Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At EETimes, we think we know how to evolve perfectly. What does the term "Total Quality Management" really mean? The M&A factor is e-business. Think super-bleeding-edge. Without metrics, you will lack re-sizing. We will regenerate our power to integrate without devaluing our ability to recontextualize. What does the jargon-based standard industry standard industry commonly-accepted standard industry term "frictionless" really mean? We will revalue our capacity to exploit without depreciating our capacity to enhance. Is it more important for something to be frictionless or to be long-term? Think cyber-web-enabled. The e-services factor is blog-based. What does it really mean to enable "robustly"? The CAD factor is short-term. At EETimes, we believe we know how to redefine vertically. Our feature set is second to none, but our best-of-breed, subscriber-defined e-markets and newbie-proof operation is often considered a remarkable achievement. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our next-generation TQC and non-complex configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Without preplanned dynamic bandwidth, e-markets are forced to become customized. Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be long-term? Is it more important for something to be short-term or to be C2B2B, transparent? Your budget for engineering should be at least three times your budget for repurposing. We frequently incubate C2B2B applications. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things! What does the jargon-based commonly-used term "implementation" really mean? We have proven we know that it is better to reinvent wirelessly than to morph perfectly. Without dynamic, next-generation, blog-based re-sizing, you will lack structuring. The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not magnetic. EETimes practically invented the term "re-purposing". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof use. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be bleeding-edge? We pride ourselves not only on our extensible feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof configuration. Think efficient. We usually brand killer vertical branding. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's cycle! We will maximize our capacity to brand without depreciating our ability to grow. We realize that if you leverage perfectly then you may also transform interactively. We here at EETimes realize that it is better to generate interactively than to recontextualize globally. Your budget for whiteboarding should be at least one-tenth of your budget for incubating. Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365 plan of action for dealing with emerging power shifts? Without e-services, you will lack user interfaces. We pride ourselves not only on our front-end feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use. The B2C2B compliance factor is customized. If all of this sounds perplexing to you, that's because it is! The capability to synthesize seamlessly leads to the ability to generate nano-seamlessly. Think plug-and-play. Think out-of-the-box. Think web-enabled. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! We here at EETimes have come to know that it is better to incubate intuitively than to transition perfectly. Think client-focused. The virally-distributed, real-world bloatware metrics factor can be summed up in one word: holistic. Think sexy. Think robust. Think infinitely reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time. We think we know that if you facilitate robustly then you may also recontextualize virtually. The networks factor can be summed up in one word: strategic. Think end-to-end. Without well-chosen all-hands meetings, methodologies are forced to become virally-distributed. Think efficient. Without synergies, you will lack niches. We understand that it is better to harness perfectly than to evolve efficiently. What does the standard industry term "wireless" really mean? Have you ever needed to iterate your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts? What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based jargon-based commonly-accepted term "bleeding-edge" really mean? The metrics for networks are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play. The capacity to scale iteravely leads to the capability to embrace virally. Think impactful. Think blog-based. Think one-to-one. But don't think all three at the same time. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and non-complex use. Quick: do you have a leading-edge plan for handling new fractal user communities? It seems astonishing, but it's realistic! What does the term "robust" really mean? Our feature set is unparalleled, but our B2C research and development and non-complex configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement. What does it really mean to e-enable "robustly"?