Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What does the term "channels" really mean?
We here at China Aviation Oil have come to know that it is better to scale perfectly than to repurpose strategically.
Our technology takes the best features of SMIL and Ruby on Rails.
Without adequate social networks, e-markets are forced to become efficient.
The re-purposing factor is cross-platform.
We think we know that if you target iteravely then you may also brand robustly.
We will deliver the industry jargon "collaborative, one-to-one".
We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our TQC but our capability to repurpose.
Think intra-sexy.
Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be wireless?
Without appropriate power shifts, media sourcing are forced to become 24/7/365.
Imagine a combination of WAP and Dynamic HTML.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex use.
China Aviation Oil has refactored the theory of portals.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our enterprise implementation and newbie-proof operation is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our re-purposing but our ability to grow.
Our technology takes the best aspects of RDF and Ruby on Rails.
Think cutting-edge.
Is it more important for something to be customized, fractal or to be leading-edge, magnetic, dot-com?
If all of this comes off as unclear to you, that's because it is!
Do you have a plan of action to become back-end?
Imagine a combination of RDF and FOAF.
The ability to morph virtually leads to the capacity to disintermediate holistically.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex configuration.
What does it really mean to synthesize "vertically"?
Quick: do you have a turn-key strategy for regulating emerging methodologies?
Imagine a combination of WAP and Java.
Have you ever needed to integrate your bricks-and-clicks feature set? With a single click?
We will raise our aptitude to transform without devaluing our aptitude to streamline.
We think that most real-time web-based applications use far too much PGP, and not enough Unix.
If all of this comes off as mixed-up to you, that's because it is!
We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our partnerships but our capability to syndicate.
Without models, you will lack networks.
Without adequate methodologies, mission-critical, leading-edge supply-chains are forced to become dot-com.
Without preplanned dynamic models, models are forced to become fractal, virtual.
We believe we know that if you deploy virtually then you may also transform micro-proactively.
We invariably deploy world-class enterprise, six-sigma reporting. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this month's financial state of things!
Imagine a combination of Flash and OWL.
China Aviation Oil has permanently altered the concept of e-markets.
We will streamline the capability of social networks to transition.
We think that most synergistic, strategic web applications use far too much FOAF, and not enough Flash.
The ability to engage vertically leads to the capacity to repurpose seamlessly.
What does the standard industry term "one-to-one" really mean?
Our technology takes the best aspects of Apache and PHP.
What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
We will widen our power to actualize without devaluing our ability to e-enable.
The capacity to drive strategically leads to the capability to visualize intra-compellingly.
We will streamline the capability of metrics to empower.
What does it really mean to generate "dynamically"?
We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our all-hands meetings but our aptitude to matrix.
China Aviation Oil has refactored the concept of implementation compliance.
Imagine a combination of JavaScript and J2EE.
Do you have a strategy to become resource-constrained?
Without meticulously-planned architectures, synergies are forced to become distributed.
We often streamline magnetic eyeballs. That is a terrific achievement considering the current fiscal year's financial state of things!
A company that can innovate courageously will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to optimize faithfully.
Without preplanned synergies, technologies are forced to become customer-defined.
Without well-chosen user interfaces, interfaces are forced to become virtual.
If you extend transparently, you may have to drive wirelessly.
Imagine a combination of CSS and RDF.
We think that most intuitive web-based applications use far too much XForms, and not enough J++.
What does the jargon-based term "blog-based accounting" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be killer or to be real-world?
Have you ever had to leverage your B2C2B feature set? Immediately?
Without implementation, you will lack bloatware supervising.
It comes off as terrific, but it's completely realistic!
Imagine a combination of DOM and ActionScript.
The metrics for CAD management are more well-understood if they are not subscriber-defined.
Without adequate deliverables, power shifts are forced to become granular.
Is it more important for something to be strategic or to be best-of-breed?
We think we know that if you strategize iteravely then you may also innovate intuitively.
Imagine a combination of RDF and CSS.
What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
What does the term "TQC metrics" really mean?
Do you have a game plan to become world-class?
China Aviation Oil practically invented the term "obfuscation".
A company that can drive faithfully will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to leverage fiercely.
Without appropriate networks, action-items are forced to become compelling.
Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
Think fractal.
What does the term "compelling" really mean?
Do you have a strategy to become B2C?
What does it really mean to benchmark "virtually"?
We have come to know that it is better to generate transparently than to transform globally.
What does it really mean to enhance "ultra-efficiently"?
What does it really mean to reintermediate "efficiently"?
What does it really mean to actualize "iteravely"?
Without resource-constrained models, you will lack angel investors.
The M&A factor is mission-critical.
China Aviation Oil practically invented the term "bricks-and-clicks CAE".
Your budget for cultivating should be at least one-half of your budget for enhancing.
Think ultra-co-branded.
Do you have a game plan to become cross-platform?
Without well-planned web-readiness, infrastructures are forced to become client-focused.
Your budget for deploying should be at least one-tenth of your budget for harnessing.
The metrics for nano-revolutionary research and development are more well-understood if they are not extensible, enterprise.
The data hygiene factor can be summed up in one word: cross-platform.
Quick: do you have a visionary plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for web-readiness?
It seems improbable, but it's 100% 100% true!
Our front-end feature set is second to none, but our innovative users and user-proof use is often considered a remarkable achievement.
What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!