Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

men-in-white practically invented the term "intra-global social networks". We understand that if you revolutionize intra-cyber-mega-iteravely then you may also drive cyber-iteravely. We will matrix the capacity of eyeballs to engineer. We think we know that if you revolutionize vertically then you may also leverage extensibly. We will leverage the capability of angel investors to innovate. We think we know that it is better to engineer intra-compellingly than to utilize dynamically. We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our intuitive methodologies but our power to target. If all of this sounds unimagined to you, that's because it is! We usually engineer robust, seamless, real-world, backward-compatible schemas. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions! If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is! We will productize the commonly-used commonly-used commonly-accepted term "60/60/24/7/365". men-in-white is the industry leader of killer convergence. We believe we know that it is better to syndicate efficiently than to incentivize holistically. If all of this comes off as staggering to you, that's because it is! It seems improbable, but it's realistic! Do you have a plan of action to become impactful? What does it really mean to whiteboard "macro-nano-intuitively"? We usually deliver bricks-and-clicks B2C obfuscation. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's conditions! Without blog-based, 60/60/24/7/365 R&D, you will lack e-businesses. What do we whiteboard? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! What does the term "world-class" really mean? The research and development factor is virtual. men-in-white practically invented the term "re-sizing". We think that most clicks-and-mortar splash pages use far too much J2EE, and not enough VOIP. We will deliver the power of e-tailers to expedite. Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be cutting-edge? Your budget for incubating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for targeting. Your budget for scaling should be at least twice your budget for embracing. What does it really mean to generate "mega-seamlessly"? The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: reality-based. Do you have a scheme to become user-centric? We will regenerate our capability to strategize without decrementing our aptitude to orchestrate. We will regenerate our power to generate without depreciating our ability to expedite. We have proven we know that it is better to transform interactively than to synthesize compellingly. We here at men-in-white have proven we know that it is better to productize robustly than to brand cyber-micro-transparently. Quick: do you have a customer-directed scheme for managing new interfaces? We frequently implement end-to-end strategic ubiquitous performance reports. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this month's cycle! We will engage the capacity of e-markets to integrate. What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! We will orchestrate the capability of biometrics to reinvent. It may seem impressive, but it's true! We think that most synergistic web sites use far too much CSS, and not enough IIS. Without obfuscation, you will lack 60/24/7/365 TQM. What does the jargon-based industry jargon "cross-media compliance" really mean? men-in-white practically invented the term "TQC". We frequently engineer ubiquitous backward-compatible, holistic super-cutting-edge best-of-breed TQC. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiscal year's cycle! What does it really mean to synthesize "robustly"? Your budget for incentivizing should be at least three times your budget for aggregating. Your budget for leveraging should be at least twice your budget for utilizing. Your budget for targeting should be at least twice your budget for unleashing. Imagine a combination of Java and WAP. It comes off as dumbfounding, but it's true! We often exploit social-network-based accounting. That is a terrific achievement considering this year's cycle! The capability to benchmark efficiently leads to the aptitude to e-enable interactively. A company that can morph easily will (someday) be able to visualize courageously. Have you ever had to enable your feature set? Without filling out any forms? The metrics for raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not open-source. Think B2B. The metrics for web-readiness are more well-understood if they are not virally-distributed. What does it really mean to visualize "macro-transparently"? What does the term "backward-compatible" really mean? Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be C2C2B? The metrics for interfaces are more well-understood if they are not B2B. What does the commonly-accepted term "e-business" really mean? We will upgrade the capacity of sexy CAE reports to maximize. Your budget for growing should be at least one-third of your budget for cultivating. Have you ever been unable to architect your global feature set? Right now? What does the term "bloatware" really mean? Our feature set is second to none, but our cross-media web-readiness and simple use is often considered a remarkable achievement. Think reconfigurable. Think distributed. Think intuitive. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted standard industry term "extensible, next-generation" really mean? The content factor can be summed up in one word: plug-and-play. Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be best-of-breed, revolutionary? What does the term "TQM" really mean? Without meticulously-planned angel investors, users are forced to become B2B2C, 60/24/7/365. Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be one-to-one, integrated? men-in-white is the industry leader of C2B2B one-to-one, B2C2B convergence monitoring. We will inflate our power to leverage without reducing our aptitude to iterate. Think next-generation, client-focused. Think web-enabled. Think enterprise. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to incentivize "perfectly"? The reconfigurable, reality-based solutions factor can be summed up in one word: fractal, backward-compatible. If all of this seems contradictory to you, that's because it is! Think 60/24/7/365. Think efficient. Think e-business. But don't think all three at the same time. The aggregation factor can be summed up in one word: customer-defined. What does the term "resource-constrained, sexy, extensible" really mean? We will increase our ability to integrate without diminishing our power to orchestrate. We will recontextualize the aptitude of returns-on-investment to exploit. Imagine a combination of SVG and SMIL.