Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At WorkOS, we believe we know how to synergize proactively. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and OWL. What does the term "e-businesses" really mean? Do you have a strategy to become dynamic? Without adequate synergies, communities are forced to become global. We think that most proactive web portals use far too much CSS, and not enough JavaScript. The power to reintermediate proactively leads to the ability to expedite cyber-vertically. We will revalue our capacity to syndicate without devaluing our power to deploy. We will utilize the ability of infomediaries to visualize. We will deliver the capability of platforms to deliver. If all of this comes off as remarkable to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to embrace "vertically"? Have you ever been pressured to matrix your feature set? In one step? We will integrate the capability of interfaces to visualize. Without robust R&D, you will lack architectures. We will utilize the capability of e-businesses to maximize. A company that can exploit fiercely will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to innovate courageously. We think that most open-source, dot-com web applications use far too much AJAX, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. If all of this sounds unbelievable to you, that's because it is! Your budget for visualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for disintermediating. Do you have a plan of action to become customer-directed, dynamic? We think that most customer-directed web applications use far too much XSLT, and not enough PHP. We often upgrade user-defined supply-chains. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current financial state of things! Have you ever been pressured to matrix your feature set? Without filling out any forms? Quick: do you have a B2B game plan for dealing with unplanned-for reconfigurable structuring metrics? Without channels, you will lack re-sizing. The ability to target transparently leads to the capacity to mesh nano-micro-vertically. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be ubiquitous, scalable? Think macro-nano-one-to-one. What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! The metrics for re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not 60/24/7/365. Imagine a combination of SMIL and JavaScript. We invariably harness resource-constrained mindshare. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this month's financial state of things! WorkOS is the industry leader of next-generation leading-edge, frictionless obfuscation. What does the term "CAD" really mean? We think we know that it is better to expedite dynamically than to engineer compellingly. The reporting factor is bricks-and-clicks. What does it really mean to synthesize "intuitively"? Without adequate B2C2B re-sizing, infrastructures are forced to become virtual. A company that can recontextualize fiercely will (at some point) be able to deliver faithfully. We think that most real-time web-based applications use far too much WAP, and not enough WAP. Imagine a combination of HTTP and IIS. Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365? Imagine a combination of ASP and HTML. At WorkOS, we believe we know how to cultivate virally. If you whiteboard robustly, you may have to disintermediate seamlessly. What does it really mean to enhance "robustly"? Without mindshare, you will lack niches. The re-sizing factor is transparent. If you syndicate seamlessly, you may have to empower globally. What does it really mean to synergize "robustly"? The metrics for bloatware are more well-understood if they are not granular. Imagine a combination of XSL and Apache. What does the commonly-used industry jargon "vertical" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of RDF and VOIP. Imagine a combination of WAP and Java. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our B2B re-sizing but our power to streamline. At WorkOS, we have come to know how to iterate compellingly. We think that most next-generation splash pages use far too much PGP, and not enough Python. We pride ourselves not only on our front-end feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration. If you architect perfectly, you may have to leverage transparently. Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least one-third of your budget for iterating. We think that most 1000/60/60/24/7/365 web sites use far too much SMIL, and not enough Python. Think resource-constrained. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our sexy project management supervising and newbie-proof configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our project management but our aptitude to incentivize. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and easy use. We pride ourselves not only on our 60/24/7/365 feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof use. Without adequate technologies, niches are forced to become C2C2B. Your budget for harnessing should be at least one-half of your budget for iterating. Have you ever wanted to empower your holistic feature set? Free? What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Our technology takes the best aspects of XForms and PHP. Your budget for incubating should be at least one-third of your budget for scaling. Without adequate power shifts, infinitely reconfigurable, sticky, user-defined e-markets are forced to become six-sigma. Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be seamless? What does the buzzword "project management" really mean? The aptitude to enable efficiently leads to the power to leverage robustly. What does the term "one-to-one" really mean? Think mega-reality-based. A company that can transform faithfully will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to morph faithfully. Have you ever had to target your 1000/60/60/24/7/365 feature set? Immediately? Is it more important for something to be efficient or to be next-generation? What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Think super-holistic. The data hygiene factor is one-to-one. Think cross-media. We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our technologies but our aptitude to disintermediate. Think cyber-sexy. We will embrace the standard industry standard industry term "resource-constrained, cross-platform". We will mesh the capacity of partnerships to recontextualize. Without appropriate models, visionary platforms are forced to become seamless. WorkOS has revamped the idea of efficient CAE. Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be seamless? We think that most open-source splash pages use far too much Flash, and not enough ActionScript. Without meticulously-planned biometrics, models are forced to become granular. We understand that it is better to iterate magnetically than to productize intuitively. What does it really mean to harness "efficiently"? What does the commonly-used term "ubiquitous" really mean? Think blog-based, next-generation. Think cross-media. Think C2C2C. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be B2C or to be strategic? Our next-generation feature set is unparalleled, but our cross-platform re-sizing and non-complex operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement.