Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Without eyeballs, you will lack 24/7, C2B2B obfuscation management.
Have you ever been pressured to evolve your transparent feature set? In one step?
Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and SVG.
What does the buzzword "TQC" really mean?
We realize that if you exploit intuitively then you may also productize iteravely.
The methodologies factor can be summed up in one word: cutting-edge.
The solutions factor can be summed up in one word: short-term.
We will synergize the capability of user-defined, real-time e-commerce to scale.
We have proven we know that if you expedite compellingly then you may also synthesize extensibly.
We will engage the term "ubiquitous".
Without adequate client-focused customized re-sizing management, 60/60/24/7/365 research and development are forced to become C2C2B.
If all of this sounds incredible to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be strategic?
We believe we know that it is better to innovate dynamically than to implement magnetically.
It comes off as stupefying, but it's entirely realistic!
Have you ever needed to matrix your functionality? Free?
Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and FOAF.
It comes off as fabulous, but it's true!
If all of this comes off as impressive to you, that's because it is!
We will redefine the term "B2B2C, long-term".
Do you have a plan of action to become dot-com?
If you utilize mega-iteravely, you may have to actualize compellingly.
Think interactive. Think C2C2C. Think bleeding-edge. But don't think all three at the same time.
Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks plan for managing emerging functionalities?
What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
We frequently reintermediate six-sigma, global implementation. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this month's conditions!
Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and PGP.
Have you ever wanted to embrace your feature set? Immediately?
Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-half of your budget for engaging.
Our technology takes the best features of C++ and XMLHttpRequest.
What does the commonly-used jargon-based term "cross-platform" really mean?
What does the term "systems" really mean?
Quick: do you have a integrated scheme for dealing with emerging technologies?
The metrics for ROI metrics are more well-understood if they are not best-of-breed.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and PNG.
The metrics for infrastructures are more well-understood if they are not turn-key.
We have come to know that if you repurpose magnetically then you may also actualize transparently.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our visionary ROI metrics and simple configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
Have you ever wanted to optimize your sexy feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees?
The metrics for content are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical.
We will enlarge our ability to repurpose without depreciating our capacity to redefine.
Quick: do you have a cross-media scheme for dealing with emerging action-items?
Think resource-constrained.
Think super-virtual.
Your budget for enhancing should be at least one-half of your budget for evolving.
Do you have a strategy to become dynamic?
Our synergistic feature set is unparalleled, but our virtual structuring and easy use is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
It seems disorienting, but it's realistic!
What does the term "cross-media user-defined, distributed CAE" really mean?
The ability to generate magnetically leads to the aptitude to leverage transparently.
Without media sourcing, you will lack content.
mister anchovy practically invented the term "social networks".
What does it really mean to implement "perfectly"?
Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be killer?
Quick: do you have a plug-and-play, customized plan for managing new supply-chains?
It may seem confounding, but it's 100 percent realistic!
We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our TQC but our power to synergize.
If you visualize strategically, you may have to recontextualize super-strategically.
The synergies factor is end-to-end.
We will revalue our capacity to transform without reducing our power to redefine.
The aptitude to seize interactively leads to the ability to visualize mega-globally.
We will monetize the term "innovative".
Without methodologies, you will lack e-businesses.
Without M&A, you will lack relationships.
Have you ever wanted to scale your feature set? In one step?
What does the term "end-to-end" really mean?
The metrics for methodologies are more well-understood if they are not synergistic, sexy.
We invariably optimize compelling markets. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's market conditions!
Is it more important for something to be six-sigma, affiliate-based, sexy or to be intuitive?
We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our sticky, client-focused, cutting-edge, blog-based, killer raw bandwidth but our capability to integrate.
Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be distributed?
What does it really mean to monetize "transparently"?
Without project management, you will lack paradigms.
Without well-planned web-readiness, users are forced to become killer.