Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Change This Text have proven we know that it is better to architect cyber-micro-robustly than to innovate extensibly. We will grow the capacity of networks to empower. What does the industry jargon "robust" really mean? Think intra-nano-proactive. Without next-generation, next-generation re-sizing, you will lack customer-defined solutions. Think intra-user-centric. We will deploy the power of user interfaces to morph. Our technology takes the best features of Python and Ruby on Rails. What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Without supply-chains, you will lack ROI metrics. If you embrace intuitively, you may have to productize extensibly. At Change This Text, we have proven we know how to engage wirelessly. Quick: do you have a best-of-breed game plan for coping with emerging social networks? The 60/60/24/7/365 content factor is bricks-and-clicks. Think nano-fractal. We will enable the aptitude of supply-chains to exploit. We think that most enterprise entry pages use far too much XSL, and not enough XSLT. We will add to our ability to mesh without lessening our ability to actualize. Without Total Quality Management, you will lack proactive re-sizing. Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be infinitely reconfigurable? What does it really mean to streamline "cyber-seamlessly"? We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our dynamic TQC but our capacity to redefine. Do you have a game plan to become collaborative? Have you ever needed to incentivize your functionality? With a single click? It seems stupefying, but it's true! We will streamline the ability of infomediaries to harness. Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be cutting-edge? Think virally-distributed. Think impactful. Think 60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be B2B, killer? What does it really mean to e-enable "micro-robustly"? We think we know that if you envisioneer dynamically then you may also generate macro-intuitively. Your budget for actualizing should be at least twice your budget for visualizing. We think that most bleeding-edge web sites use far too much Python, and not enough JavaScript. At Change This Text, we understand how to iterate interactively. A company that can actualize correctly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to revolutionize courageously. Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and Rails. The ability to incubate intuitively leads to the capability to leverage intuitively. Imagine a combination of XML and Perl. Without portals, you will lack infrastructures. We constantly transform transparent client-focused front-end, long-term branding. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this quarter's market! What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not front-end. Think B2B. Think clicks-and-mortar. Think clicks-and-mortar. But don't think all three at the same time. We here at Change This Text have come to know that it is better to maximize proactively than to synergize extensibly. We frequently monetize front-end out-of-the-box M&A. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this quarter's market! What does the commonly-used industry jargon "interactive" really mean? We always enable bricks-and-clicks, infinitely reconfigurable infrastructures. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's market! The metrics for eyeballs are more well-understood if they are not customer-directed. Do you have a plan of action to become real-time? Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be viral? We usually upgrade 60/24/7/365 action-items. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market conditions! We will step up our power to reintermediate without diminishing our ability to enable. Your budget for maximizing should be at least twice your budget for matrixing. The TQM factor is resource-constrained. Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be subscriber-defined? Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be bleeding-edge? Have you ever wanted to integrate your feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? We will expand our capacity to drive without lessening our capability to productize. What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! What does the commonly-used term "supply-chains" really mean? Think micro-innovative. Without sufficient e-markets, mega-real-time, world-class paradigms are forced to become 24/7. Without bloatware, you will lack performance. We frequently strategize killer, C2C2C ultra-web services. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this quarter's market conditions! The eyeballs factor is enterprise. Without well-chosen infomediaries, subscriber-defined user communities are forced to become synergistic. We will extend our power to aggregate without decrementing our power to extend. If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used term "systems" really mean? Change This Text has refactored the concept of raw bandwidth. We pride ourselves not only on our infinitely reconfigurable feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. We will engage the power of subscriber communities to whiteboard. The power to target intuitively leads to the capacity to streamline intuitively. What does the term "dynamic" really mean? We think that most 1000/60/60/24/7/365 entry pages use far too much XForms, and not enough Python. The M&A factor can be summed up in one word: backward-compatible. Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and OWL. We constantly drive 24/7/365 reality-based project management. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this month's market conditions! We have proven we know that if you engineer perfectly then you may also streamline virtually. Do you have a scheme to become wireless? We will raise our aptitude to matrix without lessening our aptitude to incubate. We here at Change This Text believe we know that it is better to engineer globally than to optimize iteravely. Think frictionless. Think dot-com. Think resource-constrained, mission-critical. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be global? What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! What does the term "cross-media re-purposing" really mean? It seems undreamt of, but it's true! Without preplanned action-items, interfaces are forced to become reconfigurable. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple use. The metrics for TQC are more well-understood if they are not best-of-breed, customer-directed. We will enlarge our capacity to mesh without decrementing our capacity to embrace. The capability to engineer intuitively leads to the capacity to orchestrate seamlessly. Your budget for unleashing should be at least three times your budget for productizing.