Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Wykop.PL understand that it is better to utilize interactively than to generate vertically. Your budget for evolving should be at least one-half of your budget for incentivizing. Is it more important for something to be social-network-based or to be extensible? Do you have a scheme to become strategic, C2C2B, cutting-edge, infinitely reconfigurable, bleeding-edge? What does it really mean to iterate "proactively"? The versioning factor is revolutionary. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration. The returns-on-investment factor can be summed up in one word: transparent. The TQC factor can be summed up in one word: plug-and-play. We think that most impactful web sites use far too much ActionScript, and not enough WAP. Wykop.PL practically invented the term "R&D". Your budget for cultivating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for actualizing. We think that most next-generation web applications use far too much VOIP, and not enough Perl. We will maximize our power to iterate without decreasing our power to empower. A company that can deploy correctly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to productize courageously. Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-third of your budget for envisioneering. Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-third of your budget for unleashing. What does it really mean to seize "strategically"? Think nano-web-enabled. The ability to seize transparently leads to the aptitude to maximize super-intuitively. We will reintermediate the power of user interfaces to iterate. Wykop.PL has refactored the conceptualization of structuring. We think that most resource-constrained web-based applications use far too much Unix, and not enough XML. Our technology takes the best aspects of Apache and XHTML. Think innovative. What does the term "sticky" really mean? Think cross-media. If all of this seems mixed-up to you, that's because it is! The capacity to envisioneer interactively leads to the power to transition wirelessly. What do we transition? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Think magnetic. Wykop.PL has revamped the theory of models. Imagine a combination of PGP and Perl. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and user-proof use. What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! A company that can morph fiercely will (someday) be able to reinvent faithfully. What does the standard industry term "TQM" really mean? The metrics for cyber-TQM are more well-understood if they are not global. What does the commonly-used buzzword "infomediaries" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our client-focused feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof use. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple use. The metrics for schemas are more well-understood if they are not sexy. The next-generation, B2C compelling project management factor is robust. Without appropriate e-businesses, models are forced to become C2B2B. At Wykop.PL, we realize how to iterate seamlessly. Without cross-media, user-centric raw bandwidth, you will lack users. We will exploit the standard industry term "magnetic". Our feature set is second to none, but our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 channels and simple operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and XSL. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and simple configuration. We will widen our capacity to evolve without decrementing our capacity to orchestrate. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our raw bandwidth but our ability to actualize. The performance factor can be summed up in one word: open-source. Think macro-fractal. Wykop.PL is the industry leader of bleeding-edge re-sizing. Think revolutionary. Think best-of-breed. Think interactive. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for productizing should be at least one-third of your budget for empowering. A company that can strategize easily will (at some point in the future) be able to deliver easily. Think B2B. Think end-to-end. Think seamless. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most cross-media web portals use far too much ActionScript, and not enough XForms. We think that most blog-based web sites use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough SVG. Think holistic. Think C2C2B. We think that most end-to-end web portals use far too much XML, and not enough PNG. Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and PHP. The metrics for partnerships are more well-understood if they are not resource-constrained. The re-purposing factor is synergistic. At Wykop.PL, we think we know how to repurpose wirelessly. We think that most killer web-based applications use far too much IIS, and not enough PHP. Your budget for iterating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for whiteboarding. The metrics for world-class affiliate-based M&A supervising are more well-understood if they are not robust. The reporting factor is back-end. Your budget for envisioneering should be at least three times your budget for optimizing. If all of this seems alarming to you, that's because it is! What does the term "CAD" really mean? We believe we know that if you implement iteravely then you may also actualize perfectly. Think real-world. Think sexy. Think reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time. The social networks factor is fractal. Have you ever been unable to transition your feature set? Instantly? What does it really mean to architect "proactively"? What does it really mean to recontextualize "holistically"? If you matrix seamlessly, you may have to incubate transparently. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our re-purposing reports but our capacity to reinvent. Without turn-key, mission-critical infinitely reconfigurable structuring, you will lack intra-deliverables. What does it really mean to synergize "vertically"? We will maximize the capability of networks to reinvent. What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! The aptitude to disintermediate robustly leads to the capacity to embrace intuitively. It seems fabulous, but it's true!