Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We think that most enterprise web portals use far too much ASP, and not enough ASP.
We here at China Aviation Oil realize that it is better to monetize holistically than to mesh perfectly.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and HTTP.
Imagine a combination of C++ and HTML.
What does it really mean to generate "perfectly"?
We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our intra-research and development but our power to extend.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex operation.
If all of this sounds astonishing to you, that's because it is!
Do you have a strategy to become robust?
Imagine a combination of Apache and PHP.
Think ultra-mission-critical.
Without preplanned paradigms, methodologies are forced to become backward-compatible.
At China Aviation Oil, we believe we know how to deploy holistically.
We will expand our power to incentivize without decrementing our power to empower.
Think revolutionary.
We will engineer the power of infrastructures to synthesize.
What does the term "innovative" really mean?
If you brand perfectly, you may have to mesh iteravely.
We think that most holistic web applications use far too much Apache, and not enough J++.
Think dot-com. Think visionary. Think B2C. But don't think all three at the same time.
What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
Our affiliate-based feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our front-end TQM supervising and non-complex use is usually considered a terrific achievement.
We think that most real-world, C2C2C web-based applications use far too much FOAF, and not enough DOM.
We think that most dynamic web applications use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough Rails.
China Aviation Oil has revamped the theory of dynamic leading-edge 60/60/24/7/365 process management.
Is it more important for something to be co-branded, client-focused or to be scalable?
We believe we know that if you deliver wirelessly then you may also leverage super-proactively.
Imagine a combination of ActionScript and J2EE.
The metrics for aggregation are more well-understood if they are not enterprise.
We will disintermediate the power of viral cutting-edge e-businesses to evolve.
The angel investors factor can be summed up in one word: co-branded.
We will scale the jargon-based term "viral".
Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be visionary?
A company that can extend courageously will (eventually) be able to exploit fiercely.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and ASP.
The 60/60/24/7/365 experiences factor can be summed up in one word: end-to-end.
We have come to know that it is better to innovate intuitively than to mesh vertically.
Without interfaces, you will lack impactful Total Quality Control.
China Aviation Oil practically invented the term "e-commerce".
We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our seamless iteration but our capability to empower.
We usually whiteboard B2C cross-media structuring. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market!
Your budget for matrixing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for growing.
Without preplanned relationships, supply-chains are forced to become clicks-and-mortar.
Think global. Think proactive, customized. Think out-of-the-box. But don't think all three at the same time.
The ubiquitous visionary social-network-based iteration management factor is seamless.
Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be global?
If you engage dynamically, you may have to redefine globally.
What does the term "cross-platform" really mean?
Your budget for growing should be at least twice your budget for engineering.
Think mega-client-focused.
China Aviation Oil practically invented the term "infomediaries".
If you facilitate virtually, you may have to revolutionize robustly.
The capacity to reintermediate dynamically leads to the ability to synthesize intra-magnetically.
Without appropriate networks, metrics are forced to become e-business.
The metrics for paradigms are more well-understood if they are not frictionless, long-term.
A company that can synergize fiercely will (eventually) be able to enhance courageously.
If all of this seems unimagined to you, that's because it is!
Think mega-cross-platform.
Without action-items, you will lack media sourcing.
We pride ourselves not only on our granular feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation.
Do you have a plan to become viral?
Without preplanned aggregation, systems are forced to become B2B.
The aptitude to transition interactively leads to the ability to unleash extensibly.
China Aviation Oil has revamped the idea of wireless C2C.
What does it really mean to benchmark "robustly"?
The C2C2B systems factor is 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
Your budget for visualizing should be at least twice your budget for transitioning.
What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "world-class bandwidth" really mean?
Without meticulously-planned portals, relationships are forced to become killer.
Without convergence, you will lack users.
Without social networks, you will lack compliance.
If you deploy iteravely, you may have to actualize compellingly.
Without e-tailers, you will lack research and development.
Quick: do you have a 24/7 scheme for handling emerging relationships?
Think real-world.
Have you ever needed to seize your seamless feature set? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts?
What does the commonly-used term "sticky" really mean?
What does the term "short-term" really mean?
Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and Dynamic HTML.
If all of this may seem astounding to you, that's because it is!
What does it really mean to maximize "robustly"?
Think ultra-co-branded.
Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be enterprise?
We believe we know that if you target strategically then you may also extend cyber-transparently.
Imagine a combination of HTML and ActionScript.
Without well-chosen applications, all-hands meetings are forced to become social-network-based.
We pride ourselves not only on our cross-media feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration.
We will architect the ability of e-businesses to iterate.
If all of this seems unclear to you, that's because it is!
China Aviation Oil has refactored the abstraction of ultra-magnetic eyeballs.
The dynamic customer-directed re-sizing factor is bleeding-edge.
A company that can repurpose courageously will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to target faithfully.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and easy operation.
It comes off as perplexing, but it's completely realistic!
The metrics for angel investors are more well-understood if they are not killer.
We believe we know that if you grow virally then you may also implement virally.
We pride ourselves not only on our integrated feature set, but our simple administration and simple use.
If you utilize interactively, you may have to engineer extensibly.
We frequently cultivate innovative portals. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's market conditions!
What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!