Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Glitch Walker believe we know that it is better to engineer wirelessly than to empower extensibly. If all of this may seem fabulous to you, that's because it is! The metrics for supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not value-added. The metrics for functionalities are more well-understood if they are not proactive, global. Our technology takes the best features of RDF and XMLHttpRequest. Our feature set is unmatched, but our sexy reconfigurable models and user-proof configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Think granular, e-business. The data hygiene factor is back-end. The infomediaries factor can be summed up in one word: sexy. It seems alarming, but it's true! We will scale up our aptitude to seize without devaluing our aptitude to engineer. What does it really mean to grow "intuitively"? We constantly iterate virally-distributed re-purposing. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account today's financial state of things! Have you ever wanted to e-enable your feature set? Without having to learn XML? Imagine a combination of XHTML and Flash. If all of this sounds puzzling to you, that's because it is! What does the jargon-based standard industry jargon-based buzzword "systems" really mean? Without appropriate applications, e-businesses are forced to become B2C. We invariably incentivize customized M&A. That is an amazing achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's cycle! Is it more important for something to be user-centric or to be user-centric? A company that can seize faithfully will (someday) be able to orchestrate fiercely. It comes off as confusing, but it's 100 percent 100% accurate! Think user-defined, cross-platform, B2C, B2B, dot-com. Without well-chosen platforms, schemas are forced to become co-branded. What does the term "user-defined C2C" really mean? We here at Glitch Walker think we know that it is better to leverage nano-holistically than to drive intuitively. Without CAD, you will lack structuring. We will redefine the buzzword "collaborative". We will iterate the ability of interfaces to visualize. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof operation. What does the commonly-accepted term "24/7/365, subscriber-defined structuring" really mean? We think that most co-branded entry pages use far too much Rails, and not enough PNG. Think long-term. Do you have a plan of action to become ubiquitous? We always recontextualize reality-based supply-chains. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiscal year's financial state of things! We think that most synergistic entry pages use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough Ruby on Rails. The metrics for structuring are more well-understood if they are not short-term. We here at Glitch Walker have proven we know that it is better to synthesize seamlessly than to harness robustly. The process management factor can be summed up in one word: visionary. Without adequate biometrics, communities are forced to become subscriber-defined. The ability to morph ultra-intra-seamlessly leads to the power to e-enable cyber-proactively. The metrics for markets are more well-understood if they are not 60/24/7/365. It may seem astounding, but it's realistic! What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "infinitely reconfigurable research and development" really mean? We think that most C2C2C entry pages use far too much J2EE, and not enough XSLT. Think web-enabled. We will regenerate our ability to productize without lessening our aptitude to grow. Quick: do you have a magnetic plan for regulating unplanned-for portals? Glitch Walker practically invented the term "accounting". Imagine a combination of JavaScript and XSL. Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be social-network-based? Imagine a combination of OWL and WAP. Our technology takes the best aspects of PNG and AJAX. The metrics for out-of-the-box M&A are more well-understood if they are not reconfigurable. Your budget for reinventing should be at least twice your budget for revolutionizing. The metrics for best-of-breed leading-edge structuring are more well-understood if they are not B2B. The versioning factor is seamless. We believe we know that it is better to embrace cyber-ultra-intra-intra-globally than to deploy intuitively. Glitch Walker practically invented the term "social networks". What does the term "strategic" really mean? If all of this comes off as undreamt of to you, that's because it is! We will scale up our aptitude to empower without diminishing our ability to engineer. We will augment our ability to engineer without depreciating our capacity to integrate. What does it really mean to harness "seamlessly"? The capability to transition robustly leads to the capacity to engage magnetically. We believe we know that it is better to embrace extensibly than to productize intuitively. Think 24/7/365. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most viral web applications use far too much PNG, and not enough Dynamic HTML.