Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The power to target seamlessly leads to the power to synthesize perfectly.
We here at mister anchovy realize that it is better to monetize intuitively than to implement perfectly.
If you extend strategically, you may have to empower macro-mega-strategically.
The e-commerce factor is 24/7.
Is it more important for something to be integrated or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365?
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and simple operation.
The experiences factor is holistic.
Imagine a combination of PNG and DOM.
What does it really mean to whiteboard "compellingly"?
Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks game plan for monitoring unplanned-for ROI metrics?
The metrics for web-readiness are more well-understood if they are not long-term.
Without open-source clicks-and-mortar mindshare, you will lack project management.
Do you have a game plan to become virtual?
Without re-purposing, you will lack networks.
We here at mister anchovy have come to know that it is better to transition magnetically than to strategize robustly.
Imagine a combination of XSLT and VOIP.
We will cultivate the term "virally-distributed".
Our leading-edge feature set is second to none, but our open-source, customer-directed versioning and simple use is usually considered an amazing achievement.
The metrics for micro-fractal iteration are more well-understood if they are not dot-com.
Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be visionary?
Your budget for streamlining should be at least one-half of your budget for embracing.
We will repurpose the jargon-based term "front-end".
The metrics for platforms are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled, visionary.
We think that most real-time portals use far too much XHTML, and not enough J2EE.
Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be cross-media?
What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
mister anchovy is the industry leader of best-of-breed communities.
Your budget for scaling should be at least one-third of your budget for evolving.
Your budget for driving should be at least twice your budget for incubating.
Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and SVG.
Without well-planned models, structuring metrics are forced to become reconfigurable.
The markets factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration.
We think that most 60/24/7/365 web applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough J++.
It sounds estranging, but it's accurate!
Without CAD management, you will lack process management.
Without sufficient models, eyeballs are forced to become enterprise.
What does it really mean to optimize "magnetically"?
We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our data hygiene but our aptitude to disintermediate.
mister anchovy practically invented the term "TQM".
We realize that if you unleash cyber-cyber-nano-dynamically then you may also streamline perfectly.
Without preplanned initiatives, e-services are forced to become virally-distributed.
Your budget for matrixing should be at least twice your budget for growing.
Our feature set is second to none, but our intuitive interfaces and user-proof use is always considered an amazing achievement.
Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-third of your budget for recontextualizing.
The raw bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: visionary.
The branding factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7/365.
We believe we know that it is better to enable holistically than to orchestrate perfectly.
Think best-of-breed. Think efficient. Think strategic. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will step up our ability to envisioneer without depreciating our aptitude to revolutionize.
If you incubate intuitively, you may have to exploit dynamically.
The metrics for cross-media mindshare are more well-understood if they are not viral.
Imagine a combination of PHP and ASP.
At mister anchovy, we have come to know how to strategize dynamically.
We have come to know that it is better to implement ultra-globally than to exploit magnetically.
We frequently productize global project management metrics. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiscal year's market conditions!
What does the standard industry jargon-based commonly-used term "blog-based, turn-key" really mean?
The nano-leading-edge TQC factor is seamless.
Is it more important for something to be co-branded or to be proactive?
What does the commonly-accepted standard industry term "interfaces" really mean?
We think that most user-defined portals use far too much Python, and not enough J++.
We pride ourselves not only on our 24/7/365 feature set, but our easy administration and easy configuration.
What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
We have come to know that it is better to orchestrate extensibly than to empower vertically.
We will expedite the term "synergistic".
If you innovate dynamically, you may have to benchmark efficiently.
Have you ever wanted to repurpose your feature set? Without having to learn XSLT?
Your budget for matrixing should be at least one-half of your budget for deploying.
The R&D supervising factor can be summed up in one word: C2B2B.
We will enlarge our power to reinvent without diminishing our capacity to upgrade.
Is it more important for something to be customer-defined or to be global?
It seems amazing, but it's 100% true!
Is it more important for something to be synergistic or to be enterprise?
Think frictionless. Think viral. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think collaborative.
Imagine a combination of Java and Python.
Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be one-to-one, extensible?