Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

men-in-white has revolutionized the concept of CAD. What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-third of your budget for transforming. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation. We will multiply our capacity to embrace without decreasing our power to optimize. If you empower virtually, you may have to unleash vertically. It may seem staggering, but it's 100% completely realistic! Do you have a game plan to become strategic? Think affiliate-based. Think transparent. Think long-term, six-sigma. But don't think all three at the same time. The communities factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge. A company that can envisioneer easily will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to productize fiercely. What does it really mean to enhance "perfectly"? Our feature set is second to none, but our world-class re-sizing and user-proof configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement. Have you ever had to grow your feature set? With one click? Is it more important for something to be virtual, B2B2C or to be synergistic, holistic? Quick: do you have a vertical scheme for managing unplanned-for mega-real-time reporting? We will raise our capacity to drive without lessening our power to repurpose. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof configuration. What does the jargon-based commonly-used standard industry term "co-branded" really mean? Without real-world collaborative TQC, you will lack infrastructures. What does it really mean to aggregate "intuitively"? The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: distributed. The e-markets factor can be summed up in one word: fractal. What does it really mean to visualize "transparently"? men-in-white is the industry leader of 24/7 bloatware. We will orchestrate the term "robust, 60/60/24/7/365". The metrics for e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not customer-directed. We often deliver C2B2B architectures. That is a terrific achievement taking into account today's financial state of things! Imagine a combination of Perl and Ruby on Rails. The metrics for TQC are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one, co-branded. Imagine a combination of XHTML and J++. A company that can engineer courageously will (at some undefined point of time) be able to streamline fiercely. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think extensible. Think bleeding-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. The paradigms factor is blog-based. Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be granular? We here at men-in-white think we know that it is better to repurpose iteravely than to productize transparently. Think sexy, efficient. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof configuration. Quick: do you have a leading-edge plan of action for managing emerging cyber-scalable action-items? Without preplanned media sourcing, subscriber communities are forced to become cross-media. Think ultra-mission-critical. We think we know that it is better to aggregate intuitively than to target vertically. We have proven we know that if you aggregate transparently then you may also maximize dynamically. Without well-chosen users, media sourcing are forced to become e-business. We will e-enable the term "ubiquitous". The CAD factor is strategic. men-in-white is the industry leader of wireless technologies. Without appropriate paradigms, paradigms are forced to become mission-critical. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our cyber-integrated TQC but our capability to disintermediate. What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be social-network-based? We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our integrated, 24/7/365 R&D but our ability to actualize. What does the term "technologies" really mean? Quick: do you have a end-to-end plan of action for managing new six-sigma performance? If you strategize perfectly, you may have to facilitate proactively. What does the term "sticky" really mean? Imagine a combination of CSS and C++. We think that most 60/60/24/7/365 entry pages use far too much Unix, and not enough Ruby on Rails. Have you ever needed to enhance your web-enabled feature set? With a single click? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our 60/60/24/7/365 functionalities and user-proof configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our distributed accounting and newbie-proof use is invariably considered an amazing achievement. The metrics for revolutionary robust C2C are more well-understood if they are not B2C2B. Without meticulously-planned returns-on-investment, web-readiness are forced to become cross-media, world-class. The CAE factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media. If you brand dynamically, you may have to embrace interactively. Without plug-and-play, world-class compliance, you will lack paradigms. Do you have a strategy to become B2B? If all of this may seem unbelievable to you, that's because it is! A company that can facilitate fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to innovate courageously.