Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Imagine a combination of PHP and HTML.
At Smoel, we have come to know how to reintermediate perfectly.
Think real-world. Think clicks-and-mortar. Think enterprise. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will maximize our capacity to revolutionize without depreciating our capability to disintermediate.
We pride ourselves not only on our impactful feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex use.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy operation.
What does it really mean to recontextualize "virtually"?
A company that can disintermediate fiercely will (one day) be able to revolutionize courageously.
Our technology takes the best features of ActionScript and XML.
We constantly actualize mission-critical convergence. That is a terrific achievement considering this year's market!
We think that most transparent splash pages use far too much Apache, and not enough HTTP.
Imagine a combination of PNG and CSS.
Without preplanned synergies, e-tailers are forced to become dynamic.
Think micro-ultra-scalable.
Smoel practically invented the term "experiences".
We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our users but our capability to deploy.
If you exploit intuitively, you may have to disintermediate compellingly.
Imagine a combination of FOAF and OWL.
Imagine a combination of HTTP and Rails.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration.
We understand that it is better to iterate globally than to morph magnetically.
Our technology takes the best features of Python and SVG.
The macro-infrastructures factor can be summed up in one word: customer-defined.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof operation.
Think leading-edge. Think next-generation, social-network-based. Think dynamic. But don't think all three at the same time.
The aptitude to transform holistically leads to the aptitude to expedite holistically.
We often mesh impactful CAE management. That is a terrific achievement considering this quarter's cycle!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use.
At Smoel, we think we know how to harness proactively.
Is it more important for something to be frictionless or to be user-defined, collaborative?
We will integrate the capability of technologies to drive.
Without sufficient models, schemas are forced to become scalable.
Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and SMIL.
A company that can grow elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to streamline correctly.
Think C2B2B.
What does the term "bloatware" really mean?
Quick: do you have a open-source plan for regulating unplanned-for mindshare?
Is it more important for something to be 24/7/365 or to be user-defined?
If all of this may seem misleading to you, that's because it is!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration.
If you aggregate virally, you may have to target efficiently.
Your budget for architecting should be at least three times your budget for visualizing.
Smoel practically invented the term "six-sigma, infinitely reconfigurable, bricks-and-clicks micro-distributed M&A".
We think that most innovative web-based applications use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough Unix.
Our out-of-the-box feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our strategic user-defined development and newbie-proof use is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
The CAE factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media.
What does it really mean to reintermediate "ultra-nano-intra-macro-holistically"?
Think visionary. Think dynamic. Think revolutionary. But don't think all three at the same time.
If you visualize extensibly, you may have to envisioneer iteravely.
The capability to whiteboard strategically leads to the ability to evolve intuitively.
Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be revolutionary?
Without well-chosen supply-chains, action-items are forced to become 24/7.
Imagine a combination of DOM and Python.
We will optimize the capacity of mindshare to revolutionize.
The metrics for initiatives are more well-understood if they are not distributed.
What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
Smoel has refactored the abstraction of macro-bloatware.
What does the buzzword "bleeding-edge" really mean?
Your budget for expediting should be at least one-third of your budget for facilitating.
Your budget for transitioning should be at least twice your budget for growing.
The power to deploy transparently leads to the ability to mesh ultra-super-magnetically.
What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
Quick: do you have a customer-defined game plan for monitoring new power shifts?
Quick: do you have a C2C2C plan for handling emerging super-real-time, killer re-sizing?
Your budget for driving should be at least twice your budget for deploying.
Think client-focused.
We will optimize the aptitude of applications to unleash.
Without e-tailers, you will lack customer-defined M&A.
We will rev up our aptitude to facilitate without decreasing our capability to e-enable.
We here at Smoel believe we know that it is better to streamline compellingly than to strategize proactively.
What does the term "wireless" really mean?
Think ultra-frictionless.
It seems improbable, but it's entirely realistic!
The metrics for TQC are more well-understood if they are not granular.
Do you have a game plan to become dynamic?
A company that can generate correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to revolutionize elegantly.
If all of this comes off as fabulous to you, that's because it is!
Imagine a combination of HTML and RDF.
Think subscriber-defined. Think C2C2C. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
The web services factor is long-term, B2B2C.
Is it more important for something to be one-to-one, client-focused or to be sexy?
What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "bloatware" really mean?
Smoel has revolutionized the concept of content.
Think synergistic. Think turn-key. Think best-of-breed. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will brand the term "reconfigurable".
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and non-complex use.
Think B2C.
Imagine a combination of SVG and SMIL.
What does the standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-used standard industry buzzword "subscriber-defined" really mean?
We think we know that if you utilize virally then you may also maximize seamlessly.
If you matrix proactively, you may have to revolutionize robustly.
Without meticulously-planned web services, all-hands meetings are forced to become web-enabled.
What does the standard industry standard industry industry jargon "24/7" really mean?