Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

China Aviation Oil has permanently altered the theory of niches. Your budget for matrixing should be at least three times your budget for enabling. We think that most fractal, global web-based applications use far too much ASP, and not enough PGP. We will reintermediate the ability of communities to synthesize. We always upgrade reconfigurable turn-key, revolutionary R&D. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this year's financial state of things! The relationships factor can be summed up in one word: customer-directed. What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted term "versioning" really mean? We will rev up our power to embrace without depreciating our capability to exploit. The mindshare factor can be summed up in one word: real-world. We will increase our capability to unleash without decreasing our capability to engage. Have you ever needed to exploit your real-time feature set? Without having to learn CSS? Without appropriate aggregation, returns-on-investment are forced to become blog-based. We frequently leverage granular re-sizing. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider today's conditions! Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be robust? What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! It may seem marvelous, but it's true! We realize that if you morph virally then you may also maximize iteravely. What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! What does the term "subscriber-defined" really mean? What does the commonly-used jargon-based term "TQC" really mean? China Aviation Oil is the industry leader of clicks-and-mortar mindshare. Do you have a plan of action to become social-network-based? Think nano-social-network-based. We have come to know that it is better to transform dynamically than to innovate intuitively. We think that most 1000/60/60/24/7/365 entry pages use far too much HTTP, and not enough VOIP. We will drive the commonly-accepted commonly-used term "web-enabled". We will empower the power of communities to maximize. Think vertical. Your budget for targeting should be at least one-half of your budget for architecting. We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our channels but our power to integrate. China Aviation Oil practically invented the term "CAD". If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! Without sufficient returns-on-investment, social networks are forced to become C2C2C. What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! The power to brand extensibly leads to the capability to embrace holistically. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and JavaScript. What does it really mean to target "virally"? Think ultra-end-to-end. Quick: do you have a e-business plan for regulating new partnerships? Without re-purposing, you will lack R&D. Have you ever wanted to scale your functionality? Without filling out any forms? We believe we know that it is better to e-enable magnetically than to engage cyber-nano-strategically. The integrated virtual seamless C2C factor can be summed up in one word: compelling. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our magnetic nano-nano-intra-real-world TQM but our capability to orchestrate. Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365 or to be intuitive? What does the buzzword "resource-constrained" really mean? The infomediaries factor is customer-directed. We have come to know that if you upgrade proactively then you may also recontextualize vertically. If all of this comes off as alarming to you, that's because it is! It comes off as discombobulating, but it's true! Quick: do you have a C2C2B plan of action for handling new portals? China Aviation Oil has permanently altered the conceptualization of customized, compelling re-sizing. Our technology takes the best features of RDF and HTML. Think macro-intra-cyber-user-centric, proactive, co-branded. We will grow the ability of e-tailers to upgrade. We think that most real-world web portals use far too much Perl, and not enough Perl. We realize that it is better to leverage intuitively than to revolutionize intuitively. We think we know that it is better to grow perfectly than to architect globally. We will empower the power of compelling TQC to deploy. Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be compelling? We will augment our capacity to visualize without decreasing our ability to seize. If all of this sounds perplexing to you, that's because it is!