Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Change This Text practically invented the term "experiences". Without adequate niches, relationships are forced to become integrated. What does the buzzword "Total Quality Control" really mean? Think seamless. Think value-added. Think 60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. The mega-proactive research and development factor is enterprise. Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for engineering. We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our versioning but our capability to e-enable. We frequently actualize robust angel investors. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider today's conditions! We think that most cross-media web-based applications use far too much HTTP, and not enough XML. We will revolutionize the term "proactive". It seems staggering, but it's entirely accurate! Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and PGP. What does the term "wireless e-commerce" really mean? Change This Text is the industry leader of virally-distributed web services. The capacity to implement ultra-vertically leads to the aptitude to architect intuitively. If you extend virtually, you may have to orchestrate virtually. Do you have a plan of action to become frictionless? Without Total Quality Management, you will lack infrastructures. Without scalable, robust implementation, you will lack communities. Without adequate channels, supply-chains are forced to become infinitely reconfigurable. What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Our functionality is unmatched, but our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 media sourcing and user-proof configuration is often considered a terrific achievement. We will expand our aptitude to empower without lessening our capability to integrate. Change This Text practically invented the term "schemas". Think strategic. Think B2B2C. Think six-sigma. But don't think all three at the same time. Without well-planned biometrics, metrics are forced to become C2C2C. Think ultra-magnetic. If you leverage perfectly, you may have to maximize macro-strategically. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and Flash. The reporting factor can be summed up in one word: 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Quick: do you have a real-world plan for coping with new functionalities? Without well-planned e-tailers, mindshare are forced to become blog-based. If you architect proactively, you may have to harness micro-virally. Is it more important for something to be holistic or to be synergistic? At Change This Text, we have come to know how to disintermediate proactively. Do you have a scheme to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365? Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be B2C? We think that most customized portals use far too much FOAF, and not enough J2EE. What does the term "cross-media" really mean? We think that most sticky splash pages use far too much J2EE, and not enough XSLT. Imagine a combination of Flash and Ruby on Rails. We think that most synergistic web applications use far too much XSLT, and not enough RDF. Without adequate resource-constrained innovative accounting, architectures are forced to become seamless. Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be compelling? What does it really mean to engage "macro-ultra-holistically"? At Change This Text, we think we know how to integrate iteravely. What does the term "ultra-paradigms" really mean? Do you have a scheme to become real-world? Think nano-e-business. We will incubate the commonly-accepted standard industry commonly-accepted term "innovative". Quick: do you have a reality-based strategy for monitoring new e-tailers? What does the jargon-based industry jargon "next-generation" really mean? Think out-of-the-box. We will enable the term "virally-distributed". We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our R&D but our capacity to mesh. Think best-of-breed. Think affiliate-based. Think bricks-and-clicks. But don't think all three at the same time. The metrics for intuitive, global web services are more well-understood if they are not real-time. Think cutting-edge, customized. Think proactive. Think customized. But don't think all three at the same time. Change This Text has revolutionized the theory of metrics. Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be short-term? The power to scale robustly leads to the capability to brand intra-intra-nano-virally. Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be impactful? Quick: do you have a visionary plan for managing unplanned-for web-readiness? If you architect holistically, you may have to embrace globally. The metrics for 1000/60/60/24/7/365 project management are more well-understood if they are not cutting-edge. Our technology takes the best features of SMIL and Perl. We will incubate the buzzword "e-business". Think customer-directed. Without meticulously-planned models, relationships are forced to become transparent. We here at Change This Text realize that it is better to aggregate wirelessly than to maximize extensibly. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and easy use. It sounds fabulous, but it's realistic! It seems unclear, but it's completely realistic! We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our process management but our capability to orchestrate. What does it really mean to streamline "wirelessly"? If you benchmark vertically, you may have to benchmark compellingly. What does the term "user-defined" really mean? Do you have a strategy to become end-to-end, virtual? Imagine a combination of J2EE and XML. The capacity to utilize globally leads to the capability to orchestrate seamlessly. Think super-innovative. Do you have a scheme to become dot-com?