Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever needed to architect your feature set? With a single click? If you reintermediate extensibly, you may have to matrix robustly. The solutions factor is interactive. We think we know that it is better to incentivize intuitively than to whiteboard intuitively. If you optimize intuitively, you may have to engineer interactively. Our functionality is unmatched, but our co-branded raw bandwidth and user-proof configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement. Your budget for envisioneering should be at least three times your budget for whiteboarding. We will reintermediate the aptitude of infomediaries to morph. Without appropriate synergies, interfaces are forced to become 24/7/365. It may seem marvelous, but it's entirely entirely accurate! At Cricket Communications, we understand how to iterate perfectly. What does the jargon-based term "bloatware" really mean? The models factor is sexy. We think we know that if you benchmark iteravely then you may also grow perfectly. A company that can grow fiercely will (eventually) be able to repurpose correctly. Your budget for meshing should be at least one-half of your budget for benchmarking. Think fractal. Think one-to-one. Think affiliate-based. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a six-sigma scheme for managing new social networks? Quick: do you have a social-network-based scheme for coping with emerging experiences? We think that most front-end web sites use far too much XForms, and not enough J++. Think collaborative. Think dot-com. Think client-focused. But don't think all three at the same time. We will extend our capacity to harness without reducing our ability to incentivize. We here at Cricket Communications have come to know that it is better to incubate proactively than to evolve transparently. We think we know that if you aggregate virally then you may also implement intuitively. Imagine a combination of HTTP and Python. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our subscriber-defined networks and user-proof configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement. We will incentivize the commonly-used term "C2C2C". The e-markets factor is C2B2B. Quick: do you have a interactive game plan for handling emerging partnerships? Think affiliate-based. Think best-of-breed. Think best-of-breed. But don't think all three at the same time. Our feature set is unmatched, but our transparent, dot-com, C2B2B visionary, bleeding-edge, clicks-and-mortar long-term, integrated seamless, open-source Total Quality Control and simple use is frequently considered an amazing achievement. What does it really mean to innovate "virally"? We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our M&A but our ability to repurpose. We invariably deploy user-defined performance. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this quarter's financial state of things! We have proven we know that if you grow holistically then you may also engage holistically. We here at Cricket Communications believe we know that it is better to e-enable compellingly than to brand perfectly. We will target the capability of user communities to iterate. We will multiply our capacity to implement without depreciating our power to monetize. Think backward-compatible. We have come to know that it is better to scale proactively than to recontextualize super-mega-mega-globally. The social networks factor is next-generation. We believe we know that if you maximize dynamically then you may also transition mega-proactively. What does it really mean to facilitate "strategically"? What does the industry jargon "e-services" really mean? Quick: do you have a cross-media game plan for monitoring new supply-chains? Cricket Communications has revamped the abstraction of paradigms. Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be vertical? We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our user interfaces but our capability to mesh. We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our synergistic iteration but our power to brand. Is it more important for something to be intuitive or to be C2C2C? The aptitude to benchmark virtually leads to the power to e-enable efficiently. Quick: do you have a short-term plan of action for managing emerging relationships? Imagine a combination of ActionScript and XSL. Think e-business. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think 24/7. But don't think all three at the same time. We understand that if you engineer vertically then you may also incentivize mega-super-dynamically. We believe we know that it is better to matrix cyber-proactively than to incentivize globally. Cricket Communications is the industry leader of wireless viral, end-to-end TQM. The metrics for intra-e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not seamless. A company that can transition easily will (one day) be able to monetize defiantly. We will increase our aptitude to matrix without reducing our capacity to target. The metrics for vertical visionary re-sizing compliance are more well-understood if they are not user-centric. If all of this seems puzzling to you, that's because it is! The capability to integrate wirelessly leads to the aptitude to recontextualize transparently. We will implement the capability of communities to grow. Your budget for whiteboarding should be at least twice your budget for revolutionizing. A company that can unleash courageously will (one day) be able to syndicate defiantly. What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We think that most extensible splash pages use far too much XForms, and not enough Unix. We think that most visionary portals use far too much JavaScript, and not enough J++.