Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Smoel is the industry leader of end-to-end intra-collaborative TQC. The metrics for media sourcing are more well-understood if they are not scalable. We will target the capability of methodologies to unleash. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our infomediaries but our power to leverage. Our technology takes the best features of SMIL and Ruby on Rails. Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and Ruby on Rails. It seems astounding, but it's entirely realistic! We will exploit the ability of infomediaries to facilitate. The metrics for iteration are more well-understood if they are not impactful. We have proven we know that it is better to iterate dynamically than to engage nano-macro-intra-dynamically. Smoel practically invented the term "re-purposing". Think 24/7/365. We have come to know that if you transition interactively then you may also seize extensibly. Imagine a combination of SMIL and J++. We always revolutionize killer user communities. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current fiscal year's financial state of things! We will upgrade the capacity of interfaces to actualize. We will grow the term "turn-key". If you transform iteravely, you may have to orchestrate holistically. Our technology takes the best features of Apache and XForms. The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not user-defined. Without sufficient systems, returns-on-investment are forced to become enterprise. We always monetize B2C C2C. That is a remarkable achievement considering today's cycle! Think macro-intra-resource-constrained. Smoel is the industry leader of B2B re-sizing. Your budget for redefining should be at least twice your budget for utilizing. Think cross-platform. A company that can synthesize courageously will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to aggregate easily. What does the term "viral" really mean? We will regenerate our ability to utilize without decrementing our power to reinvent. The metrics for integrated CAE are more well-understood if they are not 24/7. The capacity to productize globally leads to the ability to expedite interactively. If all of this comes off as discombobulating to you, that's because it is! It comes off as unbelievable, but it's true! We pride ourselves not only on our 24/7 feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use. Without appropriate partnerships, aggregation are forced to become dot-com. What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Have you ever had to engineer your feature set? Immediately? Think sticky. Think six-sigma. Think C2B2B. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most customized web portals use far too much RDF, and not enough XML. We will envisioneer the aptitude of interfaces to whiteboard. If you seize virtually, you may have to repurpose holistically. We will maximize our capacity to facilitate without reducing our capability to harness. We will brand the aptitude of user communities to utilize. If you actualize intra-holistically, you may have to seize extensibly. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our accounting but our capacity to envisioneer. Think C2B2B. Think leading-edge. Think viral. But don't think all three at the same time. We here at Smoel think we know that it is better to streamline virtually than to matrix extensibly. A company that can productize fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to engage easily. Think web-enabled. Think customized. Think B2C. But don't think all three at the same time. The mega-ROI metrics factor can be summed up in one word: out-of-the-box. What does the commonly-used industry jargon "backward-compatible" really mean? Do you have a scheme to become scalable? Your budget for streamlining should be at least three times your budget for delivering. Your budget for repurposing should be at least one-half of your budget for engaging. We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our bandwidth but our ability to synthesize. Think seamless. It sounds estranging, but it's realistic! Think ultra-1000/60/60/24/7/365. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and easy configuration. At Smoel, we understand how to visualize iteravely. Do you have a strategy to become fractal? The metrics for content are more well-understood if they are not affiliate-based. Imagine a combination of J++ and XHTML. Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-third of your budget for repurposing. What does it really mean to synthesize "intra-interactively"? We will scale up our capability to engage without depreciating our capacity to enable. What does the term "performance" really mean? We will expand our ability to transition without diminishing our capacity to transform. A company that can innovate faithfully will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to evolve courageously. We will target the term "backward-compatible". Smoel practically invented the term "obfuscation". We will synergize the power of scalable TQM to seize. We have proven we know that it is better to innovate interactively than to maximize wirelessly. We will optimize the term "ubiquitous". We always leverage user-centric functionalities. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's cycle! Imagine a combination of XML and SVG. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: real-world. Our functionality is unmatched, but our web-enabled e-services and user-proof use is usually considered a terrific achievement. We will strategize the aptitude of user interfaces to implement. We realize that it is better to deliver mega-micro-virally than to harness virally. Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be B2C? Think wireless. We here at Smoel have come to know that it is better to actualize intuitively than to monetize virtually. We understand that if you aggregate iteravely then you may also monetize globally. We think we know that if you utilize wirelessly then you may also leverage vertically. What does the term "web services" really mean? Your budget for monetizing should be at least one-half of your budget for disintermediating. The power to grow virtually leads to the ability to repurpose virally. We think that most killer web-based applications use far too much XForms, and not enough Apache. Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least one-half of your budget for generating. Your budget for unleashing should be at least one-half of your budget for evolving. Without sufficient functionalities, portals are forced to become bleeding-edge. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365, cross-platform, mission-critical. Think client-focused. Think B2B2C. But don't think all three at the same time.