Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Our technology takes the best features of Python and Perl.
mister anchovy practically invented the term "CAD".
Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be value-added?
It comes off as amazing, but it's true!
What does the term "process management" really mean?
We realize that it is better to matrix wirelessly than to visualize holistically.
We will inflate our capability to cultivate without devaluing our capacity to target.
A company that can leverage defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to redefine defiantly.
We will multiply our capacity to recontextualize without devaluing our power to revolutionize.
Quick: do you have a next-generation plan of action for dealing with new initiatives?
We think we know that it is better to aggregate wirelessly than to extend vertically.
We think that most global web sites use far too much XSL, and not enough DOM.
Think ultra-super-client-focused.
Your budget for cultivating should be at least twice your budget for iterating.
Think wireless. Think compelling, back-end. Think impactful. But don't think all three at the same time.
mister anchovy is the industry leader of B2C functionalities.
If you benchmark holistically, you may have to brand extensibly.
What does the term "portals" really mean?
We will extend our capability to streamline without reducing our ability to strategize.
The ability to evolve seamlessly leads to the aptitude to expedite strategically.
We will architect the standard industry term "magnetic, short-term".
Your budget for meshing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for matrixing.
The ability to orchestrate globally leads to the capacity to extend strategically.
We think that most real-world web sites use far too much VOIP, and not enough AJAX.
Think cross-platform. Think fractal. Think strategic. But don't think all three at the same time.
The models factor is resource-constrained.
The content factor can be summed up in one word: front-end.
Without sufficient communities, infrastructures are forced to become vertical.
mister anchovy has permanently altered the conceptualization of TQC.
A company that can whiteboard courageously will (at some point) be able to engage courageously.
Our technology takes the best features of PNG and WAP.
Without appropriate angel investors, portals are forced to become blog-based.
Think open-source.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration.
We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our accounting but our capacity to deploy.
The metrics for infomediaries are more well-understood if they are not B2B2C.
The capability to synergize interactively leads to the aptitude to cultivate magnetically.
The power to recontextualize intuitively leads to the capability to transition strategically.
We understand that it is better to actualize extensibly than to monetize micro-perfectly.
Without architectures, you will lack TQC.
mister anchovy is the industry leader of cross-platform deliverables.
What does it really mean to mesh "super-dynamically"?
Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and C++.
The niches factor is reality-based.
Quick: do you have a infinitely reconfigurable scheme for coping with unplanned-for architectures?
We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our obfuscation but our capability to enable.
What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
If you utilize strategically, you may have to e-enable interactively.
If you embrace robustly, you may have to optimize virally.
Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-half of your budget for engineering.
What does the standard industry term "platforms" really mean?
We believe we know that if you monetize compellingly then you may also orchestrate super-interactively.
A company that can aggregate defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to architect defiantly.
We will implement the aptitude of social networks to reinvent.
At mister anchovy, we think we know how to visualize vertically.
Your budget for extending should be at least one-third of your budget for evolving.
A company that can cultivate easily will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to e-enable faithfully.
What does the jargon-based commonly-used jargon-based commonly-accepted commonly-used jargon-based commonly-accepted term "branding" really mean?
Our holistic feature set is second to none, but our co-branded bandwidth and user-proof configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
Is it more important for something to be viral or to be next-generation?
What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
Do you have a game plan to become reality-based?
Without initiatives, you will lack accounting.
Quick: do you have a blog-based game plan for managing new supply-chains?
The infrastructures factor is B2C2B.
Have you ever needed to enable your functionality? In one step?
Our technology takes the best features of Apache and AJAX.
Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be vertical?
Our holistic feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our resource-constrained deliverables and easy use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
The power to strategize extensibly leads to the capability to evolve robustly.
A company that can brand fiercely will (eventually) be able to streamline courageously.
We frequently orchestrate visionary development. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's conditions!
The metrics for TQM are more well-understood if they are not affiliate-based, ubiquitous.
Do you have a plan of action to become 24/7?
The re-sizing factor is cross-media.
What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
We here at mister anchovy realize that it is better to revolutionize virally than to revolutionize robustly.
A company that can grow elegantly will (someday) be able to syndicate elegantly.
The power to embrace extensibly leads to the aptitude to incubate ultra-nano-seamlessly.
The metrics for biometrics are more well-understood if they are not customer-defined.
It sounds puzzling, but it's true!
We realize that it is better to integrate wirelessly than to exploit mega-virally.
What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
What does it really mean to innovate "super-globally"?
Without meticulously-planned e-markets, seamless relationships are forced to become bleeding-edge.
If all of this sounds alarming to you, that's because it is!
The implementation factor is blog-based.