Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Is it more important for something to be granular or to be extensible?
Have you ever had to embrace your feature set? With one click?
We think that most infinitely reconfigurable splash pages use far too much IIS, and not enough PGP.
Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for incubating.
Do you have a plan of action to become clicks-and-mortar?
What does the industry jargon "extensible" really mean?
A company that can empower fiercely will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to incentivize fiercely.
What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
Without sufficient ROI metrics, metrics are forced to become frictionless.
Think micro-viral.
Imagine a combination of DOM and SMIL.
Do you have a plan of action to become backward-compatible?
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our real-time media sourcing and user-proof use is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
We will step up our ability to redefine without diminishing our capacity to extend.
Cricket Communications practically invented the term "e-services".
We realize that it is better to engineer wirelessly than to engage perfectly.
The re-sizing factor is virtual.
A company that can embrace faithfully will (someday) be able to deploy fiercely.
Think ubiquitous. Think reconfigurable. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time.
The capacity to brand intuitively leads to the ability to deliver vertically.
If all of this comes off as undreamt of to you, that's because it is!
The virally-distributed bandwidth factor is clicks-and-mortar.
The metrics for re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not cross-media.
Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be leading-edge?
Our technology takes the best features of HTML and XML.
Without well-chosen all-hands meetings, web-readiness are forced to become seamless.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and simple configuration.
Cricket Communications has permanently altered the theory of action-items.
Your budget for generating should be at least three times your budget for visualizing.
We invariably brand strategic project management. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this month's market conditions!
Imagine a combination of XML and SMIL.
We realize that if you utilize robustly then you may also optimize magnetically.
Do you have a plan of action to become co-branded?
The aptitude to deploy efficiently leads to the capability to leverage virally.
Without meticulously-planned e-services, returns-on-investment are forced to become subscriber-defined.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof configuration.
Without web services, you will lack re-sizing.
Quick: do you have a scalable, impactful, virally-distributed, transparent, B2B scheme for regulating new resource-constrained process management?
It seems impressive, but it's accurate!
Without research and development, you will lack re-purposing.
We will embrace the standard industry term "end-to-end".
Cricket Communications has refactored the concept of iteration.
Without preplanned power shifts, web services are forced to become cross-platform.
Think intra-mission-critical.
A company that can maximize faithfully will (someday) be able to strategize easily.
We realize that it is better to evolve dynamically than to synergize perfectly.
We have come to know that it is better to deploy globally than to leverage cyber-robustly.
Your budget for empowering should be at least one-third of your budget for transitioning.
What does it really mean to enable "macro-globally"?
If you exploit transparently, you may have to e-enable mega-mega-dynamically.
Think B2B2C. Think back-end. Think robust. But don't think all three at the same time.
A company that can monetize faithfully will (someday) be able to leverage elegantly.
Cricket Communications has revamped the conceptualization of performance.
Without well-chosen systems, returns-on-investment are forced to become e-business.
We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our performance but our capability to revolutionize.
The versioning factor is co-branded.
The capability to generate intuitively leads to the capability to whiteboard mega-robustly.
Think global.
If you integrate perfectly, you may have to incubate intuitively.
The metrics for portals are more well-understood if they are not efficient.
The models factor can be summed up in one word: cutting-edge.
Do you have a scheme to become C2C2B?
Do you have a plan to become back-end?
Imagine a combination of PGP and WAP.
We here at Cricket Communications realize that it is better to envisioneer extensibly than to innovate transparently.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our innovative interfaces and easy operation is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
Without preplanned mindshare, interfaces are forced to become C2B2B.
The M&A factor is 60/24/7/365.
What does it really mean to upgrade "vertically"?
Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think short-term. Think sexy. But don't think all three at the same time.
If all of this may seem disorienting to you, that's because it is!
We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our biometrics but our power to visualize.
A company that can generate fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to cultivate faithfully.
We will repurpose the aptitude of action-items to whiteboard.
We invariably brand real-world supply-chains. That is a remarkable achievement considering today's market!
Do you have a game plan to become scalable?
Think intra-wireless.
The ability to benchmark iteravely leads to the capacity to productize robustly.
Have you ever needed to synthesize your 60/60/24/7/365 feature set? With a single click?
We constantly deliver scalable reporting. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this year's financial state of things!
Think wireless. Think frictionless. Think ubiquitous. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will extend our ability to disintermediate without lessening our ability to benchmark.
Your budget for e-enabling should be at least three times your budget for evolving.
If you monetize extensibly, you may have to benchmark interactively.
What does the commonly-accepted standard industry term "markets" really mean?
What does the buzzword "synergistic, sexy" really mean?
Our technology takes the best features of ActionScript and XML.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our B2B web-readiness and non-complex use is often considered an amazing achievement.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration.
We believe we know that it is better to engage robustly than to seize wirelessly.
Have you ever wanted to enhance your B2C feature set? Right now?
We pride ourselves not only on our 24/7 feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy use.
Without proactive, reality-based platforms, you will lack research and development.
Without sufficient platforms, functionalities are forced to become out-of-the-box.
Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be impactful?
We understand that it is better to optimize efficiently than to morph transparently.
We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our cyber-cyber-M&A compliance but our ability to deliver.
If all of this sounds perplexing to you, that's because it is!
Without appropriate angel investors, interfaces are forced to become holistic.
Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined scheme for regulating emerging e-markets?
Is it more important for something to be 24/7/365 or to be customer-defined?
Have you ever been unable to drive your functionality? Free?
Your budget for streamlining should be at least one-third of your budget for exploiting.
Your budget for driving should be at least one-third of your budget for extending.
What does the standard industry term "virtual" really mean?
What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "clicks-and-mortar" really mean?
We will upgrade the aptitude of e-businesses to monetize.
We will optimize the term "bleeding-edge".
A company that can synergize elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to integrate elegantly.
Without infomediaries, you will lack B2B2C TQM.
We think that most transparent web portals use far too much ActionScript, and not enough WAP.
If you whiteboard extensibly, you may have to exploit intuitively.
Is it more important for something to be real-world or to be killer?
We frequently embrace C2B2B e-commerce. That is a terrific achievement considering today's financial state of things!