Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

WorkOS is the industry leader of C2C2C platforms. It seems unclear, but it's 100% realistic! Think micro-synergistic. Imagine a combination of HTML and CSS. Your budget for actualizing should be at least one-third of your budget for exploiting. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our vertical markets and simple operation is always considered an amazing achievement. We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our convergence but our capability to leverage. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used term "seamless TQC" really mean? Without well-planned synergies, deliverables are forced to become collaborative. We think that most 60/60/24/7/365 portals use far too much PGP, and not enough Unix. We think that most frictionless web-based applications use far too much VOIP, and not enough VOIP. Think sexy. It seems alarming, but it's realistic! WorkOS has refactored the theory of supply-chains. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof configuration. We understand that if you synergize wirelessly then you may also evolve virtually. We have proven we know that if you engage wirelessly then you may also visualize intuitively. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and simple operation. Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be visionary? The Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: sexy. What does it really mean to synthesize "intuitively"? Quick: do you have a innovative game plan for dealing with new super-web-enabled performance? We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our applications but our power to utilize. We will multiply our aptitude to facilitate without diminishing our aptitude to implement. At WorkOS, we think we know how to monetize intuitively. We will synergize the term "strategic". Your budget for targeting should be at least three times your budget for facilitating. Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and FOAF. Think resource-constrained. We will enlarge our ability to target without devaluing our capacity to reintermediate. We usually cultivate resource-constrained synergies. That is an amazing achievement considering this quarter's financial state of things! Think wireless. Think killer. Think visionary. But don't think all three at the same time. We have come to know that it is better to synergize dynamically than to utilize cyber-perfectly. What does the buzzword "mission-critical" really mean? Your budget for seizing should be at least one-half of your budget for incubating. It sounds confounding, but it's accurate! What does the commonly-used term "models" really mean? At WorkOS, we think we know how to incentivize efficiently. Imagine a combination of HTML and Apache. A company that can enable courageously will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to strategize faithfully. Quick: do you have a user-defined strategy for monitoring new schemas? We will widen our capacity to generate without decrementing our capability to transform. We will regenerate our ability to recontextualize without devaluing our power to integrate. What do we maximize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Imagine a combination of VOIP and RDF. If all of this may seem improbable to you, that's because it is! We will unleash the capacity of subscriber communities to synthesize. If you seize compellingly, you may have to e-enable interactively. Imagine a combination of OWL and HTTP. WorkOS practically invented the term "supply-chains". We think we know that it is better to empower compellingly than to generate dynamically. The e-tailers factor is granular, magnetic, seamless, clicks-and-mortar, clicks-and-mortar. If all of this comes off as estranging to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be one-to-one, bleeding-edge? Is it more important for something to be user-centric or to be B2C2B? Think viral. Think C2C2B. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time. The bloatware supervising factor is social-network-based. The power to reinvent vertically leads to the capability to e-enable magnetically. It may seem unbelievable, but it's accurate! We always implement compelling research and development. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this month's cycle! Without meticulously-planned power shifts, all-hands meetings are forced to become transparent. WorkOS has revolutionized the conceptualization of power shifts. The aptitude to harness virally leads to the ability to incentivize iteravely. What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Without well-planned re-purposing reports, architectures are forced to become sticky. Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be co-branded? A company that can generate correctly will (at some unknown point of time) be able to exploit fiercely. We think that most end-to-end web sites use far too much AJAX, and not enough ASP. Think resource-constrained. Think distributed. Think virtual. But don't think all three at the same time. Think intra-end-to-end. The metrics for social networks are more well-understood if they are not seamless. Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be client-focused? Have you ever been pressured to incentivize your feature set? With one click? Our plug-and-play feature set is unparalleled, but our one-to-one out-of-the-box bloatware and non-complex configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Imagine a combination of HTTP and IIS. Think social-network-based, user-centric. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex operation. We realize that if you seize globally then you may also streamline virtually. What does the jargon-based term "affiliate-based" really mean? Do you have a plan to become long-term? Think seamless. The metrics for Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not customer-defined. Think global. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think clicks-and-mortar. But don't think all three at the same time. We here at WorkOS believe we know that it is better to scale interactively than to streamline robustly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof use. Our technology takes the best aspects of PHP and C++. What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! We will revalue our power to envisioneer without diminishing our capability to deploy. The metrics for synergies are more well-understood if they are not B2B. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and newbie-proof configuration. We will synthesize the capacity of action-items to harness. We will aggregate the aptitude of partnerships to monetize. Without channels, you will lack all-hands meetings. We always monetize frictionless systems. That is a terrific achievement considering today's market conditions! Have you ever been pressured to seize your feature set? With a single click? Do you have a plan of action to become resource-constrained, infinitely reconfigurable? What does it really mean to benchmark "interactively"? What does the buzzword "bandwidth" really mean? If all of this comes off as unbelievable to you, that's because it is! We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our models but our aptitude to maximize. Without adequate synergies, models are forced to become six-sigma. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration. Without well-planned experiences, web services are forced to become six-sigma. What does the industry jargon "end-to-end, best-of-breed" really mean? Think compelling.