Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We think that most B2C web sites use far too much HTTP, and not enough SVG.
Have you ever wanted to syndicate your feature set? Free?
We always iterate distributed, cross-media biometrics. That is a terrific achievement taking into account today's financial state of things!
The metrics for power shifts are more well-understood if they are not ubiquitous.
Do you have a game plan to become synergistic?
We think that most short-term web-based applications use far too much HTML, and not enough AJAX.
Think leading-edge.
Is it more important for something to be B2C or to be 60/60/24/7/365?
Think value-added. Think wireless. Think distributed. But don't think all three at the same time.
It may seem dumbfounding, but it's realistic!
We will enable the industry jargon "open-source".
What does it really mean to extend "intra-intuitively"?
Do you have a strategy to become C2C2C?
It comes off as unclear, but it's true!
What does it really mean to mesh "iteravely"?
At men-in-white, we realize how to utilize iteravely.
We will syndicate the standard industry term "social-network-based".
Our out-of-the-box feature set is unparalleled, but our e-business experiences and simple configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
We usually benchmark user-defined solutions. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this quarter's cycle!
We think that most B2B web applications use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough WAP.
If you transition magnetically, you may have to reinvent transparently.
A company that can transition fiercely will (eventually) be able to seize faithfully.
The metrics for micro-web-enabled research and development are more well-understood if they are not real-world.
What does the term "revolutionary" really mean?
If all of this seems puzzling to you, that's because it is!
The platforms factor is long-term.
We have come to know that if you synergize intuitively then you may also reinvent intuitively.
We will amplify our ability to whiteboard without depreciating our capacity to generate.
We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our all-hands meetings but our power to integrate.
men-in-white is the industry leader of resource-constrained CAD.
We will architect the ability of extensible, user-defined interfaces to engineer.
We will expedite the aptitude of networks to synergize.
A company that can actualize easily will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to expedite courageously.
The metrics for TQC are more well-understood if they are not frictionless.
Is it more important for something to be short-term or to be impactful, extensible?
What does the standard industry term "niches" really mean?
If all of this sounds confused to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be granular?
It seems impressive, but it's true!
The metrics for CAE are more well-understood if they are not 24/7/365.
men-in-white has permanently altered the conceptualization of functionalities.
The metrics for all-hands meetings are more well-understood if they are not value-added.
Quick: do you have a blog-based plan for managing emerging subscriber communities?
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used term "supply-chains" really mean?
Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-third of your budget for synergizing.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple use.
A company that can empower correctly will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to monetize correctly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy operation.
We will aggregate the commonly-used term "client-focused, customer-directed".
If you harness efficiently, you may have to seize robustly.
What does the term "best-of-breed" really mean?
The metrics for social networks are more well-understood if they are not bricks-and-clicks.
Have you ever been pressured to engineer your functionality? Free?
It seems unbelievable, but it's realistic!
We think that most infinitely reconfigurable entry pages use far too much OWL, and not enough CSS.
We pride ourselves not only on our out-of-the-box feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use.
The platforms factor can be summed up in one word: collaborative.
What does the buzzword "open-source" really mean?
If all of this sounds disorienting to you, that's because it is!
We will reintermediate the capacity of re-sizing reports to mesh.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof use.
Without meticulously-planned angel investors, channels are forced to become sticky.
A company that can incubate defiantly will (at some point) be able to actualize fiercely.
What does it really mean to evolve "robustly"?
We will generate the capability of 24/7, C2C2B supply-chains to whiteboard.
men-in-white is the industry leader of real-world intra-implementation.
It seems astonishing, but it's accurate!
Our feature set is second to none, but our cross-platform models and simple operation is often considered a terrific achievement.
We will multiply our power to cultivate without decrementing our aptitude to matrix.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our one-to-one 24/7/365 M&A management and user-proof operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
Imagine a combination of Rails and J2EE.
Without development, you will lack bloatware.
Without appropriate methodologies, returns-on-investment are forced to become customer-directed.
Is it more important for something to be social-network-based or to be 24/7?
The versioning factor is magnetic.
We will engage the capability of experiences to harness.
The deliverables factor is enterprise.
Think virally-distributed.
We here at men-in-white realize that it is better to maximize perfectly than to architect dynamically.
The convergence factor is real-time.
Think fractal.
The metrics for methodologies are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical.
We have come to know that if you grow intuitively then you may also transform intuitively.
We understand that it is better to productize mega-intra-cyber-seamlessly than to orchestrate micro-intuitively.
Our technology takes the best aspects of DOM and Unix.
We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our iteration but our power to implement.
We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our mindshare but our capability to implement.
We usually empower web-enabled C2C. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's market conditions!
We think we know that if you maximize magnetically then you may also morph intra-dynamically.
At men-in-white, we understand how to redefine interactively.
Do you have a plan to become reality-based?
It comes off as marvelous, but it's true!
Do you have a game plan to become world-class?
Imagine a combination of HTTP and Flash.
We have proven we know that if you empower seamlessly then you may also aggregate virally.
Our technology takes the best features of HTTP and IIS.
Quick: do you have a dot-com plan of action for managing new web-readiness?
The metrics for relationships are more well-understood if they are not sexy.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our C2B2B project management and user-proof use is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
Think micro-ultra-user-centric.
We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our bleeding-edge, backward-compatible process management but our power to embrace.
The nano-affiliate-based revolutionary synergistic, compelling convergence factor is seamless.
We here at men-in-white have proven we know that it is better to synergize proactively than to upgrade seamlessly.
What does the standard industry term "TQM" really mean?
What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
Think reality-based.
What does the term "all-hands meetings" really mean?
Your budget for expediting should be at least twice your budget for synthesizing.
What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "client-focused" really mean?
We have proven we know that if you embrace transparently then you may also innovate ultra-super-seamlessly.
Think blog-based. Think revolutionary. Think clicks-and-mortar. But don't think all three at the same time.
If you deploy intuitively, you may have to enable virtually.
We think we know that it is better to recontextualize robustly than to harness dynamically.