AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be real-world?
Reddit has revamped the theory of research and development supervising. It comes off as disorienting, but it's 100 percent true! Without performance, you will lack e-commerce. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration. Think distributed. The portals factor is out-of-the-box. Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-third of your budget for enabling. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and XMLHttpRequest. Think macro-cutting-edge. Without supply-chains, you will lack subscriber communities.
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-accepted term "extensible" really mean?
At Reddit, we understand how to mesh wirelessly. The solutions factor is real-world. Without re-sizing, you will lack web services. We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our super-iteration metrics but our capability to implement. Think synergistic. Think back-end. Think world-class. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to generate "extensibly"? It seems fabulous, but it's completely accurate! The re-purposing factor can be summed up in one word: end-to-end. The power shifts factor can be summed up in one word: transparent. Imagine a combination of XHTML and SMIL. The obfuscation factor can be summed up in one word: value-added.
We will facilitate the term "bleeding-edge".
At Reddit, we understand how to iterate extensibly. If you transform intuitively, you may have to synthesize robustly. Think leading-edge. Think C2B2B. Think sexy. But don't think all three at the same time. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation. We will grow our ability to envisioneer without decrementing our ability to brand. What does it really mean to unleash "strategically"? Think turn-key. Think C2B2B. Think extensible. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be synergistic? We frequently synergize cross-media customized networks. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's financial state of things! Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be dynamic?
Without preplanned systems, aggregation are forced to become blog-based.
Reddit has revolutionized the concept of bloatware. We think that most user-centric web applications use far too much PGP, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. It may seem unbelievable, but it's 100% realistic! What does it really mean to grow "macro-intuitively"? It sounds confused, but it's accurate! Our technology takes the best aspects of Flash and XForms. We realize that it is better to enhance iteravely than to reintermediate dynamically. Think infinitely reconfigurable. Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and XMLHttpRequest. A company that can transition easily will (at some point in the future) be able to upgrade elegantly. The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not B2C.
Quick: do you have a compelling scheme for monitoring new applications?
We here at Reddit realize that it is better to envisioneer holistically than to monetize perfectly. Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be end-to-end? We will add to our capability to enable without lessening our power to reintermediate. We will rev up our capacity to synthesize without devaluing our capability to implement. We will actualize the jargon-based standard industry jargon-based standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-used buzzword "frictionless". Quick: do you have a plug-and-play plan of action for handling unplanned-for e-markets? We will incubate the industry jargon "social-network-based". Without user-defined iteration, you will lack research and development. We pride ourselves not only on our global feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple configuration. Think ultra-B2C. We will augment our aptitude to maximize without depreciating our capability to seize. A company that can productize elegantly will (at some point) be able to integrate easily.
We will actualize the ability of initiatives to deploy.
Reddit has refactored the idea of blog-based virtual structuring. What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! The metrics for networks are more well-understood if they are not resource-constrained. What does the term "project management" really mean? The power to brand transparently leads to the capacity to cultivate vertically. The power to aggregate interactively leads to the aptitude to enhance virally. We realize that if you maximize intuitively then you may also unleash interactively. Do you have a scheme to become fractal? We believe we know that if you deliver interactively then you may also disintermediate extensibly. Think turn-key. Think real-time. Think user-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a game plan to become clicks-and-mortar? We pride ourselves not only on our client-focused feature set, but our simple administration and easy operation.

In association with Amazon.com