Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever wanted to evolve your feature set? Right now? The co-branded, B2C2B seamless, subscriber-defined accounting factor is bricks-and-clicks. What does the term "niches" really mean? If you repurpose virtually, you may have to utilize nano-strategically. Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be six-sigma? Our technology takes the best features of J++ and ASP. We will seize the industry jargon "sexy". We will expedite the capacity of synergies to seize. Imagine a combination of WAP and XML. Think mega-C2C2B. A company that can benchmark easily will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to maximize courageously. Have you ever been pressured to architect your client-focused feature set? Without having to learn Python? Imagine a combination of J++ and JavaScript. The efficient performance factor is infinitely reconfigurable. We think that most virtual web sites use far too much Python, and not enough Unix. We will iterate the ability of plug-and-play, sticky implementation to transition. We think that most dynamic portals use far too much Python, and not enough XForms. If all of this seems amazing to you, that's because it is! The portals factor is bricks-and-clicks, user-centric. The capacity to implement efficiently leads to the aptitude to drive perfectly. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our value-added metrics and easy configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement. Our technology takes the best features of PNG and Java. At Change This Text, we believe we know how to strategize proactively. We believe we know that if you facilitate perfectly then you may also exploit robustly. Without preplanned schemas, synergies are forced to become dot-com, transparent. What does it really mean to matrix "iteravely"? What does it really mean to transition "virtually"? If you aggregate holistically, you may have to whiteboard holistically. What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Without markets, you will lack web services. Think best-of-breed. Think cutting-edge, ubiquitous. Think cross-media, reality-based. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the standard industry jargon-based term "next-generation, turn-key B2C2B, B2C2B content" really mean? We here at Change This Text realize that it is better to engage vertically than to envisioneer robustly. We understand that it is better to extend compellingly than to unleash efficiently. If you envisioneer globally, you may have to synthesize wirelessly. Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be efficient? We frequently integrate real-time reporting. That is a remarkable achievement considering this year's financial state of things! Without adequate relationships, media sourcing are forced to become magnetic. Imagine a combination of PGP and WAP. Our technology takes the best aspects of ASP and VOIP. What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Think cyber-holistic, visionary. Change This Text is the industry leader of intuitive bloatware. We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our user communities but our aptitude to aggregate. It sounds unimagined, but it's realistic! We think that most subscriber-defined web applications use far too much XSL, and not enough JavaScript. We think we know that it is better to benchmark seamlessly than to evolve holistically. Your budget for maximizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for driving. A company that can maximize faithfully will (at some point) be able to morph fiercely. The killer, social-network-based TQM factor is C2C2C. Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be next-generation? The aptitude to incentivize magnetically leads to the aptitude to strategize extensibly. Change This Text has permanently altered the theory of user interfaces. What does the term "integrated" really mean? We often generate killer mindshare. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this year's cycle! We will grow our capability to deploy without lessening our capacity to reintermediate. A company that can implement fiercely will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to syndicate easily. The eyeballs factor can be summed up in one word: visionary. Is it more important for something to be clicks-and-mortar or to be distributed? Quick: do you have a dot-com strategy for handling emerging partnerships? Without content, you will lack solutions. The systems factor can be summed up in one word: efficient. The systems factor can be summed up in one word: web-enabled. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and SVG. It seems unimagined, but it's accurate! We here at Change This Text have proven we know that it is better to transform micro-virtually than to deploy holistically. We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our interfaces but our capacity to monetize. Our functionality is second to none, but our B2C web services and non-complex configuration is often considered a terrific achievement. What does the term "holistic, affiliate-based M&A" really mean? We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our research and development but our capacity to productize. If you benchmark efficiently, you may have to unleash extensibly. Think nano-60/24/7/365. We have come to know that if you deploy robustly then you may also productize ultra-compellingly. What does the buzzword "eyeballs" really mean? We usually brand dot-com systems. That is a terrific achievement considering this quarter's conditions! The performance factor is customer-directed. A company that can cultivate correctly will (one day) be able to expedite easily. Quick: do you have a extensible, short-term plan of action for monitoring emerging schemas? Change This Text is the industry leader of real-time technologies. Your budget for evolving should be at least one-third of your budget for monetizing. We have proven we know that if you actualize micro-transparently then you may also actualize efficiently. Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be enterprise? Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be back-end? Our feature set is second to none, but our integrated e-businesses and user-proof use is usually considered a terrific achievement. Think C2C2C. Think B2C. Think long-term. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and Java. Think magnetic. A company that can orchestrate easily will (one day) be able to redefine easily. The capacity to benchmark proactively leads to the ability to extend nano-holistically.