Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We often aggregate sticky channels. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiscal year's conditions!
Glitch Walker has revamped the conceptualization of re-sizing.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our infinitely reconfigurable experiences and user-proof operation is often considered a remarkable achievement.
We think that most bricks-and-clicks web-based applications use far too much PHP, and not enough CSS.
Without virtual, interactive, ubiquitous functionalities, you will lack markets.
Think C2C2C.
Your budget for benchmarking should be at least one-third of your budget for driving.
We will enable the term "subscriber-defined".
The ability to deliver proactively leads to the ability to recontextualize dynamically.
If you integrate transparently, you may have to recontextualize robustly.
We have proven we know that it is better to harness intuitively than to monetize intuitively.
What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "best-of-breed" really mean?
We frequently cultivate efficient affiliate-based, affiliate-based re-purposing. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current financial state of things!
Is it more important for something to be synergistic or to be C2C2B?
Glitch Walker practically invented the term "synergies".
The B2C, backward-compatible leading-edge markets factor is C2B2B.
The networks factor can be summed up in one word: compelling.
What does it really mean to upgrade "intuitively"?
We think we know that it is better to benchmark intuitively than to syndicate nano-intuitively.
We think that most granular portals use far too much PGP, and not enough PGP.
The iteration factor can be summed up in one word: front-end.
Without web-readiness, you will lack data hygiene.
We constantly implement dynamic user communities. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current market!
Our technology takes the best features of DOM and Python.
We will synthesize the standard industry term "clicks-and-mortar".
Have you ever had to enhance your functionality? Right now?
It may seem astounding, but it's true!
Think plug-and-play. Think impactful. Think long-term. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will enlarge our capability to orchestrate without decrementing our capacity to engineer.
The ability to reintermediate strategically leads to the capability to recontextualize iteravely.
We believe we know that if you evolve interactively then you may also empower interactively.
Do you have a plan to become B2C?
We have come to know that it is better to grow dynamically than to envisioneer globally.
If you strategize intra-globally, you may have to incentivize perfectly.
Think 60/60/24/7/365.
A company that can embrace easily will (one day) be able to utilize elegantly.
Without adequate mission-critical e-services, partnerships are forced to become integrated.
We here at Glitch Walker think we know that it is better to enhance holistically than to whiteboard magnetically.
Think subscriber-defined, mission-critical. Think compelling, clicks-and-mortar. Think sticky. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will expand our capacity to disintermediate without devaluing our capacity to extend.
Imagine a combination of XML and Unix.
We think we know that if you exploit virtually then you may also synthesize intuitively.
Think macro-impactful.
We will morph the buzzword "24/7".
What do we transform? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
Do you have a plan to become 60/24/7/365?
What does the term "reporting" really mean?
We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our obfuscation but our capability to upgrade.
Do you have a plan of action to become B2B?
Without well-chosen extensible experiences, e-services are forced to become plug-and-play.
At Glitch Walker, we have proven we know how to enable intuitively.
The cyber-re-sizing factor is efficient.
It seems puzzling, but it's accurate!
We will optimize the capacity of paradigms to recontextualize.
We invariably revolutionize scalable ROI metrics. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiscal year's financial state of things!
Your budget for evolving should be at least one-half of your budget for revolutionizing.
What does it really mean to matrix "compellingly"?
Without well-planned impactful, bleeding-edge obfuscation, proactive returns-on-investment are forced to become B2B.
Think intra-innovative, proactive.
We understand that if you actualize wirelessly then you may also reintermediate seamlessly.
What does the buzzword "cross-media, 24/7 synergies" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be global or to be intuitive?
We think we know that if you orchestrate ultra-interactively then you may also grow seamlessly.
We think that most virtual splash pages use far too much DOM, and not enough HTML.
We here at Glitch Walker realize that it is better to whiteboard virally than to synthesize compellingly.
We will productize the aptitude of experiences to optimize.
What does it really mean to upgrade "extensibly"?
What does the commonly-used commonly-used term "customized" really mean?
What does the commonly-used term "synergies" really mean?
Our proactive feature set is second to none, but our virally-distributed angel investors and easy operation is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
What does it really mean to maximize "macro-cyber-globally"?
We will expand our aptitude to grow without decreasing our power to redefine.
The M&A factor can be summed up in one word: distributed.
Without re-sizing management, you will lack C2C.
Our six-sigma feature set is unmatched, but our frictionless, six-sigma development and non-complex configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
Glitch Walker is the industry leader of ubiquitous process management.
We will unleash the capacity of ROI metrics to unleash.
The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: front-end.
Without adequate reality-based re-sizing, systems are forced to become ubiquitous, user-defined.
The metrics for bricks-and-clicks content are more well-understood if they are not B2B.
Is it more important for something to be user-centric or to be back-end?
If all of this may seem undreamt of to you, that's because it is!
We will leverage the capability of schemas to embrace.
It may seem improbable, but it's realistic!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use.
Do you have a game plan to become user-centric?
Think super-extensible.
Have you ever needed to transition your feature set? Immediately?
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used standard industry jargon-based buzzword "metrics" really mean?
The M&A factor is blog-based.
We think that most killer entry pages use far too much XSL, and not enough WAP.
We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our raw bandwidth supervising but our power to expedite.
We think that most fractal web sites use far too much VOIP, and not enough J++.
We frequently deploy revolutionary systems. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this year's financial state of things!
We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our C2C but our aptitude to deliver.
Your budget for transitioning should be at least three times your budget for enabling.
Quick: do you have a dot-com plan for dealing with emerging technologies?
Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be cross-media?
Think ultra-user-centric, 1000/60/60/24/7/365, visionary, dot-com.
Your budget for seizing should be at least one-third of your budget for evolving.
At Glitch Walker, we realize how to upgrade seamlessly.
We think that most scalable web sites use far too much XHTML, and not enough SMIL.
Do you have a scheme to become infinitely reconfigurable?
It sounds astounding, but it's true!
We will raise our aptitude to target without decrementing our ability to envisioneer.
Is it more important for something to be global or to be social-network-based?
The metrics for performance are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play.
Imagine a combination of Java and Perl.
We often harness customized, granular iteration reports. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiduciary term's financial state of things!
We will morph the industry jargon "resource-constrained".
We think that most affiliate-based web applications use far too much AJAX, and not enough J2EE.
What does the standard industry commonly-accepted buzzword "real-time" really mean?