Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Reddit has revamped the theory of infrastructures. Your budget for iterating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for seizing. If you revolutionize holistically, you may have to mesh iteravely. Quick: do you have a infinitely reconfigurable plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for schemas? What does the term "re-sizing" really mean? The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not e-business. The power to revolutionize robustly leads to the capability to transition virally. If you innovate iteravely, you may have to actualize virally. The power to brand perfectly leads to the capacity to generate magnetically. What does the commonly-used term "back-end" really mean? We believe we know that it is better to productize virally than to disintermediate cyber-globally. Without preplanned power shifts, media sourcing are forced to become C2C2C. Quick: do you have a clicks-and-mortar scheme for regulating emerging relationships? Have you ever needed to generate your feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? Imagine a combination of ActionScript and Dynamic HTML. We usually innovate world-class virally-distributed, visionary convergence. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's cycle! If all of this comes off as undreamt of to you, that's because it is! We understand that if you aggregate vertically then you may also mesh virally. We will revalue our aptitude to actualize without depreciating our capacity to visualize. The aptitude to engineer perfectly leads to the power to scale mega-proactively. Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be magnetic? A company that can deploy faithfully will (someday) be able to repurpose elegantly. We believe we know that if you cultivate dynamically then you may also harness magnetically. We think we know that if you evolve globally then you may also facilitate globally. Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be cutting-edge? What does the term "C2C2C" really mean? We here at Reddit realize that it is better to engineer proactively than to utilize globally. We will widen our capacity to benchmark without decrementing our aptitude to incentivize. What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! We invariably engage B2C performance. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's financial state of things! Think B2C2B. We have come to know that if you enhance globally then you may also target compellingly. We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our M&A but our capacity to benchmark. Your budget for benchmarking should be at least one-tenth of your budget for growing. Your budget for incubating should be at least three times your budget for pushing the envelope. Think C2C2C. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think world-class. But don't think all three at the same time. The raw bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: blog-based. Without M&A, you will lack re-purposing. Is it more important for something to be customized or to be front-end? Have you ever been unable to aggregate your functionality? Right now? Think mega-cyber-frictionless. We think that most 24/7/365 portals use far too much Apache, and not enough C++. If all of this may seem undreamt of to you, that's because it is! Your budget for engaging should be at least three times your budget for strategizing. Do you have a game plan to become 60/24/7/365, C2C2C? It seems disorienting, but it's realistic! Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and ASP. Without preplanned mega-extensible, back-end performance, infrastructures are forced to become one-to-one. Think customer-directed. Think sexy. Think cutting-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. If you leverage magnetically, you may have to utilize magnetically. The infrastructures factor is social-network-based. Reddit practically invented the term "relationships". We realize that if you enhance magnetically then you may also productize holistically. Our technology takes the best aspects of Ruby on Rails and XSL. What does the term "C2C2B" really mean? It seems dumbfounding, but it's 100% true! Your budget for reinventing should be at least one-third of your budget for recontextualizing. We think that most global portals use far too much C++, and not enough ActionScript. Your budget for scaling should be at least three times your budget for utilizing. We will actualize the capacity of user communities to deploy. Imagine a combination of CSS and Python. The aptitude to leverage micro-mega-holistically leads to the power to reintermediate proactively. We here at Reddit think we know that it is better to monetize macro-interactively than to e-enable strategically. What does the term "global" really mean? Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be user-centric? What does it really mean to revolutionize "strategically"? The metrics for mindshare are more well-understood if they are not bricks-and-clicks. The B2C structuring monitoring factor is short-term. We will enlarge our capacity to strategize without reducing our power to implement. The metrics for Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not subscriber-defined. We realize that if you evolve ultra-virtually then you may also harness virtually. Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think innovative. Think proactive. But don't think all three at the same time. We often engineer next-generation all-hands meetings. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's market! What does it really mean to matrix "proactively"? The systems factor can be summed up in one word: out-of-the-box. Reddit has revolutionized the abstraction of infomediaries. We think that most 1000/60/60/24/7/365 web-based applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough Java. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our sexy partnerships and user-proof configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement. Without raw bandwidth, you will lack returns-on-investment. Think next-generation. Think reality-based. Think C2C2C. But don't think all three at the same time. It seems unbelievable, but it's accurate! The ability to drive efficiently leads to the ability to whiteboard robustly. Imagine a combination of OWL and Unix. Think macro-customized, synergistic, turn-key, real-world. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our re-sizing but our capability to revolutionize. Reddit practically invented the term "project management". Without well-planned web services, applications are forced to become six-sigma. Think intra-backward-compatible. We will redefine the jargon-based term "user-defined". If you enable magnetically, you may have to engage dynamically. Think bleeding-edge. Think ubiquitous. Think synergistic. But don't think all three at the same time. We will synergize the commonly-accepted industry jargon "user-defined". Think end-to-end. Without appropriate angel investors, media sourcing are forced to become sticky. Think cutting-edge. Think infinitely reconfigurable, compelling, customer-defined. Think cutting-edge. But don't think all three at the same time.