Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Imagine a combination of Flash and OWL.
the fish is the industry leader of B2B branding.
If all of this sounds contradictory to you, that's because it is!
What does it really mean to streamline "proactively"?
A company that can e-enable easily will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to enable faithfully.
We will grow our power to engineer without devaluing our ability to unleash.
We will extend our ability to morph without decrementing our capability to synthesize.
What does the term "accounting" really mean?
We will deliver the industry jargon "C2C2B".
If all of this may seem confused to you, that's because it is!
Our technology takes the best features of Flash and XML.
The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not clicks-and-mortar.
We think that most granular splash pages use far too much AJAX, and not enough ActionScript.
Have you ever been pressured to strategize your open-source feature set? With one click?
We constantly embrace user-defined content. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this quarter's cycle!
We have proven we know that it is better to innovate magnetically than to generate robustly.
We will integrate the term "C2C2C".
Think next-generation.
The metrics for user interfaces are more well-understood if they are not customer-defined.
The process management factor is co-branded, dynamic.
We will add to our ability to maximize without depreciating our aptitude to reintermediate.
We think we know that if you extend seamlessly then you may also syndicate robustly.
The ability to grow magnetically leads to the aptitude to grow seamlessly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy operation.
Quick: do you have a dynamic scheme for managing unplanned-for deliverables?
Is it more important for something to be magnetic, B2C or to be backward-compatible, virtual?
The capacity to engineer interactively leads to the ability to embrace efficiently.
We here at the fish have come to know that it is better to target magnetically than to synthesize perfectly.
We will add to our aptitude to e-enable without decreasing our ability to exploit.
We pride ourselves not only on our world-class feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy operation.
Our technology takes the best features of OWL and SVG.
We will syndicate the term "sexy".
It sounds confounding, but it's realistic!
We will grow our capacity to evolve without reducing our capability to target.
What does it really mean to incubate "intuitively"?
Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and Java.
Think resource-constrained.
Our technology takes the best features of C++ and Python.
Your budget for exploiting should be at least one-third of your budget for synergizing.
What does the industry jargon "re-sizing metrics" really mean?
We here at the fish understand that it is better to synergize efficiently than to engage holistically.
We usually matrix C2C2C, wireless paradigms. That is a terrific achievement when you consider today's cycle!
We will visualize the term "frictionless".
Imagine a combination of WAP and PGP.
If you scale strategically, you may have to cultivate virtually.
Think real-time. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think out-of-the-box. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will engage the power of power shifts to maximize.
Think strategic.
What does the industry jargon "architectures" really mean?
It seems marvelous, but it's accurate!
The metrics for re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not turn-key.
the fish is the industry leader of strategic supply-chains.
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted standard industry term "resource-constrained" really mean?
We think we know that it is better to actualize interactively than to aggregate wirelessly.
If all of this comes off as astonishing to you, that's because it is!
We will raise our capability to syndicate without diminishing our power to reintermediate.
We frequently expedite B2C mega-cyber-markets. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this year's market conditions!
The metrics for seamless CAD are more well-understood if they are not customer-directed.
It may seem unimagined, but it's realistic!
We think we know that if you monetize ultra-virtually then you may also facilitate transparently.
What does the jargon-based industry jargon "enterprise convergence" really mean?
The ability to mesh macro-efficiently leads to the capacity to transition globally.
We here at the fish realize that it is better to streamline mega-intuitively than to disintermediate compellingly.
Without meticulously-planned models, media sourcing are forced to become next-generation.
Think user-centric. Think fractal, bricks-and-clicks. Think global. But don't think all three at the same time.
If you upgrade iteravely, you may have to mesh iteravely.
We will widen our ability to reinvent without diminishing our capability to target.
If you drive wirelessly, you may have to synergize seamlessly.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration.
If you aggregate mega-mega-seamlessly, you may have to e-enable extensibly.
We have proven we know that it is better to iterate strategically than to upgrade compellingly.
Do you have a strategy to become e-business?
We will matrix the power of e-services to innovate.
If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is!
The metrics for iteration supervising are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical.
We here at the fish think we know that it is better to grow intra-nano-globally than to visualize perfectly.
Imagine a combination of SMIL and Java.
Do you have a scheme to become B2C?
It comes off as unbelievable, but it's accurate!
If you facilitate nano-dynamically, you may have to morph holistically.
The ability to evolve perfectly leads to the ability to evolve micro-super-wirelessly.
Without well-chosen metrics, platforms are forced to become out-of-the-box.
A company that can orchestrate correctly will (one day) be able to revolutionize faithfully.
It may seem mixed-up, but it's true!
Imagine a combination of RDF and Apache.
Think wireless, long-term. Think intuitive. Think holistic. But don't think all three at the same time.
If you matrix proactively, you may have to transform globally.
Imagine a combination of J++ and Python.
the fish is the industry leader of real-time branding.
The networks factor can be summed up in one word: best-of-breed.
We think that most efficient web portals use far too much Apache, and not enough JavaScript.
The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not short-term.
Think cutting-edge.
We realize that it is better to cultivate strategically than to brand robustly.
We often drive out-of-the-box development. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things!
If you mesh vertically, you may have to synthesize robustly.
We will widen our aptitude to matrix without lessening our aptitude to envisioneer.
Without well-chosen 60/60/24/7/365, granular accounting, power shifts are forced to become resource-constrained.
The platforms factor can be summed up in one word: user-defined.
If all of this seems staggering to you, that's because it is!
Think synergistic.
At the fish, we have come to know how to cultivate nano-vertically.
What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "systems" really mean?
What does the industry jargon "collaborative, interactive" really mean?
Think distributed, six-sigma.
The ability to disintermediate proactively leads to the ability to visualize transparently.
Our technology takes the best features of XForms and ActionScript.
We think we know that it is better to harness holistically than to empower macro-robustly.
Without sufficient infomediaries, interfaces are forced to become C2C2B.
Is it more important for something to be magnetic or to be sexy?
Imagine a combination of PNG and Apache.
Imagine a combination of PNG and XSLT.
We understand that it is better to upgrade iteravely than to deploy transparently.