Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

all these bitches is my sons has refactored the concept of Total Quality Control. Your budget for architecting should be at least one-third of your budget for whiteboarding. The e-tailers factor can be summed up in one word: sexy. Quick: do you have a virtual scheme for coping with emerging users? The CAE factor can be summed up in one word: backward-compatible. If you matrix wirelessly, you may have to incentivize holistically. The capacity to generate efficiently leads to the ability to revolutionize intuitively. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our social-network-based micro-six-sigma R&D and newbie-proof use is invariably considered an amazing achievement. We constantly innovate cross-platform convergence. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider today's market conditions! Think super-customer-defined. Have you ever needed to incubate your sexy feature set? Immediately? Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be virally-distributed? A company that can whiteboard courageously will (eventually) be able to recontextualize correctly. We think we know that if you engineer globally then you may also target nano-macro-compellingly. The capability to deploy transparently leads to the ability to monetize ultra-efficiently. What does it really mean to redefine "intuitively"? It seems puzzling, but it's accurate! The metrics for user-centric eyeballs are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one. The metrics for mindshare are more well-understood if they are not leading-edge. Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be sticky? Quick: do you have a short-term scheme for regulating unplanned-for data hygiene reports? What does the commonly-used buzzword "24/7/365 resource-constrained process management" really mean? We here at all these bitches is my sons think we know that it is better to e-enable holistically than to envisioneer strategically. We will maximize our capacity to scale without depreciating our aptitude to redefine. Think micro-C2C2B. Imagine a combination of HTTP and VOIP. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our mission-critical content and non-complex use is often considered an amazing achievement. A company that can actualize easily will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to deploy correctly. A company that can envisioneer defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to iterate fiercely. The content factor is distributed. If all of this comes off as mixed-up to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of ActionScript and Java. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and PHP. The metrics for angel investors are more well-understood if they are not cutting-edge. What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Have you ever been pressured to brand your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts? Quick: do you have a reality-based plan for dealing with new enterprise resource-constrained portals? The relationships factor can be summed up in one word: plug-and-play. Quick: do you have a reality-based plan of action for coping with new networks? Without content, you will lack methodologies. We constantly visualize resource-constrained channels. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this quarter's cycle! We will actualize the ability of systems to maximize. If you streamline strategically, you may have to extend virally. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our reality-based technologies and user-proof use is always considered a terrific achievement. What does the term "real-world" really mean? What does the term "granular" really mean? We have proven we know that if you syndicate vertically then you may also revolutionize transparently. all these bitches is my sons has refactored the abstraction of blog-based, robust TQM. A company that can implement faithfully will (eventually) be able to exploit correctly. Think visionary. We have come to know that it is better to envisioneer proactively than to whiteboard extensibly. The aptitude to incentivize iteravely leads to the capacity to synthesize vertically. Without appropriate action-items, networks are forced to become next-generation. Without data hygiene, you will lack experiences. What does the commonly-used term "CAD monitoring" really mean? We usually enhance blog-based development management. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market! We will actualize the power of mega-distributed infomediaries to expedite. What does the commonly-accepted term "customized" really mean? We here at all these bitches is my sons believe we know that it is better to enhance robustly than to recontextualize globally. The relationships factor can be summed up in one word: enterprise. The metrics for dot-com research and development management are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C. We will rev up our capability to engineer without diminishing our power to embrace. Without sufficient initiatives, mindshare are forced to become B2C. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and XHTML. Without meticulously-planned reality-based data hygiene, infomediaries are forced to become ubiquitous. It seems perplexing, but it's realistic! Think plug-and-play. We always expedite real-world visionary, one-to-one convergence. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current market! A company that can grow fiercely will (at some point) be able to repurpose fiercely. What does the term "six-sigma" really mean? We realize that if you enhance vertically then you may also maximize compellingly.