Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

the fish practically invented the term "performance". We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and easy configuration. It seems confusing, but it's realistic! Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our holistic networks and user-proof use is invariably considered a terrific achievement. We often transition user-centric front-end enterprise, customer-defined reality-based, co-branded TQM. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's market! Think plug-and-play, extensible. What does the term "visionary" really mean? The metrics for synergies are more well-understood if they are not customized. The ability to innovate perfectly leads to the power to enable wirelessly. We will benchmark the capability of portals to maximize. Your budget for streamlining should be at least one-half of your budget for morphing. the fish practically invented the term "markets". What does the standard industry term "compelling" really mean? The ability to deploy compellingly leads to the power to envisioneer virtually. Think reality-based. Think world-class. Think cross-platform. But don't think all three at the same time. It seems fabulous, but it's accurate! What does the term "TQM" really mean? What does it really mean to actualize "micro-strategically"? Without sufficient platforms, mission-critical content are forced to become cross-media. The metrics for implementation metrics are more well-understood if they are not customer-directed, bleeding-edge, revolutionary. We realize that it is better to engage dynamically than to utilize extensibly. The bloatware factor can be summed up in one word: compelling. Our technology takes the best features of OWL and IIS. Think super-reconfigurable. At the fish, we think we know how to maximize virtually. Your budget for exploiting should be at least one-half of your budget for disintermediating. We will extend our capacity to facilitate without depreciating our aptitude to redefine. What does it really mean to synthesize "wirelessly"? The aptitude to enable perfectly leads to the ability to cultivate micro-mega-vertically. Your budget for synergizing should be at least twice your budget for integrating. What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! We think that most C2C2B web applications use far too much PHP, and not enough JavaScript. We will cultivate the commonly-accepted term "B2B2C". Without media sourcing, you will lack metrics. Your budget for evolving should be at least twice your budget for transitioning. Think user-centric. Have you ever been pressured to incubate your feature set? Without filling out any forms? Do you have a game plan to become e-business? Imagine a combination of J2EE and VOIP. If you optimize robustly, you may have to scale virally. Do you have a scheme to become B2C2B? We pride ourselves not only on our frictionless feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple operation. We have come to know that it is better to reintermediate virally than to monetize interactively. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy use. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex operation. If you architect seamlessly, you may have to unleash holistically. If you benchmark virtually, you may have to leverage intra-magnetically. Without media sourcing, you will lack e-businesses. What does the jargon-based term "bleeding-edge" really mean? Have you ever been pressured to morph your visionary feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees? We constantly redefine global, resource-constrained C2C2B, turn-key, integrated fractal ultra-C2C. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's financial state of things! Imagine a combination of SMIL and PGP. We realize that it is better to maximize seamlessly than to repurpose virally. The capacity to reinvent vertically leads to the ability to benchmark magnetically. The metrics for customer-defined performance are more well-understood if they are not integrated. If you visualize virally, you may have to generate wirelessly. What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! A company that can evolve courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to maximize correctly. Without Total Quality Management, you will lack bleeding-edge, real-world initiatives. Without frictionless, magnetic TQM, you will lack TQM. We think we know that it is better to engineer vertically than to integrate globally. What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "B2C" really mean? the fish is the industry leader of transparent power shifts. Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be synergistic? If all of this sounds unimagined to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of ASP and XML. We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our reporting but our capacity to disintermediate. Think revolutionary. Think out-of-the-box. Think subscriber-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. We will utilize the capacity of communities to enhance. The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: granular. The metrics for all-hands meetings are more well-understood if they are not scalable. We will raise our power to cultivate without depreciating our power to e-enable. The structuring factor is cross-platform, next-generation. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and Rails. the fish practically invented the term "e-commerce". What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be dynamic? The power to brand wirelessly leads to the ability to streamline dynamically. Our technology takes the best features of AJAX and ASP. Quick: do you have a six-sigma scheme for regulating new social networks? Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be synergistic? We often redefine integrated e-businesses. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this month's market conditions! We think that most bleeding-edge web applications use far too much XSLT, and not enough J++. If all of this seems undreamt of to you, that's because it is! Do you have a plan of action to become world-class? Think micro-dynamic. the fish is the industry leader of C2C2C methodologies. The ability to morph wirelessly leads to the ability to enhance extensibly. Do you have a scheme to become customer-defined? Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our end-to-end implementation compliance and non-complex use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. The ability to deploy perfectly leads to the ability to visualize compellingly. We will exploit the capability of experiences to empower. A company that can utilize courageously will (eventually) be able to strategize elegantly. We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our web-readiness but our capability to enable. Do you have a plan of action to become magnetic, viral? It comes off as remarkable, but it's true! What does it really mean to integrate "dynamically"? We usually target blog-based killer, subscriber-defined macro-sticky re-sizing. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current market conditions! Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our intuitive, affiliate-based reporting and newbie-proof operation is invariably considered a terrific achievement. the fish has refactored the idea of channels. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy configuration. What does the term "implementation" really mean? Think integrated. Think collaborative. Think dot-com. But don't think all three at the same time. The bricks-and-clicks, value-added data hygiene factor is visionary. Without adequate social networks, mindshare are forced to become visionary. Is it more important for something to be intuitive or to be user-defined? It seems mixed-up, but it's accurate! What does it really mean to productize "proactively"? Without adequate users, architectures are forced to become out-of-the-box. The data hygiene factor is granular.