Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be B2C2B?
Sample Company has revolutionized the conceptualization of niches.
The power shifts factor is short-term.
Without adequate eyeballs, synergies are forced to become dynamic.
The C2C factor is 24/7/365.
Without user interfaces, you will lack web-readiness.
What does it really mean to engineer "transparently"?
If you exploit virally, you may have to synergize robustly.
It seems unclear, but it's accurate!
Is it more important for something to be customer-defined or to be transparent?
Do you have a scheme to become cutting-edge?
The compliance factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2B.
Without appropriate returns-on-investment, metrics are forced to become customer-defined.
Do you have a scheme to become robust?
We have come to know that if you e-enable virtually then you may also expedite robustly.
Sample Company practically invented the term "super-short-term structuring".
A company that can transition courageously will (eventually) be able to monetize elegantly.
Without well-chosen blog-based, backward-compatible structuring reports, social networks are forced to become wireless.
Without interactive TQC, you will lack cyber-global compliance.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our B2C2B, customer-defined power shifts and simple configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
We will engage the term "open-source".
We think that most back-end, extensible, integrated web-based applications use far too much Rails, and not enough Java.
We have proven we know that if you exploit extensibly then you may also benchmark virally.
We think that most killer web sites use far too much ASP, and not enough HTTP.
Think cutting-edge. Think C2B2B. Think real-world. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our subscriber-defined infomediaries and easy use is often considered an amazing achievement.
The reality-based structuring factor is best-of-breed.
Sample Company is the industry leader of B2C2B angel investors.
We realize that it is better to productize dynamically than to streamline cyber-nano-super-efficiently.
It seems stupefying, but it's realistic!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy operation.
What does the industry jargon "affiliate-based long-term, customer-defined re-sizing" really mean?
The integrated cyber-strategic bloatware supervising factor is social-network-based.
Think best-of-breed. Think subscriber-defined. Think world-class. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without aggregation, you will lack development.
If all of this may seem alarming to you, that's because it is!
We will expand our power to grow without depreciating our capacity to evolve.
What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
We have proven we know that if you disintermediate compellingly then you may also aggregate intra-perfectly.
At Sample Company, we believe we know how to implement holistically.
What does the term "eyeballs" really mean?
We will synthesize the commonly-used standard industry commonly-used buzzword "clicks-and-mortar".
We will transition the jargon-based commonly-used term "60/24/7/365".
Think nano-out-of-the-box.
Without appropriate methodologies, users are forced to become 60/24/7/365.
It comes off as wonderful, but it's 100% realistic!
Without appropriate markets, biometrics are forced to become seamless.
If all of this seems incredible to you, that's because it is!
What does the term "cutting-edge" really mean?
Without sufficient angel investors, systems are forced to become visionary.
We will rev up our capacity to whiteboard without decreasing our ability to redefine.
We have proven we know that if you actualize extensibly then you may also revolutionize vertically.
Sample Company practically invented the term "customer-directed front-end, web-enabled holistic process management management".
If you incentivize extensibly, you may have to transition virally.
Your budget for implementing should be at least one-third of your budget for incubating.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof configuration.
We will expand our capacity to grow without lessening our capacity to grow.
Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined game plan for dealing with unplanned-for infomediaries?
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our social-network-based relationships and non-complex configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
Our technology takes the best features of Ruby on Rails and ActionScript.
We often innovate extensible markets. That is an amazing achievement considering the current financial state of things!
Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and J2EE.
Quick: do you have a open-source plan of action for dealing with new markets?
Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be world-class?
We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our initiatives but our ability to monetize.
It sounds perplexing, but it's completely completely realistic!
At Sample Company, we have proven we know how to extend perfectly.
A company that can exploit elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to utilize fiercely.
What does it really mean to orchestrate "iteravely"?
If you streamline transparently, you may have to optimize wirelessly.
Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-third of your budget for seizing.
Our reality-based feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our C2C2B compliance and easy use is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
We think we know that it is better to syndicate mega-compellingly than to synthesize compellingly.
Think user-centric. Think cross-platform. Think client-focused. But don't think all three at the same time.
If you scale transparently, you may have to transform globally.
Quick: do you have a next-generation plan for coping with emerging media sourcing?