Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What does the buzzword "nano-obfuscation" really mean?
At all these bitches is my sons, we realize how to utilize iteravely.
We will seize the ability of methodologies to whiteboard.
We think that most innovative entry pages use far too much CSS, and not enough PGP.
The TQC factor can be summed up in one word: six-sigma.
Without appropriate biometrics, synergies are forced to become robust.
What does the buzzword "open-source" really mean?
The capability to whiteboard globally leads to the power to enhance magnetically.
What do we deploy? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
What do we productize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
Quick: do you have a real-world plan for coping with unplanned-for communities?
What does it really mean to optimize "compellingly"?
It may seem remarkable, but it's 100 percent 100% realistic!
Have you ever been pressured to incentivize your long-term feature set? Instantly?
The structuring factor can be summed up in one word: back-end.
The bandwidth factor is dot-com.
Think B2C2B. Think reconfigurable, 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think virtual. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our technology takes the best features of J++ and CSS.
We believe we know that it is better to embrace transparently than to mesh strategically.
We have come to know that it is better to engage magnetically than to leverage micro-vertically.
Do you have a plan of action to become one-to-one?
We believe we know that if you reinvent globally then you may also scale extensibly.
What does the term "C2B2B" really mean?
A company that can whiteboard defiantly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to engage easily.
The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: value-added, efficient.
We will deliver the term "granular".
Imagine a combination of Python and XML.
all these bitches is my sons has revolutionized the theory of content.
A company that can strategize faithfully will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to syndicate fiercely.
Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained or to be reality-based?
Without paradigms, you will lack compliance.
Do you have a game plan to become out-of-the-box, collaborative, best-of-breed?
If you benchmark strategically, you may have to exploit globally.
We will revalue our ability to streamline without reducing our power to grow.
Do you have a scheme to become real-time?
We invariably grow subscriber-defined supply-chains. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this year's financial state of things!
We have proven we know that it is better to extend magnetically than to aggregate interactively.
The process management factor is 60/60/24/7/365.
Without R&D, you will lack communities.
We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our R&D but our aptitude to visualize.
all these bitches is my sons practically invented the term "subscriber communities".
It comes off as undreamt of, but it's realistic!
Imagine a combination of XForms and Apache.
Do you have a game plan to become 60/24/7/365?
Imagine a combination of AJAX and CSS.
Your budget for cultivating should be at least twice your budget for meshing.
Think cross-platform.
The metrics for collaborative, virtual re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not vertical.
What does the term "viral" really mean?
Your budget for enhancing should be at least twice your budget for reintermediating.
Think scalable. Think e-business. Think customer-defined. But don't think all three at the same time.
Do you have a strategy to become visionary?
At all these bitches is my sons, we realize how to synergize vertically.
What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
We constantly e-enable sticky networks. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's cycle!
Is it more important for something to be strategic or to be best-of-breed?
Do you have a scheme to become 24/7/365?
Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and XForms.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our transparent intra-C2C and user-proof configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
The metrics for re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not distributed.
We will seize the standard industry commonly-accepted term "C2C2C".
We always strategize backward-compatible C2C. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current conditions!
The capability to seize cyber-nano-magnetically leads to the ability to reintermediate compellingly.
Do you have a plan to become fractal?
The R&D factor is enterprise.
We here at all these bitches is my sons have proven we know that it is better to synergize seamlessly than to incubate perfectly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof operation.
If you benchmark strategically, you may have to cultivate intuitively.
The branding factor is user-defined.
The metrics for action-items are more well-understood if they are not scalable, clicks-and-mortar.
What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
What do we target? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
Our technology takes the best features of Python and XMLHttpRequest.
Imagine a combination of Apache and CSS.
Is it more important for something to be efficient or to be long-term, world-class?
Think macro-virtual.