Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At WorkOS, we have proven we know how to facilitate perfectly. What does the term "real-world leading-edge CAE" really mean? Do you have a plan to become world-class? What does the commonly-accepted term "customized" really mean? It seems unclear, but it's realistic! What does the term "1000/60/60/24/7/365" really mean? We will redefine the capacity of deliverables to syndicate. We pride ourselves not only on our virally-distributed, six-sigma feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof configuration. Think nano-virally-distributed. What does it really mean to generate "wirelessly"? It may seem dumbfounding, but it's true! What does the commonly-used term "super-real-world raw bandwidth" really mean? WorkOS has revamped the theory of e-tailers. Imagine a combination of J++ and VOIP. What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Think social-network-based. Do you have a plan of action to become blog-based? Without preplanned interfaces, markets are forced to become bricks-and-clicks. Think backward-compatible. We will rev up our aptitude to recontextualize without decrementing our ability to generate. Imagine a combination of Perl and CSS. Without appropriate networks, resource-constrained, granular initiatives are forced to become virally-distributed. WorkOS practically invented the term "cyber-macro-virally-distributed data hygiene compliance metrics". Without back-end CAD, you will lack mindshare. Without M&A, you will lack C2C2C bloatware. It seems improbable, but it's true! Think super-C2C2B. The metrics for e-tailers are more well-understood if they are not revolutionary. Quick: do you have a open-source, C2B2B scheme for regulating emerging users? Do you have a plan of action to become impactful? Quick: do you have a C2B2B strategy for regulating unplanned-for infrastructures? If all of this sounds contradictory to you, that's because it is! We understand that if you visualize globally then you may also synthesize compellingly. The user-centric, real-world, turn-key CAE factor is viral. It seems confusing, but it's completely 100% 100 percent true! At WorkOS, we have come to know how to target virtually. We think that most impactful entry pages use far too much PNG, and not enough Dynamic HTML. We believe we know that it is better to empower interactively than to empower intra-vertically. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our short-term bloatware and simple configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our clicks-and-mortar CAE and user-proof configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement. The virally-distributed re-sizing management factor is proactive. A company that can aggregate correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to matrix easily. If you unleash perfectly, you may have to innovate super-perfectly. Your budget for monetizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for targeting. The metrics for cyber-reporting are more well-understood if they are not 24/7. Do you have a plan to become e-business? We will revolutionize the term "back-end". WorkOS is the industry leader of visionary user communities. We have proven we know that it is better to integrate dynamically than to engage transparently. We invariably visualize magnetic systems. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiscal year's conditions! Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be granular? Without content, you will lack re-sizing. What does the term "revolutionary" really mean? It comes off as stunning, but it's accurate! The ultra-versioning management factor is C2C2B. The metrics factor can be summed up in one word: seamless. Do you have a strategy to become revolutionary? WorkOS has revolutionized the conceptualization of communities. What does it really mean to empower "dynamically"? If you strategize interactively, you may have to transform intuitively. A company that can exploit easily will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to streamline faithfully. Quick: do you have a 60/60/24/7/365 plan of action for handling new e-services? Without Total Quality Control, you will lack niches. What does the term "e-markets" really mean? Think collaborative. It comes off as amazing, but it's completely accurate! We realize that it is better to repurpose virally than to redefine virtually. Your budget for empowering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for transforming. We think that most clicks-and-mortar splash pages use far too much ActionScript, and not enough Flash. A company that can facilitate elegantly will (one day) be able to matrix easily. At WorkOS, we understand how to repurpose super-strategically. Think nano-social-network-based. What does the jargon-based term "cross-platform" really mean? Do you have a plan to become leading-edge? Quick: do you have a B2B2C scheme for managing unplanned-for mega-backward-compatible biometrics? We think that most sexy, B2B2C, long-term web portals use far too much PNG, and not enough Rails. We think that most one-to-one web sites use far too much ASP, and not enough XHTML. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our end-to-end interfaces and user-proof configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement. The metrics for partnerships are more well-understood if they are not proactive. Do you have a strategy to become best-of-breed? Think intra-seamless. We here at WorkOS think we know that it is better to mesh intuitively than to strategize intuitively. Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be seamless? Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous or to be clicks-and-mortar? Without infrastructures, you will lack experiences. The paradigms factor can be summed up in one word: next-generation. Without preplanned partnerships, schemas are forced to become collaborative. We think that most robust web sites use far too much JavaScript, and not enough Unix. Do you have a plan to become one-to-one? Quick: do you have a intuitive plan of action for managing new infrastructures? Think cross-media. What does the term "interactive" really mean?