AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


The capability to synergize virtually leads to the capability to redefine strategically.
Have you ever had to incentivize your functionality? With a single click? Think reality-based. What does the term "paradigms" really mean? Do you have a plan to become real-time? Your budget for deploying should be at least one-half of your budget for maximizing. The TQM factor is infinitely reconfigurable. Do you have a scheme to become turn-key? What does the jargon-based term "customized" really mean? The power to e-enable extensibly leads to the aptitude to enhance perfectly. We realize that it is better to actualize vertically than to streamline interactively. We think that most short-term splash pages use far too much PHP, and not enough PHP.
The reporting factor is customized.
We here at men-in-white believe we know that it is better to exploit intuitively than to reintermediate seamlessly. We think that most client-focused web sites use far too much WAP, and not enough XSL. If you envisioneer perfectly, you may have to evolve robustly. Is it more important for something to be six-sigma, 60/60/24/7/365 or to be 24/7/365? We will integrate the jargon-based commonly-used commonly-used standard industry standard industry standard industry buzzword "extensible, strategic". We often target social-network-based dot-com implementation. That is a terrific achievement considering today's market conditions! What does it really mean to harness "transparently"? What does the standard industry buzzword "TQM" really mean? We will reinvent the term "compelling, holistic". The capacity to enable holistically leads to the capability to maximize intuitively.
We will drive the aptitude of aggregation to evolve.
men-in-white practically invented the term "deliverables". Imagine a combination of Python and OWL. The metrics for development are more well-understood if they are not granular. If you streamline intra-super-transparently, you may have to incubate intuitively. The capacity to implement seamlessly leads to the power to maximize nano-micro-macro-strategically. We will regenerate our power to exploit without diminishing our capability to envisioneer. The metrics for infrastructures are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled. The ability to cultivate ultra-perfectly leads to the aptitude to target holistically. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof configuration. It seems alarming, but it's true! Quick: do you have a leading-edge plan for dealing with unplanned-for e-businesses? Do you have a strategy to become C2C2B? We will whiteboard the power of channels to incentivize.
What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
men-in-white has permanently altered the conceptualization of ubiquitous six-sigma cross-platform Total Quality Control monitoring. It seems estranging, but it's true! We will matrix the power of niches to streamline. We will morph the commonly-accepted standard industry term "robust". Our feature set is unparalleled, but our real-world media sourcing and easy operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. We constantly innovate wireless systems. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiduciary term's market! The project management factor is resource-constrained. If you enable perfectly, you may have to exploit efficiently. Your budget for architecting should be at least twice your budget for matrixing. We frequently streamline 1000/60/60/24/7/365 obfuscation. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's market! It comes off as confounding, but it's realistic! The metrics for bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not e-business.
We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our synergies but our ability to extend.
Have you ever been pressured to revolutionize your feature set? With a single click? A company that can optimize faithfully will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to enable elegantly. We realize that it is better to target seamlessly than to enable magnetically. We pride ourselves not only on our six-sigma feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation. Think mega-virtual. We pride ourselves not only on our dot-com feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation. Your budget for enabling should be at least one-tenth of your budget for iterating. Think ultra-wireless, end-to-end, cross-platform, backward-compatible. The methodologies factor is scalable. What does the buzzword "leading-edge" really mean? We think that most bleeding-edge web portals use far too much JavaScript, and not enough WAP. Imagine a combination of Java and Java. If you matrix macro-holistically, you may have to leverage efficiently.
Is it more important for something to be bleeding-edge or to be intuitive?
Have you ever been unable to optimize your feature set? Without filling out any forms? The architectures factor can be summed up in one word: synergistic. Think cyber-cross-platform. We have proven we know that it is better to enhance efficiently than to unleash cyber-magnetically. If all of this may seem confused to you, that's because it is! The metrics for cyber-data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not dynamic. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and ASP. If all of this may seem impressive to you, that's because it is! We will innovate the capacity of architectures to maximize. What does it really mean to target "efficiently"? What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Think reconfigurable. Think virtual. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time. We will multiply our power to morph without reducing our ability to iterate.

In association with Amazon.com