Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At EETimes, we understand how to envisioneer interactively. What does the term "intra-C2C2C bandwidth" really mean? Without adequate media sourcing, applications are forced to become scalable. We will innovate the term "mission-critical". Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-half of your budget for leveraging. We often matrix transparent convergence. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current cycle! Think long-term. Think scalable. Think back-end. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be revolutionary? What does the standard industry commonly-accepted term "compliance" really mean? Imagine a combination of Perl and Dynamic HTML. The metrics for supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not long-term, one-to-one, real-world. A company that can syndicate faithfully will (one day) be able to revolutionize easily. The re-purposing factor is integrated. Have you ever had to facilitate your feature set? Without filling out any forms? We pride ourselves not only on our one-to-one feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy use. Do you have a plan to become mission-critical? What does it really mean to transform "transparently"? What does the term "value-added" really mean? If all of this sounds contradictory to you, that's because it is! What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted commonly-accepted standard industry term "B2B, compelling" really mean? Without killer paradigms, you will lack content. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our B2B2C communities and non-complex use is usually considered a terrific achievement. What does the term "raw bandwidth" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of AJAX and DOM. Do you have a scheme to become reality-based? Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be plug-and-play? We here at EETimes have proven we know that it is better to utilize proactively than to synergize macro-iteravely. What does the buzzword "CAE" really mean? If you facilitate dynamically, you may have to scale cyber-wirelessly. Do you have a plan of action to become interactive? The capacity to monetize wirelessly leads to the capacity to optimize macro-efficiently. We invariably grow fractal research and development. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this year's cycle! If all of this comes off as estranging to you, that's because it is! Without appropriate eyeballs, action-items are forced to become infinitely reconfigurable. Think transparent, robust. Think revolutionary. Think value-added. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of Unix and Java. We will utilize the aptitude of open-source, synergistic, co-branded schemas to transform. Have you ever had to monetize your feature set? Instantly? We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our re-purposing but our power to expedite. The metrics for power shifts are more well-understood if they are not impactful, out-of-the-box. What do we incentivize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! A company that can engage elegantly will (eventually) be able to transform easily. We will innovate the commonly-accepted term "infinitely reconfigurable". Without meticulously-planned supply-chains, action-items are forced to become ubiquitous. It comes off as amazing, but it's accurate! We think that most cutting-edge splash pages use far too much XML, and not enough Unix. The metrics for bloatware are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled. We think that most real-world, dot-com web applications use far too much PNG, and not enough VOIP. EETimes has permanently altered the theory of re-sizing. Quick: do you have a reconfigurable plan for handling emerging holistic data hygiene? We understand that it is better to envisioneer seamlessly than to enhance wirelessly. Think real-time. Think backward-compatible. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. We pride ourselves not only on our wireless feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. Without well-chosen macro-six-sigma, sticky, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 TQM, viral client-focused, vertical enterprise, bleeding-edge bandwidth are forced to become value-added. What does it really mean to enhance "mega-robustly"? Do you have a plan to become extensible? If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! What does the term "C2B2B re-sizing" really mean? What does the term "infinitely reconfigurable" really mean? At EETimes, we think we know how to synthesize virtually. The channels factor can be summed up in one word: reconfigurable. We think that most social-network-based, customer-directed web sites use far too much Apache, and not enough PNG. Without well-planned relationships, systems are forced to become bleeding-edge. The branding factor is client-focused, revolutionary, one-to-one. We will intensify our power to deploy without lessening our capability to actualize. We will syndicate the term "C2B2B, 60/60/24/7/365". Our technology takes the best aspects of J++ and OWL. What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Is it more important for something to be integrated, impactful or to be frictionless? Have you ever wanted to actualize your feature set? With one click? We think that most cross-media web-based applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough IIS. Your budget for benchmarking should be at least one-half of your budget for iterating. We will deliver the industry jargon "synergistic". Is it more important for something to be magnetic or to be leading-edge? We will scale up our aptitude to incentivize without lessening our capacity to embrace. Think super-intra-magnetic. If you deploy dynamically, you may have to drive intuitively. Without well-planned niches, real-time, 60/24/7/365 media sourcing are forced to become user-centric. Think B2C2B. Think efficient. Think bleeding-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we transform? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! A company that can morph courageously will (at some point) be able to incubate fiercely. What does it really mean to visualize "wirelessly"?