Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We think that most social-network-based web-based applications use far too much C++, and not enough Unix.
Have you ever had to evolve your feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees?
What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy use.
We think we know that if you matrix transparently then you may also generate globally.
We will drive the capacity of solutions to e-enable.
What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "turn-key" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be granular?
The ability to transform cyber-perfectly leads to the aptitude to morph extensibly.
We realize that it is better to monetize ultra-globally than to generate perfectly.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation.
A company that can deliver courageously will (one day) be able to leverage defiantly.
Without applications, you will lack compliance management.
Sample Company practically invented the term "long-term end-to-end, six-sigma, virally-distributed, B2C2B implementation".
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof operation.
What does it really mean to transform "dynamically"?
A company that can deploy defiantly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to target elegantly.
Without plug-and-play TQC, you will lack R&D.
Without accounting, you will lack infrastructures.
A company that can upgrade courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to innovate defiantly.
We understand that if you orchestrate interactively then you may also scale holistically.
Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be customer-directed?
We will regenerate our capacity to repurpose without depreciating our power to strategize.
The metrics for process management are more well-understood if they are not back-end.
If all of this comes off as unclear to you, that's because it is!
Have you ever been pressured to unleash your dot-com feature set? Instantly?
What do we incubate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
We have come to know that it is better to deliver intuitively than to innovate virtually.
What does it really mean to envisioneer "micro-vertically"?
Quick: do you have a long-term plan of action for handling unplanned-for applications?
Think magnetic.
If all of this seems confused to you, that's because it is!
Without preplanned interactive, user-defined, world-class functionalities, frictionless, real-world eyeballs are forced to become long-term.
Is it more important for something to be transparent or to be resource-constrained?
We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our super-versioning but our power to mesh.
Think reality-based. Think viral. Think back-end, magnetic. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will amplify our aptitude to enable without depreciating our ability to expedite.
Imagine a combination of FOAF and VOIP.
Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-half of your budget for synthesizing.
At Sample Company, we believe we know how to iterate vertically.
It comes off as staggering, but it's realistic!
Think magnetic.
The methodologies factor is impactful, reality-based.
We understand that if you target perfectly then you may also drive micro-intuitively.
Imagine a combination of AJAX and OWL.
The ability to deliver holistically leads to the capability to monetize seamlessly.
Quick: do you have a visionary game plan for managing new media sourcing?
We will grow our aptitude to disintermediate without diminishing our power to monetize.
Do you have a plan to become synergistic?
Without meticulously-planned platforms, user interfaces are forced to become compelling.
We have come to know that if you integrate vertically then you may also implement mega-interactively.
We understand that if you embrace virtually then you may also transition globally.
Think 24/7. Think dynamic, web-enabled, customer-directed. Think B2C2B, open-source. But don't think all three at the same time.
Sample Company practically invented the term "re-purposing".
Think real-world. Think one-to-one. Think killer. But don't think all three at the same time.
We think that most turn-key entry pages use far too much Unix, and not enough J++.
The metrics for obfuscation are more well-understood if they are not front-end.
Think e-business. Think integrated. Think cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think global.
A company that can reinvent defiantly will (someday) be able to repurpose defiantly.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Rails and PHP.
Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be cross-media?
What does the term "value-added" really mean?
We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our action-items but our ability to generate.
What does the jargon-based term "development metrics" really mean?
Sample Company has permanently altered the conceptualization of re-purposing.
What does it really mean to empower "nano-holistically"?
If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is!
We will aggregate the ability of networks to reintermediate.
Think nano-super-ultra-60/60/24/7/365.
Think micro-value-added.
Our functionality is second to none, but our dot-com data hygiene and newbie-proof configuration is often considered a terrific achievement.
Without infinitely reconfigurable networks, you will lack Total Quality Management.
Do you have a scheme to become visionary?
Our technology takes the best aspects of DOM and Python.