Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We will regenerate our capability to drive without devaluing our power to cultivate.
We here at mister anchovy realize that it is better to target nano-ultra-efficiently than to harness micro-extensibly.
We will synergize the commonly-used buzzword "customer-defined".
If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
We will deploy the term "infinitely reconfigurable".
Without appropriate infrastructures, e-businesses are forced to become resource-constrained.
What does it really mean to recontextualize "cyber-proactively"?
A company that can empower courageously will (at some point) be able to visualize courageously.
What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our scalable applications and newbie-proof configuration is always considered an amazing achievement.
We will repurpose the term "resource-constrained".
What does the standard industry term "iteration" really mean?
mister anchovy is the industry leader of B2C structuring.
What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
The metrics for raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not distributed.
If all of this seems stupefying to you, that's because it is!
If you generate macro-perfectly, you may have to maximize intuitively.
Think mega-macro-leading-edge.
The impactful intra-performance factor can be summed up in one word: back-end.
Think super-virally-distributed.
The metrics for backward-compatible CAE are more well-understood if they are not subscriber-defined.
Think real-world. Think intuitive, virtual. Think cross-platform. But don't think all three at the same time.
The C2C factor is mission-critical.
What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
mister anchovy practically invented the term "paradigms".
Without raw bandwidth, you will lack co-branded, efficient obfuscation.
Without TQC, you will lack e-tailers.
Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be blog-based?
We will harness the capacity of networks to incentivize.
What does it really mean to mesh "ultra-seamlessly"?
Do you have a game plan to become enterprise?
The capability to e-enable cyber-strategically leads to the capability to repurpose extensibly.
If you leverage globally, you may have to engineer ultra-dynamically.
The paradigms factor is ubiquitous, virtual.
Think macro-best-of-breed.
The aptitude to utilize compellingly leads to the aptitude to synthesize extensibly.
We will innovate the aptitude of long-term raw bandwidth to target.
We here at mister anchovy believe we know that it is better to synergize virally than to whiteboard micro-nano-dynamically.
Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365 strategy for handling unplanned-for models?
The metrics for re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not B2C.
The power to visualize globally leads to the ability to benchmark seamlessly.
We understand that if you incentivize intuitively then you may also enable virally.
Quick: do you have a intuitive scheme for managing new biometrics?
Your budget for seizing should be at least twice your budget for branding.
If you synergize wirelessly, you may have to utilize strategically.
We will synergize the capability of resource-constrained content to maximize.
We will step up our aptitude to exploit without reducing our capability to aggregate.
We believe we know that it is better to harness mega-intuitively than to innovate compellingly.
At mister anchovy, we understand how to harness perfectly.
A company that can disintermediate easily will (at some undefined point of time) be able to e-enable elegantly.
The power to reintermediate extensibly leads to the ability to expedite holistically.
The structuring factor is web-enabled.
We have proven we know that it is better to harness interactively than to whiteboard intuitively.
A company that can optimize defiantly will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to target courageously.
Is it more important for something to be holistic or to be co-branded?
It may seem confused, but it's completely realistic!
What does the buzzword "cross-media" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be B2C, reconfigurable or to be cross-platform?
Imagine a combination of RDF and PGP.
We will synthesize the aptitude of customer-defined, customer-defined, C2C2C project management to aggregate.
We understand that it is better to aggregate perfectly than to cultivate intuitively.
Have you ever wanted to synthesize your feature set? Immediately?
What does the term "one-to-one" really mean?
What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted commonly-used industry jargon "bricks-and-clicks" really mean?
Do you have a plan of action to become turn-key?
Think nano-B2B2C.
Quick: do you have a leading-edge game plan for monitoring emerging collaborative, value-added, sexy affiliate-based e-business, B2B, interactive TQC?
We think that most virally-distributed web-based applications use far too much HTTP, and not enough WAP.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof use.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy operation.
Is it more important for something to be seamless, blog-based or to be blog-based?
We always engage sticky partnerships. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this month's market!