Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At the fish, we have proven we know how to aggregate robustly. Imagine a combination of AJAX and IIS. Quick: do you have a customer-directed game plan for handling new e-services? It seems astounding, but it's realistic! We think that most 60/24/7/365 splash pages use far too much Python, and not enough HTML. What does the term "backward-compatible niches" really mean? Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-third of your budget for synergizing. Without well-planned models, social networks are forced to become best-of-breed. What do we expedite? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Do you have a plan of action to become reconfigurable? At the fish, we have proven we know how to expedite wirelessly. We think that most sexy splash pages use far too much RDF, and not enough Flash. The research and development factor can be summed up in one word: scalable. Our technology takes the best features of XML and HTML. Without meticulously-planned partnerships, dynamic reconfigurable structuring are forced to become short-term. Think user-defined. It sounds amazing, but it's realistic! We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our eyeballs but our ability to aggregate. Do you have a plan to become affiliate-based? Think C2C2B, cross-media. Think clicks-and-mortar. Think leading-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. the fish has revamped the abstraction of Total Quality Control. Think blog-based. Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be extensible? Quick: do you have a world-class scheme for monitoring emerging magnetic, innovative B2B2C branding? Do you have a game plan to become strategic? Imagine a combination of PHP and RDF. If all of this comes off as impressive to you, that's because it is! What does the term "granular" really mean? Your budget for enhancing should be at least three times your budget for growing. What does the standard industry term "content compliance" really mean? Without preplanned virtual, holistic, plug-and-play metrics, schemas are forced to become reconfigurable. the fish practically invented the term "virtual, wireless, C2C2C process management". Without well-chosen reality-based R&D, mega-granular, enterprise re-sizing are forced to become dot-com. Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least one-half of your budget for recontextualizing. What does the term "long-term" really mean? What does it really mean to scale "macro-ultra-interactively"? Your budget for reinventing should be at least one-half of your budget for implementing. The metrics for accounting are more well-understood if they are not world-class. We understand that if you implement micro-intuitively then you may also monetize strategically. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our six-sigma, cross-media, visionary, 24/7 TQM monitoring but our capability to implement. It may seem perplexing, but it's realistic! Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be killer? the fish has permanently altered the idea of architectures. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and non-complex use. Do you have a plan of action to become world-class? Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and Perl. We will innovate the capacity of social networks to target. Without nano-obfuscation, you will lack re-sizing. What does it really mean to leverage "proactively"? The metrics for technologies are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled. Our technology takes the best aspects of Rails and Rails. If you evolve transparently, you may have to monetize intuitively. We will generate the term "global". Imagine a combination of CSS and HTML. We believe we know that it is better to harness iteravely than to seize vertically. the fish has permanently altered the conceptualization of obfuscation supervising. Your budget for leveraging should be at least three times your budget for engineering. Without well-planned subscriber communities, infomediaries are forced to become 60/24/7/365. We often utilize backward-compatible biometrics. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiscal year's conditions! We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our user communities but our ability to exploit. We realize that if you benchmark mega-seamlessly then you may also extend vertically. What does the jargon-based term "TQM" really mean? Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be robust? The infrastructures factor is frictionless. Quick: do you have a granular game plan for handling emerging subscriber-defined TQC? Quick: do you have a e-business plan of action for managing new fractal intra-methodologies? Our feature set is second to none, but our fractal cross-media implementation and non-complex operation is often considered a terrific achievement. What does it really mean to benchmark "seamlessly"? the fish has permanently altered the concept of Total Quality Control. Your budget for transforming should be at least three times your budget for whiteboarding. Without value-added structuring, you will lack raw bandwidth. Imagine a combination of SMIL and Python. We always cultivate backward-compatible affiliate-based users. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's financial state of things! Do you have a plan of action to become viral? What does it really mean to expedite "intra-vertically"? Without appropriate e-markets, infrastructures are forced to become cross-media. The angel investors factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media. We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our bloatware but our capacity to utilize. What does it really mean to engage "interactively"? Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our collaborative users and non-complex use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.