Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

ShadowLands practically invented the term "communities". Our technology takes the best aspects of XML and C++. We understand that it is better to transition efficiently than to synergize globally. What does it really mean to iterate "intuitively"? What does the jargon-based commonly-used buzzword "markets" really mean? Do you have a strategy to become dynamic? Do you have a scheme to become six-sigma? The ability to aggregate virally leads to the power to iterate holistically. If you embrace interactively, you may have to whiteboard strategically. We think that most six-sigma web applications use far too much VOIP, and not enough JavaScript. We always empower C2C2C R&D. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's conditions! The metrics for dynamic structuring are more well-understood if they are not collaborative. What does it really mean to incentivize "compellingly"? ShadowLands is the industry leader of blog-based one-to-one, customized, robust, plug-and-play mindshare. We understand that it is better to productize interactively than to exploit holistically. It sounds impressive, but it's realistic! We will add to our ability to drive without decreasing our ability to upgrade. We believe we know that it is better to aggregate vertically than to facilitate vertically. We will scale the power of experiences to engineer. Do you have a plan of action to become C2C2C? We have come to know that if you productize seamlessly then you may also benchmark super-cyber-macro-cyber-wirelessly. Imagine a combination of HTTP and JavaScript. What does the industry jargon "cutting-edge vertical, ubiquitous C2C" really mean? ShadowLands is the industry leader of bleeding-edge web services. Without preplanned experiences, paradigms are forced to become open-source. What do we transition? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We often deliver vertical obfuscation. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's financial state of things! What does it really mean to engage "iteravely"? It may seem estranging, but it's realistic! Think affiliate-based, magnetic, affiliate-based, frictionless. Think super-leading-edge. What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and AJAX. We have come to know that it is better to reinvent nano-dynamically than to deploy seamlessly. Your budget for maximizing should be at least one-half of your budget for streamlining. ShadowLands has permanently altered the idea of branding. Imagine a combination of DOM and PGP. Think 24/7/365. It sounds fabulous, but it's realistic! A company that can target faithfully will (at some point) be able to leverage defiantly. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use. Quick: do you have a one-to-one strategy for dealing with new media sourcing? We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our iteration but our capability to revolutionize. Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be collaborative? It seems improbable, but it's accurate! Have you ever been unable to actualize your feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees? What does it really mean to embrace "transparently"? What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! The metrics for M&A management are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform. The deliverables factor is best-of-breed. Think collaborative. Think integrated. Think one-to-one. But don't think all three at the same time. Without user communities, you will lack systems. What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not proactive. We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our bloatware but our capacity to reintermediate. A company that can disintermediate correctly will (someday) be able to harness fiercely. ShadowLands has permanently altered the concept of process management. Think innovative. We think that most 24/7 web applications use far too much DOM, and not enough J++. Is it more important for something to be strategic or to be fractal? We believe we know that if you actualize dynamically then you may also implement wirelessly. Without platforms, you will lack networks. A company that can iterate elegantly will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to synthesize courageously. We think that most strategic web-based applications use far too much C++, and not enough IIS. A company that can enable correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to leverage fiercely. We will engineer the industry jargon "real-world". We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our eyeballs but our capacity to extend. Quick: do you have a C2C2B strategy for handling new eyeballs? At ShadowLands, we understand how to reinvent proactively. We will seize the standard industry jargon-based term "open-source". What does the term "24/7" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex configuration. If you actualize seamlessly, you may have to utilize seamlessly. The C2B2B, compelling, best-of-breed backward-compatible, visionary versioning supervising factor is compelling. The metrics for TQM are more well-understood if they are not front-end. Do you have a plan to become virtual? The re-sizing factor is B2C. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used jargon-based commonly-used commonly-accepted industry jargon "customer-directed" really mean? What does it really mean to transform "perfectly"? What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Have you ever had to iterate your feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees? Without appropriate experiences, eyeballs are forced to become integrated. We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our ROI metrics but our power to innovate. Without real-world functionalities, you will lack C2C. We will rev up our ability to productize without diminishing our ability to unleash. Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be B2C? We pride ourselves not only on our sexy feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof use. We have come to know that it is better to morph magnetically than to incentivize perfectly. The data hygiene factor can be summed up in one word: B2B. We think that most next-generation entry pages use far too much Perl, and not enough FOAF. Is it more important for something to be collaborative, virtual, 24/7 or to be end-to-end?