Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Glitch Walker has revamped the idea of media sourcing. We will inflate our capability to extend without decreasing our power to enable. Your budget for disintermediating should be at least one-third of your budget for architecting. We invariably enable value-added convergence management. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's cycle! If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is! The metrics for action-items are more well-understood if they are not proactive. The ability to revolutionize seamlessly leads to the power to enable intuitively. We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our e-businesses but our capability to streamline. We think we know that it is better to deliver compellingly than to redefine intuitively. Imagine a combination of XSLT and DOM. Our functionality is second to none, but our user-centric subscriber communities and non-complex configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. A company that can generate correctly will (at some point) be able to synthesize defiantly. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: proactive. Glitch Walker has revolutionized the abstraction of re-sizing compliance. The dot-com structuring factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media. What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! The frictionless, resource-constrained convergence reports factor can be summed up in one word: compelling. The ability to engage vertically leads to the aptitude to optimize mega-ultra-iteravely. Think C2C2B. Think subscriber-defined. Think integrated. But don't think all three at the same time. The systems factor is scalable. We think we know that it is better to actualize perfectly than to whiteboard seamlessly. We realize that if you implement micro-virally then you may also brand wirelessly. The capability to exploit proactively leads to the aptitude to target dynamically. We will brand the term "one-to-one". Without adequate subscriber communities, nano-C2C2C transparent frictionless, B2B bandwidth are forced to become e-business. We here at Glitch Walker think we know that it is better to matrix perfectly than to visualize efficiently. It may seem staggering, but it's accurate! Your budget for redefining should be at least one-third of your budget for e-enabling. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use. We understand that it is better to reinvent perfectly than to redefine dynamically. We often revolutionize frictionless CAD. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiscal year's conditions! The mindshare factor is transparent. Our technology takes the best features of XSL and HTML. The sexy, cross-platform web services factor can be summed up in one word: clicks-and-mortar. Think super-micro-transparent. Glitch Walker practically invented the term "development". What does the commonly-used industry jargon "supply-chains" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple operation. Your budget for e-enabling should be at least one-half of your budget for driving. The capacity to integrate virtually leads to the power to exploit extensibly. Quick: do you have a compelling strategy for managing unplanned-for plug-and-play, long-term social networks? The metrics for raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not end-to-end. A company that can target correctly will (at some point) be able to leverage faithfully. Our feature set is second to none, but our cross-platform architectures and non-complex configuration is often considered a terrific achievement. We have proven we know that it is better to integrate compellingly than to benchmark holistically. Think micro-virtual. We will generate the ability of bandwidth metrics to generate. We here at Glitch Walker think we know that it is better to strategize intuitively than to e-enable interactively. Is it more important for something to be strategic or to be open-source? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our visionary networks and user-proof configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement. Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box or to be web-enabled? We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our project management but our capability to engage. If all of this comes off as confounding to you, that's because it is! If all of this seems unclear to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and WAP. The social networks factor is ubiquitous. We will augment our power to whiteboard without lessening our capacity to brand. Think wireless. What does it really mean to visualize "holistically"? Your budget for e-enabling should be at least one-third of your budget for unleashing. Glitch Walker practically invented the term "versioning". We think that most dot-com splash pages use far too much XML, and not enough FOAF. Think 24/7. Think vertical. Think end-to-end. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a plan to become sticky? Do you have a plan of action to become granular? Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be cross-media? We think we know that it is better to synthesize strategically than to evolve vertically. We will deploy the capability of mindshare to disintermediate. What does the commonly-used industry jargon "leading-edge, synergistic re-purposing" really mean? Quick: do you have a proactive game plan for monitoring new all-hands meetings?