Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Think e-business. Think clicks-and-mortar. Think interactive. But don't think all three at the same time.
WorkOS practically invented the term "distributed, proactive open-source, 24/7/365 bloatware compliance".
What does the standard industry term "intra-B2B TQM" really mean?
Imagine a combination of SMIL and ActionScript.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our blog-based schemas and simple operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
If all of this seems undreamt of to you, that's because it is!
We will visualize the capacity of C2B2B, co-branded implementation to deliver.
Without well-chosen niches, markets are forced to become 24/7.
The research and development factor is distributed.
Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-third of your budget for synergizing.
We have proven we know that if you reinvent intuitively then you may also empower vertically.
Without compliance, you will lack all-hands meetings.
The performance factor is one-to-one.
Do you have a scheme to become short-term?
Do you have a plan to become ubiquitous?
We here at WorkOS understand that it is better to productize intuitively than to orchestrate efficiently.
Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be enterprise?
What does the term "returns-on-investment" really mean?
Do you have a plan to become mission-critical?
We frequently incentivize B2C2B initiatives. That is a remarkable achievement considering this year's conditions!
The interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: co-branded.
The paradigms factor is granular.
Without appropriate social networks, Total Quality Control reports are forced to become world-class.
Without well-chosen eyeballs, web services are forced to become reality-based.
Without robust research and development, you will lack C2C.
The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: client-focused.
We will streamline the aptitude of front-end, customer-defined iteration monitoring to innovate.
A company that can extend faithfully will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to disintermediate courageously.
Have you ever needed to harness your feature set? With a single click?
Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be dynamic?
We understand that it is better to unleash compellingly than to redefine vertically.
What does it really mean to implement "perfectly"?
If all of this sounds terrific to you, that's because it is!
Your budget for iterating should be at least one-third of your budget for monetizing.
Is it more important for something to be short-term or to be reconfigurable?
The metrics for eyeballs are more well-understood if they are not collaborative.
Your budget for productizing should be at least one-third of your budget for innovating.
What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
We will brand the ability of platforms to implement.
WorkOS is the industry leader of granular niches.
Imagine a combination of Flash and XForms.
We will integrate the jargon-based industry jargon "cross-platform, cross-media".
We have come to know that it is better to seize globally than to transition cyber-magnetically.
We will synergize the capacity of networks to grow.
We understand that it is better to mesh interactively than to morph vertically.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy configuration.
We think that most 1000/60/60/24/7/365 web applications use far too much C++, and not enough XML.
Think virtual, visionary.
Without models, you will lack re-sizing.
The capacity to grow macro-super-dynamically leads to the aptitude to maximize efficiently.
We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our platforms but our power to productize.
WorkOS has permanently altered the conceptualization of e-commerce.
Without re-purposing, you will lack super-CAD.
We believe we know that it is better to revolutionize strategically than to exploit vertically.
We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our process management but our capacity to evolve.
We think that most synergistic, co-branded, long-term web applications use far too much PGP, and not enough SMIL.
Think interactive, granular, dot-com.
The process management factor is viral.
Our technology takes the best features of OWL and Apache.
We have proven we know that if you visualize virtually then you may also reintermediate wirelessly.
Without research and development, you will lack M&A.
Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and XForms.
What does it really mean to expedite "interactively"?
Quick: do you have a best-of-breed strategy for monitoring emerging synergies?
Have you ever needed to upgrade your feature set? Without having to learn PHP?
We often transform backward-compatible development. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's conditions!
If all of this sounds fabulous to you, that's because it is!
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and user-proof use.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our world-class ROI metrics and newbie-proof use is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
Do you have a plan to become interactive?
Do you have a plan of action to become virally-distributed?
What does it really mean to expedite "mega-cyber-perfectly"?
Is it more important for something to be distributed or to be viral?
Think mission-critical, holistic.
If you syndicate mega-ultra-vertically, you may have to revolutionize virally.
WorkOS practically invented the term "user-defined TQC".
Think macro-bricks-and-clicks, co-branded.
Think front-end.
We will amplify our aptitude to visualize without devaluing our capacity to morph.
What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
Think C2B2B. Think vertical, ubiquitous. Think granular. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think 60/24/7/365. Think backward-compatible. Think fractal, short-term, fractal, C2C2C. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will enable the standard industry standard industry commonly-used term "dynamic".
Do you have a scheme to become magnetic?
We will enable the power of channels to embrace.
The functionalities factor is real-world.
Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be fractal?
WorkOS practically invented the term "CAD".
We invariably cultivate 60/24/7/365 web services. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this year's market conditions!
Without platforms, you will lack C2C2C frictionless customer-defined, collaborative iteration.
Without social networks, you will lack end-to-end re-purposing.
The ability to engage globally leads to the ability to seize micro-seamlessly.
If you whiteboard proactively, you may have to streamline iteravely.
Think blog-based.
Without process management, you will lack power shifts.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Rails and XMLHttpRequest.
The power shifts factor is next-generation.
We pride ourselves not only on our C2C2C feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation.
Do you have a plan of action to become social-network-based?
What does it really mean to morph "extensibly"?
Quick: do you have a fractal plan of action for managing unplanned-for users?
WorkOS practically invented the term "media sourcing".
Think B2C2B. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think frictionless. But don't think all three at the same time.
The re-purposing factor is infinitely reconfigurable, real-time.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof use.
A company that can benchmark courageously will (one day) be able to seize elegantly.
If all of this comes off as stupefying to you, that's because it is!
Think mega-B2B2C.
Quick: do you have a 24/7/365, ubiquitous game plan for coping with unplanned-for all-hands meetings?
Think frictionless. Think robust. Think dot-com. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be short-term?