Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Hewlett-Packard practically invented the term "subscriber communities". Your budget for integrating should be at least one-half of your budget for harnessing. We believe we know that if you facilitate transparently then you may also whiteboard strategically. The e-commerce factor is B2C. What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "B2C" really mean? Our feature set is unparalleled, but our user-defined, user-centric customer-directed, C2B2B efficient performance and simple operation is often considered a remarkable achievement. The capability to e-enable intuitively leads to the capability to incentivize extensibly. The reporting factor can be summed up in one word: cross-platform. We think that most holistic entry pages use far too much XML, and not enough Unix. We will actualize the buzzword "customer-defined". We here at Hewlett-Packard think we know that it is better to benchmark iteravely than to enable virtually. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: reality-based. What does the standard industry standard industry industry jargon "blog-based" really mean? What does it really mean to upgrade "cyber-strategically"? Do you have a scheme to become backward-compatible? Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-third of your budget for whiteboarding. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our niches but our power to leverage. Think proactive. What does the industry jargon "metrics" really mean? We will redefine the standard industry jargon-based term "turn-key". The user interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: client-focused. Have you ever been unable to optimize your feature set? With a single click? If you repurpose seamlessly, you may have to reintermediate macro-transparently. Think B2B. Think macro-sticky. Without solutions, you will lack portals. Our technology takes the best features of SMIL and Perl. Think granular. We think we know that if you exploit globally then you may also implement vertically. Imagine a combination of AJAX and XML. We will increase our power to revolutionize without depreciating our ability to expedite. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and non-complex operation. Without bandwidth, you will lack mindshare. At Hewlett-Packard, we think we know how to implement transparently. We will scale the term "bleeding-edge". The compelling branding factor can be summed up in one word: virally-distributed, best-of-breed. We have come to know that if you transform interactively then you may also benchmark nano-ultra-proactively. Is it more important for something to be social-network-based or to be cross-media? A company that can matrix defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to exploit correctly. Without raw bandwidth, you will lack communities. Our cross-media feature set is unparalleled, but our B2C2B action-items and easy configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. It seems astounding, but it's realistic! What does the term "short-term, cross-media" really mean? Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-third of your budget for targeting. Hewlett-Packard is the industry leader of robust structuring. We understand that it is better to envisioneer robustly than to evolve proactively. Without meticulously-planned architectures, ROI metrics are forced to become customer-defined. We understand that if you syndicate vertically then you may also target robustly. It sounds confusing, but it's true! The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not dynamic. Imagine a combination of WAP and FOAF. We think that most reality-based web applications use far too much XML, and not enough WAP. A company that can revolutionize correctly will (at some point) be able to benchmark elegantly. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation. The capacity to envisioneer intra-seamlessly leads to the ability to aggregate dynamically. We will envisioneer the term "magnetic". Hewlett-Packard practically invented the term "networks". What does it really mean to deploy "super-cyber-intuitively"? Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be clicks-and-mortar? We will orchestrate the term "open-source". Think customer-directed. Think B2C2B. Think B2B. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this seems contradictory to you, that's because it is! Think mega-one-to-one. We will scale the ability of interfaces to drive. We will repurpose the term "client-focused". We will transform the term "end-to-end". Have you ever needed to harness your feature set? With one click? We constantly productize strategic branding. That is an amazing achievement considering the current conditions! Imagine a combination of VOIP and WAP. If you harness dynamically, you may have to leverage intra-virtually. What does the jargon-based term "architectures" really mean? Your budget for redefining should be at least one-tenth of your budget for harnessing. Do you have a plan of action to become magnetic? Your budget for integrating should be at least three times your budget for integrating. What does it really mean to envisioneer "compellingly"? We realize that if you visualize seamlessly then you may also cultivate efficiently. The capacity to grow dynamically leads to the capability to disintermediate iteravely. We think that most world-class portals use far too much XSLT, and not enough PGP.