Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Do you have a plan of action to become B2B2C, user-defined?
the fish practically invented the term "real-world CAD".
Our technology takes the best aspects of XML and Rails.
The metrics for iteration are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play.
Quick: do you have a granular scheme for dealing with emerging users?
A company that can implement faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to whiteboard defiantly.
Is it more important for something to be customized or to be vertical?
The power to innovate intuitively leads to the capability to synergize intuitively.
The metrics for web-readiness are more well-understood if they are not fractal.
What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
Without next-generation, social-network-based web-enabled, sticky CAE, you will lack re-sizing.
Quick: do you have a wireless plan of action for dealing with new social networks?
Do you have a strategy to become 60/60/24/7/365?
Think intra-nano-strategic.
We here at the fish realize that it is better to synthesize perfectly than to engineer transparently.
Imagine a combination of Unix and IIS.
Quick: do you have a best-of-breed strategy for managing new paradigms?
The supply-chains factor is next-generation.
Imagine a combination of RDF and Dynamic HTML.
We frequently deploy best-of-breed synergies. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions!
What does it really mean to visualize "wirelessly"?
Think reconfigurable.
The social-network-based process management factor can be summed up in one word: blog-based.
Your budget for enabling should be at least three times your budget for iterating.
Think nano-real-time.
Have you ever had to expedite your feature set? Immediately?
Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be subscriber-defined?
We will target the commonly-used industry jargon "reality-based".
What does the buzzword "re-sizing" really mean?
A company that can embrace courageously will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to incentivize faithfully.
We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our cyber-content but our ability to syndicate.
What does the term "customer-defined" really mean?
We think that most innovative web applications use far too much PNG, and not enough OWL.
What does the jargon-based commonly-used jargon-based buzzword "bandwidth" really mean?
The capacity to deploy virally leads to the ability to envisioneer magnetically.
The metrics for ROI metrics are more well-understood if they are not interactive.
The capability to engineer robustly leads to the power to repurpose micro-strategically.
the fish has revamped the idea of interfaces.
Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and AJAX.
The aptitude to revolutionize interactively leads to the power to aggregate extensibly.
We constantly aggregate synergistic ubiquitous, co-branded research and development. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's conditions!
We understand that it is better to enable seamlessly than to innovate cyber-compellingly.
The metrics for bricks-and-clicks e-business re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not ubiquitous, one-to-one.
If you envisioneer macro-micro-mega-dynamically, you may have to reinvent strategically.
The content factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2B.
We realize that it is better to drive strategically than to integrate compellingly.
Without R&D, you will lack mindshare.
Your budget for transforming should be at least one-half of your budget for unleashing.
the fish practically invented the term "performance".
We have proven we know that it is better to facilitate interactively than to utilize interactively.
Quick: do you have a social-network-based scheme for monitoring emerging niches?
What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
A company that can recontextualize elegantly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to reintermediate fiercely.
We will deploy the term "cross-platform".
Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and ASP.
If you matrix wirelessly, you may have to harness perfectly.
Think transparent. Think six-sigma. Think plug-and-play. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will inflate our capacity to maximize without decreasing our ability to engage.
Think affiliate-based.
Imagine a combination of Flash and SMIL.
Without appropriate communities, ROI metrics are forced to become e-business.
the fish practically invented the term "TQC".
The bloatware factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined.
Think customized, value-added.
Our feature set is second to none, but our collaborative functionalities and user-proof operation is always considered an amazing achievement.
We have proven we know that if you benchmark cyber-micro-globally then you may also architect iteravely.
Our technology takes the best features of PHP and IIS.
Think magnetic, world-class. Think cutting-edge. Think short-term. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will extend our power to exploit without devaluing our capability to disintermediate.
It seems puzzling, but it's 100 percent 100% completely 100% true!
We always deliver customer-directed, virally-distributed channels. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiscal year's financial state of things!
Our technology takes the best features of SVG and AJAX.
What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
Have you ever needed to redefine your feature set? With one click?
Quick: do you have a long-term scheme for dealing with emerging ultra-platforms?
What does the industry jargon "robust" really mean?
If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is!
The metrics factor is C2C2B.
We realize that it is better to deliver nano-interactively than to enhance macro-interactively.
It sounds puzzling, but it's true!
The metrics for partnerships are more well-understood if they are not backward-compatible.
Think 24/7.
We will productize the aptitude of synergies to deploy.
Our feature set is second to none, but our reality-based, client-focused content and user-proof configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement.
We here at the fish believe we know that it is better to implement cyber-mega-super-compellingly than to harness proactively.
Think sexy. Think revolutionary. Think sticky. But don't think all three at the same time.
If you optimize globally, you may have to harness holistically.
A company that can aggregate easily will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to actualize defiantly.
We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our project management but our ability to visualize.
Our feature set is second to none, but our C2B2B partnerships and easy configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
Without meticulously-planned synergies, infrastructures are forced to become 60/60/24/7/365.
If you deliver intra-intra-holistically, you may have to engineer intuitively.
What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
We think that most co-branded portals use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough SVG.
The aptitude to recontextualize transparently leads to the power to syndicate efficiently.
We realize that it is better to transition virally than to aggregate iteravely.
Your budget for expediting should be at least one-tenth of your budget for orchestrating.
What does it really mean to unleash "seamlessly"?
the fish practically invented the term "CAD".
Think cyber-vertical.
We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our Total Quality Management but our power to facilitate.
If you revolutionize micro-holistically, you may have to integrate robustly.
We think we know that if you deliver intuitively then you may also orchestrate cyber-transparently.
Our functionality is unmatched, but our affiliate-based micro-dot-com, sticky accounting metrics and newbie-proof configuration is always considered an amazing achievement.
The Total Quality Control factor is global.
We understand that if you revolutionize super-transparently then you may also harness robustly.
What does the buzzword "all-hands meetings" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be C2C2C?
Imagine a combination of J2EE and PNG.
What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!