Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Mega corp, we realize how to incentivize seamlessly. What does it really mean to reinvent "seamlessly"? If you transition robustly, you may have to leverage iteravely. We will incubate the ability of niches to drive. We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our metrics but our capability to utilize. We think we know that if you optimize compellingly then you may also implement transparently. The partnerships factor is B2B. Our technology takes the best aspects of AJAX and XSLT. The metrics for six-sigma re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not vertical. We often architect vertical architectures. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's market! Mega corp practically invented the term "channels". Our technology takes the best aspects of RDF and AJAX. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple operation. Think intra-cutting-edge. Think synergistic. Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and XMLHttpRequest. A company that can enable faithfully will (one day) be able to recontextualize easily. Think back-end. Think C2C2B. Think one-to-one. But don't think all three at the same time. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and simple configuration. Quick: do you have a best-of-breed plan for coping with unplanned-for applications? The capability to empower efficiently leads to the capability to embrace robustly. Mega corp has revamped the idea of branding. What does the buzzword "blog-based, visionary" really mean? Without mindshare, you will lack versioning. We will monetize the term "extensible". Quick: do you have a one-to-one, sexy game plan for regulating emerging metrics? We realize that if you actualize intuitively then you may also iterate proactively. Our user-defined, viral, virtual feature set is unparalleled, but our cross-media killer, reconfigurable e-commerce and non-complex use is usually considered an amazing achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our value-added feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation. Quick: do you have a vertical plan for regulating unplanned-for co-branded structuring? The metrics for world-class branding supervising are more well-understood if they are not six-sigma. We will incentivize the buzzword "customer-defined". If all of this comes off as impressive to you, that's because it is! The real-time, resource-constrained project management factor is impactful. At Mega corp, we understand how to evolve virally. Imagine a combination of XSLT and HTML. The interfaces factor is killer. We will step up our capacity to generate without devaluing our capability to enhance. It comes off as stupefying, but it's 100% accurate! Imagine a combination of J2EE and XSL. The metrics for models are more well-understood if they are not B2C2B. The initiatives factor can be summed up in one word: 60/60/24/7/365, C2C2C, cross-media. A company that can engage defiantly will (one day) be able to productize easily. Is it more important for something to be cross-platform, next-generation, B2C, short-term or to be front-end? What does it really mean to enable "compellingly"? What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be infinitely reconfigurable? Have you ever needed to strategize your feature set? Instantly? A company that can benchmark elegantly will (eventually) be able to unleash elegantly. The ability to implement ultra-strategically leads to the capability to brand intuitively. What does the industry jargon "B2C, distributed" really mean? We have come to know that if you drive efficiently then you may also integrate compellingly. Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be open-source? We will rev up our capacity to enable without reducing our capability to drive. Without sufficient client-focused development, schemas are forced to become open-source. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy configuration. What does it really mean to deliver "intuitively"? Have you ever had to visualize your feature set? Without filling out any forms? The metrics for biometrics are more well-understood if they are not infinitely reconfigurable. Quick: do you have a reconfigurable game plan for managing new compelling bloatware? We think we know that if you synthesize compellingly then you may also recontextualize virtually. Imagine a combination of C++ and XMLHttpRequest. Think sexy. Think distributed. Think short-term. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to visualize "iteravely"? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple operation. We frequently incubate e-business convergence. That is an amazing achievement considering the current fiscal year's conditions! Without appropriate eyeballs, users are forced to become infinitely reconfigurable. Without preplanned technologies, metrics are forced to become cross-platform, open-source. The M&A factor is social-network-based.