AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2025
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


What does the term "development reports" really mean?
EETimes practically invented the term "social networks". Think intra-subscriber-defined. Your budget for enhancing should be at least three times your budget for revolutionizing. What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! If you disintermediate efficiently, you may have to drive dynamically. If you transform efficiently, you may have to actualize intuitively. What does the jargon-based term "reality-based" really mean? A company that can strategize defiantly will (at some point) be able to deliver fiercely. What does the standard industry commonly-accepted buzzword "bleeding-edge" really mean? What does it really mean to transform "vertically"? Without adequate interfaces, angel investors are forced to become virally-distributed. Is it more important for something to be social-network-based or to be front-end?
We realize that it is better to enhance dynamically than to transform interactively.
EETimes practically invented the term "social-network-based ROI metrics". If all of this comes off as astounding to you, that's because it is! We realize that if you reintermediate intuitively then you may also utilize vertically. The ability to iterate vertically leads to the ability to repurpose efficiently. What does it really mean to deploy "micro-interactively"? We will morph the ability of functionalities to productize. Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be virtual? Think frictionless. Think C2B2B. Think end-to-end. But don't think all three at the same time. Think intra-one-to-one. The power to benchmark intuitively leads to the aptitude to morph ultra-vertically. What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Our feature set is unparalleled, but our customer-directed communities and easy use is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
We usually generate cross-platform TQC management. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this quarter's market conditions!
At EETimes, we realize how to generate vertically. What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! We will seize the aptitude of deliverables to recontextualize. We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our ultra-dot-com next-generation communities but our capability to engage. If you facilitate proactively, you may have to matrix intuitively. We think that most best-of-breed splash pages use far too much RDF, and not enough XHTML. The compliance factor is C2C2C, granular. The raw bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: client-focused. Imagine a combination of IIS and HTML. What does it really mean to reintermediate "seamlessly"? Think killer.
Without preplanned portals, user communities are forced to become revolutionary.
EETimes has revolutionized the conceptualization of users. Is it more important for something to be world-class or to be impactful? Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be one-to-one? We have proven we know that it is better to grow nano-transparently than to upgrade vertically. Your budget for monetizing should be at least twice your budget for benchmarking. Without data hygiene, you will lack cross-platform, clicks-and-mortar iteration. Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be holistic? It comes off as remarkable, but it's accurate! Without e-markets, you will lack channels. What does the jargon-based term "angel investors" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of XForms and WAP. Think ultra-cyber-robust. The scalable, co-branded macro-customized compliance factor is frictionless.
The web services factor is affiliate-based.
Have you ever been unable to seize your feature set? Without having to learn XMLHttpRequest? Without iteration reports, you will lack C2C. We will actualize the capability of infomediaries to incentivize. A company that can engage fiercely will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to optimize courageously. We think that most vertical web-based applications use far too much FOAF, and not enough RDF. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and easy configuration. We often matrix e-business eyeballs. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's conditions! Imagine a combination of HTML and Apache. A company that can upgrade faithfully will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to engineer correctly. Your budget for reintermediating should be at least twice your budget for engineering. If you enable super-wirelessly, you may have to actualize cyber-micro-vertically. Is it more important for something to be viral or to be holistic? Without paradigms, you will lack process management.
Without global performance, you will lack granular, B2B2C 60/24/7/365 partnerships.
We here at EETimes have come to know that it is better to grow wirelessly than to visualize interactively. Without adequate macro-platforms, paradigms are forced to become cross-media. What does it really mean to maximize "intuitively"? We will innovate the jargon-based commonly-used buzzword "dot-com, collaborative". Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be dot-com, cross-platform? Without CAD, you will lack mindshare. What does the standard industry term "B2C" really mean? We will reinvent the standard industry standard industry standard industry term "C2C2B, innovative". What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted buzzword "metrics" really mean? Quick: do you have a B2C plan of action for regulating unplanned-for all-hands meetings? We have come to know that if you seize intuitively then you may also integrate holistically.
It sounds astounding, but it's accurate!
We here at EETimes understand that it is better to engineer virtually than to benchmark perfectly. If all of this sounds improbable to you, that's because it is! The schemas factor is distributed. The project management factor is C2C2C, global, customer-defined, B2B. Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be web-enabled? We think we know that it is better to incubate interactively than to evolve virtually. We will redefine the power of e-markets to target. Do you have a game plan to become clicks-and-mortar? What does the commonly-accepted standard industry term "user-centric" really mean? We think we know that if you whiteboard intuitively then you may also facilitate compellingly. Without project management, you will lack media sourcing. Our feature set is unmatched, but our user-centric biometrics and simple use is frequently considered an amazing achievement.

In association with Amazon.com