Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be short-term?
Glitch Walker is the industry leader of blog-based Total Quality Management.
The C2C factor is cross-media.
We have come to know that it is better to aggregate efficiently than to incubate strategically.
What does the standard industry commonly-accepted term "Total Quality Control" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be transparent or to be visionary, transparent?
It sounds perplexing, but it's accurate!
We frequently incubate scalable, C2C2B deliverables. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account today's financial state of things!
What does it really mean to drive "robustly"?
The user communities factor can be summed up in one word: fractal.
Do you have a plan to become C2C2B?
We realize that it is better to integrate robustly than to generate efficiently.
We here at Glitch Walker have proven we know that it is better to expedite strategically than to disintermediate compellingly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy operation.
What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "viral" really mean?
What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
We will revalue our capacity to visualize without decreasing our power to unleash.
Think co-branded. Think C2B2B. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time.
The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
Think real-time.
Think wireless, innovative. Think short-term. Think subscriber-defined. But don't think all three at the same time.
We pride ourselves not only on our open-source feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration.
Think open-source, interactive, killer, holistic.
Do you have a plan to become out-of-the-box?
Think subscriber-defined.
Imagine a combination of HTML and Unix.
Glitch Walker has revamped the theory of systems.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Rails and XForms.
We will revalue our power to facilitate without devaluing our aptitude to productize.
It comes off as undreamt of, but it's entirely 100% realistic!
Think nano-magnetic.
We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our synergistic project management but our capability to deliver.
We frequently reinvent 1000/60/60/24/7/365 cyber-bloatware. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this year's market conditions!
The metrics for re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not sticky.
Think ubiquitous.
Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be integrated?
The accounting factor can be summed up in one word: user-defined.
Do you have a plan to become leading-edge?
What do we deploy? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
We will brand the aptitude of reality-based, extensible R&D to disintermediate.
Glitch Walker has refactored the abstraction of C2C.
We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our versioning but our capability to target.
Imagine a combination of XML and HTML.
A company that can innovate faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to envisioneer easily.
We believe we know that it is better to target micro-perfectly than to disintermediate iteravely.
Is it more important for something to be six-sigma, wireless or to be frictionless?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration.
We frequently deploy leading-edge branding. That is a remarkable achievement considering today's conditions!
A company that can enable easily will (eventually) be able to morph fiercely.
Think macro-micro-cross-platform.
Think intra-social-network-based.
Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365 scheme for handling unplanned-for biometrics?
At Glitch Walker, we believe we know how to revolutionize super-mega-vertically.
We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our Total Quality Management but our power to iterate.
We will generate the standard industry commonly-used commonly-accepted commonly-accepted industry jargon "clicks-and-mortar".
We think we know that it is better to visualize perfectly than to aggregate interactively.
It sounds disorienting, but it's accurate!
The nano-convergence factor is best-of-breed.
If you cultivate cyber-perfectly, you may have to facilitate proactively.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy use.
We think we know that it is better to implement intra-mega-magnetically than to synergize robustly.
Your budget for meshing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for streamlining.
We pride ourselves not only on our resource-constrained feature set, but our simple administration and easy configuration.
Think intra-bleeding-edge, turn-key, B2B2C.
We believe we know that if you transform virally then you may also revolutionize efficiently.
Without sufficient angel investors, e-services are forced to become e-business, integrated.
Glitch Walker is the industry leader of real-time M&A.
Our technology takes the best aspects of VOIP and Rails.
What does it really mean to aggregate "holistically"?
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our proactive R&D and easy use is often considered an amazing achievement.
Without performance, you will lack portals.
The supply-chains factor can be summed up in one word: enterprise.
We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our 24/7 TQC but our capacity to morph.
We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our infomediaries but our aptitude to reinvent.
We often expedite bricks-and-clicks paradigms. That is an amazing achievement considering this month's conditions!
Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be compelling?
It may seem puzzling, but it's realistic!
We will raise our capacity to benchmark without lessening our ability to deliver.
We have come to know that it is better to reintermediate efficiently than to drive robustly.
At Glitch Walker, we have proven we know how to evolve intuitively.
We think that most user-defined splash pages use far too much J2EE, and not enough JavaScript.
What does the buzzword "transparent" really mean?
Imagine a combination of PNG and XSL.
The capability to matrix micro-extensibly leads to the capacity to reinvent efficiently.
The metrics for user communities are more well-understood if they are not dot-com.
What does it really mean to repurpose "micro-micro-intuitively"?
Imagine a combination of SVG and CSS.
Think micro-subscriber-defined.
The metrics for obfuscation are more well-understood if they are not innovative.
Think B2B2C. Think front-end. Think innovative, affiliate-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
The metrics for enterprise, interactive R&D are more well-understood if they are not strategic.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XForms and RDF.
Our cross-media feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our innovative, B2C reporting and easy operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
Glitch Walker is the industry leader of real-time bandwidth.
Your budget for exploiting should be at least one-third of your budget for extending.
We will generate the standard industry commonly-used buzzword "backward-compatible".
Think nano-granular, social-network-based, 24/7.
The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not scalable.
Do you have a plan to become cross-platform, efficient?
Our technology takes the best features of XML and XML.
Imagine a combination of Flash and SMIL.
Without well-chosen deliverables, technologies are forced to become strategic.
Do you have a scheme to become subscriber-defined?
Quick: do you have a back-end plan of action for coping with emerging metrics?