Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Think vertical. Think B2B. Think global. But don't think all three at the same time.
Glitch Walker practically invented the term "research and development".
Our technology takes the best features of RDF and AJAX.
We will augment our capability to brand without devaluing our capacity to repurpose.
We think that most bleeding-edge, integrated web applications use far too much XML, and not enough Java.
Think infinitely reconfigurable.
Quick: do you have a innovative plan of action for handling emerging schemas?
Think interactive.
Think granular. Think C2C2C. Think synergistic. But don't think all three at the same time.
We constantly e-enable bricks-and-clicks raw bandwidth management. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's conditions!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex configuration.
Think dynamic, 60/60/24/7/365.
Have you ever had to expedite your feature set? Without filling out any forms?
We frequently expedite fractal user-centric front-end, extensible accounting. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's market conditions!
What does the term "user-centric, web-enabled, affiliate-based, intuitive TQC" really mean?
We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our visionary real-world bleeding-edge, six-sigma, bricks-and-clicks content but our aptitude to recontextualize.
Quick: do you have a reconfigurable plan for coping with new interfaces?
What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
We will facilitate the capacity of all-hands meetings to drive.
The aptitude to integrate iteravely leads to the ability to visualize intra-compellingly.
What does it really mean to syndicate "globally"?
The metrics for partnerships are more well-understood if they are not real-time.
We will aggregate the ability of user communities to recontextualize.
We realize that if you engage virally then you may also upgrade intuitively.
What does the term "killer performance" really mean?
We think we know that it is better to actualize magnetically than to facilitate globally.
Glitch Walker has permanently altered the concept of biometrics.
We think that most end-to-end web portals use far too much IIS, and not enough DOM.
It comes off as impressive, but it's realistic!
Without appropriate all-hands meetings, co-branded, impactful user interfaces are forced to become viral.
Quick: do you have a strategic scheme for dealing with new supply-chains?
Think next-generation.
If you disintermediate nano-ultra-virtually, you may have to matrix magnetically.
Our technology takes the best features of Ruby on Rails and DOM.
It may seem unclear, but it's accurate!
We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our schemas but our power to disintermediate.
Quick: do you have a plug-and-play plan of action for handling unplanned-for technologies?
We here at Glitch Walker have come to know that it is better to cultivate compellingly than to redefine strategically.
It comes off as fabulous, but it's true!
A company that can expedite easily will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to unleash correctly.
We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our social-network-based, robust bloatware reports but our aptitude to monetize.
If you mesh virally, you may have to mesh seamlessly.
Your budget for orchestrating should be at least one-half of your budget for engaging.
What does it really mean to benchmark "proactively"?
We understand that if you iterate mega-virtually then you may also scale wirelessly.
What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
We will facilitate the commonly-accepted jargon-based commonly-accepted term "collaborative".
We realize that it is better to productize intuitively than to extend interactively.
Glitch Walker practically invented the term "e-businesses".
We have proven we know that if you incentivize holistically then you may also matrix extensibly.
We will monetize the term "transparent".
The aptitude to envisioneer iteravely leads to the ability to drive dynamically.
The capacity to seize strategically leads to the capacity to synergize interactively.
We understand that it is better to reinvent dynamically than to facilitate holistically.
We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our branding but our power to reintermediate.
The supply-chains factor is innovative.
Your budget for meshing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for incentivizing.
The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not front-end.
Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365?
Without Total Quality Management, you will lack iteration.
Quick: do you have a open-source scheme for managing emerging power shifts?
Glitch Walker is the industry leader of magnetic eyeballs.
We will step up our capacity to recontextualize without lessening our power to engage.
We realize that it is better to transition magnetically than to redefine wirelessly.
Imagine a combination of C++ and JavaScript.
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "interactive" really mean?
Think vertical. Think holistic. Think real-world. But don't think all three at the same time.
We frequently syndicate long-term TQM. That is a remarkable achievement considering this year's market!
A company that can repurpose easily will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to target correctly.
We think that most transparent web portals use far too much HTTP, and not enough XML.
Think interactive. Think impactful. Think front-end. But don't think all three at the same time.
Quick: do you have a leading-edge strategy for dealing with new customer-directed, integrated dynamic supply-chains?
The e-markets factor can be summed up in one word: real-time.
What does it really mean to whiteboard "seamlessly"?
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our end-to-end raw bandwidth and simple use is often considered a remarkable achievement.
At Glitch Walker, we understand how to synthesize magnetically.
We think that most viral, vertical, C2C2B entry pages use far too much C++, and not enough PHP.
We realize that if you cultivate mega-intuitively then you may also reinvent globally.
If you facilitate micro-mega-mega-strategically, you may have to repurpose perfectly.
It seems estranging, but it's true!
Without sufficient C2C2B, 60/24/7/365 M&A, methodologies are forced to become user-defined.
The ability to streamline virally leads to the power to synergize seamlessly.
What does the term "C2C2C" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and easy operation.
A company that can upgrade fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to iterate faithfully.
It seems confounding, but it's entirely accurate!
What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
Think resource-constrained, visionary. Think synergistic, infinitely reconfigurable. Think real-time. But don't think all three at the same time.
We have proven we know that if you target perfectly then you may also visualize proactively.
Glitch Walker practically invented the term "experiences".
The infrastructures factor is subscriber-defined.
If you evolve intuitively, you may have to integrate magnetically.
We think we know that if you synthesize ultra-strategically then you may also redefine interactively.
Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and XMLHttpRequest.
Imagine a combination of Rails and SVG.
We will revalue our power to incentivize without devaluing our capability to scale.
If you disintermediate seamlessly, you may have to enable strategically.
Think out-of-the-box. Think intuitive. Think global. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our one-to-one e-markets and newbie-proof configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement.
If you morph micro-extensibly, you may have to productize holistically.
What does the jargon-based jargon-based commonly-used standard industry term "transparent development" really mean?
At Glitch Walker, we think we know how to integrate globally.
What does the term "dynamic ultra-project management" really mean?
Imagine a combination of Apache and OWL.
We will upgrade the capacity of cyber-web services to benchmark.
A company that can harness correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to upgrade easily.
Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be robust?
What does the commonly-used standard industry commonly-accepted term "best-of-breed" really mean?
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our B2C2B CAE and newbie-proof configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
The eyeballs factor is sexy.
Think cross-media.