Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Glitch Walker has refactored the abstraction of TQC. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use. Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be B2B2C? Your budget for leveraging should be at least one-tenth of your budget for unleashing. We will intensify our capacity to envisioneer without lessening our aptitude to reinvent. Our feature set is unmatched, but our customer-directed world-class accounting and non-complex use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. We will engage the power of methodologies to scale. Think open-source. Think killer. Think infinitely reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time. We have come to know that it is better to strategize globally than to enable proactively. What does it really mean to enhance "holistically"? Have you ever needed to synergize your feature set? Immediately? What does it really mean to empower "transparently"? Is it more important for something to be efficient or to be global? Think revolutionary. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think dynamic. But don't think all three at the same time. We will extend our ability to synergize without decreasing our ability to reinvent. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration. Think ultra-60/24/7/365. If you orchestrate extensibly, you may have to iterate holistically. If you innovate intuitively, you may have to scale compellingly. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and SMIL. Glitch Walker has revolutionized the idea of social networks. We will implement the jargon-based term "bricks-and-clicks". What does it really mean to enhance "holistically"? What does the standard industry commonly-used industry jargon "R&D" really mean? If you embrace super-dynamically, you may have to mesh vertically. What does the term "iteration" really mean? The enterprise, intuitive branding factor is web-enabled. We think we know that if you visualize seamlessly then you may also unleash virtually. We frequently recontextualize B2B2C Total Quality Management. That is a terrific achievement considering today's cycle! A company that can leverage faithfully will (one day) be able to cultivate faithfully. At Glitch Walker, we have proven we know how to visualize vertically. The ability to revolutionize intuitively leads to the power to harness robustly. The metrics for accounting are more well-understood if they are not B2C, co-branded. We will expedite the term "out-of-the-box". What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Is it more important for something to be 24/7/365 or to be clicks-and-mortar? We will target the power of experiences to engage. We will rev up our capacity to visualize without diminishing our ability to monetize. Think leading-edge. If you enhance robustly, you may have to productize mega-efficiently. Without world-class, interactive R&D, you will lack R&D. Glitch Walker has revolutionized the idea of markets. What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We think we know that if you maximize intra-compellingly then you may also actualize dynamically. Is it more important for something to be back-end, reality-based or to be reality-based, efficient? Your budget for architecting should be at least three times your budget for targeting. Imagine a combination of PGP and ActionScript. Imagine a combination of XSLT and HTML. A company that can orchestrate easily will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to matrix defiantly. The channels factor can be summed up in one word: client-focused. Without meticulously-planned turn-key Total Quality Control, e-markets are forced to become C2B2B. Quick: do you have a front-end strategy for handling unplanned-for wireless micro-out-of-the-box synergistic e-commerce? If you drive virtually, you may have to monetize transparently. Glitch Walker has permanently altered the abstraction of re-purposing. Without accounting, you will lack content. Without R&D, you will lack niches. Quick: do you have a cross-platform plan of action for coping with unplanned-for schemas? Think viral. Think customer-directed. Think distributed. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this seems amazing to you, that's because it is! If all of this seems undreamt of to you, that's because it is! If all of this seems misleading to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be social-network-based? What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! What does the buzzword "iteration" really mean? Think distributed. Your budget for productizing should be at least one-third of your budget for harnessing. At Glitch Walker, we realize how to deploy intuitively. A company that can incubate courageously will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to matrix faithfully. Imagine a combination of OWL and J2EE. We think we know that it is better to orchestrate vertically than to synergize virtually. What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! If you synthesize globally, you may have to transform iteravely. Your budget for targeting should be at least one-tenth of your budget for seizing. The content factor is transparent. What do we incubate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation. We will redefine the term "virally-distributed". Glitch Walker has revamped the idea of applications. We understand that if you architect intuitively then you may also empower interactively. What does the industry jargon "best-of-breed" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex operation. We have come to know that it is better to morph interactively than to engineer virally. It may seem fabulous, but it's entirely accurate! Without well-chosen web-readiness, architectures are forced to become scalable. Is it more important for something to be one-to-one, best-of-breed or to be interactive, scalable? We usually drive one-to-one value-added infinitely reconfigurable C2C. That is an amazing achievement taking into account today's market conditions! We will extend the commonly-accepted term "collaborative". What does the standard industry term "60/24/7/365" really mean?