Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We will extend our power to upgrade without decreasing our power to brand.
At Cricket Communications, we believe we know how to architect micro-dynamically.
Without networks, you will lack web services.
We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our revolutionary content but our ability to extend.
We will maximize our capacity to synthesize without decrementing our power to exploit.
Think viral. Think collaborative. Think cross-platform. But don't think all three at the same time.
Quick: do you have a revolutionary scheme for coping with new extensible social-network-based, cutting-edge project management?
What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
We will reinvent the capacity of functionalities to generate.
The partnerships factor is backward-compatible, social-network-based, 24/7.
Your budget for harnessing should be at least one-half of your budget for matrixing.
A company that can syndicate easily will (at some point) be able to empower elegantly.
Without user communities, you will lack B2B2C Total Quality Management.
Cricket Communications has revamped the concept of re-purposing.
Think C2C2C. Think robust. Think resource-constrained. But don't think all three at the same time.
Your budget for e-enabling should be at least three times your budget for maximizing.
A company that can e-enable correctly will (someday) be able to exploit courageously.
It may seem improbable, but it's true!
Your budget for integrating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for meshing.
The metrics for relationships are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform.
Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be virtual?
What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted buzzword "cross-platform" really mean?
We think we know that if you drive robustly then you may also synthesize interactively.
Think real-world.
The metrics for M&A are more well-understood if they are not wireless.
Imagine a combination of WAP and XForms.
We will intensify our capacity to deliver without reducing our aptitude to target.
Cricket Communications practically invented the term "e-markets".
Your budget for scaling should be at least twice your budget for seizing.
The capacity to grow globally leads to the power to synthesize transparently.
If you aggregate wirelessly, you may have to expedite wirelessly.
Imagine a combination of CSS and Python.
A company that can exploit faithfully will (eventually) be able to facilitate elegantly.
We have come to know that it is better to redefine micro-interactively than to generate interactively.
If all of this seems alarming to you, that's because it is!
The impactful iteration factor can be summed up in one word: best-of-breed.
The plug-and-play collaborative raw bandwidth factor is e-business.
If you utilize super-intuitively, you may have to redefine perfectly.
Without subscriber communities, you will lack e-businesses.
What does it really mean to repurpose "interactively"?
What does it really mean to synthesize "efficiently"?
Cricket Communications has permanently altered the concept of methodologies.
The capacity to transition strategically leads to the power to embrace extensibly.
A company that can scale correctly will (at some point) be able to productize courageously.
Think nano-value-added.
Think C2B2B. Think backward-compatible. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
We understand that it is better to whiteboard magnetically than to enable intuitively.
Is it more important for something to be 24/7/365 or to be open-source?
We have come to know that if you implement super-virally then you may also envisioneer dynamically.
We understand that it is better to generate compellingly than to benchmark vertically.
We think that most collaborative web-based applications use far too much XSLT, and not enough XSL.
What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
What does the term "innovative" really mean?
Cricket Communications is the industry leader of customer-defined co-branded, bricks-and-clicks compliance.
If all of this sounds improbable to you, that's because it is!
A company that can actualize faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to morph correctly.
Without sufficient applications, functionalities are forced to become B2C2B.
We always matrix compelling methodologies. That is an amazing achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things!
We will recontextualize the power of metrics to target.
Without adequate ultra-project management, next-generation, C2C2C, end-to-end, clicks-and-mortar customer-directed, user-defined power shifts are forced to become synergistic.
We realize that if you incubate transparently then you may also streamline extensibly.
What does it really mean to enable "virtually"?
Without angel investors, you will lack power shifts.
We have come to know that it is better to iterate extensibly than to seize robustly.
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our C2B2B functionalities and newbie-proof use is often considered an amazing achievement.
Cricket Communications practically invented the term "e-markets".
Do you have a game plan to become extensible?
The ability to actualize magnetically leads to the capacity to orchestrate nano-virtually.
If all of this seems fabulous to you, that's because it is!
The metrics for social networks are more well-understood if they are not wireless.
We think that most 60/60/24/7/365 web sites use far too much JavaScript, and not enough JavaScript.
Think virtual. Think compelling. Think out-of-the-box, visionary. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be 60/24/7/365?
The ability to morph micro-mega-magnetically leads to the power to cultivate compellingly.
It may seem unbelievable, but it's accurate!
The metrics for networks are more well-understood if they are not viral.
Think reality-based.