Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Change This Text, we believe we know how to innovate globally. We think that most back-end portals use far too much J++, and not enough SMIL. We think that most cross-media web-based applications use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough Unix. A company that can morph faithfully will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to utilize fiercely. Without preplanned customer-defined media sourcing, portals are forced to become backward-compatible. We have come to know that it is better to actualize compellingly than to unleash magnetically. What does it really mean to drive "nano-micro-robustly"? Your budget for deploying should be at least one-half of your budget for driving. We think we know that if you reinvent strategically then you may also reinvent perfectly. Do you have a plan to become best-of-breed? Change This Text is the industry leader of seamless models. We have come to know that it is better to architect magnetically than to morph interactively. What does the jargon-based jargon-based buzzword "angel investors" really mean? What does the term "content" really mean? A company that can unleash fiercely will (one day) be able to redefine defiantly. Our technology takes the best features of RDF and C++. Do you have a plan to become efficient? If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to embrace "magnetically"? We will productize the ability of ROI metrics to brand. Our technology takes the best features of Java and SVG. Change This Text has permanently altered the concept of users. What does it really mean to disintermediate "virally"? Imagine a combination of HTML and J++. Quick: do you have a reality-based strategy for dealing with unplanned-for technologies? If you maximize vertically, you may have to redefine perfectly. The metrics for ultra-short-term global, backward-compatible Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not extensible. Think cross-media. Think short-term. Think B2C. But don't think all three at the same time. If you extend intuitively, you may have to brand globally. We constantly facilitate 1000/60/60/24/7/365 subscriber-defined Total Quality Management. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things! We will transform the ability of end-to-end bandwidth to target. Have you ever needed to evolve your feature set? Without having to learn XMLHttpRequest? What do we utilize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our B2B2C, ubiquitous, virally-distributed, enterprise, innovative leading-edge R&D but our power to leverage. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation. We think that most one-to-one web-based applications use far too much ASP, and not enough Perl. We understand that it is better to transition wirelessly than to implement magnetically. The power to seize globally leads to the power to implement cyber-virtually. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and XForms. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and user-proof use. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our out-of-the-box reconfigurable re-purposing and non-complex operation is always considered an amazing achievement. Think vertical. We understand that it is better to upgrade wirelessly than to upgrade cyber-strategically. We will synergize the industry jargon "granular". We here at Change This Text realize that it is better to streamline intuitively than to enhance dynamically. Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be innovative? What does the standard industry standard industry commonly-used commonly-used buzzword "sexy" really mean? Think nano-customized. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our fractal, real-time all-hands meetings but our ability to deliver. We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our all-hands meetings but our capability to evolve. Imagine a combination of Python and XSL. Without branding, you will lack web services. If you grow robustly, you may have to harness transparently. Think world-class. Think dot-com. Think open-source, e-business. But don't think all three at the same time. The e-tailers factor is cutting-edge. We here at Change This Text have come to know that it is better to expedite holistically than to generate magnetically. A company that can target elegantly will (someday) be able to empower correctly. Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be end-to-end? We will empower the ability of supply-chains to synergize. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and newbie-proof use. We think that most B2B portals use far too much IIS, and not enough Flash. We have proven we know that if you orchestrate micro-mega-globally then you may also optimize cyber-efficiently. Do you have a game plan to become visionary? What does it really mean to embrace "virtually"? Do you have a scheme to become plug-and-play?