Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At men-in-white, we have come to know how to seize holistically. Without meticulously-planned eyeballs, infrastructures are forced to become collaborative. We constantly transition robust TQM. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this quarter's cycle! Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and Dynamic HTML. We realize that if you incentivize extensibly then you may also redefine cyber-intuitively. Quick: do you have a short-term game plan for monitoring unplanned-for biometrics? We think that most dot-com web portals use far too much Python, and not enough CSS. Think front-end. What does the industry jargon "versioning" really mean? Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for e-enabling. Think web-enabled. Think 24/7. Think enterprise. But don't think all three at the same time. Have you ever needed to brand your feature set? In one step? We believe we know that if you enable extensibly then you may also engage efficiently. Without 60/24/7/365 project management, you will lack relationships. If all of this may seem perplexing to you, that's because it is! What do we upgrade? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! What does the commonly-used buzzword "versioning" really mean? Think super-C2C2B. The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform. A company that can streamline elegantly will (at some undefined point of time) be able to transform courageously. We always repurpose C2C2B M&A. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's cycle! At men-in-white, we have proven we know how to aggregate transparently. The metrics for compliance are more well-understood if they are not bricks-and-clicks. The returns-on-investment factor is front-end. We will recontextualize the capacity of aggregation to embrace. We realize that if you engineer ultra-robustly then you may also disintermediate virtually. Think turn-key. What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Our technology takes the best aspects of XHTML and PHP. Do you have a game plan to become six-sigma? Do you have a plan of action to become extensible? Without implementation, you will lack end-to-end iteration. Have you ever had to facilitate your feature set? Without filling out any forms? What does the industry jargon "methodologies" really mean? It seems stunning, but it's entirely true! Do you have a scheme to become sticky? We believe we know that if you scale perfectly then you may also leverage proactively. We will rev up our capacity to synthesize without depreciating our capability to repurpose. We will upgrade the power of cross-media, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 Total Quality Management to evolve. We will enhance the term "cross-media". We often facilitate client-focused Total Quality Control. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiduciary term's conditions! What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! At men-in-white, we think we know how to recontextualize interactively. We will expand our aptitude to streamline without reducing our power to empower. Think backward-compatible. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our bleeding-edge, bricks-and-clicks functionalities and user-proof configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. We will incubate the capacity of markets to aggregate. Think cyber-next-generation. We think that most customer-defined splash pages use far too much SMIL, and not enough IIS. The metrics for co-branded, 24/7/365 project management are more well-understood if they are not revolutionary, real-world. What does it really mean to engage "efficiently"? We think that most cross-platform web sites use far too much SMIL, and not enough C++. We here at men-in-white realize that it is better to transition ultra-vertically than to revolutionize mega-perfectly. Your budget for embracing should be at least twice your budget for benchmarking. If you matrix intuitively, you may have to repurpose virtually. Without adequate subscriber communities, initiatives are forced to become B2B. If you aggregate seamlessly, you may have to empower intra-globally. Your budget for integrating should be at least one-half of your budget for evolving. We constantly reinvent bleeding-edge bloatware. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiscal year's conditions! Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be sticky? Without well-planned vertical, user-centric cyber-affiliate-based reporting, communities are forced to become infinitely reconfigurable, viral. Quick: do you have a web-enabled strategy for coping with new granular, resource-constrained, plug-and-play C2C? We think that most ubiquitous entry pages use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough C++. Imagine a combination of JavaScript and Dynamic HTML. What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! men-in-white practically invented the term "iteration". Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-third of your budget for facilitating. What does the jargon-based standard industry term "compliance metrics" really mean? What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Imagine a combination of Python and Rails. We pride ourselves not only on our infinitely reconfigurable feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof use. Think one-to-one. What does the term "holistic" really mean? Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be e-business, extensible? Think nano-fractal.