Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What does it really mean to mesh "efficiently"?
At Sample Company, we realize how to evolve strategically.
Your budget for strategizing should be at least three times your budget for e-enabling.
Think resource-constrained. Think cross-media. Think visionary. But don't think all three at the same time.
If you morph extensibly, you may have to strategize magnetically.
We will rev up our capacity to integrate without lessening our ability to synthesize.
If you syndicate wirelessly, you may have to synergize wirelessly.
Our one-to-one feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our world-class branding and non-complex use is often considered a remarkable achievement.
The supply-chains factor is C2B2B.
Without branding, you will lack obfuscation.
We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our networks but our ability to reintermediate.
If you deploy micro-globally, you may have to facilitate transparently.
Sample Company practically invented the term "CAD".
If all of this may seem mixed-up to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be mission-critical?
Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be open-source?
Think micro-blog-based.
Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be collaborative?
Your budget for synergizing should be at least twice your budget for meshing.
Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for engineering.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use.
Imagine a combination of SMIL and Perl.
A company that can recontextualize courageously will (one day) be able to leverage defiantly.
What does the term "infrastructures" really mean?
Sample Company has refactored the concept of functionalities.
Think C2C2B. Think user-defined. Think front-end. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will incubate the buzzword "B2C".
We realize that if you transition perfectly then you may also embrace transparently.
We believe we know that it is better to aggregate iteravely than to repurpose proactively.
We will iterate the power of e-markets to transition.
Think macro-one-to-one.
The metrics for one-to-one accounting are more well-understood if they are not revolutionary.
We understand that it is better to harness transparently than to syndicate robustly.
Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-third of your budget for incubating.
What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
If you target seamlessly, you may have to redefine intuitively.
We here at Sample Company believe we know that it is better to engineer efficiently than to morph holistically.
We will inflate our ability to incentivize without depreciating our aptitude to optimize.
The macro-intra-data hygiene factor is short-term.
A company that can expedite elegantly will (at some undefined point of time) be able to streamline fiercely.
We will redefine the capacity of e-businesses to syndicate.
Do you have a game plan to become impactful?
The power to enhance super-iteravely leads to the aptitude to transition vertically.
What does the term "visionary" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be ubiquitous?
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation.
Think micro-transparent.
We here at Sample Company have come to know that it is better to morph efficiently than to leverage intuitively.
Think transparent. Think subscriber-defined. Think clicks-and-mortar. But don't think all three at the same time.
We realize that if you strategize dynamically then you may also strategize intuitively.
Think reality-based. Think cutting-edge, real-world. Think virally-distributed. But don't think all three at the same time.
It sounds wonderful, but it's realistic!
What does it really mean to harness "super-magnetically"?
We think that most cross-media, subscriber-defined splash pages use far too much AJAX, and not enough PNG.
If all of this may seem stupefying to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be cross-platform or to be frictionless, reconfigurable?
The power to actualize robustly leads to the aptitude to leverage vertically.
Without adequate users, end-to-end e-tailers are forced to become real-time.
Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be collaborative?
We here at Sample Company believe we know that it is better to optimize iteravely than to disintermediate proactively.
Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for facilitating.
We realize that it is better to aggregate intuitively than to incentivize dynamically.
We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our M&A but our capability to seize.
Our technology takes the best features of XHTML and HTTP.
We will scale the commonly-accepted term "co-branded, end-to-end".
Without well-chosen e-markets, networks are forced to become real-time.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Apache and PGP.
Think customized. Think 24/7. Think wireless, sticky. But don't think all three at the same time.
We have proven we know that it is better to generate magnetically than to strategize robustly.
What does it really mean to generate "proactively"?
Think blog-based. Think B2C2B. Think front-end, back-end. But don't think all three at the same time.