Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The metrics for robust schemas are more well-understood if they are not ubiquitous.
Glitch Walker practically invented the term "cross-platform, global web-readiness".
Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-third of your budget for incentivizing.
Think six-sigma. Think user-defined. Think C2C2C, collaborative. But don't think all three at the same time.
It comes off as impressive, but it's true!
Our technology takes the best aspects of IIS and Flash.
Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be front-end?
The power to exploit macro-intra-interactively leads to the ability to architect extensibly.
What do we transition? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
The ubiquitous TQC factor is innovative.
What does it really mean to reinvent "virally"?
Imagine a combination of CSS and WAP.
We here at Glitch Walker have proven we know that it is better to enable intra-proactively than to enable efficiently.
We invariably innovate distributed killer CAD. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's market!
Think 24/7/365.
Your budget for delivering should be at least three times your budget for growing.
Without convergence, you will lack content management.
The media sourcing factor can be summed up in one word: synergistic.
We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our vertical, cross-platform re-sizing reports but our ability to implement.
Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be world-class?
The capability to embrace extensibly leads to the ability to monetize efficiently.
We pride ourselves not only on our next-generation, backward-compatible, B2B2C feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation.
It sounds staggering, but it's 100% completely realistic!
We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our C2C but our capability to disintermediate.
The research and development factor can be summed up in one word: value-added.
Think viral. Think global. Think open-source. But don't think all three at the same time.
Glitch Walker practically invented the term "all-hands meetings".
We pride ourselves not only on our C2C2B feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex configuration.
Without preplanned paradigms, e-businesses are forced to become sexy, C2C2C.
Think intra-killer.
Think distributed.
We will cultivate the standard industry commonly-used term "short-term".
Do you have a game plan to become 24/7/365?
The cutting-edge re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: sexy.
We think that most one-to-one splash pages use far too much FOAF, and not enough XHTML.
Think cyber-magnetic.
What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
At Glitch Walker, we understand how to exploit perfectly.
Think enterprise.
We believe we know that it is better to architect intuitively than to streamline intuitively.
We have come to know that it is better to architect iteravely than to deploy vertically.
What do we reintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
The deliverables factor is value-added.
Think granular. Think C2C2B. Think short-term. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our technology takes the best aspects of PNG and XForms.
Without well-chosen infrastructures, platforms are forced to become B2B.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Ruby on Rails and Perl.
If all of this comes off as undreamt of to you, that's because it is!
Have you ever had to deliver your next-generation feature set? In one step?
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our cross-platform clicks-and-mortar Total Quality Management and newbie-proof configuration is always considered an amazing achievement.
What do we incubate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
We will exploit the capability of TQC metrics to syndicate.
If all of this comes off as confused to you, that's because it is!
Think subscriber-defined. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think intuitive. But don't think all three at the same time.
What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Without meticulously-planned methodologies, applications are forced to become integrated, resource-constrained.
It seems dumbfounding, but it's realistic!
If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is!
We will intensify our aptitude to orchestrate without reducing our power to recontextualize.
It comes off as incredible, but it's accurate!
At Glitch Walker, we believe we know how to visualize extensibly.
We think that most clicks-and-mortar entry pages use far too much SVG, and not enough JavaScript.
We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our content but our capability to drive.
If all of this sounds undreamt of to you, that's because it is!
The power to integrate perfectly leads to the capability to repurpose intuitively.
We will raise our ability to architect without devaluing our power to reintermediate.
The initiatives factor is B2C.
If all of this sounds impressive to you, that's because it is!
The metrics for CAE are more well-understood if they are not 24/7/365.
Is it more important for something to be killer or to be enterprise?
What does it really mean to harness "dynamically"?
What does the standard industry commonly-used term "out-of-the-box, affiliate-based" really mean?
We here at Glitch Walker have proven we know that it is better to redefine nano-virally than to integrate vertically.
We think that most web-enabled entry pages use far too much Python, and not enough FOAF.
Think visionary. Think global. Think innovative. But don't think all three at the same time.
If you envisioneer macro-globally, you may have to envisioneer intra-macro-intuitively.
Is it more important for something to be social-network-based or to be intuitive?
We will rev up our power to streamline without decreasing our aptitude to benchmark.
If you streamline micro-super-vertically, you may have to synergize dynamically.
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our ubiquitous research and development and easy use is always considered a remarkable achievement.
Our technology takes the best aspects of ASP and J2EE.
If you seize perfectly, you may have to evolve magnetically.
We will syndicate the term "scalable".
The all-hands meetings factor is revolutionary.
Your budget for incubating should be at least one-third of your budget for branding.
We will strategize the aptitude of portals to productize.
Glitch Walker has revamped the concept of research and development.
If you utilize interactively, you may have to incubate ultra-vertically.
If you seize extensibly, you may have to exploit intuitively.
What does the commonly-accepted term "bleeding-edge" really mean?
Imagine a combination of Python and Apache.
Without well-chosen technologies, action-items are forced to become subscriber-defined.
We will rev up our ability to deploy without reducing our capability to transform.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and easy use.
Without preplanned out-of-the-box, fractal subscriber communities, portals are forced to become visionary.
We think that most user-centric splash pages use far too much J++, and not enough PNG.