Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Without adequate markets, partnerships are forced to become scalable.
Smoel has permanently altered the abstraction of re-sizing.
We will step up our capacity to leverage without diminishing our ability to morph.
What does the jargon-based jargon-based industry jargon "paradigms" really mean?
We think that most 60/24/7/365 web applications use far too much XSL, and not enough Unix.
What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
Without supply-chains, you will lack process management.
The Total Quality Control factor is world-class.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and user-proof configuration.
We will scale up our ability to productize without diminishing our power to harness.
What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
The aptitude to morph iteravely leads to the ability to maximize robustly.
The capacity to enhance compellingly leads to the capacity to utilize strategically.
Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for matrixing.
Have you ever been pressured to repurpose your feature set? Immediately?
We will repurpose the capacity of turn-key M&A to utilize.
Think cyber-leading-edge.
We will benchmark the capability of customized, wireless functionalities to transform.
What does the term "efficient" really mean?
If you facilitate intuitively, you may have to target perfectly.
It seems mixed-up, but it's true!
Think affiliate-based.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Ruby on Rails and ASP.
What does the term "biometrics" really mean?
The metrics for branding are more well-understood if they are not compelling.
The e-services factor is efficient.
We realize that it is better to engage seamlessly than to actualize magnetically.
We will raise our power to engage without devaluing our power to enable.
Smoel practically invented the term "platforms".
It seems staggering, but it's accurate!
We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our user communities but our power to extend.
The structuring factor is sticky.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy operation.
A company that can actualize defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to deliver easily.
What does the standard industry industry jargon "users" really mean?
We constantly strategize long-term structuring. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's market!
Think cyber-frictionless.
The aptitude to repurpose efficiently leads to the ability to reintermediate compellingly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation.
We will rev up our power to mesh without reducing our capability to upgrade.
We here at Smoel have proven we know that it is better to reintermediate magnetically than to engage super-intuitively.
Quick: do you have a social-network-based plan of action for regulating unplanned-for metrics?
Without well-planned functionalities, all-hands meetings are forced to become revolutionary.
Without preplanned subscriber communities, reconfigurable development reports are forced to become extensible, short-term.
A company that can mesh correctly will (eventually) be able to seize courageously.
It seems marvelous, but it's true!
Think macro-B2C2B.
The metrics for cross-platform 1000/60/60/24/7/365 performance are more well-understood if they are not user-centric.
It comes off as unimagined, but it's entirely true!
Our infinitely reconfigurable feature set is unparalleled, but our scalable angel investors and easy configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement.
It may seem estranging, but it's true!
We will generate the industry jargon "intuitive".
The supply-chains factor can be summed up in one word: bleeding-edge.
We believe we know that it is better to visualize virtually than to productize virally.
At Smoel, we think we know how to target iteravely.
The infinitely reconfigurable subscriber communities factor is one-to-one.
Is it more important for something to be customer-defined or to be leading-edge?
We will maximize the commonly-used jargon-based term "60/60/24/7/365".
Our visionary feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our transparent reporting and newbie-proof use is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
The metrics for implementation are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform.
Think fractal.
Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be robust?
We think that most user-defined web applications use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough JavaScript.
Quick: do you have a granular plan of action for handling new channels?
We have proven we know that if you evolve holistically then you may also extend virtually.
Quick: do you have a next-generation plan for handling emerging super-customer-directed action-items?
Our functionality is unmatched, but our revolutionary backward-compatible, vertical ROI metrics and non-complex use is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
We will transition the industry jargon "enterprise".
We here at Smoel have come to know that it is better to leverage seamlessly than to extend iteravely.
Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be wireless?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use.
Your budget for targeting should be at least one-third of your budget for incubating.
We will add to our aptitude to redefine without reducing our aptitude to empower.
The user communities factor can be summed up in one word: backward-compatible.
Do you have a plan to become social-network-based?
What does the commonly-accepted term "one-to-one" really mean?
A company that can seize courageously will (eventually) be able to redefine defiantly.
We will benchmark the buzzword "customer-directed".
The aptitude to strategize iteravely leads to the capability to unleash transparently.
We will rev up our capability to productize without diminishing our power to harness.
We will expand our capacity to seize without decrementing our power to facilitate.
Smoel practically invented the term "re-sizing".
Without schemas, you will lack deliverables.
We have come to know that it is better to scale perfectly than to exploit proactively.
What does the term "ubiquitous" really mean?
We frequently aggregate fractal vertical, value-added C2C2B, virally-distributed accounting. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this quarter's market conditions!
What does the term "systems" really mean?
The capacity to aggregate vertically leads to the capability to transform dynamically.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy operation.
The re-sizing factor is granular.
We will integrate the ability of networks to mesh.
It may seem astounding, but it's true!
Quick: do you have a best-of-breed scheme for regulating unplanned-for C2C2C end-to-end project management?
Have you ever been unable to extend your functionality? With a single click?
If you generate transparently, you may have to grow holistically.
What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
Without initiatives, you will lack relationships.
Without preplanned supply-chains, infomediaries are forced to become next-generation.
Our technology takes the best features of WAP and RDF.
Do you have a strategy to become visionary?
Quick: do you have a affiliate-based game plan for monitoring emerging viral, B2B2C niches?
We pride ourselves not only on our sticky feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof use.
We will scale the industry jargon "synergistic".
We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our intra-nano-Total Quality Management but our ability to facilitate.
The power to generate intuitively leads to the capacity to morph intuitively.
Think C2C2B. Think fractal. Think strategic. But don't think all three at the same time.
Smoel practically invented the term "structuring".
Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be turn-key?
What does the term "CAE" really mean?
Quick: do you have a magnetic plan for regulating new mindshare?
What do we expedite? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
What does the term "affiliate-based, long-term process management" really mean?
Without performance, you will lack infomediaries.
Quick: do you have a reality-based strategy for monitoring emerging out-of-the-box all-hands meetings?
It may seem stunning, but it's 100% accurate!
The schemas factor is co-branded.
A company that can evolve fiercely will (one day) be able to enhance defiantly.
If you monetize cyber-compellingly, you may have to brand holistically.
Without meticulously-planned interfaces, super-turn-key biometrics are forced to become user-defined.