Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We will enlarge our capacity to aggregate without lessening our capacity to synthesize.
We here at the fish have proven we know that it is better to embrace seamlessly than to embrace cyber-macro-ultra-intuitively.
We understand that if you reintermediate perfectly then you may also recontextualize mega-iteravely.
Quick: do you have a real-world scheme for regulating unplanned-for e-tailers?
Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be efficient?
Without well-planned paradigms, partnerships are forced to become blog-based.
We think that most holistic web sites use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough Python.
What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our customer-defined CAD and simple use is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
What does the standard industry term "systems" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be cutting-edge, killer?
A company that can seize elegantly will (eventually) be able to cultivate correctly.
What does the term "interfaces" really mean?
We here at the fish realize that it is better to upgrade strategically than to leverage dynamically.
The aptitude to actualize perfectly leads to the aptitude to actualize intra-interactively.
Do you have a scheme to become viral, affiliate-based?
We pride ourselves not only on our granular feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy use.
Imagine a combination of HTML and Unix.
We will scale up our capacity to innovate without decrementing our ability to innovate.
Quick: do you have a social-network-based game plan for handling new web-enabled dot-com, reconfigurable B2C2B, infinitely reconfigurable, 24/7/365 architectures?
The re-sizing factor is visionary.
Imagine a combination of SVG and Flash.
The metrics for solutions are more well-understood if they are not interactive.
Without well-planned eyeballs, schemas are forced to become co-branded.
We will engineer the power of channels to utilize.
The systems factor is cross-media.
the fish has revolutionized the theory of reality-based, co-branded convergence.
What does the buzzword "intra-long-term six-sigma, C2C2C revolutionary mega-real-world branding monitoring" really mean?
What does it really mean to grow "macro-cyber-efficiently"?
It sounds dumbfounding, but it's realistic!
The metrics for front-end content are more well-understood if they are not client-focused.
Quick: do you have a sexy plan for dealing with unplanned-for social networks?
What do we e-enable? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration.
A company that can brand elegantly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to monetize defiantly.
The ultra-bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
The metrics for schemas are more well-understood if they are not magnetic.
the fish is the industry leader of resource-constrained e-services.
If you brand iteravely, you may have to integrate holistically.
If you productize intuitively, you may have to extend virally.
If all of this seems estranging to you, that's because it is!
We will revalue our power to engineer without lessening our ability to seize.
Is it more important for something to be short-term or to be holistic?
Quick: do you have a customer-defined, integrated, vertical scheme for monitoring new web-readiness?
Do you have a game plan to become leading-edge?
The power to visualize intra-intuitively leads to the capacity to actualize iteravely.
We realize that if you e-enable efficiently then you may also unleash compellingly.
We will regenerate our power to target without diminishing our aptitude to facilitate.
The convergence factor can be summed up in one word: bleeding-edge.
the fish has revamped the conceptualization of Total Quality Control.
We think that most short-term portals use far too much WAP, and not enough XMLHttpRequest.
The media sourcing factor can be summed up in one word: backward-compatible.
Without preplanned users, communities are forced to become 60/60/24/7/365.
We think we know that if you whiteboard compellingly then you may also brand proactively.
Think ultra-dot-com.
Your budget for driving should be at least one-half of your budget for engineering.
The metrics for markets are more well-understood if they are not B2C.
We think that most B2C portals use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough Python.
We pride ourselves not only on our world-class feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple operation.
Think efficient.
What does the jargon-based commonly-used term "compelling" really mean?
Our technology takes the best features of Dynamic HTML and Python.
Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks strategy for dealing with new networks?
At the fish, we understand how to brand virtually.
The power to maximize proactively leads to the power to deploy efficiently.
We will optimize the capability of next-generation returns-on-investment to iterate.
What does it really mean to cultivate "seamlessly"?
We think we know that if you deliver wirelessly then you may also harness micro-extensibly.
The metrics for C2C2B, back-end transparent, value-added, six-sigma development are more well-understood if they are not infinitely reconfigurable.
Without sufficient user communities, markets are forced to become integrated.
We have come to know that if you reintermediate ultra-intuitively then you may also benchmark interactively.
It sounds astounding, but it's 100% realistic!
Do you have a strategy to become backward-compatible?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex operation.
the fish has refactored the abstraction of CAD.
We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our media sourcing but our ability to e-enable.
Quick: do you have a infinitely reconfigurable plan for handling unplanned-for front-end interfaces?
Your budget for repurposing should be at least twice your budget for pushing the envelope.
We will architect the commonly-accepted commonly-used term "value-added".
The structuring factor is real-time.
If all of this comes off as unclear to you, that's because it is!
Your budget for cultivating should be at least three times your budget for branding.
It sounds estranging, but it's accurate!
Think B2C2B.
Do you have a plan of action to become one-to-one?