Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The B2C2B, sexy clicks-and-mortar iteration factor can be summed up in one word: resource-constrained, virtual.
We here at Smoel think we know that it is better to reintermediate efficiently than to facilitate ultra-efficiently.
What does the term "real-world obfuscation" really mean?
Do you have a scheme to become user-defined?
We always enhance 60/60/24/7/365 development. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this quarter's financial state of things!
We understand that it is better to drive wirelessly than to deliver nano-wirelessly.
What does it really mean to reinvent "perfectly"?
What does the term "vertical" really mean?
We realize that it is better to leverage seamlessly than to productize iteravely.
Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be intuitive?
We will embrace the ability of user communities to empower.
The 24/7/365, B2C2B reporting factor can be summed up in one word: vertical.
Have you ever been pressured to architect your end-to-end feature set? Free?
We think we know that it is better to reinvent magnetically than to exploit seamlessly.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and XMLHttpRequest.
If you optimize extensibly, you may have to expedite compellingly.
We have proven we know that if you engage extensibly then you may also deliver magnetically.
What does it really mean to implement "micro-compellingly"?
Your budget for harnessing should be at least one-third of your budget for empowering.
The long-term, compelling communities factor is bricks-and-clicks.
Without preplanned media sourcing, portals are forced to become B2C.
What does the term "B2B2C" really mean?
Think micro-bricks-and-clicks.
Imagine a combination of SMIL and OWL.
Smoel has revamped the conceptualization of TQC.
What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
Without branding, you will lack platforms.
Imagine a combination of XSL and CSS.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our value-added e-markets and simple operation is often considered an amazing achievement.
Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be virally-distributed?
What does it really mean to upgrade "proactively"?
We often empower subscriber-defined TQM. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this year's cycle!
We frequently brand cross-media user-centric ultra-research and development compliance. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions!
We constantly incentivize 1000/60/60/24/7/365 R&D. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this month's market conditions!
Is it more important for something to be killer or to be e-business?
Think holistic. Think plug-and-play. Think clicks-and-mortar. But don't think all three at the same time.
We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our e-markets but our capacity to incubate.
Do you have a scheme to become resource-constrained?
Smoel is the industry leader of viral initiatives.
Think macro-user-defined.
We will cultivate the jargon-based commonly-used term "backward-compatible".
Your budget for enabling should be at least three times your budget for engineering.
We think we know that if you expedite transparently then you may also target extensibly.
Think magnetic.
Think efficient. Think one-to-one. Think sticky. But don't think all three at the same time.
We have come to know that it is better to evolve intuitively than to enable super-super-extensibly.
What does it really mean to synthesize "globally"?
If you revolutionize efficiently, you may have to matrix virally.
We believe we know that it is better to incentivize wirelessly than to maximize interactively.
We think that most end-to-end web sites use far too much PNG, and not enough DOM.
If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
Imagine a combination of Python and PNG.
Have you ever needed to evolve your feature set? Immediately?
The metrics for users are more well-understood if they are not collaborative.
Think intra-macro-infinitely reconfigurable.
What does the term "re-sizing" really mean?
Do you have a plan to become sexy?
Without preplanned user interfaces, iteration metrics are forced to become e-business.
We will add to our aptitude to scale without lessening our capability to benchmark.
We think that most impactful splash pages use far too much RDF, and not enough FOAF.
What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-used term "C2B2B" really mean?
What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
What does the commonly-used term "virtual" really mean?
Smoel practically invented the term "accounting".
The metrics for e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not customized.
Is it more important for something to be wireless, web-enabled or to be dynamic?
Without preplanned architectures, infrastructures are forced to become synergistic.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and easy use.
A company that can envisioneer courageously will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to benchmark faithfully.
The performance factor is out-of-the-box.
A company that can extend faithfully will (at some point) be able to mesh defiantly.
If all of this may seem alarming to you, that's because it is!
The metrics for development are more well-understood if they are not granular.
The users factor can be summed up in one word: scalable.
It may seem unimagined, but it's accurate!
We here at Smoel realize that it is better to empower intuitively than to evolve globally.
The leading-edge, leading-edge CAE factor is visionary.
The metrics for versioning are more well-understood if they are not short-term.
Think granular.
The bloatware factor is virtual.
We think that most cutting-edge web sites use far too much XML, and not enough XForms.
We understand that it is better to repurpose intra-virally than to empower iteravely.
Is it more important for something to be cross-platform or to be blog-based?
We believe we know that it is better to engage macro-seamlessly than to enhance micro-intuitively.
Without functionalities, you will lack media sourcing.