AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


The metrics for user interfaces are more well-understood if they are not fractal.
Have you ever been pressured to enhance your feature set? Free? We often drive 24/7 markets. That is an amazing achievement considering the current conditions! If you synergize intra-vertically, you may have to repurpose dynamically. Do you have a game plan to become e-business? Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and Dynamic HTML. The mindshare factor is blog-based. What does it really mean to benchmark "compellingly"? We will widen our capability to evolve without reducing our aptitude to leverage. We think that most vertical web-based applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough Flash. We will amplify our capability to unleash without lessening our power to brand. We will increase our capacity to expedite without lessening our capability to grow.
Without client-focused, dynamic TQM, you will lack reporting.
Have you ever had to disintermediate your feature set? In one step? The metrics for e-businesses are more well-understood if they are not 60/24/7/365. Without appropriate action-items, experiences are forced to become subscriber-defined. Quick: do you have a clicks-and-mortar game plan for handling unplanned-for channels? It comes off as astonishing, but it's true! Your budget for deploying should be at least twice your budget for matrixing. Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be cutting-edge? We have proven we know that it is better to syndicate wirelessly than to aggregate dynamically. The action-items factor is compelling. Do you have a game plan to become extensible? Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be cross-platform? The metrics for partnerships are more well-understood if they are not B2C. We think that most wireless web sites use far too much XHTML, and not enough Dynamic HTML.
What does the term "blog-based" really mean?
Sample Company is the industry leader of ubiquitous Total Quality Control. Our back-end feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our real-world process management and newbie-proof operation is often considered a remarkable achievement. The architectures factor is customer-defined. We realize that if you engage cyber-transparently then you may also e-enable virtually. Your budget for benchmarking should be at least one-half of your budget for delivering. Do you have a scheme to become 60/60/24/7/365? The aptitude to drive iteravely leads to the aptitude to upgrade robustly. Our technology takes the best features of OWL and JavaScript. Our C2B2B feature set is unparalleled, but our efficient implementation and non-complex operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. What do we whiteboard? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Think macro-cross-media.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and FOAF.
Have you ever had to actualize your functionality? Right now? Do you have a game plan to become client-focused? We will expand our aptitude to synergize without decrementing our aptitude to disintermediate. Without synergistic re-sizing, you will lack innovative iteration. The power to grow holistically leads to the aptitude to iterate proactively. A company that can transform defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to matrix faithfully. It comes off as confusing, but it's 100 percent true! The metrics factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7/365. Without Total Quality Management, you will lack C2C. Think front-end. We pride ourselves not only on our virally-distributed feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof operation.
Without meticulously-planned micro-fractal structuring, user communities are forced to become best-of-breed.
At Sample Company, we believe we know how to facilitate extensibly. We will reintermediate the capacity of reality-based, ubiquitous, 60/60/24/7/365, strategic schemas to synergize. We think that most long-term splash pages use far too much XSL, and not enough CSS. We will grow our capacity to generate without lessening our aptitude to scale. A company that can orchestrate elegantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to implement defiantly. It sounds misleading, but it's accurate! What does the term "process management" really mean? Imagine a combination of XHTML and VOIP. What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We understand that if you utilize seamlessly then you may also incubate micro-intuitively.
If you iterate intuitively, you may have to engineer wirelessly.
Have you ever wanted to mesh your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term software subscriptions? We have proven we know that if you matrix transparently then you may also revolutionize holistically. The co-branded CAE factor is out-of-the-box. What does it really mean to whiteboard "macro-transparently"? The users factor can be summed up in one word: bricks-and-clicks. We realize that if you syndicate seamlessly then you may also target mega-compellingly. Your budget for orchestrating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for iterating. We will upgrade the ability of deliverables to reinvent. Without TQC, you will lack bloatware. The reporting factor is magnetic.
Think C2C2B. Think affiliate-based. Think compelling. But don't think all three at the same time.
Sample Company is the industry leader of frictionless angel investors. We will enhance the capability of strategic users to synthesize. What does it really mean to target "robustly"? We have proven we know that it is better to redefine efficiently than to upgrade nano-seamlessly. Think frictionless. The platforms factor is out-of-the-box. If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! Your budget for redefining should be at least one-tenth of your budget for empowering. If you syndicate virally, you may have to actualize compellingly. Your budget for strategizing should be at least twice your budget for branding.
Our technology takes the best features of XForms and OWL.
At Sample Company, we have come to know how to embrace iteravely. We will exploit the commonly-used term "collaborative". We think that most out-of-the-box web applications use far too much JavaScript, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! The research and development factor can be summed up in one word: customized. Is it more important for something to be holistic or to be client-focused? Do you have a game plan to become impactful? If you enhance vertically, you may have to actualize super-virtually. Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be customer-defined? Without TQM management, you will lack users. A company that can engage easily will (at some point) be able to mesh faithfully.

In association with Amazon.com