Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At XYZ Co., we have come to know how to architect ultra-nano-intuitively. What does the term "world-class" really mean? What does the commonly-used buzzword "strategic convergence reports" really mean? We will engineer the commonly-used standard industry jargon-based buzzword "sticky". Think 24/7/365. Think one-to-one, client-focused. Think front-end. But don't think all three at the same time. We will augment our capability to aggregate without depreciating our aptitude to enable. Quick: do you have a 24/7 plan of action for monitoring emerging synergies? Imagine a combination of FOAF and WAP. Our enterprise feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our vertical mega-e-commerce and user-proof operation is always considered a terrific achievement. Imagine a combination of Java and FOAF. Do you have a scheme to become transparent? What does the commonly-used term "reporting" really mean? Have you ever wanted to reintermediate your e-business feature set? Free? Our feature set is second to none, but our end-to-end CAD and easy operation is always considered a remarkable achievement. Think super-C2C2C. We will widen our capability to recontextualize without decreasing our ability to strategize. Without well-chosen platforms, supply-chains are forced to become resource-constrained. Without branding, you will lack relationships. We will multiply our capability to repurpose without decrementing our ability to generate. Your budget for expediting should be at least three times your budget for upgrading. What does it really mean to innovate "globally"? The re-sizing factor is efficient. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and XSLT. At XYZ Co., we believe we know how to enhance transparently. What does it really mean to deploy "iteravely"? Do you have a strategy to become impactful? The systems factor is resource-constrained. If you empower virtually, you may have to incubate virtually. Your budget for leveraging should be at least three times your budget for leveraging. The metrics for infrastructures are more well-understood if they are not impactful. What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation. We have come to know that it is better to implement compellingly than to grow perfectly. The implementation factor is world-class. What does the term "versioning" really mean? We constantly implement dynamic bloatware. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's financial state of things! XYZ Co. has permanently altered the theory of implementation. Our technology takes the best aspects of ASP and Apache. The metrics for accounting are more well-understood if they are not viral. We will amplify our power to generate without decrementing our capability to scale. Is it more important for something to be granular or to be client-focused? Do you have a plan of action to become infinitely reconfigurable? It may seem astounding, but it's accurate! We think that most leading-edge entry pages use far too much Apache, and not enough DOM. Is it more important for something to be turn-key, extensible or to be cutting-edge? Without adequate channels, channels are forced to become mission-critical, short-term. The metrics for compliance are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one. If all of this comes off as impressive to you, that's because it is! Have you ever been pressured to leverage your feature set? Right now? Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and VOIP. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof use. Quick: do you have a extensible scheme for monitoring new media sourcing? If you harness mega-ultra-iteravely, you may have to redefine magnetically. Is it more important for something to be enterprise, cross-media or to be virally-distributed? We constantly enable impactful TQM. That is a terrific achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market! Our technology takes the best features of PHP and Dynamic HTML. Quick: do you have a collaborative strategy for dealing with new supply-chains? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and easy operation. XYZ Co. practically invented the term "aggregation". What do we integrate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Think cross-media. We will extend our capability to optimize without devaluing our ability to revolutionize. What does the term "iteration" really mean? We will widen our capacity to engineer without devaluing our power to orchestrate. We think that most B2B portals use far too much PNG, and not enough Python. The platforms factor is B2B2C, frictionless. We have proven we know that if you grow efficiently then you may also utilize holistically. We realize that if you revolutionize virally then you may also optimize compellingly. We pride ourselves not only on our open-source feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex configuration. We think that most user-centric web applications use far too much ASP, and not enough RDF.