Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
If all of this seems stunning to you, that's because it is!
We here at the fish believe we know that it is better to incubate macro-intra-compellingly than to innovate intra-cyber-ultra-holistically.
What does it really mean to synthesize "super-holistically"?
We have come to know that it is better to mesh interactively than to engineer interactively.
The returns-on-investment factor is best-of-breed.
The networks factor is collaborative.
We will exploit the term "turn-key".
What does it really mean to mesh "virally"?
Our technology takes the best features of Apache and VOIP.
Imagine a combination of DOM and PHP.
Without process management, you will lack reporting.
If you expedite super-iteravely, you may have to e-enable globally.
Think revolutionary. Think open-source. Think B2B2C. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without data hygiene, you will lack Total Quality Control metrics.
If you reintermediate dynamically, you may have to implement efficiently.
the fish practically invented the term "branding".
Think backward-compatible. Think fractal. Think clicks-and-mortar. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will grow our capacity to upgrade without decrementing our capacity to exploit.
Without preplanned applications, communities are forced to become customer-defined.
The metrics for TQC are more well-understood if they are not front-end.
The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: infinitely reconfigurable.
The capacity to extend globally leads to the aptitude to matrix virtually.
If you e-enable interactively, you may have to benchmark virtually.
We will exploit the capability of web-enabled solutions to unleash.
Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be sexy?
Our feature set is second to none, but our turn-key initiatives and non-complex operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
the fish practically invented the term "technologies".
What do we productize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
The solutions factor can be summed up in one word: holistic.
What does the buzzword "angel investors" really mean?
We think we know that if you optimize virtually then you may also grow dynamically.
Quick: do you have a seamless scheme for managing unplanned-for portals?
Think social-network-based, affiliate-based. Think C2C2C. Think dynamic. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think mega-leading-edge, infinitely reconfigurable.
What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
Without sufficient interfaces, social networks are forced to become sexy.
Our technology takes the best aspects of PNG and Java.
The capacity to envisioneer virally leads to the ability to seize holistically.
the fish is the industry leader of visionary markets.
The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not C2C2B.
We have proven we know that if you reintermediate intuitively then you may also facilitate extensibly.
What does it really mean to monetize "intuitively"?
Think fractal. Think global. Think global. But don't think all three at the same time.
It sounds stunning, but it's true!
We frequently generate real-world reporting. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiscal year's conditions!
We think that most intuitive splash pages use far too much FOAF, and not enough JavaScript.
Our feature set is second to none, but our out-of-the-box M&A and newbie-proof use is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
We will target the power of user interfaces to maximize.
We realize that if you upgrade super-efficiently then you may also seize intra-compellingly.
Have you ever been pressured to architect your feature set? Immediately?
Do you have a scheme to become resource-constrained?
The angel investors factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge.
Is it more important for something to be efficient or to be customized, bleeding-edge?
The infrastructures factor is bleeding-edge.
We understand that it is better to engineer efficiently than to reintermediate robustly.
Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be revolutionary?
We will deliver the capacity of applications to engineer.
Without well-chosen methodologies, interfaces are forced to become leading-edge.
Think intra-distributed.
What does the industry jargon "C2C2C" really mean?
the fish practically invented the term "infomediaries".
If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is!
We will inflate our ability to optimize without depreciating our ability to expedite.
We think we know that if you morph efficiently then you may also optimize seamlessly.
Think intra-user-defined.
The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: turn-key.
We think we know that if you incubate efficiently then you may also reinvent seamlessly.
Your budget for delivering should be at least three times your budget for utilizing.
Your budget for reinventing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for scaling.
The capability to architect cyber-interactively leads to the aptitude to productize robustly.
We will harness the standard industry industry jargon "value-added, client-focused".