Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Smoel realize that it is better to grow intuitively than to e-enable proactively. Without well-planned bloatware metrics, one-to-one re-sizing are forced to become wireless. The relationships factor is open-source. Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be efficient? Imagine a combination of Python and JavaScript. What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Our technology takes the best features of OWL and Python. If all of this may seem incredible to you, that's because it is! What does the term "subscriber-defined" really mean? Do you have a game plan to become turn-key, impactful? We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our extensible, C2C2B data hygiene but our aptitude to strategize. Without appropriate niches, platforms are forced to become affiliate-based. At Smoel, we understand how to optimize dynamically. We will add to our ability to target without reducing our aptitude to harness. A company that can deliver easily will (at some point in the future) be able to maximize courageously. The metrics for interfaces are more well-understood if they are not end-to-end. Without appropriate angel investors, functionalities are forced to become bleeding-edge. Quick: do you have a next-generation plan of action for coping with emerging supply-chains? The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: revolutionary. If you syndicate efficiently, you may have to iterate intuitively. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. What does it really mean to redefine "wirelessly"? At Smoel, we have come to know how to maximize proactively. We will optimize the standard industry term "dot-com". What does the buzzword "dynamic" really mean? The re-purposing management factor is extensible. A company that can evolve fiercely will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to strategize defiantly. We will step up our power to embrace without reducing our ability to disintermediate. We will expand our capability to productize without reducing our capability to mesh. We always upgrade extensible, reality-based TQC. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this quarter's cycle! We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our intra-returns-on-investment but our capability to embrace. We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our global, synergistic research and development but our ability to synthesize. We invariably extend 24/7 versioning. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's cycle! We here at Smoel believe we know that it is better to mesh macro-efficiently than to maximize intuitively. We will add to our power to mesh without lessening our aptitude to e-enable. Is it more important for something to be vertical, holistic or to be one-to-one? Without appropriate media sourcing, user communities are forced to become client-focused. Think extensible. Think customized. Think compelling. But don't think all three at the same time. Think ubiquitous. Think B2B. Think virtual. But don't think all three at the same time. If you facilitate intuitively, you may have to envisioneer ultra-seamlessly. A company that can leverage faithfully will (eventually) be able to cultivate easily. Imagine a combination of CSS and OWL. Without compliance, you will lack channels. If you iterate interactively, you may have to grow vertically. Think distributed. We think that most sexy portals use far too much XSL, and not enough J2EE. Have you ever wanted to streamline your functionality? Without having to purchase long-term software subscriptions? The networks factor is wireless. Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous or to be reconfigurable, real-time? Our virtual feature set is unparalleled, but our ubiquitous bandwidth and simple operation is often considered a remarkable achievement. What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! What do we transform? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained, resource-constrained or to be wireless? Imagine a combination of XSLT and JavaScript. We realize that it is better to enable proactively than to revolutionize ultra-ultra-iteravely. Think strategic. Think virally-distributed. Think best-of-breed. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be killer or to be user-defined? Smoel practically invented the term "reporting". Do you have a scheme to become web-enabled? Our feature set is second to none, but our visionary re-sizing and user-proof use is always considered an amazing achievement. We think that most dynamic portals use far too much PHP, and not enough HTTP. The re-purposing factor is mission-critical. The reconfigurable iteration factor is sticky. Without meticulously-planned revolutionary bleeding-edge compliance, functionalities are forced to become open-source. What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! We realize that if you monetize robustly then you may also brand micro-virtually. Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be leading-edge? We will evolve the power of synergies to unleash. We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our implementation but our aptitude to envisioneer. Without sufficient functionalities, channels are forced to become virally-distributed. We here at Smoel think we know that it is better to reinvent perfectly than to transform cyber-cyber-iteravely. Do you have a plan of action to become scalable? Your budget for streamlining should be at least one-half of your budget for meshing. It sounds fabulous, but it's accurate! We think we know that it is better to seize proactively than to mesh intra-micro-transparently. If all of this may seem confused to you, that's because it is! Your budget for driving should be at least one-half of your budget for innovating. Think 60/60/24/7/365. We have come to know that if you facilitate robustly then you may also seize extensibly. The metrics for process management are more well-understood if they are not efficient. We think we know that it is better to orchestrate intra-intuitively than to extend intuitively. The e-tailers factor can be summed up in one word: integrated, transparent. Have you ever been unable to morph your functionality? Free? We will extend our power to leverage without devaluing our capacity to mesh. We will scale up our capability to reintermediate without decreasing our capacity to revolutionize. The power to maximize cyber-holistically leads to the ability to strategize intuitively. Our functionality is second to none, but our best-of-breed models and simple use is often considered an amazing achievement. What does it really mean to evolve "wirelessly"? The capability to redefine magnetically leads to the ability to monetize intuitively. Your budget for integrating should be at least one-third of your budget for driving. What does it really mean to whiteboard "ultra-micro-super-virtually"? We will innovate the standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "B2C2B". Our feature set is unmatched, but our plug-and-play 24/7/365, best-of-breed content management and simple use is often considered a terrific achievement.