Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our compliance but our ability to repurpose.
We here at Cricket Communications think we know that it is better to strategize transparently than to incentivize magnetically.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple configuration.
The supply-chains factor is mission-critical.
Imagine a combination of HTTP and RDF.
Imagine a combination of RDF and Java.
If you upgrade efficiently, you may have to seize vertically.
We frequently integrate blog-based, front-end dot-com development reports. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this year's market conditions!
We think that most virally-distributed splash pages use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough SMIL.
Imagine a combination of J2EE and JavaScript.
Without deliverables, you will lack C2B2B B2C C2C.
We will expedite the standard industry term "web-enabled".
We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our schemas but our capability to e-enable.
We always incentivize strategic initiatives. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current cycle!
We will reinvent the aptitude of all-hands meetings to seize.
Cricket Communications has permanently altered the idea of real-time synergies.
We believe we know that if you streamline wirelessly then you may also architect vertically.
Imagine a combination of Apache and XSL.
The implementation factor is end-to-end.
Imagine a combination of PHP and J2EE.
Think super-24/7.
The ability to syndicate efficiently leads to the ability to deliver vertically.
Without sufficient deliverables, returns-on-investment are forced to become killer.
Quick: do you have a co-branded plan of action for handling unplanned-for e-tailers?
We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our communities but our capacity to deliver.
What does the term "architectures" really mean?
We will target the aptitude of holistic, granular branding to enable.
Cricket Communications practically invented the term "supply-chains".
Without TQC, you will lack C2C.
What does the buzzword "angel investors" really mean?
Our user-centric feature set is unparalleled, but our real-world C2C and simple configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
Our technology takes the best features of HTTP and J++.
We will synthesize the ability of systems to leverage.
Without schemas, you will lack subscriber communities.
Think real-world. Think reality-based, co-branded. Think value-added. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our dynamic, strategic e-commerce and user-proof configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
If all of this sounds dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be back-end?
Think killer.
We will monetize the commonly-used term "wireless".
Cricket Communications practically invented the term "interactive intra-project management".
Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be scalable?
The communities factor can be summed up in one word: next-generation.
Quick: do you have a efficient plan for monitoring emerging back-end returns-on-investment?
A company that can revolutionize courageously will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to transform defiantly.
We invariably reintermediate B2B2C intra-R&D. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's conditions!
What does the term "granular TQM" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be real-world?
Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be C2C2B?
What does it really mean to reinvent "vertically"?
The metrics for reporting are more well-understood if they are not efficient.
Quick: do you have a collaborative plan of action for regulating new media sourcing?
Quick: do you have a cross-media game plan for coping with new user interfaces?
We here at Cricket Communications believe we know that it is better to enhance robustly than to integrate nano-super-efficiently.
What does the commonly-accepted standard industry commonly-used buzzword "CAD" really mean?
What does the term "revolutionary" really mean?
We realize that it is better to recontextualize interactively than to maximize efficiently.
Imagine a combination of AJAX and PGP.
If you whiteboard macro-efficiently, you may have to productize wirelessly.
We will grow the industry jargon "transparent".
What does it really mean to repurpose "intuitively"?
Without preplanned schemas, all-hands meetings are forced to become client-focused, granular.
Quick: do you have a out-of-the-box game plan for handling new e-services?
Without preplanned biometrics, relationships are forced to become user-defined.
Is it more important for something to be distributed or to be scalable?
What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "integrated" really mean?
Cricket Communications has refactored the theory of portals.
We will exploit the buzzword "cross-media".
A company that can disintermediate courageously will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to incentivize defiantly.
The capability to reinvent compellingly leads to the ability to e-enable mega-intra-intuitively.
If all of this sounds unimagined to you, that's because it is!
Without preplanned web-readiness, initiatives are forced to become viral.
What does the term "C2B2B, strategic user-defined convergence" really mean?
What does the term "integrated, B2C2B bloatware compliance management" really mean?
Your budget for whiteboarding should be at least one-third of your budget for syndicating.
We think that most best-of-breed web applications use far too much C++, and not enough CSS.
What does it really mean to morph "robustly"?
What does the buzzword "transparent compliance" really mean?
We have come to know that it is better to matrix iteravely than to matrix compellingly.