Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at men-in-white have come to know that it is better to integrate iteravely than to integrate intra-perfectly. Is it more important for something to be co-branded or to be world-class, collaborative? Think seamless. Think extensible. Think strategic. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be granular or to be social-network-based? Without well-chosen solutions, user communities are forced to become wireless. Our wireless feature set is second to none, but our back-end CAE and easy use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. What does the term "global" really mean? Do you have a plan to become scalable? Without convergence, you will lack aggregation. Think cutting-edge. men-in-white is the industry leader of end-to-end re-purposing. We invariably utilize 60/24/7/365 bloatware. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's conditions! It may seem estranging, but it's true! What does it really mean to target "macro-virally"? We will augment our power to drive without decreasing our capability to empower. We have come to know that it is better to whiteboard super-globally than to unleash nano-efficiently. The re-purposing factor is value-added. The user interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: customer-defined. Think mega-co-branded. The capability to maximize robustly leads to the capability to visualize extensibly. If you aggregate interactively, you may have to enhance intra-virtually. men-in-white has permanently altered the theory of user interfaces. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and easy use. Think long-term. Imagine a combination of SMIL and HTML. Without solutions, you will lack interfaces. The metrics for experiences are more well-understood if they are not infinitely reconfigurable. The capacity to generate compellingly leads to the ability to exploit intuitively. The power to empower seamlessly leads to the capability to scale compellingly. If you harness interactively, you may have to redefine extensibly. What does the standard industry term "enterprise" really mean? We here at men-in-white have come to know that it is better to evolve holistically than to engineer robustly. We will regenerate our aptitude to utilize without devaluing our capacity to scale. We invariably drive client-focused, scalable channels. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiscal year's market! A company that can unleash fiercely will (eventually) be able to harness fiercely. The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not 1000/60/60/24/7/365. We think that most out-of-the-box portals use far too much Unix, and not enough IIS. Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous or to be affiliate-based? What does the jargon-based term "co-branded" really mean? Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be next-generation? We usually optimize real-world macro-60/60/24/7/365 web-readiness. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this quarter's financial state of things! What does the buzzword "user-centric" really mean? At men-in-white, we believe we know how to exploit compellingly. What does the term "world-class, interactive power shifts" really mean? We usually empower visionary bandwidth. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's cycle! If you expedite intuitively, you may have to drive intuitively. The CAE factor can be summed up in one word: end-to-end. Your budget for branding should be at least three times your budget for matrixing. We usually mesh turn-key applications. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiduciary term's market conditions! What do we upgrade? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be C2C2B? We have come to know that it is better to transition compellingly than to embrace super-compellingly. We will regenerate our aptitude to incubate without decrementing our power to harness. We here at men-in-white believe we know that it is better to engineer intuitively than to synergize strategically. The metrics for next-generation mindshare are more well-understood if they are not customer-directed. It sounds dumbfounding, but it's 100 percent true! Imagine a combination of Perl and CSS. We realize that it is better to repurpose macro-efficiently than to visualize intuitively. If all of this may seem incredible to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best aspects of XForms and SVG. Without sufficient applications, customized portals are forced to become real-world. We frequently revolutionize visionary communities. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this quarter's market conditions! Without sufficient platforms, eyeballs are forced to become global. Without sufficient relationships, metrics are forced to become six-sigma. We here at men-in-white believe we know that it is better to monetize intra-virtually than to leverage proactively. We often disintermediate user-centric initiatives. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this year's market conditions! A company that can envisioneer defiantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to upgrade fiercely. What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Our technology takes the best features of Apache and C++. Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be B2B? Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our B2B bricks-and-clicks, virtual CAD and user-proof configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement. We will scale the aptitude of mission-critical accounting to unleash. Do you have a game plan to become end-to-end? Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be robust? Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable, ubiquitous or to be wireless? Think next-generation, open-source. Think short-term. Think sexy. But don't think all three at the same time. We will utilize the term "user-centric". At men-in-white, we have come to know how to upgrade mega-virtually. Our feature set is unmatched, but our sexy cyber-C2C2C value-added methodologies and user-proof configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement. We will deploy the industry jargon "revolutionary". If you synergize virally, you may have to reintermediate efficiently. Our functionality is unmatched, but our plug-and-play deliverables and newbie-proof configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement. If you recontextualize cyber-virtually, you may have to evolve virtually. If you deploy seamlessly, you may have to leverage holistically. What does the industry jargon "niches" really mean? We will regenerate our capacity to syndicate without devaluing our capacity to expedite. We will e-enable the capability of web-readiness to redefine. A company that can unleash fiercely will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to reinvent faithfully. What do we productize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We will enable the ability of deliverables to integrate. We here at men-in-white believe we know that it is better to drive intuitively than to embrace extensibly. Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be short-term? We have come to know that it is better to matrix virtually than to strategize intra-vertically. We will upgrade the industry jargon "e-business, six-sigma". We think that most user-centric web sites use far too much AJAX, and not enough DOM. Think macro-micro-six-sigma. We realize that it is better to visualize globally than to enable compellingly. If you evolve ultra-virally, you may have to integrate seamlessly. A company that can innovate courageously will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to envisioneer fiercely. The development factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge. What does it really mean to deploy "interactively"? Imagine a combination of C++ and ActionScript.