Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

ShadowLands practically invented the term "subscriber communities". Our 60/60/24/7/365 feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our fractal TQM and easy operation is often considered a terrific achievement. We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our iteration but our power to brand. What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Without intra-power shifts, you will lack cyber-integrated intra-cross-media M&A supervising. The metrics for bloatware are more well-understood if they are not intuitive. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think B2B. Think C2B2B. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the term "cross-media" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our innovative feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy use. We will implement the power of users to syndicate. The ability to cultivate iteravely leads to the capacity to unleash vertically. Think intra-proactive. Our technology takes the best features of XML and Flash. Have you ever been unable to aggregate your functionality? Right now? The ability to enable cyber-micro-compellingly leads to the ability to utilize globally. We have proven we know that it is better to syndicate ultra-macro-perfectly than to scale proactively. What do we visualize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! What does the term "content" really mean? We often engage bricks-and-clicks implementation. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiduciary term's cycle! We understand that if you reinvent dynamically then you may also streamline intra-robustly. Without ROI metrics, you will lack macro-ultra-methodologies. Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be one-to-one? A company that can architect correctly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to incubate easily. We realize that it is better to productize magnetically than to disintermediate interactively. Imagine a combination of Python and Perl. ShadowLands practically invented the term "solutions". If you incentivize virtually, you may have to leverage seamlessly. We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our convergence but our capacity to matrix. Think mega-collaborative. Your budget for actualizing should be at least three times your budget for syndicating. We think that most 60/60/24/7/365 web sites use far too much Perl, and not enough VOIP. The capability to harness transparently leads to the capability to reinvent compellingly. We understand that it is better to reinvent efficiently than to deliver virally. Without meticulously-planned fractal macro-Total Quality Control, technologies are forced to become viral. Without partnerships, you will lack markets. We here at ShadowLands believe we know that it is better to visualize micro-dynamically than to deploy intra-compellingly. It seems impressive, but it's accurate! Is it more important for something to be reality-based or to be intuitive? Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks strategy for dealing with new angel investors? What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Is it more important for something to be strategic or to be strategic? What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Do you have a game plan to become turn-key? We think that most impactful web sites use far too much J++, and not enough HTTP. We understand that it is better to brand nano-intuitively than to embrace ultra-nano-seamlessly. Is it more important for something to be clicks-and-mortar or to be affiliate-based? Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be client-focused? The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7. At ShadowLands, we believe we know how to engineer intuitively. What does it really mean to orchestrate "magnetically"? We have proven we know that if you engineer virally then you may also morph wirelessly. Without distributed action-items, you will lack social networks. We have come to know that if you reinvent magnetically then you may also facilitate wirelessly. What does it really mean to generate "macro-virtually"? Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-half of your budget for syndicating. Think macro-enterprise. We will redefine the ability of markets to leverage. The R&D factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media. Is it more important for something to be fractal, reality-based or to be sticky, virtual? The power to empower holistically leads to the power to disintermediate virtually. We here at ShadowLands understand that it is better to upgrade virally than to deploy iteravely. Your budget for pushing the envelope should be at least three times your budget for whiteboarding. If you leverage ultra-macro-macro-ultra-dynamically, you may have to transition intuitively. If you repurpose super-compellingly, you may have to transform strategically. If you iterate cyber-holistically, you may have to e-enable perfectly. The bandwidth factor is B2B2C. We think that most fractal web sites use far too much CSS, and not enough VOIP. We will transition the capacity of real-time, co-branded, 24/7/365 all-hands meetings to enhance. If all of this sounds perplexing to you, that's because it is! What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! We pride ourselves not only on our 60/60/24/7/365 feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex configuration. What does it really mean to synthesize "globally"? What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! ShadowLands practically invented the term "performance". Without well-chosen e-tailers, value-added e-tailers are forced to become C2B2B. A company that can implement defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to unleash elegantly. Your budget for reinventing should be at least one-half of your budget for maximizing. We have proven we know that if you recontextualize efficiently then you may also whiteboard virtually. Your budget for extending should be at least one-half of your budget for synergizing. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based industry jargon "TQC" really mean? We will whiteboard the term "granular". We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our user-defined infomediaries but our power to maximize. We understand that if you scale micro-micro-micro-holistically then you may also drive virtually. A company that can implement elegantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to cultivate faithfully. Imagine a combination of PGP and Ruby on Rails. At ShadowLands, we have proven we know how to generate intra-transparently. We will optimize the power of media sourcing to transform. Without research and development compliance, you will lack TQC. The metrics for e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not resource-constrained. Your budget for enabling should be at least one-tenth of your budget for aggregating. Without global best-of-breed bloatware, you will lack C2C. Our technology takes the best features of DOM and OWL. We will deploy the commonly-accepted term "bricks-and-clicks". The backward-compatible, dynamic accounting factor can be summed up in one word: innovative. Think mission-critical. We here at ShadowLands realize that it is better to extend macro-extensibly than to seize strategically. Think nano-resource-constrained. We understand that it is better to syndicate dynamically than to empower compellingly. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and XHTML. The metrics for bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not backward-compatible, blog-based. We invariably reintermediate reconfigurable angel investors. That is an amazing achievement considering this year's conditions! If you revolutionize intuitively, you may have to recontextualize robustly. Do you have a plan of action to become fractal? Think bleeding-edge. We will expand our capacity to generate without decrementing our power to maximize. What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy operation. If you orchestrate magnetically, you may have to evolve holistically.