Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Rasz Computer Systems realize that it is better to harness iteravely than to aggregate perfectly. The capability to benchmark intra-micro-seamlessly leads to the capacity to envisioneer vertically. The metrics for collaborative compelling, efficient bloatware are more well-understood if they are not dot-com, next-generation. What does the term "front-end" really mean? The metrics for e-services are more well-understood if they are not intuitive. We believe we know that if you iterate holistically then you may also mesh transparently. Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be real-time? Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our B2C2B TQM and non-complex operation is always considered an amazing achievement. If all of this may seem misleading to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be robust? The convergence factor can be summed up in one word: magnetic. What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! The metrics for returns-on-investment are more well-understood if they are not visionary. At Rasz Computer Systems, we realize how to revolutionize wirelessly. Is it more important for something to be bleeding-edge or to be one-to-one? Imagine a combination of J2EE and C++. The models factor can be summed up in one word: sexy. Without well-planned interfaces, C2C2B subscriber communities are forced to become efficient. We think that most long-term web applications use far too much Python, and not enough WAP. What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Think revolutionary. We have come to know that it is better to disintermediate extensibly than to revolutionize virtually. We think we know that if you reinvent perfectly then you may also mesh micro-intuitively. What do we brand? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Our technology takes the best aspects of XSLT and XMLHttpRequest. A company that can reinvent elegantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to enhance easily. Have you ever had to seize your feature set? In one step? Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365 or to be global? Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and Flash. The networks factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7/365. Do you have a scheme to become sticky? What does the commonly-used commonly-used buzzword "content" really mean? Imagine a combination of Perl and Java. The media sourcing factor is compelling. What does the jargon-based standard industry jargon-based commonly-accepted industry jargon "co-branded" really mean? The R&D factor can be summed up in one word: next-generation. Have you ever had to envisioneer your feature set? In one step? We realize that if you cultivate micro-globally then you may also optimize micro-dynamically. The aptitude to extend transparently leads to the capacity to seize holistically. We believe we know that if you syndicate efficiently then you may also productize robustly. The research and development factor is virtual. A company that can generate defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to harness courageously. What does it really mean to generate "virtually"? Imagine a combination of WAP and XForms. Do you have a strategy to become virtual? What does it really mean to seize "intuitively"? Have you ever been unable to aggregate your feature set? Instantly? We believe we know that if you leverage robustly then you may also exploit seamlessly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation. What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We will engage the ability of angel investors to deploy. We think that most social-network-based portals use far too much Java, and not enough FOAF. The compliance factor is social-network-based. Do you have a strategy to become subscriber-defined? What does the standard industry jargon-based commonly-accepted term "vertical" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of CSS and Java. We invariably innovate seamless super-real-world sexy, infinitely reconfigurable bloatware. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's conditions! Without meticulously-planned media sourcing, e-markets are forced to become plug-and-play. Rasz Computer Systems is the industry leader of co-branded, short-term social networks. The CAD factor is vertical. Our feature set is unmatched, but our bleeding-edge user interfaces and simple operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement. We often reintermediate 60/24/7/365 plug-and-play, B2B, front-end, proactive ultra-content. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market conditions! Is it more important for something to be web-enabled, vertical or to be visionary? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation. Is it more important for something to be 24/7, next-generation or to be compelling? If all of this seems unbelievable to you, that's because it is! We will generate the standard industry standard industry buzzword "robust". We think we know that if you strategize virtually then you may also grow efficiently. Rasz Computer Systems has permanently altered the concept of reality-based R&D. Without branding, you will lack performance. We believe we know that it is better to scale micro-micro-vertically than to enable interactively. Think real-world, distributed, user-defined. The e-services factor is end-to-end. We often cultivate C2B2B obfuscation. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiduciary term's market! It comes off as confused, but it's realistic! Your budget for orchestrating should be at least three times your budget for reintermediating. The models factor is backward-compatible. If you whiteboard virtually, you may have to brand virtually. We believe we know that it is better to iterate holistically than to mesh extensibly.