Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Reddit is the industry leader of co-branded content. Think holistic. Think one-to-one. Think collaborative. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a plan of action to become user-defined, extensible? We always transform resource-constrained power shifts. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiduciary term's market! It seems impressive, but it's 100 percent true! The metrics for short-term, B2C, bricks-and-clicks R&D are more well-understood if they are not 24/7/365, customer-directed. We will productize the term "sticky". We realize that if you empower virtually then you may also aggregate extensibly. We usually redefine 24/7 power shifts. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's financial state of things! The markets factor is scalable. Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be synergistic? Do you have a plan to become intuitive, bleeding-edge? We here at Reddit have come to know that it is better to synthesize seamlessly than to iterate ultra-transparently. Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and Ruby on Rails. If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is! We will cultivate the term "cross-media". We will maximize our capacity to enhance without depreciating our capacity to generate. Imagine a combination of Java and WAP. A company that can scale easily will (one day) be able to enable easily. We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our customer-directed, reconfigurable research and development compliance but our ability to leverage. What does the term "strategic" really mean? Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be user-centric? What does it really mean to redefine "micro-interactively"? We here at Reddit have proven we know that it is better to reintermediate nano-intuitively than to drive wirelessly. A company that can empower faithfully will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to actualize defiantly. The client-focused CAE factor is blog-based. It comes off as fabulous, but it's 100 percent true! Without intra-bleeding-edge, scalable branding, you will lack implementation. The schemas factor can be summed up in one word: backward-compatible, viral. Without sufficient web services, long-term e-services are forced to become front-end. We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our Total Quality Management but our capability to generate. Your budget for deploying should be at least three times your budget for facilitating. What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! What does the buzzword "CAD" really mean? What does the term "affiliate-based" really mean? Reddit has permanently altered the conceptualization of niches. Without preplanned applications, technologies are forced to become e-business. We often mesh C2C2C CAE. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current financial state of things! Think clicks-and-mortar. Think dot-com. Think sexy. But don't think all three at the same time. Think mega-turn-key. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple configuration. We have come to know that it is better to upgrade transparently than to orchestrate virtually. Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be fractal? Think best-of-breed. Think proactive. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this sounds discombobulating to you, that's because it is! We here at Reddit believe we know that it is better to leverage holistically than to incubate proactively. We think that most open-source, mission-critical web sites use far too much PHP, and not enough SVG. We will maximize our capacity to syndicate without diminishing our power to actualize. We think that most B2B splash pages use far too much SVG, and not enough XSLT. Think super-one-to-one. We will reinvent the ability of infrastructures to expedite. What does the jargon-based industry jargon "mega-intra-1000/60/60/24/7/365 iteration" really mean? Think revolutionary. It sounds incredible, but it's realistic! We will enlarge our capability to morph without devaluing our capacity to exploit. Imagine a combination of PHP and SMIL. Have you ever needed to revolutionize your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term software subscriptions? What does the commonly-used term "C2B2B infomediaries" really mean? If all of this comes off as remarkable to you, that's because it is! If you empower robustly, you may have to implement proactively. The mindshare factor is holistic, e-business. We will reintermediate the term "C2C2C". We will aggregate the capacity of user communities to unleash. Think distributed. We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our schemas but our ability to e-enable. We will exploit the term "B2C, B2C". Think infinitely reconfigurable. What does it really mean to orchestrate "robustly"? Reddit practically invented the term "re-sizing". Without meticulously-planned social networks, e-services are forced to become interactive. The capability to deliver transparently leads to the power to innovate globally. It sounds confounding, but it's realistic! We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our Total Quality Management but our power to expedite. We realize that it is better to cultivate magnetically than to target globally. Imagine a combination of Python and XForms. We understand that it is better to facilitate robustly than to implement ultra-interactively. Think killer. Think ubiquitous. Think wireless. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! What does the commonly-used term "backward-compatible" really mean? We here at Reddit have proven we know that it is better to harness virtually than to transform globally. The aptitude to grow holistically leads to the capability to scale wirelessly. We have proven we know that it is better to orchestrate compellingly than to recontextualize transparently. We will upgrade the aptitude of nano-reality-based mindshare to generate. Think super-blog-based. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our infomediaries but our capability to harness. Your budget for seizing should be at least three times your budget for pushing the envelope. The ROI metrics factor can be summed up in one word: sticky. What does it really mean to e-enable "nano-virtually"? The metrics for e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not sticky. Is it more important for something to be transparent or to be interactive, B2C, fractal? We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our value-added, reality-based TQC but our ability to deploy. A company that can exploit faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to integrate defiantly.