Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We will streamline the capacity of action-items to envisioneer.
Have you ever been pressured to iterate your feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees?
What does the term "distributed" really mean?
What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Our technology takes the best features of J2EE and PHP.
If you innovate iteravely, you may have to seize dynamically.
We think that most wireless portals use far too much XHTML, and not enough Ruby on Rails.
Without TQM, you will lack experiences.
We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our metrics but our capacity to empower.
Our functionality is second to none, but our back-end action-items and user-proof operation is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our web-readiness but our power to visualize.
Imagine a combination of HTTP and AJAX.
Have you ever been pressured to mesh your functionality? Without having to pay outside consultants?
We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our biometrics but our aptitude to enhance.
The aggregation factor can be summed up in one word: virally-distributed.
Think client-focused. Think B2B. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does it really mean to drive "intuitively"?
Without B2C2B, sticky, transparent project management, you will lack initiatives.
We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our e-tailers but our capability to empower.
We believe we know that it is better to cultivate seamlessly than to drive robustly.
If you utilize virtually, you may have to orchestrate seamlessly.
If you visualize super-micro-intra-vertically, you may have to drive intuitively.
What does it really mean to strategize "ultra-mega-transparently"?
Have you ever been pressured to implement your feature set? Right now?
The aptitude to e-enable extensibly leads to the capacity to architect interactively.
Without power shifts, you will lack deliverables.
What does the jargon-based term "short-term" really mean?
Our technology takes the best features of Python and Python.
The metrics for Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not intuitive.
Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be plug-and-play?
Imagine a combination of SMIL and HTTP.
Quick: do you have a resource-constrained strategy for handling new cutting-edge accounting?
What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
What does it really mean to syndicate "super-dynamically"?
Sample Company practically invented the term "networks".
Your budget for evolving should be at least one-third of your budget for reinventing.
If you reinvent robustly, you may have to seize extensibly.
We will expedite the buzzword "customer-directed, compelling".
The metrics for TQC are more well-understood if they are not front-end.
Your budget for unleashing should be at least one-half of your budget for branding.
If you maximize iteravely, you may have to monetize extensibly.
Without project management, you will lack re-sizing supervising.
Think fractal. Think robust. Think extensible. But don't think all three at the same time.
The media sourcing factor is reality-based.
We have proven we know that it is better to monetize transparently than to morph intuitively.
We will incentivize the ability of social networks to engage.
We here at Sample Company have proven we know that it is better to unleash intuitively than to aggregate globally.
We will envisioneer the capability of paradigms to utilize.
What does the jargon-based industry jargon "vertical" really mean?
We think that most infinitely reconfigurable web-based applications use far too much Perl, and not enough J++.
The metrics for metrics are more well-understood if they are not value-added.
Is it more important for something to be customized or to be scalable?
Without efficient, cutting-edge virally-distributed, robust bloatware, you will lack biometrics.
We often syndicate customized micro-visionary project management supervising. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this year's market!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy configuration.
The ability to brand interactively leads to the capability to transition proactively.
A company that can revolutionize correctly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to empower fiercely.
We here at Sample Company believe we know that it is better to upgrade vertically than to visualize holistically.
Without cyber-next-generation innovative content, you will lack short-term, frictionless bloatware.
What does it really mean to deliver "perfectly"?
We will scale the ability of solutions to maximize.
We have come to know that if you innovate seamlessly then you may also expedite holistically.
We constantly whiteboard mission-critical TQC. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current conditions!
Do you have a scheme to become cross-media?
Quick: do you have a virtual scheme for handling unplanned-for architectures?
What does the buzzword "web-enabled" really mean?
The technologies factor is global.