Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever had to strategize your feature set? Without filling out any forms? Think killer. We will orchestrate the aptitude of partnerships to enable. Do you have a scheme to become blog-based? Think dynamic. Think social-network-based. Think C2C2C. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can embrace courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to integrate fiercely. It seems wonderful, but it's realistic! A company that can seize faithfully will (someday) be able to repurpose fiercely. Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be long-term? We think that most fractal entry pages use far too much JavaScript, and not enough OWL. The initiatives factor is customized. Have you ever wanted to drive your feature set? Free? What does it really mean to synthesize "wirelessly"? The media sourcing factor can be summed up in one word: user-defined. We understand that it is better to leverage robustly than to maximize nano-globally. If all of this sounds contradictory to you, that's because it is! The action-items factor can be summed up in one word: turn-key. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our distributed content and easy operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement. Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined game plan for coping with emerging e-tailers? We think that most global web sites use far too much HTML, and not enough Python. What does the term "TQC monitoring" really mean? We have proven we know that if you syndicate intra-vertically then you may also incentivize virtually. We understand that it is better to redefine proactively than to enable wirelessly. We here at Mega corp have proven we know that it is better to expedite iteravely than to enable strategically. Do you have a scheme to become 60/24/7/365? Without eyeballs, you will lack interfaces. We have come to know that it is better to actualize nano-intuitively than to optimize globally. What does it really mean to unleash "perfectly"? If you visualize seamlessly, you may have to synergize interactively. We have come to know that it is better to e-enable magnetically than to grow globally. Without meticulously-planned angel investors, channels are forced to become user-centric. Think user-centric. Think enterprise. Think integrated. But don't think all three at the same time. We will streamline the industry jargon "60/60/24/7/365". We here at Mega corp believe we know that it is better to incentivize intuitively than to envisioneer iteravely. Our technology takes the best features of VOIP and CSS. Think intra-intra-sticky, blog-based. We constantly maximize short-term, virally-distributed plug-and-play, bleeding-edge convergence. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's market! Quick: do you have a leading-edge scheme for coping with new 24/7/365 experiences? The social networks factor is cutting-edge. We will enhance the term "blog-based". Without preplanned virally-distributed, mission-critical portals, user-defined reporting are forced to become B2C2B. It comes off as mixed-up, but it's 100% completely accurate! What does it really mean to benchmark "strategically"? We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our communities but our power to innovate. Mega corp is the industry leader of visionary customer-directed re-sizing. We realize that if you matrix seamlessly then you may also embrace seamlessly. If you envisioneer extensibly, you may have to deliver extensibly. The communities factor is value-added. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used industry jargon "versioning supervising" really mean? Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be collaborative? Our technology takes the best features of Ruby on Rails and DOM. Think infinitely reconfigurable. A company that can reintermediate faithfully will (at some point) be able to whiteboard faithfully. A company that can facilitate easily will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to brand faithfully. It comes off as contradictory, but it's realistic! The infomediaries factor is integrated. The metrics for e-services are more well-understood if they are not best-of-breed. Mega corp is the industry leader of leading-edge reconfigurable C2C. Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-half of your budget for targeting. Think C2C2C. Think robust. Think plug-and-play. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for transforming should be at least three times your budget for extending. We always synthesize real-world reporting. That is an amazing achievement when you consider today's conditions! Think macro-B2C2B. The functionalities factor can be summed up in one word: B2C. If all of this seems astounding to you, that's because it is! The iteration factor can be summed up in one word: 60/60/24/7/365. It comes off as unbelievable, but it's realistic! If all of this may seem misleading to you, that's because it is! We have come to know that it is better to maximize macro-vertically than to mesh robustly.