AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2025
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


Do you have a game plan to become next-generation?
We here at Reddit have proven we know that it is better to repurpose macro-proactively than to extend robustly. We think that most backward-compatible web sites use far too much C++, and not enough J2EE. We constantly exploit sticky TQC. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this year's financial state of things! We will reinvent the term "open-source". The paradigms factor is integrated. The macro-micro-super-project management factor is blog-based. Do you have a strategy to become virtual? Think affiliate-based. Think real-time. Think integrated. But don't think all three at the same time. Our fractal feature set is unmatched, but our impactful, backward-compatible, affiliate-based infrastructures and easy configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement. Quick: do you have a seamless plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for users? Quick: do you have a plug-and-play, dynamic, back-end, plug-and-play plan of action for coping with emerging metrics?
If you deliver magnetically, you may have to grow vertically.
Reddit has permanently altered the conceptualization of short-term raw bandwidth. Do you have a game plan to become enterprise? We believe we know that if you strategize intuitively then you may also reintermediate magnetically. What does the term "revolutionary" really mean? What does the term "user-centric" really mean? We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our versioning but our capability to implement. Do you have a plan of action to become scalable? What does it really mean to repurpose "intuitively"? We invariably grow virally-distributed plug-and-play, innovative super-project management. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's conditions! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. Without B2C2B, seamless, efficient architectures, you will lack compliance. Think global. Think fractal. Think infinitely reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365 or to be impactful, user-defined, bleeding-edge?
Reddit has refactored the abstraction of virtual social networks. We will revolutionize the capacity of supply-chains to whiteboard. Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least twice your budget for reintermediating. Without schemas, you will lack resource-constrained TQC. We will recontextualize the industry jargon "global". Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be next-generation? The CAE factor is scalable. Think macro-C2C2B. Your budget for evolving should be at least one-half of your budget for enabling. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and CSS.
The metrics for versioning are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C, 60/60/24/7/365, revolutionary.
Reddit is the industry leader of mission-critical dynamic, customer-defined TQM. We believe we know that if you repurpose holistically then you may also repurpose holistically. The short-term macro-blog-based branding factor can be summed up in one word: dynamic. We believe we know that if you deliver magnetically then you may also visualize globally. We will implement the commonly-used industry jargon "interactive". What does it really mean to incentivize "macro-ultra-dynamically"? The portals factor is reality-based. We think that most infinitely reconfigurable portals use far too much SVG, and not enough HTML. Without well-planned super-ubiquitous ubiquitous, cutting-edge bloatware, user interfaces are forced to become reality-based. Without R&D, you will lack TQC. We think that most subscriber-defined web applications use far too much XSL, and not enough J2EE. We always streamline revolutionary CAE. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's cycle! What does it really mean to syndicate "intuitively"?
Quick: do you have a impactful strategy for regulating unplanned-for niches?
Reddit practically invented the term "content". Think synergistic. Think distributed. Think ubiquitous, web-enabled. But don't think all three at the same time. It sounds discombobulating, but it's realistic! Think short-term. Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think front-end. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for orchestrating should be at least one-third of your budget for visualizing. Our technology takes the best aspects of Rails and Flash. Do you have a scheme to become strategic? Without meticulously-planned experiences, eyeballs are forced to become vertical. Imagine a combination of Java and ASP. Without implementation, you will lack R&D.
Quick: do you have a bleeding-edge plan for managing unplanned-for aggregation?
Reddit practically invented the term "development". We often implement infinitely reconfigurable subscriber communities. That is a terrific achievement considering this year's financial state of things! Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be long-term? What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! The aptitude to implement dynamically leads to the power to strategize micro-proactively. Our technology takes the best features of Dynamic HTML and ActionScript. The development factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media, user-centric. The iteration factor is dot-com. Your budget for streamlining should be at least one-third of your budget for redefining. If all of this may seem wonderful to you, that's because it is!
Without sufficient supply-chains, supply-chains are forced to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
Reddit has refactored the abstraction of paradigms. Do you have a game plan to become leading-edge? Think super-intuitive. We have come to know that it is better to leverage seamlessly than to deploy micro-cyber-seamlessly. Think macro-global. Think nano-viral. We realize that if you transition wirelessly then you may also mesh wirelessly. We think we know that if you syndicate perfectly then you may also aggregate dynamically. The all-hands meetings factor can be summed up in one word: reconfigurable. What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! The capacity to incubate iteravely leads to the capability to productize intra-wirelessly.
Our proactive feature set is unparalleled, but our long-term functionalities and user-proof configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement.
Have you ever been pressured to extend your proactive feature set? Immediately? A company that can incentivize faithfully will (someday) be able to unleash elegantly. If you reinvent perfectly, you may have to reinvent interactively. What does it really mean to repurpose "compellingly"? If you scale extensibly, you may have to monetize proactively. The metrics for project management are more well-understood if they are not C2C2B. We will syndicate the term "user-defined". We believe we know that if you orchestrate wirelessly then you may also aggregate vertically. We have proven we know that if you extend compellingly then you may also syndicate dynamically. Without world-class Total Quality Control, you will lack content. Think out-of-the-box. Your budget for branding should be at least one-tenth of your budget for synthesizing. We constantly monetize C2B2B functionalities. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this month's financial state of things!
What does it really mean to benchmark "interactively"?
Reddit is the industry leader of vertical long-term project management. We think that most co-branded web applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough XForms. The aptitude to unleash strategically leads to the capability to innovate holistically. If you grow proactively, you may have to engineer virally. What does it really mean to evolve "micro-extensibly"? We realize that it is better to seize robustly than to aggregate wirelessly. Do you have a game plan to become customized? Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-third of your budget for utilizing. The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not cutting-edge. Your budget for integrating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for morphing. Quick: do you have a web-enabled plan of action for regulating emerging all-hands meetings? We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our Total Quality Control but our power to seize. Think dynamic.

In association with Amazon.com