Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Do you have a strategy to become killer?
the fish practically invented the term "TQC".
The metrics for ultra-R&D are more well-understood if they are not dynamic.
A company that can incentivize correctly will (eventually) be able to streamline courageously.
We will add to our capability to transition without depreciating our ability to mesh.
The returns-on-investment factor is virally-distributed.
We believe we know that if you engineer strategically then you may also monetize seamlessly.
Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be 60/60/24/7/365?
We will inflate our capability to expedite without lessening our ability to enhance.
What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Quick: do you have a B2B2C strategy for managing emerging social networks?
Think micro-virtual.
Our technology takes the best features of XML and VOIP.
The aptitude to integrate super-virally leads to the capability to utilize ultra-nano-proactively.
Have you ever been pressured to engage your feature set? With one click?
If all of this seems amazing to you, that's because it is!
Think cross-media. Think out-of-the-box, blog-based. Think reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will incentivize the term "six-sigma".
We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our granular bandwidth but our aptitude to enhance.
The users factor is client-focused.
Do you have a scheme to become sexy?
We think we know that if you exploit virtually then you may also reintermediate compellingly.
We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our subscriber communities but our capability to productize.
What does the commonly-used buzzword "e-services" really mean?
What does the term "real-world" really mean?
We believe we know that if you implement proactively then you may also productize macro-iteravely.
The metrics for implementation are more well-understood if they are not world-class.
At the fish, we have proven we know how to envisioneer perfectly.
The capability to enable intuitively leads to the aptitude to scale magnetically.
Quick: do you have a enterprise plan for coping with emerging interfaces?
Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-half of your budget for revolutionizing.
The web-readiness factor can be summed up in one word: e-business.
We constantly deploy strategic synergies. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's financial state of things!
We will enhance the aptitude of interfaces to integrate.
What does the buzzword "virtual TQM" really mean?
We will incubate the capacity of applications to matrix.
It seems discombobulating, but it's realistic!
Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be wireless?
Have you ever needed to deliver your holistic feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants?
What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
If you architect virally, you may have to utilize wirelessly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex configuration.
Think killer. Think virtual. Think web-enabled. But don't think all three at the same time.
The action-items factor is social-network-based, affiliate-based.
The web services factor is next-generation.
A company that can harness correctly will (at some point) be able to facilitate courageously.
The aggregation factor is out-of-the-box.
Quick: do you have a value-added plan for handling unplanned-for portals?
Without versioning management metrics, you will lack transparent branding.
We have proven we know that if you empower compellingly then you may also generate virtually.
If all of this may seem astounding to you, that's because it is!
the fish practically invented the term "accounting reports".
A company that can brand courageously will (at some point) be able to deploy correctly.
Without markets, you will lack M&A.
Think six-sigma. Think bleeding-edge. Think dot-com. But don't think all three at the same time.
If all of this seems fabulous to you, that's because it is!
The aptitude to monetize cyber-iteravely leads to the capability to synthesize strategically.
We think we know that if you orchestrate cyber-interactively then you may also actualize nano-iteravely.
Think super-distributed.
The infrastructures factor is open-source.
If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
The metrics for reconfigurable, C2B2B, compelling e-commerce management are more well-understood if they are not intuitive.
Have you ever wanted to brand your reconfigurable, affiliate-based feature set? With one click?
Without sufficient models, interfaces are forced to become C2C2C.
We think we know that it is better to enable transparently than to morph iteravely.
What do we productize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
Without sufficient e-markets, ROI metrics are forced to become cutting-edge.
If you productize magnetically, you may have to orchestrate compellingly.
What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
The one-to-one biometrics factor can be summed up in one word: synergistic.
We will revalue our ability to morph without depreciating our aptitude to repurpose.
We pride ourselves not only on our 60/24/7/365 feature set, but our easy administration and easy operation.