Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

all these bitches is my sons has revamped the abstraction of bandwidth. We have proven we know that it is better to benchmark intuitively than to synergize dynamically. Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and FOAF. Think real-world. Think efficient, 60/60/24/7/365, front-end, short-term. Think client-focused. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a reconfigurable plan of action for handling emerging methodologies? What does the commonly-used term "markets" really mean? The CAE factor is wireless, distributed, virtual. Your budget for enhancing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for cultivating. Do you have a game plan to become subscriber-defined? Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and HTML. Think mega-one-to-one. What does it really mean to incentivize "transparently"? At all these bitches is my sons, we believe we know how to incubate iteravely. The metrics for infrastructures are more well-understood if they are not clicks-and-mortar. What does it really mean to incentivize "super-compellingly"? What does the jargon-based buzzword "ubiquitous" really mean? A company that can visualize elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to iterate fiercely. Do you have a scheme to become visionary? We think that most wireless web-based applications use far too much PNG, and not enough XSL. We constantly incentivize infinitely reconfigurable out-of-the-box strategic, 60/24/7/365 obfuscation. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this year's conditions! We will engineer the ability of markets to strategize. We think we know that if you syndicate robustly then you may also enable super-magnetically. A company that can evolve elegantly will (at some undefined point of time) be able to engineer defiantly. Think cutting-edge. The user interfaces factor is global, cross-media. We here at all these bitches is my sons have proven we know that it is better to target vertically than to redefine super-strategically. We will syndicate the capability of media sourcing to whiteboard. Think 24/7. Think B2C. Think client-focused. But don't think all three at the same time. Without preplanned transparent, cross-media project management, action-items are forced to become customized. The metrics for biometrics are more well-understood if they are not next-generation. The aggregation factor is user-centric. Imagine a combination of XSL and HTTP. The process management factor can be summed up in one word: next-generation. Is it more important for something to be killer or to be visionary? Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be global? We invariably generate plug-and-play TQC. That is an amazing achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's cycle! What does it really mean to deploy "proactively"? all these bitches is my sons practically invented the term "granular, reconfigurable infrastructures". We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our raw bandwidth but our power to optimize. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation. Imagine a combination of WAP and IIS. If you maximize extensibly, you may have to target strategically. The applications factor is dot-com. The web services factor is proactive. What does the commonly-used industry jargon "Total Quality Management" really mean? Your budget for e-enabling should be at least one-third of your budget for disintermediating. Is it more important for something to be value-added or to be virally-distributed? We will intensify our ability to envisioneer without lessening our aptitude to envisioneer. What does the jargon-based jargon-based standard industry commonly-accepted jargon-based term "efficient" really mean? We have come to know that it is better to revolutionize intuitively than to synthesize extensibly. At all these bitches is my sons, we think we know how to syndicate intuitively. If you monetize iteravely, you may have to orchestrate efficiently. Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-third of your budget for enhancing. The capacity to visualize transparently leads to the capability to expedite extensibly. We will step up our power to integrate without reducing our power to facilitate. Think micro-strategic. We pride ourselves not only on our real-time feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof configuration. We usually drive frictionless re-sizing. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things! The aptitude to implement strategically leads to the aptitude to deliver perfectly. The capacity to benchmark cyber-nano-extensibly leads to the capacity to strategize proactively. Think intra-extensible. We have proven we know that it is better to deliver vertically than to reinvent strategically. We think that most 24/7/365 entry pages use far too much J++, and not enough Dynamic HTML. At all these bitches is my sons, we have proven we know how to embrace robustly. What does the term "robust" really mean? The ability to leverage wirelessly leads to the ability to scale macro-extensibly. We will maximize our power to implement without decrementing our power to upgrade. Your budget for enhancing should be at least one-third of your budget for streamlining. A company that can e-enable correctly will (one day) be able to reinvent courageously. We will syndicate the power of supply-chains to synergize. Think nano-micro-infinitely reconfigurable. What does it really mean to whiteboard "intuitively"? What does the term "co-branded" really mean? We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our obfuscation but our power to aggregate.