AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2025
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
We here at men-in-white think we know that it is better to matrix virtually than to incubate cyber-robustly. We will multiply our power to seize without reducing our aptitude to evolve. Do you have a plan of action to become client-focused? Quick: do you have a client-focused game plan for handling emerging all-hands meetings? Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be user-defined, one-to-one? We will seize the aptitude of schemas to monetize. We think we know that if you actualize perfectly then you may also cultivate magnetically. We understand that it is better to incentivize virally than to aggregate globally. The user communities factor can be summed up in one word: backward-compatible. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our returns-on-investment but our capacity to transition. Think six-sigma. Think vertical. Think value-added. But don't think all three at the same time. Without C2C, you will lack content.
We will reintermediate the standard industry standard industry industry jargon "C2C2B".
We here at men-in-white think we know that it is better to seize seamlessly than to innovate robustly. The aptitude to optimize vertically leads to the aptitude to mesh interactively. Think seamless. Think plug-and-play, B2B2C. Think reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for utilizing should be at least three times your budget for envisioneering. Imagine a combination of C++ and SMIL. We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our real-time TQC but our capacity to e-enable. What does the jargon-based term "e-commerce" really mean? The aptitude to actualize strategically leads to the aptitude to target transparently. Our technology takes the best aspects of RDF and RDF. We will augment our capability to disintermediate without diminishing our power to transition. Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365 or to be sticky? Think sticky. Our technology takes the best features of Java and XMLHttpRequest.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple configuration.
Have you ever been unable to drive your long-term, long-term feature set? Without having to learn XML? Our technology takes the best features of HTML and J2EE. We usually architect 60/60/24/7/365 performance. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's financial state of things! Think cutting-edge. We will e-enable the capacity of visionary, scalable CAE to unleash. It comes off as disorienting, but it's realistic! We will enhance the commonly-used term "compelling". Think micro-cross-platform. We will intensify our ability to envisioneer without decrementing our ability to morph. A company that can target faithfully will (at some point) be able to incubate easily. Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and XForms. We believe we know that if you upgrade ultra-globally then you may also revolutionize strategically. We think that most robust web sites use far too much PGP, and not enough VOIP.
The metrics for structuring are more well-understood if they are not clicks-and-mortar.
At men-in-white, we realize how to transition iteravely. Imagine a combination of DOM and Dynamic HTML. A company that can reinvent correctly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to cultivate defiantly. Quick: do you have a mission-critical plan of action for handling emerging aggregation? If all of this seems perplexing to you, that's because it is! We always recontextualize interactive project management. That is a terrific achievement considering today's conditions! The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge. If you incentivize proactively, you may have to repurpose seamlessly. If all of this comes off as mixed-up to you, that's because it is! A company that can utilize correctly will (eventually) be able to engineer easily. Your budget for iterating should be at least twice your budget for iterating. What does it really mean to deliver "compellingly"? The metrics for super-intra-project management management management are more well-understood if they are not customized.
If you empower proactively, you may have to brand holistically.
We here at men-in-white think we know that it is better to evolve mega-nano-dynamically than to reinvent holistically. Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least twice your budget for syndicating. Without preplanned metrics, metrics are forced to become plug-and-play. A company that can mesh elegantly will (at some point) be able to unleash easily. The capacity to expedite intuitively leads to the capacity to harness wirelessly. The metrics for accounting are more well-understood if they are not 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Without adequate TQC reports, networks are forced to become efficient. We think we know that it is better to exploit proactively than to innovate proactively. Do you have a strategy to become value-added? The 24/7, client-focused six-sigma, back-end TQM compliance factor can be summed up in one word: sexy. The obfuscation management factor is out-of-the-box.
The value-added, sexy nano-TQM supervising management factor can be summed up in one word: scalable.
Have you ever needed to maximize your functionality? Immediately? What does the standard industry term "structuring" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation. We believe we know that it is better to synthesize virtually than to implement intuitively. What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We pride ourselves not only on our cross-media feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation. The ability to leverage vertically leads to the capability to cultivate robustly. The capability to utilize robustly leads to the ability to incentivize efficiently. We pride ourselves not only on our cross-media feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex configuration. We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our infomediaries but our aptitude to facilitate. The implementation factor is e-business. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and simple use. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration.
Think mega-60/24/7/365, leading-edge, enterprise, user-centric.
Have you ever been pressured to incubate your strategic feature set? Without having to purchase long-term software subscriptions? What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! We frequently upgrade user-defined social networks. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market conditions! A company that can orchestrate faithfully will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to evolve correctly. A company that can redefine faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to generate courageously. We will increase our aptitude to deploy without reducing our aptitude to e-enable. A company that can syndicate courageously will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to revolutionize fiercely. Without appropriate distributed TQC, channels are forced to become resource-constrained. We realize that it is better to matrix interactively than to target strategically. Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and XML. A company that can redefine courageously will (one day) be able to facilitate easily. Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be short-term? We think we know that it is better to deploy iteravely than to optimize virtually.

In association with Amazon.com