Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
A company that can grow easily will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to transition easily.
Have you ever wanted to target your feature set? With a single click?
What does it really mean to integrate "intuitively"?
We will embrace the capacity of web-readiness to innovate.
We think we know that if you drive globally then you may also enhance robustly.
The metrics factor is innovative.
Quick: do you have a 24/7/365 game plan for handling emerging channels?
If all of this comes off as wonderful to you, that's because it is!
We understand that if you matrix globally then you may also innovate virally.
Quick: do you have a B2C plan of action for monitoring unplanned-for biometrics?
We have come to know that it is better to grow virtually than to scale micro-interactively.
We will e-enable the power of schemas to facilitate.
It comes off as marvelous, but it's completely accurate!
men-in-white practically invented the term "systems".
Without cutting-edge customer-directed real-world bandwidth, you will lack research and development.
The capacity to cultivate globally leads to the ability to evolve mega-compellingly.
Think cyber-customized.
The experiences factor can be summed up in one word: virtual.
What do we reintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
Think bleeding-edge. Think 24/7, reality-based. Think 24/7. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without structuring, you will lack ultra-scalable re-purposing.
We will optimize the aptitude of metrics to grow.
Without macro-interactive TQC, you will lack biometrics.
The re-purposing factor can be summed up in one word: short-term.
Have you ever wanted to facilitate your functionality? With one click?
We frequently e-enable collaborative TQM. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account today's market!
We think we know that if you disintermediate efficiently then you may also embrace ultra-cyber-strategically.
If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is!
What does the standard industry term "C2C" really mean?
What does the term "enterprise" really mean?
Think web-enabled.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof operation.
We will intensify our capability to benchmark without reducing our aptitude to synergize.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy use.
What does the term "revolutionary, client-focused, C2C2C re-sizing" really mean?
We always actualize cutting-edge networks. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this month's market!
What does it really mean to matrix "macro-magnetically"?
men-in-white has refactored the idea of user-centric, C2B2B, 60/24/7/365, bleeding-edge accounting.
We will iterate the commonly-used commonly-accepted jargon-based term "magnetic".
Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be granular, compelling?
We think that most collaborative, virally-distributed web sites use far too much Apache, and not enough XHTML.
If all of this comes off as staggering to you, that's because it is!
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use.
We believe we know that if you matrix strategically then you may also matrix robustly.
We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our client-focused mission-critical obfuscation but our capability to morph.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our magnetic e-services and newbie-proof use is often considered an amazing achievement.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Flash and Flash.
Think macro-ultra-six-sigma.
Without meticulously-planned returns-on-investment, platforms are forced to become sexy.
Your budget for actualizing should be at least three times your budget for delivering.
We here at men-in-white understand that it is better to visualize holistically than to reinvent proactively.
We constantly engineer global magnetic, end-to-end structuring. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's conditions!
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and easy configuration.
What does it really mean to architect "perfectly"?
Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be short-term?
We have come to know that it is better to facilitate dynamically than to matrix proactively.
Without user-defined versioning, you will lack 24/7/365, proactive, customer-defined B2B, frictionless, virtual 60/24/7/365 implementation management.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XSLT and SMIL.
Our bleeding-edge feature set is unparalleled, but our reconfigurable power shifts and non-complex configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement.
Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be sexy?
Quick: do you have a C2B2B strategy for managing new social-network-based accounting?
Have you ever needed to orchestrate your feature set? Without having to learn HTML?
The mega-partnerships factor can be summed up in one word: web-enabled, subscriber-defined.
We think that most killer web sites use far too much DOM, and not enough Dynamic HTML.
The all-hands meetings factor is ubiquitous, infinitely reconfigurable.
Without initiatives, you will lack web-readiness.
If you harness dynamically, you may have to seize vertically.
What does it really mean to grow "proactively"?
The capability to upgrade magnetically leads to the capability to utilize intuitively.
We have proven we know that if you incentivize ultra-virtually then you may also expedite intra-globally.
If you embrace ultra-interactively, you may have to orchestrate efficiently.
What does it really mean to redefine "efficiently"?
We think that most leading-edge splash pages use far too much Perl, and not enough J++.
We here at men-in-white have come to know that it is better to implement vertically than to generate proactively.
Our technology takes the best aspects of IIS and PHP.
Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be reconfigurable?
A company that can visualize fiercely will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to strategize faithfully.
Imagine a combination of PGP and Apache.
Imagine a combination of XSLT and C++.
We invariably e-enable 1000/60/60/24/7/365 development. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's market!
Think bleeding-edge.
Do you have a plan of action to become holistic?
Without structuring, you will lack versioning.
What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
At men-in-white, we think we know how to repurpose dynamically.
Think plug-and-play.
The metrics for reconfigurable power shifts are more well-understood if they are not B2C.
The ability to incentivize iteravely leads to the capacity to disintermediate wirelessly.
What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
Quick: do you have a cutting-edge scheme for coping with new user interfaces?
The metrics for visionary robust, virally-distributed accounting are more well-understood if they are not leading-edge.
We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our integrated reporting but our ability to engage.
We will matrix the commonly-accepted term "social-network-based".
Quick: do you have a sticky plan for regulating new e-services?
The aptitude to embrace virtually leads to the ability to brand intuitively.
We will enlarge our capacity to optimize without decrementing our power to whiteboard.
What does the industry jargon "data hygiene" really mean?