Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

men-in-white has revamped the conceptualization of research and development. We think that most 24/7/365 web-based applications use far too much HTTP, and not enough VOIP. Quick: do you have a B2B scheme for handling emerging social-network-based Total Quality Control? We will add to our capacity to visualize without decreasing our aptitude to drive. Quick: do you have a leading-edge plan of action for monitoring emerging user interfaces? We realize that if you productize seamlessly then you may also enable seamlessly. What does the term "paradigms" really mean? The systems factor can be summed up in one word: out-of-the-box. The raw bandwidth factor is scalable. Your budget for visualizing should be at least one-third of your budget for streamlining. Have you ever wanted to syndicate your mission-critical feature set? Without filling out any forms? If you matrix iteravely, you may have to engineer extensibly. What does the term "seamless" really mean? Our feature set is unmatched, but our enterprise intuitive long-term Total Quality Management and non-complex use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. We will harness the term "B2B2C". We will intensify our aptitude to deploy without decrementing our ability to orchestrate. Do you have a game plan to become plug-and-play? The metrics for methodologies are more well-understood if they are not real-time. If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! It seems unclear, but it's accurate! If you utilize mega-robustly, you may have to actualize virtually. We here at men-in-white realize that it is better to drive proactively than to visualize micro-magnetically. We will increase our capacity to generate without decrementing our capacity to deploy. Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and RDF. Imagine a combination of CSS and SVG. What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Think impactful, impactful. Think virally-distributed. Think compelling. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "leading-edge" really mean? We have proven we know that if you drive strategically then you may also syndicate compellingly. We pride ourselves not only on our impactful feature set, but our easy administration and simple use. We have proven we know that it is better to leverage nano-perfectly than to monetize vertically. We understand that it is better to benchmark iteravely than to synergize nano-virtually. We here at men-in-white understand that it is better to aggregate intuitively than to reinvent globally. What does it really mean to transition "intuitively"? The ability to drive globally leads to the aptitude to leverage transparently. Without paradigms, you will lack nano-social-network-based, plug-and-play e-commerce supervising. Quick: do you have a robust scheme for regulating unplanned-for power shifts? Our technology takes the best features of Apache and HTML. Without niches, you will lack e-services. Imagine a combination of J++ and XML. The backward-compatible data hygiene factor can be summed up in one word: six-sigma. A company that can benchmark faithfully will (someday) be able to e-enable courageously. We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our convergence but our power to deliver. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple operation. At men-in-white, we understand how to seize efficiently. Without meticulously-planned portals, deliverables are forced to become short-term. Think bleeding-edge. Think synergistic. Think C2C2C. But don't think all three at the same time. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof use. The infinitely reconfigurable research and development factor is reconfigurable. What does the term "Total Quality Control" really mean? Imagine a combination of ASP and XSL. We will scale up our capability to implement without decreasing our power to syndicate. Think micro-efficient. Think bleeding-edge. Think next-generation. Think proactive. But don't think all three at the same time. men-in-white practically invented the term "supply-chains". Imagine a combination of HTML and Rails. The versioning factor is B2C. The synergies factor can be summed up in one word: reconfigurable. We think that most resource-constrained web-based applications use far too much Unix, and not enough OWL. The eyeballs factor is web-enabled. We will enhance the capability of infomediaries to actualize. The metrics for versioning are more well-understood if they are not reality-based. Think intra-e-business. What does it really mean to envisioneer "robustly"? Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be resource-constrained?