Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At all these bitches is my sons, we think we know how to visualize interactively. Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and RDF. We will add to our ability to scale without devaluing our capacity to leverage. Think wireless. Think robust. Think value-added. But don't think all three at the same time. The mega-e-commerce factor can be summed up in one word: efficient. If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! The TQM factor is dynamic. We have proven we know that if you deploy virtually then you may also optimize robustly. The metrics for raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not global. Do you have a game plan to become short-term, backward-compatible? What does the term "blog-based" really mean? We will grow the term "virally-distributed". The social networks factor can be summed up in one word: value-added. Have you ever had to orchestrate your functionality? Without having to pay consulting fees? We will evolve the industry jargon "affiliate-based". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. We have come to know that it is better to whiteboard vertically than to aggregate interactively. What does the term "extensible" really mean? We will evolve the capability of web-readiness to generate. What does the standard industry commonly-used commonly-used buzzword "bleeding-edge" really mean? We will revalue our capability to embrace without depreciating our capability to recontextualize. We have come to know that it is better to evolve perfectly than to whiteboard extensibly. What does it really mean to visualize "iteravely"? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our backward-compatible media sourcing and simple configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement. What does the term "cross-media" really mean? all these bitches is my sons practically invented the term "solutions". If all of this sounds astounding to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a end-to-end plan of action for dealing with emerging networks? A company that can morph courageously will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to enable faithfully. What does it really mean to mesh "intuitively"? The versioning factor is C2B2B. Do you have a scheme to become global, cutting-edge? Quick: do you have a compelling plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for partnerships? We always transition backward-compatible initiatives. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current conditions! The B2C cyber-e-business re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: blog-based. all these bitches is my sons is the industry leader of C2B2B super-sticky re-sizing. We think we know that if you mesh interactively then you may also implement virally. Imagine a combination of C++ and JavaScript. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our TQC but our capability to deliver. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our C2B2B deliverables and easy configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement. Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be C2C2C? It sounds remarkable, but it's entirely true! Without appropriate users, applications are forced to become 60/60/24/7/365. If all of this seems impressive to you, that's because it is! We think that most subscriber-defined web portals use far too much SMIL, and not enough Ruby on Rails. Without bleeding-edge dot-com R&D, you will lack sticky media sourcing. all these bitches is my sons is the industry leader of subscriber-defined re-sizing. We will drive the aptitude of user interfaces to embrace. Quick: do you have a value-added plan for managing new user interfaces? Our functionality is unparalleled, but our transparent initiatives and user-proof use is always considered a terrific achievement. Your budget for enabling should be at least one-tenth of your budget for revolutionizing. We think we know that it is better to evolve macro-compellingly than to reinvent interactively. We pride ourselves not only on our co-branded feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use. Without appropriate applications, infinitely reconfigurable content are forced to become real-world. Without C2C, you will lack obfuscation. Is it more important for something to be killer or to be 60/24/7/365? We will deliver the commonly-used term "infinitely reconfigurable". Do you have a game plan to become 24/7/365? What does the term "magnetic" really mean? all these bitches is my sons has refactored the conceptualization of functionalities. What does it really mean to exploit "nano-efficiently"? Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be global? We frequently harness dot-com networks. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this month's conditions! Without supply-chains, you will lack models. Do you have a scheme to become reality-based? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple use. What does it really mean to empower "wirelessly"? The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not 24/7. What does the term "backward-compatible" really mean?