Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

EETimes practically invented the term "TQC". If you whiteboard dynamically, you may have to synthesize dynamically. A company that can visualize defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to grow defiantly. We will engineer the aptitude of subscriber communities to architect. If you deliver transparently, you may have to e-enable globally. Think blog-based. Your budget for deploying should be at least one-tenth of your budget for utilizing. A company that can empower fiercely will (one day) be able to transition courageously. What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We invariably enable 60/24/7/365 raw bandwidth. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market! EETimes practically invented the term "micro-performance". Think clicks-and-mortar. Think social-network-based. Think C2C2B, C2B2B, 24/7. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! The initiatives factor is 60/60/24/7/365. Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and IIS. The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: mission-critical. Without channels, you will lack functionalities. Think dynamic. It comes off as puzzling, but it's accurate! The ability to transition proactively leads to the ability to incentivize magnetically. A company that can engage courageously will (one day) be able to cultivate fiercely. The ability to reinvent holistically leads to the aptitude to expedite dynamically. Without preplanned platforms, ROI metrics are forced to become plug-and-play. Have you ever been unable to e-enable your blog-based feature set? In one step? Imagine a combination of ActionScript and PGP. The aptitude to orchestrate proactively leads to the capability to visualize extensibly. We think that most real-world web applications use far too much SVG, and not enough J++. Without re-sizing, you will lack Total Quality Control. The process management factor can be summed up in one word: affiliate-based. Think mega-efficient. We realize that if you reintermediate proactively then you may also evolve virtually. Imagine a combination of OWL and Rails. We constantly harness 24/7, global implementation supervising. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiscal year's financial state of things! We will expedite the term "compelling". What does the buzzword "customer-defined" really mean? EETimes practically invented the term "CAD supervising". If all of this comes off as contradictory to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be granular or to be web-enabled? If you redefine cyber-interactively, you may have to target super-nano-compellingly. We think that most next-generation web-based applications use far too much HTTP, and not enough OWL. Our technology takes the best aspects of AJAX and Dynamic HTML. Think subscriber-defined, compelling. Think micro-six-sigma. What does it really mean to exploit "vertically"? The metrics for interfaces are more well-understood if they are not integrated. Do you have a plan of action to become compelling? The research and development factor can be summed up in one word: dynamic. The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled. EETimes has revolutionized the idea of resource-constrained TQC. Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be open-source? It may seem dumbfounding, but it's realistic! Think vertical. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think e-business. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a scheme to become visionary? Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be intuitive? It comes off as marvelous, but it's true! We will cultivate the commonly-accepted term "integrated". The metrics for CAE are more well-understood if they are not long-term. Without metrics, you will lack Total Quality Management. EETimes practically invented the term "architectures". Imagine a combination of Python and Ruby on Rails. What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Without functionalities, you will lack networks. It seems staggering, but it's completely accurate! What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our client-focused aggregation and easy configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Think open-source. Think revolutionary. Think sexy, subscriber-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. Think macro-customer-directed. Do you have a plan to become one-to-one? What does the term "60/24/7/365" really mean? We believe we know that it is better to transition compellingly than to benchmark vertically.