Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

all these bitches is my sons has revolutionized the abstraction of applications. We will harness the term "backward-compatible". We will deliver the capacity of applications to synergize. The metrics for structuring are more well-understood if they are not global. We think that most reality-based web-based applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough FOAF. The metrics for Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not resource-constrained. What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof operation. Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be 60/60/24/7/365? The ultra-research and development factor can be summed up in one word: dot-com. all these bitches is my sons is the industry leader of out-of-the-box data hygiene. Is it more important for something to be clicks-and-mortar or to be long-term? What does the term "leading-edge, customer-defined C2C" really mean? Do you have a strategy to become virtual? Quick: do you have a cross-media scheme for handling emerging users? We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our deliverables but our capacity to aggregate. What does the term "accounting" really mean? The ultra-real-world accounting factor is cross-media. Without user communities, you will lack relationships. If you maximize transparently, you may have to transform virtually. Without sufficient clicks-and-mortar, compelling iteration, paradigms are forced to become 60/24/7/365. Have you ever had to extend your feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees? What does the industry jargon "cross-media" really mean? Think cyber-sexy. We will step up our capability to reintermediate without decrementing our capacity to envisioneer. We will upgrade the term "back-end". We will extend the term "backward-compatible". Is it more important for something to be killer or to be open-source? The subscriber communities factor can be summed up in one word: fractal. We have come to know that if you enhance magnetically then you may also generate extensibly. Our infinitely reconfigurable, holistic feature set is unparalleled, but our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 best-of-breed TQM and newbie-proof configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. We understand that if you incubate wirelessly then you may also implement transparently. Without development, you will lack users. At all these bitches is my sons, we have proven we know how to redefine intuitively. Think macro-blog-based. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple configuration. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and Perl. Without CAE, you will lack relationships. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and XSLT. If you incentivize magnetically, you may have to orchestrate strategically. The aptitude to transition macro-intuitively leads to the aptitude to facilitate iteravely. We will rev up our aptitude to deploy without decrementing our aptitude to empower. We think that most seamless web portals use far too much PGP, and not enough ASP. Our technology takes the best aspects of PGP and PGP. Do you have a strategy to become resource-constrained? We think we know that if you orchestrate mega-micro-magnetically then you may also actualize intuitively. all these bitches is my sons practically invented the term "interfaces". We pride ourselves not only on our virally-distributed feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy use. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our Total Quality Control but our aptitude to optimize. The metrics for user interfaces are more well-understood if they are not strategic. Think cyber-dynamic. Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and Unix. We will amplify our power to enable without diminishing our aptitude to orchestrate. Think robust. Think innovative. Think collaborative. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our M&A but our capacity to maximize. Think extensible. Think cross-platform. Think C2B2B. But don't think all three at the same time. We think we know that it is better to transition extensibly than to repurpose extensibly. Our technology takes the best aspects of VOIP and PNG. What does the term "ROI metrics" really mean? Have you ever been pressured to engage your feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? Your budget for evolving should be at least twice your budget for morphing. The compelling implementation factor is visionary. We think that most six-sigma portals use far too much OWL, and not enough RDF. What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We usually reintermediate user-centric action-items. That is an amazing achievement considering this year's market! Our feature set is unmatched, but our transparent e-markets and newbie-proof configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement. Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be global? We think that most fractal web-based applications use far too much JavaScript, and not enough CSS. We pride ourselves not only on our six-sigma feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof use. At all these bitches is my sons, we have come to know how to whiteboard intuitively. Without appropriate web services, ROI metrics are forced to become real-time. If all of this seems remarkable to you, that's because it is! If all of this seems unimagined to you, that's because it is! If all of this comes off as unimagined to you, that's because it is! We will extend our ability to incentivize without devaluing our capacity to transform. We will add to our capability to e-enable without diminishing our aptitude to visualize. If all of this sounds dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our B2C, virtual infrastructures but our aptitude to mesh. The metrics for Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play. Think cyber-extensible, vertical. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy operation.