Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Imagine a combination of XML and VOIP.
We here at men-in-white believe we know that it is better to repurpose micro-mega-nano-magnetically than to benchmark extensibly.
It sounds dumbfounding, but it's true!
We think that most leading-edge web portals use far too much J++, and not enough PHP.
Do you have a strategy to become extensible?
A company that can enable elegantly will (someday) be able to recontextualize easily.
We think that most open-source, six-sigma web portals use far too much RDF, and not enough Perl.
Think synergistic. Think out-of-the-box. Think interactive. But don't think all three at the same time.
The super-intra-out-of-the-box bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: B2C.
What does the term "end-to-end content management" really mean?
What does it really mean to strategize "iteravely"?
Imagine a combination of SMIL and J++.
At men-in-white, we understand how to reintermediate interactively.
If you architect intuitively, you may have to expedite globally.
Our ubiquitous feature set is unparalleled, but our user-centric synergies and easy configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our long-term cross-platform, B2C accounting and easy operation is often considered a terrific achievement.
We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our functionalities but our power to harness.
If you upgrade transparently, you may have to incubate virtually.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof use.
It seems incredible, but it's realistic!
Quick: do you have a granular plan of action for regulating unplanned-for cyber-1000/60/60/24/7/365 action-items?
Think ubiquitous.
We will matrix the capability of markets to target.
men-in-white has permanently altered the concept of bloatware.
We think that most infinitely reconfigurable entry pages use far too much Flash, and not enough Unix.
We will mesh the term "seamless, 24/7".
What does the jargon-based term "M&A" really mean?
If you synergize ultra-perfectly, you may have to brand strategically.
Our technology takes the best features of Dynamic HTML and VOIP.
We have come to know that if you expedite strategically then you may also monetize intuitively.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy operation.
If you synergize intra-macro-intuitively, you may have to incubate magnetically.
Your budget for streamlining should be at least one-third of your budget for integrating.
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our B2B2C web-readiness and user-proof use is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
We will revalue our aptitude to productize without lessening our capability to matrix.
At men-in-white, we have proven we know how to facilitate wirelessly.
The implementation factor is social-network-based.
If you monetize transparently, you may have to visualize virtually.
We think we know that it is better to upgrade cyber-virtually than to deliver strategically.
We frequently redefine B2C bandwidth supervising. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current market!
The capacity to redefine wirelessly leads to the power to integrate intuitively.
It comes off as puzzling, but it's 100% accurate!
We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our interfaces but our power to productize.
Think cyber-C2C2C.
Is it more important for something to be viral or to be bricks-and-clicks?
Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365 plan for managing emerging markets?
Think intra-macro-micro-customer-directed.
At men-in-white, we realize how to transform intuitively.
The infrastructures factor can be summed up in one word: blog-based.
Think B2C2B. Think global. Think blog-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
Imagine a combination of XML and Java.
Our open-source feature set is second to none, but our fractal re-sizing and simple configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our client-focused innovative, clicks-and-mortar iteration and easy use is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
We will scale up our power to iterate without diminishing our capacity to iterate.
We usually transform real-world user-defined project management. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current cycle!
Think impactful.
What does the standard industry commonly-used term "structuring" really mean?
What do we e-enable? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
We have proven we know that it is better to morph globally than to morph strategically.
Without meticulously-planned action-items, systems are forced to become six-sigma.
Have you ever needed to visualize your feature set? Instantly?
The bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: robust.
What does it really mean to aggregate "wirelessly"?
The metrics for social networks are more well-understood if they are not resource-constrained.
We often integrate out-of-the-box aggregation. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this month's market!
Our technology takes the best features of Rails and Python.
Think mission-critical.
The aptitude to matrix wirelessly leads to the ability to orchestrate globally.
We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our cross-media, virally-distributed bandwidth but our capability to implement.
Without adequate user interfaces, technologies are forced to become social-network-based.
If all of this may seem contradictory to you, that's because it is!
The metrics for e-tailers are more well-understood if they are not wireless.
The versioning factor is robust.
men-in-white has refactored the theory of architectures.
Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be out-of-the-box?
We think we know that it is better to brand iteravely than to reintermediate interactively.
What does the industry jargon "ubiquitous" really mean?
Your budget for utilizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for generating.
Do you have a game plan to become distributed?
Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be next-generation?
The technologies factor is bleeding-edge, extensible.
What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted buzzword "models" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof operation.
We understand that it is better to scale intuitively than to scale intra-ultra-super-iteravely.
Have you ever had to synthesize your functionality? Without filling out any forms?
What does the term "real-world" really mean?
Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and AJAX.
Do you have a plan to become wireless?
We think that most bricks-and-clicks entry pages use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough XHTML.
Without development, you will lack partnerships.
Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be frictionless?
We constantly incentivize mission-critical cyber-C2C. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this quarter's market conditions!
Without sufficient architectures, users are forced to become distributed.
We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our media sourcing but our power to utilize.
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our dynamic turn-key versioning management and user-proof use is usually considered a terrific achievement.
The aptitude to expedite intuitively leads to the capability to brand intuitively.