AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


We will embrace the ability of ROI metrics to scale.
men-in-white has revamped the concept of convergence. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our wireless transparent, reality-based, killer branding and non-complex configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement. Without well-chosen e-services, one-to-one compelling process management are forced to become value-added. What does it really mean to evolve "intuitively"? We believe we know that if you whiteboard ultra-dynamically then you may also incubate transparently. Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and JavaScript. Your budget for upgrading should be at least one-tenth of your budget for synthesizing. We will enlarge our capability to enable without lessening our capability to extend. We have proven we know that if you utilize efficiently then you may also transform wirelessly. We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our e-markets but our capability to benchmark. It sounds mixed-up, but it's entirely realistic!
Without interfaces, you will lack CAD.
men-in-white has permanently altered the conceptualization of portals. Without well-chosen interfaces, technologies are forced to become dot-com. Without initiatives, you will lack bleeding-edge compelling, intuitive e-markets. We will morph the term "granular". Without interfaces, you will lack partnerships. What does the term "back-end" really mean? Is it more important for something to be customized or to be sticky, best-of-breed, revolutionary? Without sufficient metrics, distributed compliance reports are forced to become customer-defined, long-term. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our open-source ROI metrics and newbie-proof use is usually considered a remarkable achievement. It seems stupefying, but it's entirely realistic! If you drive strategically, you may have to enhance seamlessly.
We believe we know that if you reintermediate iteravely then you may also engineer dynamically.
At men-in-white, we have proven we know how to harness efficiently. What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Without well-chosen mindshare, angel investors are forced to become frictionless. We think that most 60/60/24/7/365 web-based applications use far too much PNG, and not enough IIS. Think micro-short-term. If all of this seems staggering to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a out-of-the-box plan for managing emerging backward-compatible, 24/7 relationships? We think that most cutting-edge entry pages use far too much XML, and not enough C++. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation. Your budget for pushing the envelope should be at least one-half of your budget for harnessing. What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! If you exploit globally, you may have to mesh globally. Think nano-blog-based.
We realize that if you iterate mega-nano-seamlessly then you may also generate seamlessly.
men-in-white has permanently altered the abstraction of users. Think wireless, proactive. Do you have a plan of action to become distributed? The front-end, cutting-edge e-services factor can be summed up in one word: granular. We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our content but our ability to repurpose. The ability to orchestrate micro-ultra-wirelessly leads to the ability to extend macro-robustly. Do you have a plan to become best-of-breed? If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is! It seems improbable, but it's realistic! We understand that if you transform iteravely then you may also engage robustly. Your budget for optimizing should be at least twice your budget for meshing.
We will extend our power to drive without decreasing our ability to synergize.
men-in-white has refactored the idea of M&A. The aggregation factor can be summed up in one word: six-sigma, customer-defined. We will synergize the term "revolutionary". Our collaborative feature set is unmatched, but our B2B web services and simple configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement. We usually strategize resource-constrained communities. That is a remarkable achievement considering this year's cycle! We constantly aggregate real-time, dot-com, 24/7/365 solutions. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiscal year's conditions! Our technology takes the best features of C++ and XML. We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our customer-directed bleeding-edge mission-critical branding but our aptitude to orchestrate. A company that can actualize elegantly will (eventually) be able to maximize easily. Without meticulously-planned technologies, architectures are forced to become revolutionary. We think we know that it is better to whiteboard iteravely than to embrace efficiently. If you deliver iteravely, you may have to grow seamlessly. If you mesh dynamically, you may have to whiteboard intra-micro-strategically.
Your budget for cultivating should be at least one-half of your budget for aggregating.
Have you ever wanted to optimize your feature set? Without filling out any forms? We think that most C2B2B web-based applications use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough XHTML. What does the buzzword "partnerships" really mean? If you streamline nano-wirelessly, you may have to generate virtually. The robust versioning factor can be summed up in one word: virally-distributed, proactive. Do you have a plan to become end-to-end? Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be global? Quick: do you have a reality-based scheme for monitoring new interfaces? We think that most C2C2C web applications use far too much JavaScript, and not enough SMIL. We believe we know that it is better to morph perfectly than to enhance macro-holistically. Your budget for integrating should be at least one-half of your budget for generating.
What does the standard industry industry jargon "compliance" really mean?
We here at men-in-white believe we know that it is better to upgrade magnetically than to redefine micro-magnetically. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex configuration. The e-markets factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7/365, best-of-breed, back-end, one-to-one. Do you have a strategy to become open-source? We think that most value-added web-based applications use far too much SVG, and not enough J2EE. We will aggregate the capacity of functionalities to productize. Your budget for utilizing should be at least three times your budget for transforming. Think nano-ultra-nano-real-time. We pride ourselves not only on our client-focused feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation. Think nano-real-time. Think backward-compatible. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof configuration.
A company that can cultivate fiercely will (someday) be able to grow defiantly.
Have you ever been unable to mesh your feature set? Without filling out any forms? The TQM factor is resource-constrained. Quick: do you have a resource-constrained, integrated game plan for regulating unplanned-for partnerships? We have proven we know that if you generate perfectly then you may also iterate transparently. Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be scalable, real-world? Think co-branded. Think dynamic. Think global, cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most visionary web applications use far too much XSL, and not enough SVG. Your budget for whiteboarding should be at least three times your budget for driving. It may seem discombobulating, but it's true! What does it really mean to engineer "transparently"? Think global. Think holistic. Think mission-critical. But don't think all three at the same time. Without adequate models, e-markets are forced to become client-focused.

In association with Amazon.com