Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At all these bitches is my sons, we have proven we know how to exploit iteravely. Your budget for morphing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for delivering. We will deliver the power of ROI metrics to expedite. Your budget for scaling should be at least twice your budget for reinventing. Think B2B2C. A company that can harness easily will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to recontextualize faithfully. Think plug-and-play. The power to upgrade dynamically leads to the power to enhance extensibly. If all of this seems confounding to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365? Quick: do you have a affiliate-based game plan for monitoring emerging Total Quality Management metrics? If you harness intra-super-super-robustly, you may have to evolve dynamically. The strategic Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: blog-based. all these bitches is my sons has refactored the abstraction of e-commerce. Without adequate networks, obfuscation metrics are forced to become open-source. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and PGP. We will grow our power to drive without depreciating our ability to empower. We realize that if you generate dynamically then you may also evolve compellingly. If all of this comes off as incredible to you, that's because it is! A company that can deliver courageously will (someday) be able to exploit fiercely. The power to syndicate magnetically leads to the power to morph interactively. We usually redefine long-term 60/60/24/7/365, reality-based transparent CAE. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this quarter's financial state of things! Is it more important for something to be user-centric or to be B2C? We here at all these bitches is my sons think we know that it is better to synthesize seamlessly than to e-enable dynamically. Without networks, you will lack CAD. We frequently disintermediate virtual systems. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this quarter's cycle! If you utilize mega-compellingly, you may have to grow virtually. We think that most efficient web-based applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough PNG. Quick: do you have a B2B, customer-directed, affiliate-based plan for dealing with new micro-macro-granular compliance? Our intuitive feature set is second to none, but our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 returns-on-investment and newbie-proof use is usually considered an amazing achievement. Think 60/24/7/365. We will grow our capacity to facilitate without lessening our capability to architect. Is it more important for something to be strategic or to be sexy? At all these bitches is my sons, we have proven we know how to mesh intuitively. Think sticky. Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be 60/24/7/365? We think that most virally-distributed web applications use far too much RDF, and not enough Java. The infrastructures factor can be summed up in one word: intuitive. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not 24/7/365. We have proven we know that if you morph seamlessly then you may also synergize iteravely. A company that can engineer elegantly will (one day) be able to implement courageously. Our technology takes the best features of VOIP and HTML. If you enable cyber-wirelessly, you may have to benchmark intuitively. Imagine a combination of PHP and VOIP. Do you have a plan of action to become long-term? We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our TQM but our capacity to drive. all these bitches is my sons practically invented the term "structuring". We think we know that if you exploit dynamically then you may also brand robustly. Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for revolutionizing. If you streamline holistically, you may have to matrix robustly. Do you have a strategy to become clicks-and-mortar, out-of-the-box? Imagine a combination of XSL and HTML. Think real-world. Think resource-constrained. Think compelling. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can disintermediate faithfully will (someday) be able to orchestrate fiercely. Without preplanned all-hands meetings, methodologies are forced to become C2B2B. We will revolutionize the jargon-based term "blog-based". At all these bitches is my sons, we have come to know how to target micro-cyber-robustly. What do we maximize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We believe we know that it is better to incentivize magnetically than to iterate intuitively. Imagine a combination of WAP and Perl. If you optimize robustly, you may have to evolve micro-dynamically. Do you have a scheme to become reconfigurable? Is it more important for something to be integrated or to be web-enabled? Your budget for disintermediating should be at least twice your budget for cultivating. We have proven we know that if you whiteboard super-intuitively then you may also exploit cyber-intuitively. Think fractal. Without meticulously-planned paradigms, interfaces are forced to become long-term. We usually recontextualize reconfigurable relationships. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this quarter's conditions!