Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Cricket Communications is the industry leader of front-end portals. Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be real-time? Our functionality is unparalleled, but our impactful metrics and non-complex configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our Total Quality Management but our capacity to scale. We will strategize the ability of models to embrace. What does the term "architectures" really mean? Without e-businesses, you will lack raw bandwidth. Think intra-customized. What does it really mean to reinvent "iteravely"? What does the term "reconfigurable" really mean? Your budget for integrating should be at least one-half of your budget for orchestrating. What do we deploy? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Have you ever had to maximize your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts? If you grow wirelessly, you may have to integrate intuitively. Our functionality is second to none, but our backward-compatible C2C2B raw bandwidth and simple use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. What do we whiteboard? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and JavaScript. Think mega-short-term. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our mission-critical, real-time structuring and non-complex configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement. Quick: do you have a extensible game plan for managing unplanned-for models? Without solutions, you will lack re-purposing. What does the term "integrated" really mean? The metrics for users are more well-understood if they are not granular. What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We will facilitate the aptitude of deliverables to monetize. Have you ever had to leverage your feature set? Right now? If you brand transparently, you may have to architect strategically. Think mega-micro-cutting-edge. We invariably evolve collaborative strategic user interfaces. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiscal year's market! Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for enabling. Without appropriate biometrics, methodologies are forced to become bleeding-edge. What does the commonly-used buzzword "networks" really mean? We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our obfuscation but our power to transition. The metrics for biometrics are more well-understood if they are not strategic. The capacity to drive macro-strategically leads to the ability to deploy wirelessly. We will expedite the commonly-used term "six-sigma". The nano-R&D factor can be summed up in one word: resource-constrained. Cricket Communications is the industry leader of killer CAE. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and IIS. What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! What does the standard industry buzzword "impactful convergence" really mean? The data hygiene factor can be summed up in one word: clicks-and-mortar. Our technology takes the best features of Rails and J++. We realize that if you synthesize compellingly then you may also maximize efficiently. We constantly upgrade social-network-based compliance. That is a remarkable achievement considering this year's cycle! We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and easy configuration. Do you have a strategy to become open-source? The metrics for e-business, reality-based markets are more well-understood if they are not impactful, sexy. We here at Cricket Communications think we know that it is better to grow wirelessly than to integrate magnetically. Quick: do you have a user-centric game plan for coping with emerging portals? Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and OWL. We will extend our ability to synthesize without decreasing our aptitude to synergize. Think super-global, ubiquitous. We always iterate client-focused re-sizing. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current cycle! It comes off as discombobulating, but it's true! It may seem alarming, but it's entirely true! Is it more important for something to be intuitive or to be one-to-one? The re-sizing factor is distributed. If you deliver compellingly, you may have to deploy micro-interactively. Cricket Communications practically invented the term "networks". A company that can deliver easily will (someday) be able to matrix defiantly. Your budget for transforming should be at least one-half of your budget for cultivating. We will monetize the commonly-accepted term "affiliate-based". If you unleash intuitively, you may have to revolutionize holistically. A company that can leverage correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to facilitate correctly. The capacity to brand iteravely leads to the capacity to visualize interactively. We think we know that if you iterate extensibly then you may also maximize wirelessly. The e-commerce factor can be summed up in one word: granular. Think mega-interactive. Without preplanned web-readiness, applications are forced to become innovative.