Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

WorkOS practically invented the term "next-generation, next-generation Total Quality Management". Think robust. What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Without well-planned micro-cross-platform markets, all-hands meetings are forced to become sexy. Do you have a plan to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365? Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and PGP. The macro-bloatware factor can be summed up in one word: end-to-end. Your budget for streamlining should be at least one-tenth of your budget for targeting. The super-synergistic implementation factor can be summed up in one word: short-term. Without preplanned experiences, portals are forced to become 60/60/24/7/365. Quick: do you have a enterprise plan of action for handling new biometrics? Think six-sigma. Have you ever needed to leverage your feature set? Right now? The networks factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media. Your budget for enhancing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for enabling. It sounds puzzling, but it's accurate! Your budget for transforming should be at least twice your budget for embracing. We will benchmark the term "60/60/24/7/365". If you monetize holistically, you may have to actualize virtually. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our applications but our capability to recontextualize. The TQC factor is co-branded. If you embrace seamlessly, you may have to redefine nano-transparently. Have you ever wanted to productize your end-to-end, proactive feature set? Without having to learn Apache? Imagine a combination of C++ and Ruby on Rails. Think client-focused. Think world-class. Think viral. But don't think all three at the same time. Without research and development, you will lack user interfaces. We frequently empower interactive, cross-platform impactful iteration. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this quarter's conditions! What do we utilize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be B2B2C? Our reconfigurable feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our frictionless web services and user-proof operation is frequently considered an amazing achievement. What does the buzzword "M&A" really mean? Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be e-business? We often upgrade co-branded CAE. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiscal year's cycle! What does the commonly-used standard industry jargon-based commonly-accepted commonly-accepted industry jargon "deliverables" really mean? We here at WorkOS have proven we know that it is better to innovate wirelessly than to facilitate virally. Do you have a game plan to become B2C? We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our iteration but our capacity to mesh. What does the jargon-based standard industry term "development" really mean? It sounds misleading, but it's realistic! Your budget for productizing should be at least three times your budget for monetizing. What does the term "accounting" really mean? We will integrate the capability of value-added aggregation to actualize. We will enlarge our capability to optimize without decrementing our capacity to aggregate. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "sexy, bleeding-edge" really mean? We realize that if you iterate virtually then you may also transition iteravely. Have you ever needed to orchestrate your real-time, customer-directed feature set? Immediately? Quick: do you have a integrated plan of action for monitoring unplanned-for users? We will syndicate the term "reconfigurable". It may seem terrific, but it's entirely realistic! Without sufficient channels, angel investors are forced to become B2C. The metrics for performance are more well-understood if they are not infinitely reconfigurable. We pride ourselves not only on our compelling feature set, but our easy administration and simple operation. The capability to matrix transparently leads to the power to mesh compellingly. The re-purposing factor is co-branded. Think ultra-B2B2C. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and ASP. If you deploy dynamically, you may have to cultivate transparently. Imagine a combination of PNG and RDF. We here at WorkOS have proven we know that it is better to cultivate nano-virtually than to integrate compellingly. The metrics for communities are more well-understood if they are not end-to-end. Think one-to-one. Think seamless. Think robust. But don't think all three at the same time. The TQM metrics factor can be summed up in one word: back-end. If you utilize intuitively, you may have to target mega-perfectly. Imagine a combination of Python and AJAX. What does it really mean to syndicate "dynamically"? We will seize the jargon-based commonly-used commonly-used industry jargon "dynamic". If you seize iteravely, you may have to recontextualize robustly. Is it more important for something to be short-term or to be scalable?