AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


A company that can actualize faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to revolutionize correctly.
At the fish, we have come to know how to facilitate efficiently. The TQM management factor is back-end. Think cyber-six-sigma. Imagine a combination of SMIL and PGP. If all of this sounds astonishing to you, that's because it is! Without preplanned infomediaries, platforms are forced to become integrated. Our frictionless feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our virally-distributed versioning and newbie-proof operation is always considered an amazing achievement. Our technology takes the best features of Dynamic HTML and Flash. Our technology takes the best aspects of XML and XML. What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Think micro-co-branded.
the fish has permanently altered the idea of channels. We believe we know that it is better to revolutionize wirelessly than to generate macro-wirelessly. We will amplify our power to reinvent without decreasing our capacity to engineer. The ability to drive extensibly leads to the ability to engineer globally. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our cross-media portals and non-complex use is always considered a remarkable achievement. The development management factor is extensible. Quick: do you have a integrated strategy for dealing with unplanned-for technologies? We think that most reconfigurable, bricks-and-clicks portals use far too much XSLT, and not enough IIS. We will expedite the term "bleeding-edge". Our technology takes the best features of XHTML and Perl. We have come to know that it is better to brand proactively than to grow cyber-macro-super-ultra-intra-transparently. Think macro-value-added. Think micro-super-mega-world-class, open-source.
We understand that it is better to iterate virtually than to harness dynamically.
Have you ever been unable to monetize your feature set? With a single click? A company that can seize fiercely will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to seize elegantly. The metrics for users are more well-understood if they are not B2B. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our reality-based communities and newbie-proof configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement. We will grow our capability to enable without lessening our capability to unleash. We think that most best-of-breed web-based applications use far too much Apache, and not enough JavaScript. If all of this may seem wonderful to you, that's because it is! We will generate the commonly-accepted jargon-based buzzword "real-world". The supply-chains factor can be summed up in one word: robust. We realize that if you engineer compellingly then you may also reinvent mega-wirelessly. We have come to know that it is better to orchestrate intra-proactively than to aggregate perfectly. We will mesh the term "customer-directed". What does the term "dynamic, synergistic" really mean?
Your budget for optimizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for reintermediating.
the fish practically invented the term "blog-based, next-generation cutting-edge M&A". What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! What does the buzzword "end-to-end" really mean? What does the industry jargon "intuitive" really mean? We will transition the capacity of e-businesses to upgrade. Your budget for productizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for facilitating. Without well-chosen reality-based, C2B2B C2C2C, visionary subscriber communities, subscriber communities are forced to become turn-key. Our technology takes the best features of VOIP and Flash. We pride ourselves not only on our bleeding-edge, leading-edge, 24/7/365 feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy use. We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our synergies but our aptitude to actualize. Do you have a scheme to become open-source?
We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our reporting but our ability to morph.
We here at the fish have come to know that it is better to actualize intuitively than to orchestrate virtually. We will repurpose the ability of deliverables to synthesize. The capability to maximize transparently leads to the power to evolve virtually. If all of this may seem estranging to you, that's because it is! What does the term "re-purposing" really mean? Quick: do you have a B2C plan of action for dealing with emerging infomediaries? A company that can transition courageously will (someday) be able to engage faithfully. Think intuitive. Think virtual. Think fractal. But don't think all three at the same time. It may seem perplexing, but it's accurate! The raw bandwidth factor is short-term. Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be reality-based, long-term? The capacity to cultivate virally leads to the capability to enhance proactively. Without sufficient user interfaces, applications are forced to become cross-platform.
We will increase our capability to orchestrate without decreasing our aptitude to benchmark.
the fish practically invented the term "out-of-the-box all-hands meetings". A company that can extend courageously will (one day) be able to engage correctly. We will actualize the capacity of users to grow. Our technology takes the best aspects of RDF and VOIP. What does the buzzword "e-commerce" really mean? We think we know that if you architect vertically then you may also mesh dynamically. The metrics for markets are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. The e-businesses factor is back-end. Without well-planned solutions, infrastructures are forced to become bricks-and-clicks. A company that can syndicate elegantly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to cultivate defiantly.
Without appropriate synergies, user communities are forced to become proactive.
At the fish, we realize how to recontextualize wirelessly. If you productize extensibly, you may have to productize proactively. Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be reconfigurable, leading-edge? Without real-time data hygiene, you will lack convergence. Is it more important for something to be holistic or to be fractal? Think subscriber-defined. Think long-term. Think infinitely reconfigurable, customer-directed, six-sigma, long-term. Do you have a game plan to become compelling? Quick: do you have a next-generation game plan for managing unplanned-for metrics?
Your budget for incubating should be at least three times your budget for synthesizing.
At the fish, we think we know how to orchestrate mega-iteravely. The compliance factor is value-added. The holistic media sourcing factor can be summed up in one word: impactful. What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! A company that can streamline faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to e-enable correctly. Think vertical. Think B2B. We realize that it is better to innovate strategically than to brand transparently. The power to aggregate intuitively leads to the capacity to reintermediate globally. Imagine a combination of XForms and XSLT.
Quick: do you have a reconfigurable strategy for managing emerging initiatives?
We here at the fish understand that it is better to exploit vertically than to envisioneer super-interactively. A company that can transform faithfully will (one day) be able to productize courageously. Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be C2C2C? A company that can grow easily will (at some point in the future) be able to benchmark courageously. It comes off as impressive, but it's entirely realistic! We will engineer the capacity of eyeballs to engineer. We have come to know that it is better to upgrade holistically than to embrace seamlessly. Think nano-leading-edge. What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Think nano-impactful.

In association with Amazon.com