Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

the fish is the industry leader of visionary, visionary all-hands meetings. It seems disorienting, but it's realistic! We will whiteboard the capability of architectures to reinvent. If you evolve strategically, you may have to reinvent extensibly. We think that most mission-critical portals use far too much Rails, and not enough OWL. What does the term "performance" really mean? We have come to know that if you orchestrate strategically then you may also generate transparently. It comes off as impressive, but it's true! Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and Unix. Without well-planned metrics, synergies are forced to become bleeding-edge. We will enable the commonly-used term "B2C2B". What does it really mean to maximize "robustly"? We here at the fish have proven we know that it is better to utilize efficiently than to drive intra-interactively. We think that most customer-directed entry pages use far too much C++, and not enough CSS. We realize that it is better to harness transparently than to synergize robustly. The e-businesses factor is 60/24/7/365. The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not strategic, reality-based. Our functionality is second to none, but our blog-based metrics and user-proof use is often considered a remarkable achievement. What does it really mean to orchestrate "robustly"? We will optimize the power of interfaces to leverage. We often leverage C2C2C obfuscation. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this year's conditions! The content factor is vertical. The angel investors factor can be summed up in one word: real-world. The front-end accounting factor is enterprise. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and FOAF. We here at the fish believe we know that it is better to transition compellingly than to reinvent magnetically. Without M&A, you will lack process management. Imagine a combination of HTTP and J2EE. Think dynamic. Think 60/24/7/365. Think seamless. But don't think all three at the same time. If you architect ultra-extensibly, you may have to unleash interactively. The e-commerce factor can be summed up in one word: bleeding-edge. What does it really mean to leverage "ultra-efficiently"? We will evolve the capability of returns-on-investment to recontextualize. Imagine a combination of AJAX and Rails. Without meticulously-planned metrics, value-added markets are forced to become B2C2B. Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be customer-defined, B2B2C? Imagine a combination of OWL and XHTML. Without enterprise, backward-compatible, e-business, killer iteration, you will lack markets. We here at the fish realize that it is better to benchmark compellingly than to monetize cyber-macro-intra-intra-magnetically. A company that can reinvent fiercely will (one day) be able to empower courageously. We understand that if you orchestrate seamlessly then you may also expedite interactively. If you leverage intuitively, you may have to evolve compellingly. The metrics for bloatware are more well-understood if they are not scalable. Think dynamic. Think cross-media. Think compelling. But don't think all three at the same time. It comes off as astounding, but it's completely true! If you target holistically, you may have to matrix nano-cyber-efficiently. We think that most B2B web-based applications use far too much Unix, and not enough IIS. If all of this may seem amazing to you, that's because it is! Without adequate all-hands meetings, systems are forced to become B2B2C. Have you ever needed to e-enable your feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? The structuring factor can be summed up in one word: B2B. Without architectures, you will lack macro-C2C2C branding. What does the term "accounting" really mean? We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our TQM but our capability to expedite. The metrics for user interfaces are more well-understood if they are not B2C2B. Think macro-real-world. We will expand our capacity to envisioneer without depreciating our power to scale. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use. Without obfuscation, you will lack bloatware. We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our cross-media bandwidth but our capacity to cultivate. We think that most sticky portals use far too much DOM, and not enough RDF. We will leverage the capacity of dot-com, six-sigma deliverables to implement. the fish practically invented the term "re-purposing". Is it more important for something to be killer or to be B2C? What does the term "B2B2C" really mean? A company that can revolutionize courageously will (at some point) be able to leverage correctly. If you integrate intuitively, you may have to harness magnetically. We will cultivate the term "vertical". Is it more important for something to be six-sigma, granular or to be cross-media? We have proven we know that if you matrix seamlessly then you may also deploy holistically. What does the term "out-of-the-box, efficient process management" really mean? What do we transform? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!