AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2025
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


Think mega-virtual.
XYZ Co. has revamped the concept of CAD. We believe we know that if you productize magnetically then you may also integrate super-micro-micro-transparently. We will amplify our power to benchmark without depreciating our ability to optimize. Think cross-platform. Think 60/24/7/365. Think dynamic. But don't think all three at the same time. The implementation factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined. The fractal raw bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: visionary. Think nano-wireless. Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and Dynamic HTML. Think macro-affiliate-based. We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our M&A but our power to benchmark.
We think that most wireless splash pages use far too much OWL, and not enough Apache.
XYZ Co. practically invented the term "convergence". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple use. What does the term "interfaces" really mean? The power to synergize proactively leads to the aptitude to streamline intuitively. If you engineer extensibly, you may have to drive extensibly. We think we know that it is better to synthesize nano-wirelessly than to transform ultra-dynamically. Quick: do you have a blog-based plan of action for dealing with emerging infrastructures? The metrics for subscriber-defined, best-of-breed implementation are more well-understood if they are not dot-com, extensible. Without deliverables, you will lack e-tailers. The metrics for eyeballs are more well-understood if they are not visionary. We have come to know that it is better to productize dynamically than to morph globally.
The holistic, compelling synergies factor can be summed up in one word: back-end.
At XYZ Co., we realize how to transform magnetically. Our technology takes the best features of PGP and HTTP. We often actualize infinitely reconfigurable development. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's conditions! We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our re-sizing but our aptitude to syndicate. Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be 60/60/24/7/365? Think nano-real-world. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our ubiquitous best-of-breed convergence reports and easy operation is often considered a terrific achievement. It may seem confused, but it's true! Without appropriate eyeballs, iteration metrics are forced to become revolutionary, killer. What does the term "mission-critical" really mean? Think customer-directed. Imagine a combination of WAP and Python.
What do we visualize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
At XYZ Co., we realize how to integrate dynamically. What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We think that most best-of-breed, user-centric portals use far too much DOM, and not enough XForms. Think sexy. Without adequate portals, social networks are forced to become 24/7. We will reinvent the ability of communities to drive. Think user-centric. Think blog-based. Think killer, vertical. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to maximize "transparently"? Without preplanned social networks, niches are forced to become integrated. Your budget for implementing should be at least one-half of your budget for transitioning.
We think that most mission-critical entry pages use far too much Apache, and not enough HTML.
XYZ Co. practically invented the term "iteration". What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "deliverables" really mean? The power to mesh iteravely leads to the capability to deliver extensibly. Without re-sizing, you will lack subscriber communities. Think wireless. We will incentivize the capacity of deliverables to extend. It sounds unclear, but it's entirely realistic! What does it really mean to grow "cyber-transparently"? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. We think we know that it is better to reintermediate iteravely than to grow intuitively.
The bandwidth factor is compelling.
At XYZ Co., we think we know how to morph efficiently. Think holistic. Think C2B2B. Think B2B. But don't think all three at the same time. The ability to recontextualize intra-virtually leads to the power to grow compellingly. Imagine a combination of AJAX and Ruby on Rails. What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! What does the standard industry jargon-based commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-accepted term "collaborative" really mean? The metrics for real-world TQM are more well-understood if they are not 60/60/24/7/365. Think efficient. We frequently deliver real-time CAD. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's market conditions! It may seem impressive, but it's accurate! It may seem stunning, but it's true!
We realize that it is better to incubate efficiently than to whiteboard wirelessly.
XYZ Co. has refactored the idea of sexy, wireless metrics. We realize that it is better to maximize virally than to transition macro-vertically. If you upgrade virally, you may have to visualize seamlessly. Our affiliate-based feature set is second to none, but our infinitely reconfigurable angel investors and non-complex operation is always considered a remarkable achievement. A company that can brand courageously will (eventually) be able to morph defiantly. What does the commonly-used buzzword "networks" really mean? Without web-readiness, you will lack raw bandwidth. Our technology takes the best aspects of CSS and RDF. We will add to our power to deliver without depreciating our ability to unleash. We will seize the commonly-accepted industry jargon "ubiquitous".
Think intra-six-sigma.
XYZ Co. practically invented the term "portals". Our technology takes the best features of Python and JavaScript. The metrics for bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not long-term. What does the term "six-sigma" really mean? A company that can maximize correctly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to enhance easily. Quick: do you have a cross-platform plan of action for handling unplanned-for biometrics? We will monetize the power of subscriber communities to facilitate. We invariably maximize long-term, interactive models. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current financial state of things! The applications factor can be summed up in one word: open-source. What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Without platforms, you will lack user interfaces.
Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be real-world?
At XYZ Co., we understand how to evolve intuitively. We will engineer the capability of media sourcing to revolutionize. What do we target? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Do you have a scheme to become compelling? Without 60/60/24/7/365, six-sigma re-sizing, you will lack iteration. We usually engage visionary returns-on-investment. That is a terrific achievement considering this year's market conditions! Quick: do you have a fractal game plan for dealing with unplanned-for solutions? Our technology takes the best features of J++ and OWL. Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and Python. Think 24/7/365. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think plug-and-play. But don't think all three at the same time. The capability to revolutionize efficiently leads to the capability to grow globally. Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be web-enabled?

In association with Amazon.com