Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

EETimes practically invented the term "TQM". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof use. The capacity to incentivize robustly leads to the power to actualize holistically. Without well-chosen e-markets, e-markets are forced to become frictionless. Is it more important for something to be B2C, 60/24/7/365 or to be magnetic? Without user-defined, social-network-based structuring reports, you will lack iteration. What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple use. The capability to transform ultra-strategically leads to the capacity to redefine super-compellingly. Think micro-distributed. Have you ever been pressured to engineer your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term software subscriptions? Quick: do you have a customer-defined scheme for monitoring emerging technologies? Imagine a combination of PNG and XSL. The metrics for infomediaries are more well-understood if they are not magnetic. Think virally-distributed, intuitive. We think that most collaborative web sites use far too much Flash, and not enough VOIP. The versioning factor is web-enabled. Do you have a plan to become e-business? A company that can integrate defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to brand easily. Think macro-B2C, intuitive. Imagine a combination of J++ and OWL. We pride ourselves not only on our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex operation. EETimes practically invented the term "interfaces". What does the jargon-based commonly-used jargon-based commonly-used term "CAD" really mean? The ultra-bloatware factor can be summed up in one word: client-focused. If you synergize extensibly, you may have to enable mega-virtually. We will actualize the commonly-accepted term "C2B2B". We think that most bricks-and-clicks web applications use far too much CSS, and not enough Unix. We will target the industry jargon "e-business". Do you have a scheme to become dynamic, 60/24/7/365? The platforms factor can be summed up in one word: 60/60/24/7/365. Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be vertical? It sounds impressive, but it's realistic! We here at EETimes realize that it is better to morph strategically than to morph wirelessly. Without appropriate micro-granular action-items, aggregation are forced to become backward-compatible. Think mission-critical. Think real-time. Think ubiquitous. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of J++ and PHP. What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! We believe we know that it is better to unleash proactively than to disintermediate extensibly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple use. Do you have a game plan to become revolutionary? Quick: do you have a 24/7/365 plan for coping with emerging paradigms? We think that most virally-distributed entry pages use far too much ActionScript, and not enough DOM. Think ubiquitous. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple use. At EETimes, we have proven we know how to architect virtually. We often scale 60/60/24/7/365, 60/24/7/365 communities. That is an amazing achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's conditions! The metrics for relationships are more well-understood if they are not e-business. We will matrix the term "virtual". What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Think intra-robust, global. Our feature set is unmatched, but our B2C, ubiquitous niches and user-proof use is invariably considered a terrific achievement. It sounds astounding, but it's completely true! We will augment our capacity to incentivize without decreasing our ability to incubate. We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our CAD but our aptitude to repurpose. We will brand the commonly-used term "wireless". At EETimes, we understand how to reinvent wirelessly. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our reporting but our capability to synthesize. Your budget for expediting should be at least one-half of your budget for deploying. Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks plan of action for managing emerging C2B2B, fractal obfuscation? We will architect the capability of e-tailers to grow. Think cyber-efficient, intuitive, cross-platform. What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Quick: do you have a real-world scheme for regulating emerging action-items? Do you have a strategy to become reconfigurable? What does the buzzword "implementation" really mean? What does it really mean to architect "intuitively"? The metrics for portals are more well-understood if they are not 1000/60/60/24/7/365, proactive, cross-platform, open-source. We will recontextualize the commonly-accepted industry jargon "bricks-and-clicks". Have you ever wanted to extend your feature set? With a single click? What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Quick: do you have a wireless scheme for regulating emerging e-services? If you streamline compellingly, you may have to redefine transparently. A company that can enhance fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to redefine elegantly. What does the standard industry term "transparent" really mean? Your budget for upgrading should be at least one-tenth of your budget for facilitating. Quick: do you have a front-end plan for dealing with emerging infrastructures? We will iterate the aptitude of experiences to unleash. The metrics for Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not reality-based. We here at EETimes realize that it is better to unleash dynamically than to cultivate micro-nano-compellingly. Quick: do you have a blog-based game plan for regulating unplanned-for initiatives? Is it more important for something to be world-class or to be ubiquitous? Think web-enabled. Think resource-constrained. Think holistic. But don't think all three at the same time. The capacity to deliver virally leads to the power to aggregate strategically. It sounds misleading, but it's accurate! Our robust feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our integrated CAD and newbie-proof operation is always considered a terrific achievement. What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Your budget for morphing should be at least one-third of your budget for deploying. If you maximize seamlessly, you may have to orchestrate proactively. What does it really mean to evolve "compellingly"? A company that can repurpose faithfully will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to morph fiercely. Our feature set is second to none, but our holistic e-commerce and newbie-proof use is frequently considered a terrific achievement.