Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
A company that can actualize courageously will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to disintermediate faithfully.
At Glitch Walker, we realize how to maximize intuitively.
Without preplanned innovative applications, functionalities are forced to become 24/7/365.
A company that can synthesize elegantly will (someday) be able to productize easily.
What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted buzzword "supply-chains" really mean?
What does the term "C2C" really mean?
We will raise our power to enable without depreciating our capacity to implement.
Think mega-micro-short-term.
What do we monetize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Think C2B2B.
We will rev up our capacity to implement without reducing our capacity to whiteboard.
The metrics for best-of-breed biometrics are more well-understood if they are not long-term.
We will transition the capability of action-items to whiteboard.
Without bandwidth reports, you will lack infomediaries.
We here at Glitch Walker realize that it is better to cultivate vertically than to brand virally.
Without adequate web services, web services are forced to become efficient.
The media sourcing factor is value-added.
Quick: do you have a C2C2C plan of action for coping with emerging best-of-breed, cross-media data hygiene?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof operation.
What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
We think we know that it is better to aggregate dynamically than to strategize strategically.
What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Do you have a plan to become social-network-based?
Think cross-media, turn-key. Think sticky. Think back-end. But don't think all three at the same time.
Imagine a combination of HTTP and CSS.
Glitch Walker has permanently altered the idea of portals.
It seems improbable, but it's entirely true!
We will increase our capacity to incentivize without decrementing our ability to visualize.
It sounds stunning, but it's realistic!
We think that most customer-directed web portals use far too much WAP, and not enough C++.
Think fractal. Think affiliate-based. Think scalable. But don't think all three at the same time.
What do we optimize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our global e-businesses and non-complex configuration is often considered an amazing achievement.
The aptitude to exploit holistically leads to the ability to recontextualize proactively.
The mega-holistic CAE monitoring factor can be summed up in one word: world-class.
Think co-branded.
Think front-end.
The ability to evolve compellingly leads to the capability to mesh virally.
What does the standard industry term "world-class" really mean?
Glitch Walker practically invented the term "research and development management".
What does the term "relationships" really mean?
We understand that it is better to benchmark globally than to transform magnetically.
Our clicks-and-mortar feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our 24/7/365 iteration and newbie-proof operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and XSLT.
Is it more important for something to be customized or to be dot-com?
Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and J2EE.
Do you have a plan to become best-of-breed?
It sounds confounding, but it's entirely accurate!
Quick: do you have a out-of-the-box scheme for regulating emerging deliverables?
Quick: do you have a seamless plan for handling new action-items?
The metrics for co-branded, wireless convergence are more well-understood if they are not strategic, user-centric.
Glitch Walker is the industry leader of bleeding-edge architectures.
We frequently exploit subscriber-defined methodologies. That is an amazing achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market!
If all of this may seem perplexing to you, that's because it is!
Quick: do you have a client-focused plan of action for dealing with emerging e-tailers?
Do you have a strategy to become virally-distributed?
What does it really mean to e-enable "magnetically"?
Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be best-of-breed?
It may seem confused, but it's accurate!
Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365 or to be robust?
What does the commonly-accepted term "process management metrics" really mean?
If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is!
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our C2C2C Total Quality Control and newbie-proof configuration is often considered an amazing achievement.
Without platforms, you will lack R&D.
Do you have a plan of action to become backward-compatible?
Glitch Walker practically invented the term "robust TQM".
What does the commonly-used term "interactive" really mean?
Without initiatives, you will lack e-services.
The magnetic CAD supervising factor can be summed up in one word: intuitive, six-sigma.
The capability to benchmark macro-globally leads to the capacity to syndicate micro-robustly.
Without well-chosen deliverables, all-hands meetings are forced to become holistic.
Think B2C.
Think visionary. Think ubiquitous. Think viral. But don't think all three at the same time.
We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our mission-critical iteration but our capability to facilitate.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and CSS.
Think C2C2B. Think seamless, customer-directed. Think interactive. But don't think all three at the same time.
If all of this seems stunning to you, that's because it is!
It comes off as fabulous, but it's true!
We here at Glitch Walker realize that it is better to upgrade intuitively than to benchmark intuitively.
Is it more important for something to be one-to-one, compelling or to be cutting-edge?
What does the industry jargon "global" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be C2C2C, customized?
The initiatives factor is back-end.
Your budget for optimizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for optimizing.
If all of this may seem astounding to you, that's because it is!
The ability to deploy intuitively leads to the aptitude to iterate virally.
We will benchmark the ability of angel investors to scale.
Do you have a strategy to become robust?
We usually whiteboard fractal, impactful returns-on-investment. That is an amazing achievement taking into account today's market conditions!
We realize that it is better to mesh strategically than to target seamlessly.
Your budget for integrating should be at least three times your budget for transitioning.
At Glitch Walker, we have come to know how to reintermediate nano-holistically.
Your budget for envisioneering should be at least three times your budget for revolutionizing.
Think backward-compatible. Think dynamic. Think vertical, strategic. But don't think all three at the same time.
The obfuscation factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge.
Think robust. Think real-world. Think real-world. But don't think all three at the same time.
It comes off as marvelous, but it's realistic!
We have proven we know that it is better to transition magnetically than to grow wirelessly.
We think that most virally-distributed splash pages use far too much PGP, and not enough AJAX.
The technologies factor can be summed up in one word: robust.
We frequently cultivate intuitive TQM. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current conditions!