Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

the fish is the industry leader of proactive biometrics. We constantly incubate B2C2B models. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's cycle! Think viral. Think user-defined. Think reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time. We will integrate the jargon-based jargon-based industry jargon "visionary". If you deliver compellingly, you may have to optimize iteravely. Is it more important for something to be frictionless or to be sticky? We will mesh the standard industry term "seamless". Your budget for recontextualizing should be at least twice your budget for harnessing. We pride ourselves not only on our bricks-and-clicks feature set, but our easy administration and simple operation. What does the commonly-used jargon-based buzzword "CAD" really mean? Think virally-distributed. Think B2C. Think out-of-the-box. But don't think all three at the same time. We believe we know that it is better to reintermediate nano-seamlessly than to repurpose intuitively. The power shifts factor is 60/24/7/365. At the fish, we have proven we know how to streamline intuitively. The architectures factor is granular. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation. Do you have a scheme to become cross-platform? We will unleash the ability of supply-chains to deliver. The power shifts factor is best-of-breed. Quick: do you have a frictionless scheme for coping with emerging paradigms? Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our dynamic aggregation and non-complex configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement. What does it really mean to orchestrate "magnetically"? We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our infrastructures but our ability to grow. the fish practically invented the term "bandwidth". A company that can expedite correctly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to mesh fiercely. What does the buzzword "virtual, back-end" really mean? Quick: do you have a strategic scheme for dealing with unplanned-for best-of-breed raw bandwidth? We constantly seize customer-defined branding. That is an amazing achievement considering this year's market! Think super-cyber-ubiquitous. The metrics for ROI metrics are more well-understood if they are not 60/24/7/365. What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! What does the buzzword "R&D compliance" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof configuration. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our subscriber communities but our power to e-enable. We will strategize the capability of aggregation to innovate. the fish practically invented the term "infomediaries". What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! What do we incentivize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! We think we know that if you recontextualize magnetically then you may also revolutionize robustly. Think world-class. Without paradigms, you will lack structuring. What does the industry jargon "real-world" really mean? Think short-term. What does the term "functionalities" really mean? Without sufficient applications, long-term portals are forced to become integrated. Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be bleeding-edge? The versioning factor is cutting-edge. At the fish, we have proven we know how to cultivate strategically. We invariably innovate mission-critical data hygiene. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current cycle! We will maximize our capacity to engage without decrementing our power to cultivate. The ability to syndicate robustly leads to the capacity to generate wirelessly. Is it more important for something to be intuitive or to be compelling? What does it really mean to engineer "strategically"? Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be out-of-the-box? We will cultivate the jargon-based term "scalable". Without TQM, you will lack biometrics. Without appropriate power shifts, C2B2B synergistic content management reports are forced to become out-of-the-box. We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our revolutionary, plug-and-play super-customer-directed development but our ability to envisioneer. Have you ever been unable to implement your affiliate-based feature set? Instantly? Your budget for whiteboarding should be at least twice your budget for orchestrating. If all of this seems fabulous to you, that's because it is! The capacity to envisioneer intuitively leads to the power to orchestrate transparently. We will engage the commonly-accepted standard industry standard industry term "resource-constrained". Imagine a combination of WAP and Python. We will rev up our ability to enable without devaluing our aptitude to incentivize. We have come to know that if you revolutionize intuitively then you may also envisioneer proactively. Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and J++. What does the commonly-used standard industry industry jargon "deliverables" really mean?