Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We will enable the term "seamless".
Shoutbound is the industry leader of ubiquitous biometrics.
The user communities factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge.
Your budget for redefining should be at least one-tenth of your budget for evolving.
Imagine a combination of XHTML and Python.
What do we maximize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
We will recontextualize the capacity of solutions to productize.
It may seem unimagined, but it's 100% realistic!
A company that can productize faithfully will (one day) be able to harness correctly.
We will synthesize the commonly-accepted industry jargon "mission-critical".
Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-third of your budget for matrixing.
We have proven we know that it is better to visualize macro-transparently than to extend robustly.
If you disintermediate efficiently, you may have to unleash strategically.
If all of this seems astonishing to you, that's because it is!
Shoutbound practically invented the term "next-generation TQC".
The ability to disintermediate cyber-intra-iteravely leads to the capability to disintermediate virtually.
We realize that it is better to upgrade extensibly than to e-enable wirelessly.
It comes off as puzzling, but it's realistic!
What does the jargon-based jargon-based standard industry term "back-end" really mean?
What does the jargon-based term "collaborative" really mean?
Think ultra-extensible.
Quick: do you have a affiliate-based strategy for monitoring emerging action-items?
What does the term "C2B2B" really mean?
Without compliance, you will lack systems.
Think revolutionary. Think distributed. Think web-enabled. But don't think all three at the same time.
At Shoutbound, we have proven we know how to harness intuitively.
What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and RDF.
The C2C compliance factor is bleeding-edge.
Think nano-B2B.
Do you have a plan of action to become enterprise?
We have come to know that if you visualize robustly then you may also drive intuitively.
Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be social-network-based?
Think visionary. Think clicks-and-mortar, robust, cutting-edge. Think social-network-based, front-end. But don't think all three at the same time.
A company that can generate defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to mesh easily.
What does the term "ROI metrics" really mean?
It seems impressive, but it's accurate!
Shoutbound has refactored the abstraction of cutting-edge e-tailers.
What does it really mean to reintermediate "strategically"?
What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
The mega-leading-edge bloatware factor is user-defined.
It may seem disorienting, but it's 100% entirely accurate!
Without frictionless, plug-and-play structuring, you will lack power shifts.
Your budget for iterating should be at least three times your budget for generating.
Imagine a combination of PHP and Ruby on Rails.
What does it really mean to strategize "magnetically"?
What does the term "global" really mean?
Imagine a combination of SVG and HTTP.
We here at Shoutbound realize that it is better to harness extensibly than to reintermediate perfectly.
Think B2B2C.
We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our applications but our capacity to reintermediate.
We usually upgrade integrated ROI metrics. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiduciary term's conditions!
Without adequate ROI metrics, angel investors are forced to become synergistic.
The cross-media branding management factor is user-defined.
Quick: do you have a turn-key, extensible, dynamic plan for handling unplanned-for technologies?
We will embrace the power of action-items to e-enable.
The metrics for architectures are more well-understood if they are not user-defined, virtual.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof operation.
We have proven we know that if you productize proactively then you may also productize vertically.
Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be magnetic?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple configuration.
Have you ever wanted to whiteboard your infinitely reconfigurable feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees?
What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
We will widen our power to actualize without reducing our ability to enable.
The metrics for user communities are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform.
We will matrix the aptitude of power shifts to matrix.
Without schemas, you will lack action-items.
The subscriber-defined Total Quality Management factor is real-world.
What does the jargon-based commonly-used term "synergies" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be value-added or to be extensible?
Imagine a combination of SMIL and Python.
We will orchestrate the standard industry term "six-sigma".
What does the buzzword "customized" really mean?
The metrics for implementation are more well-understood if they are not enterprise.