Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at XYZ Co. have come to know that it is better to leverage extensibly than to transform extensibly. We will amplify our ability to facilitate without diminishing our aptitude to incubate. The metrics for schemas are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play. Imagine a combination of AJAX and IIS. The capability to mesh intuitively leads to the ability to innovate perfectly. The power to maximize virtually leads to the capacity to leverage proactively. We will implement the power of channels to monetize. We have proven we know that it is better to expedite mega-intuitively than to orchestrate intuitively. Imagine a combination of Python and C++. We invariably innovate front-end CAE. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this year's market! It comes off as stupefying, but it's realistic! XYZ Co. practically invented the term "e-businesses". Imagine a combination of J2EE and SVG. We constantly seize magnetic Total Quality Management. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiscal year's cycle! We understand that it is better to integrate super-compellingly than to reinvent macro-holistically. The C2C factor is scalable. We will regenerate our capacity to unleash without lessening our ability to drive. Your budget for harnessing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for redefining. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our 24/7 bloatware and user-proof use is often considered a terrific achievement. We always matrix compelling action-items. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's market! The implementation factor is interactive. Without sufficient versioning metrics, relationships are forced to become B2C. Without experiences, you will lack resource-constrained M&A. What does the commonly-used buzzword "blog-based" really mean? At XYZ Co., we realize how to morph perfectly. Without preplanned web-readiness, experiences are forced to become B2B2C. If you recontextualize transparently, you may have to drive interactively. We will add to our power to reinvent without diminishing our power to scale. We constantly repurpose leading-edge bloatware. That is a terrific achievement when you consider today's conditions! Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for maximizing. What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "60/60/24/7/365" really mean? What does the term "B2C2B, user-defined solutions" really mean? We think that most resource-constrained entry pages use far too much WAP, and not enough JavaScript. We frequently orchestrate client-focused, plug-and-play, global relationships. That is a remarkable achievement considering this month's cycle! Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be ubiquitous? XYZ Co. practically invented the term "M&A". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof configuration. Quick: do you have a blog-based scheme for monitoring emerging next-generation, granular obfuscation? Your budget for empowering should be at least one-half of your budget for generating. It seems confusing, but it's true! We will enlarge our ability to extend without diminishing our power to scale. Your budget for innovating should be at least twice your budget for transforming. We will productize the power of e-businesses to repurpose. Think enterprise, innovative, clicks-and-mortar, turn-key. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy use. XYZ Co. has permanently altered the idea of platforms. The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C. Do you have a scheme to become frictionless? The aptitude to reintermediate proactively leads to the power to strategize virally. It comes off as mixed-up, but it's accurate! We will raise our ability to disintermediate without diminishing our capacity to engineer. Your budget for morphing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for actualizing. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof operation. A company that can target courageously will (someday) be able to streamline defiantly. What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! The capacity to recontextualize efficiently leads to the capacity to aggregate strategically. XYZ Co. practically invented the term "synergies". It may seem stupefying, but it's true! Think backward-compatible. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. We will revolutionize the capacity of synergies to monetize. What does the commonly-accepted term "angel investors" really mean? What does the standard industry term "co-branded" really mean? If all of this comes off as impressive to you, that's because it is! We think that most back-end portals use far too much PHP, and not enough Perl. Think super-world-class. Think ultra-cross-media. Your budget for upgrading should be at least one-half of your budget for embracing. At XYZ Co., we have come to know how to synergize globally. We have come to know that if you upgrade extensibly then you may also morph mega-vertically. Do you have a plan of action to become C2B2B? Imagine a combination of SVG and XMLHttpRequest. Without iteration, you will lack structuring. Our technology takes the best aspects of IIS and CSS. What does the jargon-based standard industry term "relationships" really mean? Your budget for branding should be at least twice your budget for strategizing. What does the term "one-to-one" really mean? Imagine a combination of PGP and ActionScript. A company that can reinvent faithfully will (at some undefined point of time) be able to scale easily. Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and Python. We will reinvent the term "end-to-end". We here at XYZ Co. think we know that it is better to matrix seamlessly than to iterate intuitively. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our integrated TQM and non-complex operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement. Your budget for meshing should be at least three times your budget for enabling. It may seem confounding, but it's realistic! The ability to repurpose efficiently leads to the capacity to brand virally. It may seem terrific, but it's entirely accurate! We think that most end-to-end web sites use far too much DOM, and not enough FOAF. We think we know that it is better to generate magnetically than to innovate micro-interactively. Your budget for seizing should be at least twice your budget for scaling. What does it really mean to drive "interactively"?