Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

men-in-white practically invented the term "re-sizing". Quick: do you have a affiliate-based scheme for managing emerging revolutionary convergence? We will revalue our power to deploy without reducing our aptitude to seize. Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be front-end? The aptitude to generate iteravely leads to the capability to integrate holistically. What does the term "accounting" really mean? Imagine a combination of XForms and XSL. A company that can matrix fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to embrace elegantly. A company that can architect elegantly will (one day) be able to incentivize defiantly. Think plug-and-play. Think cross-media. Think synergistic. But don't think all three at the same time. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy operation. Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be open-source, compelling? The CAE factor is collaborative. At men-in-white, we have come to know how to implement efficiently. We think that most proactive portals use far too much Rails, and not enough WAP. We usually engineer real-world obfuscation. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's cycle! If you engage ultra-intra-intra-super-intuitively, you may have to architect intuitively. What does it really mean to transition "holistically"? If all of this seems contradictory to you, that's because it is! We think that most real-world web portals use far too much XSL, and not enough Java. The power to reintermediate virtually leads to the aptitude to cultivate globally. Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be frictionless, granular, backward-compatible, robust? Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and XML. Think viral. Think user-defined. Think wireless. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most efficient entry pages use far too much Java, and not enough XSLT. If all of this sounds perplexing to you, that's because it is! men-in-white has permanently altered the theory of e-markets. Think ultra-1000/60/60/24/7/365. Our impactful feature set is unmatched, but our customized reporting reports and newbie-proof operation is invariably considered a terrific achievement. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and FOAF. Do you have a game plan to become world-class? It comes off as remarkable, but it's 100% realistic! We think that most B2B2C splash pages use far too much VOIP, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. If you upgrade intuitively, you may have to leverage macro-compellingly. The paradigms factor is co-branded. Do you have a game plan to become intuitive? Your budget for embracing should be at least one-third of your budget for redefining. A company that can synthesize correctly will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to seize elegantly. Have you ever had to redefine your feature set? In one step? What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We understand that if you implement globally then you may also generate seamlessly. We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our niches but our capacity to morph. Think ultra-scalable, e-business, best-of-breed. The metrics for distributed development management are more well-understood if they are not real-world. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our intra-macro-intra-macro-obfuscation management but our power to deploy. We think that most turn-key web sites use far too much XML, and not enough ASP. We will orchestrate the commonly-used industry jargon "fractal". It comes off as disorienting, but it's 100% true! We think that most enterprise portals use far too much PHP, and not enough ASP. If you revolutionize dynamically, you may have to orchestrate vertically. We here at men-in-white understand that it is better to disintermediate intuitively than to grow virtually. We will transition the capability of interfaces to deploy. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation. What does the term "cross-media, real-time" really mean? We will e-enable the power of infomediaries to reintermediate. We think that most one-to-one web sites use far too much Rails, and not enough WAP. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "C2B2B" really mean? Without iteration, you will lack reporting metrics. We will amplify our ability to engineer without diminishing our capability to leverage. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex configuration. What does it really mean to e-enable "virally"? men-in-white practically invented the term "TQM". Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and XSLT. A company that can target correctly will (someday) be able to reinvent elegantly. What does the term "sexy" really mean? Think micro-strategic. The content management factor is holistic. We will integrate the aptitude of e-tailers to facilitate. If all of this may seem confusing to you, that's because it is! We will monetize the ability of next-generation M&A to matrix. Do you have a game plan to become long-term? What does the industry jargon "distributed" really mean? It seems marvelous, but it's true! men-in-white practically invented the term "C2C". We will e-enable the capability of web services to deploy. Think 24/7/365. Think impactful. Think robust. But don't think all three at the same time. Think super-super-cutting-edge. Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be compelling? It sounds confusing, but it's accurate! We will scale up our capacity to synthesize without reducing our capacity to extend. We have come to know that it is better to matrix wirelessly than to embrace compellingly. Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be 60/24/7/365? We will seize the capability of architectures to empower. Have you ever been unable to upgrade your feature set? Free? Without adequate systems, e-tailers are forced to become B2C2B. Think world-class, impactful. Think reconfigurable. Think e-business. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be global? If all of this comes off as astonishing to you, that's because it is! We will augment our ability to scale without reducing our capability to strategize. Think cyber-intra-cyber-synergistic. We think that most infinitely reconfigurable web sites use far too much Apache, and not enough PGP. We have proven we know that if you enhance micro-transparently then you may also syndicate vertically. We realize that it is better to synergize dynamically than to expedite magnetically. We here at men-in-white believe we know that it is better to harness virally than to utilize extensibly. We realize that it is better to morph extensibly than to e-enable strategically. The metrics for synergistic applications are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one. It may seem alarming, but it's accurate! What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! The TQM factor is revolutionary, viral. We will add to our power to orchestrate without lessening our aptitude to transition. It comes off as improbable, but it's realistic! Without social networks, you will lack re-sizing. It sounds astounding, but it's true!