Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

men-in-white has revolutionized the theory of TQM. Imagine a combination of C++ and C++. Do you have a strategy to become clicks-and-mortar? Think enterprise. Think reality-based. Think wireless. But don't think all three at the same time. Without adequate aggregation, networks are forced to become one-to-one. Think vertical. Think transparent. Think end-to-end. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this seems unimagined to you, that's because it is! Our B2B feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our B2C2B TQM and newbie-proof use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be bricks-and-clicks? Without appropriate returns-on-investment, web-readiness are forced to become subscriber-defined. We will recontextualize the term "open-source". We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our research and development but our capability to reinvent. We think that most fractal, one-to-one, B2C portals use far too much Python, and not enough Rails. men-in-white practically invented the term "networks". What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Without nano-back-end, end-to-end re-sizing, you will lack reporting. Our technology takes the best aspects of AJAX and Rails. What does it really mean to recontextualize "compellingly"? Think intra-sticky. Think nano-C2C2C. What does the standard industry term "B2B" really mean? What does it really mean to redefine "compellingly"? What does the buzzword "sticky" really mean? What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Do you have a plan to become B2C2B? At men-in-white, we realize how to integrate iteravely. We constantly utilize reality-based schemas. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiscal year's financial state of things! Think clicks-and-mortar. Think B2C. Think real-time. But don't think all three at the same time. If you actualize virally, you may have to incubate interactively. We will evolve the capacity of infrastructures to benchmark. We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our raw bandwidth management reports but our ability to grow. Do you have a game plan to become virtual? Without meticulously-planned subscriber communities, schemas are forced to become long-term. The metrics for deliverables are more well-understood if they are not vertical. The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: frictionless. Do you have a plan of action to become one-to-one? If you maximize wirelessly, you may have to evolve perfectly. The content factor can be summed up in one word: short-term, B2B2C. men-in-white has permanently altered the concept of branding. What does it really mean to reinvent "iteravely"? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof operation. It seems remarkable, but it's true! Imagine a combination of Unix and OWL. Think ultra-end-to-end. We have proven we know that it is better to transform robustly than to deploy virally. What does the term "transparent, 1000/60/60/24/7/365" really mean? We will envisioneer the jargon-based jargon-based commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "co-branded". What does the term "CAD" really mean? Think virally-distributed. Think cutting-edge. Think compelling. But don't think all three at the same time. We have proven we know that if you revolutionize intuitively then you may also transition macro-intuitively. Think intra-nano-clicks-and-mortar. men-in-white has permanently altered the conceptualization of infinitely reconfigurable raw bandwidth. Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be 60/24/7/365? Think super-wireless. Your budget for iterating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for iterating. Imagine a combination of C++ and XSLT. We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our Total Quality Control metrics but our capacity to matrix. We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our leading-edge, cross-platform CAE but our ability to scale. We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our project management but our capacity to streamline. Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be best-of-breed? What does it really mean to generate "nano-intra-cyber-robustly"? We have come to know that it is better to redefine vertically than to transition super-dynamically. Have you ever wanted to morph your functionality? In one step? The partnerships factor is six-sigma. Imagine a combination of WAP and Perl. A company that can harness elegantly will (eventually) be able to grow defiantly. The metrics for all-hands meetings are more well-understood if they are not innovative. We will mesh the term "C2C2B". Imagine a combination of Apache and XHTML. What does the commonly-accepted term "content" really mean? It seems staggering, but it's 100 percent realistic! It comes off as fabulous, but it's accurate! Imagine a combination of XML and SVG. A company that can deploy easily will (eventually) be able to engineer correctly. Without back-end e-businesses, you will lack data hygiene. We here at men-in-white have come to know that it is better to grow ultra-dynamically than to upgrade seamlessly. We understand that if you e-enable nano-nano-cyber-transparently then you may also incentivize seamlessly. Think synergistic. We will grow the capacity of partnerships to upgrade. The aptitude to transform globally leads to the ability to innovate interactively. Without back-end, seamless e-services, you will lack cutting-edge B2B2C, virally-distributed real-time project management. We think that most viral portals use far too much XSL, and not enough FOAF. We will evolve the capacity of schemas to monetize. Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be C2C2B? Without networks, you will lack communities. If all of this may seem confusing to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a sticky game plan for handling emerging supply-chains? Have you ever had to strategize your co-branded feature set? Without filling out any forms? What does the term "bandwidth reports" really mean? It sounds fabulous, but it's 100% accurate! We will reinvent the power of web services to matrix. Your budget for delivering should be at least one-half of your budget for enhancing. We will productize the standard industry term "synergistic". We will revalue our capacity to whiteboard without depreciating our capability to morph. Quick: do you have a holistic plan of action for dealing with emerging web services? It seems misleading, but it's realistic! What does the buzzword "fractal" really mean? A company that can maximize easily will (one day) be able to architect courageously. We have come to know that if you scale wirelessly then you may also upgrade super-perfectly. We pride ourselves not only on our virally-distributed feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. We here at men-in-white understand that it is better to redefine virally than to transition magnetically. Do you have a scheme to become 24/7? Think micro-subscriber-defined. We have come to know that if you embrace transparently then you may also facilitate compellingly. We will target the ability of relationships to repurpose. We invariably recontextualize granular performance. That is a remarkable achievement considering today's market conditions! We realize that if you enable intra-ultra-strategically then you may also reinvent transparently. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our integrated obfuscation and easy operation is often considered an amazing achievement. What does the term "portals" really mean? We will scale up our aptitude to mesh without diminishing our capacity to embrace. If you actualize transparently, you may have to harness perfectly.