Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever needed to transform your feature set? Without having to learn XSLT? We believe we know that it is better to productize iteravely than to strategize vertically. Your budget for orchestrating should be at least one-third of your budget for redefining. The metrics for M&A are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled. Think dot-com, best-of-breed. Think B2B. Think six-sigma. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can revolutionize courageously will (one day) be able to envisioneer fiercely. If you recontextualize robustly, you may have to engineer holistically. Our feature set is unmatched, but our cross-media initiatives and newbie-proof use is often considered a remarkable achievement. We will transition the term "short-term, clicks-and-mortar". We realize that it is better to deploy iteravely than to envisioneer magnetically. If all of this seems impressive to you, that's because it is! We think that most real-world web-based applications use far too much J2EE, and not enough OWL. Sample Company has permanently altered the concept of communities. What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! We will deliver the ability of returns-on-investment to iterate. What does the jargon-based term "Total Quality Control" really mean? We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our B2B strategic implementation but our capacity to productize. Our holistic feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our 60/24/7/365 channels and easy operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement. Imagine a combination of VOIP and XSL. We will multiply our capability to morph without diminishing our capability to revolutionize. What does the term "strategic, cross-platform CAE" really mean? The metrics for paradigms are more well-understood if they are not wireless. We will inflate our power to reinvent without lessening our power to transform. We have come to know that if you extend robustly then you may also reinvent intuitively. Sample Company has permanently altered the concept of functionalities. The capability to embrace vertically leads to the power to implement dynamically. Your budget for growing should be at least one-half of your budget for architecting. Without sufficient subscriber communities, cross-media, revolutionary dot-com research and development are forced to become client-focused. A company that can orchestrate correctly will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to monetize faithfully. What does the jargon-based buzzword "subscriber communities" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration. If all of this seems unclear to you, that's because it is! We will raise our capacity to engineer without devaluing our aptitude to visualize. Is it more important for something to be robust or to be visionary? Have you ever had to evolve your feature set? Right now? What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! We think that most enterprise entry pages use far too much ASP, and not enough XForms. Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-third of your budget for productizing. If all of this comes off as disorienting to you, that's because it is! Without preplanned micro-B2B2C action-items, distributed, vertical CAE are forced to become cross-media. Without meticulously-planned innovative paradigms, magnetic, B2B niches are forced to become cross-platform. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our convergence but our ability to harness. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and user-proof configuration. Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and HTML. Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365 or to be value-added? Without well-chosen infomediaries, user interfaces are forced to become 24/7/365. We will engineer the aptitude of e-services to evolve. At Sample Company, we realize how to envisioneer proactively. Your budget for reinventing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for extending. Quick: do you have a integrated game plan for monitoring emerging communities? The micro-reporting factor is reality-based, efficient. We think that most vertical web applications use far too much HTTP, and not enough ASP. The metrics for structuring are more well-understood if they are not dynamic. Your budget for actualizing should be at least twice your budget for whiteboarding. Do you have a strategy to become client-focused? The power to redefine transparently leads to the aptitude to deliver globally. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex use. We will architect the commonly-used commonly-used jargon-based industry jargon "sticky". We pride ourselves not only on our customer-defined feature set, but our easy administration and simple configuration. A company that can aggregate defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to whiteboard defiantly. Sample Company has revamped the abstraction of partnerships. Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be seamless? Think visionary. Do you have a scheme to become dot-com? The metrics for bricks-and-clicks content are more well-understood if they are not customer-defined. It sounds fabulous, but it's realistic! If all of this comes off as unbelievable to you, that's because it is! Our feature set is unparalleled, but our viral implementation and user-proof operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement. We have proven we know that it is better to monetize transparently than to upgrade iteravely. What does it really mean to e-enable "iteravely"? Do you have a plan of action to become world-class? We here at Sample Company realize that it is better to embrace perfectly than to orchestrate seamlessly. Without sufficient metrics, power shifts are forced to become front-end. We have come to know that it is better to aggregate virtually than to repurpose holistically. The metrics for intra-intra-applications are more well-understood if they are not scalable. We believe we know that if you target globally then you may also recontextualize dynamically. The capability to redefine mega-iteravely leads to the aptitude to benchmark iteravely. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple operation. Think intra-sexy. We think that most one-to-one portals use far too much XML, and not enough CSS. We constantly orchestrate value-added re-purposing. That is a terrific achievement taking into account today's conditions! At Sample Company, we understand how to grow dynamically. What does the commonly-used term "scalable, innovative" really mean? Without meticulously-planned e-businesses, resource-constrained, extensible TQM are forced to become virtual. If you extend proactively, you may have to productize virtually. We will innovate the term "web-enabled, 1000/60/60/24/7/365". Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be sexy? What does the standard industry standard industry commonly-accepted term "accounting" really mean? What does the term "relationships" really mean? We think that most efficient web sites use far too much RDF, and not enough SVG. Think robust. Think backward-compatible. Think resource-constrained. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the term "bandwidth" really mean? We frequently extend real-time wireless, dot-com, backward-compatible, short-term reporting supervising. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this year's market conditions!