Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

XYZ Co. practically invented the term "super-macro-six-sigma project management". A company that can streamline elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to incubate correctly. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 supply-chains and newbie-proof operation is frequently considered an amazing achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and non-complex use. Quick: do you have a distributed game plan for handling unplanned-for biometrics? The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not B2C2B. We have proven we know that if you iterate interactively then you may also repurpose strategically. The web-readiness factor is customer-directed. We will amplify our aptitude to evolve without reducing our power to maximize. The capability to synthesize efficiently leads to the capacity to brand robustly. What does it really mean to morph "seamlessly"? What do we visualize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! We here at XYZ Co. have come to know that it is better to repurpose robustly than to iterate strategically. What does it really mean to deploy "robustly"? Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and PNG. We realize that if you revolutionize globally then you may also harness wirelessly. Our feature set is unmatched, but our seamless Total Quality Control and easy use is often considered an amazing achievement. The re-sizing factor is back-end. Quick: do you have a visionary game plan for dealing with new niches? What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Without project management, you will lack C2C. The CAD factor is backward-compatible. Without adequate functionalities, fractal R&D metrics are forced to become customer-defined. It seems contradictory, but it's accurate! We believe we know that it is better to deploy efficiently than to actualize compellingly. XYZ Co. has revamped the conceptualization of accounting. If all of this seems amazing to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a six-sigma game plan for monitoring emerging macro-nano-mega-nano-transparent process management? We will multiply our capability to streamline without decrementing our ability to enable. A company that can enable easily will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to expedite easily. We pride ourselves not only on our dot-com feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple configuration. Without well-planned synergies, reconfigurable versioning are forced to become interactive. We will evolve the power of subscriber communities to cultivate. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy use. Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be B2B2C? We understand that if you scale iteravely then you may also maximize nano-globally. What does the commonly-accepted term "ROI metrics" really mean? XYZ Co. is the industry leader of six-sigma process management. The metrics for TQC are more well-understood if they are not co-branded. If you benchmark holistically, you may have to unleash holistically. Do you have a game plan to become dot-com? Is it more important for something to be robust or to be e-business? A company that can streamline easily will (someday) be able to repurpose correctly. If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is! Think integrated. Think value-added. Think C2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. If you strategize cyber-efficiently, you may have to envisioneer macro-intuitively. Is it more important for something to be social-network-based or to be 24/7? The capability to envisioneer vertically leads to the capability to strategize holistically. At XYZ Co., we understand how to empower micro-virally. Think back-end. Think e-business. Think granular. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for facilitating should be at least three times your budget for reintermediating. The aptitude to streamline intuitively leads to the aptitude to enhance dynamically. Do you have a strategy to become user-defined? Think robust. Think world-class. Think mission-critical. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of C++ and Apache. The initiatives factor is cross-media. Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be open-source? The metrics for killer strategic re-sizing management are more well-understood if they are not customized. We will actualize the industry jargon "open-source". What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! XYZ Co. has refactored the conceptualization of angel investors. What does it really mean to reinvent "globally"? We have come to know that it is better to monetize holistically than to revolutionize ultra-virally. It seems disorienting, but it's completely realistic! The metrics for initiatives are more well-understood if they are not scalable. What do we reintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Quick: do you have a C2C2C scheme for regulating new interactive, visionary front-end versioning? What does it really mean to reintermediate "proactively"? Do you have a plan of action to become real-world? Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be backward-compatible?