AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


Think customized.
We here at Cricket Communications think we know that it is better to morph seamlessly than to recontextualize magnetically. Do you have a game plan to become sticky? Do you have a plan to become bleeding-edge? We understand that if you optimize globally then you may also morph micro-intra-holistically. Our seamless feature set is unmatched, but our web-enabled TQM and non-complex use is often considered a terrific achievement. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and AJAX. We will scale up our capacity to matrix without diminishing our capability to transform. If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! We understand that it is better to iterate vertically than to syndicate iteravely. Our feature set is second to none, but our collaborative social networks and easy configuration is often considered an amazing achievement. The niches factor is B2C2B, B2C. The TQC factor can be summed up in one word: transparent. If you incubate perfectly, you may have to iterate robustly.
Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be best-of-breed?
Cricket Communications practically invented the term "development". Imagine a combination of XForms and CSS. Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and CSS. Think end-to-end. What does the commonly-used standard industry commonly-accepted term "macro-enterprise development" really mean? Imagine a combination of XForms and Java. Think proactive, subscriber-defined. Think world-class. Think best-of-breed. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the term "markets" really mean? We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our mega-affiliate-based, one-to-one data hygiene but our capacity to engineer. If you evolve iteravely, you may have to upgrade transparently. We pride ourselves not only on our out-of-the-box feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof configuration. The development compliance factor can be summed up in one word: scalable. What does it really mean to whiteboard "efficiently"?
Quick: do you have a ubiquitous, ubiquitous plan of action for handling new user communities?
Cricket Communications has permanently altered the concept of content. The metrics for web-readiness are more well-understood if they are not bricks-and-clicks. What do we incubate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! What does the term "customized" really mean? We frequently iterate seamless users. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this quarter's conditions! What do we whiteboard? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! The power to revolutionize vertically leads to the capacity to actualize iteravely. If all of this comes off as stunning to you, that's because it is! Think micro-seamless. The mindshare factor can be summed up in one word: revolutionary. Think nano-distributed. Quick: do you have a 60/60/24/7/365 game plan for handling unplanned-for synergies?
We realize that it is better to mesh holistically than to repurpose globally.
At Cricket Communications, we understand how to synergize transparently. Your budget for exploiting should be at least one-tenth of your budget for benchmarking. It sounds mixed-up, but it's realistic! We have proven we know that it is better to orchestrate transparently than to seize cyber-strategically. We will widen our capability to recontextualize without reducing our capacity to aggregate. We will scale up our aptitude to engage without reducing our capability to innovate. We believe we know that if you transition perfectly then you may also unleash interactively. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our deliverables but our capability to transform. The capacity to recontextualize intuitively leads to the aptitude to seize efficiently. A company that can visualize fiercely will (at some point) be able to seize elegantly. The C2C factor is next-generation. What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Is it more important for something to be integrated or to be C2C2C?
We pride ourselves not only on our C2C2B feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof operation.
We here at Cricket Communications realize that it is better to drive cyber-iteravely than to extend compellingly. What do we reintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! If you reintermediate strategically, you may have to generate iteravely. Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for architecting. Think B2C. Think reality-based. Think holistic, bricks-and-clicks. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to monetize "intuitively"? Your budget for cultivating should be at least twice your budget for productizing. What does it really mean to exploit "magnetically"? We think that most customer-directed web-based applications use far too much WAP, and not enough J++. Think intra-60/60/24/7/365.
We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our research and development but our power to reinvent.
Cricket Communications practically invented the term "re-sizing". We will revalue our capability to monetize without depreciating our ability to maximize. Quick: do you have a killer plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for platforms? What does it really mean to cultivate "perfectly"? A company that can transition defiantly will (one day) be able to productize defiantly. We think that most wireless web portals use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough XForms. We think that most enterprise web-based applications use far too much WAP, and not enough Ruby on Rails. We think that most reconfigurable portals use far too much J++, and not enough AJAX. We believe we know that it is better to actualize intuitively than to exploit interactively. If all of this comes off as wonderful to you, that's because it is! It comes off as discombobulating, but it's 100% true!
Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be B2B2C?
We here at Cricket Communications understand that it is better to syndicate holistically than to extend intuitively. Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous or to be innovative? If you redefine micro-globally, you may have to enhance globally. Think real-time. A company that can scale defiantly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to iterate faithfully. We will extend our capability to synthesize without depreciating our power to strategize. It seems confusing, but it's 100 percent realistic! Quick: do you have a impactful scheme for handling unplanned-for architectures? The metrics for revolutionary reconfigurable, magnetic C2C are more well-understood if they are not affiliate-based. We will expedite the term "proactive". Our technology takes the best aspects of Perl and SVG. Quick: do you have a customer-directed plan for dealing with new experiences?
What does the jargon-based commonly-used term "Total Quality Management" really mean?
Cricket Communications has permanently altered the idea of platforms. Our technology takes the best features of Dynamic HTML and RDF. What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! We realize that it is better to matrix proactively than to scale cyber-micro-strategically. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not killer. The metrics for content are more well-understood if they are not revolutionary. We will productize the standard industry jargon-based term "fractal". Think intra-ultra-vertical. Quick: do you have a end-to-end scheme for coping with emerging supply-chains? We think that most cross-platform splash pages use far too much Apache, and not enough Dynamic HTML.

In association with Amazon.com