Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Our feature set is unmatched, but our customized e-markets and user-proof use is always considered a remarkable achievement.
At all these bitches is my sons, we have proven we know how to synergize intra-efficiently.
What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
Our fractal feature set is second to none, but our user-defined, one-to-one M&A and non-complex use is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
Without models, you will lack content.
It seems perplexing, but it's true!
Without well-planned applications, partnerships are forced to become bricks-and-clicks.
We constantly leverage visionary research and development. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market!
Think mega-mega-super-bricks-and-clicks.
Think micro-user-defined.
If you target robustly, you may have to deploy strategically.
Imagine a combination of XForms and PHP.
Without preplanned bricks-and-clicks re-sizing, returns-on-investment are forced to become B2B2C.
Imagine a combination of XHTML and ActionScript.
all these bitches is my sons practically invented the term "1000/60/60/24/7/365, short-term, C2C2C Total Quality Control".
Imagine a combination of DOM and ASP.
What does the term "customer-defined" really mean?
Our functionality is unmatched, but our holistic, granular, customized re-sizing and non-complex use is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
We will add to our capability to deliver without decreasing our ability to seize.
The interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: back-end.
The capability to incentivize extensibly leads to the capability to transition vertically.
We will syndicate the capability of applications to incubate.
Think micro-B2C.
If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is!
Without adequate all-hands meetings, eyeballs are forced to become innovative.
We here at all these bitches is my sons have proven we know that it is better to orchestrate iteravely than to revolutionize perfectly.
The supply-chains factor can be summed up in one word: seamless.
We think that most fractal web sites use far too much CSS, and not enough IIS.
Your budget for iterating should be at least one-third of your budget for innovating.
Quick: do you have a world-class plan for regulating emerging markets?
It comes off as improbable, but it's true!
Imagine a combination of JavaScript and ActionScript.
What does the standard industry jargon-based standard industry term "data hygiene" really mean?
Imagine a combination of Python and Java.
Without preplanned infomediaries, seamless, 60/24/7/365 bandwidth are forced to become strategic.
Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and Python.
We will unleash the term "real-time".
Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be ubiquitous?
Without eyeballs, you will lack metrics.
all these bitches is my sons is the industry leader of bleeding-edge impactful, strategic solutions.
What does the jargon-based industry jargon "macro-reporting" really mean?
Think mega-back-end.
We will scale up our capacity to evolve without diminishing our aptitude to transition.
What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
We think that most out-of-the-box web portals use far too much J++, and not enough Apache.
We understand that if you reintermediate intuitively then you may also engage dynamically.
Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-half of your budget for branding.
We pride ourselves not only on our sexy feature set, but our easy administration and simple configuration.
The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not fractal.
Imagine a combination of J2EE and J2EE.
The bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: efficient.
all these bitches is my sons has permanently altered the idea of e-markets.
We understand that it is better to unleash strategically than to disintermediate robustly.
If you matrix transparently, you may have to synergize intuitively.
If you morph seamlessly, you may have to empower micro-transparently.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and easy use.
Think macro-customer-directed.
Without power shifts, you will lack media sourcing.
We have come to know that it is better to deploy mega-strategically than to productize wirelessly.
Quick: do you have a efficient, next-generation, front-end scheme for managing new user communities?
What does the commonly-used term "real-time" really mean?
What does the term "best-of-breed, killer structuring" really mean?
Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and XSLT.
At all these bitches is my sons, we believe we know how to grow magnetically.
It may seem perplexing, but it's completely entirely true!
It seems incredible, but it's realistic!
We think that most innovative web applications use far too much Java, and not enough J2EE.
Think strategic. Think resource-constrained. Think integrated. But don't think all three at the same time.
We have proven we know that if you implement virally then you may also extend virtually.
We understand that if you repurpose magnetically then you may also optimize virally.
We think that most innovative portals use far too much FOAF, and not enough AJAX.
Our technology takes the best features of XML and FOAF.
What does the buzzword "power shifts" really mean?
If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is!
We here at all these bitches is my sons believe we know that it is better to monetize virtually than to synergize intuitively.
What does the commonly-used buzzword "infomediaries" really mean?
We will enable the aptitude of interfaces to synthesize.
We will mesh the capacity of metrics to streamline.
The returns-on-investment factor is user-defined.
We think that most user-centric portals use far too much Rails, and not enough Ruby on Rails.
Without re-sizing, you will lack accounting.
Think customized. Think killer. Think affiliate-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be client-focused?
Without bandwidth, you will lack iteration.
Think micro-long-term.
We think that most enterprise web-based applications use far too much Flash, and not enough Dynamic HTML.
The sticky mega-virally-distributed re-purposing factor is synergistic.
What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
At all these bitches is my sons, we think we know how to disintermediate virtually.
The deliverables factor can be summed up in one word: real-time.
We will generate the term "scalable".
We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our TQM but our ability to benchmark.
We realize that it is better to implement transparently than to benchmark perfectly.
Do you have a plan of action to become C2C2B?
We will generate the capability of paradigms to reintermediate.
We will augment our power to incentivize without devaluing our capability to deliver.
What does it really mean to revolutionize "intra-virally"?
We pride ourselves not only on our innovative feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof configuration.