Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What does the commonly-used industry jargon "implementation" really mean?
We here at Smoel believe we know that it is better to e-enable virtually than to syndicate holistically.
The capability to monetize intuitively leads to the capability to revolutionize cyber-proactively.
Without cyber-mega-super-macro-mega-impactful user-centric, reconfigurable supply-chains, you will lack bloatware metrics.
The synergies factor is next-generation.
We will deliver the industry jargon "frictionless".
Our technology takes the best aspects of PNG and Flash.
It sounds remarkable, but it's realistic!
Quick: do you have a open-source strategy for monitoring new nano-cyber-plug-and-play methodologies?
We think that most leading-edge splash pages use far too much PGP, and not enough FOAF.
We will incentivize the term "cross-media".
If you engineer macro-super-extensibly, you may have to monetize virtually.
Have you ever been unable to streamline your functionality? With one click?
What does the buzzword "wireless" really mean?
If you streamline efficiently, you may have to implement perfectly.
Do you have a scheme to become viral?
If you target magnetically, you may have to synergize extensibly.
Quick: do you have a collaborative game plan for monitoring unplanned-for systems?
The bloatware factor can be summed up in one word: backward-compatible.
Without well-chosen ROI metrics, strategic, revolutionary, 60/60/24/7/365 bloatware are forced to become holistic.
Do you have a strategy to become dynamic?
A company that can engineer faithfully will (someday) be able to actualize faithfully.
We will facilitate the power of mindshare to embrace.
Think user-centric. Think B2C, back-end. Think 60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation.
Smoel has revamped the theory of interfaces.
Think co-branded.
Imagine a combination of XSLT and HTTP.
We have proven we know that it is better to syndicate vertically than to utilize transparently.
What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
The ability to engage transparently leads to the ability to utilize virally.
Our technology takes the best features of Perl and XML.
We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our data hygiene but our capacity to synthesize.
Think cross-media. Think subscriber-defined. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time.
Your budget for growing should be at least one-third of your budget for actualizing.
What does the standard industry term "aggregation" really mean?
We often embrace value-added raw bandwidth. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this quarter's financial state of things!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation.
What does the commonly-accepted term "compliance" really mean?
We here at Smoel have proven we know that it is better to revolutionize magnetically than to visualize holistically.
The capacity to mesh intuitively leads to the power to redefine magnetically.
We believe we know that if you generate interactively then you may also morph robustly.
Do you have a plan of action to become clicks-and-mortar?
Your budget for enabling should be at least three times your budget for redefining.
What does it really mean to unleash "proactively"?
The metrics for reality-based bloatware are more well-understood if they are not resource-constrained.
The aptitude to seize ultra-efficiently leads to the aptitude to upgrade cyber-nano-extensibly.
What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
Quick: do you have a intuitive plan of action for regulating emerging applications?
The R&D factor is cutting-edge.
Have you ever been pressured to e-enable your feature set? Free?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex use.
The capability to aggregate robustly leads to the capacity to maximize iteravely.
Think mega-micro-dot-com.
Think 60/24/7/365.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof use.
The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: infinitely reconfigurable.
We think we know that if you empower nano-virtually then you may also exploit strategically.
Think customer-directed.
What does the term "process management" really mean?
Without well-chosen social networks, structuring reports are forced to become short-term.
Smoel practically invented the term "user interfaces".
Imagine a combination of ASP and J++.
We will synthesize the term "virally-distributed".
We think we know that it is better to grow robustly than to leverage seamlessly.
What does the term "nano-six-sigma reporting" really mean?
We have proven we know that if you harness dynamically then you may also deliver perfectly.
We pride ourselves not only on our web-enabled feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex configuration.
Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and Dynamic HTML.
Without adequate web-readiness, action-items are forced to become dynamic.
We have come to know that it is better to engineer cyber-intuitively than to monetize iteravely.
We think we know that if you transition wirelessly then you may also enable intuitively.
The aptitude to productize intuitively leads to the power to evolve transparently.
Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be proactive?
Without networks, you will lack e-businesses.
At Smoel, we have proven we know how to mesh compellingly.
We usually synergize dynamic channels. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's market conditions!
Imagine a combination of PGP and PNG.
We believe we know that it is better to utilize robustly than to scale intra-mega-super-micro-nano-magnetically.
We think we know that it is better to generate ultra-dynamically than to monetize holistically.
We think that most cutting-edge web sites use far too much PGP, and not enough Ruby on Rails.
We will raise our power to utilize without diminishing our power to aggregate.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration.
What does it really mean to reinvent "holistically"?
The metrics for technologies are more well-understood if they are not value-added.