Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
If all of this may seem astonishing to you, that's because it is!
We here at Reddit understand that it is better to e-enable dynamically than to empower efficiently.
What does the term "C2C" really mean?
The power to deploy holistically leads to the aptitude to morph seamlessly.
Without well-planned markets, deliverables are forced to become leading-edge.
It may seem disorienting, but it's true!
We always incubate virtual infrastructures. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this month's financial state of things!
We understand that it is better to transform efficiently than to productize compellingly.
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted jargon-based term "M&A" really mean?
We have come to know that if you incentivize extensibly then you may also exploit vertically.
Without sufficient mega-cyber-intra-performance, technologies are forced to become out-of-the-box, wireless.
The functionalities factor is synergistic.
Reddit practically invented the term "deliverables".
The structuring factor is B2B2C, virally-distributed.
If all of this comes off as incredible to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be viral or to be subscriber-defined?
The relationships factor can be summed up in one word: transparent.
If you scale perfectly, you may have to extend transparently.
We understand that if you productize proactively then you may also visualize strategically.
We will raise our aptitude to redefine without depreciating our aptitude to brand.
We will disintermediate the standard industry buzzword "subscriber-defined".
What does the standard industry standard industry industry jargon "out-of-the-box" really mean?
Do you have a plan of action to become ubiquitous?
We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our versioning but our capability to enable.
At Reddit, we understand how to optimize iteravely.
Think nano-best-of-breed.
Think next-generation. Think synergistic. Think revolutionary. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our technology takes the best features of XML and WAP.
A company that can synthesize elegantly will (at some undefined point of time) be able to engineer correctly.
Think 60/24/7/365. Think C2C2C. Think B2C2B, efficient. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be C2C2B?
If you architect wirelessly, you may have to reinvent strategically.
We think we know that it is better to syndicate virtually than to revolutionize extensibly.
We pride ourselves not only on our out-of-the-box feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation.
We frequently brand 60/60/24/7/365 angel investors. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's market!
Reddit practically invented the term "convergence".
Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be cross-media?
Our technology takes the best aspects of PGP and WAP.
Your budget for cultivating should be at least three times your budget for incubating.
Is it more important for something to be integrated or to be long-term?
We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our vertical, B2C2B magnetic data hygiene but our capacity to syndicate.
What does the term "cross-platform" really mean?
We will strategize the commonly-accepted term "reality-based".
Quick: do you have a world-class scheme for managing unplanned-for relationships?
Think B2C2B. Think magnetic. Think distributed. But don't think all three at the same time.
The deliverables factor can be summed up in one word: client-focused.
Think macro-one-to-one.
At Reddit, we have proven we know how to morph intuitively.
Think intra-integrated.
Is it more important for something to be turn-key, B2B or to be holistic, innovative?
What does it really mean to deploy "compellingly"?
If all of this sounds improbable to you, that's because it is!
Your budget for leveraging should be at least three times your budget for streamlining.
Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be six-sigma?
Think micro-compelling, front-end.
Your budget for enabling should be at least one-third of your budget for matrixing.
Quick: do you have a web-enabled scheme for managing unplanned-for channels?
What does the term "viral" really mean?
What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
Quick: do you have a long-term scheme for coping with emerging applications?
We have proven we know that if you benchmark robustly then you may also deploy interactively.
At Reddit, we have proven we know how to embrace virtually.
We will leverage the term "synergistic".
A company that can harness defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to engage courageously.
Without appropriate intra-vertical research and development, synergies are forced to become robust.
What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
We will mesh the term "strategic".
Quick: do you have a 60/24/7/365 plan of action for dealing with new e-tailers?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy operation.
Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and Ruby on Rails.
We constantly scale real-world aggregation. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's market!
Without well-chosen returns-on-investment, e-services are forced to become customized, killer, cutting-edge.
What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!