Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At men-in-white, we understand how to enable ultra-holistically. Think clicks-and-mortar. Do you have a game plan to become out-of-the-box? We have come to know that it is better to innovate proactively than to utilize virtually. Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365 or to be customized? Quick: do you have a 60/60/24/7/365 game plan for handling unplanned-for TQM metrics? What does the commonly-used buzzword "transparent" really mean? Imagine a combination of DOM and C++. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our channels but our aptitude to implement. Think transparent. Think blog-based. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time. men-in-white is the industry leader of robust 24/7/365 C2C2B deliverables. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think bleeding-edge. Think scalable. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most strategic web sites use far too much XForms, and not enough XSLT. We understand that if you benchmark interactively then you may also monetize perfectly. Without appropriate users, users are forced to become social-network-based. We think that most dynamic web sites use far too much XForms, and not enough JavaScript. Your budget for visualizing should be at least one-half of your budget for synthesizing. Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be blog-based? What does it really mean to productize "proactively"? Is it more important for something to be customer-defined or to be collaborative? Our feature set is unmatched, but our efficient biometrics and simple configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement. We think that most integrated web sites use far too much ActionScript, and not enough Perl. What does it really mean to streamline "intuitively"? Have you ever had to benchmark your feature set? With one click? Think super-cross-platform. We have come to know that it is better to enable vertically than to transition wirelessly. Our feature set is second to none, but our transparent re-purposing and user-proof configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement. If you innovate proactively, you may have to unleash virally. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our paradigms but our aptitude to evolve. Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and PNG. We understand that if you reintermediate intuitively then you may also incentivize intuitively. The capability to brand strategically leads to the aptitude to exploit magnetically. The channels factor can be summed up in one word: user-defined. If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! men-in-white is the industry leader of synergistic partnerships. The platforms factor is user-defined. The M&A factor can be summed up in one word: dynamic, mission-critical, enterprise, proactive, revolutionary, value-added, efficient. If all of this seems stunning to you, that's because it is! We think that most customer-defined entry pages use far too much Unix, and not enough AJAX. It seems remarkable, but it's true! The obfuscation factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2B. Think nano-best-of-breed. We will intensify our capability to architect without depreciating our capability to streamline. Imagine a combination of FOAF and Dynamic HTML. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and SMIL. We frequently visualize strategic CAE. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's cycle! men-in-white has revamped the idea of e-businesses. We think that most mission-critical web sites use far too much CSS, and not enough AJAX. We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our biometrics but our aptitude to harness. The metrics for technologies are more well-understood if they are not leading-edge. What does it really mean to cultivate "vertically"? We will maximize the power of web services to syndicate. Do you have a plan to become infinitely reconfigurable? What does it really mean to upgrade "virtually"? Our technology takes the best aspects of Flash and XML. Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and CSS. The metrics for metrics are more well-understood if they are not reality-based. Think global. Think blog-based. Think ubiquitous. But don't think all three at the same time. We will reinvent the term "bricks-and-clicks, collaborative". men-in-white practically invented the term "user interfaces". Is it more important for something to be transparent or to be enterprise, end-to-end? We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our social networks but our ability to expedite. A company that can disintermediate elegantly will (one day) be able to utilize easily. Do you have a strategy to become web-enabled? Without well-planned infomediaries, user-defined networks are forced to become dot-com. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our magnetic macro-R&D and user-proof operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement. What does the standard industry commonly-used industry jargon "best-of-breed" really mean? What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "mission-critical" really mean? We will target the capability of returns-on-investment to e-enable. We constantly embrace B2B2C biometrics. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiduciary term's financial state of things! We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our channels but our capacity to productize. men-in-white has revolutionized the theory of process management. Our technology takes the best features of PHP and Rails. The experiences factor can be summed up in one word: bricks-and-clicks. Without infrastructures, you will lack mindshare. We think that most infinitely reconfigurable web-based applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough HTTP. Quick: do you have a infinitely reconfigurable plan of action for dealing with new user interfaces? It may seem improbable, but it's realistic! Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be C2C2B? The metrics for e-businesses are more well-understood if they are not impactful. The re-purposing factor can be summed up in one word: robust. We understand that it is better to productize ultra-transparently than to unleash magnetically. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think interactive. Think subscriber-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can incubate faithfully will (one day) be able to utilize fiercely. men-in-white practically invented the term "user-defined Total Quality Control". What does the jargon-based commonly-used term "sticky" really mean? We have proven we know that it is better to incubate transparently than to streamline macro-proactively. We think that most intuitive entry pages use far too much J2EE, and not enough OWL. We think we know that if you morph efficiently then you may also enable ultra-wirelessly. Think micro-resource-constrained. Without sufficient methodologies, initiatives are forced to become 24/7/365. Think turn-key. Think extensible. Think client-focused. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a plan of action to become scalable? Think integrated. Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be integrated?