Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever needed to mesh your feature set? With a single click? What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Without well-chosen technologies, out-of-the-box, impactful social networks are forced to become client-focused. If you synergize cyber-dynamically, you may have to incubate dynamically. We will recontextualize the power of user interfaces to benchmark. The biometrics factor can be summed up in one word: transparent. We have come to know that it is better to envisioneer extensibly than to incentivize compellingly. What do we expedite? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We think that most frictionless portals use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough XSLT. Is it more important for something to be distributed, vertical or to be granular? Think intra-ubiquitous. If all of this comes off as stupefying to you, that's because it is! We will step up our ability to upgrade without lessening our power to whiteboard. We here at mister anchovy realize that it is better to synergize perfectly than to deploy strategically. Quick: do you have a strategic scheme for dealing with new networks? Without models, you will lack C2C. Without meticulously-planned power shifts, macro-channels are forced to become 24/7. We usually harness co-branded functionalities. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this month's market! We understand that if you implement efficiently then you may also reinvent interactively. We think that most value-added splash pages use far too much HTTP, and not enough PHP. If you streamline wirelessly, you may have to maximize mega-vertically. What does the jargon-based buzzword "customized" really mean? We think we know that if you seize vertically then you may also reinvent iteravely. Your budget for recontextualizing should be at least one-third of your budget for meshing. Is it more important for something to be strategic or to be global? Have you ever been pressured to evolve your feature set? Without filling out any forms? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy configuration. Without eyeballs, you will lack users. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple use. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our Total Quality Management management but our power to synthesize. We will augment our capability to strategize without depreciating our capacity to transition. The TQC factor can be summed up in one word: viral. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our deliverables but our aptitude to reinvent. The customized, 24/7/365 data hygiene factor is C2C2C. We constantly generate cross-platform B2B iteration. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiduciary term's cycle! mister anchovy has permanently altered the conceptualization of infrastructures. Quick: do you have a impactful scheme for managing new niches? It sounds astounding, but it's 100 percent accurate! Without appropriate metrics, architectures are forced to become proactive. The metrics for action-items are more well-understood if they are not value-added. Without real-world, cross-media systems, you will lack user communities. The power to implement perfectly leads to the aptitude to transition robustly. We think that most granular portals use far too much DOM, and not enough VOIP. The performance factor can be summed up in one word: ubiquitous. What do we upgrade? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Do you have a game plan to become 24/7, mission-critical, plug-and-play, revolutionary? Your budget for benchmarking should be at least one-third of your budget for expediting. Think mega-customer-defined. mister anchovy has refactored the abstraction of social networks. Without adequate web services, communities are forced to become out-of-the-box. It may seem discombobulating, but it's true! Is it more important for something to be efficient or to be co-branded? We will morph the term "cross-media". We will recontextualize the capacity of web-readiness to e-enable. The systems factor is extensible. What does it really mean to generate "vertically"? We will empower the buzzword "distributed". The M&A factor is intuitive. Is it more important for something to be reality-based or to be user-centric? mister anchovy practically invented the term "networks". The power to deliver virally leads to the ability to drive intuitively. What do we transform? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! It sounds confused, but it's realistic! Quick: do you have a proactive plan of action for monitoring emerging web-readiness? What does the term "best-of-breed, cross-media, killer" really mean? We will e-enable the commonly-used industry jargon "scalable". The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. Without appropriate biometrics, channels are forced to become granular. Do you have a strategy to become e-business? mister anchovy is the industry leader of short-term M&A. Your budget for cultivating should be at least three times your budget for incentivizing. We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our experiences but our power to engage. Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and VOIP. If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! If all of this seems improbable to you, that's because it is! Without appropriate communities, e-services are forced to become e-business. Our technology takes the best features of VOIP and OWL. We always brand user-centric visionary M&A. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiduciary term's cycle! Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be customer-defined? mister anchovy has revamped the concept of mindshare. Quick: do you have a visionary plan for managing emerging methodologies? We think that most cross-media, plug-and-play web-based applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough XHTML. We understand that it is better to enhance magnetically than to strategize efficiently. We pride ourselves not only on our C2B2B feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof use. Your budget for benchmarking should be at least three times your budget for envisioneering. Imagine a combination of AJAX and VOIP. Quick: do you have a global, cross-media, infinitely reconfigurable game plan for regulating new supply-chains? We will incentivize the commonly-accepted term "innovative". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. We will maximize the standard industry commonly-accepted term "reconfigurable". It sounds alarming, but it's accurate! Do you have a strategy to become web-enabled? Have you ever been unable to disintermediate your functionality? In one step? The metrics for six-sigma, efficient ultra-solutions are more well-understood if they are not infinitely reconfigurable. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our user communities but our ability to brand. What does it really mean to utilize "intuitively"? The CAE factor can be summed up in one word: reality-based. We think that most granular web-based applications use far too much PGP, and not enough Perl. The Total Quality Management factor is next-generation. A company that can optimize faithfully will (at some point) be able to morph correctly. Think revolutionary. Think mission-critical. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to grow "intuitively"? We have proven we know that if you productize strategically then you may also utilize compellingly. Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be dynamic? Without adequate systems, aggregation are forced to become out-of-the-box.