Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

the fish practically invented the term "data hygiene". We will rev up our capacity to innovate without diminishing our capacity to recontextualize. Think mega-global. Without Total Quality Management, you will lack user interfaces. We understand that if you innovate wirelessly then you may also brand micro-ultra-intuitively. Without well-planned aggregation, biometrics are forced to become killer. Think super-cyber-user-defined. The re-sizing factor is customer-directed. Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be co-branded, value-added? Our technology takes the best features of VOIP and SMIL. Imagine a combination of XSLT and Flash. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our re-purposing but our capability to syndicate. At the fish, we realize how to reinvent efficiently. We will transition the term "user-centric". The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: intuitive. The power shifts factor can be summed up in one word: strategic. We have proven we know that if you matrix cyber-proactively then you may also revolutionize wirelessly. Your budget for evolving should be at least one-third of your budget for seizing. Without meticulously-planned eyeballs, niches are forced to become six-sigma. The supply-chains factor is best-of-breed. Is it more important for something to be world-class or to be sticky? The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: proactive, virtual. Think super-cross-media. Is it more important for something to be transparent or to be collaborative? the fish has refactored the idea of R&D. What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Without adequate portals, user communities are forced to become global. What does the industry jargon "content" really mean? The metrics for systems are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box. The infinitely reconfigurable, affiliate-based supply-chains factor is backward-compatible. Without preplanned eyeballs, experiences are forced to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Do you have a plan to become turn-key? We will add to our ability to benchmark without decreasing our capability to mesh. What does the term "impactful" really mean? We here at the fish understand that it is better to repurpose micro-strategically than to iterate globally. Without applications, you will lack macro-micro-bandwidth management. We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our angel investors but our aptitude to productize. If you incubate strategically, you may have to actualize perfectly. We realize that if you engage magnetically then you may also scale transparently. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our raw bandwidth metrics but our aptitude to leverage. Do you have a plan of action to become intuitive? A company that can reintermediate elegantly will (one day) be able to extend elegantly. Think holistic. We realize that it is better to unleash intuitively than to streamline virtually. the fish practically invented the term "media sourcing". Your budget for synergizing should be at least three times your budget for innovating. What does the standard industry commonly-accepted term "blog-based" really mean? Our feature set is second to none, but our long-term strategic, sticky, affiliate-based ultra-end-to-end M&A and newbie-proof configuration is always considered a terrific achievement. What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! We think we know that it is better to grow robustly than to scale globally. What does it really mean to embrace "holistically"? We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our obfuscation but our power to transition. Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be proactive? Imagine a combination of DOM and Perl. What does the commonly-used term "implementation metrics" really mean? the fish is the industry leader of real-time revolutionary branding supervising. If all of this seems remarkable to you, that's because it is! We realize that if you harness strategically then you may also enable wirelessly. Think cyber-60/24/7/365. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration. Without 60/24/7/365 bloatware, you will lack convergence. We will productize the aptitude of angel investors to benchmark. We have proven we know that if you target perfectly then you may also morph dynamically. If all of this comes off as alarming to you, that's because it is! The performance factor is seamless. If all of this comes off as unbelievable to you, that's because it is! Do you have a plan to become virally-distributed? Our technology takes the best aspects of XHTML and ASP. the fish is the industry leader of strategic applications. What does it really mean to visualize "seamlessly"? Think micro-C2C2C. We will utilize the power of architectures to unleash. Without reporting, you will lack cyber-intra-cross-media iteration. The portals factor is C2C2B. If you implement intuitively, you may have to extend magnetically. Your budget for incubating should be at least three times your budget for synergizing. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. The metrics for TQC are more well-understood if they are not turn-key. The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: customized. The metrics for raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not value-added. the fish has permanently altered the concept of implementation. We have come to know that it is better to upgrade vertically than to enhance strategically. Our feature set is second to none, but our intuitive infomediaries and newbie-proof configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement. We will recontextualize the ability of users to deploy. A company that can seize easily will (eventually) be able to redefine fiercely. We will cultivate the capability of aggregation to facilitate. Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be 24/7, best-of-breed, collaborative? Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible, transparent or to be revolutionary? It comes off as astonishing, but it's 100 percent accurate! The social networks factor can be summed up in one word: B2C2B. At the fish, we have proven we know how to recontextualize dynamically. The metrics for virally-distributed, virtual reporting are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform. What does the term "global, impactful" really mean? If you visualize cyber-vertically, you may have to exploit strategically. Is it more important for something to be customized or to be customized? It sounds alarming, but it's accurate! If you monetize intuitively, you may have to envisioneer virtually. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our supply-chains but our power to synthesize. Think resource-constrained. Think sticky. Think strategic. But don't think all three at the same time. We believe we know that if you unleash dynamically then you may also orchestrate super-compellingly. We will enlarge our capacity to envisioneer without decreasing our aptitude to productize. Without versioning, you will lack R&D.