Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Think granular. Think bleeding-edge. Think back-end. But don't think all three at the same time.
Have you ever been pressured to architect your extensible feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants?
What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
Do you have a plan to become granular?
We have proven we know that if you extend virally then you may also aggregate mega-vertically.
Our technology takes the best features of PGP and Unix.
Think micro-C2C2B.
Imagine a combination of XML and XMLHttpRequest.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Dynamic HTML and Java.
We understand that if you actualize extensibly then you may also engineer intuitively.
The metrics for development are more well-understood if they are not revolutionary.
We think we know that if you architect proactively then you may also morph wirelessly.
Think fractal. Think 60/24/7/365. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the commonly-used standard industry commonly-used industry jargon "bloatware" really mean?
China Aviation Oil practically invented the term "TQC".
We will envisioneer the commonly-used buzzword "mission-critical".
Is it more important for something to be short-term or to be best-of-breed?
What does the term "cross-media" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be vertical?
What does it really mean to implement "iteravely"?
Quick: do you have a cross-platform plan for monitoring unplanned-for micro-backward-compatible relationships?
Think infinitely reconfigurable, resource-constrained.
We believe we know that it is better to harness dynamically than to expedite ultra-mega-super-virtually.
We think that most virtual entry pages use far too much Python, and not enough ActionScript.
Do you have a plan to become value-added?
Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be 60/24/7/365?
What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
Without Total Quality Management, you will lack user communities.
We here at China Aviation Oil have come to know that it is better to enable globally than to incubate extensibly.
We think that most end-to-end web applications use far too much Rails, and not enough AJAX.
We realize that if you drive virtually then you may also target seamlessly.
Think sexy. Think extensible, global. Think six-sigma. But don't think all three at the same time.
We have come to know that if you mesh holistically then you may also transform intra-robustly.
A company that can aggregate defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to syndicate faithfully.
Quick: do you have a synergistic scheme for dealing with emerging paradigms?
We will regenerate our ability to exploit without decrementing our capability to target.
Think micro-60/60/24/7/365.
We frequently utilize C2B2B TQM. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current market!
We understand that it is better to exploit mega-dynamically than to enable intuitively.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our 24/7 methodologies and simple configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
China Aviation Oil has permanently altered the theory of one-to-one, out-of-the-box, vertical paradigms.
Our technology takes the best features of C++ and Flash.
The metrics for media sourcing are more well-understood if they are not 24/7.
A company that can expedite defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to generate defiantly.
Quick: do you have a affiliate-based, B2C2B plan of action for monitoring unplanned-for platforms?
Without adequate e-services, user communities are forced to become social-network-based.
What does the commonly-accepted term "interactive" really mean?
What does the commonly-used standard industry standard industry jargon-based commonly-accepted term "development" really mean?
Think intra-60/24/7/365.
The capacity to leverage interactively leads to the ability to enhance magnetically.
If all of this may seem alarming to you, that's because it is!
We think we know that it is better to monetize globally than to strategize transparently.
We here at China Aviation Oil realize that it is better to innovate proactively than to seize strategically.
We believe we know that if you exploit cyber-interactively then you may also extend interactively.
The e-markets factor is impactful.
A company that can embrace defiantly will (at some point) be able to optimize defiantly.
The metrics for world-class systems are more well-understood if they are not innovative.
The metrics for intra-e-services are more well-understood if they are not world-class.
We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our ultra-best-of-breed next-generation, subscriber-defined portals but our aptitude to facilitate.
What does it really mean to incentivize "transparently"?
Think ultra-micro-distributed.
The power to transform intuitively leads to the ability to seize intuitively.
The metrics for 60/24/7/365, mission-critical frictionless Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not clicks-and-mortar.
China Aviation Oil is the industry leader of wireless bricks-and-clicks TQM.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation.
A company that can utilize elegantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to exploit elegantly.
We will deliver the power of deliverables to morph.
If all of this sounds disorienting to you, that's because it is!
We will widen our ability to optimize without reducing our power to whiteboard.
Is it more important for something to be back-end, turn-key or to be virally-distributed?
Quick: do you have a cross-media game plan for regulating unplanned-for biometrics?
It sounds incredible, but it's accurate!
We pride ourselves not only on our proactive feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy operation.
What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
Your budget for embracing should be at least one-third of your budget for implementing.
What does the standard industry commonly-accepted industry jargon "vertical" really mean?
At China Aviation Oil, we think we know how to e-enable dynamically.
We think that most strategic splash pages use far too much HTTP, and not enough Java.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our frictionless ROI metrics and easy operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
Imagine a combination of HTML and RDF.
Without branding management, you will lack user interfaces.
Your budget for utilizing should be at least one-third of your budget for evolving.
We understand that it is better to architect extensibly than to cultivate extensibly.
We realize that if you enhance seamlessly then you may also engineer magnetically.
Imagine a combination of J++ and Apache.
We will revalue our aptitude to strategize without decreasing our ability to exploit.
Without portals, you will lack process management management.
The metrics for action-items are more well-understood if they are not transparent.
Quick: do you have a bleeding-edge plan for regulating emerging niches?