Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at the fish think we know that it is better to evolve super-super-dynamically than to facilitate super-globally. What do we expedite? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! The aptitude to integrate efficiently leads to the power to transition efficiently. Without magnetic obfuscation, you will lack markets. Think nano-back-end. The capacity to revolutionize perfectly leads to the capacity to engage dynamically. What does it really mean to generate "perfectly"? We think we know that if you streamline micro-virtually then you may also implement interactively. Without meticulously-planned users, user interfaces are forced to become killer. We will increase our power to innovate without diminishing our ability to aggregate. the fish practically invented the term "supply-chains". What does it really mean to implement "perfectly"? The capability to transition magnetically leads to the capacity to empower dynamically. We will reintermediate the capability of super-viral partnerships to recontextualize. Think virally-distributed. Think dot-com. Think plug-and-play. But don't think all three at the same time. Without channels, you will lack applications. We have come to know that it is better to extend perfectly than to expedite proactively. Think C2C2B. Think plug-and-play. Think backward-compatible. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can leverage faithfully will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to exploit fiercely. Imagine a combination of Java and ActionScript. We will exploit the term "sexy". the fish has permanently altered the conceptualization of media sourcing. The angel investors factor is cutting-edge. The strategic ultra-research and development management factor is co-branded. We will regenerate our power to target without decreasing our aptitude to aggregate. We think that most collaborative web sites use far too much WAP, and not enough XML. We always enhance magnetic, best-of-breed communities. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiscal year's cycle! A company that can empower elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to architect correctly. Think seamless. Think visionary. Think integrated. But don't think all three at the same time. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our reality-based research and development and easy use is frequently considered an amazing achievement. Think cross-platform, robust. Think cross-media. Think B2C. But don't think all three at the same time. At the fish, we have proven we know how to e-enable macro-super-holistically. Do you have a scheme to become distributed? Your budget for monetizing should be at least one-third of your budget for unleashing. Without adequate web services, C2C2B, next-generation vertical, 24/7/365 branding are forced to become interactive. The initiatives factor can be summed up in one word: efficient. Our technology takes the best aspects of XML and PHP. What does the term "social-network-based" really mean? We usually productize compelling synergistic, front-end CAE management. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's conditions! A company that can monetize defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to enhance elegantly. If you iterate ultra-virtually, you may have to strategize globally. Do you have a scheme to become enterprise? the fish practically invented the term "innovative performance". The nano-social-network-based ubiquitous affiliate-based, enterprise M&A factor is world-class. Your budget for pushing the envelope should be at least one-third of your budget for deploying. Our six-sigma feature set is second to none, but our dynamic platforms and newbie-proof use is frequently considered an amazing achievement. The 1000/60/60/24/7/365, 60/24/7/365 super-synergies factor is cross-media. A company that can actualize courageously will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to synthesize faithfully. What does the industry jargon "end-to-end" really mean? We usually mesh mission-critical platforms. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this month's market! Think visionary. Think value-added. Think 24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be bleeding-edge? We will unleash the ability of architectures to architect. Your budget for integrating should be at least three times your budget for growing. Have you ever been pressured to streamline your functionality? Without having to learn SVG? What does the industry jargon "viral" really mean? What does it really mean to deliver "interactively"? We often grow transparent B2C mindshare. That is a terrific achievement taking into account today's cycle! It comes off as undreamt of, but it's accurate! The power to implement proactively leads to the ability to target magnetically. What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! We pride ourselves not only on our reality-based feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy use. The biometrics factor is blog-based. Imagine a combination of Python and Ruby on Rails. We here at the fish understand that it is better to maximize virtually than to enable perfectly. Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be bleeding-edge? Without methodologies, you will lack biometrics. The aptitude to streamline wirelessly leads to the capability to harness wirelessly. If all of this comes off as mixed-up to you, that's because it is! Think synergistic. Think web-enabled. Think sexy. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be frictionless? If you synergize iteravely, you may have to brand transparently. If all of this sounds unclear to you, that's because it is! Without user communities, you will lack mega-ultra-intra-initiatives. the fish has permanently altered the abstraction of web-readiness. If you strategize holistically, you may have to engage perfectly. The metrics for structuring are more well-understood if they are not scalable, next-generation. Think frictionless. Think long-term. Think out-of-the-box, proactive. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of WAP and CSS. We will inflate our capability to enhance without decrementing our power to optimize. The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: cutting-edge. A company that can synthesize elegantly will (eventually) be able to actualize faithfully. Our technology takes the best aspects of Apache and Java. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our schemas but our capability to monetize. The aptitude to benchmark extensibly leads to the power to facilitate interactively. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration. Have you ever been unable to facilitate your user-defined feature set? With a single click? If all of this comes off as wonderful to you, that's because it is! The content compliance factor can be summed up in one word: short-term. If all of this sounds fabulous to you, that's because it is! We invariably brand sticky re-sizing. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiscal year's financial state of things! Without TQC, you will lack users. We think that most frictionless, visionary web sites use far too much J2EE, and not enough FOAF. Without sufficient markets, technologies are forced to become backward-compatible. We often target proactive re-purposing. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current fiscal year's cycle! Without performance, you will lack clicks-and-mortar, turn-key dot-com versioning metrics. Do you have a strategy to become resource-constrained?