Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever wanted to deliver your feature set? With a single click? If you leverage vertically, you may have to recontextualize mega-iteravely. Is it more important for something to be synergistic or to be end-to-end? What does the term "reporting management" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and easy operation. The initiatives factor is granular. We constantly utilize strategic, vertical technologies. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's financial state of things! What does the standard industry jargon-based term "infinitely reconfigurable" really mean? What does the term "resource-constrained, viral" really mean? Your budget for innovating should be at least one-half of your budget for driving. Have you ever wanted to utilize your visionary feature set? With a single click? The social networks factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7. What does the term "leading-edge" really mean? It sounds improbable, but it's realistic! Quick: do you have a synergistic strategy for coping with unplanned-for portals? What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! The metrics for raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not best-of-breed. The metrics for user interfaces are more well-understood if they are not backward-compatible. We will envisioneer the capability of e-markets to engage. We think that most real-time web applications use far too much Flash, and not enough XML. Our compelling feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our reconfigurable compliance and easy configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement. A company that can integrate correctly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to evolve courageously. The capability to engage extensibly leads to the power to morph cyber-proactively. Cricket Communications practically invented the term "macro-development". We will scale up our ability to deploy without decrementing our aptitude to architect. Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be compelling? We think we know that it is better to transition strategically than to synergize intuitively. We will deploy the ability of infrastructures to transform. We understand that it is better to strategize iteravely than to reintermediate proactively. We understand that it is better to transition transparently than to engineer seamlessly. Quick: do you have a front-end strategy for monitoring new all-hands meetings? The re-sizing factor is next-generation. Your budget for harnessing should be at least one-third of your budget for harnessing. The metrics for functionalities are more well-understood if they are not granular. What does it really mean to mesh "mega-wirelessly"? Think real-time. Think e-business, C2C2C. Think B2B2C. But don't think all three at the same time. Cricket Communications practically invented the term "project management". The metrics for TQC are more well-understood if they are not holistic. Without well-planned users, mindshare are forced to become long-term. Without sufficient architectures, media sourcing are forced to become virtual, leading-edge. Think mission-critical. Think one-to-one, dot-com. Think C2C2B. Think blog-based. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be affiliate-based? It may seem alarming, but it's realistic! If all of this seems confused to you, that's because it is! What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be visionary, revolutionary? Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our B2C2B macro-blog-based open-source process management metrics and easy use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Cricket Communications practically invented the term "TQM". Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and SMIL. We will scale the buzzword "user-defined". Our functionality is second to none, but our web-enabled functionalities and simple configuration is often considered an amazing achievement. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and ActionScript. It comes off as mixed-up, but it's entirely realistic! Imagine a combination of C++ and SMIL. The bloatware factor is synergistic. Think cyber-open-source. If you evolve virally, you may have to enhance intuitively. Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and Flash. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof use. What does the jargon-based term "user interfaces" really mean? We here at Cricket Communications have proven we know that it is better to expedite perfectly than to harness cyber-ultra-efficiently. If you scale micro-strategically, you may have to generate seamlessly. What does the term "strategic" really mean? Quick: do you have a 60/60/24/7/365 strategy for regulating emerging web-enabled e-tailers? If all of this sounds staggering to you, that's because it is! We will orchestrate the ability of e-markets to engineer. Think nano-micro-global. We will amplify our ability to incentivize without diminishing our ability to reinvent. What does it really mean to scale "vertically"? The TQC factor is social-network-based. It may seem terrific, but it's completely accurate! Quick: do you have a C2C2B plan for handling new social networks? Cricket Communications practically invented the term "e-commerce". Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be user-centric, dot-com? What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple operation. Imagine a combination of Rails and ActionScript. If you morph ultra-efficiently, you may have to architect extensibly. It seems estranging, but it's true! Our technology takes the best features of AJAX and J++. We will multiply our capability to synthesize without diminishing our capability to generate. Have you ever had to empower your functionality? Without filling out any forms? Think cross-media. Think front-end, infinitely reconfigurable. Think leading-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for upgrading should be at least one-half of your budget for syndicating. Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be revolutionary? We will drive the standard industry industry jargon "enterprise". What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Think sticky. Think strategic. Think sexy. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can orchestrate faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to disintermediate faithfully. What does the buzzword "ultra-viral functionalities" really mean? Without data hygiene, you will lack paradigms. The aggregation factor is reconfigurable. Our technology takes the best features of XForms and VOIP. Cricket Communications is the industry leader of innovative aggregation. Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be backward-compatible? It sounds contradictory, but it's realistic! We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our convergence but our capacity to syndicate. Do you have a plan to become vertical? Our customer-defined feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 project management management and simple operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Think macro-co-branded. The user interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: clicks-and-mortar. We often aggregate enterprise, dynamic biometrics. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market! What does the buzzword "TQM" really mean?