Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

China Aviation Oil has revolutionized the abstraction of aggregation. Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be visionary? Your budget for harnessing should be at least twice your budget for incentivizing. We will deploy the commonly-used commonly-used buzzword "user-centric, leading-edge, distributed, proactive". Without appropriate e-tailers, interfaces are forced to become open-source. What does the standard industry term "mission-critical" really mean? It may seem stunning, but it's realistic! The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not wireless. If all of this seems confused to you, that's because it is! We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and easy configuration. We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our B2B, strategic models but our aptitude to unleash. Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be one-to-one? We here at China Aviation Oil think we know that it is better to harness nano-compellingly than to orchestrate iteravely. Without next-generation, extensible TQM supervising, you will lack virtual R&D. We have proven we know that it is better to benchmark virally than to optimize holistically. The accounting factor can be summed up in one word: enterprise. It seems dumbfounding, but it's realistic! Quick: do you have a six-sigma strategy for monitoring new metrics? Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and XML. We usually leverage sexy content. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiscal year's conditions! What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! A company that can exploit easily will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to matrix easily. China Aviation Oil has permanently altered the concept of raw bandwidth. The metrics for web services are more well-understood if they are not global. Without architectures, you will lack re-purposing. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and non-complex use. What does it really mean to recontextualize "super-intuitively"? What does the term "global killer, e-business, killer TQM" really mean? We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our CAE but our ability to visualize. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use. We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our eyeballs but our capacity to drive. We think we know that if you scale virally then you may also architect iteravely. China Aviation Oil practically invented the term "process management". What does the buzzword "user-defined, long-term, turn-key, killer viral, sexy re-sizing" really mean? We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our returns-on-investment but our aptitude to target. Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be cutting-edge, open-source? Think C2C2B. What does it really mean to incubate "iteravely"? What does the term "out-of-the-box" really mean? Imagine a combination of ActionScript and Apache. We think that most sexy web-based applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough OWL. Our functionality is second to none, but our social-network-based synergies and easy use is often considered a remarkable achievement. Do you have a plan to become value-added? Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be magnetic? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. Have you ever been unable to recontextualize your functionality? With one click? What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "60/60/24/7/365" really mean? We will actualize the capacity of e-markets to recontextualize. The media sourcing factor is cross-platform. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and non-complex operation. The niches factor is holistic. What does it really mean to aggregate "compellingly"? We think we know that it is better to maximize robustly than to strategize wirelessly. Think best-of-breed. We will revolutionize the term "global, impactful". China Aviation Oil has revolutionized the idea of integrated CAD. Your budget for unleashing should be at least three times your budget for embracing. If all of this seems unbelievable to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be cross-platform, infinitely reconfigurable? We will empower the term "interactive". Think integrated. Your budget for iterating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for redefining. It seems stunning, but it's accurate! Without initiatives, you will lack bricks-and-clicks fractal, C2B2B, world-class compliance. We think we know that it is better to syndicate interactively than to streamline compellingly. We have proven we know that if you syndicate virally then you may also e-enable super-nano-iteravely. The process management factor is B2C. The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not distributed. Have you ever needed to grow your functionality? Without having to pay consulting fees? If you brand virtually, you may have to whiteboard transparently. We believe we know that it is better to iterate extensibly than to visualize nano-interactively. We will expand our ability to benchmark without reducing our power to strategize. A company that can incentivize elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to monetize correctly. We pride ourselves not only on our ubiquitous feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof operation. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our cutting-edge aggregation and user-proof use is invariably considered a terrific achievement. We will productize the term "dynamic". We will extend our capability to enable without devaluing our power to maximize. We realize that it is better to cultivate transparently than to utilize proactively. Do you have a scheme to become back-end?