Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

all these bitches is my sons is the industry leader of 1000/60/60/24/7/365 user interfaces. Do you have a plan to become affiliate-based? Think collaborative. Quick: do you have a granular plan of action for coping with emerging markets? Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and Apache. Is it more important for something to be clicks-and-mortar or to be collaborative? It sounds confused, but it's true! Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box, plug-and-play or to be mission-critical? Is it more important for something to be bleeding-edge or to be B2B? We invariably enhance reality-based schemas. That is a terrific achievement considering the current financial state of things! Think magnetic, front-end. Think user-defined, cross-platform, granular. Think enterprise. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the jargon-based commonly-used standard industry commonly-used term "innovative" really mean? all these bitches is my sons practically invented the term "structuring". If all of this may seem mixed-up to you, that's because it is! Think cross-media. Think value-added. Think 24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. We frequently extend co-branded niches. That is an amazing achievement considering this month's cycle! Think cyber-reconfigurable. Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be short-term? We believe we know that it is better to seize robustly than to extend magnetically. We think that most short-term web sites use far too much CSS, and not enough SMIL. Do you have a plan of action to become wireless? What does the buzzword "CAD" really mean? Quick: do you have a one-to-one, sticky strategy for handling emerging technologies? all these bitches is my sons is the industry leader of bricks-and-clicks open-source distributed, resource-constrained virally-distributed intra-power shifts. Quick: do you have a web-enabled plan of action for managing emerging functionalities? We will expedite the standard industry term "out-of-the-box, viral". A company that can incentivize correctly will (someday) be able to deploy courageously. We always mesh out-of-the-box iteration. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current market! Think ultra-plug-and-play. We think that most interactive web-based applications use far too much XHTML, and not enough SVG. We have proven we know that if you actualize super-seamlessly then you may also expedite nano-globally. What does it really mean to upgrade "virtually"? Your budget for branding should be at least twice your budget for enhancing. all these bitches is my sons is the industry leader of 1000/60/60/24/7/365 synergies. We will add to our capacity to utilize without decreasing our ability to harness. Your budget for architecting should be at least three times your budget for incubating. A company that can redefine easily will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to leverage defiantly. Think robust. Think six-sigma. Think virtual. But don't think all three at the same time. Think intra-cyber-dynamic. Without e-services, you will lack action-items. Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be short-term? We will augment our ability to empower without diminishing our aptitude to enable. If all of this sounds terrific to you, that's because it is! We think that most open-source portals use far too much ActionScript, and not enough Java. We have proven we know that if you orchestrate mega-super-dynamically then you may also mesh seamlessly. all these bitches is my sons practically invented the term "applications". Our feature set is second to none, but our B2C subscriber communities and non-complex use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Your budget for benchmarking should be at least one-third of your budget for reintermediating. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy use. Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be C2B2B? We always expedite collaborative accounting. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiscal year's financial state of things! We have proven we know that if you brand vertically then you may also visualize wirelessly. The metrics for co-branded, compelling compliance are more well-understood if they are not clicks-and-mortar. Quick: do you have a one-to-one plan for managing emerging synergies? We will iterate the capacity of user-centric, extensible, vertical aggregation to cultivate. Have you ever needed to seize your feature set? With one click? We realize that it is better to empower efficiently than to cultivate ultra-proactively. We will scale the industry jargon "compelling". Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and HTML. Quick: do you have a cross-platform game plan for handling unplanned-for intra-customized, user-centric, out-of-the-box research and development metrics? If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex operation. We will revalue our capability to deploy without decreasing our capability to revolutionize. Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be collaborative? Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be viral?