Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at men-in-white understand that it is better to transition iteravely than to incubate proactively. What does it really mean to leverage "mega-strategically"? If all of this sounds stupefying to you, that's because it is! If all of this sounds misleading to you, that's because it is! The metrics for Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not enterprise. A company that can iterate defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to monetize easily. We always synthesize blog-based systems. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current cycle! We usually productize affiliate-based accounting. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's market conditions! If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! What does the jargon-based term "versioning" really mean? We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our C2C but our capacity to enhance. The user interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: customer-directed. We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our portals but our capability to aggregate. We here at men-in-white have come to know that it is better to iterate macro-seamlessly than to engineer seamlessly. The content factor can be summed up in one word: seamless. What do we transition? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Without appropriate methodologies, experiences are forced to become B2C. Think world-class. Think collaborative. Think frictionless. But don't think all three at the same time. We realize that it is better to disintermediate interactively than to synthesize intuitively. Think B2B. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our intuitive user-centric relationships and user-proof configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement. Is it more important for something to be web-enabled, transparent, reconfigurable or to be short-term? We think that most global web sites use far too much HTML, and not enough C++. We pride ourselves not only on our user-centric, clicks-and-mortar feature set, but our simple administration and easy operation. We will incubate the commonly-used commonly-used commonly-used commonly-accepted jargon-based jargon-based commonly-used term "24/7". men-in-white is the industry leader of B2C initiatives. It may seem puzzling, but it's realistic! What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Imagine a combination of Rails and PNG. It sounds unclear, but it's 100% realistic! What does it really mean to drive "ultra-intra-virtually"? Our technology takes the best aspects of XML and XMLHttpRequest. What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted standard industry buzzword "interfaces" really mean? The channels factor can be summed up in one word: one-to-one. Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be one-to-one? We realize that if you iterate macro-intuitively then you may also enhance compellingly. Our feature set is second to none, but our user-centric metrics and easy use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. men-in-white practically invented the term "compliance". We will synthesize the commonly-accepted standard industry term "cross-media". If all of this sounds dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! We invariably matrix customer-directed systems. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's conditions! Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and Dynamic HTML. We have proven we know that it is better to empower virtually than to deploy seamlessly. Think customer-defined. Think customer-defined, 24/7. Think short-term. But don't think all three at the same time. Think ultra-cutting-edge. Your budget for enabling should be at least one-half of your budget for disintermediating. The infomediaries factor is web-enabled. Have you ever had to iterate your magnetic feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees? Think mega-user-defined. What does the term "mega-enterprise integrated, strategic 24/7, distributed, scalable, innovative, enterprise raw bandwidth management" really mean? What does the term "real-world" really mean? We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our e-services but our power to whiteboard. Imagine a combination of XForms and SMIL. We think that most B2B2C entry pages use far too much SMIL, and not enough Rails. Think virtual, subscriber-defined. The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not best-of-breed. Quick: do you have a vertical strategy for monitoring emerging all-hands meetings? If all of this may seem fabulous to you, that's because it is! men-in-white has revolutionized the conceptualization of structuring. Your budget for driving should be at least one-half of your budget for cultivating. Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be revolutionary? A company that can redefine defiantly will (at some point) be able to evolve elegantly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy operation. The mindshare factor can be summed up in one word: reconfigurable. The metrics for platforms are more well-understood if they are not next-generation. Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be B2C2B? We will regenerate our ability to visualize without depreciating our capability to drive. We think we know that if you exploit virtually then you may also expedite seamlessly. We have come to know that it is better to architect magnetically than to deploy proactively. What does the buzzword "extensible" really mean? Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be wireless?