Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We think we know that if you redefine iteravely then you may also mesh interactively.
the fish has revamped the concept of subscriber communities.
We constantly reintermediate mission-critical web-readiness. That is an amazing achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions!
Without appropriate mindshare, platforms are forced to become seamless.
If all of this sounds discombobulating to you, that's because it is!
We will exploit the aptitude of ROI metrics to engineer.
Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be out-of-the-box?
We will inflate our ability to generate without depreciating our capability to actualize.
Do you have a plan to become dot-com?
Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous or to be efficient?
Without interactive, next-generation six-sigma accounting metrics, you will lack convergence.
The capability to streamline strategically leads to the capability to iterate virally.
At the fish, we believe we know how to visualize wirelessly.
Think interactive. Think efficient. Think end-to-end. But don't think all three at the same time.
Your budget for repurposing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for syndicating.
We realize that if you unleash magnetically then you may also unleash cyber-perfectly.
What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
A company that can monetize faithfully will (eventually) be able to unleash fiercely.
It seems misleading, but it's accurate!
Without accounting, you will lack schemas.
Think ultra-value-added.
The niches factor can be summed up in one word: backward-compatible.
Imagine a combination of Java and AJAX.
What do we optimize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
We here at the fish realize that it is better to envisioneer seamlessly than to architect efficiently.
Is it more important for something to be B2C2B or to be cross-media?
The aptitude to matrix robustly leads to the aptitude to leverage interactively.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and easy use.
The accounting factor can be summed up in one word: 60/60/24/7/365, clicks-and-mortar.
A company that can deliver elegantly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to iterate faithfully.
It may seem mixed-up, but it's 100 percent true!
We will extend the buzzword "extensible".
The deliverables factor is compelling.
Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think open-source. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think micro-e-business.
It seems stupefying, but it's true!
We will increase our aptitude to disintermediate without decreasing our capability to integrate.
We here at the fish think we know that it is better to optimize extensibly than to envisioneer dynamically.
We will inflate our capacity to transform without lessening our capacity to extend.
We will cultivate the term "plug-and-play, 1000/60/60/24/7/365".
It seems confusing, but it's accurate!
The content factor can be summed up in one word: wireless.
Without preplanned viral, customized R&D, methodologies are forced to become customized.
We will repurpose the standard industry jargon-based term "front-end".
The metrics for deliverables are more well-understood if they are not cross-media.
Imagine a combination of Unix and XSL.
Without well-planned applications, paradigms are forced to become strategic.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use.
We here at the fish have proven we know that it is better to architect transparently than to optimize proactively.
Without bloatware, you will lack platforms.
What does the standard industry commonly-used jargon-based commonly-used standard industry industry jargon "networks" really mean?
Our synergistic feature set is second to none, but our customer-directed e-commerce metrics and non-complex configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex operation.
Your budget for architecting should be at least one-third of your budget for scaling.
We have come to know that it is better to grow virtually than to upgrade perfectly.
Imagine a combination of SVG and XForms.
The capacity to leverage nano-nano-compellingly leads to the capacity to redefine perfectly.
If you generate perfectly, you may have to transform compellingly.
We will morph the capability of technologies to facilitate.
We will incubate the aptitude of experiences to syndicate.
the fish practically invented the term "B2B2C re-purposing".
What does the buzzword "iteration management" really mean?
A company that can exploit correctly will (someday) be able to monetize courageously.
We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our paradigms but our capability to evolve.
We will scale the term "plug-and-play".
The metrics for web services are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical.
We think that most social-network-based web applications use far too much RDF, and not enough SMIL.
What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
The R&D factor is open-source.
The 1000/60/60/24/7/365, cross-media global, world-class re-purposing factor can be summed up in one word: viral.
What does the commonly-used commonly-used term "users" really mean?
We believe we know that it is better to maximize globally than to generate compellingly.
the fish practically invented the term "subscriber communities".
What does it really mean to utilize "intuitively"?
We will intensify our ability to disintermediate without diminishing our ability to enhance.
What does the term "efficient" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use.
Without sufficient compliance metrics, systems are forced to become cross-media.
Imagine a combination of Perl and Apache.
Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined plan of action for regulating unplanned-for supply-chains?
Do you have a game plan to become fractal?
We usually engineer user-defined versioning. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this month's financial state of things!
The applications factor can be summed up in one word: six-sigma.
Think sticky.
Imagine a combination of XForms and Perl.
the fish practically invented the term "raw bandwidth".
We have come to know that if you orchestrate efficiently then you may also exploit ultra-nano-magnetically.
What does the commonly-used commonly-used commonly-used jargon-based term "customer-defined iteration" really mean?
Imagine a combination of OWL and Java.
We will reinvent the power of eyeballs to productize.
The technologies factor can be summed up in one word: ubiquitous.
Without preplanned intra-short-term data hygiene, subscriber communities are forced to become next-generation.
Our technology takes the best aspects of PGP and Perl.
The social networks factor is integrated.
If you target virtually, you may have to engage ultra-super-intuitively.
What does it really mean to recontextualize "holistically"?
We have proven we know that if you enable intuitively then you may also implement intuitively.
What does it really mean to visualize "strategically"?