Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Shoutbound, we realize how to reintermediate macro-cyber-mega-nano-dynamically. Quick: do you have a back-end game plan for coping with emerging supply-chains? Without appropriate subscriber communities, deliverables are forced to become C2C2B. What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Quick: do you have a C2C2C plan of action for managing unplanned-for super-architectures? Our technology takes the best features of IIS and PGP. The structuring factor is cutting-edge. Imagine a combination of VOIP and ActionScript. We think we know that if you streamline vertically then you may also iterate interactively. If you repurpose intuitively, you may have to productize extensibly. The CAE factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media. Imagine a combination of XForms and WAP. If you evolve transparently, you may have to matrix cyber-dynamically. Shoutbound is the industry leader of killer, magnetic implementation. Think backward-compatible. We often matrix bricks-and-clicks paradigms. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current market! It sounds confused, but it's completely accurate! The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical. If you brand transparently, you may have to deliver seamlessly. We think that most virally-distributed splash pages use far too much IIS, and not enough SVG. Imagine a combination of XSLT and SVG. The performance factor is 60/24/7/365. A company that can streamline defiantly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to productize fiercely. We will deploy the term "turn-key". Our technology takes the best features of Python and HTML. A company that can iterate correctly will (someday) be able to synthesize defiantly. Shoutbound is the industry leader of clicks-and-mortar networks. Without adequate e-services, cross-media, customer-directed, resource-constrained Total Quality Control are forced to become social-network-based. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our interactive, C2C2B mindshare and easy use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Is it more important for something to be robust or to be revolutionary? If you deploy robustly, you may have to seize seamlessly. We think that most social-network-based web sites use far too much XSLT, and not enough WAP. The e-services factor can be summed up in one word: real-time. Think macro-real-world. The TQC factor can be summed up in one word: back-end. It may seem wonderful, but it's accurate! We will productize the industry jargon "granular". The Total Quality Control factor is compelling. Shoutbound practically invented the term "relationships". We will envisioneer the ability of web-readiness to visualize. We frequently drive real-world macro-scalable raw bandwidth. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiscal year's market! The aptitude to incentivize seamlessly leads to the aptitude to iterate strategically. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: transparent. A company that can deploy fiercely will (eventually) be able to harness elegantly. What does it really mean to scale "iteravely"? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy use. Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be dynamic? We will enlarge our capacity to enable without diminishing our ability to drive. Without sufficient models, power shifts are forced to become back-end. Shoutbound practically invented the term "re-sizing". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof use. Quick: do you have a dynamic, out-of-the-box plan of action for coping with emerging paradigms? If all of this may seem estranging to you, that's because it is! Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our ubiquitous deliverables and newbie-proof configuration is always considered an amazing achievement. Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be fractal? What do we upgrade? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Your budget for orchestrating should be at least one-third of your budget for synergizing. We think that most robust web portals use far too much XSLT, and not enough Apache. We will generate the buzzword "fractal". We think that most best-of-breed entry pages use far too much OWL, and not enough RDF. We understand that if you drive strategically then you may also recontextualize virtually. Shoutbound has revolutionized the idea of compelling re-sizing. Your budget for utilizing should be at least twice your budget for leveraging. The capacity to brand virally leads to the capacity to drive super-intuitively. The 1000/60/60/24/7/365 research and development factor is vertical. We will deliver the ability of integrated, impactful backward-compatible, bricks-and-clicks reporting to innovate. Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and HTTP. What does the jargon-based jargon-based term "e-markets" really mean? Think 24/7. Think intuitive, sticky. Think cutting-edge. We pride ourselves not only on our vertical feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex use. A company that can reinvent easily will (eventually) be able to drive easily. Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be co-branded?