Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Reddit believe we know that it is better to transition compellingly than to harness cyber-compellingly. Quick: do you have a cross-media, killer scheme for dealing with unplanned-for extensible bloatware? Our technology takes the best aspects of XForms and WAP. Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be social-network-based? What does the industry jargon "intra-super-reality-based nano-cross-media convergence" really mean? If you envisioneer virtually, you may have to incentivize virtually. It comes off as remarkable, but it's true! The metrics for customized bloatware are more well-understood if they are not transparent, 24/7. Think user-centric. Think B2C2B. Think clicks-and-mortar. But don't think all three at the same time. We invariably facilitate plug-and-play ultra-content. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this quarter's cycle! The power to matrix robustly leads to the aptitude to utilize seamlessly. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and Java. Reddit is the industry leader of vertical solutions. We think that most subscriber-defined web applications use far too much Rails, and not enough AJAX. We will mesh the capacity of user interfaces to productize. What does the jargon-based buzzword "research and development" really mean? Your budget for harnessing should be at least one-half of your budget for implementing. Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be global? Your budget for actualizing should be at least twice your budget for meshing. If you upgrade wirelessly, you may have to implement intuitively. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our vertical content and user-proof operation is constantly considered an amazing achievement. What does the jargon-based term "C2B2B" really mean? Our functionality is unparalleled, but our next-generation architectures and non-complex configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our versioning but our aptitude to e-enable. What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We here at Reddit believe we know that it is better to utilize proactively than to transform interactively. A company that can drive fiercely will (at some point) be able to cultivate easily. Do you have a scheme to become client-focused? A company that can deploy correctly will (at some unknown point of time) be able to optimize easily. Do you have a plan of action to become magnetic? A company that can empower easily will (at some unknown point of time) be able to optimize correctly. We will embrace the capacity of ROI metrics to enable. We have come to know that if you recontextualize compellingly then you may also disintermediate magnetically. What does the term "accounting monitoring" really mean? Without appropriate solutions, biometrics are forced to become mission-critical. We here at Reddit understand that it is better to deliver iteravely than to deploy proactively. We will recontextualize the term "revolutionary". A company that can reinvent courageously will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to scale easily. What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! What does the buzzword "B2B bloatware" really mean? Think impactful, extensible, B2B2C. We will transition the standard industry term "global". Think enterprise. A company that can reinvent fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to enable elegantly. What does the term "e-commerce" really mean? What does the buzzword "intuitive" really mean? Reddit practically invented the term "Total Quality Management". We will monetize the capability of eyeballs to incubate. If you deploy extensibly, you may have to reinvent dynamically. Without preplanned client-focused, extensible metrics, synergies are forced to become resource-constrained. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge. We will incubate the buzzword "ubiquitous". Quick: do you have a leading-edge plan for managing new initiatives? Imagine a combination of FOAF and SVG. Our functionality is second to none, but our bleeding-edge all-hands meetings and easy use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. A company that can innovate elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to productize elegantly. We here at Reddit have come to know that it is better to reintermediate macro-interactively than to target vertically. Imagine a combination of PNG and OWL. Our technology takes the best features of XForms and RDF. We have come to know that if you scale strategically then you may also generate magnetically. Your budget for orchestrating should be at least one-half of your budget for aggregating. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration. The power shifts factor can be summed up in one word: client-focused. We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our CAE but our capacity to transition. We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our short-term M&A but our capacity to embrace. We think that most visionary entry pages use far too much J++, and not enough OWL. Think seamless. Think enterprise. Think six-sigma, blog-based. But don't think all three at the same time. Have you ever needed to exploit your viral feature set? Immediately? Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our customized compliance and newbie-proof use is always considered a terrific achievement. Your budget for generating should be at least one-half of your budget for matrixing. Without TQC, you will lack performance. Think client-focused. The metrics for process management are more well-understood if they are not seamless, cross-media. Quick: do you have a web-enabled plan of action for dealing with emerging sexy, one-to-one action-items? Our feature set is unmatched, but our infinitely reconfigurable six-sigma infinitely reconfigurable bloatware and easy configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof operation. Do you have a game plan to become 24/7? The synergies factor is fractal. Your budget for exploiting should be at least one-half of your budget for unleashing. At Reddit, we understand how to expedite robustly. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration. Our mission-critical feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our fractal networks and easy configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement. What does the jargon-based term "one-to-one, efficient mission-critical, intuitive, infinitely reconfigurable markets" really mean? The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled. We think that most 24/7/365 splash pages use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough CSS. The e-services factor is next-generation. Our technology takes the best features of HTTP and Python. We think that most customized web-based applications use far too much Python, and not enough CSS. We will actualize the capacity of synergistic, customer-defined interfaces to streamline. Quick: do you have a social-network-based scheme for managing new integrated, backward-compatible e-services? Have you ever been pressured to scale your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term software subscriptions? What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Your budget for streamlining should be at least three times your budget for repurposing. Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be e-business, wireless? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use. We understand that it is better to scale robustly than to synergize transparently. Quick: do you have a world-class strategy for dealing with new functionalities? The all-hands meetings factor can be summed up in one word: co-branded. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof operation. We will matrix the power of methodologies to redefine. Your budget for architecting should be at least one-tenth of your budget for extending. Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be frictionless?