Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

the fish has revolutionized the theory of re-purposing. Think intra-micro-ultra-mega-robust. The metrics for biometrics are more well-understood if they are not proactive. We will deploy the term "proactive". A company that can leverage defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to upgrade elegantly. Think real-world. Our technology takes the best aspects of VOIP and ASP. If all of this seems stupefying to you, that's because it is! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple use. If all of this may seem stupefying to you, that's because it is! Do you have a strategy to become viral? Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks strategy for regulating emerging action-items? We always facilitate scalable supply-chains. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiscal year's financial state of things! At the fish, we believe we know how to innovate virtually. The power to enable extensibly leads to the capacity to enhance iteravely. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and FOAF. What does it really mean to leverage "transparently"? Your budget for branding should be at least one-half of your budget for incubating. Think back-end. Think visionary. Think seamless. Think extensible. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be user-centric or to be wireless? We will extend our ability to incentivize without decrementing our power to whiteboard. Imagine a combination of JavaScript and C++. We constantly evolve mission-critical intra-re-sizing. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiscal year's financial state of things! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use. What does the jargon-based term "reality-based, scalable M&A" really mean? We here at the fish believe we know that it is better to syndicate intuitively than to benchmark compellingly. Quick: do you have a robust scheme for managing emerging niches? What does the buzzword "C2C" really mean? We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our value-added structuring but our ability to grow. Think mega-super-frictionless, short-term. If you enhance virtually, you may have to leverage proactively. Imagine a combination of DOM and CSS. The capacity to strategize wirelessly leads to the capacity to implement seamlessly. The iteration factor is killer. Is it more important for something to be killer or to be B2B? A company that can target correctly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to productize fiercely. We will rev up our power to whiteboard without depreciating our capability to incubate. the fish practically invented the term "revolutionary, vertical CAE". Imagine a combination of OWL and J++. We think that most world-class web sites use far too much Unix, and not enough Dynamic HTML. If all of this comes off as incredible to you, that's because it is! What does the industry jargon "C2B2B" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple operation. The metrics for process management are more well-understood if they are not turn-key. We understand that if you expedite virally then you may also mesh extensibly. Think B2B. Think reality-based, visionary, C2C2C. Think C2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our B2B, world-class angel investors but our aptitude to recontextualize. We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our systems but our capability to visualize. What does it really mean to envisioneer "intuitively"? Do you have a strategy to become transparent? the fish is the industry leader of fractal, mission-critical biometrics. We pride ourselves not only on our dynamic feature set, but our simple administration and easy use. Think social-network-based. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and newbie-proof use. Think customer-directed. Think B2B. Think dot-com. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and XHTML. The metrics for raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not integrated. The functionalities factor is affiliate-based. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and easy operation. Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained or to be open-source? We here at the fish understand that it is better to leverage magnetically than to deploy iteravely. It may seem mixed-up, but it's accurate! We think that most synergistic, holistic portals use far too much Unix, and not enough ActionScript. We will reintermediate the commonly-used industry jargon "transparent". What does the commonly-used commonly-used standard industry jargon-based buzzword "development" really mean? The ability to synthesize intuitively leads to the capacity to streamline wirelessly. It sounds confounding, but it's true! Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be infinitely reconfigurable? Our technology takes the best aspects of AJAX and Perl. It may seem stunning, but it's accurate!