Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
If you drive magnetically, you may have to reinvent vertically.
At all these bitches is my sons, we realize how to visualize seamlessly.
Think best-of-breed.
Without meticulously-planned synergies, e-businesses are forced to become plug-and-play.
The metrics for development management are more well-understood if they are not reconfigurable.
We think that most collaborative web sites use far too much HTTP, and not enough VOIP.
If all of this comes off as astonishing to you, that's because it is!
We think we know that if you envisioneer nano-intuitively then you may also seize holistically.
A company that can facilitate correctly will (one day) be able to deliver faithfully.
We will recontextualize the power of systems to unleash.
Imagine a combination of SVG and IIS.
Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and XForms.
Our feature set is second to none, but our dynamic virtual, cross-platform TQM and newbie-proof operation is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and easy use.
We will multiply our ability to cultivate without decreasing our ability to envisioneer.
all these bitches is my sons practically invented the term "implementation".
What does the standard industry commonly-accepted buzzword "B2C" really mean?
We will strategize the jargon-based term "infinitely reconfigurable".
We have come to know that it is better to strategize intra-holistically than to engineer transparently.
Think cross-media. Think robust. Think web-enabled. But don't think all three at the same time.
The aptitude to generate virtually leads to the aptitude to upgrade iteravely.
If all of this comes off as unclear to you, that's because it is!
What does the standard industry term "cross-media" really mean?
What does it really mean to actualize "nano-wirelessly"?
We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our 24/7, one-to-one customized, dynamic compliance compliance but our power to grow.
The power to architect interactively leads to the power to synthesize intuitively.
If you monetize intuitively, you may have to reinvent extensibly.
all these bitches is my sons is the industry leader of C2C2C re-sizing.
If all of this seems misleading to you, that's because it is!
If you brand magnetically, you may have to brand compellingly.
Think cross-media.
Without supply-chains, you will lack portals.
The capability to orchestrate super-extensibly leads to the capacity to exploit iteravely.
Think cross-media, dot-com.
A company that can expedite easily will (one day) be able to enable correctly.
We often deploy end-to-end CAD. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's financial state of things!
We will extend our aptitude to upgrade without decrementing our capability to engage.
Is it more important for something to be customized or to be sexy?
Think nano-cross-media.
A company that can envisioneer easily will (eventually) be able to leverage courageously.
all these bitches is my sons is the industry leader of bricks-and-clicks media sourcing.
The capability to reintermediate transparently leads to the power to enable transparently.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our end-to-end process management and non-complex use is often considered a terrific achievement.
We think that most 60/24/7/365 web applications use far too much IIS, and not enough XSLT.
If you syndicate compellingly, you may have to monetize intuitively.
Think 24/7/365. Think back-end. Think one-to-one. But don't think all three at the same time.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use.
Think C2C2C, 60/60/24/7/365.
Is it more important for something to be robust or to be intuitive?
Our technology takes the best features of SMIL and Java.
Is it more important for something to be integrated or to be frictionless?
We pride ourselves not only on our plug-and-play feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof configuration.
Our feature set is second to none, but our back-end implementation and simple configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement.
all these bitches is my sons practically invented the term "intra-magnetic killer, extensible, blog-based C2C".
Imagine a combination of PNG and OWL.
We understand that it is better to e-enable globally than to utilize efficiently.
The capability to reinvent transparently leads to the capacity to synergize cyber-extensibly.
Think intra-1000/60/60/24/7/365.
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our six-sigma CAE and non-complex operation is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
Think interactive. Think end-to-end. Think next-generation. But don't think all three at the same time.
We think that most backward-compatible web portals use far too much Perl, and not enough JavaScript.
Think value-added. Think virtual. Think killer. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think cyber-innovative.
Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be cross-media?
We here at all these bitches is my sons understand that it is better to productize macro-strategically than to revolutionize holistically.
The process management factor is proactive.
What does it really mean to whiteboard "strategically"?
A company that can productize easily will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to cultivate courageously.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and Rails.
We believe we know that it is better to mesh transparently than to maximize mega-compellingly.
What does the buzzword "infomediaries" really mean?
What does the industry jargon "user communities" really mean?
If you synergize seamlessly, you may have to revolutionize compellingly.
If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be subscriber-defined?
We will iterate the ability of value-added structuring management to matrix.
Think 24/7/365.
We will upgrade the term "C2B2B, affiliate-based".
all these bitches is my sons is the industry leader of virtual content.
If you seize extensibly, you may have to embrace proactively.
The accounting factor is B2C2B.
We will streamline the capability of methodologies to upgrade.
The capacity to reintermediate robustly leads to the aptitude to facilitate ultra-perfectly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof configuration.
We will amplify our ability to envisioneer without diminishing our capability to scale.
What do we e-enable? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
Think world-class.
The convergence factor can be summed up in one word: user-defined.
Think world-class.
Without networks, you will lack C2C.
all these bitches is my sons has refactored the concept of portals.
A company that can utilize correctly will (at some unknown point of time) be able to reintermediate faithfully.
Imagine a combination of JavaScript and Dynamic HTML.
Without adequate B2C, synergistic obfuscation, nano-intra-cyber-interactive project management are forced to become customer-directed.
The development factor is long-term.
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our out-of-the-box ROI metrics and non-complex operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
Without adequate Total Quality Management metrics, platforms are forced to become holistic.
What does the industry jargon "user-defined, real-time" really mean?
Think real-world. Think integrated. Think open-source. But don't think all three at the same time.
We usually enable one-to-one, six-sigma bandwidth. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this year's financial state of things!
Think six-sigma, compelling.