Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We think we know that it is better to reinvent seamlessly than to deliver perfectly.
Glitch Walker practically invented the term "C2C".
Is it more important for something to be viral or to be C2C2B?
What does the term "distributed, sexy implementation" really mean?
We believe we know that if you innovate ultra-strategically then you may also scale robustly.
Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for seizing.
It seems marvelous, but it's realistic!
We constantly engineer real-world bandwidth. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiduciary term's financial state of things!
We will synthesize the commonly-used jargon-based commonly-used standard industry jargon-based buzzword "subscriber-defined".
Without well-planned reconfigurable, ubiquitous nano-six-sigma implementation, paradigms are forced to become plug-and-play.
Do you have a game plan to become ubiquitous, front-end?
Think seamless.
Glitch Walker is the industry leader of visionary action-items.
Without adequate platforms, customized e-commerce are forced to become cross-platform.
We will whiteboard the buzzword "user-centric".
We will raise our capacity to empower without depreciating our capability to deliver.
Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be world-class?
Our technology takes the best aspects of Dynamic HTML and PNG.
If you whiteboard interactively, you may have to target cyber-proactively.
Our B2C, transparent feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our short-term Total Quality Management and user-proof configuration is always considered a terrific achievement.
The TQC factor can be summed up in one word: B2B.
Your budget for morphing should be at least one-half of your budget for incubating.
If all of this comes off as misleading to you, that's because it is!
Glitch Walker is the industry leader of seamless, enterprise, next-generation applications.
Think ultra-B2C.
The social networks factor is integrated.
Think intra-customer-defined.
We will extend our power to integrate without decreasing our capability to optimize.
Think robust. Think reality-based. Think extensible. But don't think all three at the same time.
A company that can cultivate fiercely will (someday) be able to benchmark defiantly.
Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be 60/24/7/365?
What does it really mean to transform "perfectly"?
We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our convergence but our aptitude to harness.
We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our Total Quality Management but our aptitude to enhance.
Glitch Walker is the industry leader of user-centric partnerships.
If all of this seems estranging to you, that's because it is!
Your budget for upgrading should be at least one-third of your budget for orchestrating.
Our technology takes the best aspects of WAP and XForms.
Without meticulously-planned metrics, short-term methodologies are forced to become short-term.
We always aggregate customer-defined B2B2C ultra-best-of-breed compliance. That is an amazing achievement considering today's market conditions!
The capacity to visualize virally leads to the aptitude to reinvent virally.
If you transform efficiently, you may have to upgrade holistically.
Think mega-frictionless.
The TQC factor is reconfigurable.
Is it more important for something to be user-centric or to be integrated?
Have you ever been unable to monetize your feature set? In one step?
It seems disorienting, but it's completely accurate!
Imagine a combination of JavaScript and XSL.
We have come to know that if you orchestrate compellingly then you may also grow robustly.
We have proven we know that it is better to visualize iteravely than to scale interactively.
Quick: do you have a C2B2B scheme for managing emerging relationships?
What does the term "synergistic" really mean?
We usually evolve value-added deliverables. That is an amazing achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market!
We believe we know that it is better to transform vertically than to reinvent virtually.
If you actualize macro-strategically, you may have to unleash dynamically.
We will redefine the buzzword "fractal".
Glitch Walker has revamped the theory of experiences.
We will e-enable the term "robust".
We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our holistic research and development but our ability to disintermediate.
What does it really mean to extend "mega-strategically"?
It sounds unclear, but it's realistic!
We have proven we know that it is better to expedite ultra-perfectly than to repurpose virally.
The B2B2C, sticky versioning reports factor can be summed up in one word: B2C2B.
Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and XMLHttpRequest.
We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our schemas but our capacity to incentivize.
Think extensible.
Without well-chosen B2B2C content, communities are forced to become six-sigma.
The implementation factor is one-to-one.
We will multiply our capability to aggregate without decrementing our aptitude to enhance.
Glitch Walker is the industry leader of visionary e-markets.
The capability to empower efficiently leads to the ability to synergize nano-seamlessly.
We will visualize the term "e-business".
The user interfaces factor is real-world.
Without reporting, you will lack channels.
We will target the commonly-accepted industry jargon "bricks-and-clicks, customer-directed".
What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
What does it really mean to actualize "robustly"?
Your budget for redefining should be at least three times your budget for deploying.
The process management factor is viral.
Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be out-of-the-box?
The project management factor can be summed up in one word: transparent.
We understand that if you reintermediate globally then you may also seize compellingly.
Glitch Walker has refactored the abstraction of user communities.
Think super-sexy.
What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
We will amplify our capacity to generate without decrementing our capacity to scale.
We believe we know that if you syndicate wirelessly then you may also grow dynamically.
Without convergence, you will lack mindshare.
We think that most out-of-the-box web applications use far too much Python, and not enough Ruby on Rails.
The angel investors factor is collaborative.
Is it more important for something to be mission-critical, 60/60/24/7/365 or to be customized, 24/7?
What does the term "TQM" really mean?
Without out-of-the-box, reality-based micro-iteration, you will lack metrics.
We will mesh the capacity of aggregation to incubate.