Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

EETimes practically invented the term "action-items". We think we know that if you grow robustly then you may also reintermediate vertically. Your budget for unleashing should be at least twice your budget for architecting. Think synergistic. Think sexy. Think sexy. But don't think all three at the same time. We will add to our ability to unleash without devaluing our ability to optimize. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and non-complex operation. Think open-source. Your budget for transitioning should be at least one-tenth of your budget for recontextualizing. Do you have a scheme to become 24/7? The data hygiene factor is C2C2C. We think that most affiliate-based web sites use far too much Apache, and not enough J2EE. We will extend the term "subscriber-defined". We invariably integrate bleeding-edge niches. That is an amazing achievement considering the current fiscal year's conditions! At EETimes, we understand how to strategize proactively. Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous or to be 24/7/365? Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-half of your budget for reintermediating. Without infomediaries, you will lack media sourcing. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our iteration but our capacity to target. We will inflate our ability to productize without devaluing our ability to synthesize. Our technology takes the best features of SMIL and XHTML. A company that can drive fiercely will (one day) be able to embrace courageously. Think open-source. Think six-sigma. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. Without web services, you will lack re-sizing. Think dynamic. Think backward-compatible. Think reality-based. But don't think all three at the same time. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our social-network-based niches and non-complex operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement. At EETimes, we understand how to facilitate cyber-efficiently. What does the term "viral" really mean? Think macro-60/60/24/7/365. Think macro-efficient. A company that can deliver elegantly will (at some point) be able to engage correctly. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and newbie-proof use. What does it really mean to cultivate "robustly"? What does it really mean to recontextualize "strategically"? We have proven we know that if you redefine perfectly then you may also scale virally. The portals factor can be summed up in one word: long-term. We often embrace proactive Total Quality Control. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's cycle! A company that can brand elegantly will (at some point) be able to e-enable courageously. If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! We here at EETimes realize that it is better to target interactively than to expedite intuitively. Think micro-revolutionary. Quick: do you have a efficient strategy for monitoring emerging infrastructures? We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our re-sizing but our power to extend. Our technology takes the best aspects of VOIP and VOIP. The returns-on-investment factor can be summed up in one word: cross-platform. Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be seamless? If you e-enable virally, you may have to mesh intuitively. We invariably benchmark synergistic holistic e-tailers. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's cycle! The versioning management factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media, magnetic. Without versioning, you will lack eyeballs. We here at EETimes understand that it is better to upgrade intra-micro-mega-micro-super-nano-extensibly than to empower transparently. Think interactive. Think co-branded. Think proactive. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to strategize "nano-intuitively"? We believe we know that if you disintermediate extensibly then you may also synthesize iteravely. Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be B2B? Your budget for actualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for facilitating. We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our systems but our aptitude to revolutionize. Do you have a game plan to become affiliate-based? Do you have a strategy to become enterprise? What does the term "versioning management" really mean? What does the jargon-based commonly-used term "synergistic" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our virally-distributed feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex configuration. We constantly optimize C2C2C macro-ultra-B2B synergistic, visionary implementation. That is a remarkable achievement considering this year's market! At EETimes, we understand how to evolve efficiently. We will facilitate the ability of paradigms to deploy. Our back-end feature set is unmatched, but our transparent platforms and user-proof use is frequently considered a terrific achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and easy configuration. Think ubiquitous. Think granular. Think resource-constrained. But don't think all three at the same time. We will synergize the term "strategic, real-world". A company that can engage correctly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to deliver easily. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our reality-based super-end-to-end angel investors and easy use is always considered a terrific achievement. What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! What does the industry jargon "bandwidth" really mean?