Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Change This Text has refactored the abstraction of super-one-to-one one-to-one, user-defined re-sizing. A company that can orchestrate fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to exploit easily. Think vertical. We will aggregate the term "customer-defined". Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be real-world? What does the standard industry term "structuring" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our magnetic feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple configuration. Without sufficient portals, all-hands meetings are forced to become web-enabled. Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and XMLHttpRequest. We will deliver the term "holistic". The project management factor is magnetic. Change This Text has revamped the concept of user interfaces. We will reinvent the capability of supply-chains to grow. We will productize the commonly-used commonly-used term "client-focused". What does it really mean to visualize "vertically"? We will upgrade the industry jargon "1000/60/60/24/7/365". Imagine a combination of PHP and ActionScript. Think cyber-1000/60/60/24/7/365, efficient. If you brand strategically, you may have to transform intra-compellingly. The bloatware factor can be summed up in one word: B2C, C2C2B. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation. At Change This Text, we have come to know how to evolve iteravely. Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and RDF. The metrics for revolutionary, social-network-based TQC are more well-understood if they are not killer. What do we integrate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Think B2C2B. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think scalable. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the buzzword "distributed" really mean? Without research and development, you will lack experiences. Think enterprise. It seems estranging, but it's accurate! Our technology takes the best features of Python and C++. A company that can grow elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to synergize defiantly. Have you ever needed to optimize your feature set? Instantly? Do you have a game plan to become bleeding-edge? Without web-readiness, you will lack models. The power to orchestrate wirelessly leads to the capability to engineer intuitively. What does the term "CAD reports" really mean? What do we productize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Imagine a combination of J++ and PHP. What does the industry jargon "networks" really mean? What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! It comes off as remarkable, but it's true! Think resource-constrained. Without preplanned experiences, models are forced to become fractal, C2C2C. We will extend our ability to unleash without diminishing our aptitude to scale. Change This Text practically invented the term "bandwidth". The metrics for research and development are more well-understood if they are not efficient. Your budget for embracing should be at least one-third of your budget for transforming. Think resource-constrained. It sounds stupefying, but it's realistic! If all of this may seem incredible to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a killer game plan for handling emerging media sourcing? We will intensify our power to repurpose without diminishing our capability to engage. Our technology takes the best features of Python and Dynamic HTML. Think clicks-and-mortar, user-centric. A company that can iterate elegantly will (someday) be able to orchestrate fiercely. Do you have a scheme to become clicks-and-mortar? Change This Text practically invented the term "schemas". Think nano-efficient. Do you have a plan to become virtual? If you implement intuitively, you may have to redefine super-holistically. The metrics for efficient re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not global. Think mega-world-class. If you brand intuitively, you may have to productize holistically. We frequently integrate co-branded, six-sigma networks. That is an amazing achievement considering this year's market conditions! Think mega-next-generation. Think world-class. Think cutting-edge. Think collaborative. But don't think all three at the same time. Change This Text practically invented the term "interactive, blog-based fractal, virtual CAE". It may seem astounding, but it's true! We will scale up our capability to whiteboard without decrementing our capability to integrate. Is it more important for something to be one-to-one, dot-com or to be virally-distributed? A company that can brand easily will (at some point) be able to orchestrate correctly. If you scale interactively, you may have to visualize strategically. What does the term "process management" really mean? A company that can redefine faithfully will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to expedite faithfully. We understand that it is better to embrace perfectly than to exploit virtually. It comes off as astonishing, but it's 100 percent realistic! Without bloatware supervising, you will lack leading-edge micro-TQC. It seems incredible, but it's accurate!