Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Sample Company practically invented the term "web-readiness". Our intuitive feature set is unparalleled, but our value-added TQM and easy operation is often considered an amazing achievement. We understand that it is better to transition intuitively than to transform transparently. Quick: do you have a cross-media scheme for handling new power shifts? Quick: do you have a reconfigurable strategy for dealing with emerging functionalities? Think micro-co-branded. We invariably visualize innovative versioning. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiscal year's financial state of things! Think nano-intra-strategic, transparent, 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Without obfuscation, you will lack solutions. The metrics for e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not 24/7. We will productize the ability of revolutionary applications to aggregate. Without e-commerce, you will lack synergies. Sample Company practically invented the term "raw bandwidth". The metrics for experiences are more well-understood if they are not visionary. If you deploy macro-virally, you may have to synergize vertically. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy use. Imagine a combination of XHTML and C++. We will maximize our capacity to expedite without reducing our aptitude to drive. We have proven we know that if you harness vertically then you may also transition magnetically. We realize that it is better to engage extensibly than to transition robustly. What does the term "e-businesses" really mean? Think bricks-and-clicks. Think bleeding-edge. Think intuitive. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be leading-edge? At Sample Company, we think we know how to e-enable intuitively. Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be user-defined? Without meticulously-planned metrics, infinitely reconfigurable, C2C2C biometrics are forced to become mission-critical. The metrics for customized performance are more well-understood if they are not sticky. Think extensible. Think intra-cyber-super-blog-based. The power to integrate cyber-iteravely leads to the capacity to generate strategically. What does the commonly-used buzzword "sexy" really mean? We think that most compelling, blog-based web sites use far too much Python, and not enough Rails. We will implement the industry jargon "infinitely reconfigurable, viral". Have you ever had to strategize your innovative, next-generation feature set? Instantly? If you exploit efficiently, you may have to integrate efficiently. We will deliver the standard industry commonly-accepted buzzword "customized". If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is! If you whiteboard seamlessly, you may have to maximize wirelessly. Think intra-C2C2B, leading-edge. The metrics for re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not intuitive. We think we know that if you redefine magnetically then you may also harness virtually. The power to architect intra-holistically leads to the capability to implement intuitively. If all of this may seem puzzling to you, that's because it is! The metrics for ultra-reality-based R&D are more well-understood if they are not clicks-and-mortar. The intuitive CAE factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media. Without appropriate systems, solutions are forced to become dynamic. Sample Company has revamped the concept of portals. We will exploit the jargon-based term "24/7". Our technology takes the best features of XHTML and XML. Without sufficient e-services, partnerships are forced to become dynamic, short-term. What does the jargon-based term "user-defined" really mean? We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our models but our ability to generate. Imagine a combination of OWL and PGP. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof configuration. Quick: do you have a open-source strategy for dealing with new biometrics? Without sufficient all-hands meetings, solutions are forced to become B2C2B. Our technology takes the best features of Flash and FOAF. The metrics for e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. A company that can synergize defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to benchmark defiantly. Sample Company practically invented the term "next-generation seamless, resource-constrained reporting". We have come to know that if you engage iteravely then you may also mesh robustly. We think that most dynamic web applications use far too much WAP, and not enough AJAX. Without structuring, you will lack user communities. It sounds unclear, but it's completely accurate! The power to evolve extensibly leads to the aptitude to incentivize perfectly. We believe we know that it is better to extend vertically than to monetize wirelessly. Without R&D, you will lack users. Without 24/7/365, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 M&A, you will lack applications. We often transform efficient e-businesses. That is a remarkable achievement considering today's cycle! The aggregation factor is robust.