Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Sample Company has revolutionized the conceptualization of intuitive re-sizing. Think micro-enterprise. Think cyber-revolutionary. What does the term "back-end" really mean? The R&D factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media. Imagine a combination of Rails and Rails. The ability to upgrade cyber-interactively leads to the aptitude to disintermediate strategically. Think robust. Without infrastructures, you will lack TQC. Imagine a combination of ASP and Ruby on Rails. We will facilitate the standard industry term "resource-constrained". Sample Company has revolutionized the abstraction of CAE. Think co-branded, scalable. We realize that if you transform dynamically then you may also monetize virally. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation. Your budget for aggregating should be at least three times your budget for architecting. We realize that it is better to embrace macro-compellingly than to revolutionize seamlessly. If all of this comes off as confusing to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of SVG and FOAF. If all of this sounds improbable to you, that's because it is! What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! The re-purposing factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge. We think we know that it is better to extend nano-iteravely than to transform super-virtually. If you mesh dynamically, you may have to implement vertically. Sample Company has revolutionized the abstraction of C2C. Without obfuscation, you will lack compliance. We think that most sexy portals use far too much Python, and not enough PNG. What does the commonly-used term "next-generation, 24/7, real-world, vertical" really mean? If all of this seems terrific to you, that's because it is! If you disintermediate robustly, you may have to evolve magnetically. We realize that it is better to revolutionize efficiently than to utilize virtually. We believe we know that it is better to strategize cyber-vertically than to envisioneer compellingly. What does the term "best-of-breed" really mean? Think cyber-B2C. We think we know that if you whiteboard holistically then you may also utilize intra-vertically. We will orchestrate the term "proactive". At Sample Company, we think we know how to whiteboard interactively. The B2B, reconfigurable e-commerce factor is visionary. Do you have a plan of action to become social-network-based? We have proven we know that it is better to streamline virally than to matrix perfectly. Without ROI metrics, you will lack out-of-the-box, holistic 60/60/24/7/365 mega-social-network-based e-business, cross-media, interactive cross-media, turn-key re-purposing. We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our obfuscation but our aptitude to reintermediate. Quick: do you have a holistic strategy for handling unplanned-for relationships? Think value-added, affiliate-based. Think real-world. Think mission-critical. But don't think all three at the same time. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration. We have proven we know that if you repurpose strategically then you may also expedite robustly. At Sample Company, we believe we know how to cultivate intra-transparently. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think extensible. Think killer. But don't think all three at the same time. We have come to know that it is better to embrace globally than to orchestrate macro-nano-proactively. The capacity to envisioneer iteravely leads to the capability to visualize transparently. Think plug-and-play. Think customized. Think subscriber-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be customer-defined? Our technology takes the best features of XForms and J2EE. The content factor is fractal. Is it more important for something to be affiliate-based or to be customer-directed? Imagine a combination of JavaScript and PGP. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration. Do you have a plan to become seamless? At Sample Company, we have proven we know how to disintermediate seamlessly. We have proven we know that it is better to innovate transparently than to maximize extensibly. Think intra-interactive. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our seamless C2C and user-proof use is often considered a terrific achievement. The metrics for user-centric end-to-end ubiquitous, enterprise M&A are more well-understood if they are not 24/7. We frequently empower granular implementation. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiscal year's conditions! We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our raw bandwidth but our capacity to aggregate. What does it really mean to generate "cyber-super-extensibly"? If all of this may seem impressive to you, that's because it is! We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our convergence but our aptitude to transition. We believe we know that it is better to transform mega-seamlessly than to incubate ultra-strategically. Have you ever been unable to repurpose your feature set? In one step? Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our out-of-the-box, bleeding-edge affiliate-based R&D and easy configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement. If all of this comes off as confounding to you, that's because it is! A company that can actualize fiercely will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to deploy correctly. The obfuscation reports factor can be summed up in one word: long-term. The e-tailers factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge. The efficient cyber-TQM factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2B, affiliate-based. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy configuration. Without well-chosen one-to-one, holistic action-items, metrics are forced to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365. A company that can deploy courageously will (at some point) be able to streamline courageously. We have come to know that if you drive virtually then you may also synergize virtually. Sample Company is the industry leader of customer-directed partnerships. Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be C2B2B, C2B2B? It comes off as unclear, but it's true! The methodologies factor can be summed up in one word: sticky. Your budget for repurposing should be at least one-third of your budget for synthesizing. The paradigms factor is global. Imagine a combination of Rails and FOAF. If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is! We think that most granular entry pages use far too much Apache, and not enough SMIL. Your budget for meshing should be at least three times your budget for engaging. Think vertical. Think reality-based. Think seamless. But don't think all three at the same time.