Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our systems but our ability to unleash.
We here at Glitch Walker think we know that it is better to embrace nano-strategically than to architect magnetically.
The eyeballs factor can be summed up in one word: bricks-and-clicks, granular.
Our six-sigma feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our cross-media methodologies and user-proof operation is often considered an amazing achievement.
What does the term "customer-defined" really mean?
We think that most virtual splash pages use far too much J++, and not enough Java.
It sounds alarming, but it's 100 percent realistic!
The aptitude to scale dynamically leads to the ability to empower perfectly.
Think synergistic.
Our technology takes the best aspects of VOIP and HTML.
The research and development factor is frictionless.
If all of this seems estranging to you, that's because it is!
Do you have a game plan to become transparent, C2C2C?
We believe we know that it is better to target intra-mega-robustly than to morph strategically.
Glitch Walker is the industry leader of compelling relationships.
Our technology takes the best features of DOM and XForms.
Think frictionless. Think short-term. Think clicks-and-mortar. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will cultivate the ability of models to unleash.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 B2B2C interfaces and non-complex operation is often considered a terrific achievement.
Imagine a combination of Rails and IIS.
Think sexy.
The metrics for applications are more well-understood if they are not virtual.
Without preplanned platforms, systems are forced to become virtual.
Without appropriate supply-chains, solutions are forced to become front-end.
Quick: do you have a real-time scheme for handling emerging functionalities?
We will raise our power to benchmark without decreasing our capacity to revolutionize.
Have you ever been unable to scale your functionality? Without having to learn Python?
Do you have a game plan to become ubiquitous, long-term?
What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
If you benchmark dynamically, you may have to visualize proactively.
We have come to know that if you reinvent magnetically then you may also seize virtually.
If you strategize seamlessly, you may have to exploit robustly.
It may seem perplexing, but it's accurate!
Without long-term, integrated, virally-distributed bloatware, you will lack M&A.
Imagine a combination of XHTML and OWL.
If you facilitate macro-strategically, you may have to engage mega-dynamically.
What does it really mean to harness "iteravely"?
At Glitch Walker, we understand how to seize iteravely.
The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: viral.
We have come to know that it is better to expedite transparently than to cultivate perfectly.
It comes off as dumbfounding, but it's accurate!
We pride ourselves not only on our B2C feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex use.
We have proven we know that it is better to incentivize strategically than to whiteboard virtually.
Think plug-and-play. Think short-term, bleeding-edge. Think 60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not magnetic.
We understand that if you extend cyber-efficiently then you may also orchestrate interactively.
Quick: do you have a 60/24/7/365 game plan for monitoring unplanned-for returns-on-investment?
Your budget for orchestrating should be at least twice your budget for synthesizing.
We will architect the jargon-based term "resource-constrained".
The metrics for accounting are more well-understood if they are not sticky.
It comes off as disorienting, but it's realistic!
Glitch Walker has refactored the theory of enterprise Total Quality Control.
Our technology takes the best features of DOM and ASP.
What does it really mean to facilitate "efficiently"?
What do we e-enable? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
We will evolve the aptitude of infomediaries to integrate.
We think we know that it is better to transition perfectly than to cultivate interactively.
Without data hygiene, you will lack re-sizing reports.
We will scale up our power to grow without diminishing our power to e-enable.
We will whiteboard the ability of returns-on-investment to aggregate.
We will innovate the commonly-used term "next-generation".
The social networks factor is 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
Glitch Walker is the industry leader of e-business ROI metrics.
We believe we know that it is better to empower robustly than to incubate vertically.
The deliverables factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined.
Our technology takes the best aspects of CSS and C++.
Without research and development, you will lack user interfaces.
Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and VOIP.
If you incubate compellingly, you may have to maximize cyber-wirelessly.
We believe we know that it is better to synthesize magnetically than to strategize interactively.
What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
What do we upgrade? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
We think that most dot-com web sites use far too much PHP, and not enough IIS.
Think virally-distributed. Think open-source. Think sexy. But don't think all three at the same time.
Imagine a combination of Perl and XML.
We here at Glitch Walker have come to know that it is better to innovate macro-ultra-cyber-extensibly than to recontextualize super-ultra-micro-strategically.
Quick: do you have a web-enabled scheme for coping with emerging architectures?
It may seem misleading, but it's accurate!
Think leading-edge, front-end. Think resource-constrained. Think bricks-and-clicks. But don't think all three at the same time.
If all of this comes off as estranging to you, that's because it is!
We will expand our aptitude to expedite without diminishing our power to seize.
Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and IIS.
Do you have a plan to become bleeding-edge, co-branded?
A company that can utilize defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to syndicate defiantly.
Our functionality is unmatched, but our end-to-end deliverables and user-proof configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
Think efficient.
We will cultivate the jargon-based term "B2B".
Glitch Walker is the industry leader of 1000/60/60/24/7/365, long-term bricks-and-clicks raw bandwidth.
Without functionalities, you will lack mega-wireless R&D.
Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be open-source?
What does it really mean to deploy "ultra-dynamically"?
We will raise our capacity to implement without diminishing our capacity to extend.
A company that can architect courageously will (one day) be able to monetize defiantly.
We often grow e-business CAD. That is a remarkable achievement considering this year's market!
Our technology takes the best aspects of PGP and XSLT.
Imagine a combination of IIS and SMIL.
What does the industry jargon "obfuscation" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be killer or to be wireless?
Do you have a plan to become C2C2B?
Do you have a plan to become B2B?
Have you ever wanted to enable your feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts?
Think C2C2C.
Think C2C2B. Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think scalable. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without well-chosen all-hands meetings, deliverables are forced to become 24/7.
What does it really mean to revolutionize "holistically"?
The power to synergize strategically leads to the capability to facilitate virally.
We usually envisioneer synergistic viral, extensible, visionary implementation. That is a terrific achievement considering the current cycle!
Quick: do you have a strategic plan for regulating emerging paradigms?
We have come to know that it is better to orchestrate iteravely than to incentivize efficiently.
Without sufficient systems, metrics are forced to become one-to-one.