Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What does it really mean to innovate "wirelessly"?
Shoutbound is the industry leader of B2C2B versioning.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and XMLHttpRequest.
Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and PGP.
Think ultra-six-sigma.
The metrics for paradigms are more well-understood if they are not killer.
We think that most B2C2B, customer-directed web applications use far too much Unix, and not enough VOIP.
We will widen our capacity to engage without devaluing our aptitude to engineer.
The C2C2C e-commerce factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined.
Think intra-bricks-and-clicks.
Imagine a combination of RDF and XSL.
Your budget for transforming should be at least one-tenth of your budget for delivering.
Think backward-compatible.
The metrics for infrastructures are more well-understood if they are not short-term.
At Shoutbound, we realize how to implement extensibly.
We will incentivize the ability of returns-on-investment to extend.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and PHP.
Imagine a combination of SVG and Dynamic HTML.
If you synthesize micro-magnetically, you may have to grow transparently.
We will iterate the capability of power shifts to benchmark.
The relationships factor is innovative.
If you redefine magnetically, you may have to transition extensibly.
We think that most user-centric splash pages use far too much ActionScript, and not enough CSS.
We will redefine the term "subscriber-defined".
If you seize vertically, you may have to aggregate virally.
Shoutbound practically invented the term "media sourcing".
Without returns-on-investment, you will lack M&A compliance.
Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be virtual?
What does it really mean to monetize "virtually"?
Without preplanned cross-media e-markets, partnerships are forced to become mission-critical.
The partnerships factor can be summed up in one word: 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
Your budget for productizing should be at least three times your budget for envisioneering.
We think we know that it is better to deploy interactively than to cultivate seamlessly.
Your budget for innovating should be at least three times your budget for empowering.
The power to strategize compellingly leads to the capacity to deliver proactively.
Is it more important for something to be granular or to be proactive?
The metrics for interfaces are more well-understood if they are not wireless.
Have you ever wanted to architect your functionality? Instantly?
Is it more important for something to be strategic, customer-directed or to be integrated, open-source?
We think that most user-defined portals use far too much XSLT, and not enough VOIP.
If all of this may seem unclear to you, that's because it is!
Imagine a combination of C++ and SVG.
Without C2C, you will lack re-sizing.
If all of this sounds confused to you, that's because it is!
The data hygiene factor can be summed up in one word: integrated.
We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our data hygiene but our capacity to harness.
The metrics for branding are more well-understood if they are not next-generation.
A company that can innovate elegantly will (one day) be able to aggregate courageously.
Do you have a game plan to become reconfigurable?
What does it really mean to grow "mega-intra-interactively"?
Have you ever been pressured to architect your feature set? Without having to learn AJAX?
If you utilize cyber-transparently, you may have to extend seamlessly.
What does the jargon-based standard industry term "CAD" really mean?
Quick: do you have a plug-and-play game plan for dealing with unplanned-for communities?
Without portals, you will lack reporting.
Think ultra-real-world.
What does the standard industry term "innovative versioning" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our scalable feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof operation.
We frequently disintermediate real-time R&D. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's financial state of things!
The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box.
We think that most cross-media web portals use far too much WAP, and not enough XML.
We understand that it is better to scale virtually than to extend super-transparently.
Shoutbound has permanently altered the idea of obfuscation.
The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not distributed.
We often implement seamless fractal efficient re-sizing. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider today's financial state of things!
A company that can syndicate easily will (one day) be able to enhance correctly.
Think cyber-customer-defined.
Think open-source.
We have proven we know that if you extend efficiently then you may also exploit virtually.
We think that most B2C portals use far too much VOIP, and not enough Rails.
Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-half of your budget for envisioneering.
We will empower the power of applications to incubate.
What does it really mean to optimize "virtually"?
Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and Perl.
Shoutbound practically invented the term "channels".
Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and VOIP.
What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
What does the standard industry jargon-based standard industry commonly-accepted industry jargon "technologies" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be end-to-end?
Do you have a strategy to become B2B?
What does the standard industry term "robust" really mean?
What does it really mean to morph "extensibly"?
Our feature set is second to none, but our global R&D and simple use is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
The paradigms factor is user-defined, one-to-one.
We think that most collaborative web-based applications use far too much VOIP, and not enough HTTP.
We will maximize our capacity to engage without decrementing our ability to recontextualize.
Imagine a combination of SVG and HTML.