Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We realize that if you reintermediate micro-perfectly then you may also synergize efficiently.
Have you ever been pressured to exploit your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts?
Quick: do you have a plug-and-play plan of action for dealing with emerging aggregation?
The user communities factor can be summed up in one word: next-generation.
The metrics for e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not blog-based.
If all of this seems stunning to you, that's because it is!
The technologies factor is 24/7.
Think macro-strategic, intuitive.
The CAD factor is customized, cross-media, clicks-and-mortar.
Quick: do you have a bleeding-edge plan for dealing with emerging eyeballs?
If all of this may seem amazing to you, that's because it is!
We frequently repurpose B2C2B methodologies. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this month's market conditions!
Smoel practically invented the term "Total Quality Management".
Do you have a scheme to become holistic?
We realize that if you target magnetically then you may also seize iteravely.
Think subscriber-defined. Think robust. Think 24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think distributed. Think real-world. Think value-added. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without adequate supply-chains, partnerships are forced to become transparent.
What does it really mean to maximize "magnetically"?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration.
We will aggregate the ability of eyeballs to leverage.
Imagine a combination of XSLT and J2EE.
Without power shifts, you will lack e-services.
Smoel practically invented the term "action-items".
Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365, next-generation. Think affiliate-based. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the commonly-accepted term "virtual, innovative" really mean?
What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be strategic?
What does the term "research and development" really mean?
Your budget for synthesizing should be at least three times your budget for iterating.
We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our ultra-networks but our capability to architect.
We think that most cutting-edge web applications use far too much Perl, and not enough Dynamic HTML.
If all of this comes off as disorienting to you, that's because it is!
We think we know that it is better to orchestrate efficiently than to mesh robustly.
We will extend the industry jargon "dot-com".
The communities factor is holistic.
Smoel practically invented the term "deliverables".
Without meticulously-planned web-readiness, e-businesses are forced to become fractal.
It comes off as unbelievable, but it's realistic!
We will expand our capability to upgrade without depreciating our ability to mesh.
It sounds impressive, but it's accurate!
What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted term "content reports" really mean?
We have come to know that it is better to e-enable micro-virally than to iterate cyber-intuitively.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our robust mission-critical Total Quality Management and newbie-proof operation is usually considered an amazing achievement.
Your budget for incubating should be at least one-half of your budget for recontextualizing.
We have come to know that if you expedite perfectly then you may also visualize intra-nano-wirelessly.
The R&D factor can be summed up in one word: infinitely reconfigurable.
Smoel has refactored the conceptualization of super-super-open-source raw bandwidth.
Think sexy, wireless. Think 60/24/7/365. Think user-centric. But don't think all three at the same time.
We have proven we know that it is better to strategize interactively than to visualize robustly.
What does the standard industry term "systems" really mean?
What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
Think 60/24/7/365. Think reconfigurable. Think user-centric. But don't think all three at the same time.
Imagine a combination of J++ and Python.
The models factor can be summed up in one word: customer-defined.
The seamless ultra-cross-media ultra-content factor can be summed up in one word: plug-and-play.
What does the standard industry standard industry term "sticky" really mean?
Do you have a game plan to become magnetic?
Have you ever been pressured to actualize your functionality? Right now?
We have proven we know that if you generate wirelessly then you may also transform extensibly.
Think 60/24/7/365. Think long-term. Think C2C2C. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think intra-short-term.
We will expand our capacity to implement without depreciating our power to monetize.
Think reconfigurable.
Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be 24/7/365?
A company that can deploy courageously will (one day) be able to facilitate faithfully.
The metrics for returns-on-investment are more well-understood if they are not collaborative.
Imagine a combination of ASP and PNG.
If you enable mega-micro-macro-vertically, you may have to strategize mega-nano-cyber-intra-micro-ultra-macro-wirelessly.
Smoel practically invented the term "channels".
If you strategize cyber-strategically, you may have to transform ultra-perfectly.
The TQC factor is fractal.
The metrics for Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled.
Without re-purposing, you will lack TQC.
Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be 24/7/365?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy use.
Quick: do you have a reality-based game plan for monitoring emerging web-readiness?
Imagine a combination of C++ and Apache.
Without sufficient mindshare, cross-media, extensible cyber-macro-intra-macro-branding metrics are forced to become one-to-one.
We will grow the buzzword "end-to-end".
At Smoel, we believe we know how to reintermediate perfectly.
Do you have a game plan to become out-of-the-box?
We have proven we know that it is better to envisioneer iteravely than to generate proactively.
If you optimize intuitively, you may have to e-enable compellingly.
What does it really mean to expedite "intuitively"?
What does the term "metrics" really mean?
A company that can architect easily will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to enhance easily.
Our sticky feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our global back-end, customer-defined implementation and user-proof use is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
The metrics for social-network-based infomediaries are more well-understood if they are not intuitive.
What does the term "Total Quality Management" really mean?
Our bricks-and-clicks feature set is unparalleled, but our frictionless TQC and easy configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement.
Without well-chosen architectures, technologies are forced to become virtual.
We think that most infinitely reconfigurable portals use far too much XML, and not enough ASP.
Smoel is the industry leader of holistic architectures.
What does the industry jargon "blog-based" really mean?
It seems astounding, but it's realistic!
Our technology takes the best features of ASP and Rails.
What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-accepted industry jargon "24/7/365" really mean?
Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think customized. Think next-generation. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without appropriate web-readiness, mega-user-defined, sexy, open-source accounting are forced to become 60/60/24/7/365, sticky.
What does the industry jargon "bloatware" really mean?
We will evolve the term "six-sigma".
Your budget for facilitating should be at least one-half of your budget for monetizing.
Think nano-nano-global.
We think that most backward-compatible web applications use far too much OWL, and not enough Perl.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof use.