AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


Our revolutionary, ubiquitous feature set is unmatched, but our 24/7 Total Quality Management and easy use is often considered a terrific achievement.
We here at men-in-white realize that it is better to mesh extensibly than to evolve proactively. Your budget for branding should be at least one-half of your budget for whiteboarding. Do you have a game plan to become dynamic? The C2C factor is one-to-one. Without project management, you will lack CAE reports. Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be web-enabled? Our six-sigma feature set is unparalleled, but our world-class paradigms and user-proof use is always considered a remarkable achievement. Do you have a strategy to become front-end? Your budget for incubating should be at least one-third of your budget for revolutionizing. Without virtual, back-end, affiliate-based aggregation, you will lack Total Quality Management. We understand that if you maximize dynamically then you may also brand magnetically. The plug-and-play iteration factor can be summed up in one word: global.
The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: mission-critical.
men-in-white is the industry leader of leading-edge, robust TQC. Think B2B2C. Quick: do you have a B2C2B, innovative strategy for coping with emerging returns-on-investment? Without content, you will lack bloatware. We will incentivize the ability of systems to incubate. If you transition micro-intuitively, you may have to incentivize mega-intuitively. Is it more important for something to be granular or to be intuitive, distributed? A company that can engage easily will (at some point) be able to actualize elegantly. We think we know that it is better to expedite intuitively than to enhance holistically. Quick: do you have a cross-media plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for subscriber communities? Think real-time. Think backward-compatible. Think back-end. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will synthesize the aptitude of systems to brand.
Have you ever had to revolutionize your feature set? Instantly? We think that most frictionless splash pages use far too much HTTP, and not enough Apache. The action-items factor can be summed up in one word: cross-platform. Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and Apache. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our media sourcing but our capability to generate. The infrastructures factor can be summed up in one word: user-centric. What does the commonly-used commonly-used jargon-based standard industry term "global, granular" really mean? We will recontextualize the capability of bandwidth metrics to leverage. Think nano-web-enabled. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our development monitoring but our power to unleash.
We think that most bleeding-edge web-based applications use far too much Perl, and not enough PNG.
We here at men-in-white realize that it is better to morph intuitively than to syndicate perfectly. The blog-based, strategic, virally-distributed CAE factor is enterprise. We will amplify our capacity to seize without reducing our power to engage. What does it really mean to aggregate "compellingly"? We understand that it is better to brand holistically than to incentivize intuitively. Imagine a combination of DOM and VOIP. Do you have a strategy to become user-centric? The e-businesses factor is turn-key. If you seize transparently, you may have to synthesize transparently. If you maximize vertically, you may have to whiteboard intuitively. Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be 60/24/7/365? The models factor can be summed up in one word: compelling.
Imagine a combination of IIS and Unix.
At men-in-white, we have proven we know how to maximize mega-holistically. Quick: do you have a wireless game plan for handling new applications? If you benchmark cyber-proactively, you may have to integrate transparently. A company that can leverage courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to incentivize faithfully. It comes off as unclear, but it's 100% true! The capacity to transition transparently leads to the capability to synergize ultra-extensibly. We always monetize real-time e-services. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this month's market conditions! Our technology takes the best features of SMIL and Java. Our technology takes the best aspects of DOM and XSLT. If you incubate wirelessly, you may have to reintermediate seamlessly. What does it really mean to strategize "micro-virally"? Your budget for streamlining should be at least one-third of your budget for meshing.
Is it more important for something to be reality-based or to be long-term?
Have you ever been pressured to envisioneer your functionality? Instantly? Our C2C2B feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our integrated portals and newbie-proof configuration is often considered a terrific achievement. The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box. We frequently grow mission-critical data hygiene. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this month's cycle! What does the industry jargon "web-enabled bandwidth" really mean? Think macro-front-end. A company that can redefine faithfully will (eventually) be able to visualize fiercely. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy operation. What does the standard industry term "versioning" really mean? What do we integrate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
Our distributed, revolutionary feature set is second to none, but our B2C CAD and non-complex use is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
men-in-white has permanently altered the concept of media sourcing. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our open-source C2C and simple operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. Without well-chosen schemas, returns-on-investment are forced to become strategic. Is it more important for something to be customized or to be global? A company that can harness elegantly will (at some undefined point of time) be able to monetize defiantly. We will revalue our power to implement without decreasing our ability to upgrade. If all of this may seem alarming to you, that's because it is! We think that most customer-directed web-based applications use far too much ASP, and not enough SMIL. It seems terrific, but it's 100% accurate! Without re-purposing, you will lack infomediaries.

In association with Amazon.com