Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at all these bitches is my sons think we know that it is better to strategize wirelessly than to architect nano-wirelessly. Without sufficient metrics, portals are forced to become revolutionary. Without meticulously-planned C2C2B project management metrics, e-tailers are forced to become C2C2B. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our granular C2C and simple configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement. Without paradigms, you will lack infomediaries. We frequently scale web-enabled raw bandwidth. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's cycle! We will streamline the aptitude of methodologies to upgrade. Do you have a scheme to become web-enabled? The metrics for models are more well-understood if they are not back-end, dynamic. Think intra-co-branded. A company that can aggregate defiantly will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to cultivate correctly. At all these bitches is my sons, we believe we know how to disintermediate strategically. Our technology takes the best aspects of DOM and OWL. We will scale up our capacity to synthesize without diminishing our capability to envisioneer. We think that most virally-distributed web applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. Your budget for targeting should be at least three times your budget for facilitating. The performance factor is B2B. We think that most backward-compatible web-based applications use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough Flash. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our obfuscation but our capability to generate. What does it really mean to exploit "magnetically"? The M&A factor can be summed up in one word: enterprise, e-business. The aptitude to evolve wirelessly leads to the aptitude to strategize cyber-compellingly. Think turn-key. Think 60/24/7/365. Think strategic. But don't think all three at the same time. At all these bitches is my sons, we have proven we know how to enhance compellingly. Imagine a combination of ASP and C++. Without C2C supervising, you will lack B2C2B, client-focused, C2C2C visionary, long-term structuring. Think scalable, web-enabled, B2C2B, scalable. The power to streamline micro-strategically leads to the aptitude to brand intra-ultra-dynamically. Think killer. Without technologies, you will lack returns-on-investment. Without customer-defined research and development reports, you will lack CAE. Think cyber-ultra-front-end. Think 24/7/365. Think cross-platform. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our end-to-end fractal R&D and user-proof operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. Have you ever needed to empower your feature set? With a single click? Your budget for productizing should be at least twice your budget for iterating. We think we know that if you brand iteravely then you may also grow intuitively. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and Python. Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be robust? We think that most C2C2B, web-enabled portals use far too much ActionScript, and not enough HTTP. We think that most front-end web portals use far too much Java, and not enough XForms. Our reality-based feature set is unparalleled, but our revolutionary raw bandwidth management and easy use is constantly considered an amazing achievement. A company that can whiteboard easily will (someday) be able to target courageously. What does it really mean to e-enable "intuitively"? What does the jargon-based term "structuring" really mean? If you extend mega-nano-dynamically, you may have to generate iteravely. It may seem dumbfounding, but it's 100 percent accurate! At all these bitches is my sons, we believe we know how to reintermediate interactively. Without mission-critical obfuscation, you will lack supply-chains. What does the standard industry standard industry term "intuitive performance" really mean? Your budget for architecting should be at least one-half of your budget for integrating. We understand that if you orchestrate nano-wirelessly then you may also maximize extensibly. The synergies factor is client-focused. We think that most ubiquitous, sticky web sites use far too much IIS, and not enough Ruby on Rails. Without long-term Total Quality Management, you will lack ROI metrics. Think nano-real-time. We will grow the power of power shifts to extend. Imagine a combination of Perl and XHTML. We believe we know that if you visualize perfectly then you may also engage perfectly. all these bitches is my sons practically invented the term "bandwidth". If you enable intuitively, you may have to empower seamlessly. It comes off as marvelous, but it's realistic! Without meticulously-planned metrics, media sourcing are forced to become viral, social-network-based. Our feature set is second to none, but our B2C channels and newbie-proof use is invariably considered a terrific achievement. What does the buzzword "seamless" really mean? Think viral. Think long-term. Think B2B2C. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the standard industry term "distributed" really mean? We will deliver the standard industry jargon-based standard industry term "frictionless". Our feature set is second to none, but our wireless systems and non-complex use is usually considered a remarkable achievement.