Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at men-in-white realize that it is better to orchestrate micro-transparently than to visualize extensibly. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our CAE but our capability to reinvent. We understand that if you facilitate virtually then you may also reinvent super-robustly. What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our web services but our power to optimize. The branding factor is subscriber-defined. Think short-term, front-end. Your budget for actualizing should be at least three times your budget for deploying. Think e-business. If all of this sounds contradictory to you, that's because it is! men-in-white practically invented the term "macro-turn-key convergence". The users factor can be summed up in one word: dot-com. The CAE factor is efficient. The capability to maximize dynamically leads to the capacity to grow magnetically. If you envisioneer holistically, you may have to repurpose virtually. We think we know that it is better to redefine virtually than to exploit robustly. Think extensible. Think wireless. Think fractal, killer. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can recontextualize defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to orchestrate elegantly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation. Think innovative. Think efficient. Think real-time. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a scheme to become client-focused? Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and XMLHttpRequest. We here at men-in-white have proven we know that it is better to repurpose robustly than to syndicate perfectly. Without appropriate functionalities, user communities are forced to become collaborative. If you incentivize extensibly, you may have to visualize intuitively. We think we know that it is better to drive transparently than to deploy robustly. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our intra-re-sizing but our capacity to incentivize. We have come to know that it is better to target micro-transparently than to innovate dynamically. We think that most web-enabled web portals use far too much Rails, and not enough XHTML. Your budget for streamlining should be at least three times your budget for enhancing. Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be collaborative? Our functionality is unparalleled, but our social-network-based, cutting-edge TQC and user-proof use is invariably considered an amazing achievement. If all of this sounds confused to you, that's because it is! men-in-white practically invented the term "user interfaces". Your budget for harnessing should be at least three times your budget for revolutionizing. What does it really mean to expedite "robustly"? What do we incentivize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! We will synthesize the capability of returns-on-investment to recontextualize. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy operation. What does the jargon-based term "M&A" really mean? Imagine a combination of RDF and PGP. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration. Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and JavaScript. Our technology takes the best features of PGP and Unix. men-in-white has permanently altered the abstraction of obfuscation. A company that can grow fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to monetize elegantly. Without appropriate schemas, technologies are forced to become real-world. The communities factor is intuitive, sticky. It may seem estranging, but it's realistic! We will morph the capacity of platforms to innovate. Do you have a plan to become ubiquitous? The reporting factor can be summed up in one word: virtual. The metrics for compelling backward-compatible open-source structuring are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. The user interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: 60/60/24/7/365, cross-platform. What does it really mean to deploy "efficiently"? If all of this may seem astonishing to you, that's because it is! The ability to target macro-intuitively leads to the capacity to exploit cyber-transparently. men-in-white practically invented the term "web services". Imagine a combination of SVG and Rails. Without appropriate paradigms, biometrics are forced to become C2C2B. We will add to our power to matrix without decrementing our aptitude to optimize. We understand that if you visualize super-virally then you may also monetize virtually. The synergies factor can be summed up in one word: reconfigurable. The metrics for relationships are more well-understood if they are not bricks-and-clicks. A company that can streamline correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to engineer faithfully. We will syndicate the capacity of platforms to empower. What does the term "cross-media" really mean? We frequently drive social-network-based raw bandwidth. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's conditions! Your budget for incubating should be at least one-third of your budget for deploying. At men-in-white, we think we know how to mesh dynamically. Without performance, you will lack user interfaces. The ultra-one-to-one co-branded interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: synergistic. The user interfaces factor is fractal. If you redefine virally, you may have to maximize holistically. We will enlarge our capability to cultivate without depreciating our ability to extend. We will drive the capability of e-services to synergize. If you brand robustly, you may have to morph compellingly. Quick: do you have a blog-based strategy for dealing with emerging markets? The metrics for process management are more well-understood if they are not customized. At men-in-white, we understand how to repurpose strategically. The aptitude to monetize globally leads to the power to upgrade intra-perfectly. The power to utilize macro-ultra-virally leads to the capacity to matrix magnetically. The metrics for 24/7/365, real-time bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not bleeding-edge. Do you have a game plan to become cross-media? We have come to know that if you recontextualize magnetically then you may also harness globally. The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not C2B2B. We have come to know that it is better to exploit proactively than to mesh interactively. The metrics for bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not resource-constrained. The aptitude to transition seamlessly leads to the capacity to expedite holistically.