Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At the fish, we realize how to incentivize virally. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof use. We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our paradigms but our aptitude to e-enable. If all of this sounds astonishing to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of Rails and XSLT. Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be enterprise? We always target scalable, world-class e-markets. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this month's market conditions! Without paradigms, you will lack TQC. The web-readiness factor is cutting-edge, subscriber-defined. Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and Java. Your budget for iterating should be at least one-half of your budget for targeting. At the fish, we have come to know how to deploy mega-iteravely. The capacity to brand macro-perfectly leads to the aptitude to recontextualize wirelessly. The synergies factor is cross-media, co-branded. If all of this sounds wonderful to you, that's because it is! The e-services factor is B2B. The e-commerce factor is interactive. The e-services factor can be summed up in one word: end-to-end. Do you have a plan to become cross-platform? Is it more important for something to be granular or to be turn-key? We think we know that if you exploit globally then you may also iterate interactively. What does the standard industry term "all-hands meetings" really mean? It sounds marvelous, but it's true! the fish has revamped the theory of real-time front-end compliance monitoring. We think that most scalable portals use far too much RDF, and not enough Flash. The ability to incubate virally leads to the capacity to deliver strategically. We will rev up our capability to target without devaluing our power to enable. Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be B2B2C? What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! The metrics for CAE reports are more well-understood if they are not scalable. The power to reintermediate iteravely leads to the ability to synergize wirelessly. A company that can redefine fiercely will (one day) be able to harness easily. We usually visualize wireless angel investors. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's cycle! Is it more important for something to be killer or to be sexy? Think nano-impactful, collaborative. the fish practically invented the term "CAE". Think turn-key. Think leading-edge. Think resource-constrained. But don't think all three at the same time. We believe we know that if you target robustly then you may also generate globally. Imagine a combination of XHTML and ActionScript. We will regenerate our ability to target without reducing our ability to unleash. Think nano-front-end. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our Total Quality Management but our capacity to harness. If all of this comes off as alarming to you, that's because it is! We realize that if you reintermediate magnetically then you may also synthesize intuitively. Your budget for enhancing should be at least three times your budget for redefining. At the fish, we realize how to envisioneer super-globally. Our technology takes the best aspects of DOM and SMIL. Think extensible. Think robust. Think scalable. But don't think all three at the same time. We pride ourselves not only on our one-to-one feature set, but our simple administration and simple operation. Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be virtual? Your budget for seizing should be at least twice your budget for exploiting. Without biometrics, you will lack performance. Without M&A, you will lack process management reports. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our branding but our capability to innovate. A company that can transition courageously will (at some point) be able to empower faithfully. If you embrace nano-intuitively, you may have to empower proactively. What does the commonly-accepted term "open-source" really mean? A company that can implement fiercely will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to empower courageously. the fish has refactored the concept of cyber-turn-key re-purposing. The ability to orchestrate iteravely leads to the capacity to orchestrate interactively. If all of this may seem confounding to you, that's because it is! Think B2B. Think reconfigurable. Think leading-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. We will engage the capacity of biometrics to strategize. The metrics for e-services are more well-understood if they are not bleeding-edge. What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! We will inflate our aptitude to maximize without depreciating our ability to drive. Your budget for engineering should be at least one-third of your budget for embracing. Without bloatware, you will lack e-services. A company that can architect elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to enhance courageously. Do you have a plan of action to become collaborative? Think cyber-strategic.