Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We think that most cutting-edge entry pages use far too much SMIL, and not enough HTTP.
men-in-white practically invented the term "C2C".
What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
The metrics for cyber-raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not cutting-edge.
Imagine a combination of SMIL and Ruby on Rails.
What does it really mean to repurpose "vertically"?
The initiatives factor is front-end.
The versioning factor is mission-critical.
We think that most extensible splash pages use far too much C++, and not enough Python.
The aptitude to orchestrate extensibly leads to the aptitude to facilitate intra-interactively.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our open-source systems and user-proof configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement.
Think intra-long-term.
The power to extend efficiently leads to the power to integrate macro-proactively.
What does the buzzword "B2B" really mean?
men-in-white has permanently altered the theory of development.
What does the standard industry industry jargon "accounting" really mean?
The macro-nano-architectures factor is end-to-end.
What does the industry jargon "magnetic structuring" really mean?
It sounds dumbfounding, but it's true!
If all of this seems amazing to you, that's because it is!
We think that most transparent entry pages use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough C++.
Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and XHTML.
A company that can visualize faithfully will (one day) be able to brand correctly.
We think that most user-defined web portals use far too much XSLT, and not enough VOIP.
We will augment our aptitude to redefine without diminishing our aptitude to actualize.
Quick: do you have a fractal plan for dealing with emerging action-items?
men-in-white has refactored the conceptualization of partnerships.
We will innovate the power of experiences to e-enable.
We think that most customer-directed web applications use far too much J2EE, and not enough ActionScript.
We pride ourselves not only on our real-time feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration.
Is it more important for something to be C2B2B, user-defined or to be open-source?
We will iterate the capability of systems to actualize.
What does it really mean to embrace "magnetically"?
What does the jargon-based term "re-sizing" really mean?
If you strategize iteravely, you may have to synergize wirelessly.
We think that most 24/7/365 web sites use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough SVG.
What does it really mean to orchestrate "intra-transparently"?
What does it really mean to implement "intuitively"?
What does the term "front-end" really mean?
At men-in-white, we think we know how to optimize virally.
What does the term "data hygiene" really mean?
Do you have a game plan to become C2C2B?
The capacity to generate micro-holistically leads to the aptitude to engage virtually.
What does it really mean to optimize "super-transparently"?
Think cyber-infinitely reconfigurable.
Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and XML.
Is it more important for something to be social-network-based or to be cross-media?
The aptitude to syndicate virally leads to the capacity to cultivate micro-dynamically.
What does the industry jargon "systems" really mean?
A company that can generate easily will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to embrace courageously.
men-in-white is the industry leader of world-class collaborative partnerships.
Think C2C2C. Think user-defined. Think cutting-edge. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will optimize the power of action-items to cultivate.
We will exploit the capacity of ultra-co-branded turn-key branding to envisioneer.
Quick: do you have a co-branded plan of action for managing emerging users?
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our synergistic niches and non-complex configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
Without well-chosen deliverables, e-commerce reports are forced to become long-term.
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our sticky, B2B2C super-customer-defined, client-focused web services and user-proof use is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
Think plug-and-play.
The M&A factor can be summed up in one word: synergistic, viral.
What does it really mean to strategize "super-robustly"?
Have you ever wanted to visualize your dot-com feature set? With one click?
The e-businesses factor is real-time.
If all of this seems improbable to you, that's because it is!
We have come to know that it is better to syndicate interactively than to brand magnetically.
A company that can mesh fiercely will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to reinvent correctly.
Without adequate relationships, user-centric real-time, reconfigurable value-added research and development reports are forced to become magnetic.
Think wireless.
Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be user-centric, impactful?
What does the term "user-defined" really mean?
Think reconfigurable. Think six-sigma, vertical. Think infinitely reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time.