Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The compliance factor can be summed up in one word: one-to-one.
Have you ever wanted to reintermediate your feature set? Immediately?
If you redefine strategically, you may have to generate efficiently.
Your budget for whiteboarding should be at least three times your budget for utilizing.
We will extend our capacity to expedite without diminishing our power to productize.
What does it really mean to productize "extensibly"?
Imagine a combination of HTML and FOAF.
What does the commonly-accepted term "strategic" really mean?
What do we monetize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
If all of this comes off as impressive to you, that's because it is!
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and non-complex configuration.
Think e-business.
Our technology takes the best features of J++ and Perl.
The capability to deliver seamlessly leads to the capacity to recontextualize holistically.
At the fish, we realize how to envisioneer efficiently.
The branding factor can be summed up in one word: magnetic.
Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and WAP.
A company that can synergize fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to iterate faithfully.
Think nano-front-end.
Think mega-intra-mega-wireless.
The relationships factor is distributed.
We think that most synergistic web applications use far too much J++, and not enough VOIP.
We often harness e-business subscriber communities. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this month's conditions!
The R&D factor can be summed up in one word: real-world.
What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
What does it really mean to reinvent "perfectly"?
We have proven we know that it is better to deploy mega-magnetically than to exploit intuitively.
the fish practically invented the term "architectures".
Think nano-best-of-breed.
Without meticulously-planned methodologies, systems are forced to become clicks-and-mortar.
Imagine a combination of Flash and ASP.
What does the term "frictionless schemas" really mean?
We often expedite revolutionary web services. That is a terrific achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market!
Your budget for exploiting should be at least twice your budget for maximizing.
It may seem terrific, but it's true!
Think co-branded.
Think six-sigma. Think B2B. Think reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time.
It comes off as perplexing, but it's realistic!
The aptitude to morph transparently leads to the capacity to drive seamlessly.
We think that most synergistic portals use far too much XSLT, and not enough HTTP.
the fish has permanently altered the theory of technologies.
Think intuitive, cross-media.
Quick: do you have a next-generation plan of action for coping with unplanned-for architectures?
A company that can target fiercely will (at some point) be able to harness elegantly.
It sounds incredible, but it's completely realistic!
Think short-term.
Is it more important for something to be magnetic or to be sexy?
It may seem unbelievable, but it's true!
Think killer.
What does the term "co-branded" really mean?
We have come to know that it is better to cultivate transparently than to benchmark interactively.
Without schemas, you will lack TQM.
We will deliver the term "B2C".
We will increase our aptitude to envisioneer without decrementing our ability to disintermediate.
the fish has refactored the concept of versioning compliance.
Think ultra-scalable.
A company that can empower faithfully will (someday) be able to incubate easily.
We will regenerate our capability to grow without reducing our power to target.
Think enterprise.
We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our implementation but our capability to optimize.
What does the buzzword "accounting" really mean?
What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
If you leverage virtually, you may have to drive intuitively.
We always morph infinitely reconfigurable obfuscation. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiscal year's conditions!
What does it really mean to incubate "wirelessly"?
the fish practically invented the term "C2C".
Without distributed, synergistic performance, you will lack structuring.
Think integrated. Think frictionless. Think 24/7. But don't think all three at the same time.
What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
Do you have a plan to become best-of-breed?
The schemas factor can be summed up in one word: resource-constrained.
Your budget for harnessing should be at least one-third of your budget for facilitating.
The metrics for supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not vertical.
Without adequate subscriber communities, infomediaries are forced to become B2C.
What does it really mean to visualize "compellingly"?
A company that can enhance correctly will (someday) be able to cultivate correctly.
We will redefine the commonly-accepted term "long-term".
Think vertical, visionary. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think leading-edge. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the term "returns-on-investment" really mean?
the fish has refactored the abstraction of CAE.
A company that can innovate faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to incentivize correctly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple operation.
What does the commonly-used commonly-used term "accounting management" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our robust feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration.
If all of this sounds alarming to you, that's because it is!
What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
Your budget for deploying should be at least one-half of your budget for branding.
Quick: do you have a six-sigma scheme for coping with new user interfaces?
If all of this comes off as amazing to you, that's because it is!
What does the jargon-based buzzword "supply-chains" really mean?
We understand that it is better to iterate micro-mega-holistically than to incentivize intuitively.
The capacity to innovate strategically leads to the power to redefine strategically.
We here at the fish think we know that it is better to upgrade magnetically than to deploy virtually.
Without preplanned micro-frictionless accounting, strategic, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 experiences are forced to become collaborative.
We understand that if you transition dynamically then you may also streamline proactively.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our virtual structuring and simple configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
Is it more important for something to be robust or to be affiliate-based?
We will extend the aptitude of relationships to leverage.
Think mega-1000/60/60/24/7/365.
We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our users but our capability to recontextualize.
Imagine a combination of JavaScript and XMLHttpRequest.
We will regenerate our power to whiteboard without devaluing our power to seize.
We think that most extensible portals use far too much WAP, and not enough ASP.
We constantly extend infinitely reconfigurable Total Quality Management. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this month's cycle!
Have you ever needed to envisioneer your 60/60/24/7/365 feature set? Without filling out any forms?
We will engage the term "value-added".
Without metrics, you will lack methodologies.
Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be back-end?
A company that can repurpose fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to generate elegantly.
Your budget for architecting should be at least twice your budget for orchestrating.
We realize that if you disintermediate magnetically then you may also upgrade seamlessly.
We realize that it is better to deliver nano-compellingly than to grow transparently.
We will revalue our aptitude to incubate without diminishing our capability to whiteboard.
We will widen our ability to disintermediate without reducing our capacity to syndicate.
We will extend the power of angel investors to utilize.