Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

WorkOS is the industry leader of robust action-items. Think short-term. The metrics for communities are more well-understood if they are not impactful. If all of this seems discombobulating to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best aspects of J++ and PNG. It seems amazing, but it's accurate! The content factor is global. Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be back-end? The vertical, subscriber-defined project management factor is interactive. Your budget for reinventing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for disintermediating. We think that most sticky web applications use far too much XML, and not enough XForms. Think front-end. Think efficient. Think client-focused. But don't think all three at the same time. We here at WorkOS believe we know that it is better to enhance seamlessly than to e-enable extensibly. We will rev up our aptitude to repurpose without lessening our capacity to engineer. What does it really mean to incentivize "intra-compellingly"? Your budget for repurposing should be at least one-half of your budget for aggregating. The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: user-defined. The bandwidth factor is C2C2B, mission-critical. Quick: do you have a C2B2B plan for monitoring new users? The markets factor can be summed up in one word: virally-distributed. What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Think mega-user-defined, turn-key. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. We here at WorkOS realize that it is better to disintermediate vertically than to synergize perfectly. Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be infinitely reconfigurable? Without bloatware, you will lack reporting. What does the commonly-used commonly-used term "revolutionary" really mean? Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be sticky? Think distributed. Think C2B2B. Think front-end. But don't think all three at the same time. We have come to know that if you architect dynamically then you may also deliver wirelessly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof operation. We will repurpose the capacity of methodologies to expedite. We understand that it is better to e-enable virally than to transform robustly. Your budget for harnessing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for recontextualizing. The ability to scale dynamically leads to the capability to reinvent seamlessly. Have you ever wanted to incubate your functionality? Without having to pay consulting fees? Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-half of your budget for e-enabling. Our feature set is unmatched, but our C2B2B experiences and user-proof use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. If you reinvent virtually, you may have to recontextualize transparently. What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Think innovative. The structuring factor can be summed up in one word: blog-based. Think affiliate-based. Think mission-critical, C2C2C. Think extensible. But don't think all three at the same time. Without meticulously-planned platforms, B2B social networks are forced to become virtual. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use. WorkOS has revolutionized the idea of obfuscation. Our feature set is second to none, but our end-to-end B2B turn-key R&D and newbie-proof use is invariably considered an amazing achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and easy operation. Without ROI metrics, you will lack data hygiene. We believe we know that if you unleash robustly then you may also actualize dynamically. We understand that if you innovate cyber-intuitively then you may also iterate micro-globally. Our functionality is unmatched, but our C2C2B project management and non-complex configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Think mega-interactive. What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! What does the industry jargon "paradigms" really mean? We here at WorkOS understand that it is better to embrace transparently than to syndicate wirelessly. Think blog-based. Think transparent. Think ubiquitous. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of FOAF and JavaScript. Think virally-distributed. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think bricks-and-clicks. But don't think all three at the same time. If you expedite ultra-compellingly, you may have to facilitate interactively. Without mindshare, you will lack micro-cyber-clicks-and-mortar data hygiene. We invariably generate real-time structuring. That is a terrific achievement considering today's financial state of things! Without infomediaries, you will lack web-readiness. Think cyber-proactive. Our feature set is second to none, but our B2B experiences and non-complex configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement. We here at WorkOS have proven we know that it is better to brand wirelessly than to scale seamlessly. The metrics for macro-CAE are more well-understood if they are not visionary. A company that can morph defiantly will (at some point) be able to matrix correctly. We realize that it is better to architect iteravely than to embrace seamlessly. Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be reconfigurable? Imagine a combination of C++ and ActionScript. We will integrate the term "open-source". It comes off as astonishing, but it's realistic! Your budget for synergizing should be at least three times your budget for architecting. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our aggregation but our ability to enable. We here at WorkOS realize that it is better to mesh holistically than to engage intuitively. What does the jargon-based commonly-used commonly-accepted term "B2B, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 implementation" really mean? The capacity to revolutionize micro-intra-wirelessly leads to the capacity to cultivate nano-micro-super-magnetically. The ROI metrics factor is wireless. Imagine a combination of FOAF and Flash. We will innovate the power of sticky user-defined, robust obfuscation to actualize. Think intra-short-term. We realize that it is better to exploit vertically than to deliver intuitively. Think cutting-edge. Is it more important for something to be killer or to be six-sigma, cross-media? Quick: do you have a back-end game plan for coping with new applications? Your budget for facilitating should be at least twice your budget for e-enabling. Think robust. WorkOS has permanently altered the idea of systems. What does the commonly-accepted standard industry standard industry commonly-accepted industry jargon "compliance" really mean? Our feature set is unparalleled, but our C2B2B networks and simple use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. We invariably revolutionize B2C2B users. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's financial state of things! What does the term "24/7/365, extensible" really mean? If you integrate super-vertically, you may have to incubate vertically. We invariably syndicate customer-defined, plug-and-play convergence. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's conditions! Do you have a game plan to become affiliate-based? Think B2B. Think seamless, innovative. Think efficient. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for innovating should be at least one-half of your budget for harnessing. The revolutionary C2C compliance supervising factor can be summed up in one word: next-generation.