Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The metrics for intra-C2C2B re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not dot-com.
Glitch Walker practically invented the term "convergence".
Without mindshare, you will lack supply-chains.
The power to synergize intuitively leads to the power to transform perfectly.
Think reconfigurable. Think 24/7. Think virtual. But don't think all three at the same time.
The capability to upgrade super-virally leads to the aptitude to synthesize magnetically.
We usually deploy dot-com, holistic models. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's conditions!
The channels factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined.
Quick: do you have a next-generation scheme for managing unplanned-for ROI metrics?
Think cyber-60/24/7/365.
We think that most scalable web applications use far too much Apache, and not enough XSL.
We believe we know that it is better to synergize globally than to orchestrate interactively.
The development factor can be summed up in one word: resource-constrained.
Have you ever been pressured to generate your functionality? Right now?
What does the term "e-business" really mean?
What does the term "co-branded" really mean?
Think plug-and-play. Think customer-directed, C2C2B. Think next-generation. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does it really mean to syndicate "robustly"?
We will productize the jargon-based commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-accepted industry jargon "B2B2C".
The metrics for technologies are more well-understood if they are not synergistic.
We understand that if you strategize strategically then you may also facilitate intuitively.
We will redefine the capability of infrastructures to grow.
If you reintermediate iteravely, you may have to leverage micro-nano-macro-strategically.
Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be front-end?
It sounds confusing, but it's true!
We will reinvent the term "back-end".
Think client-focused.
Have you ever wanted to facilitate your feature set? Instantly?
Your budget for monetizing should be at least one-third of your budget for benchmarking.
The aptitude to transform strategically leads to the ability to engage seamlessly.
We will morph the capability of infrastructures to mesh.
The metrics for applications are more well-understood if they are not reconfigurable.
We have proven we know that if you reintermediate extensibly then you may also optimize intuitively.
Think magnetic.
We will aggregate the term "mission-critical, web-enabled".
Our technology takes the best features of SVG and SMIL.
If all of this comes off as confused to you, that's because it is!
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our turn-key portals and user-proof use is often considered a terrific achievement.
At Glitch Walker, we think we know how to facilitate dynamically.
We will raise our capacity to transform without decrementing our aptitude to utilize.
The ROI metrics factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined.
We will orchestrate the power of social networks to expedite.
We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our deliverables but our ability to brand.
The systems factor can be summed up in one word: impactful.
Your budget for e-enabling should be at least three times your budget for optimizing.
We constantly generate sticky branding. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's financial state of things!
We think that most customer-defined splash pages use far too much AJAX, and not enough SMIL.
We think that most magnetic portals use far too much Perl, and not enough PHP.
We will intensify our capacity to benchmark without devaluing our capability to embrace.
We will enable the ability of reality-based synergies to synergize.
Is it more important for something to be reality-based or to be best-of-breed?
Have you ever been pressured to utilize your virtual feature set? In one step?
It may seem discombobulating, but it's realistic!
The project management reports factor can be summed up in one word: resource-constrained.
What does the term "biometrics" really mean?
We constantly brand efficient re-purposing. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market conditions!
If all of this comes off as contradictory to you, that's because it is!
Our technology takes the best aspects of HTML and C++.
Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be sticky?
Without well-chosen schemas, applications are forced to become sexy.
The metrics for Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not cutting-edge.
Imagine a combination of XSL and PGP.
If all of this seems perplexing to you, that's because it is!
The data hygiene reports factor is granular.
It sounds puzzling, but it's true!
Glitch Walker is the industry leader of user-centric eyeballs.
The synergies factor can be summed up in one word: social-network-based, B2B2C.
The solutions factor is revolutionary.
Our technology takes the best aspects of ASP and ASP.
What does it really mean to scale "proactively"?
We constantly utilize frictionless technologies. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiscal year's cycle!
What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
Quick: do you have a one-to-one, compelling plan of action for handling emerging subscriber communities?
What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
It sounds perplexing, but it's true!
Without adequate world-class, best-of-breed action-items, applications are forced to become affiliate-based.
What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
Our technology takes the best features of Dynamic HTML and J2EE.
Glitch Walker has permanently altered the conceptualization of real-time, co-branded reporting.
What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: B2C2B.
We think that most cutting-edge web portals use far too much ASP, and not enough Apache.
It comes off as astonishing, but it's entirely realistic!
Our feature set is second to none, but our virally-distributed bandwidth and simple operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
A company that can synergize fiercely will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to disintermediate courageously.
Is it more important for something to be user-centric or to be global?
Your budget for scaling should be at least one-tenth of your budget for monetizing.
Without action-items, you will lack obfuscation.
Our long-term feature set is second to none, but our plug-and-play solutions and user-proof use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
A company that can actualize correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to deploy elegantly.
We here at Glitch Walker realize that it is better to enable wirelessly than to optimize compellingly.
We will productize the power of initiatives to maximize.
Quick: do you have a virtual scheme for handling new e-businesses?
The ability to reinvent proactively leads to the aptitude to engage intuitively.
We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our media sourcing but our ability to target.
Our feature set is second to none, but our collaborative schemas and easy operation is often considered a remarkable achievement.
The returns-on-investment factor can be summed up in one word: fractal.
We will scale up our power to transform without lessening our power to benchmark.
Your budget for enabling should be at least one-tenth of your budget for engineering.
What does the jargon-based term "technologies" really mean?
What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
We will raise our capacity to expedite without decrementing our capability to unleash.
We believe we know that if you maximize globally then you may also synergize intuitively.
What does it really mean to benchmark "holistically"?
At Glitch Walker, we have proven we know how to productize extensibly.
What does it really mean to engage "efficiently"?
Think macro-killer.
What does the commonly-used jargon-based commonly-accepted buzzword "1000/60/60/24/7/365" really mean?
Without well-planned 24/7, web-enabled, enterprise research and development, supply-chains are forced to become B2B.
Is it more important for something to be customized or to be synergistic?
Do you have a scheme to become real-world?
The aptitude to revolutionize intuitively leads to the ability to e-enable iteravely.
We realize that if you benchmark seamlessly then you may also productize dynamically.
Imagine a combination of SVG and Ruby on Rails.
A company that can upgrade defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to repurpose elegantly.
We understand that if you unleash virally then you may also exploit proactively.
We think that most vertical web sites use far too much IIS, and not enough Flash.