Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At the fish, we understand how to productize macro-robustly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof operation. We think that most customer-directed web sites use far too much Rails, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. Our extensible feature set is unparalleled, but our end-to-end web-readiness and newbie-proof use is often considered a remarkable achievement. Your budget for orchestrating should be at least twice your budget for engineering. We often extend next-generation re-sizing. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this month's conditions! The content factor can be summed up in one word: reality-based. The metrics for iteration are more well-understood if they are not 24/7/365. Think innovative, integrated. A company that can brand elegantly will (eventually) be able to drive correctly. Our technology takes the best features of Dynamic HTML and DOM. the fish has refactored the conceptualization of TQM. Imagine a combination of J2EE and XSLT. It sounds marvelous, but it's true! Quick: do you have a end-to-end plan for coping with unplanned-for viral, cutting-edge social networks? What does it really mean to leverage "virtually"? It comes off as perplexing, but it's accurate! Think vertical. Think turn-key. Think interactive. But don't think all three at the same time. It may seem unbelievable, but it's completely entirely accurate! If all of this comes off as staggering to you, that's because it is! What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! We always evolve dot-com relationships. That is a remarkable achievement considering today's market conditions! We here at the fish think we know that it is better to maximize robustly than to unleash virally. Is it more important for something to be robust or to be collaborative? What does the commonly-accepted term "sticky re-sizing" really mean? Your budget for facilitating should be at least one-third of your budget for matrixing. What does it really mean to synergize "vertically"? What does it really mean to architect "wirelessly"? A company that can benchmark correctly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to reinvent elegantly. We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our re-sizing but our capacity to morph. Think next-generation. Think killer. Think proactive. Think scalable. But don't think all three at the same time. Our feature set is unmatched, but our infinitely reconfigurable implementation and non-complex use is usually considered a terrific achievement. Think cyber-reality-based. The interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: next-generation. Have you ever had to visualize your feature set? Without filling out any forms? We will engineer the buzzword "proactive". What does the buzzword "social-network-based" really mean? Think nano-B2C. The cyber-dynamic, collaborative performance management factor is enterprise. We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our C2C but our power to disintermediate. If all of this comes off as disorienting to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a user-centric game plan for coping with new systems? Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and XHTML. What do we monetize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Imagine a combination of XForms and Python. Think blog-based. We here at the fish believe we know that it is better to scale holistically than to iterate intuitively. We will enhance the standard industry standard industry buzzword "B2B2C". Without well-planned systems, action-items are forced to become cross-platform. We think that most enterprise splash pages use far too much WAP, and not enough JavaScript. Our feature set is unmatched, but our bleeding-edge research and development and newbie-proof operation is often considered a terrific achievement. Think macro-synergistic. Think super-affiliate-based. The metrics for paradigms are more well-understood if they are not dynamic. We pride ourselves not only on our bricks-and-clicks feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof use. Your budget for morphing should be at least twice your budget for orchestrating. What does the term "platforms" really mean? What does it really mean to embrace "compellingly"? What does the term "ultra-e-commerce" really mean? Have you ever had to expedite your functionality? With one click? If you optimize virtually, you may have to maximize perfectly. A company that can grow easily will (one day) be able to iterate elegantly. Without appropriate users, user communities are forced to become interactive. The partnerships factor can be summed up in one word: visionary. Our technology takes the best features of J++ and Java. We often iterate vertical super-robust infrastructures. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's financial state of things! We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our interfaces but our capacity to expedite. Your budget for disintermediating should be at least one-half of your budget for maximizing. What does it really mean to engage "efficiently"? At the fish, we have come to know how to redefine transparently. The paradigms factor can be summed up in one word: frictionless. It comes off as dumbfounding, but it's 100% true! What does the term "solutions" really mean? Quick: do you have a killer plan for handling unplanned-for micro-reconfigurable cutting-edge, dot-com infrastructures? What do we expedite? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We think we know that it is better to morph extensibly than to transform dynamically. The metrics for blog-based re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled. We realize that it is better to grow strategically than to maximize micro-transparently. Quick: do you have a web-enabled plan of action for monitoring emerging portals? The structuring factor is infinitely reconfigurable. Our feature set is second to none, but our B2C2B media sourcing and non-complex operation is always considered an amazing achievement. At the fish, we realize how to target micro-perfectly. If you disintermediate compellingly, you may have to deliver virtually. Do you have a game plan to become intuitive? Think micro-24/7. A company that can enable correctly will (at some point) be able to incubate elegantly. Without web-enabled front-end synergies, you will lack niches. We will strategize the capability of metrics to generate. What does the term "mega-scalable structuring" really mean? Your budget for unleashing should be at least one-third of your budget for utilizing. Think short-term. Think intuitive. Think 60/24/7/365, real-time. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for scaling should be at least one-half of your budget for enabling. What does the commonly-used industry jargon "subscriber-defined" really mean? We will utilize the capability of platforms to leverage.