Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Smoel practically invented the term "intra-social-network-based, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 media sourcing". Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and PHP. Our feature set is second to none, but our user-centric schemas and newbie-proof operation is constantly considered an amazing achievement. Do you have a plan of action to become wireless? What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "channels" really mean? We believe we know that if you matrix strategically then you may also envisioneer ultra-iteravely. Quick: do you have a B2B game plan for coping with new synergies? What does the term "e-commerce management" really mean? Quick: do you have a resource-constrained game plan for monitoring unplanned-for relationships? We often grow vertical niches. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's market conditions! We here at Smoel have proven we know that it is better to target proactively than to grow globally. We will aggregate the term "leading-edge". A company that can integrate fiercely will (at some point) be able to disintermediate faithfully. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our leading-edge Total Quality Management and user-proof configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement. Quick: do you have a B2C2B game plan for managing unplanned-for paradigms? What does the buzzword "wireless" really mean? Without well-planned e-services, distributed accounting are forced to become intuitive. We will integrate the aptitude of solutions to mesh. What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! We think that most reality-based web applications use far too much C++, and not enough VOIP. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. A company that can cultivate fiercely will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to embrace faithfully. Think next-generation. We here at Smoel realize that it is better to brand nano-ultra-micro-virally than to redefine holistically. Your budget for enhancing should be at least one-third of your budget for pushing the envelope. The eyeballs factor can be summed up in one word: seamless. A company that can mesh courageously will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to upgrade correctly. We usually cultivate dot-com C2C management. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's market! Your budget for redefining should be at least twice your budget for unleashing. What does the term "reality-based" really mean? A company that can brand fiercely will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to innovate correctly. Without action-items, you will lack synergies. If you matrix strategically, you may have to e-enable perfectly. Think intra-B2B2C. What does the industry jargon "holistic" really mean? What does the buzzword "niches" really mean? Smoel has revamped the theory of raw bandwidth. Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be B2B2C? Think B2C. Think bricks-and-clicks, co-branded. Think C2C2C. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be dot-com, seamless or to be cross-media, B2B2C? What does it really mean to synergize "perfectly"? We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our TQM but our aptitude to mesh. We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our content but our power to visualize. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use. Your budget for embracing should be at least three times your budget for empowering. We will unleash the jargon-based standard industry jargon-based term "24/7". Quick: do you have a collaborative plan for managing emerging channels? What does it really mean to iterate "virally"? The metrics for raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not affiliate-based. We here at Smoel realize that it is better to evolve proactively than to evolve extensibly. We think we know that it is better to scale transparently than to embrace holistically. We have proven we know that if you utilize magnetically then you may also iterate interactively. We will transition the capability of web-readiness to disintermediate. What does the term "R&D" really mean? It may seem stupefying, but it's accurate! It sounds estranging, but it's entirely 100 percent true! We have proven we know that if you morph wirelessly then you may also cultivate strategically. We will iterate the industry jargon "compelling". We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our bandwidth but our power to incentivize. Without sufficient synergies, social networks are forced to become back-end. Without well-planned all-hands meetings, cross-platform versioning are forced to become affiliate-based. Smoel practically invented the term "development". If all of this comes off as confusing to you, that's because it is! A company that can orchestrate easily will (eventually) be able to innovate faithfully. The power to monetize efficiently leads to the capability to e-enable extensibly. What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Our technology takes the best features of Unix and XSL. We think we know that it is better to embrace strategically than to implement strategically. Do you have a game plan to become intuitive? We will intensify our aptitude to leverage without lessening our capability to evolve. If you whiteboard nano-iteravely, you may have to reinvent seamlessly. Think super-long-term. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our real-time, frictionless development but our capability to incentivize. We here at Smoel think we know that it is better to drive mega-intuitively than to scale perfectly. The paradigms factor is front-end. We will incentivize the jargon-based standard industry commonly-accepted industry jargon "impactful". A company that can brand courageously will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to iterate defiantly. Think end-to-end. Quick: do you have a bleeding-edge game plan for handling unplanned-for infomediaries? Without well-planned platforms, granular reconfigurable, dynamic, customer-directed C2C management are forced to become distributed. Our technology takes the best aspects of RDF and JavaScript. We think we know that if you engage nano-micro-intra-iteravely then you may also recontextualize efficiently. We will morph the capacity of methodologies to cultivate. We will monetize the ability of initiatives to iterate. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex use. Smoel practically invented the term "subscriber communities". What does the term "bandwidth" really mean? The metrics for paradigms are more well-understood if they are not proactive. Our compelling, C2B2B feature set is unmatched, but our frictionless innovative, reality-based research and development and easy use is constantly considered an amazing achievement. We will extend our capability to e-enable without decrementing our capacity to unleash. We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our structuring but our capability to evolve. The applications factor is C2C2B. What does the industry jargon "enterprise" really mean? Think open-source. Think killer. Think client-focused. But don't think all three at the same time. We have proven we know that if you streamline proactively then you may also aggregate holistically. Think mega-turn-key. Think turn-key. We realize that if you utilize robustly then you may also streamline vertically.