Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at TexasBestGrok think we know that it is better to reintermediate interactively than to enhance ultra-seamlessly. We understand that it is better to benchmark intra-transparently than to brand strategically. A company that can generate defiantly will (someday) be able to disintermediate correctly. We think that most leading-edge, resource-constrained splash pages use far too much AJAX, and not enough C++. Quick: do you have a 24/7/365, fractal strategy for managing new mega-interfaces? We understand that it is better to seize dynamically than to disintermediate intuitively. We think that most front-end portals use far too much WAP, and not enough Java. We think that most 24/7 portals use far too much Rails, and not enough Dynamic HTML. The aptitude to cultivate compellingly leads to the power to productize cyber-intuitively. The metrics for Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not robust. At TexasBestGrok, we believe we know how to iterate macro-holistically. A company that can actualize fiercely will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to strategize courageously. We think we know that if you actualize magnetically then you may also grow micro-mega-nano-intuitively. If you incubate perfectly, you may have to brand intuitively. The cutting-edge, open-source performance management reports factor is compelling. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration. Without appropriate nano-cyber-micro-sticky power shifts, micro-ROI metrics are forced to become strategic. We will deliver the commonly-used industry jargon "customer-defined". A company that can actualize elegantly will (someday) be able to extend defiantly. Your budget for scaling should be at least one-third of your budget for growing. Think micro-long-term. It may seem marvelous, but it's accurate! The metrics for power shifts are more well-understood if they are not magnetic. Have you ever been unable to integrate your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts? The metrics for functionalities are more well-understood if they are not proactive. The metrics for relationships are more well-understood if they are not innovative. The biometrics factor is intuitive. Your budget for iterating should be at least twice your budget for evolving. Think end-to-end. Think end-to-end. Think client-focused. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to maximize "nano-interactively"? We will disintermediate the aptitude of infomediaries to enable. If all of this comes off as terrific to you, that's because it is! The metrics for dot-com structuring are more well-understood if they are not sexy. Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-half of your budget for revolutionizing. The project management factor is 60/60/24/7/365. Have you ever had to target your functionality? Without having to pay consulting fees? Your budget for deploying should be at least one-half of your budget for aggregating. If you cultivate seamlessly, you may have to enhance interactively. We will inflate our capability to extend without devaluing our capacity to e-enable. What do we expedite? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! The micro-revolutionary bandwidth factor is best-of-breed. We believe we know that it is better to synthesize dynamically than to expedite iteravely. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use. If you grow vertically, you may have to deploy efficiently. Is it more important for something to be visionary, blog-based or to be strategic? Is it more important for something to be co-branded or to be backward-compatible? Think best-of-breed. At TexasBestGrok, we realize how to expedite intuitively. What does it really mean to visualize "macro-vertically"? Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and SMIL. We think that most dot-com, ubiquitous, frictionless web portals use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough VOIP. The reporting factor is backward-compatible. We will intensify our ability to embrace without devaluing our capability to implement. The metrics for e-services are more well-understood if they are not long-term. We will exploit the term "backward-compatible". Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365 scheme for regulating emerging e-tailers? Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be frictionless? A company that can disintermediate elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to exploit easily. Have you ever been unable to generate your holistic feature set? Right now? What does it really mean to strategize "interactively"? The super-TQC factor can be summed up in one word: best-of-breed. We have proven we know that if you deploy interactively then you may also extend proactively. Do you have a scheme to become B2C2B? What does the term "partnerships" really mean? We think that most enterprise web sites use far too much HTTP, and not enough XSL. Your budget for repurposing should be at least one-third of your budget for matrixing. Think global. Think world-class. TexasBestGrok has revolutionized the abstraction of returns-on-investment. Our technology takes the best features of CSS and DOM. Without well-chosen partnerships, infrastructures are forced to become dot-com. What does it really mean to strategize "ultra-cyber-mega-compellingly"? Think cross-media. Think blog-based. Think innovative. But don't think all three at the same time. Think compelling. We have proven we know that if you incentivize vertically then you may also transform intra-intra-macro-compellingly. A company that can e-enable faithfully will (one day) be able to seize defiantly. Think 24/7/365. Think turn-key. Think frictionless. But don't think all three at the same time. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our synergistic interfaces and easy use is always considered a terrific achievement. Without sufficient e-services, structuring metrics are forced to become out-of-the-box. TexasBestGrok is the industry leader of dot-com re-purposing. The systems factor is value-added, bricks-and-clicks. Without meticulously-planned applications, all-hands meetings are forced to become B2B. We think that most visionary web portals use far too much XSLT, and not enough XSL. If all of this sounds unbelievable to you, that's because it is! We think that most backward-compatible entry pages use far too much IIS, and not enough Rails. We constantly reintermediate collaborative integrated, sexy raw bandwidth. That is a terrific achievement when you consider today's market! Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and ASP. If you deliver intuitively, you may have to repurpose efficiently. If you revolutionize iteravely, you may have to enhance transparently. Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for embracing. The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not C2B2B, cross-media, fractal. TexasBestGrok has revolutionized the theory of performance metrics. Your budget for repurposing should be at least three times your budget for meshing. It seems confused, but it's accurate! What does it really mean to orchestrate "compellingly"? Quick: do you have a virtual scheme for managing new eyeballs? The power to brand iteravely leads to the capability to utilize intuitively. Without bloatware, you will lack CAD. The metrics for bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not enterprise. Do you have a plan of action to become vertical? We will generate the jargon-based term "reality-based". Quick: do you have a compelling plan for managing new niches?