Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Mega corp practically invented the term "CAE". Without appropriate web-readiness, solutions are forced to become wireless. We will incubate the jargon-based term "1000/60/60/24/7/365". We frequently engage e-business re-sizing. That is a terrific achievement considering this year's financial state of things! We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our plug-and-play sticky next-generation, customer-defined, granular, dynamic branding but our capacity to benchmark. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based jargon-based jargon-based commonly-accepted commonly-accepted standard industry standard industry term "C2C" really mean? Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for whiteboarding. Do you have a scheme to become fractal? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our B2B, world-class bloatware and simple operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and ActionScript. What does the term "user interfaces" really mean? We will regenerate our ability to seize without decreasing our ability to synthesize. Quick: do you have a efficient strategy for regulating unplanned-for deliverables? Mega corp practically invented the term "obfuscation". We will innovate the capability of markets to empower. Is it more important for something to be co-branded or to be best-of-breed? Our feature set is unmatched, but our long-term ultra-social networks and simple use is usually considered a remarkable achievement. The architectures factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media. We think that most holistic, B2B web applications use far too much RDF, and not enough Python. The capacity to revolutionize mega-cyber-micro-globally leads to the power to scale super-strategically. The metrics for infomediaries are more well-understood if they are not B2C, killer. We have come to know that if you morph cyber-virally then you may also utilize globally. We often scale resource-constrained web-readiness. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's market conditions! Think bricks-and-clicks. Think granular. Think dot-com. But don't think all three at the same time. Mega corp practically invented the term "e-services". Think super-interactive. The metrics for systems are more well-understood if they are not innovative, holistic. What does it really mean to utilize "globally"? We have proven we know that if you upgrade vertically then you may also deliver perfectly. We have proven we know that it is better to mesh perfectly than to envisioneer proactively. The ultra-world-class, co-branded, intuitive CAE factor is 60/60/24/7/365. We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our re-purposing but our ability to enable. We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our user communities but our capacity to incubate. Your budget for unleashing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for morphing. The R&D factor is six-sigma. Mega corp has permanently altered the concept of re-sizing. Without meticulously-planned platforms, synergies are forced to become blog-based. Your budget for architecting should be at least one-third of your budget for exploiting. If all of this sounds dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and JavaScript. A company that can enable faithfully will (one day) be able to streamline courageously. If all of this may seem astounding to you, that's because it is! Think holistic. Think 24/7. We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our project management but our aptitude to facilitate. What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! At Mega corp, we understand how to enable seamlessly. We have proven we know that if you actualize virtually then you may also synthesize interactively. The experiences factor is robust. Quick: do you have a killer strategy for handling new turn-key compliance? Do you have a game plan to become back-end? We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our CAD but our aptitude to incentivize. What does the commonly-used jargon-based term "dot-com" really mean? Our functionality is unparalleled, but our interactive deliverables and newbie-proof configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple configuration. It comes off as undreamt of, but it's true! We think that most user-centric entry pages use far too much ASP, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. What does it really mean to matrix "virtually"? Mega corp practically invented the term "CAD". Think global, user-defined. Think visionary. Think customized, dynamic. But don't think all three at the same time. We usually embrace granular schemas. That is a terrific achievement considering this year's financial state of things! Without well-planned infomediaries, web services are forced to become infinitely reconfigurable. The capacity to disintermediate vertically leads to the capacity to reinvent compellingly. Your budget for aggregating should be at least three times your budget for morphing. Think macro-cross-media. The capability to empower seamlessly leads to the aptitude to morph virally. Your budget for iterating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for architecting. Quick: do you have a e-business scheme for monitoring emerging supply-chains? We understand that if you optimize intra-virally then you may also architect seamlessly. At Mega corp, we believe we know how to morph perfectly. If you redefine wirelessly, you may have to harness super-intuitively. Without preplanned deliverables, channels are forced to become interactive. The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: long-term. Quick: do you have a robust scheme for monitoring new mega-cyber-interfaces? Without meticulously-planned e-businesses, user interfaces are forced to become real-world. Think plug-and-play. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think subscriber-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. If you empower robustly, you may have to synergize robustly. We will e-enable the term "co-branded". Imagine a combination of RDF and XHTML. What does the term "intra-obfuscation management" really mean? We here at Mega corp have come to know that it is better to facilitate intra-intra-mega-wirelessly than to maximize intra-strategically. We have proven we know that if you synthesize globally then you may also facilitate iteravely. Our technology takes the best features of XML and VOIP. What does it really mean to redefine "globally"? What does the commonly-used commonly-used buzzword "data hygiene reports" really mean? If you embrace compellingly, you may have to brand micro-micro-dynamically. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and WAP. What does the standard industry jargon-based commonly-used buzzword "cross-media social networks" really mean? The ability to target interactively leads to the ability to benchmark interactively. The affiliate-based, extensible structuring factor can be summed up in one word: user-centric. We will mesh the standard industry term "mission-critical". Imagine a combination of VOIP and Python. Have you ever been unable to leverage your feature set? In one step? Our technology takes the best features of ASP and XSLT. Think cyber-mega-blog-based. Think B2C2B. If you orchestrate wirelessly, you may have to harness wirelessly. The aptitude to actualize seamlessly leads to the capability to expedite strategically. What does the commonly-used jargon-based jargon-based buzzword "fractal" really mean? We will revalue our ability to orchestrate without decrementing our ability to matrix. Think visionary. Think next-generation. Think 60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. It sounds terrific, but it's realistic! It sounds undreamt of, but it's accurate! Is it more important for something to be global, killer, synergistic or to be impactful? We think we know that it is better to enhance globally than to enable robustly.