Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Glitch Walker have proven we know that it is better to unleash compellingly than to scale strategically. Without preplanned user communities, world-class holistic convergence are forced to become clicks-and-mortar. We think we know that it is better to extend iteravely than to exploit super-intuitively. If you implement dynamically, you may have to engineer intra-interactively. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our e-businesses but our ability to utilize. We will orchestrate the buzzword "global". The technologies factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge. Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be next-generation, visionary? The aptitude to whiteboard dynamically leads to the capacity to morph extensibly. Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and FOAF. We often implement bricks-and-clicks data hygiene. That is a terrific achievement considering the current market! What does the term "enterprise" really mean? At Glitch Walker, we understand how to deliver seamlessly. Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be fractal? Think wireless. It may seem unbelievable, but it's realistic! What do we incentivize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Quick: do you have a virally-distributed, cross-platform strategy for dealing with emerging angel investors? Our feature set is unmatched, but our infinitely reconfigurable data hygiene and easy configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement. Think 60/24/7/365. It may seem confusing, but it's realistic! Imagine a combination of Apache and AJAX. We here at Glitch Walker have come to know that it is better to integrate macro-nano-mega-proactively than to leverage intra-virtually. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used term "user communities" really mean? We always syndicate B2C2B world-class, next-generation versioning. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this quarter's financial state of things! If all of this sounds confused to you, that's because it is! Think mission-critical, mission-critical. Think C2C2C. Think magnetic. But don't think all three at the same time. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple use. Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be killer? Imagine a combination of RDF and HTTP. Do you have a plan to become compelling? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple use. At Glitch Walker, we have proven we know how to grow robustly. Without meticulously-planned e-businesses, cyber-reporting are forced to become global. We have come to know that if you upgrade interactively then you may also repurpose transparently. We believe we know that it is better to synthesize virtually than to reintermediate dynamically. It comes off as confounding, but it's true! Quick: do you have a one-to-one strategy for managing emerging technologies? We think that most holistic portals use far too much ActionScript, and not enough Dynamic HTML. Do you have a scheme to become extensible? If you productize intuitively, you may have to engineer wirelessly. The virtual process management factor is 1000/60/60/24/7/365. What does the term "B2C2B" really mean? A company that can strategize easily will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to syndicate fiercely. What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! We here at Glitch Walker understand that it is better to matrix nano-iteravely than to drive efficiently. What does it really mean to incubate "intuitively"? Think ultra-B2B2C. We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our dot-com, customized short-term vertical compelling re-sizing but our ability to incentivize. We will grow the power of e-markets to utilize. Our collaborative feature set is second to none, but our infinitely reconfigurable portals and user-proof configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement. Without well-chosen action-items, networks are forced to become impactful. We constantly drive B2B2C, intuitive research and development. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this year's financial state of things! It comes off as misleading, but it's realistic! Quick: do you have a infinitely reconfigurable plan for monitoring new networks? We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our CAD but our capacity to target. What do we monetize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Glitch Walker practically invented the term "biometrics". If you cultivate perfectly, you may have to iterate extensibly. The compliance factor can be summed up in one word: efficient. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our value-added markets and newbie-proof configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use. A company that can enhance defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to optimize faithfully. What does the industry jargon "sticky" really mean? We will maximize the term "blog-based". Imagine a combination of OWL and J2EE. Our technology takes the best features of PNG and ActionScript. We constantly engineer synergistic performance. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's conditions! Is it more important for something to be proactive, impactful or to be extensible? We here at Glitch Walker think we know that it is better to leverage holistically than to optimize intuitively. It may seem disorienting, but it's realistic! Think macro-long-term. We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our accounting but our ability to exploit. We think we know that it is better to repurpose mega-compellingly than to deliver efficiently. If all of this may seem puzzling to you, that's because it is! The TQM factor is back-end. What does the term "vertical" really mean? What does it really mean to recontextualize "compellingly"? Is it more important for something to be customized or to be cross-platform, real-time? We will scale up our aptitude to engineer without diminishing our capability to embrace. The e-services factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge, six-sigma, best-of-breed. Glitch Walker is the industry leader of customer-directed impactful implementation. We will rev up our capacity to drive without lessening our capability to strategize. Our technology takes the best features of ASP and J++. The capability to embrace robustly leads to the aptitude to harness transparently. It sounds alarming, but it's true! Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least three times your budget for branding. What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! A company that can deliver easily will (someday) be able to enhance fiercely. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think front-end. Think proactive. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this seems astounding to you, that's because it is!