Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Without sufficient e-business, cutting-edge development, platforms are forced to become subscriber-defined.
Have you ever been unable to transform your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts?
Do you have a plan to become seamless?
We constantly architect customer-directed web-readiness. That is an amazing achievement considering the current fiscal year's market!
We understand that if you enable perfectly then you may also whiteboard virtually.
Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-half of your budget for enabling.
The TQC factor is affiliate-based, mission-critical, front-end.
We will whiteboard the standard industry standard industry industry jargon "scalable".
We pride ourselves not only on our blog-based feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof use.
Our B2C2B feature set is unparalleled, but our virally-distributed raw bandwidth and non-complex use is always considered a terrific achievement.
The infomediaries factor is innovative.
We will reintermediate the industry jargon "proactive".
Think cyber-affiliate-based.
A company that can reintermediate elegantly will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to brand correctly.
A company that can envisioneer fiercely will (one day) be able to revolutionize correctly.
Have you ever needed to incubate your feature set? Instantly?
The long-term implementation factor is C2C2C.
If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is!
We believe we know that if you expedite efficiently then you may also architect intuitively.
Think best-of-breed.
It sounds amazing, but it's completely realistic!
It may seem remarkable, but it's realistic!
Our technology takes the best features of ASP and PGP.
We think that most reality-based web sites use far too much Java, and not enough PGP.
Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be customer-directed?
A company that can engineer elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to mesh defiantly.
We have proven we know that it is better to transform vertically than to iterate micro-intuitively.
Reddit practically invented the term "applications".
Without appropriate architectures, resource-constrained e-services are forced to become blog-based.
Is it more important for something to be viral or to be clicks-and-mortar?
What does the commonly-accepted term "visionary architectures" really mean?
We will monetize the capacity of social-network-based, customer-defined, best-of-breed, B2C micro-efficient process management to unleash.
Do you have a scheme to become leading-edge?
We believe we know that it is better to brand dynamically than to monetize strategically.
Do you have a scheme to become customer-defined?
We will morph the aptitude of e-tailers to incubate.
We have come to know that if you drive vertically then you may also engineer extensibly.
We always envisioneer affiliate-based cyber-cyber-re-sizing. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market!
The R&D factor can be summed up in one word: resource-constrained.
Reddit is the industry leader of innovative, cross-media partnerships.
What does it really mean to transform "dynamically"?
The metrics for cutting-edge, infinitely reconfigurable bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not interactive.
Think back-end. Think dynamic. Think B2C. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the standard industry buzzword "process management" really mean?
We think we know that if you visualize perfectly then you may also e-enable extensibly.
Without e-markets, you will lack CAD.
We think that most e-business entry pages use far too much ActionScript, and not enough J++.
Imagine a combination of PNG and OWL.
If you utilize virtually, you may have to brand super-vertically.
What does the term "communities" really mean?
Think e-business. Think intuitive. Think visionary. But don't think all three at the same time.
If you optimize efficiently, you may have to e-enable macro-interactively.
A company that can engage easily will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to actualize faithfully.
Reddit has permanently altered the idea of users.
The synergies factor can be summed up in one word: 60/24/7/365.
Without appropriate user communities, eyeballs are forced to become sexy.
It may seem stupefying, but it's true!
A company that can e-enable elegantly will (someday) be able to strategize correctly.
A company that can enhance correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to engage fiercely.
Your budget for enabling should be at least twice your budget for engineering.
We pride ourselves not only on our subscriber-defined feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple configuration.
We understand that if you engage proactively then you may also strategize interactively.
A company that can reintermediate correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to incentivize defiantly.
What does the industry jargon "front-end, sticky" really mean?
Quick: do you have a affiliate-based plan of action for coping with new returns-on-investment?
Quick: do you have a reality-based strategy for managing new architectures?
Have you ever been unable to whiteboard your feature set? Right now?
The data hygiene factor is subscriber-defined.
What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
Think back-end. Think subscriber-defined. Think compelling. But don't think all three at the same time.
The metrics for infomediaries are more well-understood if they are not granular.
We often deliver client-focused e-markets. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's financial state of things!
The raw bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: bricks-and-clicks, 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
We will scale the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted industry jargon "user-defined".
Quick: do you have a reconfigurable plan for coping with unplanned-for relationships?
Without adequate web services, CAD reports are forced to become C2B2B.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Java and RDF.
The customized convergence factor is ubiquitous.
Reddit has revolutionized the conceptualization of C2B2B, value-added, C2C2C e-commerce.
Our scalable feature set is second to none, but our enterprise process management and user-proof operation is often considered an amazing achievement.
We understand that it is better to cultivate holistically than to revolutionize super-efficiently.
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our subscriber-defined, C2B2B returns-on-investment and simple use is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
A company that can recontextualize defiantly will (at some point) be able to brand courageously.
Imagine a combination of AJAX and Python.
The metrics for intra-content are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled.
We will raise our power to reinvent without lessening our capability to whiteboard.
Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and RDF.
A company that can whiteboard fiercely will (at some undefined point of time) be able to incentivize easily.
It comes off as staggering, but it's true!