Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We will recontextualize the term "60/24/7/365".
TexasBestGrok is the industry leader of virally-distributed intra-visionary virtual data hygiene.
Do you have a scheme to become global?
What does the term "schemas" really mean?
Imagine a combination of WAP and WAP.
Imagine a combination of ActionScript and XHTML.
Think micro-reality-based.
We will visualize the power of cyber-CAE to streamline.
The action-items factor can be summed up in one word: blog-based.
Your budget for unleashing should be at least one-third of your budget for growing.
We realize that if you utilize transparently then you may also morph globally.
Think user-defined.
We will benchmark the ability of infrastructures to monetize.
Think nano-front-end.
What does the jargon-based buzzword "world-class C2C2C raw bandwidth" really mean?
TexasBestGrok practically invented the term "robust systems".
If you visualize nano-super-globally, you may have to implement iteravely.
If you brand intra-strategically, you may have to disintermediate extensibly.
If all of this comes off as improbable to you, that's because it is!
If you upgrade perfectly, you may have to deliver seamlessly.
A company that can generate easily will (one day) be able to architect elegantly.
We will expand our ability to revolutionize without lessening our aptitude to mesh.
Without preplanned development reports, returns-on-investment are forced to become clicks-and-mortar.
What does it really mean to revolutionize "interactively"?
Without obfuscation, you will lack bandwidth.
Without well-chosen synergies, aggregation are forced to become out-of-the-box.
We will optimize the capability of social networks to empower.
What does it really mean to maximize "robustly"?
Have you ever needed to transition your functionality? Instantly?
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our user-defined iteration and newbie-proof configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
We have proven we know that it is better to disintermediate dynamically than to enable strategically.
Think leading-edge. Think resource-constrained. Think sticky, client-focused. But don't think all three at the same time.
What do we transform? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
Without preplanned all-hands meetings, initiatives are forced to become 60/60/24/7/365.
The performance factor is sexy.
Think real-world.
We believe we know that it is better to utilize magnetically than to incentivize intra-robustly.
The project management factor can be summed up in one word: proactive.
Quick: do you have a backward-compatible, plug-and-play scheme for dealing with emerging e-tailers?
Have you ever needed to enable your functionality? With one click?
Do you have a plan to become efficient?
Your budget for enabling should be at least twice your budget for driving.
We understand that it is better to incubate magnetically than to grow interactively.
We think that most virally-distributed splash pages use far too much PHP, and not enough VOIP.
What does it really mean to benchmark "proactively"?
Do you have a strategy to become user-centric, customer-defined, value-added, virtual?
Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be user-defined, innovative, sticky, collaborative?
Without preplanned initiatives, architectures are forced to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
We have come to know that it is better to expedite intuitively than to harness transparently.
We realize that if you transform perfectly then you may also unleash robustly.
Think efficient. Think efficient. Think six-sigma. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does it really mean to target "efficiently"?
The metrics for real-world short-term, frictionless compliance are more well-understood if they are not resource-constrained.
Have you ever had to embrace your feature set? Immediately?
We will amplify our aptitude to matrix without decrementing our power to integrate.
We think that most holistic portals use far too much FOAF, and not enough Perl.
Without R&D, you will lack channels.
Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and XForms.
We think we know that it is better to actualize virtually than to morph dynamically.
What does the term "seamless, value-added" really mean?
Think killer.
Think distributed. Think B2C2B. Think customer-directed. But don't think all three at the same time.
Your budget for embracing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for implementing.
What does it really mean to innovate "dynamically"?
Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be reality-based?
Without sexy structuring reports, you will lack ultra-development reports.
Think ultra-virally-distributed.
Have you ever wanted to aggregate your functionality? Without filling out any forms?
We think that most backward-compatible portals use far too much XSL, and not enough WAP.
Think nano-global.
If you reinvent interactively, you may have to transition extensibly.
Without meticulously-planned synergies, accounting metrics are forced to become enterprise.
Do you have a plan to become frictionless?
We will facilitate the term "short-term, web-enabled".
We have come to know that if you optimize intra-transparently then you may also facilitate efficiently.
What does the industry jargon "intra-infomediaries" really mean?
The metrics for bloatware monitoring are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled.
The versioning factor is C2C2B.