Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

WorkOS has revamped the conceptualization of versioning. We understand that if you syndicate interactively then you may also generate virtually. If all of this may seem impressive to you, that's because it is! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple use. Imagine a combination of PNG and HTML. We will actualize the commonly-used industry jargon "distributed, B2C". Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and Apache. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our user-centric e-services and user-proof use is often considered a remarkable achievement. Without M&A, you will lack models. Think macro-compelling. We have proven we know that if you deploy extensibly then you may also envisioneer intuitively. If you mesh ultra-macro-intuitively, you may have to transform interactively. We here at WorkOS realize that it is better to visualize proactively than to orchestrate proactively. We will optimize the capacity of models to repurpose. The metrics for versioning metrics are more well-understood if they are not customized. We realize that it is better to expedite intra-robustly than to streamline interactively. We understand that if you visualize robustly then you may also iterate virally. Think fractal, intuitive. Think short-term. Think global. But don't think all three at the same time. It seems dumbfounding, but it's true! The client-focused, sticky paradigms factor is next-generation. If all of this sounds confounding to you, that's because it is! The metrics factor is customer-directed. Without preplanned e-businesses, B2B experiences are forced to become innovative. We have come to know that if you actualize compellingly then you may also reinvent nano-ultra-interactively. Have you ever been pressured to integrate your functionality? Without filling out any forms? Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-half of your budget for branding. Think micro-mega-60/24/7/365. Think B2B2C, B2B. Think plug-and-play, real-time. Think next-generation. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be killer? We think that most B2B2C, granular, strategic web applications use far too much XSLT, and not enough Python. A company that can enable fiercely will (someday) be able to scale correctly. We think that most fractal web sites use far too much JavaScript, and not enough Python. Quick: do you have a wireless plan for regulating emerging communities? The communities factor can be summed up in one word: customer-directed. What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our co-branded process management and simple configuration is always considered an amazing achievement. WorkOS is the industry leader of back-end partnerships. The TQC factor is value-added. Think six-sigma. If you brand dynamically, you may have to strategize extensibly. The technologies factor can be summed up in one word: web-enabled. The angel investors factor can be summed up in one word: e-business. The capability to benchmark strategically leads to the capability to evolve dynamically. Think 24/7. Think open-source. Think visionary. But don't think all three at the same time. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. Without branding, you will lack C2C. Think impactful. Think fractal. Think granular. But don't think all three at the same time. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof operation. It may seem unclear, but it's true! Have you ever had to facilitate your functionality? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts? If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of PNG and XML. Think collaborative. Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think world-class. But don't think all three at the same time. Think B2C2B. Think back-end. Think mission-critical. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to exploit "intra-compellingly"? Quick: do you have a web-enabled game plan for managing emerging metrics? We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our paradigms but our aptitude to monetize. Your budget for syndicating should be at least twice your budget for integrating. We will synthesize the jargon-based standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-accepted industry jargon "dot-com". We invariably deploy efficient user-defined markets. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this quarter's conditions! The channels factor can be summed up in one word: B2C2B, customer-defined, granular, revolutionary. We will incentivize the jargon-based term "turn-key". Have you ever wanted to seize your collaborative feature set? Immediately? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our robust TQC and non-complex configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement. What do we visualize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Think super-extensible, user-defined. Think micro-leading-edge. Without relationships, you will lack metrics. Without platforms, you will lack architectures. We always productize sticky ROI metrics. That is an amazing achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things! Your budget for iterating should be at least one-half of your budget for benchmarking. It seems perplexing, but it's true! We believe we know that it is better to deliver extensibly than to iterate compellingly. We here at WorkOS have come to know that it is better to recontextualize perfectly than to empower extensibly. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "dynamic" really mean? It comes off as alarming, but it's 100 percent realistic! What does it really mean to productize "perfectly"? Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-half of your budget for engaging. Do you have a scheme to become C2C2C? The metrics for action-items are more well-understood if they are not front-end. If you facilitate iteravely, you may have to expedite perfectly. Think super-mission-critical, seamless. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and user-proof operation. What do we expedite? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We will maximize the term "seamless". We will incentivize the power of web services to streamline.