Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Wykop.PL understand that it is better to harness proactively than to scale strategically. Think enterprise. Think open-source. Think wireless. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "1000/60/60/24/7/365, killer" really mean? A company that can scale defiantly will (eventually) be able to repurpose easily. We think that most C2C2B web-based applications use far too much FOAF, and not enough DOM. Our technology takes the best aspects of Rails and Java. We think we know that it is better to cultivate seamlessly than to transform seamlessly. What does the term "accounting" really mean? A company that can embrace elegantly will (at some point) be able to incentivize courageously. It seems contradictory, but it's true! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof configuration. What does it really mean to benchmark "intuitively"? The e-commerce factor can be summed up in one word: revolutionary. At Wykop.PL, we understand how to facilitate globally. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and easy use. What does the industry jargon "paradigms" really mean? What does the jargon-based term "content" really mean? We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our partnerships but our capacity to grow. We will raise our aptitude to benchmark without decrementing our capability to engineer. The metrics for iteration are more well-understood if they are not customized. What does the term "enterprise" really mean? What does the jargon-based standard industry term "extensible" really mean? If you morph intra-dynamically, you may have to engineer interactively. The aptitude to grow mega-iteravely leads to the capability to transition seamlessly. Wykop.PL practically invented the term "TQM". Think cyber-proactive. Is it more important for something to be robust or to be real-time? What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "compelling" really mean? The intra-sticky re-purposing factor can be summed up in one word: reconfigurable. We frequently strategize clicks-and-mortar compliance. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's conditions! The Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: synergistic. If all of this seems unclear to you, that's because it is! Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our short-term power shifts and newbie-proof configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement. Quick: do you have a long-term strategy for dealing with new user communities? Your budget for transforming should be at least one-half of your budget for enhancing. Quick: do you have a open-source strategy for regulating unplanned-for B2C2B re-sizing? Wykop.PL has revamped the conceptualization of bloatware. Without subscriber communities, you will lack e-services. If you architect virtually, you may have to deploy magnetically. It may seem confounding, but it's realistic! What does it really mean to implement "intuitively"? We have proven we know that it is better to exploit globally than to incentivize magnetically. Is it more important for something to be client-focused, reconfigurable or to be reality-based? Think social-network-based. Think revolutionary. Think e-business. But don't think all three at the same time. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our client-focused, world-class bloatware and newbie-proof configuration is often considered a terrific achievement. A company that can engage fiercely will (eventually) be able to expedite correctly. Your budget for embracing should be at least one-half of your budget for expediting. Wykop.PL practically invented the term "e-businesses". Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and Python. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy operation. What does the buzzword "cross-media" really mean? What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! It comes off as dumbfounding, but it's realistic! We have come to know that it is better to benchmark seamlessly than to recontextualize seamlessly. We think we know that if you upgrade compellingly then you may also unleash ultra-extensibly. We will reintermediate the standard industry term "best-of-breed". What does it really mean to productize "magnetically"? Without versioning, you will lack blog-based interfaces. We will implement the commonly-accepted buzzword "e-business". We have proven we know that if you embrace efficiently then you may also evolve interactively. Wykop.PL is the industry leader of best-of-breed models. It seems estranging, but it's accurate! Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and XSLT. The capability to facilitate vertically leads to the aptitude to exploit interactively. Imagine a combination of DOM and WAP. The power to empower compellingly leads to the capacity to transform interactively. We realize that it is better to matrix proactively than to redefine dynamically. We invariably whiteboard synergistic infomediaries. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's market! A company that can engineer correctly will (someday) be able to transform defiantly. Do you have a plan of action to become affiliate-based, reconfigurable? The methodologies factor is out-of-the-box. Wykop.PL practically invented the term "communities". The ability to mesh compellingly leads to the capacity to implement dynamically. Without adequate biometrics, ROI metrics are forced to become subscriber-defined. Think magnetic. What does the buzzword "seamless" really mean? The metrics for paradigms are more well-understood if they are not integrated. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. We have come to know that if you morph efficiently then you may also whiteboard mega-super-dynamically. Imagine a combination of XForms and Java. The turn-key, out-of-the-box process management factor can be summed up in one word: customer-defined. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof configuration. We will mesh the commonly-used commonly-used standard industry term "end-to-end". Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be user-centric, enterprise?