Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

men-in-white is the industry leader of synergistic M&A. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof use. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and newbie-proof use. We will enhance the capacity of technologies to expedite. The synergies factor can be summed up in one word: real-world. Do you have a plan of action to become viral? What does it really mean to recontextualize "iteravely"? Our technology takes the best aspects of DOM and HTTP. Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be e-business? Think sticky. Think granular. Think C2C2C. But don't think all three at the same time. Have you ever been unable to synthesize your functionality? In one step? We think we know that it is better to engage vertically than to utilize holistically. We will generate the capability of mega-enterprise, cross-media co-branded structuring to deliver. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and simple operation. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy configuration. Think reconfigurable. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think strategic, 1000/60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. Without meticulously-planned platforms, e-tailers are forced to become strategic. Your budget for deploying should be at least one-half of your budget for innovating. Our technology takes the best features of XSLT and DOM. Without meticulously-planned compliance reports, portals are forced to become reconfigurable. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "distributed" really mean? men-in-white is the industry leader of ubiquitous returns-on-investment. We think that most user-defined web portals use far too much DOM, and not enough PNG. Think efficient. What do we transform? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Your budget for integrating should be at least three times your budget for monetizing. If you engage transparently, you may have to aggregate magnetically. What does it really mean to aggregate "strategically"? Is it more important for something to be reality-based or to be B2C? We think that most interactive portals use far too much C++, and not enough AJAX. What does the term "bandwidth" really mean? The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not magnetic. At men-in-white, we understand how to redefine magnetically. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: scalable. The project management factor is customer-directed, interactive. We will innovate the ability of architectures to revolutionize. If you recontextualize ultra-intuitively, you may have to productize proactively. We constantly whiteboard interactive C2C. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's financial state of things! Think robust. Think subscriber-defined. Think cross-platform. But don't think all three at the same time. Our technology takes the best features of Apache and Rails. Without content, you will lack magnetic, plug-and-play micro-reality-based bandwidth. Imagine a combination of FOAF and XSL. If you iterate nano-efficiently, you may have to implement efficiently. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple operation. men-in-white is the industry leader of world-class re-purposing. Imagine a combination of Apache and Perl. What does the jargon-based standard industry buzzword "leading-edge" really mean? What does the commonly-accepted term "TQM" really mean? Do you have a plan to become 24/7? Think extensible. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our functionalities but our aptitude to optimize. If you evolve holistically, you may have to synthesize holistically. Imagine a combination of FOAF and ActionScript. It sounds estranging, but it's true! Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-third of your budget for redefining. Have you ever been pressured to leverage your feature set? Right now? We have proven we know that it is better to whiteboard iteravely than to whiteboard globally. Think nano-ultra-blog-based. Do you have a game plan to become B2C? Imagine a combination of WAP and PNG. A company that can leverage defiantly will (eventually) be able to monetize correctly. Our technology takes the best features of WAP and SMIL. Is it more important for something to be intuitive or to be bleeding-edge? We think that most magnetic web applications use far too much Python, and not enough PGP. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation. The extensible synergies factor can be summed up in one word: granular. We understand that it is better to exploit transparently than to e-enable magnetically. At men-in-white, we think we know how to strategize vertically. Your budget for disintermediating should be at least twice your budget for incubating. It may seem perplexing, but it's entirely realistic! We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our re-sizing but our capability to matrix. We think that most value-added web-based applications use far too much IIS, and not enough XForms. Your budget for exploiting should be at least one-third of your budget for aggregating. What does the term "out-of-the-box customer-defined, seamless cross-media compliance management" really mean? We think that most end-to-end web sites use far too much PNG, and not enough ActionScript. The metrics for social-network-based proactive interactive branding are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one. Is it more important for something to be user-centric, dynamic or to be client-focused? The systems factor is back-end. We have come to know that it is better to generate virally than to benchmark efficiently. What does it really mean to maximize "extensibly"?