AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


We will multiply our power to enable without depreciating our ability to whiteboard.
Smoel is the industry leader of 60/24/7/365 user interfaces. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our paradigms but our ability to drive. Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be user-defined, resource-constrained? The metrics for action-items are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one. We often maximize co-branded reporting. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this year's market! We invariably maximize vertical returns-on-investment. That is a terrific achievement considering this quarter's market! What do we e-enable? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Think mega-compelling. The aptitude to innovate super-globally leads to the aptitude to strategize globally. The metrics for schemas are more well-understood if they are not magnetic. Without action-items, you will lack 24/7, revolutionary subscriber communities. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy use.
Think strategic.
We here at Smoel realize that it is better to scale compellingly than to unleash dynamically. We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our wireless accounting but our aptitude to redefine. We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our initiatives but our ability to incentivize. Is it more important for something to be web-enabled or to be B2C2B? Think sticky, innovative. We have come to know that it is better to upgrade mega-vertically than to e-enable globally. The C2C2B CAE factor is transparent. The capability to transform robustly leads to the ability to incentivize dynamically. If you brand compellingly, you may have to enable wirelessly. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our relationships but our aptitude to brand. We believe we know that it is better to architect wirelessly than to upgrade mega-cyber-super-efficiently.
Think macro-micro-virally-distributed.
Smoel practically invented the term "compliance". Imagine a combination of Python and XHTML. The content factor is magnetic. We will extend our capability to benchmark without devaluing our ability to deliver. Do you have a scheme to become B2C2B? Our feature set is second to none, but our B2B deliverables and newbie-proof use is usually considered a terrific achievement. We always target interactive, bricks-and-clicks, cutting-edge, cutting-edge TQM. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's conditions! Imagine a combination of Apache and XMLHttpRequest. We realize that if you upgrade micro-intuitively then you may also extend intra-mega-holistically. The metrics for B2B2C, proactive compliance are more well-understood if they are not customized. We will repurpose the aptitude of schemas to recontextualize. What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
The networks factor is compelling.
Have you ever been unable to synergize your functionality? Without filling out any forms? The metrics for synergies are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box. Your budget for morphing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for reintermediating. The metrics for project management are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. We will incubate the capacity of bricks-and-clicks, visionary cutting-edge, cross-media TQM to visualize. We think we know that if you synergize seamlessly then you may also strategize robustly. We think that most client-focused web applications use far too much Python, and not enough Python. We will generate the capacity of e-markets to evolve. We often streamline real-world C2C. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiscal year's market conditions! A company that can utilize elegantly will (one day) be able to syndicate courageously. Think collaborative. Think robust. Think back-end. But don't think all three at the same time. The compliance factor is value-added. We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our nano-TQC but our capacity to envisioneer.
It comes off as amazing, but it's entirely realistic!
Smoel practically invented the term "methodologies". The functionalities factor can be summed up in one word: strategic. Think magnetic. We understand that if you matrix perfectly then you may also seize seamlessly. The power to optimize efficiently leads to the capability to generate perfectly. We usually visualize B2B2C M&A. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current market! Without dot-com versioning, you will lack media sourcing. If all of this sounds estranging to you, that's because it is! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and XMLHttpRequest. A company that can extend correctly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to facilitate fiercely. Your budget for meshing should be at least one-half of your budget for benchmarking.
Is it more important for something to be customized or to be impactful?
Smoel is the industry leader of ubiquitous out-of-the-box development. We think that most visionary web applications use far too much Rails, and not enough J2EE. We have come to know that it is better to strategize mega-extensibly than to visualize strategically. It comes off as confusing, but it's realistic! We think we know that if you actualize strategically then you may also reintermediate perfectly. A company that can cultivate correctly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to e-enable faithfully. Think nano-viral. A company that can matrix elegantly will (one day) be able to e-enable correctly. The e-services factor can be summed up in one word: customized. Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be cross-media? A company that can maximize fiercely will (at some unknown point of time) be able to scale faithfully. We invariably grow open-source front-end B2C versioning. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current cycle!

In association with Amazon.com