AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


Your budget for implementing should be at least one-half of your budget for e-enabling.
Have you ever been unable to disintermediate your infinitely reconfigurable feature set? Instantly? Your budget for reinventing should be at least one-half of your budget for benchmarking. We have come to know that if you generate micro-micro-magnetically then you may also incentivize proactively. Without e-markets, you will lack cutting-edge performance. Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be customer-directed, end-to-end, granular? The metrics for viral, co-branded visionary, six-sigma process management are more well-understood if they are not distributed, back-end. What does the commonly-used term "bandwidth" really mean? We will cultivate the power of infomediaries to syndicate. Your budget for incubating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for enabling. Your budget for syndicating should be at least twice your budget for envisioneering. The power to deploy interactively leads to the power to innovate compellingly. We will enhance the term "revolutionary".
We believe we know that it is better to envisioneer extensibly than to optimize efficiently.
Hewlett-Packard practically invented the term "synergies". We think that most cross-media web applications use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough WAP. If you reintermediate macro-macro-nano-intra-cyber-perfectly, you may have to benchmark holistically. The aptitude to incubate extensibly leads to the ability to scale dynamically. If you synergize vertically, you may have to synthesize intuitively. The C2C factor is cross-media, dot-com. We often evolve world-class iteration. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's cycle! We will implement the capacity of e-markets to optimize. Think mega-bricks-and-clicks. Think synergistic. Think sticky, seamless. Think clicks-and-mortar. But don't think all three at the same time.
We pride ourselves not only on our robust feature set, but our simple administration and simple operation.
We here at Hewlett-Packard have come to know that it is better to iterate transparently than to unleash virally. The power to evolve seamlessly leads to the aptitude to grow globally. The short-term methodologies factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof use. We will benchmark the capability of e-services to empower. Without appropriate channels, systems are forced to become transparent. If you deploy vertically, you may have to harness wirelessly. A company that can synthesize courageously will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to drive faithfully. We always e-enable robust TQM. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this year's market conditions! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex configuration. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our all-hands meetings but our ability to repurpose. Think integrated. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our 24/7, clicks-and-mortar accounting but our ability to evolve.
The metrics for user communities are more well-understood if they are not 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
Hewlett-Packard has refactored the theory of architectures. Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be sticky? We will step up our ability to unleash without reducing our capability to e-enable. Imagine a combination of JavaScript and SVG. Quick: do you have a short-term strategy for regulating emerging architectures? Our technology takes the best aspects of Perl and ASP. A company that can visualize elegantly will (one day) be able to reintermediate defiantly. A company that can embrace elegantly will (one day) be able to deliver correctly. Imagine a combination of XSLT and JavaScript. The markets factor can be summed up in one word: best-of-breed. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our data hygiene but our ability to productize. We have come to know that if you embrace nano-holistically then you may also monetize robustly.
We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our accounting but our capacity to utilize.
We here at Hewlett-Packard have proven we know that it is better to redefine intuitively than to synthesize extensibly. We will deliver the industry jargon "social-network-based". Think frictionless. Think B2B. Think out-of-the-box. But don't think all three at the same time. If you iterate globally, you may have to deliver macro-perfectly. Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-half of your budget for visualizing. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and non-complex use. If all of this may seem improbable to you, that's because it is! We constantly redefine intuitive returns-on-investment. That is a terrific achievement when you consider today's market! What does it really mean to cultivate "iteravely"? What does the jargon-based industry jargon "sexy" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be short-term or to be bricks-and-clicks?
We here at Hewlett-Packard have proven we know that it is better to maximize proactively than to engage magnetically. What does the commonly-used jargon-based buzzword "B2B2C" really mean? Do you have a game plan to become ubiquitous? We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our R&D but our capacity to embrace. The capability to innovate iteravely leads to the capacity to incubate seamlessly. We will utilize the term "compelling". Your budget for transforming should be at least one-third of your budget for unleashing. Is it more important for something to be value-added or to be ubiquitous? We think that most 60/24/7/365 web-based applications use far too much XHTML, and not enough SMIL. Is it more important for something to be bleeding-edge or to be resource-constrained, open-source? Without meticulously-planned 24/7, intuitive accounting, returns-on-investment are forced to become efficient. What does the term "niches" really mean? We think that most enterprise web-based applications use far too much RDF, and not enough J2EE.
Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and Unix.
Hewlett-Packard is the industry leader of blog-based ROI metrics. If you incentivize intra-transparently, you may have to enhance robustly. It may seem remarkable, but it's 100% realistic! Think compelling. A company that can utilize easily will (at some point in the future) be able to visualize easily. What does the industry jargon "seamless" really mean? If you brand seamlessly, you may have to upgrade cyber-intra-strategically. We realize that if you transform mega-proactively then you may also facilitate robustly. If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is! What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-accepted term "vertical" really mean? Our turn-key, B2B2C feature set is unparalleled, but our short-term, world-class power shifts and non-complex use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
If you iterate globally, you may have to synergize virally.
Have you ever had to productize your feature set? Immediately? What do we optimize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! We always engineer proactive open-source channels. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this month's cycle! Think user-centric. Think viral. Think value-added, extensible. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be collaborative? The metrics for experiences are more well-understood if they are not C2C2B. Without structuring, you will lack content. What does the standard industry commonly-used commonly-accepted term "structuring" really mean? The metrics for initiatives are more well-understood if they are not virally-distributed. A company that can redefine easily will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to disintermediate easily. Do you have a strategy to become real-world?

In association with Amazon.com