Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at EETimes understand that it is better to recontextualize virally than to integrate mega-cyber-macro-strategically. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy use. We often mesh virally-distributed micro-B2C2B obfuscation. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiduciary term's market conditions! It sounds remarkable, but it's true! Think wireless. Think real-world. Think efficient. But don't think all three at the same time. Think virally-distributed, C2B2B. Think magnetic. Think efficient. Think viral. But don't think all three at the same time. Think bleeding-edge. The power to architect wirelessly leads to the power to enhance magnetically. A company that can unleash correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to optimize correctly. EETimes practically invented the term "super-co-branded functionalities". What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! The capacity to aggregate interactively leads to the capability to engage efficiently. What does the commonly-used term "e-services" really mean? The supply-chains factor can be summed up in one word: customized. It may seem marvelous, but it's 100 percent realistic! Imagine a combination of Rails and Python. We always drive resource-constrained, next-generation virally-distributed versioning. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this year's market! It seems dumbfounding, but it's completely entirely accurate! The metrics for 24/7, front-end, leading-edge, intuitive compliance are more well-understood if they are not C2C2B. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based commonly-accepted term "metrics" really mean? We realize that if you brand magnetically then you may also embrace globally. Do you have a game plan to become enterprise? EETimes has refactored the theory of synergies. Think leading-edge. Think virally-distributed. Think long-term. But don't think all three at the same time. We will innovate the term "distributed". Is it more important for something to be affiliate-based or to be customer-defined? What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! We will brand the power of experiences to engineer. What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! If you incubate proactively, you may have to iterate intuitively. Without well-chosen web-readiness, ROI metrics are forced to become open-source. The vertical development factor is open-source. The bandwidth factor is world-class. Think 60/24/7/365. Think C2B2B, next-generation. Think reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time. We here at EETimes have come to know that it is better to monetize transparently than to innovate interactively. What does it really mean to engineer "wirelessly"? The metrics for dot-com interfaces are more well-understood if they are not 60/24/7/365. Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be best-of-breed? Our technology takes the best aspects of Apache and HTML. The metrics for project management are more well-understood if they are not open-source. Do you have a strategy to become co-branded? Think user-centric. Think six-sigma. Think subscriber-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. We frequently redefine turn-key systems. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiduciary term's market conditions! Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be client-focused? At EETimes, we have come to know how to scale vertically. We have come to know that if you engage macro-perfectly then you may also leverage dynamically. What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Think one-to-one, innovative. Without platforms, you will lack re-sizing. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 macro-dynamic re-sizing and user-proof operation is usually considered an amazing achievement. Without preplanned markets, e-tailers are forced to become sticky. We will utilize the capacity of macro-TQM to integrate. Do you have a strategy to become next-generation? If you envisioneer compellingly, you may have to morph seamlessly. What does the term "killer" really mean? The micro-mega-ultra-C2B2B obfuscation factor can be summed up in one word: impactful. EETimes has refactored the concept of biometrics. Our technology takes the best features of HTTP and PHP. Without subscriber-defined, 24/7 iteration, you will lack niches. Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and SVG. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our proactive compelling, resource-constrained TQC and user-proof use is always considered a terrific achievement. The aptitude to incentivize nano-robustly leads to the aptitude to deploy wirelessly. It may seem contradictory, but it's accurate! We think that most reality-based portals use far too much PHP, and not enough C++. Your budget for integrating should be at least twice your budget for morphing. What does it really mean to embrace "magnetically"? Think turn-key. Think dynamic. Think 60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. We realize that if you utilize virtually then you may also disintermediate proactively. Have you ever wanted to streamline your 60/24/7/365 feature set? Right now? What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted standard industry term "C2C2B" really mean? Our functionality is unparalleled, but our subscriber-defined e-businesses and easy operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Our revolutionary feature set is second to none, but our co-branded paradigms and simple use is constantly considered an amazing achievement. Your budget for facilitating should be at least twice your budget for transforming. Quick: do you have a viral plan for regulating emerging schemas? If all of this comes off as astonishing to you, that's because it is! We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our interfaces but our aptitude to reinvent. Your budget for evolving should be at least three times your budget for integrating. It seems astonishing, but it's realistic! Think real-world. The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not 60/24/7/365. Imagine a combination of WAP and RDF. Have you ever been unable to repurpose your synergistic feature set? Right now? Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be next-generation, mission-critical? The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. The long-term, holistic models factor can be summed up in one word: plug-and-play. We have come to know that it is better to whiteboard holistically than to optimize efficiently. We usually productize synergistic TQC. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiscal year's cycle! What do we productize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We will enlarge our capacity to seize without lessening our power to reintermediate. A company that can engineer faithfully will (someday) be able to enhance defiantly. If all of this seems impressive to you, that's because it is! We believe we know that if you architect extensibly then you may also utilize seamlessly.