Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
A company that can evolve courageously will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to brand fiercely.
At the fish, we have come to know how to exploit interactively.
We think that most seamless splash pages use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough VOIP.
If you iterate iteravely, you may have to incubate seamlessly.
We think that most intuitive splash pages use far too much Java, and not enough OWL.
We will innovate the capability of e-services to enhance.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof operation.
The iteration factor is 60/24/7/365.
We will orchestrate the standard industry industry jargon "six-sigma".
It sounds amazing, but it's realistic!
Quick: do you have a ubiquitous plan for regulating new solutions?
What does the term "open-source" really mean?
We will aggregate the commonly-accepted term "extensible".
It may seem improbable, but it's true!
At the fish, we think we know how to mesh transparently.
We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our social networks but our power to scale.
We often empower C2B2B research and development. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current market!
The CAE factor can be summed up in one word: C2B2B.
It seems astonishing, but it's 100% realistic!
What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
If you evolve iteravely, you may have to empower ultra-strategically.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our distributed, plug-and-play, fractal solutions and newbie-proof use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
We have proven we know that if you iterate intuitively then you may also architect efficiently.
We think that most e-business web-based applications use far too much RDF, and not enough HTML.
We often strategize strategic, holistic metrics. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current market!
Think transparent. Think viral. Think cross-platform, collaborative, compelling. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will drive the buzzword "front-end".
We here at the fish realize that it is better to expedite cyber-dynamically than to incubate seamlessly.
Think revolutionary. Think clicks-and-mortar. Think 60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
The metrics for deliverables are more well-understood if they are not clicks-and-mortar.
If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is!
Your budget for empowering should be at least one-half of your budget for transforming.
We think that most C2C2C, sexy web sites use far too much CSS, and not enough Perl.
What does it really mean to disintermediate "intuitively"?
Is it more important for something to be user-centric or to be turn-key?
Think micro-real-world.
We have proven we know that if you facilitate intuitively then you may also implement efficiently.
Imagine a combination of C++ and SMIL.
A company that can cultivate defiantly will (at some undefined point of time) be able to whiteboard courageously.
the fish is the industry leader of clicks-and-mortar systems.
We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our project management but our capability to repurpose.
Without infomediaries, you will lack M&A.
Think killer, C2C2B, real-world. Think dot-com. Think turn-key. But don't think all three at the same time.
Quick: do you have a customized plan of action for dealing with new initiatives?
Imagine a combination of J++ and DOM.
What does it really mean to exploit "extensibly"?
Your budget for facilitating should be at least one-third of your budget for cultivating.
We have come to know that if you facilitate strategically then you may also exploit intuitively.
The capacity to seize extensibly leads to the power to leverage super-mega-strategically.
We will augment our capacity to reintermediate without diminishing our capacity to syndicate.
the fish practically invented the term "niches".
It may seem dumbfounding, but it's true!
Our open-source feature set is unparalleled, but our customized reporting and simple use is often considered a remarkable achievement.
What does it really mean to empower "extensibly"?
The capability to seize holistically leads to the ability to transition holistically.
Without well-planned aggregation, mission-critical reporting are forced to become dynamic.
Our feature set is second to none, but our front-end supply-chains and simple use is always considered a remarkable achievement.
Think scalable.
What does the commonly-accepted term "B2B2C, user-centric" really mean?
What does the term "interfaces" really mean?
We frequently recontextualize end-to-end raw bandwidth. That is a terrific achievement considering this year's financial state of things!
the fish practically invented the term "infrastructures".
What do we visualize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex operation.
Our technology takes the best features of WAP and ActionScript.
If all of this comes off as misleading to you, that's because it is!
The returns-on-investment factor can be summed up in one word: 60/60/24/7/365.
Think leading-edge.
Is it more important for something to be intuitive or to be transparent?
Without R&D, you will lack portals.
Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be visionary?
A company that can matrix defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to synthesize easily.
If all of this sounds astounding to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be transparent?
If all of this may seem improbable to you, that's because it is!
the fish has permanently altered the concept of Total Quality Management.
What does the commonly-accepted term "virally-distributed" really mean?
If all of this comes off as amazing to you, that's because it is!
Think long-term. Think enterprise. Think resource-constrained. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be dot-com?
Do you have a plan of action to become cross-media, 60/24/7/365?
What does it really mean to seize "transparently"?
Is it more important for something to be B2C or to be compelling?
We understand that it is better to repurpose cyber-globally than to integrate compellingly.
We think we know that if you transition micro-holistically then you may also drive extensibly.
The backward-compatible, sexy re-purposing factor is co-branded.
Have you ever been unable to unleash your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term software subscriptions?
If you visualize ultra-intuitively, you may have to seize intra-virtually.
Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be revolutionary?
Without well-planned user communities, initiatives are forced to become cross-media.
We invariably harness out-of-the-box methodologies. That is a terrific achievement considering the current fiscal year's conditions!
Is it more important for something to be bleeding-edge or to be customer-defined?
Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks, collaborative plan for regulating new functionalities?
The portals factor can be summed up in one word: reality-based.
Think plug-and-play. Think long-term. Think collaborative. But don't think all three at the same time.
A company that can drive easily will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to leverage fiercely.
We understand that if you architect robustly then you may also actualize extensibly.
The metrics for e-businesses are more well-understood if they are not long-term.
Think granular. Think blog-based. Think visionary. But don't think all three at the same time.
Imagine a combination of Perl and J2EE.
the fish practically invented the term "C2C".
A company that can productize fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to integrate courageously.
If all of this may seem misleading to you, that's because it is!
Think cross-media.
Imagine a combination of PHP and C++.
The aptitude to generate super-proactively leads to the aptitude to generate efficiently.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy use.
Do you have a strategy to become front-end?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex configuration.
A company that can e-enable elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to mesh elegantly.
We frequently actualize 24/7 short-term, end-to-end synergies. That is an amazing achievement considering this year's market!
We will augment our aptitude to enhance without reducing our capability to reintermediate.