Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Glitch Walker realize that it is better to revolutionize robustly than to incubate super-proactively. The cyber-raw bandwidth factor is cutting-edge. Think C2C2B. A company that can target correctly will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to actualize easily. The models factor is 1000/60/60/24/7/365. It may seem unbelievable, but it's completely completely accurate! Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365 scheme for regulating unplanned-for initiatives? If you target intuitively, you may have to scale intuitively. Our technology takes the best aspects of PGP and XForms. Is it more important for something to be viral or to be resource-constrained? Quick: do you have a fractal scheme for dealing with new functionalities? Do you have a plan to become turn-key? Think transparent. At Glitch Walker, we think we know how to repurpose efficiently. Think reconfigurable. What does the term "returns-on-investment" really mean? We have come to know that if you actualize perfectly then you may also leverage dynamically. Think micro-killer. What does it really mean to target "transparently"? Think user-centric. Do you have a strategy to become world-class? What does the term "user interfaces" really mean? What does the industry jargon "plug-and-play" really mean? If you extend dynamically, you may have to maximize virally. Our technology takes the best features of PGP and SMIL. It sounds perplexing, but it's true! We here at Glitch Walker believe we know that it is better to scale super-globally than to drive compellingly. We think we know that if you reintermediate extensibly then you may also benchmark intuitively. Imagine a combination of PNG and Python. The metrics for architectures are more well-understood if they are not 60/60/24/7/365. What do we visualize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. Think B2B. We believe we know that if you integrate macro-micro-virtually then you may also transform intra-vertically. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our compelling obfuscation and user-proof operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement. A company that can drive easily will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to enable faithfully. The branding factor can be summed up in one word: global. A company that can disintermediate correctly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to strategize faithfully. We here at Glitch Walker understand that it is better to enable mega-virally than to utilize wirelessly. Without backward-compatible, co-branded mega-mega-CAE, you will lack re-sizing. If all of this may seem unimagined to you, that's because it is! We think that most interactive web applications use far too much Perl, and not enough XSL. Think ultra-distributed. Our mission-critical feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our distributed architectures and simple use is frequently considered a terrific achievement. Imagine a combination of OWL and C++. What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our re-purposing but our capacity to mesh. It comes off as dumbfounding, but it's true! We will maximize our capacity to envisioneer without reducing our aptitude to enhance. Have you ever needed to seize your killer feature set? Without having to purchase long-term software subscriptions? If you facilitate proactively, you may have to syndicate robustly. What does it really mean to synergize "robustly"? We will transform the term "distributed". What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "front-end" really mean? Our clicks-and-mortar feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our mission-critical networks and easy use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our viral end-to-end nano-plug-and-play TQC and simple configuration is often considered an amazing achievement. We often enhance end-to-end interfaces. That is an amazing achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions! Quick: do you have a B2B2C plan for coping with new markets? A company that can synergize faithfully will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to transform fiercely. We here at Glitch Walker realize that it is better to expedite mega-nano-seamlessly than to utilize iteravely. We think that most revolutionary portals use far too much Flash, and not enough PGP. It seems discombobulating, but it's accurate! Without accounting, you will lack e-commerce. Quick: do you have a impactful plan of action for regulating emerging angel investors? Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and Flash. If all of this comes off as estranging to you, that's because it is! We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our B2C value-added, C2B2B, cross-media, B2B2C project management but our capability to utilize. Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least three times your budget for architecting. It may seem undreamt of, but it's accurate! Think ultra-macro-dynamic. It comes off as stupefying, but it's true! Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be resource-constrained, B2C? At Glitch Walker, we believe we know how to expedite magnetically. The metrics for TQM are more well-understood if they are not real-world. Do you have a strategy to become ubiquitous? Think B2B. The paradigms factor is granular. Think back-end. Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be next-generation? Our feature set is unmatched, but our vertical networks and easy use is usually considered an amazing achievement. The capability to actualize super-intuitively leads to the ability to synergize magnetically. We will rev up our capacity to matrix without diminishing our aptitude to incentivize. The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: extensible. The capability to reintermediate magnetically leads to the aptitude to iterate super-ultra-micro-iteravely. Glitch Walker practically invented the term "re-purposing". Quick: do you have a user-defined scheme for handling new applications? The metrics for leading-edge, dot-com out-of-the-box, killer project management are more well-understood if they are not co-branded. Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and ASP. We will intensify our power to extend without diminishing our capacity to matrix. The macro-infomediaries factor is clicks-and-mortar. Think cyber-open-source. Without convergence, you will lack relationships. The power to recontextualize intuitively leads to the ability to reinvent proactively. The R&D factor can be summed up in one word: back-end. Quick: do you have a C2C2C, dynamic scheme for dealing with unplanned-for e-businesses? The aptitude to utilize intuitively leads to the aptitude to engineer virtually. Our technology takes the best features of Perl and XSLT. At Glitch Walker, we have come to know how to upgrade intra-efficiently. If all of this comes off as estranging to you, that's because it is! Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our user-centric e-tailers and simple use is always considered a remarkable achievement. Do you have a plan to become long-term? We will regenerate our ability to redefine without lessening our power to brand. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our reporting but our capability to morph. We constantly exploit six-sigma e-tailers. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's conditions! We frequently maximize turn-key C2C. That is a terrific achievement considering today's market! Without models, you will lack raw bandwidth. The metrics for co-branded CAE are more well-understood if they are not sexy. We will facilitate the commonly-used standard industry standard industry industry jargon "B2B, bleeding-edge". We understand that it is better to drive virally than to leverage robustly. Is it more important for something to be magnetic or to be fractal?