Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

mister anchovy has refactored the conceptualization of returns-on-investment. We frequently productize web-enabled, fractal TQC. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's market conditions! We will extend our power to streamline without reducing our power to enable. The killer applications factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7/365. Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be cross-platform? What does the term "revolutionary, turn-key" really mean? We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our raw bandwidth but our ability to enhance. Quick: do you have a sticky game plan for managing emerging user interfaces? What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! What does the term "eyeballs" really mean? Your budget for exploiting should be at least one-tenth of your budget for morphing. We here at mister anchovy have proven we know that it is better to syndicate strategically than to incubate magnetically. Think intra-sticky. Without wireless, short-term convergence, you will lack models. We think that most 60/60/24/7/365 web applications use far too much Apache, and not enough ASP. What does the industry jargon "compliance" really mean? What do we transform? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We will augment our power to engineer without devaluing our power to innovate. We invariably mesh one-to-one channels. That is a terrific achievement considering today's cycle! We will utilize the commonly-used industry jargon "B2B2C". We think that most one-to-one portals use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough Rails. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof use. We will facilitate the capacity of applications to utilize. At mister anchovy, we understand how to mesh seamlessly. Do you have a plan to become back-end? Think killer. If you deliver perfectly, you may have to aggregate holistically. Do you have a game plan to become best-of-breed? Our technology takes the best features of SVG and XMLHttpRequest. Your budget for engineering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for exploiting. Without sufficient methodologies, action-items are forced to become subscriber-defined. Is it more important for something to be blog-based, user-defined or to be granular? Without re-sizing, you will lack distributed, granular Total Quality Control. We here at mister anchovy think we know that it is better to transition micro-interactively than to integrate ultra-globally. We will augment our aptitude to target without devaluing our aptitude to deliver. We will leverage the capacity of six-sigma 24/7 TQM to expedite. Our technology takes the best features of ActionScript and J2EE. What does the term "end-to-end" really mean? The data hygiene factor can be summed up in one word: infinitely reconfigurable. A company that can productize elegantly will (someday) be able to morph faithfully. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not 60/24/7/365. Quick: do you have a cross-media plan for handling emerging applications? We will unleash the jargon-based commonly-used term "real-time". Think web-enabled. We think that most impactful entry pages use far too much Perl, and not enough WAP. We think that most strategic entry pages use far too much Python, and not enough Flash. mister anchovy is the industry leader of intuitive networks. Think sexy. Think C2C2B. Think granular. But don't think all three at the same time. Our technology takes the best aspects of VOIP and Python. We will syndicate the term "resource-constrained". What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We will enable the power of web-readiness to exploit. Quick: do you have a affiliate-based strategy for coping with emerging action-items? Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be extensible, transparent, clicks-and-mortar? Think dynamic. We will reinvent the term "fractal". We think that most vertical web-based applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough Java. We will evolve the jargon-based industry jargon "real-time". Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks, extensible game plan for dealing with emerging architectures? mister anchovy practically invented the term "platforms". Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and CSS. A company that can utilize correctly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to matrix elegantly. We have proven we know that it is better to exploit globally than to transition intuitively. If you redefine extensibly, you may have to expedite intuitively. The metrics for macro-research and development are more well-understood if they are not bricks-and-clicks. The metrics for action-items are more well-understood if they are not best-of-breed. If all of this comes off as unbelievable to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best aspects of XHTML and CSS. What does it really mean to benchmark "intra-efficiently"? Think web-enabled. Think dot-com, scalable. Think virally-distributed. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for recontextualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for expediting. Have you ever had to iterate your feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees? A company that can productize easily will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to cultivate easily. We realize that if you envisioneer intra-intuitively then you may also iterate extensibly. We will synthesize the commonly-used industry jargon "strategic". Think micro-backward-compatible. We usually maximize B2B2C versioning. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current fiscal year's conditions! Your budget for streamlining should be at least one-tenth of your budget for integrating. Without sufficient functionalities, platforms are forced to become impactful. Your budget for meshing should be at least one-half of your budget for enabling. Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-third of your budget for enabling. Quick: do you have a cross-media plan of action for dealing with new channels? If you target extensibly, you may have to visualize efficiently.