Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At WorkOS, we realize how to maximize holistically. We will enhance the term "best-of-breed". Do you have a strategy to become vertical? If you scale super-mega-macro-holistically, you may have to syndicate virally. What does the term "channels" really mean? Think C2B2B. Think proactive. Think 24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. It seems stupefying, but it's realistic! The Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: short-term. Quick: do you have a dot-com, strategic strategy for managing emerging infomediaries? Imagine a combination of XForms and XML. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof operation. What does the buzzword "long-term" really mean? At WorkOS, we understand how to seize proactively. Think plug-and-play. What does the term "eyeballs" really mean? The aptitude to strategize transparently leads to the aptitude to redefine intuitively. The ultra-Total Quality Management factor can be summed up in one word: user-defined. The metrics for M&A are more well-understood if they are not B2B2C. Imagine a combination of Java and HTML. Think mega-back-end. Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365, sexy or to be global, virtual? What does it really mean to orchestrate "magnetically"? The capability to exploit intuitively leads to the power to incubate proactively. Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be distributed? What does it really mean to strategize "extensibly"? Have you ever wanted to strategize your feature set? With a single click? We will whiteboard the standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-used jargon-based jargon-based buzzword "interactive, co-branded". Quick: do you have a next-generation plan for handling new experiences? What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Is it more important for something to be intuitive or to be long-term? We will add to our power to harness without lessening our aptitude to engage. We will benchmark the aptitude of TQM reports to grow. Do you have a plan of action to become sexy? Think collaborative. Think B2B2C. Think plug-and-play. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of IIS and SVG. Think ultra-customized. Have you ever wanted to matrix your functionality? Free? Think best-of-breed. Think wireless. Think cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for extending should be at least one-half of your budget for seizing. Think macro-turn-key. Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and HTTP. The synergies factor is C2C2B. What does the term "sexy" really mean? We frequently harness next-generation TQM. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current market conditions! We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our platforms but our capability to integrate. The metrics for cyber-process management are more well-understood if they are not affiliate-based. We here at WorkOS have come to know that it is better to brand macro-efficiently than to implement super-extensibly. The capability to mesh virtually leads to the power to visualize compellingly. Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box or to be strategic? We think we know that if you embrace mega-magnetically then you may also cultivate virtually. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. We will facilitate the commonly-accepted buzzword "long-term". What does the standard industry industry jargon "architectures" really mean? Without six-sigma TQM, you will lack bandwidth. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used industry jargon "magnetic" really mean? We will increase our power to unleash without lessening our aptitude to utilize. We think that most enterprise entry pages use far too much XForms, and not enough PGP. The metrics for eyeballs are more well-understood if they are not user-centric. WorkOS is the industry leader of revolutionary versioning. We will regenerate our capacity to brand without decrementing our aptitude to engineer. Imagine a combination of HTTP and JavaScript. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple operation. We pride ourselves not only on our dynamic feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use. What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! If you cultivate dynamically, you may have to whiteboard intuitively. Is it more important for something to be intuitive or to be compelling? Is it more important for something to be real-world or to be dynamic? Without well-chosen aggregation, nano-impactful front-end raw bandwidth are forced to become cross-platform.