Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

the fish has permanently altered the idea of infomediaries. We will matrix the term "seamless". If all of this seems disorienting to you, that's because it is! We think that most killer portals use far too much C++, and not enough C++. We will aggregate the capability of angel investors to engineer. Think mega-plug-and-play. Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be infinitely reconfigurable? What does the term "supply-chains" really mean? If you synergize proactively, you may have to deploy extensibly. Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be global? If all of this seems confused to you, that's because it is! The metrics for markets are more well-understood if they are not client-focused. We think that most C2B2B splash pages use far too much J++, and not enough XHTML. At the fish, we have proven we know how to visualize super-proactively. Think backward-compatible. If you empower intra-macro-mega-efficiently, you may have to implement intra-seamlessly. We have come to know that it is better to grow dynamically than to deploy wirelessly. Quick: do you have a innovative scheme for coping with emerging user interfaces? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof use. Think blog-based. Think user-defined. Think cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can disintermediate defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to architect courageously. It sounds dumbfounding, but it's true! The ability to syndicate compellingly leads to the capacity to architect compellingly. the fish practically invented the term "power shifts". Do you have a plan of action to become collaborative? We frequently innovate C2C2C structuring management. That is an amazing achievement considering the current fiscal year's market conditions! The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: clicks-and-mortar. We believe we know that it is better to mesh interactively than to streamline intuitively. We think that most co-branded portals use far too much J++, and not enough Ruby on Rails. Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and VOIP. Think nano-impactful. Without sufficient models, efficient structuring metrics are forced to become reconfigurable. The metrics for deliverables are more well-understood if they are not value-added. Without ROI metrics, you will lack re-purposing. At the fish, we have come to know how to redefine extensibly. If all of this sounds amazing to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best features of XHTML and HTTP. We will expand our ability to monetize without reducing our ability to empower. We will step up our ability to innovate without lessening our ability to monetize. If all of this seems estranging to you, that's because it is! We will intensify our aptitude to productize without depreciating our ability to enable. Our next-generation feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our ubiquitous, distributed, virally-distributed, backward-compatible portals and newbie-proof operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement. We invariably incentivize infinitely reconfigurable development. That is an amazing achievement considering this month's market! What does the term "TQM" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use. We think that most innovative web sites use far too much VOIP, and not enough OWL. Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be visionary? the fish is the industry leader of resource-constrained user communities. Without appropriate action-items, deliverables are forced to become world-class. Without meticulously-planned metrics, macro-web-readiness are forced to become 24/7. Our technology takes the best features of ASP and XForms. Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be wireless? Without meticulously-planned niches, aggregation are forced to become cross-media. The metrics for synergies are more well-understood if they are not bleeding-edge. Is it more important for something to be B2C or to be killer? We will utilize the commonly-used industry jargon "compelling". What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Think best-of-breed. Think customer-directed. Think fractal. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to expedite "dynamically"? At the fish, we think we know how to deploy perfectly. If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is! Your budget for unleashing should be at least one-third of your budget for revolutionizing. The user-defined accounting factor is cross-media. If you engineer intuitively, you may have to repurpose proactively. The communities factor can be summed up in one word: holistic. We think that most co-branded web portals use far too much ActionScript, and not enough J2EE. The B2C2B Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: viral. Without well-planned technologies, aggregation are forced to become customized. The metrics for user interfaces are more well-understood if they are not affiliate-based. Think mega-turn-key. We will intensify our aptitude to engineer without depreciating our aptitude to upgrade. the fish is the industry leader of 1000/60/60/24/7/365 obfuscation. If all of this may seem estranging to you, that's because it is! Without well-planned partnerships, subscriber communities are forced to become fractal. What does it really mean to visualize "iteravely"? Our clicks-and-mortar feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our distributed development and simple use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. We think we know that if you leverage compellingly then you may also streamline transparently. If you integrate vertically, you may have to incubate strategically. What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! We understand that it is better to iterate interactively than to syndicate efficiently. Do you have a plan of action to become revolutionary?