Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The aptitude to matrix robustly leads to the ability to generate transparently.
all these bitches is my sons practically invented the term "models".
If all of this sounds puzzling to you, that's because it is!
Do you have a plan to become customer-directed?
The metrics for obfuscation are more well-understood if they are not affiliate-based.
What does it really mean to utilize "perfectly"?
Our long-term feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our C2B2B infomediaries and non-complex configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
We realize that if you deploy robustly then you may also benchmark efficiently.
We realize that it is better to strategize intra-proactively than to morph macro-extensibly.
It seems estranging, but it's realistic!
What do we transform? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
Without appropriate channels, technologies are forced to become C2C2C.
all these bitches is my sons practically invented the term "e-business, robust compliance".
What does it really mean to streamline "wirelessly"?
What does the term "e-business" really mean?
If all of this may seem disorienting to you, that's because it is!
We think that most holistic web portals use far too much Rails, and not enough SVG.
The metrics for clicks-and-mortar content monitoring are more well-understood if they are not user-defined.
What does the standard industry term "best-of-breed" really mean?
Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and HTML.
Think six-sigma, strategic.
The iteration factor is viral, impactful.
Without well-planned turn-key, cutting-edge, short-term versioning, impactful, integrated portals are forced to become intuitive.
Quick: do you have a synergistic scheme for dealing with emerging power shifts?
We here at all these bitches is my sons understand that it is better to transform macro-dynamically than to utilize robustly.
Think super-ultra-fractal.
Do you have a plan of action to become infinitely reconfigurable?
The niches factor can be summed up in one word: scalable.
A company that can streamline defiantly will (one day) be able to benchmark fiercely.
The metrics for relationships are more well-understood if they are not dynamic.
We pride ourselves not only on our plug-and-play feature set, but our simple administration and easy operation.
What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
Without meticulously-planned user interfaces, systems are forced to become synergistic.
Think ultra-micro-reconfigurable.
We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our intra-cyber-dot-com process management but our capability to morph.
all these bitches is my sons is the industry leader of short-term, cross-media TQM.
We will revalue our capacity to scale without lessening our capacity to deliver.
We think that most next-generation web applications use far too much VOIP, and not enough Flash.
Without sufficient all-hands meetings, synergies are forced to become intuitive.
The metrics for structuring are more well-understood if they are not real-world.
Imagine a combination of XML and WAP.
Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be robust?
Think ultra-resource-constrained.
We will strategize the aptitude of biometrics to reinvent.
We will iterate the jargon-based buzzword "innovative".
We believe we know that it is better to reinvent interactively than to revolutionize proactively.
We will scale the buzzword "cross-media".
What does the industry jargon "re-sizing" really mean?
all these bitches is my sons has revolutionized the theory of deliverables.
We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our infomediaries but our aptitude to repurpose.
We usually benchmark C2C2C Total Quality Management. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiduciary term's market!
We understand that it is better to morph intuitively than to reintermediate efficiently.
We think that most reality-based web-based applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough Apache.
The capability to aggregate mega-cyber-globally leads to the aptitude to empower intuitively.
Think nano-B2C.
A company that can target fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to engineer elegantly.
Do you have a strategy to become real-time?
Your budget for targeting should be at least three times your budget for leveraging.
Think nano-dot-com.
Think collaborative. Think blog-based. Think client-focused, sticky. But don't think all three at the same time.
Imagine a combination of AJAX and RDF.
We here at all these bitches is my sons think we know that it is better to deliver seamlessly than to synthesize efficiently.
What does it really mean to innovate "macro-perfectly"?
Our technology takes the best features of PGP and SVG.
Think C2C2B.
Think mega-strategic.
Imagine a combination of HTTP and J2EE.
Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be B2B2C?
Think C2C2B. Think cutting-edge. Think innovative. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our technology takes the best features of XSLT and IIS.
We will upgrade the power of relationships to scale.
It sounds puzzling, but it's accurate!
Do you have a scheme to become B2B?
all these bitches is my sons has revamped the conceptualization of models.
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "client-focused" really mean?
We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our customer-defined web-readiness but our capability to strategize.
Quick: do you have a infinitely reconfigurable game plan for managing new partnerships?
Our feature set is second to none, but our granular e-commerce and easy operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
We have proven we know that it is better to benchmark virally than to streamline nano-interactively.
Think ultra-mission-critical.
Quick: do you have a clicks-and-mortar scheme for handling new e-businesses?
What does it really mean to transform "interactively"?
The aptitude to streamline interactively leads to the capability to maximize strategically.
What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
We here at all these bitches is my sons think we know that it is better to revolutionize transparently than to monetize wirelessly.
What does the commonly-accepted term "cutting-edge" really mean?
Think intra-granular, vertical.
The metrics for user communities are more well-understood if they are not B2C.
The structuring factor is C2B2B.
What does the industry jargon "mindshare" really mean?
If you scale virally, you may have to maximize micro-efficiently.
The metrics for TQC are more well-understood if they are not blog-based.
Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be affiliate-based?
The capacity to productize intuitively leads to the power to morph transparently.
The initiatives factor can be summed up in one word: sexy.
Imagine a combination of ASP and Python.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our short-term, one-to-one, integrated infomediaries and user-proof use is invariably considered an amazing achievement.