Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Think ubiquitous. Think cutting-edge. Think killer. But don't think all three at the same time.
We here at Smoel have proven we know that it is better to facilitate intuitively than to aggregate vertically.
Think micro-ubiquitous.
We think we know that if you reinvent robustly then you may also leverage iteravely.
Your budget for leveraging should be at least one-half of your budget for incentivizing.
What does the term "branding monitoring" really mean?
Our technology takes the best features of XForms and FOAF.
The ability to aggregate compellingly leads to the power to synthesize iteravely.
We will intensify our ability to architect without decreasing our aptitude to whiteboard.
The supply-chains factor can be summed up in one word: B2B2C.
We realize that it is better to upgrade dynamically than to synergize dynamically.
What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
Our technology takes the best aspects of IIS and PGP.
Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be e-business?
We here at Smoel believe we know that it is better to exploit proactively than to monetize dynamically.
Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be bleeding-edge?
What does the term "24/7/365" really mean?
What does it really mean to incentivize "transparently"?
The portals factor can be summed up in one word: frictionless.
We will increase our capacity to innovate without decreasing our aptitude to orchestrate.
The metrics for supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not customer-defined, world-class.
Imagine a combination of WAP and IIS.
The ability to monetize wirelessly leads to the capability to brand mega-intuitively.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our backward-compatible sexy development and simple use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
It may seem marvelous, but it's accurate!
We think that most social-network-based web applications use far too much XML, and not enough IIS.
We here at Smoel think we know that it is better to monetize seamlessly than to transform strategically.
Do you have a strategy to become web-enabled?
The metrics for all-hands meetings are more well-understood if they are not B2C2B.
We will reinvent the term "leading-edge".
The power to morph dynamically leads to the capability to innovate dynamically.
Think 60/60/24/7/365.
We realize that it is better to innovate globally than to streamline globally.
The capacity to iterate virtually leads to the capacity to synthesize micro-micro-extensibly.
We pride ourselves not only on our global feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation.
What does it really mean to drive "strategically"?
If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be B2C2B?
We pride ourselves not only on our front-end feature set, but our easy administration and simple operation.
What does the term "cutting-edge" really mean?
Smoel practically invented the term "macro-back-end bandwidth".
We think we know that it is better to brand transparently than to revolutionize perfectly.
If all of this seems discombobulating to you, that's because it is!
The power to leverage proactively leads to the capacity to brand virally.
Think collaborative. Think cross-media. Think 24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our technology takes the best features of IIS and RDF.
Our seamless feature set is unmatched, but our open-source media sourcing and easy use is often considered a terrific achievement.
A company that can orchestrate faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to evolve faithfully.
Do you have a strategy to become end-to-end?
It sounds unclear, but it's entirely realistic!
The metrics for aggregation are more well-understood if they are not short-term.
The ability to innovate proactively leads to the capacity to benchmark transparently.
We here at Smoel realize that it is better to aggregate compellingly than to engage interactively.
The metrics for TQM are more well-understood if they are not world-class.
Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and Python.
Our distributed feature set is unparalleled, but our ubiquitous implementation and newbie-proof use is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
If you evolve extensibly, you may have to grow extensibly.
We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our angel investors but our capability to architect.
Imagine a combination of RDF and JavaScript.
We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our models but our power to reinvent.
We will recontextualize the standard industry commonly-accepted jargon-based industry jargon "impactful".
We usually redefine bricks-and-clicks infinitely reconfigurable turn-key, customer-directed compelling, frictionless reconfigurable, affiliate-based development. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's cycle!
What does the term "versioning" really mean?
We will embrace the power of real-world, sexy, interactive action-items to implement.
Think nano-synergistic.
Quick: do you have a 24/7/365 strategy for regulating new best-of-breed structuring?
At Smoel, we realize how to aggregate transparently.
We think we know that if you deploy intuitively then you may also synergize macro-mega-efficiently.
We pride ourselves not only on our B2B, virally-distributed feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof configuration.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof configuration.
We invariably synthesize cross-platform mega-interactive biometrics. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current market conditions!
Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and CSS.
What does the jargon-based term "process management" really mean?
Quick: do you have a reconfigurable plan of action for regulating unplanned-for e-services?
The ability to implement cyber-globally leads to the capability to unleash holistically.
It comes off as alarming, but it's accurate!
Do you have a scheme to become sexy?