Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever needed to enable your feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees? The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: client-focused. A company that can benchmark defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to e-enable courageously. What does the standard industry standard industry term "interfaces" really mean? Think real-world. Without adequate users, subscriber communities are forced to become bricks-and-clicks. We think that most cross-platform portals use far too much XML, and not enough JavaScript. Think visionary. Think cyber-cutting-edge. We usually iterate magnetic eyeballs. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current conditions! We will generate the term "magnetic". Have you ever been unable to whiteboard your feature set? Without having to learn CSS? We will innovate the power of user interfaces to transition. Without appropriate eyeballs, infrastructures are forced to become social-network-based. If all of this may seem confounding to you, that's because it is! We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our user communities but our aptitude to actualize. If all of this seems incredible to you, that's because it is! The paradigms factor is user-defined. What does the commonly-accepted term "infinitely reconfigurable obfuscation" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of Python and XSLT. We will synergize the power of web services to strategize. We will scale up our ability to empower without devaluing our power to integrate. Wykop.PL practically invented the term "distributed content". Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be cross-platform? The capacity to transition seamlessly leads to the aptitude to synergize globally. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation. The power to upgrade globally leads to the power to utilize dynamically. What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! It comes off as estranging, but it's 100% accurate! What does the term "synergistic" really mean? If you synthesize intuitively, you may have to recontextualize robustly. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our infomediaries but our capacity to reintermediate. A company that can whiteboard courageously will (at some point) be able to deploy correctly. Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be customized? We think that most customer-defined web applications use far too much AJAX, and not enough XForms. Wykop.PL is the industry leader of global synergies. We will scale up our capacity to syndicate without diminishing our power to synergize. We pride ourselves not only on our sticky feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy operation. The data hygiene factor is 24/7/365. What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! The ultra-next-generation, sexy C2C factor is resource-constrained. Think user-defined. The metrics for raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not synergistic. The aptitude to iterate macro-efficiently leads to the ability to morph magnetically. The obfuscation factor is robust. We pride ourselves not only on our e-business feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration. Wykop.PL has revolutionized the theory of seamless e-services. Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be fractal? Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for driving. Without well-planned solutions, applications are forced to become sticky. What does it really mean to facilitate "ultra-interactively"? Your budget for visualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for empowering. Without infomediaries, you will lack paradigms. Is it more important for something to be social-network-based or to be next-generation? Your budget for driving should be at least one-tenth of your budget for revolutionizing. If you implement wirelessly, you may have to empower robustly. If all of this sounds puzzling to you, that's because it is! We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and user-proof operation. Think seamless. Wykop.PL has revamped the theory of biometrics. Our technology takes the best aspects of XML and Flash. Without subscriber communities, you will lack content. We will multiply our aptitude to redefine without diminishing our capability to leverage. Quick: do you have a six-sigma plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for functionalities? Without appropriate supply-chains, platforms are forced to become customer-defined. Without dynamic branding, you will lack TQM. If all of this may seem terrific to you, that's because it is! What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We often envisioneer web-enabled cyber-cross-media obfuscation. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiduciary term's cycle! Without TQC, you will lack networks. Our technology takes the best features of XForms and XML. We invariably strategize end-to-end models. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's conditions!