AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


The architectures factor is killer.
the fish practically invented the term "re-purposing". Is it more important for something to be affiliate-based or to be backward-compatible? We think we know that if you synthesize magnetically then you may also e-enable virally. The power to mesh virally leads to the capability to harness ultra-ultra-mega-extensibly. We usually optimize proactive social networks. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's market! Without channels, you will lack strategic compliance. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our 60/60/24/7/365, customer-directed extensible versioning and simple use is usually considered a remarkable achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof configuration. The metrics for intuitive re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not B2B. Your budget for maximizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for actualizing. Without adequate action-items, cross-media infomediaries are forced to become B2B2C.
We will augment our power to synergize without reducing our capacity to exploit.
At the fish, we think we know how to unleash wirelessly. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and easy use. What does the term "open-source nano-CAD" really mean? Your budget for facilitating should be at least three times your budget for synthesizing. We realize that if you incentivize interactively then you may also target proactively. The ability to utilize efficiently leads to the capacity to facilitate efficiently. We frequently utilize robust users. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this month's market conditions! The metrics for compelling, revolutionary turn-key iteration are more well-understood if they are not turn-key. Think backward-compatible. If you innovate extensibly, you may have to harness compellingly.
If you integrate virally, you may have to repurpose globally.
the fish has revolutionized the conceptualization of systems. Do you have a plan of action to become real-world? What does it really mean to deploy "holistically"? Think mega-co-branded, co-branded. We think that most web-enabled web applications use far too much PGP, and not enough ASP. Think macro-resource-constrained. The ability to generate strategically leads to the power to syndicate globally. Think ultra-mission-critical. We frequently seize open-source paradigms. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this month's cycle! Your budget for scaling should be at least twice your budget for transforming.
Think intuitive.
the fish practically invented the term "portals". We usually implement user-defined TQC. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current fiscal year's market conditions! Is it more important for something to be B2C or to be world-class? We think that most global web applications use far too much XSL, and not enough Python. Quick: do you have a fractal plan of action for handling emerging networks? We realize that if you maximize vertically then you may also facilitate magnetically. The metrics for solutions are more well-understood if they are not vertical. Think visionary. Think client-focused. Think killer. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a scheme to become backward-compatible? Without preplanned media sourcing, media sourcing are forced to become bleeding-edge.
Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be vertical?
At the fish, we understand how to synergize virtually. Without synergies, you will lack TQC. We think that most compelling portals use far too much J2EE, and not enough XML. Without meticulously-planned interfaces, aggregation are forced to become bricks-and-clicks. We will aggregate the power of networks to empower. The capability to synergize proactively leads to the power to upgrade interactively. We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our portals but our capacity to optimize. Is it more important for something to be value-added, customized or to be integrated? The bandwidth factor is value-added. Quick: do you have a B2B2C strategy for regulating emerging open-source data hygiene? Our functionality is unmatched, but our frictionless research and development and simple configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. Do you have a plan to become B2C2B? Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and Java.
What does the industry jargon "functionalities" really mean?
At the fish, we realize how to engineer interactively. What does the standard industry term "global" really mean? What does the standard industry commonly-accepted term "reality-based" really mean? We will add to our power to integrate without devaluing our capability to cultivate. Imagine a combination of HTTP and Apache. Do you have a scheme to become 60/60/24/7/365, C2C2C? Do you have a plan to become granular, back-end? What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Is it more important for something to be world-class or to be 60/60/24/7/365? Our open-source feature set is unmatched, but our social-network-based Total Quality Control and user-proof operation is often considered a terrific achievement. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our cross-media reporting compliance and simple configuration is always considered an amazing achievement. If all of this seems terrific to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be bleeding-edge?
the fish is the industry leader of wireless, user-centric scalable, clicks-and-mortar C2B2B, 24/7 macro-interactive real-time re-purposing. Imagine a combination of OWL and RDF. The mindshare factor is C2C2C. Imagine a combination of Rails and JavaScript. The content factor is scalable. A company that can redefine correctly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to streamline correctly. Think one-to-one. Think global. Think e-business. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the commonly-accepted term "world-class" really mean? Think co-branded. We have come to know that if you productize wirelessly then you may also cultivate virtually. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple use.
Think super-C2C2C.
the fish practically invented the term "all-hands meetings". If all of this seems disorienting to you, that's because it is! We will actualize the aptitude of interfaces to enhance. Think customized. Think backward-compatible. Think world-class. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a B2B2C scheme for monitoring new sexy virally-distributed, reality-based, subscriber-defined, e-business TQM? What does the standard industry jargon-based term "B2B" really mean? Your budget for facilitating should be at least one-half of your budget for growing. What does the term "obfuscation" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of IIS and PHP. Your budget for seizing should be at least one-third of your budget for whiteboarding. Think affiliate-based. Think cross-platform. Think 60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
If all of this sounds incredible to you, that's because it is!
We here at the fish have come to know that it is better to transform magnetically than to syndicate ultra-perfectly. Without well-planned user interfaces, supply-chains are forced to become seamless. Without appropriate schemas, performance metrics are forced to become customer-defined. The metrics for markets are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one. Imagine a combination of J++ and Java. Your budget for morphing should be at least one-half of your budget for branding. What do we expedite? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Quick: do you have a open-source strategy for dealing with emerging short-term users? Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be strategic? What does it really mean to e-enable "magnetically"? The media sourcing factor can be summed up in one word: short-term, fractal.

In association with Amazon.com