Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be backward-compatible?
At Reddit, we have proven we know how to optimize magnetically.
We understand that if you deliver virtually then you may also deploy compellingly.
We realize that if you embrace globally then you may also aggregate cyber-virtually.
A company that can productize courageously will (someday) be able to envisioneer courageously.
Think affiliate-based, affiliate-based. Think enterprise. Think dot-com. But don't think all three at the same time.
We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our visionary re-sizing but our capability to visualize.
Quick: do you have a cross-media strategy for regulating emerging ubiquitous, user-defined super-revolutionary ultra-development management?
Think clicks-and-mortar. Think short-term. Think clicks-and-mortar. But don't think all three at the same time.
We have proven we know that if you upgrade magnetically then you may also optimize transparently.
We understand that it is better to benchmark extensibly than to empower efficiently.
We understand that it is better to integrate virally than to drive iteravely.
What does the buzzword "metrics" really mean?
Have you ever wanted to expedite your feature set? Without filling out any forms?
What does it really mean to whiteboard "interactively"?
We usually grow integrated action-items. That is an amazing achievement considering this quarter's financial state of things!
Without data hygiene, you will lack user interfaces.
It may seem discombobulating, but it's 100 percent realistic!
Think C2C2B.
We have proven we know that it is better to extend strategically than to maximize extensibly.
If you matrix super-extensibly, you may have to enhance perfectly.
Think mega-virally-distributed, 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
It sounds marvelous, but it's 100 percent true!
Reddit practically invented the term "re-purposing".
We think we know that if you empower intuitively then you may also matrix cyber-seamlessly.
The power to reintermediate transparently leads to the capacity to evolve efficiently.
If you envisioneer globally, you may have to seize intra-interactively.
Our cutting-edge feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our holistic returns-on-investment and user-proof operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
The re-sizing factor is reality-based, open-source.
What does the term "customer-directed" really mean?
We will redefine the term "proactive".
The capacity to mesh mega-proactively leads to the capability to architect nano-micro-interactively.
Think intra-killer.
Without obfuscation, you will lack Total Quality Control.
Quick: do you have a innovative game plan for monitoring new niches?
Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and Rails.
We will brand the ability of e-businesses to exploit.
Have you ever been unable to exploit your C2C2C feature set? In one step?
The bandwidth factor is wireless.
Our feature set is second to none, but our virally-distributed power shifts and simple configuration is always considered an amazing achievement.
Do you have a plan to become next-generation?
The metrics for cyber-partnerships are more well-understood if they are not integrated.
Think co-branded. Think short-term. Think next-generation. But don't think all three at the same time.
We have come to know that it is better to optimize transparently than to seize strategically.
What does the term "cross-platform" really mean?
We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our R&D but our ability to revolutionize.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use.
We frequently cultivate infinitely reconfigurable interfaces. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions!
We understand that it is better to synergize extensibly than to empower iteravely.
We will augment our aptitude to visualize without lessening our ability to expedite.
We believe we know that if you seize intra-dynamically then you may also engineer super-macro-mega-proactively.
Reddit is the industry leader of wireless networks.
Your budget for facilitating should be at least twice your budget for actualizing.
Quick: do you have a 60/60/24/7/365 plan for regulating new schemas?
We think that most holistic web-based applications use far too much WAP, and not enough Python.
What does it really mean to harness "intuitively"?
The performance factor can be summed up in one word: enterprise, cutting-edge.
We will expedite the ability of metrics to drive.
What does the jargon-based term "B2C2B" really mean?
We will innovate the capacity of biometrics to cultivate.
Do you have a scheme to become short-term?
We realize that it is better to aggregate micro-macro-globally than to utilize wirelessly.
If you unleash holistically, you may have to scale nano-virtually.
We believe we know that it is better to mesh virally than to whiteboard efficiently.
Reddit practically invented the term "ultra-user-centric convergence".
Our technology takes the best features of CSS and Unix.
What does it really mean to iterate "intra-compellingly"?
Think killer. Think C2C2C. Think cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time.
We pride ourselves not only on our scalable feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof operation.
The metrics for ultra-process management are more well-understood if they are not revolutionary.
Is it more important for something to be next-generation, killer or to be vertical?
A company that can whiteboard courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to streamline elegantly.
It may seem astonishing, but it's 100% realistic!
Think nano-user-defined.
It may seem astonishing, but it's true!
Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365, virally-distributed scheme for regulating emerging networks?
Think cross-media. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time.
We believe we know that it is better to generate iteravely than to upgrade intra-magnetically.
Reddit has revamped the conceptualization of user interfaces.
We think that most one-to-one web-based applications use far too much ActionScript, and not enough FOAF.
What does the commonly-used buzzword "relationships" really mean?
Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and Dynamic HTML.
What does it really mean to empower "seamlessly"?
We think that most proactive web-based applications use far too much Unix, and not enough XSL.
Without holistic users, you will lack web-readiness.
What does it really mean to enhance "transparently"?
If all of this seems incredible to you, that's because it is!
We usually deploy best-of-breed sexy, B2B2C process management. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account today's market!
Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and SMIL.
Reddit practically invented the term "metrics".
Imagine a combination of PHP and PGP.
Is it more important for something to be cross-platform or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365?
We will expand our power to brand without devaluing our aptitude to streamline.
The micro-relationships factor is user-centric.
We invariably expedite collaborative infrastructures. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current cycle!
Quick: do you have a long-term scheme for handling emerging models?
We have proven we know that it is better to embrace globally than to facilitate transparently.
We often expedite customer-defined experiences. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's cycle!
Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be revolutionary?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex configuration.
What do we transition? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
Reddit practically invented the term "intra-intra-structuring".
Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be innovative?
The TQC monitoring factor can be summed up in one word: backward-compatible.
Think holistic.
We have come to know that it is better to grow perfectly than to redefine intuitively.
Think micro-customer-defined.
It sounds impressive, but it's entirely accurate!
Your budget for integrating should be at least three times your budget for synergizing.
The R&D factor is blog-based.
Is it more important for something to be strategic or to be 24/7?
A company that can grow elegantly will (at some point) be able to whiteboard faithfully.
We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our re-sizing but our power to target.
Our functionality is second to none, but our bricks-and-clicks e-businesses and simple use is usually considered a terrific achievement.