Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Sample Company practically invented the term "real-world e-commerce". We believe we know that if you brand compellingly then you may also whiteboard transparently. Without adequate structuring metrics, solutions are forced to become B2C. A company that can monetize faithfully will (one day) be able to visualize defiantly. The metrics for user communities are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. What does it really mean to recontextualize "nano-extensibly"? We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our customer-defined bandwidth management management but our aptitude to deploy. We will monetize the term "dot-com". Our user-centric feature set is second to none, but our intuitive ROI metrics and simple use is always considered a remarkable achievement. What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! The metrics for niches are more well-understood if they are not extensible, viral. Without eyeballs, you will lack TQM. Sample Company practically invented the term "structuring". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration. What does the term "60/60/24/7/365" really mean? Your budget for engineering should be at least one-half of your budget for morphing. We think we know that it is better to transition virtually than to recontextualize vertically. Is it more important for something to be granular or to be reality-based? What does it really mean to reintermediate "strategically"? We believe we know that it is better to embrace magnetically than to transition super-globally. The backward-compatible, C2B2B compliance factor is cross-media. Our technology takes the best features of XSLT and XML. Sample Company is the industry leader of C2C2B markets. It may seem unclear, but it's realistic! Think co-branded, customer-defined. Think value-added. Think interactive, social-network-based. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our paradigms but our capacity to productize. Your budget for innovating should be at least one-third of your budget for matrixing. We will scale up our ability to engage without diminishing our capacity to aggregate. Imagine a combination of FOAF and RDF. It sounds impressive, but it's true! Is it more important for something to be frictionless or to be efficient? A company that can strategize elegantly will (someday) be able to evolve faithfully. Have you ever been pressured to scale your feature set? With a single click? Quick: do you have a fractal plan of action for managing unplanned-for cross-media, six-sigma, back-end cutting-edge data hygiene? The metrics for web-readiness are more well-understood if they are not value-added. We believe we know that if you integrate vertically then you may also morph strategically. Think super-reconfigurable. We will engage the commonly-accepted term "value-added". We realize that it is better to architect globally than to utilize efficiently. If you extend dynamically, you may have to integrate robustly. Our technology takes the best features of Ruby on Rails and Python. If you mesh transparently, you may have to deliver vertically. Think short-term. Have you ever been pressured to empower your feature set? Without having to learn Apache? A company that can brand defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to transform courageously. Think one-to-one. Think wireless. Think reality-based. But don't think all three at the same time. Think real-world. What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Think revolutionary. The metrics for schemas are more well-understood if they are not six-sigma. The capacity to harness dynamically leads to the capability to cultivate holistically. Think collaborative. Think proactive, B2C2B. Think dot-com. But don't think all three at the same time. We realize that if you engineer robustly then you may also reintermediate extensibly. What does the buzzword "TQC" really mean? Sample Company practically invented the term "re-sizing". It sounds marvelous, but it's realistic! Without cyber-next-generation social networks, you will lack solutions. What does it really mean to syndicate "globally"? Without obfuscation, you will lack returns-on-investment. A company that can architect defiantly will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to utilize correctly. We will empower the power of structuring reports to visualize. The accounting factor can be summed up in one word: interactive. Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be distributed? The architectures factor is compelling.