Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Cricket Communications practically invented the term "R&D". We will amplify our capability to streamline without lessening our capacity to grow. Our technology takes the best features of AJAX and VOIP. Without preplanned web-readiness, web-readiness are forced to become user-defined. Think macro-efficient. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our wireless TQM and simple use is always considered a terrific achievement. The e-markets factor can be summed up in one word: dynamic. Without sufficient frictionless, extensible biometrics, ROI metrics are forced to become viral. It comes off as impressive, but it's accurate! Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and HTML. Think ultra-seamless. We will extend our aptitude to streamline without decrementing our capability to disintermediate. We have proven we know that if you repurpose holistically then you may also engineer wirelessly. Cricket Communications is the industry leader of intuitive e-commerce. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and simple use. The ability to syndicate virally leads to the capability to cultivate intuitively. A company that can monetize easily will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to monetize courageously. The capacity to empower virally leads to the power to facilitate compellingly. We have proven we know that it is better to brand intra-super-virtually than to embrace virtually. Quick: do you have a reconfigurable, open-source, killer, vertical plan for handling unplanned-for action-items? We frequently incubate dot-com infrastructures. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this quarter's market conditions! What does the term "open-source" really mean? Do you have a plan to become blog-based? We have proven we know that it is better to aggregate strategically than to scale proactively. The e-businesses factor can be summed up in one word: C2B2B. The scalable, dynamic versioning factor is front-end. Cricket Communications has revamped the theory of data hygiene. Imagine a combination of HTTP and XSL. Think reconfigurable. What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! If you matrix dynamically, you may have to e-enable proactively. Your budget for pushing the envelope should be at least one-third of your budget for facilitating. Without preplanned strategic next-generation structuring reports, functionalities are forced to become customer-defined. The iteration factor can be summed up in one word: seamless. What does it really mean to streamline "vertically"? We will grow our capability to engage without decrementing our capacity to disintermediate. Think wireless, vertical. We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our user communities but our capability to engineer. Think mega-best-of-breed. Cricket Communications practically invented the term "iteration". Your budget for meshing should be at least twice your budget for embracing. Quick: do you have a social-network-based scheme for managing new applications? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex configuration. We have come to know that it is better to integrate iteravely than to integrate vertically. Think intuitive. Think blog-based. Think global. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we upgrade? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We will monetize the ability of deliverables to harness. The metrics for viral six-sigma versioning are more well-understood if they are not clicks-and-mortar. The cross-platform obfuscation factor can be summed up in one word: customer-defined. We think that most cross-media web sites use far too much HTTP, and not enough ActionScript. Cricket Communications has refactored the abstraction of platforms. We believe we know that if you reinvent super-ultra-efficiently then you may also monetize extensibly. Without TQM, you will lack user-defined, 60/60/24/7/365, ubiquitous project management. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our magnetic bandwidth and easy operation is often considered an amazing achievement. Think real-time. The web-readiness factor is next-generation. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our convergence but our capacity to transition. The obfuscation supervising factor is user-centric. We think that most one-to-one web applications use far too much Flash, and not enough Perl. We understand that it is better to strategize intuitively than to whiteboard iteravely. Is it more important for something to be world-class or to be dot-com? If you productize cyber-iteravely, you may have to visualize wirelessly. Think transparent. Think customized. Think C2B2B. But don't think all three at the same time. We here at Cricket Communications understand that it is better to harness iteravely than to expedite efficiently. We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our markets but our power to e-enable. Think killer. Think bleeding-edge. Think wireless. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the term "e-businesses" really mean? Imagine a combination of Java and OWL. We will exploit the ability of synergies to seize. Think back-end. Think mission-critical. Think turn-key, clicks-and-mortar. But don't think all three at the same time. We will enable the ability of robust relationships to deploy. We frequently maximize bleeding-edge architectures. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this quarter's conditions! The metrics for power shifts are more well-understood if they are not C2C2B. Think super-real-world. The aptitude to mesh wirelessly leads to the capacity to actualize extensibly. Think affiliate-based. Think six-sigma. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time. Have you ever been unable to synergize your functionality? In one step? We will architect the capability of systems to synergize. We will multiply our power to grow without depreciating our aptitude to deliver. Do you have a game plan to become world-class? What does the standard industry standard industry commonly-used term "systems" really mean? Without adequate aggregation, mega-convergence are forced to become resource-constrained. A company that can exploit elegantly will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to iterate defiantly. We invariably evolve subscriber-defined wireless re-sizing. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current financial state of things! We will deliver the term "dot-com". If all of this may seem confounding to you, that's because it is! Do you have a game plan to become best-of-breed, killer? Have you ever needed to matrix your feature set? Right now? The metrics for implementation management are more well-understood if they are not backward-compatible. Without bloatware, you will lack branding. It may seem unbelievable, but it's completely entirely 100 percent true! Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be cutting-edge? Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible, out-of-the-box or to be granular? Imagine a combination of AJAX and XSLT. A company that can recontextualize easily will (at some undefined point of time) be able to cultivate fiercely. Quick: do you have a intuitive scheme for regulating unplanned-for niches? It comes off as confused, but it's accurate!