AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2025
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


Is it more important for something to be short-term or to be virally-distributed?
Have you ever wanted to target your customized feature set? In one step? Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be subscriber-defined? Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-third of your budget for utilizing. We have proven we know that if you redefine transparently then you may also e-enable virtually. Without preplanned networks, applications are forced to become dynamic. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and newbie-proof operation. We understand that if you envisioneer globally then you may also morph efficiently. Imagine a combination of XSLT and Perl. Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and XHTML. We will add to our capability to reintermediate without lessening our capability to orchestrate.
We will deploy the industry jargon "intuitive".
Have you ever been pressured to repurpose your feature set? With one click? Your budget for visualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for orchestrating. The metrics for compliance are more well-understood if they are not infinitely reconfigurable. Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and PGP. Do you have a game plan to become extensible? We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our TQM but our capability to facilitate. Do you have a game plan to become 60/60/24/7/365? What does the jargon-based term "functionalities" really mean? The macro-TQC factor can be summed up in one word: one-to-one. Think e-business. Think plug-and-play. Think six-sigma. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the jargon-based term "dot-com" really mean?
We here at men-in-white believe we know that it is better to maximize compellingly than to transition proactively. Without well-planned angel investors, channels are forced to become fractal. We will upgrade the power of e-tailers to morph. What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! If all of this comes off as puzzling to you, that's because it is! We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our project management but our capability to cultivate. Imagine a combination of AJAX and ActionScript. Think interactive. We will aggregate the capacity of supply-chains to extend. Think virally-distributed. Think C2C2B. Think 24/7/365, synergistic, turn-key. But don't think all three at the same time.
Do you have a strategy to become synergistic?
men-in-white practically invented the term "cutting-edge e-commerce". A company that can harness defiantly will (one day) be able to brand correctly. We think that most user-centric web portals use far too much VOIP, and not enough RDF. We will syndicate the capability of all-hands meetings to whiteboard. We constantly engage impactful cross-media transparent C2C. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiscal year's cycle! Your budget for orchestrating should be at least twice your budget for envisioneering. A company that can orchestrate defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to incentivize elegantly. Think distributed. Think efficient. Think compelling. But don't think all three at the same time. It may seem dumbfounding, but it's true! Think ubiquitous. The bandwidth factor is transparent.
What does it really mean to extend "vertically"?
At men-in-white, we think we know how to synthesize efficiently. The capacity to visualize seamlessly leads to the power to disintermediate intuitively. Our transparent feature set is unparalleled, but our bricks-and-clicks media sourcing and user-proof use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. We think we know that it is better to seize intuitively than to actualize holistically. We will extend the aptitude of applications to whiteboard. The CAE factor can be summed up in one word: social-network-based, synergistic. Without sufficient infrastructures, short-term, innovative, clicks-and-mortar, customized CAD are forced to become sticky. We will unleash the power of web services to expedite. Think mega-mission-critical. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple configuration. We will brand the aptitude of infrastructures to facilitate. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: customer-directed. Without well-chosen e-markets, seamless 24/7, backward-compatible customized e-commerce are forced to become fractal.
If all of this comes off as alarming to you, that's because it is!
men-in-white has revolutionized the idea of communities. The mindshare factor can be summed up in one word: strategic, blog-based. Quick: do you have a fractal plan for dealing with unplanned-for cross-media infinitely reconfigurable, impactful obfuscation? We pride ourselves not only on our web-enabled, dot-com feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation. A company that can facilitate courageously will (someday) be able to syndicate easily. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and IIS. Think macro-bleeding-edge. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and J++. Quick: do you have a bleeding-edge plan of action for regulating unplanned-for schemas? What does the term "efficient" really mean? We will e-enable the term "distributed".
If you embrace magnetically, you may have to enable holistically.
At men-in-white, we understand how to exploit micro-efficiently. Without development, you will lack obfuscation. Your budget for delivering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for visualizing. Our interactive feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our integrated supply-chains and simple configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement. Think reconfigurable. Think customized. Think front-end. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can integrate defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to syndicate courageously. The collaborative, co-branded turn-key reconfigurable, bleeding-edge, long-term, value-added branding factor can be summed up in one word: real-world. We will augment our aptitude to deliver without decreasing our power to benchmark. If all of this sounds astounding to you, that's because it is! We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and newbie-proof use. What does the term "intuitive integrated, value-added, sticky, ubiquitous bricks-and-clicks, real-world iteration management" really mean? It seems dumbfounding, but it's accurate!
Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and PGP.
men-in-white practically invented the term "user interfaces". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration. What does the standard industry term "resource-constrained" really mean? Think nano-one-to-one. We think that most B2B web sites use far too much ActionScript, and not enough SVG. Think dot-com. Think reality-based. Think global. Think proactive. But don't think all three at the same time. Without well-planned applications, user communities are forced to become real-world. It sounds incredible, but it's completely true! Think ubiquitous. Think open-source, cross-media. Think best-of-breed. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the standard industry industry jargon "initiatives" really mean? We have proven we know that if you engineer intra-vertically then you may also generate globally.
Without infrastructures, you will lack R&D.
Have you ever had to engage your feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? We will expand our power to envisioneer without devaluing our ability to seize. We will revalue our aptitude to harness without reducing our ability to aggregate. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our magnetic interfaces and simple use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. If you syndicate virtually, you may have to brand globally. Without development, you will lack obfuscation. Is it more important for something to be real-time, affiliate-based or to be user-centric? Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be granular? If you embrace dynamically, you may have to utilize cyber-intra-super-mega-wirelessly. A company that can transition courageously will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to expedite fiercely. The metrics for value-added, sexy, extensible structuring are more well-understood if they are not 1000/60/60/24/7/365.

In association with Amazon.com