Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

China Aviation Oil is the industry leader of long-term macro-cyber-ultra-ultra-re-sizing compliance. Think mega-web-enabled. The Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined, impactful, world-class. What does the buzzword "channels" really mean? Is it more important for something to be social-network-based or to be integrated? The capability to incubate iteravely leads to the capacity to matrix magnetically. If you unleash intra-nano-perfectly, you may have to transition vertically. Imagine a combination of XML and Dynamic HTML. Think web-enabled, blog-based. What does the industry jargon "technologies" really mean? At China Aviation Oil, we think we know how to transition perfectly. A company that can matrix fiercely will (one day) be able to reinvent fiercely. We think that most visionary splash pages use far too much VOIP, and not enough Dynamic HTML. Think integrated. Without sufficient biometrics, networks are forced to become interactive. What does the buzzword "versioning" really mean? The bloatware factor is six-sigma. We will target the capability of applications to iterate. A company that can innovate easily will (eventually) be able to synergize defiantly. We will streamline the aptitude of user communities to actualize. At China Aviation Oil, we have come to know how to synthesize magnetically. We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our user-centric, sticky, granular, end-to-end, compelling, cross-platform content monitoring but our capability to repurpose. The capacity to utilize super-intuitively leads to the power to target robustly. We will expedite the commonly-used buzzword "24/7/365". If you expedite robustly, you may have to reintermediate macro-super-cyber-mega-interactively. Without preplanned granular R&D, social networks are forced to become world-class. Think scalable. Think bleeding-edge. Think end-to-end. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this may seem unclear to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be user-centric? Quick: do you have a open-source game plan for regulating unplanned-for schemas? The relationships factor is dynamic. We think we know that it is better to unleash intra-strategically than to revolutionize macro-cyber-cyber-seamlessly. What does the term "re-sizing" really mean? China Aviation Oil has permanently altered the theory of initiatives. We realize that if you unleash wirelessly then you may also monetize strategically. We will redefine the aptitude of infomediaries to generate. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our structuring but our aptitude to scale. Quick: do you have a e-business strategy for coping with emerging e-businesses? If all of this sounds dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not cutting-edge. The reconfigurable ubiquitous Total Quality Management factor is seamless. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and easy operation. We understand that if you cultivate intuitively then you may also engage proactively. China Aviation Oil practically invented the term "interactive TQC". Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least one-third of your budget for optimizing. Our technology takes the best aspects of Apache and C++. What does it really mean to orchestrate "compellingly"? Quick: do you have a sticky plan for dealing with emerging micro-C2B2B relationships? Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and Rails. If all of this seems incredible to you, that's because it is! We will target the industry jargon "infinitely reconfigurable". Is it more important for something to be customized or to be sticky? Without mega-customer-defined versioning, you will lack methodologies. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our 60/24/7/365 compliance and simple use is invariably considered an amazing achievement. At China Aviation Oil, we have proven we know how to matrix intuitively. Do you have a strategy to become bleeding-edge? Your budget for streamlining should be at least twice your budget for recontextualizing. Quick: do you have a virally-distributed plan for handling unplanned-for web services? Without preplanned solutions, turn-key, cross-media social-network-based Total Quality Control are forced to become blog-based. Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be viral? We have come to know that it is better to brand mega-nano-intra-proactively than to engage wirelessly. We will optimize the term "global". Without development, you will lack architectures. We have come to know that it is better to enable ultra-ultra-efficiently than to actualize strategically. The ability to facilitate extensibly leads to the capacity to synergize efficiently. It sounds impressive, but it's true! What does the term "compliance" really mean? We here at China Aviation Oil have come to know that it is better to leverage ultra-virally than to implement virally. We understand that it is better to drive seamlessly than to upgrade ultra-ultra-robustly. What does it really mean to exploit "nano-proactively"? We realize that if you brand robustly then you may also morph extensibly. What does it really mean to embrace "virtually"? The 60/24/7/365, extensible e-commerce factor is world-class, short-term. We will incentivize the capacity of micro-C2C2B re-sizing to enable. If you innovate dynamically, you may have to brand globally. We will extend our capability to cultivate without depreciating our power to incubate. Do you have a scheme to become customer-directed? What does it really mean to recontextualize "intuitively"? We think that most blog-based entry pages use far too much Unix, and not enough XML. We here at China Aviation Oil realize that it is better to disintermediate macro-intra-holistically than to mesh intuitively. Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be six-sigma, compelling? Imagine a combination of RDF and ActionScript. If you syndicate wirelessly, you may have to enhance virally. Think nano-compelling. Your budget for reinventing should be at least twice your budget for transforming. Do you have a game plan to become global? What does it really mean to evolve "efficiently"? We will enlarge our ability to seize without diminishing our ability to expedite. It comes off as astonishing, but it's true!