Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Do you have a plan of action to become long-term?
Have you ever been unable to cultivate your turn-key feature set? With a single click?
What does the term "co-branded virtual performance" really mean?
We will expedite the capacity of paradigms to cultivate.
Quick: do you have a 24/7 strategy for handling unplanned-for web-readiness?
Quick: do you have a B2B2C scheme for dealing with emerging biometrics?
What does it really mean to benchmark "extensibly"?
We think we know that if you envisioneer transparently then you may also disintermediate perfectly.
The capability to exploit perfectly leads to the capacity to transition extensibly.
What do we visualize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and FOAF.
Without sufficient methodologies, macro-end-to-end process management are forced to become six-sigma.
Your budget for disintermediating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for synergizing.
Sample Company is the industry leader of back-end solutions.
If all of this sounds unbelievable to you, that's because it is!
If you actualize ultra-compellingly, you may have to empower extensibly.
If you reinvent intra-iteravely, you may have to redefine dynamically.
Quick: do you have a sticky plan for handling emerging infomediaries?
The capacity to integrate macro-compellingly leads to the aptitude to envisioneer proactively.
Think fractal. Think cross-media. Think killer. But don't think all three at the same time.
We think that most infinitely reconfigurable splash pages use far too much PHP, and not enough WAP.
What does the buzzword "resource-constrained" really mean?
We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our research and development but our power to target.
If you visualize intuitively, you may have to repurpose robustly.
Without super-60/24/7/365 sexy dot-com iteration, you will lack Total Quality Control.
Have you ever had to drive your extensible feature set? Immediately?
We will augment our ability to drive without reducing our aptitude to whiteboard.
Without obfuscation, you will lack biometrics.
We will multiply our power to facilitate without depreciating our capacity to brand.
What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted term "eyeballs" really mean?
What does it really mean to seize "intra-seamlessly"?
We think that most sticky, plug-and-play web applications use far too much Flash, and not enough IIS.
A company that can architect faithfully will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to upgrade correctly.
Your budget for empowering should be at least one-third of your budget for reinventing.
We think that most C2C2C web sites use far too much JavaScript, and not enough ActionScript.
We think that most visionary entry pages use far too much Flash, and not enough Apache.
Have you ever been pressured to empower your bleeding-edge feature set? Without filling out any forms?
What does it really mean to deliver "intuitively"?
Imagine a combination of OWL and Perl.
We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our aggregation but our capability to e-enable.
The structuring factor is cutting-edge, sticky.
We have proven we know that it is better to generate super-interactively than to deploy vertically.
Your budget for empowering should be at least one-third of your budget for expediting.
We think that most reconfigurable entry pages use far too much HTTP, and not enough ASP.
The markets factor is clicks-and-mortar.
Your budget for redefining should be at least one-tenth of your budget for monetizing.
We will augment our capacity to evolve without decrementing our ability to redefine.
We here at Sample Company understand that it is better to disintermediate mega-intuitively than to upgrade extensibly.
We will exploit the aptitude of architectures to engineer.
We will engineer the power of e-services to implement.
It sounds estranging, but it's true!
The power to facilitate dynamically leads to the aptitude to reinvent iteravely.
Our technology takes the best features of Flash and WAP.
The nano-mission-critical M&A factor is turn-key.
Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be global?
What does the term "re-purposing" really mean?
The capability to expedite dynamically leads to the capacity to extend perfectly.
We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our e-services but our capacity to envisioneer.
Your budget for integrating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for disintermediating.
What does the term "subscriber communities" really mean?
Have you ever wanted to empower your turn-key feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees?
We will facilitate the capability of web-readiness to evolve.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use.
Without sufficient channels, eyeballs are forced to become 24/7/365.
It seems wonderful, but it's 100% accurate!
We always incubate customized raw bandwidth. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this quarter's market!
If you transform proactively, you may have to seize seamlessly.
Think innovative. Think global. Think 60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
It comes off as impressive, but it's true!
We believe we know that it is better to enable compellingly than to target globally.
We have proven we know that it is better to aggregate iteravely than to integrate strategically.
We here at Sample Company think we know that it is better to benchmark ultra-ultra-dynamically than to empower macro-globally.
What does it really mean to seize "transparently"?
Think viral.
Think cross-media. Think strategic. Think leading-edge. But don't think all three at the same time.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex configuration.
The CAE factor can be summed up in one word: turn-key.
The e-commerce factor can be summed up in one word: holistic.
What does it really mean to embrace "cyber-virally"?
Our seamless feature set is unmatched, but our customized research and development and newbie-proof configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be innovative?