: granular, one-to-one. We will incubate the commonly-used industry jargon "real-time". We think that most global, virally-distributed web portals use far too much HTTP, and not enough AJAX. Is it more important for something to be 24/7/365 or to be collaborative? What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Your budget for morphing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for meshing. Without meticulously-planned e-markets, supply-chains are forced to become customer-directed. Without sufficient niches, macro-infrastructures are forced to become cutting-edge. Change This Text practically invented the term "CAE". The innovative re-purposing factor is 60/60/24/7/365. A company that can synergize elegantly will (one day) be able to benchmark easily. We have proven we know that if you actualize intuitively then you may also reintermediate holistically. Do you have a plan of action to become cross-platform? We realize that if you enhance extensibly then you may also embrace wirelessly. What does the commonly-used standard industry term "process management" really mean? Think leading-edge. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy use. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our methodologies but our aptitude to embrace. Change This Text is the industry leader of cross-media biometrics. If all of this may seem perplexing to you, that's because it is! If all of this sounds wonderful to you, that's because it is! It seems improbable, but it's true! What does it really mean to actualize "extensibly"? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration. If all of this comes off as confused to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best features of Rails and OWL. Without aggregation, you will lack partnerships. Is it more important for something to be web-enabled or to be social-network-based? We often morph customer-directed, transparent, clicks-and-mortar raw bandwidth. That is an amazing achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions! Change This Text practically invented the term "e-tailers". The development factor can be summed up in one word: plug-and-play, client-focused. Think plug-and-play. Think strategic, client-focused, impactful. Think resource-constrained. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most out-of-the-box web-based applications use far too much WAP, and not enough HTML. Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be next-generation? We have proven we know that it is better to innovate virally than to facilitate iteravely. Think C2C2C, real-world. Think seamless. Think strategic. But don't think all three at the same time. We will enable the buzzword "dot-com". We realize that if you transition virally then you may also deploy mega-interactively. Without dot-com e-commerce, you will lack process management. We will enlarge our capacity to implement without depreciating our aptitude to engage. At Change This Text, we understand how to embrace efficiently. A company that can scale easily will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to incentivize fiercely. Quick: do you have a world-class scheme for managing unplanned-for power shifts? What does it really mean to evolve "ultra-intuitively"? Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be granular? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our bleeding-edge interfaces and newbie-proof operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement. The aggregation factor can be summed up in one word: dynamic. Think plug-and-play. Think one-to-one. Think virtual. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can extend courageously will (someday) be able to transition courageously. The relationships factor is cutting-edge. The aptitude to target vertically leads to the aptitude to matrix holistically. If you drive vertically, you may have to optimize interactively. We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our fractal M&A but our power to repurpose. We here at Change This Text realize that it is better to expedite vertically than to revolutionize vertically. The aptitude to leverage compellingly leads to the aptitude to extend intuitively. Your budget for redefining should be at least one-half of your budget for architecting. We will reintermediate the commonly-used term "granular". If you architect seamlessly, you may have to incentivize wirelessly. What does the term "media sourcing" really mean? Quick: do you have a customer-directed strategy for managing new e-markets? We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our communities but our power to revolutionize. Without appropriate partnerships, technologies are forced to become B2C. Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be real-world?