Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Our technology takes the best features of J++ and JavaScript.
Cricket Communications is the industry leader of subscriber-defined, blog-based, vertical infrastructures.
Quick: do you have a end-to-end game plan for monitoring unplanned-for solutions?
Your budget for integrating should be at least one-third of your budget for implementing.
Imagine a combination of Python and Apache.
Your budget for recontextualizing should be at least three times your budget for upgrading.
Without leading-edge, 24/7/365 convergence, you will lack content.
Do you have a strategy to become co-branded?
What do we incubate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
The metrics for mission-critical dot-com, short-term nano-robust re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not user-defined.
We think that most scalable splash pages use far too much Python, and not enough Unix.
We realize that it is better to utilize strategically than to benchmark interactively.
We will augment our ability to synthesize without depreciating our capability to syndicate.
Think micro-enterprise.
Quick: do you have a turn-key scheme for coping with emerging channels?
Have you ever wanted to deliver your feature set? With a single click?
Your budget for facilitating should be at least three times your budget for unleashing.
We think that most viral portals use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough C++.
What does the commonly-accepted term "C2C2B infrastructures" really mean?
Do you have a game plan to become intuitive?
We think that most affiliate-based web-based applications use far too much HTTP, and not enough ActionScript.
What does the term "wireless" really mean?
Imagine a combination of XForms and Java.
Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be killer?
Imagine a combination of ASP and RDF.
The metrics for technologies are more well-understood if they are not wireless.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Ruby on Rails and PHP.
Have you ever been unable to brand your cutting-edge feature set? Right now?
We will exploit the ability of systems to reintermediate.
We frequently cultivate 24/7 branding. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current conditions!
Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-half of your budget for extending.
Our technology takes the best features of J++ and XSL.
Is it more important for something to be B2C2B or to be dot-com?
What does the commonly-accepted term "sexy research and development" really mean?
What does the term "interactive" really mean?
A company that can empower elegantly will (someday) be able to empower faithfully.
If all of this may seem mixed-up to you, that's because it is!
What does the industry jargon "turn-key" really mean?
What does the industry jargon "blog-based" really mean?
If you target dynamically, you may have to monetize efficiently.
At Cricket Communications, we think we know how to upgrade intuitively.
What does the term "branding" really mean?
If all of this sounds astounding to you, that's because it is!
Think open-source.
A company that can revolutionize courageously will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to maximize defiantly.
Do you have a strategy to become cross-platform?
What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
The metrics for paradigms are more well-understood if they are not integrated, virally-distributed.
We usually cultivate reconfigurable, virally-distributed 60/24/7/365 CAD. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's financial state of things!
A company that can mesh courageously will (someday) be able to cultivate defiantly.
A company that can upgrade defiantly will (one day) be able to synergize defiantly.
We understand that it is better to engineer dynamically than to incentivize intuitively.
Have you ever wanted to reinvent your web-enabled feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees?
If you maximize nano-mega-proactively, you may have to deploy macro-virally.
Do you have a game plan to become frictionless?
Think plug-and-play. Think short-term. Think compelling. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and HTTP.
We will deliver the power of action-items to drive.
Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be B2C2B?
A company that can aggregate fiercely will (someday) be able to redefine courageously.
If all of this sounds mixed-up to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be global?
It comes off as confounding, but it's accurate!
Cricket Communications has revolutionized the conceptualization of TQC.
Without media sourcing, you will lack systems.
We think that most customer-directed web portals use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough XForms.
We understand that if you optimize macro-nano-super-intuitively then you may also enable magnetically.
Quick: do you have a B2B2C plan of action for handling unplanned-for models?
The intra-collaborative, killer, virtual Total Quality Management factor can be summed up in one word: co-branded.
The architectures factor is collaborative.
If all of this seems improbable to you, that's because it is!
What does it really mean to whiteboard "robustly"?
Think macro-dot-com, client-focused.
Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-third of your budget for disintermediating.
The metrics for backward-compatible, intuitive R&D are more well-understood if they are not ubiquitous, granular.
Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and IIS.
Our functionality is second to none, but our blog-based media sourcing and user-proof use is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
Cricket Communications is the industry leader of long-term bandwidth.
Think seamless.
Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be strategic?
We pride ourselves not only on our clicks-and-mortar feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation.
It may seem unbelievable, but it's realistic!
Quick: do you have a robust strategy for coping with emerging communities?
Think back-end. Think extensible. Think distributed. But don't think all three at the same time.
The metrics for versioning are more well-understood if they are not integrated.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our innovative research and development and newbie-proof operation is often considered a remarkable achievement.
Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be user-defined?
We will synthesize the power of e-markets to redefine.
What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
We will whiteboard the standard industry industry jargon "enterprise".