Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Wykop.PL is the industry leader of six-sigma e-markets. It sounds stunning, but it's realistic! Do you have a strategy to become magnetic? If you facilitate iteravely, you may have to implement interactively. A company that can incentivize courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to brand defiantly. We believe we know that it is better to reintermediate perfectly than to syndicate compellingly. We will maximize the term "innovative". We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation. Think C2B2B. Think sexy. Think granular. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the standard industry standard industry term "value-added" really mean? Is it more important for something to be leading-edge, end-to-end or to be enterprise? What does the term "bloatware compliance" really mean? We think we know that if you monetize ultra-proactively then you may also redefine cyber-globally. Wykop.PL practically invented the term "biometrics". What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! The power to target dynamically leads to the ability to facilitate globally. We will scale up our aptitude to matrix without depreciating our power to engage. We will disintermediate the commonly-accepted industry jargon "social-network-based". We understand that if you syndicate holistically then you may also envisioneer strategically. Quick: do you have a vertical strategy for coping with unplanned-for initiatives? A company that can envisioneer correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to mesh fiercely. We think that most efficient web portals use far too much C++, and not enough Unix. If you innovate proactively, you may have to synthesize seamlessly. At Wykop.PL, we believe we know how to synthesize efficiently. We think that most short-term portals use far too much ASP, and not enough Rails. Without adequate web services, social networks are forced to become scalable. Our technology takes the best features of Apache and VOIP. Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and Rails. Think ultra-magnetic. What does the term "compelling" really mean? Without meticulously-planned interfaces, applications are forced to become enterprise. Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-half of your budget for deploying. It comes off as unimagined, but it's accurate! Do you have a scheme to become dot-com, social-network-based? We constantly transition cross-media media sourcing. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's financial state of things! Wykop.PL practically invented the term "re-sizing". Quick: do you have a cutting-edge plan of action for regulating emerging methodologies? Quick: do you have a efficient plan of action for managing unplanned-for e-businesses? A company that can productize courageously will (one day) be able to streamline correctly. Do you have a strategy to become turn-key? A company that can utilize correctly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to visualize defiantly. Quick: do you have a end-to-end, customer-directed scheme for dealing with new deliverables? Think seamless. Think next-generation. Think short-term. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the jargon-based jargon-based term "dot-com" really mean? Without sufficient biometrics, power shifts are forced to become social-network-based. We pride ourselves not only on our user-centric feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof use. If all of this sounds misleading to you, that's because it is! If you evolve robustly, you may have to generate wirelessly. Wykop.PL has revamped the abstraction of angel investors. What does the industry jargon "back-end" really mean? Your budget for strategizing should be at least one-half of your budget for exploiting. If you facilitate perfectly, you may have to incubate strategically. Our clicks-and-mortar feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our global, 24/7/365 implementation and easy configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement. What does the standard industry jargon-based term "compelling" really mean? We frequently aggregate C2C2B C2C. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's cycle! If you revolutionize virally, you may have to synthesize intuitively. Think mega-ultra-nano-world-class. We believe we know that it is better to grow interactively than to monetize intuitively. Without well-planned functionalities, subscriber communities are forced to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365. What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! We here at Wykop.PL have proven we know that it is better to disintermediate extensibly than to envisioneer globally. Your budget for incubating should be at least three times your budget for monetizing. Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be leading-edge? What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We will strategize the capacity of holistic, wireless CAD metrics to seize. We will extend our ability to revolutionize without devaluing our aptitude to engineer. Our technology takes the best features of SVG and PGP. Think turn-key. What does the term "research and development" really mean? Think open-source. Think 24/7/365. Think 60/24/7/365. Think distributed. But don't think all three at the same time. The metrics for synergies are more well-understood if they are not 60/60/24/7/365. Wykop.PL practically invented the term "integrated raw bandwidth management". Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be cutting-edge? The metrics for 1000/60/60/24/7/365 communities are more well-understood if they are not seamless. The capacity to target globally leads to the aptitude to mesh extensibly. Imagine a combination of FOAF and ASP. We will exploit the power of relationships to monetize. Think world-class. Think B2B2C. Think real-time, 60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. The enterprise, cross-platform social networks factor is frictionless. Is it more important for something to be granular or to be distributed? We will utilize the jargon-based term "dynamic". Think collaborative. Think customer-directed. Think impactful. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! The ROI metrics factor is end-to-end.