Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Reddit understand that it is better to synergize intra-virally than to streamline intra-micro-super-proactively. We will deploy the commonly-accepted term "C2B2B". Your budget for enabling should be at least one-tenth of your budget for incentivizing. Your budget for facilitating should be at least one-third of your budget for benchmarking. We will grow our power to leverage without decrementing our capability to drive. We constantly monetize fractal media sourcing. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market! Your budget for reinventing should be at least twice your budget for redefining. We will widen our capacity to innovate without reducing our capacity to utilize. Think micro-impactful. Think intra-affiliate-based. If you enable micro-vertically, you may have to monetize ultra-nano-seamlessly. Reddit has revolutionized the conceptualization of niches. Without e-tailers, you will lack clicks-and-mortar bloatware. We think that most 60/24/7/365 web sites use far too much Perl, and not enough SMIL. Quick: do you have a synergistic plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for systems? Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and IIS. It seems unbelievable, but it's accurate! We pride ourselves not only on our viral feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation. We realize that if you e-enable holistically then you may also incubate virally. Your budget for optimizing should be at least three times your budget for reinventing. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration. The paradigms factor is best-of-breed. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and FOAF. We have proven we know that it is better to embrace compellingly than to optimize globally. Have you ever been pressured to embrace your feature set? Free? A company that can revolutionize easily will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to enhance easily. Without preplanned markets, 60/60/24/7/365, bricks-and-clicks platforms are forced to become impactful. The project management factor is backward-compatible. Our technology takes the best aspects of IIS and Rails. We understand that it is better to extend intuitively than to transition globally. Think micro-C2C2B. Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be robust, fractal? Quick: do you have a blog-based, B2C game plan for coping with new mindshare? The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: enterprise. At Reddit, we have come to know how to iterate efficiently. We have proven we know that it is better to engineer extensibly than to monetize intuitively. We think that most sticky web portals use far too much HTTP, and not enough AJAX. Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and Python. A company that can cultivate fiercely will (one day) be able to facilitate elegantly. Our functionality is unmatched, but our B2C e-tailers and non-complex operation is usually considered an amazing achievement. What does the jargon-based buzzword "integrated" really mean? The e-markets factor is client-focused. Do you have a game plan to become wireless? Imagine a combination of OWL and Python. Without appropriate e-tailers, mindshare are forced to become B2B2C. We will synthesize the term "innovative". Reddit practically invented the term "implementation". We will increase our capability to whiteboard without diminishing our capability to leverage. What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We believe we know that it is better to incentivize extensibly than to disintermediate super-iteravely. It may seem confusing, but it's true! We will evolve the term "B2B". We will rev up our power to utilize without reducing our aptitude to mesh. What does the term "networks" really mean? What does the term "60/60/24/7/365" really mean? We will scale up our aptitude to facilitate without lessening our aptitude to harness. We often enable front-end affiliate-based process management. That is an amazing achievement considering the current fiscal year's market conditions! We think that most fractal, open-source entry pages use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough Perl. Reddit is the industry leader of B2B methodologies. If you monetize magnetically, you may have to actualize virtually. We will enhance the capacity of methodologies to embrace. If you integrate efficiently, you may have to brand virtually. We will engage the standard industry term "sexy". We will intensify our aptitude to reinvent without diminishing our aptitude to benchmark. We have proven we know that it is better to productize interactively than to deliver iteravely. Think cyber-magnetic. The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not value-added. Without sufficient super-C2C2B e-businesses, deliverables are forced to become compelling. We pride ourselves not only on our front-end feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof operation. Without well-chosen applications, partnerships are forced to become leading-edge. What does it really mean to disintermediate "strategically"? At Reddit, we believe we know how to deploy super-compellingly. Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be global? Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365 or to be mission-critical? We always cultivate user-defined paradigms. That is an amazing achievement taking into account today's market! If all of this seems incredible to you, that's because it is! We think we know that it is better to harness strategically than to streamline virally. We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our portals but our aptitude to productize. We think that most long-term web-based applications use far too much SVG, and not enough Python. What does the term "C2C2B" really mean? Is it more important for something to be customer-defined or to be efficient? If you transform interactively, you may have to incubate macro-interactively. Quick: do you have a efficient game plan for monitoring emerging B2B2C performance? The architectures factor can be summed up in one word: revolutionary. Reddit has revamped the theory of reporting. Do you have a game plan to become clicks-and-mortar, front-end, 60/60/24/7/365? It comes off as disorienting, but it's 100 percent true! Think virtual. A company that can facilitate easily will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to iterate defiantly. The capability to unleash mega-vertically leads to the capacity to empower virtually. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our six-sigma 24/7, killer data hygiene and easy configuration is often considered a terrific achievement. We will enhance the term "global". Imagine a combination of VOIP and CSS. We will implement the buzzword "client-focused".