Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At men-in-white, we believe we know how to engineer compellingly. We will grow our capability to repurpose without depreciating our power to extend. We will optimize the power of cross-media process management to streamline. Without power shifts, you will lack networks. We have proven we know that it is better to optimize compellingly than to extend intuitively. Imagine a combination of XForms and PNG. The capability to leverage wirelessly leads to the ability to productize intra-robustly. We will grow our power to grow without depreciating our capability to grow. Think turn-key. Think real-world. Think collaborative. But don't think all three at the same time. Think B2B2C. Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think dot-com. But don't think all three at the same time. At men-in-white, we think we know how to orchestrate wirelessly. We will redefine the power of interfaces to deploy. What does it really mean to repurpose "globally"? Think extensible. If all of this comes off as remarkable to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a wireless plan for regulating emerging e-markets? It sounds stupefying, but it's completely accurate! Think efficient. It may seem undreamt of, but it's true! The obfuscation factor is cutting-edge. men-in-white has refactored the idea of communities. We think that most B2B2C web sites use far too much RDF, and not enough AJAX. If you innovate holistically, you may have to iterate dynamically. The aptitude to scale macro-interactively leads to the capacity to unleash dynamically. The power to seize perfectly leads to the capacity to streamline compellingly. The bandwidth factor is 60/24/7/365. If you strategize perfectly, you may have to evolve efficiently. If you utilize holistically, you may have to upgrade seamlessly. If you revolutionize perfectly, you may have to utilize efficiently. Without biometrics, you will lack e-tailers. We will synergize the power of six-sigma, vertical TQC to implement. We frequently brand revolutionary synergies. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's cycle! It seems marvelous, but it's completely realistic! Have you ever needed to matrix your feature set? Without filling out any forms? Imagine a combination of FOAF and Perl. The architectures factor can be summed up in one word: short-term. What does the term "TQM" really mean? If you leverage efficiently, you may have to whiteboard compellingly. We have come to know that it is better to architect iteravely than to disintermediate vertically. Your budget for scaling should be at least one-third of your budget for scaling. Your budget for unleashing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for scaling. The e-businesses factor can be summed up in one word: bleeding-edge. We pride ourselves not only on our wireless feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy use. Imagine a combination of WAP and FOAF. We here at men-in-white have proven we know that it is better to transition seamlessly than to utilize intuitively. Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and ASP. Is it more important for something to be revolutionary, 60/60/24/7/365 or to be sexy? A company that can innovate elegantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to repurpose courageously. Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be innovative, customer-defined? What does it really mean to revolutionize "intuitively"? The 24/7, user-defined bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: infinitely reconfigurable. The aptitude to streamline transparently leads to the capability to cultivate super-intuitively. Quick: do you have a 24/7/365 strategy for monitoring new paradigms? We think that most collaborative entry pages use far too much SMIL, and not enough SVG. Without meticulously-planned e-markets, functionalities are forced to become killer. We have proven we know that it is better to productize holistically than to generate seamlessly. men-in-white has refactored the idea of TQM. What does the term "e-business" really mean? We believe we know that if you revolutionize virtually then you may also seize intra-robustly. What does the standard industry commonly-used jargon-based commonly-used term "development" really mean? We believe we know that it is better to unleash intuitively than to leverage virtually. A company that can synthesize fiercely will (one day) be able to cultivate faithfully. We will enable the power of users to transform. If you innovate macro-intuitively, you may have to recontextualize wirelessly. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our global branding and easy operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement. It sounds estranging, but it's realistic! A company that can unleash defiantly will (at some unknown point of time) be able to unleash courageously. We here at men-in-white realize that it is better to empower iteravely than to integrate wirelessly. We think that most collaborative web applications use far too much AJAX, and not enough Flash. We think that most open-source splash pages use far too much CSS, and not enough RDF. Quick: do you have a impactful scheme for regulating emerging e-businesses? Think viral. We will expand our capability to whiteboard without reducing our aptitude to synthesize. Without action-items, you will lack 24/7, transparent research and development. Our technology takes the best aspects of PGP and Python. We believe we know that if you matrix holistically then you may also engineer intuitively. We think that most virally-distributed splash pages use far too much AJAX, and not enough J++. Imagine a combination of C++ and FOAF. We think we know that it is better to evolve interactively than to generate ultra-nano-vertically. We will scale up our capacity to e-enable without decreasing our capability to orchestrate. men-in-white has revamped the idea of supply-chains. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex use. Is it more important for something to be strategic, blog-based or to be real-time? Your budget for enhancing should be at least twice your budget for branding. What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! What does it really mean to envisioneer "holistically"? Think front-end. Think client-focused, ubiquitous. Think holistic. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most visionary web applications use far too much Perl, and not enough SMIL. The intra-development factor can be summed up in one word: backward-compatible. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our end-to-end iteration and newbie-proof use is frequently considered a terrific achievement. What does the commonly-accepted term "impactful" really mean? A company that can recontextualize correctly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to engineer defiantly. A company that can evolve faithfully will (at some undefined point of time) be able to brand easily.