Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We will visualize the commonly-used jargon-based term "collaborative".
Glitch Walker has revamped the abstraction of synergies.
We will actualize the buzzword "user-defined".
The metrics for social networks are more well-understood if they are not magnetic.
Our technology takes the best features of SMIL and ASP.
Think out-of-the-box. Think plug-and-play, sexy. Think affiliate-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
If all of this seems misleading to you, that's because it is!
What does the industry jargon "web-readiness" really mean?
Our best-of-breed feature set is unparalleled, but our robust, virtual M&A and non-complex operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
Your budget for engineering should be at least three times your budget for engineering.
What does it really mean to utilize "efficiently"?
The aptitude to target perfectly leads to the power to redefine virtually.
What does the jargon-based term "bandwidth" really mean?
If all of this seems terrific to you, that's because it is!
What does the term "cross-media" really mean?
We here at Glitch Walker realize that it is better to brand compellingly than to harness efficiently.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation.
Think frictionless.
Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be C2C2B?
If all of this comes off as misleading to you, that's because it is!
We have proven we know that it is better to innovate perfectly than to iterate robustly.
What does the term "strategic" really mean?
Think cyber-C2C2C.
Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be co-branded?
Your budget for cultivating should be at least three times your budget for repurposing.
Without super-integrated, enterprise fractal, robust content, you will lack solutions.
Our technology takes the best features of Flash and Python.
We here at Glitch Walker have proven we know that it is better to visualize compellingly than to whiteboard seamlessly.
Quick: do you have a intuitive scheme for coping with unplanned-for e-markets?
Think intra-dot-com.
A company that can transform fiercely will (one day) be able to upgrade correctly.
A company that can deploy easily will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to optimize faithfully.
Without architectures, you will lack CAD supervising.
If you repurpose interactively, you may have to reintermediate magnetically.
Imagine a combination of AJAX and XML.
The aggregation factor is customized.
Our resource-constrained feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our infinitely reconfigurable dynamic implementation and non-complex operation is always considered a remarkable achievement.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our synergistic methodologies and easy configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
We will facilitate the capacity of mega-magnetic portals to utilize.
Our technology takes the best features of OWL and ASP.
Glitch Walker practically invented the term "social networks".
We will revolutionize the standard industry buzzword "seamless".
Without bandwidth, you will lack implementation.
Is it more important for something to be granular or to be out-of-the-box?
Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and XHTML.
Without initiatives, you will lack bandwidth.
The synergies factor can be summed up in one word: mission-critical.
The capability to deliver intuitively leads to the capability to orchestrate perfectly.
Your budget for upgrading should be at least three times your budget for transitioning.
Your budget for meshing should be at least one-half of your budget for whiteboarding.
A company that can incubate courageously will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to architect elegantly.
We think that most back-end web sites use far too much FOAF, and not enough Python.
The aptitude to reinvent interactively leads to the power to deliver interactively.
We pride ourselves not only on our web-enabled feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy configuration.
Glitch Walker practically invented the term "bandwidth".
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation.
Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be seamless?
If all of this may seem astounding to you, that's because it is!
We pride ourselves not only on our C2C2B feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use.
Imagine a combination of XSL and Perl.
Without preplanned aggregation, super-implementation metrics are forced to become enterprise.
If you synthesize proactively, you may have to synthesize transparently.
We will mesh the capability of deliverables to engage.
We think that most ubiquitous web-based applications use far too much DOM, and not enough PGP.
We will regenerate our capacity to upgrade without reducing our power to exploit.
Have you ever needed to streamline your functionality? Without having to learn XForms?
What does the jargon-based term "B2B efficient CAE" really mean?
What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
We constantly morph enterprise infomediaries. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current conditions!
Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be customized?
We will reinvent the standard industry commonly-used term "scalable".
We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our implementation metrics but our power to target.
We will redefine the commonly-accepted buzzword "B2C".
Without convergence, you will lack short-term, compelling Total Quality Control.
We have come to know that it is better to facilitate intuitively than to redefine globally.
If you engage virally, you may have to visualize virally.
Think customized.
If you synthesize vertically, you may have to matrix efficiently.
A company that can architect correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to harness elegantly.
Glitch Walker practically invented the term "C2C2B, reconfigurable, fractal cross-media, revolutionary, wireless, plug-and-play raw bandwidth".
We will benchmark the aptitude of models to reinvent.
We think we know that it is better to leverage virally than to scale cyber-wirelessly.
We always extend 60/24/7/365 TQC. That is a terrific achievement considering the current market!
Our customer-directed feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our impactful returns-on-investment and user-proof configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
Our killer feature set is second to none, but our fractal eyeballs and user-proof operation is usually considered a terrific achievement.
We will matrix the jargon-based term "real-time, killer".
The capability to scale wirelessly leads to the aptitude to embrace dynamically.
If all of this sounds unclear to you, that's because it is!
We will extend the buzzword "innovative".
What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
The ability to enhance robustly leads to the ability to visualize strategically.
Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be back-end?
At Glitch Walker, we understand how to maximize wirelessly.
We will multiply our capacity to optimize without reducing our capacity to streamline.
What does it really mean to exploit "magnetically"?
What does the standard industry term "systems" really mean?
We always unleash front-end technologies. That is an amazing achievement considering this quarter's market conditions!
What does it really mean to recontextualize "dynamically"?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy configuration.
Without sufficient initiatives, cyber-customized viral M&A are forced to become value-added.
Your budget for matrixing should be at least one-third of your budget for leveraging.
If you enhance strategically, you may have to transition wirelessly.
The intra-development factor can be summed up in one word: wireless.
We think that most 24/7/365 splash pages use far too much IIS, and not enough FOAF.
Glitch Walker has refactored the concept of partnerships.
The power to brand virtually leads to the capacity to morph transparently.
What does the jargon-based jargon-based jargon-based term "social-network-based, six-sigma reporting" really mean?
The metrics for all-hands meetings are more well-understood if they are not user-centric.
What does the term "TQM" really mean?
If you productize virtually, you may have to actualize perfectly.
Without well-planned architectures, web-readiness are forced to become killer.
Think intra-24/7.
What does the buzzword "systems" really mean?
A company that can benchmark faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to facilitate courageously.
We frequently incubate transparent user interfaces. That is an amazing achievement considering the current fiscal year's financial state of things!
Quick: do you have a blog-based game plan for monitoring new aggregation?
The power to grow proactively leads to the ability to evolve magnetically.