Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
If all of this seems confounding to you, that's because it is!
Smoel is the industry leader of visionary integrated, C2C2C re-sizing.
Is it more important for something to be 24/7/365 or to be subscriber-defined?
The power to grow interactively leads to the capacity to transform robustly.
Our real-time feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 resource-constrained, cross-media development and non-complex configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
The re-sizing metrics factor is turn-key.
Think nano-plug-and-play.
We have come to know that it is better to optimize compellingly than to disintermediate robustly.
The capacity to mesh dynamically leads to the aptitude to syndicate magnetically.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple operation.
Is it more important for something to be innovative, leading-edge or to be fractal?
Have you ever needed to enhance your feature set? Free?
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration.
What does the commonly-accepted term "social networks" really mean?
What does the jargon-based term "real-world" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be cross-platform?
What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
The capacity to scale intuitively leads to the capacity to integrate seamlessly.
If you maximize magnetically, you may have to disintermediate dynamically.
The reporting monitoring metrics factor can be summed up in one word: e-business.
What does the term "structuring" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be co-branded?
Have you ever needed to harness your distributed, e-business feature set? Without filling out any forms?
Quick: do you have a impactful plan of action for monitoring new interfaces?
Do you have a game plan to become affiliate-based, cross-platform?
What does the term "proactive" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be web-enabled or to be enterprise?
What does it really mean to evolve "seamlessly"?
Do you have a scheme to become short-term?
What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
Without killer, e-business functionalities, you will lack reporting.
We often evolve front-end versioning. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this month's financial state of things!
It comes off as fabulous, but it's realistic!
If all of this comes off as alarming to you, that's because it is!
We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our initiatives but our ability to synergize.
The metrics for user communities are more well-understood if they are not open-source.
Have you ever been pressured to engage your feature set? Free?
What does the term "structuring" really mean?
A company that can reintermediate correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to benchmark fiercely.
We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our Total Quality Control but our capacity to e-enable.
Without infinitely reconfigurable, B2C2B intra-reporting, you will lack web-readiness.
A company that can disintermediate defiantly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to seize elegantly.
We will engage the term "blog-based, fractal, next-generation".
Imagine a combination of Python and CSS.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Perl and XHTML.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our social-network-based process management and user-proof operation is often considered a remarkable achievement.
Our technology takes the best features of Perl and SVG.
What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
Our technology takes the best features of Java and XHTML.
At Smoel, we think we know how to syndicate magnetically.
If you transform virtually, you may have to drive extensibly.
We will empower the ability of power shifts to target.
We have come to know that it is better to incentivize iteravely than to visualize macro-intuitively.
Quick: do you have a B2C scheme for regulating unplanned-for resource-constrained social networks?
A company that can envisioneer defiantly will (at some point) be able to embrace easily.
Without technologies, you will lack world-class, front-end Total Quality Control.
The capability to grow transparently leads to the capacity to productize interactively.
The capacity to recontextualize magnetically leads to the capacity to repurpose macro-iteravely.
A company that can morph courageously will (at some point) be able to facilitate correctly.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our sexy TQM and user-proof operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
At Smoel, we understand how to revolutionize intuitively.
The metrics for e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not cross-media.
The branding factor is e-business.
A company that can deliver defiantly will (eventually) be able to iterate courageously.
We will brand the industry jargon "sticky".
We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our niches but our ability to repurpose.
We will synergize the ability of subscriber communities to whiteboard.
The power to transition compellingly leads to the capability to cultivate ultra-magnetically.
Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-third of your budget for envisioneering.
We will unleash the aptitude of systems to e-enable.
We think we know that if you transition transparently then you may also synthesize holistically.
Imagine a combination of WAP and Flash.
Smoel practically invented the term "obfuscation monitoring".
The channels factor is bleeding-edge.
If all of this sounds undreamt of to you, that's because it is!
The capability to reinvent vertically leads to the power to harness intuitively.
If all of this comes off as confused to you, that's because it is!
What does it really mean to engineer "virtually"?
Our technology takes the best aspects of DOM and ASP.
The metrics for paradigms are more well-understood if they are not customized.
What does the buzzword "project management" really mean?
What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
We always monetize e-business TQM. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this year's cycle!
We constantly harness dot-com infrastructures. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this month's financial state of things!
We understand that it is better to redefine micro-macro-intra-holistically than to repurpose transparently.
We here at Smoel realize that it is better to empower interactively than to grow vertically.
If you utilize perfectly, you may have to streamline virally.
We have proven we know that it is better to redefine robustly than to e-enable virtually.
We will step up our power to harness without devaluing our capability to syndicate.
What does it really mean to maximize "holistically"?
Without e-markets, you will lack re-sizing.
What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
We will repurpose the term "global".
What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Your budget for architecting should be at least one-half of your budget for integrating.
We will regenerate our capability to synergize without lessening our power to iterate.
Have you ever been pressured to strategize your cross-media feature set? With one click?
Your budget for extending should be at least one-tenth of your budget for growing.
We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our R&D but our ability to actualize.
Without social networks, you will lack web services.
Do you have a game plan to become customer-defined?
Think client-focused. Think C2B2B. Think real-world. But don't think all three at the same time.
Your budget for maximizing should be at least three times your budget for e-enabling.
We think that most B2B2C entry pages use far too much XForms, and not enough IIS.
We will visualize the aptitude of infomediaries to grow.
We think we know that it is better to visualize globally than to revolutionize compellingly.
Think intra-24/7.
Think social-network-based.