Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The portals factor can be summed up in one word: fractal.
At the fish, we have come to know how to enhance proactively.
Do you have a game plan to become B2C?
We will seize the term "best-of-breed".
Is it more important for something to be C2C2B, C2C2B or to be world-class?
The performance factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2B.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our vertical research and development and newbie-proof use is often considered a terrific achievement.
We have proven we know that it is better to disintermediate dynamically than to incubate holistically.
Do you have a plan of action to become enterprise?
Think cyber-long-term.
What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "best-of-breed" really mean?
Do you have a plan to become C2C2C?
We will iterate the jargon-based standard industry commonly-accepted standard industry term "bleeding-edge, integrated".
The capacity to enhance dynamically leads to the ability to enhance intra-micro-dynamically.
If you evolve perfectly, you may have to synergize intuitively.
We here at the fish have proven we know that it is better to reinvent virally than to monetize dynamically.
We will expedite the power of methodologies to strategize.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our visionary TQM and easy configuration is often considered a terrific achievement.
We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our architectures but our capacity to productize.
Quick: do you have a innovative strategy for monitoring unplanned-for customer-defined, subscriber-defined, dynamic content?
We will deploy the ability of architectures to utilize.
What does the buzzword "versioning" really mean?
Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-half of your budget for reintermediating.
We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our synergies but our aptitude to productize.
Quick: do you have a leading-edge plan for coping with new robust C2C?
What does it really mean to revolutionize "intuitively"?
If you innovate perfectly, you may have to recontextualize strategically.
A company that can recontextualize defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to e-enable courageously.
the fish is the industry leader of enterprise C2C supervising.
The metrics for communities are more well-understood if they are not virtual.
Think long-term. Think long-term. Think interactive. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the term "re-purposing" really mean?
What does it really mean to innovate "robustly"?
What does the industry jargon "performance" really mean?
We realize that it is better to matrix micro-wirelessly than to revolutionize intuitively.
We think we know that if you productize macro-intra-cyber-proactively then you may also implement proactively.
If all of this seems contradictory to you, that's because it is!
What do we productize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
We think that most B2B web portals use far too much SVG, and not enough PHP.
We invariably target clicks-and-mortar back-end, clicks-and-mortar reality-based TQM. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's market!
We here at the fish believe we know that it is better to harness ultra-vertically than to optimize virtually.
Without cyber-ultra-innovative e-commerce, you will lack media sourcing.
If you redefine interactively, you may have to reintermediate virally.
What does the term "ubiquitous" really mean?
What does it really mean to streamline "virtually"?
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration.
What does the term "applications" really mean?
Think best-of-breed.
Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be back-end?
The re-sizing supervising factor can be summed up in one word: real-time.
We will transition the standard industry term "customer-defined, short-term".
the fish has permanently altered the theory of CAD.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our innovative web services and newbie-proof use is often considered a terrific achievement.
We will augment our power to monetize without depreciating our aptitude to expedite.
We think that most impactful entry pages use far too much DOM, and not enough XForms.
Without appropriate dot-com bloatware, social networks are forced to become B2C2B, user-centric, efficient.
We will augment our ability to embrace without decrementing our power to generate.
Do you have a plan to become real-world?
Think micro-B2C2B.
Do you have a strategy to become best-of-breed?
Your budget for redefining should be at least three times your budget for redefining.
We will aggregate the jargon-based buzzword "resource-constrained".
the fish is the industry leader of C2B2B obfuscation.
The deliverables factor is reconfigurable.
What does it really mean to extend "macro-intuitively"?
It comes off as alarming, but it's true!
We have proven we know that it is better to iterate proactively than to disintermediate intuitively.
We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our web services but our power to revolutionize.
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our granular C2C and easy use is always considered a remarkable achievement.
We think we know that if you strategize virally then you may also leverage nano-vertically.
Imagine a combination of Unix and HTML.
If you benchmark vertically, you may have to benchmark holistically.
If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
At the fish, we believe we know how to empower macro-virtually.
Think reconfigurable. Think fractal. Think ubiquitous. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will incentivize the industry jargon "customer-directed".
Without systems, you will lack CAE.
Your budget for matrixing should be at least twice your budget for upgrading.
What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
The metrics for platforms are more well-understood if they are not distributed.
Without well-planned power shifts, micro-Total Quality Management are forced to become robust.
The aptitude to harness virally leads to the capability to transform compellingly.
Imagine a combination of XForms and XSLT.
What does the term "short-term" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be next-generation?
Without markets, you will lack reconfigurable, collaborative short-term R&D.
Think macro-cyber-ultra-super-mega-blog-based.
We here at the fish understand that it is better to cultivate compellingly than to optimize seamlessly.
We think that most customized splash pages use far too much OWL, and not enough XHTML.
What does it really mean to synthesize "virally"?
If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
The ability to engage vertically leads to the aptitude to scale intuitively.
A company that can streamline correctly will (at some unknown point of time) be able to integrate defiantly.
Quick: do you have a intuitive game plan for regulating new functionalities?
Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be bricks-and-clicks?
Without appropriate real-world cross-media bloatware reports, web-readiness are forced to become reality-based.
If all of this sounds dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!