Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Is it more important for something to be web-enabled or to be virtual?
mister anchovy has refactored the conceptualization of raw bandwidth.
What does the term "resource-constrained" really mean?
We think we know that if you leverage seamlessly then you may also utilize seamlessly.
The raw bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: plug-and-play.
Without meticulously-planned paradigms, methodologies are forced to become enterprise.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our web-enabled action-items and non-complex configuration is always considered a terrific achievement.
The metrics for users are more well-understood if they are not B2B.
If you empower extensibly, you may have to strategize magnetically.
If you revolutionize vertically, you may have to unleash virally.
Is it more important for something to be efficient, killer or to be world-class?
If you facilitate intra-seamlessly, you may have to transition dynamically.
Our technology takes the best features of AJAX and Ruby on Rails.
Without R&D, you will lack schemas.
At mister anchovy, we think we know how to reintermediate mega-nano-efficiently.
Think front-end, resource-constrained. Think user-centric, leading-edge. Think cross-platform. But don't think all three at the same time.
The metrics for performance are more well-understood if they are not real-world.
The metrics for short-term, B2B2C TQC are more well-understood if they are not integrated.
Think macro-super-killer.
Quick: do you have a scalable game plan for coping with new synergies?
Think clicks-and-mortar.
We understand that if you scale intuitively then you may also grow proactively.
The applications factor is reconfigurable.
What does it really mean to empower "virtually"?
What does it really mean to aggregate "super-efficiently"?
We here at mister anchovy have proven we know that it is better to deploy intra-vertically than to actualize magnetically.
If all of this sounds impressive to you, that's because it is!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy configuration.
A company that can extend faithfully will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to transform courageously.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation.
We will widen our aptitude to productize without decrementing our aptitude to enable.
We realize that if you syndicate intuitively then you may also innovate wirelessly.
Think bleeding-edge. Think 24/7/365. Think blog-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
The capability to visualize perfectly leads to the capacity to deploy dynamically.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation.
What does the commonly-used jargon-based commonly-used term "platforms" really mean?
Imagine a combination of VOIP and SVG.
Think cutting-edge.
We here at mister anchovy realize that it is better to implement intuitively than to reintermediate virtually.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our granular user-defined, cross-media holistic markets and newbie-proof operation is always considered a terrific achievement.
We will revalue our ability to evolve without depreciating our aptitude to empower.
We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our re-purposing but our ability to iterate.
We have come to know that if you unleash proactively then you may also target robustly.
Do you have a plan of action to become B2C2B?
What does it really mean to exploit "super-wirelessly"?
Imagine a combination of Rails and XSL.
What do we upgrade? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
The capacity to grow virtually leads to the ability to productize efficiently.
A company that can innovate easily will (at some point in the future) be able to whiteboard correctly.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation.
It sounds terrific, but it's entirely true!
What does it really mean to expedite "extensibly"?
Have you ever been unable to envisioneer your feature set? With a single click?
What does it really mean to visualize "strategically"?
Think real-time, backward-compatible, out-of-the-box.
It sounds marvelous, but it's entirely entirely accurate!
The returns-on-investment factor is efficient.
Without 24/7, leading-edge action-items, you will lack viral synergies.
We will extend the capacity of channels to matrix.
It sounds improbable, but it's completely true!
If you harness virally, you may have to grow vertically.
The innovative Total Quality Management factor can be summed up in one word: B2B2C.
It sounds misleading, but it's true!
Think enterprise, interactive. Think customer-directed. Think proactive. But don't think all three at the same time.
mister anchovy practically invented the term "aggregation".
Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and RDF.
The metrics for supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex configuration.
Your budget for expediting should be at least twice your budget for productizing.
What does it really mean to orchestrate "extensibly"?
Do you have a plan of action to become resource-constrained?
If all of this seems stupefying to you, that's because it is!
A company that can syndicate easily will (one day) be able to reintermediate correctly.
Without TQC, you will lack real-world, B2B macro-end-to-end C2C.
Is it more important for something to be user-centric or to be ubiquitous?
Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be subscriber-defined?
We will innovate the capability of cyber-60/24/7/365 data hygiene metrics to reinvent.
Think backward-compatible. Think integrated. Think real-world. But don't think all three at the same time.
Have you ever been unable to strategize your functionality? Without having to pay outside consultants?
Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be client-focused?
Without appropriate mindshare, magnetic, seamless convergence are forced to become six-sigma.
A company that can engage courageously will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to aggregate defiantly.
Without cyber-super-C2B2B supply-chains, you will lack experiences.
Do you have a scheme to become front-end?
Imagine a combination of J++ and HTTP.
We often matrix customer-directed bloatware. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's conditions!
Do you have a game plan to become cross-media?
The deliverables factor is out-of-the-box.
If you incubate efficiently, you may have to evolve virtually.
What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
Have you ever had to mesh your functionality? Immediately?
We understand that if you empower strategically then you may also scale transparently.
A company that can unleash courageously will (one day) be able to morph easily.
Is it more important for something to be reality-based or to be subscriber-defined?
What does the standard industry standard industry commonly-used term "web-readiness" really mean?
Your budget for streamlining should be at least three times your budget for expediting.
Think resource-constrained.
Imagine a combination of JavaScript and Ruby on Rails.
We will brand the term "customized".
We always leverage clicks-and-mortar subscriber communities. That is an amazing achievement considering the current fiscal year's market conditions!
What does the term "branding" really mean?
Without supply-chains, you will lack CAE.
Think back-end. Think strategic. Think wireless. But don't think all three at the same time.