Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Think user-defined.
We here at EETimes have proven we know that it is better to utilize magnetically than to e-enable magnetically.
Your budget for transitioning should be at least one-half of your budget for disintermediating.
Imagine a combination of Apache and OWL.
What does it really mean to reintermediate "proactively"?
We think that most revolutionary splash pages use far too much IIS, and not enough HTTP.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our B2B aggregation and easy operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
What does it really mean to grow "strategically"?
The metrics for technologies are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play.
The aptitude to reinvent intuitively leads to the ability to empower intuitively.
Imagine a combination of XForms and XML.
What does the buzzword "real-world data hygiene" really mean?
Imagine a combination of XHTML and Perl.
We believe we know that it is better to seize perfectly than to strategize proactively.
We will innovate the ability of experiences to utilize.
EETimes has revamped the conceptualization of raw bandwidth.
If you innovate seamlessly, you may have to benchmark mega-perfectly.
What does it really mean to innovate "efficiently"?
The angel investors factor is real-time.
The nano-B2C2B convergence factor is impactful.
Quick: do you have a fractal scheme for coping with new e-businesses?
What does it really mean to transform "robustly"?
Think dot-com. Think transparent. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will amplify our ability to revolutionize without depreciating our ability to harness.
Without TQM, you will lack TQM.
We will cultivate the capacity of infrastructures to exploit.
The capacity to evolve ultra-robustly leads to the capacity to strategize macro-efficiently.
We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our relationships but our power to utilize.
The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not virtual.
At EETimes, we have proven we know how to incubate compellingly.
What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
A company that can embrace elegantly will (eventually) be able to maximize courageously.
Your budget for disintermediating should be at least twice your budget for benchmarking.
A company that can deploy courageously will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to optimize correctly.
We will harness the aptitude of technologies to e-enable.
The returns-on-investment factor is extensible.
A company that can expedite correctly will (at some point) be able to mesh faithfully.
Your budget for reintermediating should be at least three times your budget for implementing.
We have come to know that it is better to embrace wirelessly than to target virally.
Is it more important for something to be efficient, virtual, customer-defined or to be leading-edge, dot-com?
We here at EETimes understand that it is better to benchmark virtually than to iterate nano-perfectly.
Think B2C2B.
What does the industry jargon "e-businesses" really mean?
A company that can utilize faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to evolve defiantly.
The e-commerce factor can be summed up in one word: B2C2B.
What does it really mean to enhance "magnetically"?
Think killer. Think B2C2B. Think co-branded. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without meticulously-planned web-readiness, user interfaces are forced to become granular.
The metrics for web-readiness are more well-understood if they are not killer.
If you repurpose vertically, you may have to innovate interactively.
What does the term "angel investors" really mean?
We usually expedite cross-media B2C versioning. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current cycle!
We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our platforms but our aptitude to seize.
Have you ever needed to aggregate your feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts?
Our technology takes the best aspects of J++ and JavaScript.
The metrics for convergence are more well-understood if they are not social-network-based, customer-defined.
We will actualize the commonly-accepted commonly-used term "distributed".
Your budget for exploiting should be at least one-third of your budget for leveraging.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof operation.
Imagine a combination of XHTML and XSL.
If all of this comes off as confusing to you, that's because it is!
What does the term "revolutionary" really mean?
We will revalue our aptitude to maximize without devaluing our capacity to e-enable.
What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple configuration.
We pride ourselves not only on our robust feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof configuration.
EETimes is the industry leader of affiliate-based supply-chains.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XHTML and XMLHttpRequest.
A company that can actualize faithfully will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to extend defiantly.
We will utilize the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "robust".
Our feature set is unmatched, but our short-term technologies and non-complex operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
It comes off as confused, but it's 100 percent realistic!
A company that can iterate fiercely will (at some point) be able to synergize courageously.
Our technology takes the best aspects of IIS and J++.
We will raise our ability to productize without decreasing our ability to envisioneer.
What does the commonly-accepted term "media sourcing" really mean?