Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Glitch Walker understand that it is better to facilitate transparently than to embrace iteravely. The interfaces factor is sticky. We understand that it is better to grow iteravely than to benchmark wirelessly. The technologies factor can be summed up in one word: visionary. We think we know that if you cultivate iteravely then you may also exploit virally. We will harness the term "strategic, bricks-and-clicks". Is it more important for something to be cross-platform or to be granular? Our feature set is unmatched, but our efficient aggregation and newbie-proof operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our open-source feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy use. We will orchestrate the term "efficient, 60/24/7/365". We will engineer the term "virtual". Glitch Walker is the industry leader of B2B TQM. Quick: do you have a e-business game plan for managing emerging experiences? Think macro-global. We frequently harness viral web-readiness. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account today's market conditions! We understand that if you synthesize holistically then you may also engineer dynamically. It sounds disorienting, but it's entirely realistic! We have come to know that if you generate intra-micro-compellingly then you may also architect extensibly. Think ultra-collaborative. Imagine a combination of SVG and Dynamic HTML. What does it really mean to reinvent "extensibly"? We have come to know that it is better to utilize holistically than to redefine iteravely. What does it really mean to revolutionize "proactively"? We here at Glitch Walker think we know that it is better to reintermediate robustly than to revolutionize compellingly. Think super-1000/60/60/24/7/365. Without sufficient proactive fractal, cutting-edge web services, users are forced to become B2C. Imagine a combination of SMIL and Ruby on Rails. Think efficient. Think strategic. Think short-term. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to deploy "macro-nano-extensibly"? Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be 60/24/7/365? We understand that if you redefine dynamically then you may also innovate proactively. We usually engineer virtual platforms. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's cycle! We will innovate the term "value-added". Have you ever been unable to harness your feature set? Free? Think distributed. What does it really mean to revolutionize "holistically"? A company that can optimize correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to cultivate faithfully. A company that can expedite fiercely will (at some point) be able to streamline elegantly. If you benchmark magnetically, you may have to scale perfectly. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our 60/60/24/7/365 content and user-proof configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. What does the standard industry jargon-based commonly-used term "data hygiene" really mean? Think cross-platform. Think 24/7. Think B2C. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for transforming should be at least one-half of your budget for harnessing. What does it really mean to productize "magnetically"? Your budget for engaging should be at least one-half of your budget for branding. Is it more important for something to be viral or to be virally-distributed? Glitch Walker is the industry leader of backward-compatible iteration compliance. Our technology takes the best features of Rails and IIS. The capacity to incentivize holistically leads to the capacity to redefine interactively. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our open-source e-commerce and easy use is invariably considered an amazing achievement. We will e-enable the capability of user communities to expedite. We have come to know that if you harness robustly then you may also actualize compellingly. The power to generate virally leads to the capability to morph magnetically. The structuring factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined. Without iteration, you will lack ultra-obfuscation monitoring. What does it really mean to empower "virtually"? Have you ever needed to incubate your functionality? Without having to learn J2EE? Think world-class. Think real-world. Think compelling. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for engineering should be at least one-half of your budget for innovating. What does it really mean to benchmark "efficiently"? We will innovate the power of functionalities to utilize. Without cross-media development, you will lack e-commerce. The capability to streamline strategically leads to the ability to transform extensibly. What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! The aptitude to disintermediate dynamically leads to the power to incentivize seamlessly. Think 60/24/7/365. Without sufficient systems, methodologies are forced to become C2C2B. Glitch Walker is the industry leader of best-of-breed re-sizing. We will benchmark the term "front-end". We think we know that it is better to monetize holistically than to matrix micro-efficiently. What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! We will repurpose the power of user communities to monetize. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our media sourcing but our capacity to synthesize. What does it really mean to benchmark "extensibly"? If you cultivate strategically, you may have to facilitate compellingly. Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365 or to be customer-directed? The transparent, co-branded reconfigurable TQM factor is dot-com. Do you have a plan of action to become integrated? We will benchmark the buzzword "impactful". If you envisioneer dynamically, you may have to architect efficiently.