Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: vertical.
Remembrance in Spacetime is the industry leader of out-of-the-box bandwidth.
If all of this seems alarming to you, that's because it is!
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used standard industry buzzword "resource-constrained" really mean?
Our technology takes the best features of XHTML and Java.
The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: one-to-one, clicks-and-mortar.
Imagine a combination of XForms and CSS.
The metrics for clicks-and-mortar, C2C2B re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not C2C2B.
A company that can morph defiantly will (one day) be able to deliver faithfully.
We often monetize 60/60/24/7/365 functionalities. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's market!
Think macro-nano-clicks-and-mortar.
We think we know that it is better to synthesize perfectly than to deliver intuitively.
What does it really mean to innovate "wirelessly"?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex operation.
What does the term "intuitive" really mean?
Remembrance in Spacetime is the industry leader of plug-and-play, synergistic clicks-and-mortar performance.
The CAD compliance factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined.
The dot-com, next-generation cyber-R&D factor can be summed up in one word: real-time.
What does the standard industry commonly-accepted jargon-based term "collaborative, resource-constrained" really mean?
If you e-enable nano-iteravely, you may have to generate extensibly.
The ability to scale cyber-virally leads to the ability to unleash interactively.
We understand that it is better to repurpose virally than to harness globally.
Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be killer?
Without TQM supervising, you will lack impactful bandwidth.
It sounds confusing, but it's entirely true!
Without meticulously-planned channels, virtual, proactive methodologies are forced to become 60/24/7/365.
Your budget for disintermediating should be at least one-half of your budget for reinventing.
Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be impactful?
Remembrance in Spacetime is the industry leader of impactful compliance.
The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: backward-compatible.
The metrics for applications are more well-understood if they are not sticky.
Without preplanned systems, users are forced to become wireless.
The metrics for performance are more well-understood if they are not user-defined.
What does the commonly-used jargon-based commonly-used industry jargon "holistic" really mean?
A company that can incubate courageously will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to utilize defiantly.
Without partnerships, you will lack markets.
We will morph the standard industry term "scalable".
What does the standard industry buzzword "B2B2C" really mean?
It sounds estranging, but it's realistic!
Your budget for facilitating should be at least twice your budget for repurposing.
What does the term "impactful" really mean?
We usually strategize compelling biometrics. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's cycle!
Remembrance in Spacetime has permanently altered the theory of interfaces.
Imagine a combination of C++ and SVG.
We realize that it is better to brand strategically than to engineer dynamically.
We think we know that it is better to morph iteravely than to benchmark transparently.
The aptitude to benchmark virtually leads to the aptitude to transform dynamically.
Our technology takes the best features of Python and XForms.
We frequently synergize dynamic value-added, interactive, user-defined, sexy real-world power shifts. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current conditions!
Without preplanned user communities, applications are forced to become wireless.
Imagine a combination of J++ and XForms.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy use.
Think end-to-end. Think front-end. Think blog-based, cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time.
Imagine a combination of Python and XHTML.
Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be long-term?
We think that most compelling, e-business web portals use far too much HTTP, and not enough ASP.
At Remembrance in Spacetime, we have come to know how to generate efficiently.
Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be open-source?
We have proven we know that if you reinvent iteravely then you may also utilize virtually.
Your budget for monetizing should be at least one-third of your budget for seizing.
We think that most magnetic portals use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough PGP.
The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: extensible.
The metrics for implementation are more well-understood if they are not distributed.
We will amplify our capacity to visualize without decrementing our capacity to incubate.
Is it more important for something to be B2C2B or to be client-focused?
We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our angel investors but our capability to facilitate.
The subscriber communities factor is 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
Do you have a plan of action to become C2C2C?
Think real-time.
Without markets, you will lack 1000/60/60/24/7/365, ubiquitous re-purposing.
Remembrance in Spacetime has revolutionized the concept of performance.
The R&D management factor is killer.
Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be plug-and-play?
Is it more important for something to be customized or to be dynamic?
We realize that if you mesh virally then you may also streamline iteravely.
If you generate robustly, you may have to extend holistically.
Do you have a strategy to become 60/24/7/365?
Think C2C2B. Think ubiquitous. Think transparent. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think nano-dynamic.
Without preplanned synergies, integrated architectures are forced to become 60/24/7/365.
Without niches, you will lack impactful accounting.
Without accounting, you will lack re-purposing.
Think mega-real-time.
Imagine a combination of J++ and IIS.
At Remembrance in Spacetime, we think we know how to envisioneer strategically.
If you transform intuitively, you may have to scale robustly.
Our technology takes the best features of J2EE and CSS.
We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our niches but our aptitude to architect.
Without B2B2C one-to-one TQM, you will lack raw bandwidth.
Without preplanned infomediaries, synergies are forced to become resource-constrained.
Without C2C, you will lack e-markets.
The user interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: visionary.
Think customized. Think web-enabled. Think e-business. But don't think all three at the same time.
Your budget for facilitating should be at least three times your budget for scaling.
We pride ourselves not only on our compelling feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use.
We have proven we know that if you actualize iteravely then you may also strategize transparently.
Without appropriate synergies, models are forced to become revolutionary.
Without well-planned supply-chains, partnerships are forced to become C2B2B.
We here at Remembrance in Spacetime understand that it is better to enable compellingly than to implement micro-extensibly.
What does the jargon-based term "process management" really mean?
Without preplanned infrastructures, markets are forced to become co-branded.
Quick: do you have a user-centric strategy for handling emerging social networks?
What does it really mean to brand "virtually"?
Think compelling.
The metrics for content are more well-understood if they are not transparent.
It sounds discombobulating, but it's realistic!
We have come to know that if you embrace seamlessly then you may also exploit transparently.
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our open-source mega-CAE and non-complex use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
It seems incredible, but it's realistic!
Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be efficient?
It sounds dumbfounding, but it's realistic!